SR_ Extended Classic Scenario : Request your help please

Hi Guru's,
We are implementing the EXTENDED CLASSIC SCENARIO in our project. kindly request your help.
in our project the SRM box is : G3OSBSR102.
R/3 backend Box is : RCHSBR3142.
Now when i create a shopping cart it should create the Purchase order In SRM( G3OSBSR102) and also copy the created purcahse order in teh backend system : RCHSBR3142.
The issue here is which Logical system should be populated in the field at item level when creating the shopping cart :BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
1) In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
If i populate the SRM local: G3OSBSR102., then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2201and creates the local Po but while transfering this local created document(PO) to R/3 system is loosing the Logical system at the item level of the PO.
If i populate this field at the item level via DEBUGG mode then system is sucessfull in transferring the document to R/3.
2) In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
If i populate the SRM local: RCHSBR3142, then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2012 and creates the purchase order in R/3 system and will not create teh local purchase order.
Kindly request your help for any further settings if i did miss.Appreciate your help in this regards.
Many Thanks,
Prasad NN.

Hi ,
Go to SPRO
There is a node - Activate Extended Classic scenario
Do the config.
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Similar Messages

SRM: Extended Classic scenario: Request your help.

Hi Guru's,
We are implementing the EXTENDED CLASSIC SCENARIO in our project. kindly request your help.
in our project the SRM box is : G3OSBSR102.
R/3 backend Box is : RCHSBR3142.
Now when i create a shopping cart it should create the Purchase order In SRM( G3OSBSR102) and also copy the created purcahse order in teh backend system : RCHSBR3142.
The issue here is which Logical system should be populated in the field at item level when creating the shopping cart :BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
1) In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
If i populate the SRM local: G3OSBSR102., then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2201and creates the local Po but while transfering this local created document(PO) to R/3 system is loosing the Logical system at the item level of the PO.
If i populate this field at the item level via DEBUGG mode then system is sucessfull in transferring the document to R/3.
2) In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
If i populate the SRM local: RCHSBR3142, then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2012 and creates the purchase order in R/3 system and will not create teh local purchase order.
Kindly request your help for any further settings if i did miss.Appreciate your help in this regards.
Many Thanks,
Prasad NN.

Dear Prasad,
To work on Extended Classic Scenario, you just have to maintain the following configuration in SPRO:
>SAP Supplier Relationship Management
>SRM Server
>Cross-Application Basic Settings
>Activate Extended Classic Scenario
Check the flag "Extended Classic Scenario Active".
You dont have to manipulate "BE_LOG_SYSTEM" field to choose your scenario.
Regards
Thiago Salvador

IMovie Newbie requests your help please!

Newbie Questions
I am a 3D artist so I render my images from the 3D software rather than shooting on video. I have rendered out my animation as images dog01.bmp, dog2.bmp, dog3.bmp etc. You get the idea! Well there are 271 .bmp images each 1mb in size = 271 MB. I tried importing them into iMovie and it took 2 minutes to import all of them.
Q1. I read the "iMovie Getting Started .pdf" but it wasn't clear as to what to do with a collection of images. What do I do once I have loaded all 271 images of my images into the "Clips" section of iMovie?
Q2. I noticed my images have a black bar above and below them. What can I do to fix this?
Image Type: .BMP
Image Size: 800 x 450 pixels (Is this size too big for imovie?)
PPI: 72
Frame File Size: 1 MB (Is this size too big for imovie?)
No. of Frames: 271
Total file size (272 images) = 280 MB
Q3. I can render my 3D animation in the following formats so can you tell me what formats are best?
-Animation
-Apple Intermediate Codec
-Apple Pixlet Video
-Apple VC H.263
-BMP
-Cinepak
-Component Video
-DV-PAL
-DV/DVCPRO-NTSC
-DVCPRO-PAL
-DVCPRO50-NTSC
-DVCPRO-PAL
-Graphics
-H.261
-H.263
-H.264
-JPEG 2000
-Motion JPEG A
-Motion JPEG B
-MPEG-4 Video
-None
-Photo-JPEG
-Planar RGB
-PNG
Your help is appreciated!

a) you do yourself a favour, and choose in iM's prefs "import to timeline"... your clips go direct to timline, no hand-dropping of 271 (pheww!!) pics needed
b) dropping a folder of pics onto QTpro allows the conversion into a dv stream
c) if you anim app allows export as "video" choose "dv PAL/NTSC" (appropiate video standard in your country)
hope that helps...

Extended classic scenario - PO print output

Hi all,
Please help me. We have SRM 5.5 (SAPKIBT11) the extended classic scenario.
Could you please tell me Can I print the PO from Web GUI?
If in the Web GUI Output area in PO I set indicator Printer, and to set in Output Pushbutton, in Log I have status - Successfully processed. In trx SP01 the spool status - Compl. But the PO smartforms don't print.
PS: from Output Preview button I can to print the PO smartforms, but I need to print from Output area through the Output Pushbutton. (in the trx BBP_POC or BBP_PPF).
Best regards
Guzal.

Hi, Masa,
Thank you for your advice,
I set the method U:Print Using Berkeley Protocol, after that
in trx. SP01 I have the Error Status on Composite Document -
Status Incorrect (Reason Unknown).
Best regards,
Guzal.

Cost distribution in Extended classic scenario

Hi All,
We are in SRM 4.0 using extended classic scenario.
When we create a purchase order with cost distribution, it gets copied to backend system. But the partial invoice field in backend PO is always having the value "Distribution in sequence".
In configuration for account assignment category, it has been defaulted to "Distribute proportionately".
When we checked with SAP they told that for SRM POs it will always be distribute in sequence. It has to be distributed while posting MIRO. This value is hardcoded in SRM PO transfer program. It is very strange and moreover this is a essential functionality which needs to be in SRM.
Any one using extended classic scenario, could you please tell me how you are handling multiple account assignments?
Please help me.
Thanks,
Arun

Friends,
If you are using cost distributions in extended classic scenario, then could you please check and let me know the value that you are getting in the "Partial Invoice" field in Account assignment tab of backend PO.
Please help.
Thanks,
Arun

Extended Classic Scenario PPOMA_Purchasing Org and Group

Hi gurus,
We are working with SRM 5.5 and we are having problems with the assignments for the Purchasing organization and Purchasing groups in the PPOMA.
In the documentation it says we should have one box for the R3 Purchasing Organization (flagged and referred to the backend POrg) and one for the Local Purchasing Organization (flagged but NOT referred to the backend POrg). The same for the Purchasing Groups, the one under R3 POrg will be flagged and referred to the PGroup in R3 and the one under the Local POrg will have the flag but it will not be referred to the backend PGroup.
Afterwards, in the attributes for the Local POrg and Local PGroup, with the attributes PURCH_ORGX and PURCH_GRPX the local and the R3 POrg and PGroup will be assigned each other.
The purchasers will be located in the Local PGroup. The R3 POrg and PGroup will never have users assigned.
The problem is that all the workflow is only working if the "Local" POrg and Group have the backend purchasing organization and purch group assigned in the Function Tab. This means that the 2 boxes for R3 are no longer necessary. In the documentation it says that this version of SRM needs both boxes for the POrgs and the 2 boxes for the PGroups. We have flagged the Extended Classic Scenario.
Any help on this? It's because of the version?
Many thanks and regards,
I will give Points!

Hi Ana
PURCH_GRP     Purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing group in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as company on the Function tab.
PURCH_GRPX     R/3 purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing group in the organizational plan. The value contains the ID and the associated backend system of a backend purchasing group.
This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
PURCH_ORG      Purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as purchasing organization on the Function tab.
PURCH_ORGX     R/3 purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
can you elaborate more?
in ECS also we can map the backend purchase organisation/ purchase group for purchasing activity.
there might be a resposibilty tab for the backend purchase group might be mapped the responsible purchaser list (dept).plz check it up
regards
Muthu
regards
Muthu

Extended classic scenario local PO Output status

Hello all ,
Need some inputs on extended classic scenario local PO Output.
My requirement is , when ever the put get process successfully in SRM , I need to send a mail to requester saying that u201C for this particular output got processed successfully u201C
I have business requirement, we need to run this report every 30 min, This report has to pull out the all the PO number from the current time to past 30 min, for the output got processed successfully.
To meet this requirement, I am using the output log entry table PPFTTRIGG where we can see the all the PO with the status and time stamp also.
But some how, this table maintaining incorrect time stamp.
Ex: If I create PO, process the PO output, and if I see the time stamp for this PO, its showing as 10 min before the current time.
Did anybody come across this issue? Or can anybody suggest me any alternative approach for this.
I mean is there any function module/ table available, which will give PO Output status also.
Can you please give me any pointers for this?
Seeking your help on this.
Wish you a advance happy new year.
Thank you.

Hi Latha,
Did you have a look at the standard report RSPPFPROCESS. For PO's please pass the below selection screen values along with the appropiate date & time details:
Application = BBP_PD
Action Profile = BBP_PD_PO
Then regarding the time difference, please make sure that the application server time is sync with the actual time of the time-zone. This could also be a reason.
Then what you can do is to clone the RSPPFPROCESS program and add the email notification logic on that.
Please have a look at the BADI BBP_PROCESS_PO, this can be of some help for your requirement.
Hope this solves your problem.
Regards
Kathirvel

Extended classic scenario to Classic scenarioc in SRM.??

someone pls tell me how to change from Extended classic scenario to Classic scenarion while creating in shopping cart...?
I am using BADI "BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI" change to classic scenarion from extending classic..but i got confused about source code..So i request any one can help me for suitable source code..

Hi
Do you mean to say that you have set up Extended Classic Scenario but you want to change it to Classic Scenario?... If this is the case, remove the activation in COnfiguration for Extended classic scenario and deactivate BADIs you ve implemented for Extended Classic
OR
Do you want to change it to Classic only for the Document user is creating.--> Read the indicator or data from SC and decide whether the document has to be in Classic or Extended classic SCenario.... The BADI will either have Extended classic = X or NOT.... so there is no parameter for classic Scen... Depending on your requirements, implement the ext. classic badi to SET it or NOT set it...
Regards
Virender SIngh

Extended Classic Scenario - PO Update issue

Hello experts.
We are working with SRM 5 in the extended classic scenario and we have a serious problem in a productive environment for the following case.
(01) We create a purchase requisition (PR) in R/3 with several items;
(02) We send PR to the SRM generating a shopping cart;
(03) The buyer creates a PO for all items from the shopping cart;
(04) The PO is transmitted to R/3;
(05) For some cases buyer changes the PO wich is sent back (updated) to R/3;
So far so good. The problem happens when some item in the request already has GR or Invoice. In those cases when the PO is updated on SRM, its transmission to R/3 does not occur, generating an error log that can be seen in transaction RZ20 of SRM.
I understand that if any GR or Invoice exists for the item it can no longer be modified, but is it expected that no other item can also be modified from SRM? What is the expected behavior for this case?
Moreover, even if the GR and Invoice have been canceled, we are still unable to update the PO in R/3 from SRM. Is this a expected behavior? It was our understanding that the PO should be updated if all incoming documents (GR, Invoice, SES ..) were completely canceled.
We appreciate any help on this matter.
Thanks and Regards,
Evandro Miasato

Hi, Masa,
Thank you for your advice,
I set the method U:Print Using Berkeley Protocol, after that
in trx. SP01 I have the Error Status on Composite Document -
Status Incorrect (Reason Unknown).
Best regards,
Guzal.

Extended classic scenario local PO

Hi All ,
Need some inputs on the extended classic scenario local PO.
There is couple of functionality which we need to do for the PO. I mean when the PO gets created automatically after shopping cart completely approved
We can change the same PO from the process purchase order also.
But if I want to map couple of the fields, when PO is getting created automatically how can do that one. And I donu2019t want map these fields when the PO is from the getting changed process purchase order also.
I am using the BADI, BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI (PO_CHANGE Method) to map these fields.
The thing is here , this BADI will call even for the automatic PO creation and also for changing the PO .
Currently when I noticed PO gets created automatically by the user id u201CWF_BATCH u201C , So I am using the same the logic like .
If sy-uname = WF_BATCH
Do the mapping part
Endif,
But I donu2019t think so; this logic will work all the times.
Please can anyone give me some pointer for the same, it will be really helpful for me .
Seeking your help on this
Thank you,

Hi Latha,
This is a bit tricky one. Yes you are vry correct, the logic is not that fool proof, as the PO can be subjected to so many changes back & forth; even approvals can be done after a change is completed etc.
The other alternative is to go ahead the document version. You can use the function module BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL and the table E_VERSION will contain all the versions of the PO. This should differentiate the change & initial PO verions.
Hope you can build your logic based on this; this is a better logic on par with the existing one.
Regards
Kathirvel

Configuration steps for Extended Classic Scenario

Hi All,
Could you please let me know what are the configuration steps required for extended classic scenario.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Important Settings that Determine the Extended Classic Scenario
The following settings are required for the extended classic scenario:
u2022 At least one backend materials management system and accounting system is connected to the SAP SRM system and defined in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
u2022 Product categories from the backend procurement system are replicated and used in the SAP SRM system.
u2022 The target system for each product category is the backend system in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems for Product Category. Optionally, BADI BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS is implemented to determine the backend system.
u2022 The extended classic scenario is activated in the configuration setting Activate Extended Classic Scenario. Alternatively, BAdI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI is implemented to control the extended classic scenario based on customer defined rules.
u2022 If the backend system is an SAP R/3 version lower than 4.6B, you must define local purchasing organizations and purchasing groups.
u2022 If the backend system is an SAP R/3 version 4.6B or higher, you need to map the purchasing group used in the purchase order to the backend purchase group in one of the following ways:
u2022 Use a backend purchasing organization and purchasing group in the shopping cart and purchase order.
u2022 Use BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND to determine a backend purchasing group in the shopping cart.
u2022 If a local (created in SAP SRM without reference to a backend system) purchasing group and purchasing organization are used, then a valid backend purchasing group is assigned to the RFC user that created the backend purchase order. This assignment is made in the backend system using user parameter EKG in Transaction code SU01.
u2022 Implement the user exit of the BAPIs BAPI_PO_CREATE1 (EXIT_SAPL2012_001 and EXIT_SAPL2012_003), and BAPI_PO_CHANGE (EXIT_SAPL2012_002 and EXIT_SAPL2012_004) to determine the purchasing group with a customer- specific logic.
This is for your additional information.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Vikas

PO status Held in extended classic scenario

Hello SRM gurus,
         I am very new to SRM with MM background. I have a question which i think you guys might have come across earlier.
We are using version 5.5 extended classic scenario, replicated all the vendors and materials from R/3 to SRM, did all the basic configuration needed, we are able to see those vendors and materials in SRM also. here is the issue. we are trying to add an item to the shopping cart which in turn creates a PO in SRM so that it automatically replicates in R/3. But the PO status in SRM is Held and we found out that vendor is not assigned to the PO which is very clear why the PO has been held. So what could be reason the vendor is not getting assigned to the PO though we have the inforecord and source list(checked the fix indicator also)for the same material and vendor in R/3 ?
I'm sure many of u would have come across this issue. please help me out.

Hi Satya
      Thanks for your quick response.
1) We are using Workflow without approval process
2) I checked BBP_NUM_SUSPO in SRM server. There is nothing in there. Is this the correct number range for PO? I checked OMH6 in R/3. please tell me how to sync it.
   When we try to post it after editing the PO with vendor number, we are getting Waiting for approval error though we have activated Without workflow approval process. let me know why is it showing that error?
We have another strange issue which is, We have assigned a material say M01 to a pur.group P01,Pur.org POrg1 and vendor V01 and have info record and source list, but we don't see this Pur.grp when we create the shopping cart and it defaults to some other pur.grp say AP01 which we deleted long back. can you tell me where it is picking up the deleted ones?
thanks
Pradheep.

Sourcing of GOA in Extended Classic Scenario

Hello all,
We are using the <u>extended classic scenario</u> with both Purchase Contracts and Global Outline agreements.
Is it possible to use the GOA in the back-end as a source of supply in the sourcing transaction in SRM? What setting do I have to use exactly?
Kind regards,
sander

Hi
Which SRM and R/3 versions are you using ?
I guess, the following threads will help.
<b>Source determination in backend (R/3) for distributed contract i.e. GOA
Transaction For Creating GOA
Distribution of GOA in R/3
FM or BADI s' used to create a GOA
GOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution
Hope this will help.
Please reward full points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Question on Purchasing documents in extended classic scenario

Hi friends
How to create local purchasing documents i.e po,confirmations,invoice, in extended classic scenario
Please let me know the path
regards
venkat reddy

Hi Venkat,
The user interface and the process is same for local documents. However the result of document posting (either backend or local) depends on the setting in SPRO --> SRM --> Technical basic Settings --> Define backend system for product category.
Here you can define the target system as the system of document posting. If the terget system specified here is your SRM system, then it will create local documents in SRM.
Regards,
Prashant
Do reward points for helpful answers

SC with Limit Item using Extended Classic Scenario?

Hello,
Can we implement SC with Limit Item using Extended Classic Scenario.
I mention that we replicate the Product Categories from R/3 backend.
We have tried to create a SC with Limit item, but the data on Quantity, Price and Tax is not picked up at PO level.
Regards,
Shaiek

Hi
Please try out this.
For the time-being,
Try de-activating all the custom BADI Implementations and check, what is happening, in the standard SRM system. How does it behave incase of limit item ?
Incase it works fine, without any Custom Implementation active in the system, I suspect there is something wrong in your current deactivated BADI Implementation.
Since i don't have access to your system , Please paste the code here.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

SR_ Extended Classic Scenario : Request your help please

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for