Sqlloader loads data very slowly

I've got simple table in async. multimaster environment (Oracle 9i on Linux RH AS2.1) and nonreplicated table with the same structure. When i load data with sqlloader into nonreplicated table it takes 30sec and the same load into replicated table lasts 15 minutes. When i queried v$system_event, i've seen that
knpc_anq_AwaitNonemptyQueue event (with
total_waits=1170
time_waited=6785856
average_wait=5800 ) is leading in average_wait.
It looks like repl.triggers and def.queue making the process realy slow.
How can i speed up data load? Maybe some special replication events ought to be monitored?
Thanks in advance!

Natalia if u find the solution of your problem than mail me at [email protected]
Secondly with sqlloader while i insert the data into the table it does'nt move to materialized view log and i m unable to go for fast refresh .....Do you hv any way to push the data into materialized view log so i can go for fast refresh .

Similar Messages

The FireFox Browser loads itself very slowly and makes me wonder if it is loading at all. Is there something that can be done to speed up the FF Browser loading?

FF Browser 5 loads itself very slowly and takes so long with no sign that it is loading that many times I will click it again and later find that it has loaded itself twice.
Is there anything that I can do to speed the start-up of this browser?
It seems that if there is not a way to load this browser faster that FireFox would make an add on that would show us that the Browser is in process of loading at the very least. Thank you for your kindness in any way for help in this regard. Best Regards
Sincerely Walt

cmauze2 wrote:
Ann154 wrote:
What happened to your old SIM card? You should have been able to move that card to the new replacement device.
[quoted]:
"Sales clerk asked me if I had a Sims card for it. I told him that there`s one in my old phone. He explained to me that it was not going to be working..."
Or were you referring to the one in the old temporary replacement device? Would that even be compatible with the newer phones?
The one that wasn't working had a 4G LTE SIM card in it. It should have usable in the replacement Razr. It was only until I read the OP a third time this morning that there might be a third device involved. It would be nice if people would give more specifics on what devices are active at what time. Then the readers of this community can follow the progression of the events better.

My iPod loads songs very slowly

I had some trouble with the battery-life of my iPod, and I thought erasing the whole iPod would cure this, so I've resetted it. After doing this, my iPod, upon connecting it with my PC (Sony Vaio notebook - Windows XP SP2), started loading songs very slowly. Whereas the transfer of a song used to last a fraction of a second, now a song takes up to 30 sec to be transferred. At this speed, uploading my +4000 songs takes ages.
I've already installed the latest version of iTunes (6.0) and the iPod updater, but nothing seems to help.
I've connected the iPod to another computer where the iPod was originally linked to. On this computer an old version of iTunes (4.5) was installed and some songs. The transfer went OK. So the problem was with my Sony Vaio.
I've disabled Norton Internet Security and Norton Antivirus from the Sony but this made no difference.
Could there be a problem with my firewire-connection to the iPod ? How can I speed it up ? I would certainly appreciate it if someone out there could help me. Many thanks in advance.

Have you tried another USB port?
Another computer?
Another Cable?
A wall charger?
Also see the not charging topic of:
iPod touch: Hardware troubleshooting

Firefox is loading pages very slowly, most of times saying server not found. Same pages loaded quickly in ie9. Previously FF used to load pages fast. FF version 8.0.1, windows vista & windows XP.

firefox is loading pages very slowly, most of times saying server not found. Same pages loaded quickly in ie9. Previously FF used to load pages fast.
FF version 8.0.1, windows vista & windows XP.
Please help
Generally we dont get any reply to the questions asked here!

65kid wrote:https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=162327
Thank you for the link, but I am not sure how this is going to help me: I am not booting straight to an X session, but prefer to log into TTY1 and have my login shell handle everything from there.
Here is the relevant part of my .zprofile:
if (( UID )); then
[[ -z $DISPLAY && $XDG_VTNR -eq 1 ]] && exec systemd --user
fi
As far as I understand, your method works if I enable the [email protected] template when actually booting straight to X.

My iPad 2 loads pages very slowly

My iPad 2 loads pages very slowly, especially on Facebook . It used to load instantly, now can take a minute or longer.

Try using the Facebook app instead.

Adobe Acrobat Standard 9.3.1 loads pages very slowly with Windows XP 64 bit version

Our company has purchased Dell Precision T3500 workstations with Intel XEON processor and 6 Gb of RAM. The operating system is Windows XP 64-bit version. The systems came with Adobe Acrobat Standard 9.3.1. Each one of these workstations load PDF files into Acrobat very slowly. Does anyone have a answer why?

Quote
Originally posted by Some1ne
Here's a step-by-step description of how to install the RealTek RTL8169/8110 driver, as the process isn't quite as straightforward as it should be:
1. Download the Windows AMD64 Drivers available here:
http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloads1-3.aspx?series=16&Software=True
2. Extract the files in the archive to somewhere like c:\win64drivers\ethernet
3. Once inside Win XP 64, do the following:
a. Click Start -> Settings -> Control Panel -> System -> Hardware -> Device Manager
b. Go down to the "Other Devices" section (they'll have yellow ?'s)
c. Right click on the ethernet controller and click "Update Driver"
d. Click "Install from a list or specific location (Advanced)"
e. Click "Dont search. I will choose the driver to install."
f. Double click the "Network Adapter" entry, and then click "Have Disk..."
g. Select the directory which you extracted the driver files to
i. You will get messages saying that Windows cannot verify that the driver matches your hardware, and that the driver is not WHQL certified. Ignore these and click "Continue"/"Install Anyways" and your RealTek RTL8169/8110 ethernet adapter will spring to life
after i have done this the pc just stops. and if i reboot it stops at the loading screen :/ can you tell me whats wrong i got a k8t neo serie card and windows 64 bit edition
edit: i did it :D works now

Firefox 28, 29 and 30 load pages very slowly - Google Chrome is OK on the same PC...?

Windows XP SP2 on a Dell Precision 340, Pentium 4, 2GB RAM, two GeForce MX4000 graphics cards, AVG Internet Security 2014. Broadband connection with download speeds up to about 27Mb/s.
I get the same symptoms on a homebuilt system with an almost identical spec.
Internet pages with any graphics at all load very slowly. Reliable websites like BBC News can take at least 30 seconds to open, making Firefox unusable for surfing.
Google Chrome, on the same PC, opens the same pages in about 4 seconds.
Firefox running under Ubuntu Studio 9, on the homebuilt PC, is also fine, so I don't think it's my internet connection.
Firefox 30, on Windows 7 64-bit Professional with Norman Endpoint Security, is fine on my work laptop.
What's slowng down Firefox 30 on my Windows XP machines please?

Sorry you are having problems. Thanks for a good descriptive post. There is a testcase; see under; does the globe spin slowly ?
Just a hunch at the moment but maybe the problem described in this thread.
* ''Firefox is unbearably slow after updating to version 27'' [/questions/985969]
** summary [/questions/985969?page=3#answer-546599]
** my general comments [/questions/985969?page=3#answer-546520]
* Useful page as '''testcase''' globe should spin at 15 RPM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rotating_earth_%28large%29.gif
Not engineers have now started to investigate so there may be further news later in the week
There is a testcase as above.
Bugzilla used for bug tracking and reporting
*Please only vote though do not add comments unless it is brand new information, or it is something asked for in the bug.
** https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=voting.html
**https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html
**[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=973149 Bug 973149 - Animations cause CPU Kernel mode overhead]
**Follow by using CC You are able to follow the bugs by using the [Save] option whilst the []CC option is checked.
** Note you need an email address to register with bugzill and that will be made public

Query is returning data very slowly

Hi,
Please advise for the solution. Thanks in advance.
The problem is that the queries returning data very very slow.
Let me explain further, There is one major table that is storing master data (Main Transaction) and its detail data (Child Records) and further detail of the detail data (Child Records of the Child Records) and so on sometimes upto 5 or 6 levels in the same ONE big table called "TRANSACTIONS_TABLE" table.
Therefore, mostly my quries are self joins like
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(10) */ JUDG.ID JUDG_ID,
SE.ID SE_ID,
CS.ID CS_ID,
CS.CS_DATE,
CS.CS_J_ID,
CS.CT_ID,
C.ID C_ID,
C.TRANSACTIOIN_TYPE_ID C_TRANSACTIOIN_TYPE_ID,
C.TRANSACTIOIN_NO,
C.TRANSACTIOIN_YEAR,
C.TRANSACTIOIN_DATE,
C.SUBJECT,
C.UNIT_ID,
(SELECT U.NAME_N FROM ORG U WHERE U.ID = C.UNIT_ID) PRC_UNIT_DESC,
C.E4 NO_AL_QAZYA_ID,
SELECT T.DESCRIPTION
FROM prc_charge_categories T
WHERE T.ID = TO_NUMBER(C.E4)
) NO_AL_QAZYA,
C.CREATED_BY
FROM TRANSACTIOINSACTION_TABLE C,TRANSACTIOINSACTION_TABLE SE, TRANSACTIOINSACTION_TABLE JUDG, DEF_TABLE CS
WHERE C.ID = SE.PARENT_ID
AND SE.ID = J.PARENT_ID
AND SE.TRANSACTIOIN_TYPE_ID = 63755
AND J.TRANSACTIOIN_TYPE_ID = 63424
AND J.E1 = '3'
AND CS.ID = TO_NUMBER(SE.E9);
23 rows selected in 48.672 seconds
I run the below query on this table
select transaction_type_id,count(*) total_rows
from transactions_table
group by transaction_type_id
order by 2 desc;
transact total_rows
114893     1192544
63755     774132
62270     682361
63424     633046
65220     515605
67728     457831
84928     378754
58806     296351
64240     277624
65244     275267
67224     152061
112610     123796
67434     116100
65824     88787
61369     76196
62269     74821
61740     67085
56448     56185
65703     55336
99601     54552
64423     49368
61478     43187
101689     39372
61652     38196
67136     27713
61364     25790
97961     23610
65380     19811
56353     18910
65618     18309
57041     16808
98137     15837
101794     14618
100127     14118
98916     13691
112735     13082
117349     11930
69334     11462
99064     10291
67811     10151
69402     9142
112753     8243
95950     7390
68902     6900
119474     6693
65659     5972
68360     5862
66198     5690
118340     5161
62012     4490
71088     4050
112040     3864
57315     3047
112031     2957
57289     2891
112039     2523
112038     2446
114254     2269
55550     2242
119926     2225
69650     2135
65033     1343
119078     811
69788     780
115133     774
116390     578
114968     549
65575     521
64290     412
120026     403
67388     359
116340     249
66847     228
98524     144
68214     138
120459     105
118777     92
79395     87
116039     79
65768     67
118376     58
120906     57
55848     52
58983     50
61195     48
68134     29
66645     24
55992     23
69037     21
70379     21
56674     20
112019     20
68911     18
70206     17
66028     16
114335     11
69555     7
55849     6
57122     6
65034     5
60496     5
57273     4
56286     4
55563     4
56972     3
55542     3
70654     3
55999     3
56721     3
57138     2
117802     2
57005     2
61058     2
116351     2
57096     2
57075     2
95136     1
115210     1
117601     1
68298     1
56939     1
65935     1
61739     1
65611     1
71249     1
57010     1
95024     1
68406     1
57097     1
122206     1
57062     1
132 rows selected in 5.266 seconds
Immediately, I again run this same query
132 rows selected in 5.079 seconds
then again
132 rows selected in 2.672 seconds
then again
132 rows selected in 4.438 seconds
then again
132 rows selected in 2.684 seconds
The structure of this table is
CREATE TABLE transactions_table
ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
PARENT_ID NUMBER,
TRANSACTION_TYPE_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
TRANSACTION_YEAR NUMBER(4),
TRANSACTION_NO NUMBER(8),
TRANSACTION_DATE DATE NOT NULL,
C1 VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
C2 VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
C3 VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
LONG_C1 VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
LONG_C2 VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
LONG_C3 VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE)
TABLESPACE TS16K_DATA
PCTUSED 0
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 1
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 3144M
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
NOCACHE
NOPARALLEL
MONITORING;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX MOJ.EVN_PK_I ON transactions_table
(ID)
NOLOGGING
TABLESPACE TS16K_INDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 168M
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
NOPARALLEL;
CREATE INDEX EVN_EVN_TYP_I ON transactions_table
(TRANSACTION_TYPE_ID)
NOLOGGING
TABLESPACE TS16K_INDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 136M
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
NOPARALLEL;
There are 150 COLUMNS in this table and out of which there are 33 columns data type is VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE) and others NUMBER datatype and some are VARCHAR2(255 BYTE)
As from above, the index on TRANSACTION_TYPE_ID is not unique and not bit map but a normal index.
Further there are no partitions for this table.
Many of the database views based on this table return results after several minutes.
* Around 5000 to 8000 rows are entered in this table on daily basis and is it feasible to create partitions and modify indexes to bit map and vice versa where ever required because already this table is having 54 Indexes including composite ones.
Please help and advise.

When your query takes too long ...
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

SQL loader load data very slow...

Hi,
On my production server have issue of insert. Regular SQL loder load file, it take more time for insert the data in database.
First 2 and 3 hours one file take 8 to 10 seconds after that it take 5 minutes.
As per my understanding OS I/O is very slow, First 3 hours DB buffer is free and insert data in buffer normal.
But when buffer is fill then going for buffer waits and then insert is slow on. If it rite please tell me how to increase I/O.
Some analysis share here of My server...................
[root@myserver ~]# iostat
Linux 2.6.18-194.el5 (myserver) 06/01/2012
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
3.34 0.00 0.83 6.66 0.00 89.17
Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
sda 107.56 2544.64 3140.34 8084953177 9977627424
sda1 0.00 0.65 0.00 2074066 16
sda2 21.57 220.59 1833.98 700856482 5827014296
sda3 0.00 0.00 0.00 12787 5960
sda4 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sda5 0.69 2.75 15.07 8739194 47874000
sda6 0.05 0.00 0.55 5322 1736264
sda7 0.00 0.00 0.00 2915 16
sda8 0.50 9.03 5.24 28695700 16642584
sda9 0.51 0.36 24.81 1128290 78829224
sda10 0.52 0.00 5.98 9965 19004088
sda11 83.71 2311.26 1254.71 7343426336 3986520976
[root@myserver ~]# hdparm -tT /dev/sda11
/dev/sda11:
Timing cached reads: 10708 MB in 2.00 seconds = 5359.23 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 540 MB in 3.00 seconds = 179.89 MB/sec
[root@myserver ~]# sar -u -o datafile 1 6
Linux 2.6.18-194.el5 (mca-webreporting2) 06/01/2012
09:57:19 AM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
09:57:20 AM all 6.97 0.00 1.87 16.31 0.00 74.84
09:57:21 AM all 6.74 0.00 1.25 17.48 0.00 74.53
09:57:22 AM all 7.01 0.00 1.75 16.27 0.00 74.97
09:57:23 AM all 6.75 0.00 1.12 13.88 0.00 78.25
09:57:24 AM all 6.98 0.00 1.37 16.83 0.00 74.81
09:57:25 AM all 6.49 0.00 1.25 14.61 0.00 77.65
Average: all 6.82 0.00 1.44 15.90 0.00 75.84
[root@myserver ~]# sar -u -o datafile 1 6
Linux 2.6.18-194.el5 (mca-webreporting2) 06/01/2012
09:57:19 AM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
mca-webreporting2;601;2012-05-27 16:30:01 UTC;2.54;1510.94;3581.85;0.00
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 16:40:01 UTC;2.45;1442.78;3883.47;0.04
mca-webreporting2;599;2012-05-27 16:50:01 UTC;2.44;1466.72;3893.10;0.04
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 17:00:01 UTC;2.30;1394.43;3546.26;0.00
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 17:10:01 UTC;3.15;1529.72;3978.27;0.04
mca-webreporting2;601;2012-05-27 17:20:01 UTC;9.83;1268.76;3823.63;0.04
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 17:30:01 UTC;32.71;1277.93;3495.32;0.00
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 17:40:01 UTC;1.96;1213.10;3845.75;0.04
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 17:50:01 UTC;1.89;1247.98;3834.94;0.04
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 18:00:01 UTC;2.24;1184.72;3486.10;0.00
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 18:10:01 UTC;18.68;1320.73;4088.14;0.18
mca-webreporting2;600;2012-05-27 18:20:01 UTC;1.82;1137.28;3784.99;0.04
[root@myserver ~]# vmstat
procs -----------memory---------- -swap -----io---- system -----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
0 1 182356 499444 135348 13801492 0 0 3488 247 0 0 5 2 89 4 0
[root@myserver ~]# dstat -D sda
----total-cpu-usage---- dsk/sda -net/total- -paging -system
usr sys idl wai hiq siq| read writ| recv send| in out | int csw
3 1 89 7 0 0|1240k 1544k| 0 0 | 1.9B 1B|2905 6646
8 1 77 14 0 1|4096B 3616k| 433k 2828B| 0 0 |3347 16k
10 2 77 12 0 0| 0 1520k| 466k 1332B| 0 0 |3064 15k
8 2 77 12 0 0| 0 2060k| 395k 1458B| 0 0 |3093 14k
8 1 78 12 0 0| 0 1688k| 428k 1460B| 0 0 |3260 15k
8 1 78 12 0 0| 0 1712k| 461k 1822B| 0 0 |3390 15k
7 1 78 13 0 0|4096B 6372k| 449k 1950B| 0 0 |3322 15k
AWR sheet output
Wait Events
ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
Event Waits %Time -outs Total Wait Time (s) Avg wait (ms) Waits /txn
free buffer waits 1,591,125 99.95 19,814 12 129.53
log file parallel write 31,668 0.00 1,413 45 2.58
buffer busy waits 846 77.07 653 772 0.07
control file parallel write 10,166 0.00 636 63 0.83
log file sync 11,301 0.00 565 50 0.92
write complete waits 218 94.95 208 955 0.02
SQL> select 'free in buffer (NOT_DIRTY)',round((( select count(DIRTY) N_D from v$bh where DIRTY='N')*100)/(select count(*) from v$bh),2)||'%' DIRTY_PERCENT from dual
union
2 3 select 'keep in buffer (YES_DIRTY)',round((( select count(DIRTY) N_D from v$bh where DIRTY='Y')*100)/(select count(*) from v$bh),2)||'%' DIRTY_PERCENT from dual;
'FREEINBUFFER(NOT_DIRTY)' DIRTY_PERCENT
free in buffer (NOT_DIRTY) 10.71%
keep in buffer (YES_DIRTY) 89.29%
Rag....

1)
Yah This is partition table and on it Local partition index.
SQL> desc GR_CORE_LOGGING
Name Null? Type
APPLICATIONID VARCHAR2(20)
SERVICEID VARCHAR2(25)
ENTERPRISENAME VARCHAR2(25)
MSISDN VARCHAR2(15)
STATE VARCHAR2(15)
FROMTIME VARCHAR2(25)
TOTIME VARCHAR2(25)
CAMP_ID VARCHAR2(50)
TRANSID VARCHAR2(25)
MSI_INDEX NUMBER
SQL> select index_name,column_name from user_ind_columns where table_name='GR_CORE_LOGGING';
INDEX_NAME
COLUMN_NAME
GR_CORE_LOGGING_IND
MSISDN
2) I was try direct but after that i was drop this table and again create new partition table and create fresh index. but still same issue.

Adobe Illustrator & Adobe Photoshop CC Loads & Saves Very Slowly

I've encountered this problem after I have upgraded from Mountain Lion to Mac OSX Mavericks. Both Photoshop and Illustrator loads very slow and when I save my files in either program, it really takes so much time.

Jeff,
We had tried on multiple operating system and also with latest updates done , same issue persists ,current version is 14.2.1 x64 , Photoshop stops responding once brush size in increased about 1000px.
All latest update were installed via creative common cloud.
Regards
Deepak.

Firefox 4.0 loads pages very slowly - will this be fixed soon?

I upgraded to version 4.0 and it is much slower in page loading then any of your previous versions. Are you going to be fixing this problem soon? Or do I need to look for a different web browser to use... Very disappointing! So much for FASTER than before - NOT!

It will work again if McAfee does a full update...

LSP causes firefox to load pages very slowly

I'm a developer for a company that produces content filtering software. Our filtering component is an LSP that monitors network traffic. For some time now, we've been experiencing periodic issues with Firefox and our LSP.
This is not a crash, and Firefox is not frozen. But when you try to load a page, Firefox comes to a point where it just spins trying to access the same socket over and over again. Clearly our LSP is doing something that Firefox doesn't like, but eventually Firefox breaks out of the spinning and loads the page.
I'd like to know if there is someone involved with Firefox development that I can communicate with to resolve this issue.

Hi coverton,
I did pm you:
You may not easily see this. Initially I do no want to answer your question on the forum, as an answer may then deter others from replying. This is not something that I understand but my suggestions are:
you say for some time you have had a problem 
if this is a Firefox regression which version did it occur on 
file a bug on bugzilla https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi#h=dupes|Firefox
 or you may in fact find it is a known issue, an example of a bug fixed in Firefox 13 is
 Bug 712363 - SSL connections do not work correctly when not managed by the socket transport service (including especially when the socket is not non-blocking)
 have a look through the mailing lists and forums you may find a useful one http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/
 also consider looking on the various mozillazine forums http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php
This sort of problem is probably slightly outside the range of problems we attempt to solve on this forum.
My view is that basically if the problem clearly does not exist in one version of firefox, but does from a certain later version then there was some sort of change, and if that was not intentional it is a regression and appropriate to file a bug for. ( If the change was intentional there will almost definitely be a bug filed documenting the change. )
If you do post a bug suggestions would be
* First try it in the latest nightly just in case the problem was fixed. http://nightly.mozilla.org/
*Try to narrow down a regression window, so please test in Firefox 10 and 11.
*There is a tool for narrowing down regressions by automatically downloading a bissected range of Nightly builds and running them in turn with a dialogue to confirm or otherwise that there is a problem (last time I tried the tool I had a problem with it but it was probably user error, or is now fixed )
** see https://github.com/mozilla/mozregression
Obviously you will need to rule out that it is due to changes in third party software, and to demonstrate the problem you will need some reproducible steps, so it could be appropriate to try discussing the problem on a forum in order to build some sort of test case prior to filing a bug.
As you have asked here it would be useful to know what happens so please post back if you file a bug or find a forum or mailing list that provides a solution.
Good Luck
P.S. I note you filed '''''Bug 756216 - LSP Causes Firefox to Load pages slowly '''''

BI publisher returning data very slowly

Hi BI gurus,
I have quite afew reports in BI publisher that pulled a huge volume of data ( transactional data from OLTP systems). My clients want these data in excel format. Now the problem I am facing right now is that, when the report query is ran, it spools huge dump files in the server that crashes the server :(.
So what should I do to tackle this.
1. Data has approx 50,000 + rows
2. I am using both the sql query format and the data template format.
Is this the problem of my query or is there any limit on the amount of data that BIP can pull, is there anyways i can pull the data faster changing some modes, or enabling the multithreading or something ??
Well I have exhuasted all avenues and I am going nuts.....
So would Appreciate any help i get......
thanks
Suvha
Edited by: 857501 on May 9, 2011 5:37 PM

When your query takes too long ...
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

Firefox and Thunderbird are using a lot of memory and load pages very slowly!

CPU levels are going through the roof when using Thunderbird and Firefox.
Both programs are freshly installed on a new and also freshly installed version of windows 7!
Loading of my pages is taking forever and most pages don't load at all.
My email is [email protected]
My notebook got so hot that it turned itself off!
Memory is above 250 KB for firefox and Thunderbird above 150 kb!

I do not have a ComObjects folder under C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files. That is not part of Firefox.
wscript.exe is a utility included with Windows to run scripts at the system level. It generally is not used by major programs. If update.exe is starting up with Windows, you may be able to find the script that wscript.exe is running using [http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963902.aspx Autoruns].
It definitely sounds viral. I suggest deleting the update.exe file, although Windows might prevent you from doing that until you kill all related processes. And if you have a persistent infection, the file may be restored or re-downloaded.
It might be easiest to seek assistance from a forum more dedicated to malware cleanups such as the following:
* [http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/forum22.html Virus, Trojan, Spyware, and Malware Removal Logs - BleepingComputer.com]
* [http://forums.majorgeeks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=35 Malware Removal - MajorGeeks Support Forums]
Hope you get it removed.

Pages on Safari not completely rendering/loading and very slowly.

I own an iPhone 5 which was on 7.1.2. I updated to 8.1 on release and everything seems fine except for one major issue. Safari seems to strangely only render certain parts of pages. This is especially noticeable on pages with many images and links. Safari also seems to load pages a bit slower as well as videos in general, but the main problem is if you try to load a page with lots of pictures or elements, parts of them will not load and will be blank. I did not have this issue on 7.1.2.
Please note that I have already factory restored the iPhone 5 as brand new, and have no loaded or installed anything onto it at all while testing this.
I took an iPhone 4S I own which is still on 7.1.2, and on the same exact WiFi network, was able to load the page completely. While my iPhone 5 on 8.1 misses a few links. This happens everytime I load a page, the iPhone 4S on 7.1.2 loads the whole page, the iPhone 5 on 8.1 misses some. Not only this. The iPhone 4S, an older iPhone with a weaker CPU and less RAM loads pages much FASTER. I was BLOWN AWAY at how much faster my old iPhone 4S was loading pages than my iPhone 5. When my iPhone 5 was on 7.1.2 it was always faster.
It may not seem noticeable at first, but when you load that first busy webpage, you will notice that it does not all come up, and Safari no longer has the "spinning" wheel which says its trying to load.
This also carries over into Chrome and other third party web browsers which try to render web pages.
Can anyone else confirm this issue? I regret updating to 8.1 at this point, new keyboards aren't worth a device which will not load an entire web page. If you're reading this its probably too late, but in case you haven't, DO NOT UPDATE from 7.1.2 (or 8.0.2 if this was an issue then) if you value Safari being fast and accurate. Lets hope Apple fixes this.

I'm still seeing random reports about this, can anyone else confirm? I wonder if its device specific not everyone has the issue, but my 4S on 7.1.2 is still beating my iOS 8.1 iPhone 5 on the same Wi-Finetwork and not having issues with not loading all images on screen.

Sqlloader loads data very slowly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for