SRM 7 - CT_PROC_TY attribute invisible

Hi experts,
We are using SRM7.01 and when we were defining user attributes in ppoma_bbp we notice that attribute CT_PROC_TY is not available.
In table T77OMATTR we have this attribute set as invisible.
Is this normal or are we missing some configuration?
We want to use central contract management so I'm assuming that this attribute is required...
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards,
Andreia

Hi,
Go to SM30 and open the table T77OMATTR. In Attributes/scenarios section make the attribute 'Visible' ( untick the check box )
thanks,
sankar.

Similar Messages

Attribute invisible in DMS

Hello all,
I am facing one problem in DMS. I have created one new document type. For that class is created and added all required characteristics in cl02. Now when I am trying to create DIR through cv01n on testing purpose, some characteristics are not visible in the Additional tab.
Kindly give suggestion for this. Points will be awarded.
Punam

Hi Punam,
Hope you have done the following steps for classification :
I have followed the same and it is working fine.
1) In Transaction code CL02, enter class type 017 (for document mgmt) and in characteristic tab make entry as per your requirement, save it.
2) Create DIR Click Classification Tab Call for created class and enter, then select the values in charecteristic to be viewed.
If still atibutes are invissble in characteristic go to Transaction code CT04 and find entries are as per your requirement or not?
Hope it will help you. If still you are not getting the result, tell me the step which you are following so that I can cross check and tell you.
Regards,
Seema S.P.

SLOC not transferred to lines items from Default Settings (SRM 3.0)

When creating a shopping cart via bbpsc01, an SLOC is selected via F4 help (reads from R/3 backend). The SLOC is not populated down to the line items in the Shopping Cart.
This functioned prior to application of BBPCRM support stack 8.
Response from SAP is that we must maintain these SLOCs and their appropriate matching nomenclature in SRM under Extended Attributes via entry and then a report. Unfortunately, we have over 290K of them, and users can add on the fly in SAP backend, so this is not feasible.
Any help is appreciated and will be rewarded!
Bill

Thanks so much for your prompt post!
The report they provided was merely for updating the description, once you have maually added the SLOCs in ppoma_bbp via Extended Attributes> Storage Locations (report BBP_ATTR_TEXT_REFRESH).
What report would allow me to download locally all Storage Locations? If I schedule this to run from time to time, does it just pick up the new slocs?
I am fine with applying all SLOCs to my root structure, but do not know how to apply in ppoma_bbp other than manual entry.
Thanks again for the prompt response!

Need SRM Standard Tables

Hi Gurus
Kindly provide me standard tables commonly used in SRM.
Thanks,
Ranjan

Hi Ranjan,
Check these links for tables used in SRM-
List Of Tables for Purchase order in SRM
SRM Tables for Attributes
Regards,
Sujit

Set htmlb_button to invisible

Can I make a htmlb:button invisible?
The attribute "invisible" in depreciated. Are there any other ways? Thanks...

Well in this case Dany you just need to do what Max recommends OR
<%@page language="abap"%>
<%@extension name="htmlb" prefix="htmlb"%>
<htmlb:content design="design2003">
<htmlb:page title = " ">
    <htmlb:form id="frm">
      <htmlb:textView     text          = "Hello World!"
                          design        = "EMPHASIZED" />
<a href="javascript:frm.submit()">Click me</a>
    </htmlb:form>
</htmlb:page>
</htmlb:content>
Where you place your JavaScript that actually just submit's the form. Now if you are not submitting a form and just clicking the button then Max has the way to go.

Invoice not blocked from posting even if final inv indicator is checked in

Hi,
We have set "No Futher Invoice" Indicator on SRM PO so that no Invoice is posted in ECC, but still able to post an invoice. We didn't find any fields on SRM PO to block the PO Line Items, and we don't want to delete the PO line item because of reporting issues.
Have any of you faced the same Issue? How can we resolve this issue on blocking PO Line Item or Block complete PO so that NO INVOICE can be posted.
Your help is really appreciated.
Thanks
Vijay

How about creating an invoice block in SRM config - SPRO > Supplier Relationship Management > SRM Server > Cross-Application Basic Settings > Set Tolerance Checks. Need to assign the tolerance group against users/org units in the SRM org structure (attribute = TOG - tolerance group) for the tolerance checks to take effect.
Neil

Dymanic Columns in Table Control

Hallo Experts,
I need to create dymanic columns in a Table Control. The column has to by dymanically created based upon a flag entry in one master table.
We have a master table with some rows with a flag entry as shown below,
TEXT                 FLAG
AAAA                  X
BBB                  X
CCC
DDD                 X
I have to show the above entries which are set (AAAA, BBB and DDD) as a columns in the table control.
My Table Control, already have many columns and on the top of that i have to populate this rows as a columns dymamically..
The sample table control structure should looks like the below,
PERNR   NAME   LAND1 AAAA   BBB    DDD
How to acheive this?

Hi
U need to change the attribute of the colunms of the table control, your table control is defined like the type TABLEVIEW:
CONTROLS <table contrl> TYPE TABLEVIEW USING SCREEN <screen number>.
The type TABLEVIEW is based on the type CXTAB_CONTROL, here there's the field COLS (like the type CXTAB_COLUMN) where the attribute of the columns are stored: u need to change the attribute of COLS.
COLS is an internal table, so u need to define a workarea based on CXTAB_COLUMN and set the attribute INVISIBLE in order to hide a certain colunm.
TYPE-POOLS: CXTAB_COLUMN.
DATA: WA_COL TYPE CXTAB_COLUMN.
LOOP AT <table control>-COLS INTO WA_COL.
   IF WA_COL-SCREEN-NAME = ...........
     WA_COL-INVISIBLE = 'X'.
     MODIFY <table control>-COLS FROM WA_COL.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Now u need to insert the right condition in order to show or hide a certain column
Max

Create PO from SC: error in transactin type

Hi all,
I'm on SRM 5.0 with Extended classic scenario.
In particular the scenario is the follow:
create purchase requisition on R3 and replicate it as SC in SRM
create PO on SRM from SC and replicate it on R3
create good movements in R3.
The question is: when a SC is created on SRM, it is created with a values as backend doc type.
This value is takken from the OU (of the SC) for example ZB10.
But if i want to create a PO of type ZB11 from this SC, the system gives me an error: The SC has got another transaction type".
Type transaction type given to SC is taken from the BSA attribute of OU.
It's standard behaviour that I can create a PO from a SC only for a determinate transaction type?
rgs
enzo

Hi Enzo,
first:
The only chance to change the follow document type for PO within extended Scenario within BAdI is to change the BE_DOC_TYPE directly in the inbound BAdiI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI (Method BBP_SC_CHANGE).
Here you can set the desired be_doc_type which will be used for automatic sourcing.
Your problem seems to be an customizing error in your R/3 System:
Check your settings in SPRO (R/3)
--> Material Management --> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Define Document Types
Check Settings for your desired PO doc type
Your PO_DOC_TYPE must be available within the linkage to the doc_type used in your purchase requistion
For example:
I use 2 different PO_DOC_TYPES in SRM
Z1
Z2
Both types are set within OM (SRM) as an attribute (BSA and DP_PROC_TY )
Besides that, both PO_DOC_TYPES (z1 and Z2) are linked to my requistion doc type (z3) in R/3 customizing (mentioned above)
I can create Z1 and Z2 POs out of purchase requisitions with doc type z3 now.
Best regards
Andreas

How to drop the text in to the af:richTextEditor

Hi All
I am using Jdeveloper 11.1.1.4.0.
I ahve a requrment like there is one af:table & af:richTextEditor. I want to drag & drop the table cell informationin af:richTextEditor.
<af:table var="row" value="#{beanDnD.ValueSet}"
id="t1" summary="collection drag source"
rowSelection="single" contentDelivery="immediate"
autoHeightRows="5">
<af:column headerText="Product" id="c3">
<af:outputText value="#{row.product}" id="ot1">
<af:attributeDragSource attribute="value"/>
</af:outputText>
</af:column>
<af:column headerText="Cost" id="c4">
<af:outputText value="#{row.cost}" id="ot2"/>
</af:column>
</af:table>
<af:richTextEditor label="Label 1" id="rte1" valueChangeListener="#{beanDnD.valuechange}"
autoSubmit="true"
binding="#{beanDnD.textBinding}"
value="IceCream">
<af:attributeDropTarget attribute="value"/>
<af:attributeDropTarget attribute="invisible"/>
</af:richTextEditor>
Bean value chnage code
public void valuechange(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {
// Add event code here...
System.out.println(valueChangeEvent.getOldValue());
String s1 = valueChangeEvent.getOldValue().toString();
System.out.println(valueChangeEvent.getNewValue());
String s2 = valueChangeEvent.getNewValue().toString();
textBinding.setValue(s1+s2);
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(textBinding);
but its not working :(
I did same with af:inputText & its working properly.Pz suggest me waht should i do?any help would be appriciated.
Thanks
Charu

Hi Charu,
I know this was a long time ago but do you remember if you ever found a solution for this?
Dave

Trex search not working for not english documents

Hello, I've got a problem enabling full text search for russian documents
For enabling full text search for documents stored in kPro theese steps
were performed:
- creating rfc connection with TREX instance
- enabling Index Release and Classify in transaction skpr06 for document
area SRM
- marking LANGUAGE attribute in table SDOKCLPROP for custom PHIO class
Z780003P01 as obligatory
- creating index category and indexing stored documents in transaction
skpr07 for class Z780003P01
The indexing was performed successfully. Under the created index category
for class Z780003P01 it can be seen two indexed document classes
(transaction spkr07, button indexed documents) one with language marked E
(english) and one marked R (russian).
When trying to perform test search (transaction skpr07) and indicating
language as RU only documents in english can be searched. When trying
a search request in russian search engine allways shows 0 results (for
every request more than 2 characters). Small requests in russian (1-2
characters) show some results but they are hardly to be right.
Have you got some experience enabling full-text search for documents in language other than english?

sorry for long delay, we tried to work with sap support on this problem but still no profit,
>>First go to the document class for which you need to set Russian language , change the language if you have already created a document class for the perticular document type
We tried to add a LANGUAGE attribute as a free attribute in transaction DMWB for our LOIO and PHIO document classes with attribute value 'RU', but still the same issue.
>> Indexing as well as document class also need to change the laguage.
The problem is that the indexing report says that most of documents were marked as indexed in russian successfully, so the problem is somwhere else I think.

How do we bring local product categories inside sourcing...

Hi all,
We are trying to bring the local products, where we can select in the Category ID SPRO...Define Sourcing for product categories. Please let me know how to do...
We are using SRM 4.0 server 5.0 and SP 8
regards,
Bert

Bert,
You can assign only one product hierarchy at a time to purchasing application.
Are you maintaining local & replicated categories into the same product category hierarchy ?
If yes, you should find them in "Defining Sourcing for product categories" (if you select the correct source system = EBP, as I replied before).
If no, you have to choose which one to work with. his one and only this one will be available in SRM procurement flows (attributes, customizing...).
Check customizing point "Assign Hierarchies to Applications".
Rgds
Christophe

SRM attribute: CT_PROC_TY

Hello,
I would like to know if it should be possible to add more than one transaction type in the PPOMA_BBP attribute: CT_PROC_TY ?
Im using SRM 5.0 (HP11) and want to add two trx.types to the Purchasing group in the organization structure but this does not seem to be possible!
Thanks for any reply.
Aart

Hi. As standard this will only accept 1 value.
You can change this in SM30, table T77OMATTR.
Double click attributes, find the one you want to change and tick "Multi-Val".
This will allow you to enter more.
However, you have to think why it is only set to 1 value as standard.
Maybe more than 1 will cause problems?
Regards,
Dave.

Price field is not becoming invisible from the item overview of SRM quote

Hi All,
I am facing a very unique problem . I need make certain fields invisible in the SRM quotation . One of them is the price field at the item level.
I have used BBP_UI_CONTROL_BADI for the same. However the field is NOT becoming invisible from the item overview. It is becoming invisible from the item detail but NOT from the item overview.
Is it because the field is defined as display only in the code ?
I have implemented note 1062639. Other than this price field I am able to make all other fields invisible from the item overview.
Code :
IF iv_fieldname eq 'BBPS_BID_UI_ITEM-PRICE'.
cv_invisible = 'X'.
ENDIF.
IF iv_fieldname eq 'BBPS_BID_UI_ITEM-PRICE_UNIT'.
cv_invisible = 'X'.
ENDIF.
Does anyone have any suggestion as to how to solve the problem ?
Regards,
Ajali Sen

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Make the Dynamic button to be invisible in srm

Hi Guys,
Am working in the current requirement where i need to delete the dynamic buttons in the shopping cart screen in SRM 7,i have mentioned the button names below ...Please help me out.
Buttons;
1)System info
2)Export
3)Memory snapshot
Thanks,
Vignesh.

Hi Vignesh ,
go to tcode 80 in webdynpro /component : FPM_OIF_COMPONENT expand thei webdynpro component go to component configuration folder -->go this configuration : /SAPSRM/WDCC_FPM_OIF_PO_PURCH
click on the start configurator
on screen will open in browser
in this screen
click on other function button
click on this and create the enhancement , after creating enhancement then click on change button
in the screen you can find the export button click onit
here you cab set the visibility as invisible .
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

Issue with employe attributes in SRM

Hello All,
In ECC HR Organization structure, multiple employees are assigned to
single position. The organization structure along with employee data is
replicated from ECC to SRM as it is with the help of ALE Standard
interface and PFAL execution.
Issue: Since attributes are assigned at employee position level in SRM
unlike at employee level in ECC HR. If attributes such as company code,
currency, cost center delivery address are different for each employee
in ECC HR and the how can these be assigned to a single position in SRM
org structure as a default attribute for each employee?
SRM Version 7.13 SP02.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks & Regards,
Phanidhar Maddi

Hi Konstantin Anikeev ,
Thanks. We could see that ECC organization structure is replicated as it is to SRM System ( multiple employees assigned to single position) and employees are able to create SC with out any issue. The default attributes are assigned at employee position level.
The challenge is : In case multiple employees assigned to single position are maintained with different values such as company code and delivery address in ECC and which are replicated to SRM system, how to set default values for each employees?
Regards
Phani

SRM 7 - CT_PROC_TY attribute invisible

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for