SQ01 query layouts has been changed after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC

Hi All,
If any one come across the following situation please provide the solution as soon as posssible.
When you execute the query the results are not displayed as fields are not copied under display column,not sorted,not filtered becos of this the query results are not displayed. Is there any solution are setting that need to be done so that the layouts fields are copied,sorted and filtered as they were before upgrade. I have checked all the query variants and they are imported correctly to ECC from 4.6c,there is problem only with the display.
Is the query layout changes due to upgrade?
Regards,
JB

Please Post the Note Number.
late but Sure it will help others in future.

Similar Messages

What has been your experience upgrading from Mac OS X 10.6.0 to 10.7 or 10.8? I read real horror stories about Maverick.

What has been your experience upgrading from Mac OS X 10.6.8 ti 10.7 or 10.8?

my story was indeed a horror story
Mavericks is not an upgrade of previous OSes, but rather a port of iOS
If you want your computer to function like an iPad, go for it.
Snow Leopard on the other hand is a full-featured and stable OS - the best of them in my opinion.
Mavericks makes it easier to port Pages and Numbers documents back and forth between your computer and your iPad - but this portability comes at the price of many, many lost features in both programs. Over 100 lost features in Pages. Don't know how many for Numbers, but because of lost functionality you risk losing data (if you used Footers and Headers, Page View, etc.).
It is possible to use the older version of iWork under Mavericks, but it is a real pain as Mavericks keeps trying to default you to the newer versions. Even accidentally opening with the newer version and not saving changes can cause the file identifier to be altered making it no longer open under the older version (I did find a way to force open) Deleting the newer versions from your system results in Mavericks nagging you on a daily basis to reinstall them. There is no option to say No, only the option to postpone for one day.
the OS itself is much less customizable, I found it much harder to use with older eyesight because I couldn't highlight my scroll bars, or change the colour of certain files in a list, etc. Anywhere I went to Preferences I was struck by how few of them there were - less than half as many as Snow Leopard, in some cases less than 25%. Again, I had used those missing Preferences.
Mavericks also takes away many of the abilities of iTunes to sync with your iPad or iPhone and forces you to use iCloud to do much of the synching. If you don't want to use iCloud, or if you have confidentiality issues that prevent you from using it - you are out of luck.
In the end I found Mavericks unusable. The process of reverting back to Snow Leopard required 5 hours with 2 different geniuses at the Apple Store, 2 deep wipes of my computer and fresh install of Snow Leopard. And some loss of settings and data.
If you choose to go for it, then make a bootable backup first. Some sources suggest making 2 backups.
There are people who are happy with Mavericks, but I am not one of them.
Since I had my misadventure they have made some improvements to Mavericks, but not nearly enough of them to tempt me back. For example, you cannot set your old Pages and Numbers documents to 'always open' with the older version of the software ... or rather you can set them to, but Mavericks will immediately revert it back to the new version.

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

After upgrading from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 templates not working in smartform

Hello,
After upgrading from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 templates not working properly in smartform, although value is flowing to the point the template is getting called and inside the template there are text elements where placeholders are kept to display the value, when the print is taken there are no values being displayed by the text elements.
Please note - Text elements doesnot have any conditions present in the condition tabstrip.
Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,
After the upgrade, you will have to do the security upgrade.
Please follow these steps.
1. Go To SU25
2. Run step 2A to 2D.
3. In step 2C, you shall get the list of all the affected roles.
Click on first role. It will take you to authorizations of that role. Click on the "New" tab there to find the new objects added to the role after the upgrade.
Note: You can open the same role in the unupgraded system to check.
4. Provide the access to the required authorization objects.
5. Disable the unwanted authorization objects.
6. Generate the profile.
7. Follow the same steps for all the affected roles listed.
Please note that you will have a list of new objects added.You need to maintain them inorder to avoid any access issues.
8. After step 2C, complete 2D.
Regards,
Imran

Impact on Custom / Std IDOC after upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

I am in Upgrade project (4.7 to ECC 6.0).
What will be the impact of the existing Custom and Std IDOC after upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and if any impact, what are precautionary steps to be taken to work as it is.
Will there be any Impact on ALE also ?
Thanks & Regards
Khaleel

closed.

Report Layout Changed After Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Dear Gurus,
I do functional test of every process in ECC6 after upgrade from 4.6C. I found all report layout changed without variant (it's happen to all Query/SQ01 reports ). So I've to assign manually the fields for the reports, and create a default variant then.
Why it happen ? Is there configuration or setting missed or this is standard while we do upgrade ?
Thx in advance.
Tri Wicaksono

We do re arrange for all ALV report ...

Can you track a form if the file name has been changed after distribution?

I created a form in Adobe Acrobat X Pro -- I then used the distribute feature and sent the form to myself using the internal server. After testing the form, and making sure all was good, I copied the attachment from the email I received when I distributed the form to myself, and sent it to my boss (via outlook). He then changed the file name, and sent the form out to our members. Our members are completing this newly-changed document instead of the original form. They are able to "Submit The Form", and it still looks as though its coming back to me via the dialogue box. However, I have no received any responses in my original document's tracking. When I tried submitting this new form myself to see what happened, I just received an message that says "Your response is being queued for submission", but it never tells you whether the form was actually submitted or not. Is there any way that you can track this form even though the file name has been changed? And if people are submitting their forms to me, where are they going?
Please help!
thanks,
desiree

I understand that you don't want to redo all the linking with the markers. You can try following (make a copy of your project first to be safe) :
- close your project and quit DVDSP
- move your old asset, and replace it with the new one
- reopen your project
A warning message should tell you that this asset has changed, but your marker will remain at old position. If the asset length are not the same, old length information will be used by DVDSP. To correct this, delete the asset from the timeline, and drop it back to the timeline.
Now you just have to move the marker to the right position.

The synth pad sound Warm Pad has changed after upgrading from Logic Express 7 to Logic Studio

Hello!
I have composed a lot of songs over the years using Logic Express 7, and my favourite synth pad sound there was a sound called Warm Pad (from the EXS24 Sampler).
A half a year ago I upgraded to Logic Studio, mainly because I needed WaveBurner. Happily, all my songs sounded exactly the same after the upgrade, except from 1 sound: The synth pad sound Warm Pad. It still got the same name and location, but the sound was replaced with a very sharp and much more distinct sound (not warm at all, in my ears at least).
I have tried to replace it with different synth pad sounds from the EXS24 Sampler, and the one I find to come most close to the old Warm Pad from Logic Express, is a synth pad sound called Pad 1. Still, I don’t think it sound exactly the same.
So, in order to finish all my songs and make an album, I ask you for help:
1. Do you know how I can get EXACTLY the same sound as the old Warm Pad Logic Express, with my new Logic Studio?
2. Have you experienced the same with sounds, after upgrading from one Logic version to a newer one? And what have you done to find back to the old sounds?
I will be VERY thankful for help, because I am not a genius in the mysterious (but yet exiting) world of synthesizer synthesis.
Best regards,
Asle
Composer, guitarist and entrepreneur
Norway

I have the boxed version of logic studio.
When you install, if you pick the "ad hoc" installation you can add the logic7 patches to your existing patches.
I think running installation again you should be able to install just that.

The optimizer changed after upgrade from 8i to 10g

I have upgraded my Oracle database from 8i (8.1.7.3) to 10g (10.2.0.3). After upgraded, there's some SQLs are with performance issue that the response time is very slow. The SQL can run very fast (around 1 seconde) in the pre-upgrade environment. Also, after generating the execution plan, there's different from the original enivronment (8i) which the query using some full table scan instead of index scan originally used in 8i.
The optimizer_mode of 8i is RULE and it's CHOOSE when upgraded.
My questions are:
1. Do I have any init.ora parameters setting in 10g environment which differ from 8i?
2. What method of analyzing tables is appropriate to use in 10g? Will this affect the performance like my case?
Thanks,
Wai

Please have a look to following threads:
Re: Optimizer Statistics collection after upgrade from 8i to 10R2
Re: DB upgrade from oracle 8.1.7 to oracle 10.2.0.2

Layouts disappear after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

HI friends ,
In the upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0 , the layouts in the SAP QUERIES in the new system are either lost or showing lesser fields than original system .How do get the exact layouts as in 4.6c?
Please help...
Many thnx ,
Hemanth .

Try using SQVI transaction .
Please reward if useful.

User Exit issue after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
After upgrade we are facing some issues regarding user exit. In 4.6c we have implemented several user exit to do customization in several module like SD,FI and HR. But after upgrade it has been identified that SAP has already provided this functionality in ECC 6.0. Now our problem is when this transactions are called or executed control is going to both custom and standard code. Which took long time to execute and causing performance issue.
Is there any ways to identify which are the functionality SAP has provided in ECC 6.0 so that we can delete our custom user exits.

Hi
List all the user exits which you have modified and check in OSS notes you will get the OSS note with all the details what functionality has been changed. Based on this you can delete or retain the user exits which ever you want.
Regards,
JB

Schema error after upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 5.0

Hi all,
We have recently upgraded from 4.6C to ECC 5.0. We are having problem in payroll run. When I did a syntax check in schema, I got "UDPM" rule doesn't exist. I checked, this rule is present in 4.6C. This is the standard rule. If I am right, it should have come with upgrade right?
or SAP has changed this? From where Can I get the info about this?
Also similar error I got in Function 'USTAX' parameter 3 is not allowed. If I remove that parameter, I don't know what is the implication of that.
I checked for SAP notes. I did not find anything.
Please let me know if any of you have come with such situation.
Thanks in advance.
Sarika.

Hi Sarika,
We are also in a similar transition i.e. 4.6C to mysap Ecc5.0 . But we are on Canadian Payroll.
I had search OSS and got a PDF document regarding " Upgrading to SAP R/3 Enterprize - A User Guide to Canadian mysap HR Customers" . U may be can find a similar one for US payroll. I can give u mine, but it wont be of any use as it is for Canadian Payroll.
In Canadian mysap Upgrade , the function P0224 has been replaced by function KXDTM . Although P0024 is still in used in Schema K00T for conversion purposes.
Regards,
Jay Gandhi

Transactions missing in Role After Upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hello Friends,
I did multiple searches on this question but it was unsuccessful. We are upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We are testing roles to make sure the migrate properly.
Irrespective of su25. There are transactions that are not obsolete and are missing in ECC 6.0
For example if I have a role called FIROLE. Which has 20 tcodes in 4.6c. When we upgrade to ECC 6.0 8 tcodes will be missing. This is not because the tcodes become obsolete.
What is the best way to approach this. Should we be testing each role?
Thanks!

Hello Imran,
transactions can be 'obsolete' also if they still exist.....
If the application developers create new functionality, new look,.... in new transactions but still let the 'old' ones in the system.
Just think about the ME2*-transactions..... The developer can decide, that such new transactions should replace the old ones after upgrade in the roles or let the old ones as they are.
You can get an overview about replaced/obsolete transactions by reviewing table PRGN_CORR2 (make sure, that you have the latest version, according to [SAP Note 991377|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/991377] !!!). SU25 gets its information from that table.
b.rgds, Bernhard

Asset query execution performance after upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0+EHP4

Hi,guys
I am encounted a weird problems about asset query execution performance after upgrade to ECC 6.0.
Our client had migrated sap system from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We test all transaction code and related stand report and query.
Everything is working normally except this asset depreciation query report. It is created based on ANLP, ANLZ, ANLA, ANLB, ANLC table; there is also some ABAP code for additional field.
This report execution costed about 6 minutes in 4.6C system; however it will take 25 minutes in ECC 6.0 with same selection parameter.
At first, I am trying to find some difference in table index ,structure between 4.6c and ECC 6.0,but there is no difference about it.
i am wondering why the other query reports is running normally but only this report running with too long time execution dump messages even though we do not make any changes for it.
your reply is very appreciated
Regards
Brian

Thanks for your replies.
I check these notes, unfortunately it is different our situation.
Our situation is all standard asset report and query (sq01) is running normally except this query report.
I executed se30 for this query (SQ01) at both 4.6C and ECC 6.0.
I find there is some difference in select sequence logic even though same query without any changes.
I list there for your reference.
4.6C
AQA0FI==========S2============
Open Cursor ANLP                                    38,702 39,329,356 = 39,329,356      34.6     AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     Opens
Fetch ANLP                                         292,177 30,378,351 = 30,378,351      26.7    26.7 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLC                                  15,012 19,965,172 = 19,965,172      17.5    17.5 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLA                                  13,721 11,754,305 = 11,754,305      10.3    10.3 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLZ                                   3,753   3,259,308 = 3,259,308       2.9     2.9 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLB                                   3,753   3,069,119 = 3,069,119       2.7     2.7 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
ECC 6.0
Perform FUNKTION_AUSFUEHREN     2     358,620,931          355
Perform COMMAND_QSUB     1     358,620,062          68
Call Func. RSAQ_SUBMIT_QUERY_REPORT     1     358,569,656          88
Program AQIWFI==========S2============     2     358,558,488          1,350
Select Single ANLA     160,306     75,576,052     =     75,576,052
Open Cursor ANLP     71,136     42,096,314     =     42,096,314
Select Single ANLC     71,134     38,799,393     =     38,799,393
Select Single ANLB     61,888     26,007,721     =     26,007,721
Select Single ANLZ     61,888     24,072,111     =     24,072,111
Fetch ANLP     234,524     13,510,646     =     13,510,646
Close Cursor ANLP     71,136     2,017,654     =     2,017,654
We can see first open cursor ANLP ,fetch ANLP then select ANLC,ANLA,ANLZ,ANLB at 4.C.
But it changed to first select ANLA,and open cursor ANLP,then select ANLC,ANLB,ANLZ,at last fetch ANLP.
Probably,it is the real reason why it is running long time in ECC 6.0.
Is there any changes for query selcection logic(table join function) in ECC 6.0.

My search engine has been changed to Yahoo from Google

I have a MacBook Pro and recently the search engine has changed to Yahoo from Google. How do I reverse this?

Please review the options below to determine which method is best to remove the Adware installed on your computer.
The Easy, safe, effective method:
http://www.adwaremedic.com/index.php
If you are comfortable doing manual file removals use the somewhat more difficult method:
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203987
Also read the articles below to be more prepared for the next time there is an issue on your computer.
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-7471
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-8071
http://www.thesafemac.com/tech-support-scam-pop-ups/

SQ01 query layouts has been changed after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for