SRM 7.0 Invoice posting issues, validation
Hi Experts ,
We are configuring SRM7.0 with ECC6 ( Ehp4) having Classic Scenario .
1. In Std SRM , we can post Invoice both ways
With ref to PO
W/o ref to PO.
We don't want to post Invoice w/o refernce to PO. How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error).
2. We had NOT actiacted "Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Account" in ECC Invoice Config. But in SRM, If we post any invoice w.r.t. PO and add some extra line item, than system do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000112 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its ststus shows "Waiting from preceeding document".
How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error)?
3. We are using GR based IV in PO.
If for any PO , GR is not done
User tried to post the invoice in SRM, system gives error message that "Precessing document req for invoice is not availble", but if I POST it , system proceeds it with green color message "Invoice 80000000113 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "Waiting from preceeding document"
If PO Qty = 100, GR= 20, IR =100 Qty
System 1st give error Message
Line 1 : Qty too high ( Tol Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
Line 1 : Value too high ( Tol Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
And after that if user POST it, then system just do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000057 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "To be Corrected Manually". How this can be stopped ?
I believe , by using DOC check or ITEM Check BADi this can be done , Can anyone suggest there is another way ?
Thanks
NAP
Thanks Ranjan,
1. No there is no any Portal Link for Invoice w/o PO. In the Portal for SRM BP, same single link displays from which we can post both Invoice w.ref to PO and w/o PO.
2. Since we do not want user to make mistake. System should stop him and do not allow if PO is not refered or IR Qty > GR Qty.
Do anyone have any inputs.
Thanks
NAP
Similar Messages
-
SRM 7.0 invoice posting error in EP
Hi
We are using SRM 7.0 standalone scenario
When u r trying to post Invoice in EP it is gving error "Alteast one PO refernce is incorrect or you have no authorisation"
But we are able to post the same invoice from SRM through T-Code BBPIV03.
What could be issue.
Regards,
NNKThanks Gururaj
Role
Technical Name
RFx Respondent (also referred to as Bidder)
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_bidder
Component Planner
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_componentplanner
Employee Self-Service
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_employeeselfservice
Goods Recipient
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_goodsrecipient
Invoicer
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_invoicer
Manager
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_manager
Operational Purchaser
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_operationalpurchaser
Purchasing Assistant
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_purchasingassistant
SRM Administrator
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_srmadministrator
Strategic Purchaser
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_strategicpurchaser
Supplier
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_supplier
Supplier Survey Cockpit
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_survey_owner
Supplier Survey Cockpit
com.sap.pct.srm.core.ro_survey_reviewer
br
muthu -
Hi Experts,
We are working on SRM 5.0 . Few days back new support pack 'SAPKIBKT14' was implemented.
After this we are trying to post the invoice based on PO in SRM. we entered the PO number and clicked on 'Insert',
then it should display the item details as well as 'Invoicing party' & 'Vendor' details. But here in my case
'Invoicing party' & 'Vendor' details are not displaying, only items details are displaying.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
ChanduHi,
The invoice is created in SRM but it doesn't replicate, Have you checked the inbound IDOC in your backend (Tx we05)
In the status segment you should see the error.
I hope this help
Best regards -
hi
I have created one PO and two different (two times) GRN done for same po however at the time tof inoice posting (MIRO) with refeence to first DC, system has display full qty of grn (sum of two different dc qty).
can you help the same issue.
reg
mrshI,
You would have posted the grn for the PO with the GR Based invoicxe verification check in the PO.If the PO is checked with the box GR based invoice verification in the invoice tab, then system will show you the partial GRs happed with DC in the MIRO screen when referenced.
Refgards, -
Limit Order Shopping Cart Invoice posting issue
Hello Experts,
I am not able to post invoice for LIMIT ORDER SC(I am using Extended classic scenario); using MIRO when i enter PO no. in the specified field ; in the line item both the amount & quantity appears as zero. and it does not allow to change or edit. Ideally it should allow the posting of invoice but with block payment.
The same thing i tried for "Describe requirement SC" and it allowed me for posting invoice even without GR/Confirmation.Hi,
You can enter the Invoice, remove the GR/IR based invoice indicator from the invoice tab of the PO line item.
thanks
Padhi -
Baseline date not getting populated from SRM invoices posted to ECC 6.0
Hi,
We are currently in ECC 6.0. The SRM system is in 4.0. We have this particular problem that the baseline date is not getting populated from the Invoices posted from the SRM. The baseline date is blank and the document is saved.
Did anyone face the same problem??? Can you please refer SAP note 541934 and expand........
Thanks
Aravind
Edited by: Aitipamula Aravind on Aug 10, 2009 5:13 AMHello,
Yes, you could check the attached note 541934 and regard the implementation of the field ZFBDT in the invoicing document.
Note 541934 provides a solution how to achieve the MM-customizing for payment baseline dates getting effective for invoices with SRM-origin. This note needs to be applied at your ERP-MM-side in the former plug-in-layer. As described in the note, this is a modification. It's recommended to apply in non-productive system first.
Hope the above infor.are helps for you!
Best Regards,
Gladys xing -
SRM Invoice posting without PO reference - Contract Management
Dear experts,
We are on SRM 701 with ECC 6.0, in ECS.
Our requirement is to allow invoice posting in SRM, without PO reference. The invoice will only refer to an existing SRM central contract.
We did all the relevant customizing and we were able to:
Replicate SRM central contract to ERP, through PI;
Invoice creation in SRM and posting in the backend (FI), through IDOCs.
As far as I understood in this scenario, the invoice posting is made only through FI (not using MIRO).
My expectation was to have the contract number in some field at the invoice document level, in the FI. However there is absolutely no reference to the contract in the invoice document. Does anyone know if this is a standard behavior and/or any idea of how to achieve my requirement to have the contract number in the invoice posting?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
AndreiaHi guys,
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks!
Andreia -
Invoice posting is not triggering idoc message in EBP to FI backned ECC6
Hi ,
We are working on classic scenario with SRM 5 having EBP and SUS on separate clients on same srm system.
Now we are extending standlone scenario for selected product categories .
We have created product master ,product category & vendor master in SRM EBP client. Defined below settings
1.Define Sourcing for Product Categories -local
2.Define Objects in Backend System -EBP of type Local
3.Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignmet
We are able to create Shpping cart ->purchase order( local)->confirm goods & invoice for local product
With central ccountant authorization employee user has created the invoice and resulted status of invoice as
"Currently Being Transferred" , expected to post the invoice in ECC system but after invoice idoc is not getting generated in SRM in order to transferred to backend ?
I have tried and in debug mode found that ,Logical System of Logistics Backend is wrongly
attached to invoice ie instead of ECC logical system it is appearing SRM Local logical system . After changing the
backend value for invoice header -BE_LOG_SYSTEM from srm to ecc backend & executed
FM-BBP_PROCDOC_TRANSFER for particular invoice ,Idoc Basic type BBPIV01 is generated and passed to ecc.
But not able to identify why wrong "Logistic backend " is appeared in invoice. we have below attributes maintained in
Employee
Accounting System for Vendor VENDOR_ACS DSRCLNT254(SRM local)
Company Code BUK 100
Cost Center CNT 430900
System Alias SYS LOGSYS250
System Alias for Accounting Systems ACS DSRCLNT254
System Alias for Vendor VENDOR_SYS LOGSYS250
Vendor
Accounting System for Vendor VENDOR_ACS LOGSYS250(ECC)
Company Code BUK 100
System Alias for Vendor VENDOR_SYS LOGSYS250(ECC)
Kindly help me to post the invoice to ECC backend ,Thanks Sheetal,
We have classic scenario in place so ECC system (LOGSYS250 ) is defined as backend system of type- ERP_2.0 &
FIvalid- realtime backend validation .
We are using ECC is the accounting system defined in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
Note: More to add that Invocie idoc generated after backend logical system correction in invoice header data of SRM ,
it is posting invoice successfully in eCC backend . So data correction for logical system value is seems some problem with standlone scenario configuration .
We have validating this scenario for selectd product categories as with SRM 5 version in place, customer is intrested to use Invoice management system ie. invoice should be validated with exceptions in SRM before posting to ECC.
We have EBP & SUS in different client on SRM system ,so in existing classical scenario invoices created in SUS against ECC backned purchase orders is not flowing to IMS in EBP . Can you help me to validate the scenario ?
Regards,
Santosh
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 2, 2009 1:51 PM
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 5, 2009 11:37 AM
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 9, 2009 7:38 AM.
Issue is resolved . It is the System Alias for Accounting Systems setting in organization module .
Now with completion of workflow idoc message-BBPIV is generated in SRM and successfully posting in ECC.
Thanks a lot for your inputs . -
Returm Delivery Possible Despite ECC Invoice Posted
Hi forum gurus,
We are implementing SRM 5.0 (SRM SERVER 5.5 and are on SP 12) in the extended classic scenario.
We have a test issue where we created a PO for 10 items, fully GRN'd the PO and then posted an invoice against the PO in ECC (no blocks on th invoice).
We can then see the 'Return Delivery' button is active and the return delivery can be posted from SRM despite the invoice having been paid.
Having tested ECC this also seems to be the case if we were to create the PO, GRN and invoice all within MM.
Can you tell me?:
1. Is this correct logic?
2. Can we change ECC finance or MM config to stop this (I know there is config to stop this being possible for GR-Based IV PO items, but what about normal items)
3. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what is best practise in this case and why?
Thanks a lot,
Best regards,
NickHi. In SRM you can easily use the BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI to prevent this by issuing an error.
In ECC you can use MB_MIGO_BADI method CHECK_ITEM to issue an error.
Regards,
Dave. -
Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code
Hi:
We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
Qty 10
Price 100
Value 1000
Excsie 10% 0
Cess 0
SECess 0
Value+Excise 1000
VAT 5% 50
ValueExciseVAT 1050
(Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
Qty 10
Price 100
Value 1000
Excsie 10% 100
Cess 2
SECess 1
Value+Excise 1103
VAT 5% 55.15
ValueExciseVAT 1158.15
We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
24340000 Paper Stock BSX 1,000.00
13110100 GR/IR-ext proc WRX 1,000.00-
We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
100183 SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA) KBS 1,050.00-
13110100 GR/IR-ext proc WRX 1,000.00
24638100 VAT Recoverable JP5 50.00
The Material was issued to Cost Centre
Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
24820020 CENVAT Inp SHEcess 1.00
24820000 CENVAT Inp BED 100.00
24820010 CENVAT InpEcess 2.00
13113920 CENVAT clearing 103.00-
My Question:
a. Is this the correct way?
b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
100183 SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA) KBS 1,158.15-
13110100 GR/IR-ext proc WRX 1,000.00
13113920 CENVAT clearing JI1 100.00
13113920 CENVAT clearing VS9 2.00
13113920 CENVAT clearing JI6 1.00
24638100 VAT Recoverable JP5 55.15
Please guide.
Regards,Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.
Regards,
PK -
Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,tax rate?
Hi Experts
tax rate (June)=22%
tax rate (july)=24%
issue is Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,so sytem taking tax rate =24% instead of 22%.Because outbound delivery is happened in June.
Please let me know that,
1)how system picking tax rate on base like billing date or service render date or ...?
2)how to take tax rate (june)=22% in July posting.
regards
sachinTax Rate is picked based on the pricing date.
You need to check with your SD collegue to configure the pricing date to be equal to outbound delivery date to pick the outbound delivery date based tax rates.
Regards,
Gaurav -
F-28 incoming Invoice Posting Discount Splitting
Hi All,
I am using BDC for F-28 T Code to post incoming Invoice posting
but the issue is while posting the discount amount if i send 60 Rs through file it is splitting into 30 and 30
Not exactly 50-50
I am unable to get on what basis the amount is splitting.
I hvae to asssign Cost and Profit Center to the Discount amount .
But how many parts the Dicount amount is splitting is th issue.
Pls Help Me.
regards
Venu Madhavpls. send u r code if possible..
Thanks,
Mahesh Kumar. -
Service PO with Freight/ Insurance Condition- Invoice posting
Hi,
I'm using ECC6.0 version. I'm getting one problem in External Services Procurement.
Issue is:
1. Created a Service PO. Item Detail level, maintaines 1 text service with 10 Qty @ 50 INR.
2. In PO item Conditions tab, maintained Insurance condition (which is created by copying Frt. Condition FRB1) with say Rs. 100/-. Actually this should be levied on the overall item level at item overview Qty (i.e. 1 AU).
3. I made Service Entry, Acceptance.3.
At the time of Invoice posting, when I choose Goods/Services+ Plannd Del. costs, system proposing 5,000 ( 10 qty x 100 inr), instead of showing 100 inr. i.e. system proposing sub item qty times insurance.
Is there any setting to control this price?
Regards,
KanthHi Sujit,
We can't maintain it as Header Condition because for service PO just like other POs, some times we may maintain more than 1 item which covers different Rates.
Please check my scenario
Has anybody got similar problem? -
Hi .. i,m facing an issue with intercompany Invoice posting .
I'm having delivery note as a reference to that invoice but im getting error message that delivery note doesnot exist..
i have entered correct delivery note..
how this can b overcome?
Thanks and regards..
Manojhi,
for having del. note as ref in MIRO, first you must have entered the same del. note while making GR (MIGO), then only that is possible.
Have you done that,
other wise PO ref is the best & will work anyway
Regards
AK -
Best practice for invoice posting inSRM
Dear expert,
what is the best practice for posting an invoice? Is it in SRM system or MM system? In SRM, the system allows one to use approval procedure for invoice posting; wheras in MM, one cannot use the apporval procedure to post an invoice. similar is the case, in SRM-SUS and MM-SUS scenario?
I would appreciate if you can feedback on the industry practice.
thanks and regards,
RanjanRanjan,
As a SAP customer we use invoice entry in ERP using MIRO and FB60 as these are the most efficient for our busines.
1. Invoice entry using MIRO tcode is faster as it can be done with minimal use of the mouse. Invoice entry is slower in SRM as browser response and interactions with the backed ERP system slows the systems reponse to the user input. Repeated use of a mouse in the SRM browser is detrimental to fast input.
2. Not all types of invoices can be handled in SRM e.g. Invoice without PO.
3. We process approx 20,000 invoices per month with multiple input operators, SRM could not handle that sort of load.
4. SRM is really a procurement application and although invoice entry is included it is probably more for users who wish to use SRM in a stand alone scenario. We use extended classic so all our financial transactions take place in the ERP backend.
Your choice also depends upon the number and quality of the invoices you plan to process, and the need for the operators to be trained on one or two systems.
Hope these personal observations assist with your decision
Regards
Allen
Maybe you are looking for
-
Interaction of BW Roles and BWA Explorer Security
We secure all our BW users via roles these roles have Analysis authorizations embedded in them which restrict access to specific infoproviders and values in these based on authorization relevant infobjects. When we try to create a BWA Explorer object
-
Ipad not working after installing new ios 7.1
The battery is already full. It happened suddenly and started showing low battery sign and sign to charge the ipad. Nothing happening with pressing buttons or even putting on for charging for quite some time.
-
Hi Experts: I am looking for a complete list of BADI that are related to SRM, such as the CHECK BADI.. etc BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI I checked the Service Market Place, I need a concise list and description Regards Small
-
Error when gathering a distribution
We are currently running ZFS 3.0.2 and are having an error when trying to distribute a large package with many (over 3000) files. The error is: Gather (name and path of application) stopped with an unknown error. The TED.log file has the same informa
-
I keep trying to change my Apple ID password but I can't get past the security questions. Is there another way to get thru because I don't remember my exact answer from 8 years ago.