SPROXY in ECC for PI

hello guys,
The PI system has just got installed, when i saw SPROXY transaction i came across a whole lot of interfaces in ECC.
Is it as an add on component for other ERP products..cos generally even in Dev systems i have seen only the interfaces we define in IR reflecting in SPROXY in ECC
ne idea on this?

Hi Ravindra,
I think the connections are not proper.
check the connections in the ECC like
Regarding Proxy Scenario We need 3 connections
STEP1:
1.TCP\IP connections
1.1.LCRSAPRFC
1.2.SAPSLDAPI
2.Settings are to be done in SLDAPICUST transaction
3.Http Connection: -
3.1.PI_INTEGRATIONSERVER
Purpose of LCRSAPRFC:
In order to get the interface details in SPROXY transaction.
Purpose of SAPSLDAPI
To connect to SLD and get the respective business system name maintained in SLD,
Purpose Of SLDAPICUST
Next Execute transaction SLDAPICUST to maintain the SLD access data.
Purpose of PI_INTEGRATIONSERVER
Create a destination of type H in transaction SM59.This connection is used to send the message to the Integration server
Check all these connections are there or not in ECC.
I think problem with LCRSAPRFC...Check that connection and check the programID is same as programID in XI..
Thanks

Similar Messages

SPROXY in ECC doesn't show all the IR objects

SPROXY in ECC doesn't display all my objects in XI integration repository. But I am able to see those objects and create proxy if run SPROXY on XI.
Is there a configuration missing R3 or SLD?
Please help.

Yep, you need to activate proxies on your ECC system.
Follow the steps in this blog for the same,
/people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies
Regards
Bhavesh
PS: Please search on SDN. This is the most common question for which a simple search would have given the same reply.

Replication of a BP in CRM as a FI Vendor in ECC for Grants Management

Hi,
We are implenting SAP CRM 7 with SAP ECC for Grants Management, integrated with FI AP (we're not using PSCD).
For BP replication we followed the next steps, however something looks it is incorrect because my BDOC still shows errors:
The middleware settings had been completed between the CRM and the ECC system.
- Site, Suscription and replication from CRM to SAP ECC are in placed
   -The next replication object are activated:
    -All Business Partners (MESG)   (BUPA_MAIN)
    -All Busines Partner Relationships (MESG) (BUPA_REL)
    -All Business Transactions (MESG)
    -Grantor Program Management
Also we implemented the next steps:
1) Define the number ranges for BP groupings in CRM: This number range would be internal in CRM and External in ECC.
CRM (IMG) -> Customer Relationship Management -> Cross-Application Components -> SAP Business Partner -> Basic Settings ->
Number Ranges and Groupings
2) Since the BP would be replicated as a BP in ECC we define the same number ranges in ECC too:
ERP (IMG) -> Customer Relationship Management -> Cross-Application Components -> SAP Business Partner -> Basic Settings ->
Define Groupings and Assign Number Ranges
3) Activate the post-processing framework: (Business processes CVI_02 and CVI_04 in Component AP-MD)
ERP (IMG) -> Cross-Application Components -> General Application Functions ->Postprocessing Office -> Business Processes->
Activate Creation of Postprocessing Orders
4) Activate PPO Requests for Platform Objects in the Dialog:
ERP (IMG) -> Cross-Application Components -> Master Data Synchronization -> Synchronization Control -> Synchronization
Control -> Activate PPO Requests for Platform Objects in the Dialog
Edited by: Lyda Osorio on Oct 9, 2009 7:25 AM

For CRM I had the following FM activated:
BPOUT     BUPA     100000     CRM_BUPA_OUTB_RENTED_ADDRESS     X
BPOUT     BUPA     200000     BUPA_MWX_BDOC_CREATE_MAIN     X
BPOUT     BUPA     300000     CRM_BUPA_OUTB_MARKETING_ATTR     X
BPOUT     BUPA     400000     VEND_MWX_CREATE_MAIN_BDOC     X
BPOUT     BUPA     1000000     BUPA_OUTBOUND_MAIN     X
BPOUT     BUPR     100000     BUPA_MWX_BDOC_CREATE_REL     X
BPOUT     BUPX     1000000     MDS_BUPA_OUTBOUND     X
CLEAR     BUPA     1000000     BUPA_OUTBOUND_CLEAR_FLAGS     X
CRMIN     BUAG     100000     CRM_BUAG_MWX_PROCESS_EXT_STRUC     X
CRMIN     BUPA     90100     CRM_BUPA_INBOUND_SET_BUAG_FLAG     X
CRMIN     BUPA     1000000     BUPA_INBOUND_MAIN_CENTRAL     X
CRMIN     BUPA     1100000     CRM_BUPA_INBOUND_MAIN_MD     X
CRMIN     BUPA     1200000     CRM_BUPA_BDOC_MAP_MAIN     X
CRMIN     BUPA     1400000     CRM_BUPA_KOREA_INBOUND_MAP     X
CRMIN     BUPA     2000000     ABA_FSBP_INBOUND_MAIN     X
CRMIN     BUPR     1000000     BUPA_INBOUND_REL_CENTRAL     X
CRMIN     BUPR     1100000     CRM_BUPA_INBOUND_REL_MD     X
CRMIN     BUPR     1200000     CRM_BUPA_BDOC_MAP_REL     X
CRMOU     BUAG     100000     CRM_BUAG_MWX_FILL_EXT_FROM_MEM     X
CRMOU     BUPA     1000000     BUPA_OUTBOUND_BPS_FILL_CENTRAL     X
CRMOU     BUPA     1200000     CRM_BUPA_OUTB_BPS_FILL_MD     X
CRMOU     BUPR     1000000     BUPA_OUTBOUND_BPR_FILL_CENTRAL     X
CRMOU     BUPR     1200000     CRM_BUPA_OUTB_BPR_FILL_MD     X
CRMOU     BUPR     1300000     CRM_BUPA_BDOC_BPR_FILL_DATA     X
EXTR     BUAG     100000     CRM_BUAG_MAIN_GET_ID_LIST     X
MERGE     BUPA     1000000     MERGE_BUPA_CENTRAL     X
MERGE     BUPA     2000000     MERGE_BUPA_FINSERV     X
MERGE     BUPR     1000000     MERGE_BUPR_CENTRAL     X
PXYIN     BUPA     1000000     BUPA_INBOUND     X
R3AOU     BUPA     100000     BUPA_MWX_BDOC_UP_CURRSTATE_SET     X
XIIN     BUPA     1000000     ABA_BUPA_MAP_PROXY_TO_DDIC     X
XIIN     BUPA     2000000     ABA_FSBP_MAP_PROXY_TO_DDIC     X
XIIN     BUPA     2100000     ABA_FSBP_MAP_PROXY_TO_DDIC_1     X
XIIN     BUPR     1000000     ABA_BUPR_MAP_PROXY_TO_DDIC     X
XIOUT     BUPA     1000000     ABA_BUPA_MAP_DDIC_TO_PROXY     X
XIOUT     BUPR     1000000     ABA_BUPR_MAP_DDIC_TO_PROXY     X

PO approval process in ECC for extended classic scenario

Hi All,
At this moment we are using SAP ECC for procure to pay process. In the existing system set up, our ECC purchase order goes for approval via SAP enterprise portal(EP). We are planing to implement SRM 7.0 Extended classic scenario, so that user can take the advantage of creating PO in their web portal. We don't want to disturb our existing ECC PO approval process at this point of time.
So our requirement is :
User will create PO in SRM. Same PO will replicated in ECC and the PO will goes for approval in in ECC and the PO output will generate in ECC. Can it me possible in extended classic scenario ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jennifer
Edited by: Jennifer Batty on Aug 8, 2011 5:08 PM

Hi Jennifer,
Since SRM PO will be leading PO in extended classic scenario, why donot you design the process controlled workflow in line with the existing release strategy that you are using for ECC PO?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Creating Roles in SAP ECC for autority in BO

Hi Guru's,
Can anyone point me to additional information about how provisioning works in SAP ECC for BO?
I am also looking for information on how to create some general roles in SAP ECC to transport into BO to control authority.
I have already read through the "Business Objects Enterprise Admin Guide".
Thank you in advance,
Steven

Hi,
to synchronize the roles you can use CUA. In CUA, you define 1 system as a central store for user administration and then distribute the users + roles + groups to the systems. You configure your EP and ECC to receive the user data from that system, therefor, you user information is in sync.
SAP Help: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/07/622441cd87a12be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
For more information, there is an SAP product: Identity Management.
SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/nw-identitymanagement
To upload ECC roles to EP:
SDN Article: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/06a0e690-0201-0010-4b9f-e529c345a831
User Mapping is for logging in to a backend, when the userid in the backend is different from the userid in the portal
SAP Help: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/f8/3b514ca29011d5bdeb006094191908/frameset.htm
br,
Tobias

Should I install the [ HP 4GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1333MHz ECC ] for S10 ?

Should I install the [ HP 4GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1333MHz ECC ] for S10 ?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

4 gb modules won't work in the S10.
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

Do you know how i can use Ipad inside ATEX certified areas ( e.g. refinery plant) ? Do you know if exist somespecial arrangement ( cover, enclosure, ecc) for this ?

Do you know how i can use Ipad inside ATEX certified areas ( e.g. refinery plant) ? Do you know if exist somespecial arrangement ( cover, enclosure, ecc) for this ?

Hello
At least one cover manufactrer will try to propose an Atex (Ex 2) cover for ipad
http://dofero.com/Viz-iCARRY.html
i dont know if it is already on the market.
Another one is making IP68 and military Standard 810F-516.15 that seems to include some kind of ability to work in explosible atmosphere.
http://www.lifeproof.com/ipad#why-nuud
Here what I found. I'm also interested of further talk on this topic, workimg as Occupational Hygienist for Swiss Industries.
hope this post helps.
Best Regards
Vincent

Is there any BADI or any other alternate in ECC for the Field exits

Hi guys,
Is there any BADI or any other alternate in ECC for the Field exits:
FIELD_EXIT_BP_VERS_Z
FIELD_EXIT_BP_VERSION

Hi,
If you are aware that these are the field exit funciton modules that get created when you create a field exit for the corresponding data element.
Hence there will not be any replacement for this FM, But you need to find where the data element is triggering(the tcode) and check in debugging if there is any BADI/Enhancement Point.
Hence check for which data element the FM belong to using the program RSMODPRF and check if they are globally activated, then they trigger on all the screen/transactions..(Tedious to replace with BADi/Enhancemnet points everywherre)
If the field exit is activated for screens, check to which transaction the screens belong to and then check for enhancement point or badi that trigers on the screen..
Hope this helps
Regards
Shiva

Is there equivalent BADI or Implict enhancements in ECC for Filed exit

Hi guys,
Is there any BADI or any other alternate in ECC for the Field exits:
FIELD_EXIT_BP_VERS_Z
FIELD_EXIT_BP_VERSION

Hi,
If you are aware that these are the field exit funciton modules that get created when you create a field exit for the corresponding data element.
Hence there will not be any replacement for this FM, But you need to find where the data element is triggering(the tcode) and check in debugging if there is any BADI/Enhancement Point.
Hence check for which data element the FM belong to using the program RSMODPRF and check if they are globally activated, then they trigger on all the screen/transactions..(Tedious to replace with BADi/Enhancemnet points everywherre)
If the field exit is activated for screens, check to which transaction the screens belong to and then check for enhancement point or badi that trigers on the screen..
Hope this helps
Regards
Shiva

Running Sproxy from ECC 6.0/ SAP NW 7.0 - BI service pack 16

We have ECC 6.0 / SAP Netweave BI 7.0 sps 16
I want run Sproxy, after this new service pack I could not figure out how to run SPROXY by giving oue own data.
Earlier I have use dSPROXY, when I run it ask for Generate XML template, i could paste the data from previous run, now I could not paste the data .
IS there any other way, we can fill the XML template generate data.

> We have ECC 6.0 / SAP Netweave BI 7.0 sps 16
It should be PI 7.0 not BI 7.0. Correct??
> I want run Sproxy, after this new service pack I could not figure out how to run SPROXY by giving oue own data.
Couldn't understand this???
>
> Earlier I have use dSPROXY, when I run it ask for Generate XML template, i could paste the data from previous run, now I could not paste the data .
>
Couldn't understand this too.
> IS there any other way, we can fill the XML template generate data.
Your question is not clear, plz write clearly then it is possible to suggest any solution.
Regards,
Sarvesh

Open Transactions in ECC for Master Data changes in MDM

Hi All,
I have a basic Design question on how to handle the impact of Data changes in MDM for any open transactions with that Master object. For eg if we have a Material set up in MDM and in ECC and there are open Purchase Orders for that Material, now if the Base Unit of Measure is changed in MDM and gets harmonized to ECC(After Workflow approval of the Change) how will it impact the PO attached to the material . Can we do any configuration in ECC that will restrict any Open PO s not to take the new changed value and any new POs taking up the new Base Unit of Measure , or can we set up an alert/notification that will trigger for a PO whenever any Master Data is changed and the PO takes the new changed value on the fly . What will be the best approach from a solution point of view .
Thanks ,
Prabuddha

Hi Prabuddha,
In ECC if a change happens to a master data not all the changes are reflected automatically in the open documents like open PO or open Sales order. Some fields values have to be redetermined for eg: "pricing procedure", some of them needs to be changed manually for eg: "Description". Moreover specific to your eg of Base unit of measure, this is a sensitive field and has lot of impact on the process so there for changing such fields it is necessary to close all the open documents against the Master data record in consideration. This fact is regardless whether the change happens through an IDoc or directly by MM02/XK02/XD02
Prabudha, Please revert if you have further questions.
Best Regards
P T Manoj
Edited by: PT MANOJ on Sep 2, 2011 10:25 PM

Inventory:Transaction in ECC for displaying Total Stock and Stock value

Hello Experts,
I have ran the report on BW side which gives me Inventory's Total Stock (ZTOTALST) & Stock Value(ZSTDPRICE) period wise.
I want to reconsile data between ECC & BW for these two fields, please provide me trasactions for the same.
I have material num & Plant for input.
I want to see the ZTOTALST & ZSTDPRICE value period wise in ECC.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Yash.

Hi,
Check in MB5B and MC.9 Tcodes in ECC.
Note: select Valuated Stock in ECC and gibe Date Ranges also
Thanks
Reddy

GR_NON_VAL flag setting in ECC for SRM PO

Hi all,
SRM 5.0 ECS Sp12.
When we create a PO with multiple a/c assgt,the ECC PO which gets created always has the GR_NON_VAL flag set as "X".
Now if I uncheck the indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   " in SRM PO,then the PO replication fails in ECC and in SRM I get the below error :
With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicator
When I check the data which is passed to ECC,the GR_NON_VAL flag is also blank for the PO after the indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   " are unchecked in SRM PO.
Can someone let me know if in ECS , the GR_NON_VAL flag is always passed as blank and gets set to "X"based on ECC settings.If so,which settings in ECC determine the GR_NON_VAL flag to be set?
Can someone explain the istd behaviour for the GR_NON_VLAg flag in ECC PO for ECS when SRM PO with multiple a/c assignnment is changed for indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   "so that they are set to blank,Please advise.

HI
in standard we canl fill the flag GR_NON_VAL in SRM side but
the itemx structure of PO in ERP system set to space. After this mapping
BAPIs will be called.
wa_bapi_poitemx-po_itemx = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-no_more_gr = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-final_inv = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-gr_ind = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-delete_ind = 'X'.
delivery tolerance has to be taken over
    wa_bapi_poitemx-over_dlv_tol = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-unlimited_dlv = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-under_dlv_tol = 'X'.
note 644721, the Goods receipt non-valuated should be set according
to the backend customizing for this we have to clear the x-flag
    wa_bapi_poitemx-gr_non_val = ' '.
    wa_bapi_poitem-gr_non_val = ' '.
The redetermination will happen in PO create / change process
(within BAPI_PO_CHANGE and BAPI_PO_CREATE1).
1353431    ECS: PO in ERP always created with GR_NON_V
Summer

Report against BW and ECC for reconciliation

Hello Everyone,
I would need some advice on crystal report design for a requirement where I have to use an existing query on BW to build a crystal report and then create a report on top of table in ECC and then do a reconciliation between these two data sets.
So, Once I create the crystal reports individually for each of the systems is there a way to create a third report which would allow me to do a difference between the values from two reports previously generated to do the reconciliation.
Please let me know.
Thanks
Dharma.

Hello,
Thanks for replying back to the question. I apologize for the questions (am new to crystal reports, so am trying to get my hands around it for reconciliation report)
I created two crystal reports
1. Report on top of BW
      Fields:
         A. Company Code
         B. Vendor
         C. Local Currency
         D. Total Amount
2. Report on top of ECC
     Fields:
        A. Company Code
        B. Vendor
        C. Local Currency
        D. Total Amount (This is a formula, as I used the total amount and debit/credit indicator to get the negative sign for amount)
Once I have created these two reports,
The first question is,
            In the second report for the combination of the three characteristics mentioned above I have multiple rows, how can I aggregate them similar to BW where I have one row for a given combination.
The second question is,
            I created a third report and I used the option you mentioned earlier "Insert --> Sub-report". When I used this option I selected the first report on top of BW and inserted it into Data Field and then used the same option to insert the second report on top of ECC and inserted it in Data field below the first report.
Once I had these reports inserted, I created formula fields in the third report for the following fields
1. Company Code
2. Vendor
3. Local Currency
4. Total Amount
From here on, I am not sure how can I link the fields from the above reports to the third report and also how can I do reconciliation between these two reports.
I really appreciate your help in this regards.
Thanks
Dharma.

Sender Port Error in SAP ECC for IDoc

Hi,
I am creating scenario IDOC -> XI -> JDBC with Customer Master IDoc.
After sending it with we19 he said "IDoc sent to SAP system or external program".
In we02 and we05 the IDOC it says "Data passed to port OK".
But in SM58, the IDoc ends in error saying
Transaction IDX1: Port SAPIDST100, client 600, RFC destination contains error.
What I identified that the port SAPIDST100 is the sender port in the IDoc being send. However, for PI we do not need to maintain sender port.
Business Systems:
Sender : SAP ECC
Receiver: SAPPID
Kindly provide your inputs.
Thanks
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
thanks for the information that your scenario is working fine.
But i want to clarify some points:
   - If you send out an IDoc from an ECC system, the senderport is filled with SAP+<system-id> by the SAP IDOC API,
     i.e. if your system id is "ABC", the senderport is "SAPABC"
      => your senderport SAPIDST does not match this template, so i assume you entered the value for the senderport
     manually in the idoc test utility WE19
   - if you send out an idoc, only the receiver port must be created in transaction WE21, it is not necessary to create
     the senderport in WE21, this is not necessary and did not solve your problem
- the idoc was send from ECC (application system with application IDoc metadata) to an XI/PI system (basis system
    without application idoc metadata
   The IDoc adapter on the pi system must analyze the IDoc segments and must know the idoc application metadata,
   but this is not known. So the idoc adapter on PI side looks at the senderport to identify the sender.
   In transaction IDX1 an rfc-destination can be configured to point to the sendersystem with that senderport
   With this rfc-destination the IDoc adapter tries to read the idoc aplication metadata from the ECC system and stores it on PI side.
   If there is no rfc-destination configured in transaction IDX1 on PI side you get the error mentioned in your request.
   I assume that in transaction IDX1 somebody configured the correct RFC-Destination.
I hope this clarification helps you to understand the error and the solution.
Kind regards,
Andreas Dahl

SPROXY in ECC for PI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for