SQLCE 3.5 for 64Bit Windows 8.1

I have a significant app and database that uses SQLCE v3.5 on 64 bit windows 8.1 but when I download SQLCE v3.5 it is not installable because I am told the files are corrupted. What gives and does anyone have any secrets? BTW...I've read this:
In some development scenarios it is necessary to include 64-bit SQL Server Compact 3.5 native DLLs in your project. For example, when you build an application that uses private deployment of SQL Server Compact 3.5 for a 64-bit target. If you are
developing in a 64-bit environment, these DLLs are available in the %Program Files%\Microsoft SQL Server Compact Edition\v3.5 folder. However, the 64-bit SQL Server Compact 3.5 Runtime cannot be installed in a 32-bit Windows environment, so the 64-bit DLLs
are not available in the default installation to the developer. Developers working in a 32-bit environment must download the 64-bit SQL Server Compact 3.5 Runtime Installer (SSCERuntime-ENU-x64.msi) and then extract its files. After extracting the files from
the MSI, you can include the 64-bit native DLLs in a project by browsing to the directory into which they were extracted.
To extract SQL Server Compact 3.5 DLLs from the 64-bit SQL Server Compact Runtime Installer
Download the 64-bit SQL Server Compact 3.5 Runtime installer (SSCERuntime-ENU-x64.msi) from
Microsoft SQL Server Compact 3.5 Web site.
Open a Command Prompt, and from the command line, create a directory in which to extract the files; for example,
md c:\x64.
Change to the directory to which you downloaded the installer; for example,
cd c:\InstallerDownloadDirectory.
On the command line, type msiexec /a SSCERuntime-ENU-x64.msi, and then press
Enter.
When you are prompted for the network location, enter the full path to the directory you created in step 3; for example,
c:\x64.If the directory you specify for the network location is
c:\x64, the 64-bit native DLLs are extracted to the following location: c:\x64\Programs\Microsoft SQL Server Compact Edition\v3.5\Microsoft SQL Server Compact Edition\v3.5"
Renee
"MODERN PROGRAMMING is deficient in elementary ways BECAUSE of problems INTRODUCED by MODERN PROGRAMMING." Me

"I think its because this SQL CE not supported in Windows 8.1"
How do you know that? The trouble is I have a well developed 64 bit database and application. I don't
know how i'd ever get the SQLCE data out of the database and into a plain sql database, This was initially the approach I considered but I was talked out of it.
Renee
"MODERN PROGRAMMING is deficient in elementary ways BECAUSE of problems INTRODUCED by MODERN PROGRAMMING." Me

Similar Messages

  • Capitvate 8 for 64bit windows downloaded, but "install now" button in akamai downloader has no effect. How to install?

    Capitvate 8 for 64bit windows downloaded, but "install now" button in akamai downloader has no effect. How to install?

    check your computer or, if you don't know how to search for files, redownlload:
    Downloadable installation files available:
    Suites and Programs:  CC 2014 | CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4, CS4 Web Standard | CS3
    Acrobat:  XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
    Premiere Elements:  13 |12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7
    Photoshop Elements:  13 |12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7
    Lightroom:  5.7.1| 5 | 4 | 3 | 2.7(win),2.7(mac)
    Captivate:  8 | 7 | 6 | 5
    Contribute:  CS5 | CS4, CS3
    Download and installation help for Adobe links
    Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages.  They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3.  If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.
    window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

  • Oracle Database Express Edition 11g for 64bit Windows

    Hi Folks
    Is it ok to install Oracle Database Express Edition 11g for 32bit windows on a 64 bit Windows 7 (Ultimate Edition) machine? I am not able to fiind a 64 bit Oracle Database Express Edition 11g, only standard edition. Hope someone can advise. Thanks.
    regards
    John

    Hi HuaMin Chen ,
    Thanks for the quick reply. I am not sure if I am reading you correctly. You are saying there it's fine to install the 32bit 11g express edition on a 64bit machine?
    regards
    John

  • EBS R12 release for 64bit windows

    I want to know, when oracle will release 64bit Windows version of EBS. since i am waiting for it quite long. Oracle announced that they will release in Dec2010 but it is now April 2011 and still no news about it. please give me links of future direction of Oracle about EBS. also if some one knows how to install EBS on windows7 64 bit please help me, i dont want to use Virtual Machines.?

    I want to know, when oracle will release 64bit Windows version of EBS. since i am waiting for it quite long. Oracle announced that they will release in Dec2010 but it is now April 2011 and still no news about it. It is doable by migrating an existing R12 installation on a 32-bit to 64-bit (not as a fresh install).
    Migrating Oracle E-Business Suite R12 to Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 [ID 1188535.1]
    E-Business Suite Release 12 Certified With Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 (Windows x64)
    http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2011/01/ebs12_win2008_r2.html
    please give me links of future direction of Oracle about EBS. also if some one knows how to install EBS on windows7 64 bit please help me, i dont want to use Virtual Machines.?Windows 7 is not certified as Application/Database tier nodes (only as a client tier) -- Is Windows 7 Certified With Oracle E-Business Suite? [ID 1103276.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • ITunes for 64bit Windows 7 Driver/CD/DVD/Drive Issues-

    Hi There
    I am sure that there are many many users out there suffering the same frustration as me in regard to ITunes just not working properly with Windoews 7 (64Bit).
    I have been trying to solve the mystery of "ITunes for Windows Registry Settings Warning When Opening Itunes.
    I have tried all the recommended actions to correct this problem without any success and I do mean ALL.
    Below is a screen shot of my registry, can anyone see anything wrong with it?
    In the meantime (Last four months) I have stopped using ITunes and instead have used Digital 7, this will be my very last attempt to get ITunes working properly, failure will mean consigning ITunes to the same place as any other Software that does not do wshat it says on the can.
    I hope someone can help.

    That's good that it is in device manager, but what about in Computer with the rest of the drivers?
    Also, are the drives listed in Computer and device manager or just device manager?
    I want to verify if the symptoms are present for a particular software issue before looking at other issues.  I really doubt it is a driver issue at this point.  If it was, then I suspect the issue would be present from day one. 
    It could be that the lens has dust buildup preventing it from working properly.  They do make CD cleaning kits that have a special CD designed to clean the laser as it passes over the lens.  If you happen to have one of these, or access to one, I recommend trying this step to make sure it isn't as simple as dust buildup interfering with the laser. 
    It could also be hardware failure, but I would like to try a few other steps before coming to that conclusion. 
    It may be worth reviewing this document as it covers a lot of the most common issues behind DVD drive issues. Feel free to skip any steps you have already tried. 
    Let me know what happens. 
    ↙-----------How do I give Kudos?| How do I mark a post as Solved? ----------------↓

  • Nikon D300 Raw files for 64bit windows vista machine not appearing in Photoshop CS3 raw

    I purchased a new 64bit computer running Vista. I have installed Photoshop CS3 including the latest updates and the 4.6 (Camera Raw.8bi) raw update file. I included the raw file in C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\Plug-Ins\CS3\File Formats. I have purged cache in Bridge and I still cannot view the raw files in Bridge. I only see a gray square with a Blue NEF. I can open the files in Photoshop however. What can I do to see the files in Bridge?

    Nikon encrypts RAW file data
    ByMichael R. Tomkins, The Imaging Resource
    (Wednesday, April 20, 2005 - 02:16 EDT)
    A news item posted on Sunday by PhotoshopNews.com reports on comments from Thomas Knoll, one of the original authors of Adobe Photoshop, relating to the RAW file format used in Nikon's D2X and D2Hs digital SLRs.
    <IFRAME src="http://208.43.255.194/cgi-bin/advertpro/banners.fpl?region=112&keyword=NULL" height="250" width="300" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" frameborder="0" align="middle" scrolling="no"> <A href="http://208.43.255.194/cgi-bin/advertpro/blink.fpl?region=112&slot=1" target="_blank"> <IMG src="http://208.43.255.194/cgi-bin/advertpro/bimg.fpl?region=112&slot=1&keyword=NULL" border="0" width="300" height="250" alt="Click Here!"> </A> </IFRAME>
    Thomas Knoll is currently the chief engineer for Adobe Camera Raw, the company's RAW file conversion software. The PhotoshopNews item references a forum thread started by Mr. Knoll in Adobe's official user forums, where he reveals that .NEF RAW files from the latest Nikon digital SLRs encrypt data relating to the white balance setting the photo was shot with.
    RAW file formats vary significantly between digital camera manufacturers (and often, between different models in a manufacturer's lineup), and the manufacturers generally won't publicly disclose the specification for the RAW file format(s) they use. Some will offer plugins or software development kits (SDKs) that enable their RAW files to be opened in third-party applications, but these generally have some limitations attached to their use.
    In addition, the companies generally offer RAW file conversion software of their own, either as part of their camera bundles or as an added-cost option. Nikon offer their pro SLRs with PictureProject software that includes limited control over the RAW file conversion process, and then offer the more feature-rich Nikon Capture conversion software for an added cost. In a recent publication on the company's Nikon Pro website, it suggested that it feels Nikon Capture is better-suited to photographers, while Adobe's Photoshop is more suited to graphic artists. Still, different photographers have different workflow preferences, and for this reason third parties such as Adobe often reverse engineer the RAW file formats, allowing them to be opened in their own software - sometimes with even better image quality than the original manufacturer's software.
    In a way, it is understandable that companies would want to encrypt RAW file data from their products - it allows them to pick and choose which competitors are able to open RAW files shot with their products, and allows them to generate new revenue streams from the sale of their own RAW file conversion software (or, if they choose, the sale of licenses allowing competitor programs to access their RAW file data). Nikon is not the first company we're aware of to encrypt data in RAW files; Sony's Cyber-shot DSC-F828 RAW files contain encrypted data. In that instance, however, Sony granted permission for Adobe to decrypt the data in their software. At the current time, Mr. Knoll states that while Adobe has signed a non-disclosure agreement that grants them access to use Nikon's SDK, they have not received any response to requests from Adobe that the company be allowed to decrypt the white balance data, which would allow closer integration with their software than is possible with the SDK.
    The fact that Nikon has chosen to encrypt a portion of the RAW file data would not be particularly problematic for third parties to overcome, were it not for certain laws enacted around the world in recent years. One such law is the United States' "Digital Millennium Copyright Act", often referred to as the DMCA, which makes it illegal to produce technology that can circumvent measures designed to protect copyright. One could argue that Nikon's encryption of the white balance data is just such a measure - which would make it an offense for a third party without permission to make software that could decrypt the original white balance setting used by the camera when the photo was shot. One could equally argue, however, that the copyright over the RAW file belongs to the photographer who captured the image - and hence the choice over what is done with that copyrighted work is entirely up to the photographer.
    Unfortunately, there's no clear-cut answer, and short of a company or programmer finding themselves in court for having cracked the encryption, there isn't likely to be such an answer any time soon. This presents a problem for third parties attempting to make their own RAW file conversion routines for the D2X and D2Hs, as if they don't want to risk opening themselves up to legal action, they aren't able to determine the original white balance setting. Hence, they must either request the white balance setting from the user as the RAW file is converted, or attempt to determine an appropriate white balance setting automatically (which would not necessarily be the same as that determined by the camera itself).
    Nikon hasn't communicated their reasons for encrypting the white balance information in their latest NEF formats, but we have to say it doesn't sound like a very good idea. While Nikon Capture does indeed offer excellent capabilities for people to manipulate images saved in NEF formats, many photographers and organizations have already established workflows based on Adobe's RAW plugin for Photoshop and other image-processing tools. The biggest consequence of this move on Nikon's part seems likely to be to push more photographers onto other camera platforms. It's hard to imagine that increased sales of Nikon Capture will make up the revenue lost from camera and lens sales going forward.

  • FireFox 4 is slow for 64bit Windows 7

    Hello,
    Ive been using FF4 for over a month now with my old laptop using Windows Vista - 32 bit.. But my laptop recently crashed so I got a new one with Windows 7 - 64 bit. I installed firefox 4 and readded all my bookmarks manually because there was no way to import my old profile. Anyway, the whole browser is running really slow, even typing this message, there is like a delay between what I type and when it shows up in this box. Also opening new tabs, its very laggy and happens a few seconds after I click the new tab button. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling. Even tried reinstalling the US version. But its still running slowwwwww. Everything else on the computer runs super quick, including IE. I tried disabling all the add-ons and extensions in firefox but still no luck. Maybe its some trick by microsoft to get everyone to use IE again. But I really want to use firefox because of all the addons. Can someone please help me. I've seen plenty more of these questions asked on Google but its always about people who have too many add-ons or something. This is a brand new install, on a brand new computer.

    kavlito, I'd love to help you with your Firefox speed issue if you'd like. I'd suggest (since this is an old thread) that you start a new one at [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/new https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/new].
    But, before you do that, I'll suggest a couple of resources that should help make Firefox a bit faster :)
    First, see if starting Firefox in Safe Mode helps. [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues using Safe Mode]]. This mode temporarily disables all custom Firefox settings so that you can see if any of them are causing the problem.
    If all is good in Safe Mode, try to update your graphics driver, [[Upgrade your graphics drivers to use hardware acceleration and WebGL]]. Hardware acceleration helps speed up Firefox, and an older driver can cause issues sometimes.
    Finally, you can try to install Firefox Beta, which has several speed improvements, as well as changes to scrolling that might fix your problem. [http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/beta/ http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/beta/]

  • Need drivers for 64bit Windows 7

    Hi I have a 845PE Max2 board and for some reason I can't find the drivers for 64 bit Windows 7. Is it not compatible with it? Any advice? Thanks in advance.

    BarKode,
    (If you ever come back) have a read of this sticky topic: https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=129409.0

  • ODAC install for 64bit Windows 7

    I am looking for an ODAC installer that I can run on Windows 7 64 bit. I have the 11.2 client installed already, but I need to compile a .net app. I installed the 64 bit client (Oracle 11.2) and then installed the ODAC 11.2 beta, but it turns out it is 32 bit and can't be loaded when I am running the 64 bit client. Is there one available?

    Hi,
    The ODAC bundle is indeed 32 bit. There will be a 64 bit 11.2 ODAC when it goes production, maybe as soon as late this month.
    If you have a full 11.2 client installed, you should already have 11.2 ODP.net installed. What install type did you do? Administrator? Runtime? Custom? etc. If for some reason you didnt install ODP.NET into your existing 11.2 full client home, you should be able to go back and add it via selecting Custom install type and choosing ODP.NET from the full client install media.
    Hope it helps,
    Greg

  • Thumbnails for 64bit Windows 7. It is now 2009.

    I have been running 64-bit desktop operating systems for 5 years now (yes I started late) including Windows XP 64-bit, Windows Vista 64-bit and now Windows 7 64-bit. For 5 years I have been reading people's posts all over the internet, asking when Adobe will make pdf thumbnail previews in explorer available in a 64-bit environment. (I have also been listening to people screaming for a 64-bit flashplayer for 5 years now).
    I have heard many people try to blame it on Windows, but we all know that this is not the case. pdf documents created or downloaded on a 32-bit machine (of any flavour) and then transfered to a 64-bit machine, WILL display as a thumbnail in explorer. pdf documents created or downloaded on a 64-bit machine (of any flavour) WILL NOT display as a thumbnail in explorer.
    Like I say, I have only been following this for 5 years now.
    Being able to see thumbnails of your pdfs is quite possibly the simplest, and yet one of the most important functions of either acrobat or reader to so amny people.
    Can anybody tell me when Adobe will start to support 64-bit operating systems?
    After all, it is now 2009 and very nearly 2010.

    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • Itunes for 64bit windows

    While installing the itunes 11.1 for 64 bit windows, it gives error and ask to run the installation program again. But same error resurfaces.

    Is there a process to update my iTunes. I've used this gear driver and it's worked GREAT for a long time, but when and if I ever update my iTunes it breaks this and I've tried uninstalling/reinstalling gear, reverting back to the same version of iTunes and completely reinstalling both but nothing seems to work. Is there a good process to revert back and reinstall iTunes and the gear driver?

  • CSA for 64bit Windows

    Will this ever be available? We are migrating most of our servers to 64bit and as we do, I'm gaining CSA server licenses, but losing the protection. New management here doesn't like CSA to begin with, so this is just another nail in it's coffin. Any information would be helpful.

    Are there any HIDS that work on 64-bit Windows XP/2003/Vista? I thought there was an issue with the Patch Guard technology that prevented them from working. Has that been resolved?
    http://www.gcn.com/print/25_31/42323-1.html

  • Can I run OAS in 64bit Windows 2008?

    I'm going to install the OAS in our 64bit Windows 2008 for evaluation, however, both the x86 and win64 file cannot be installed.
    The following message is prompted when we attempt to install the win64 version:
    The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running.  Check your computer's system information to see whether you need an x86 (32-bit) or x64 (64-bit) version of the program, and then contact the software publisher.
    And the following message is prompted inside a DOS prompt when we attempt to install the x86 version:
    Checking operation system version: must be 5.0, 5.1 or 5.2 .   Actual 6.0    Failed <<<<
    Existing Oracle Universal Installer, log for this session can be found at C:\.......
    We can only install the OAS in a Windows XP workstation, does it mean that we have to use a Windows XP workstation as production server?
    May I know if there has any OAS download for 64bit Windows Server 2008?

    Not exactlly. Maybe it's certified now, but still cannot install.
    According to the update:
    1. Windows 2008 is supported with patchset 10.1.3.4 or higher. Before applying the 10.1.3.4 patchset, customers must first install the base 10.1.3.x products using the following patches:
    . 10.1.3.1.0 SOA requires patch 6712338 (http://updates.oracle.com/download/6712338.html)
    . 10.1.3.2.0 WebCenter requires patch 6971010 (http://updates.oracle.com/download/6971010.html)
    . 10.1.3.x Companion CD requires patch 7129052 (http://updates.oracle.com/download/7129052.html)
    . 10.1.3.x Companion CD ASG Install requires patch 7129469 (http://updates.oracle.com/download/7129469.html)
    . 10.1.3.x Companion CD Failsafe Install requires patch 7191497 (http://updates.oracle.com/download/7191497.html)
    Additional notes for Windows 2008:
    . The patches listed above apply to both 32 and 64 bit versions of Windows 2008.
    . Please review the release notes on http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12524_01/relnotes.1013/e12523/install.htm#sthref7 for the 10.1.3.4 patch set for known issues for Windows 2008.
    But....
    1. 10.1.3.4 still not avaialble for direct download, you have to download 10.1.3.x then apply the patch. But the download of 10.1.3.x cannot be installed, how can we apply the patch?
    2. You cannot download the patch without Metalink account (maybe, it's not for evaluation at this moment)
    So, it still have to wait until the full package of 10.1.3.4 or above is available for direct download.

  • Detection of MS 982726 for 64bit Office not correct

    Was trying to figure out why the filter update for 64bit windows is showing
    up for all our devices when we are using 32 bit Office 2010. Checked out
    the debug.log and noticed both the 32 and 64 bit detections of the patch are
    looking in the same location. The 64 bit should not be looking in the
    'Program Files (x86)' but in 'Program Files'
    Filename : [MS 982726 Outlook 2010 Junk E-mail Filter Update (December 2012)
    (All Languages) (64Bit).pls]
    OS Platform : [Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64]
    Library Build : [5.2.2][Sep 25 2012 16:01:07]
    Finished Importing
    Detecting
    File [C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\OUTLOOK.EXE]
    File Version Found: [14.0.6109.5005], Check Against: <= [15]
    File Version information within specified range
    File [C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\OUTLOOK.EXE]
    File Version Found: [14.0.6109.5005], Check Against: >= [14]
    File Version information within specified range
    File [C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\OUTLFLTR.DAT]
    File Version Found: [14.0.7605.1090], Check Against: >= [14.0.11829.524]
    File Version information NOT within specified range
    Finished Detecting
    Opening file:
    MS 982726 Outlook 2010 Junk E-mail Filter Update (December 2012) (All
    Languages).pls
    Importing
    Filename : [MS 982726 Outlook 2010 Junk E-mail Filter Update (December 2012)
    (All Languages).pls]
    OS Platform : [Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64]
    Library Build : [5.2.2][Sep 25 2012 16:01:07]
    Finished Importing
    Detecting
    File [C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\OUTLOOK.EXE]
    File Version Found: [14.0.6109.5005], Check Against: <= [15]
    File Version information within specified range
    File [C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\OUTLOOK.EXE]
    File Version Found: [14.0.6109.5005], Check Against: >= [14]
    File Version information within specified range
    File [C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\OUTLFLTR.DAT]
    File Version Found: [14.0.7605.1090], Check Against: >= [14.0.11829.524]
    File Version information NOT within specified range
    Finished Detecting
    Jim Koerner
    Server - ZCM 11.2.2 w/MU1 and Internal Database on Win2008R2x64
    Client - ZCM 11.2.2 w/MU1 on Win7SP1x64

    I will, but my track record on patch fixes is pretty dismal. My system
    management patches on 64bit machines SR has been going on for 8 months but
    supposedly fixed in 11.2.3 and a most other patch SRs were multiple months.
    That’s the main reason I laid off new SRs for them.
    They seem to have a real low priority which I can understand if you are
    talking about a single patch with issues.
    Jim
    "Shaun Pond" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    Jim,
    can you open SRs for these? It's the quickest way to get them updated
    Shaun Pond

  • HT1926 This version of itunes is meant for 32bit windows not 64bit windows. Please download 64bit.

    Ok so I have downloaded it on three different browsers and disabled popup blocker and restarted and this is still coming up with this version is meant for 32 bit windows, please download 64bit windows version. how do i fix this?

    Kinda obvious but are you downloading the 64bit version of iTunes for Windows as noted at the bottom of the iTunes download page?
    -> iTunes 10.6.1 for Windows (64 bit)

Maybe you are looking for