SRM catalog setting to make items level field vissible.

Hi
I am dealing with SRM catalog activitities . I want to know the setting by which we make the field visible on portal at item level.
rgds
amarendra

Hello amarendra,
which field are you talking about ?
The one to access to catalog?
If yes, you have to maintain Web Service value for CAT attribute.
Regards.
Laurent.

Similar Messages

Make Item level field Non-Editable in VA01

Dear Experts,
        I have a requirment to make ITEM Category field in item level of VA01
        make Non-editable based on the value of Sale order Type in the main screen
i am using Program MV45AFZZ to make necessary changes i am able change any thing on the header level but i am not geting the control of item level Please suggest me how to change or make fields non-editable in Item level.

Hi,
Try writing code in FORM userexit_field_modification.
*** Lock field pricing date in SO if delivery occured
IF   screen-name = 'VBAP-PSTYV' AND
       sy-tcode NE 'VA01' AND l VBAK-AUART EQ 'your document type'.
      screen-input = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    "USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
KR Jaideep,

Display of Item Level Fields in Complaint Search Result

Hi,
We have enhanced the complaint search result screen to display columns such as item category or code group. These values come from the item level, so the result list displays blanks under these columns. Is it possible to populate these fields? Something like, displaying multiple rows for the same complaint, with different values for item level fields in each row?
For example, there is a complaint with 3 items. The user searches for complaints based on some header field, and this complaint is in the result list. Is it possible to display 3 different rows for the same complaint, with the value for Item Category being different for the 3 rows?

Hi,
Yes, this is possible but it a custom development.
We had similar requirement where we needed to search all searvice orders and complaints belonging to an item category.
We created a Z-search component for this and implemented the logic .
If the complaint search component has item category as a search parameter ( i am not sure) then it will be simple...but it is doesnt have it, then u can include it programatically or using AET ( if you are on 7.0) .
The result population will be programatic as you will have to search complaints matching to your item category.
There are large no of item categories per transaction type, so dynamic search takes too much time and times out on web ui..You must supply atleas one valid item category as the basis for your search.
Thanks & regards,
Suchita

SRM 7.0 item level field in PO screen

Hi all,
We have a requirement to add a field for "Shipping instructions" in SRM just like it appears in ECC PO at the item level.
I currently dont have access to SRM 7.0 system.
Can someone confirm if there is a std field for "Shipping instrucions" in SRM 7.0 just like in ECC?
If not,has anyone implemented a custom solution for such a field.If so,how?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Its possible to add new texts through customizing - standard SRM provides by default some notes like Internal note, Vendor note etc.
We could create our own text, assign these texts to text schema and then assign text schema to transaction type (SHC for shopping cart). This can be done through customizing and then this new text type will comeup for item.
Regards,
Prasanna

Adding item level field to field catalog for a PPF for Outbound Delivery

Hi,
We wish to send a method call to an external system at the time of PGI of the Outbound Delivery Order for the combination of Product/Ship To combination.
Since Product is at item level and not in the standard field catalog, I added it to the field catalog in config, defined a new condition table, access sequence, condition type and maintained it in the right Procedure/Maintenance Group (Outbound Delivery).
Then I defined a new Action Definition, with a new method to send the details to the external system, but am confused on what Schedule Condition I should assign to this Action Definition. If I use standard Outbound Delivery Printing Schedule Condition /SCWM/FDO_PRINT, the PPF only triggers when I use the standard condition type 0DDN with the standard Access Sequence (no Product available). However if I use the new condition type (with product) with the same Schedule condition: /SCWM/FDO_PRINT, the PPF does not get triggered. The log in SLG1 simply says Condition is not fulfilled.
Can you please suggest
Do I need to work with my developer on building a new schedule condition which would look at the new condition technique I have condition records for? Or is there a non ABAP way of making this work?
Lastly, if my ODO has 5 items with only 2 products which have condition record, I want the PPF to be triggered 2 times for that Outbound Delivery.

Hi Experts,
Any update on the above request?

Search help for Custom Item level field

Hi All,
I have two custom fields at Item level. Both of them has fixed values defined at domain. The fixed values have a short text also given with them.
The problem I am facing is when SRM provides default search help for these custom fields, for first field the 'Value' and 'Description' comes in the search result screen, but for second, only 'Value' comes in the search result.
When I try to debug, it shows the SHLPTYPE as 'SH' for first one and for the second as 'FV'.
What does this indicate?
My requirement is to display both value and description in the search result screen.
Please suggest.
Thanks
Nandalal

Hi
Sorry for the delay. My User got locked for some time.
I have seen the document you sent me on my email id.
 I noticed in the case where the Search help is working fine, there is no space in between the contents of the Fixed values and their short text under the value range tab of the Domain element.
But in the case, where there is a problem with the search help. There both the Fixed values and their short description is having a space in between the words.
Try maintaining COND_A instead of "COND A". Also with the short description use "COND_A" instead of "COND A".
I hope this will resolve the issue.
Update me once you have any issues.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Screen BADI for MIRO/FB60 item level field addition

Hi,
I need to add 'Material Group" (MATKL) field in item level similar GL Account. Material group will appear like GL account column in FB60/ MIRO screen ( GL posting).
I want to do without modification with help screen BADI.
Anyone, can suggest which BADI's method / User Exit can allow to add 'MATKL' field screen?
regards,
Rahul Mandale

Dear Rahul,
Please check IMG path :
Material management>Logistic Invoice verification>incoming invoice-->Maintain item list variant.
Or use Tcode SHD0, enter transaction Code MIRO and create a screen variant.
You can create your own screen variant , Untick the invisible check box for material group.
Regards,
w1n

SRM 7.0 SP05 - BRF Item level approval does not work

Hi Experts,
I am working on process controlled workflow for shopping cart approval process. I have defined necessary process levels and workflow works fine for a single item SC.
I have selected decision type as "Item-based approval for partial document" for each process level and hence expect each line item (according the start condition) should have it's own set off approvers, but instead of this, system determines approvers at header level and hence item which does not really need approval undergoes approval as well.
Could you please help me to resolve the issue?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Amit

Hi Bharat,
Yes, we are using the copy of the standard implementation. We are looking into the BADI implementation and trying to assign a separate AREA GUID to each line item. Hopefully, when different aggents are assigned to these AREA GUIDs, it will enable the item level approval. I will keep you updated.
Meanwhile, it would be really helpful if you could share some sample code of such badi implementation which can help me to understand it more clearly.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit

Change item level field (in table VEDA) in Contract (VA41)

Hi freinds,
I am creating a Contract (VA41) & I want to change the value of "Contract validity period" (VEDA-VLAUFZ) in item level.
Anyone know any exit to do that ?
I have tried user exits in MV45AFZZ, but there was no appropriate one where I could change this value.
Enhancement V45W0001 also doesnt work for me.
Thanks & Regards,
Alin

Hi Liju
Have you tried using MV45AFZZ: userexit_move_field_to_vbak or userexit_move_field_to_vbap. I guess here both VEDA and XVEDA are available.
I couldnt try myself as contract data doesnt get populated in our system.
Kind Regards
Eswar

Disable custom field in SRM SUS in PO / POR item level

HI all,
We are using SRM 5.0, ECC6.0 and ECS scenario.
We have a requirement where a custom field in SUS portal has to be disabled for a certain condition.
I have checked for BADIs which could help me achieve this but none are available.
BADIs such as CUF BADI are not getting called while navigating through SUS PO and POR.
Please let us know if there are other ways through which we can achieve this.
Regards
Kishan

Hi,
I use SRM 7.0 i don't know if in 5.0 is equal, but what i would do in 7.0 is;
Add the custom fields in the view /SAPSRM/V_MDF_IC for itmes or /SAPSRM/V_MDF_HC for header.
In this view you can inform a dynamic class and method for do it.
In this method you have a parameter named CS_METADATA you have the following field for do it;
VISIBLE
ENABLED
REQUIRED
I hope it will be useful

Exit/bAdI for changing the item level field in VA02.

Dear Guruss...
I am facing a problem while trying toi change the account assignment group in VA02. The field is present at the iteem level in the tab BILLING.
When I change the field by choosing one of the values provided in the search help and enter, the value is again reset to its initial value. However if I change the value and SAVE (without pressing enter) then the value is saved.
The technical field name is VBAP-KTGRM, I have checked in the include:MV45AFZZ by putting break-points at all the forms but unfortunately none of them is getting triggered when I press enter.
During the debugging I found tha the values of the structure VBAP are overwritten by those of XVBAP everytime I press enter.
I also checked for the bAdI but can not get any help.
Is there any bAdI or exit that can help me for this????
Thanks in Advance......
Abhi.....

Hi Digvijay
   these are some of the enhancements/badi's which is related to t-code va02. just check it out
Transaction Code -               VA02          Change Sales Order
     Enhancement/ Business Add-in               Description
     Enhancement
     V60F0001               SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
     V46H0001               SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
     V45W0001               SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
     V45S0004               Effectivity type in sales order
     V45S0003               MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
     V45S0001               Update sales document from configuration
     V45P0001               SD customer function for cross-company code sales
     V45L0001               SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
     V45E0002               Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
     V45E0001               Update the purchase order from the sales order
     V45A0004               Copy packing proposal
     V45A0003               Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
     V45A0002               Predefine sold-to party in sales document
     V45A0001               Determine alternative materials for product selection
     SDTRM001               Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
     SDAPO001               Activating Sourcing Subitem Quantity Propagation
      Business Add-in
     BADI_SD_SCH_GETWAGFZ               Scheduling Agreement: Read WAGFZ from S073
     BADI_SD_V46H0001               SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
Regards
Zulfikhar ali
Edited by: Zulfikhar Ali Bhutto.N on Sep 23, 2011 11:15 AM

For PO output conditon, Could add po item level field as field catagory?

Hi experts
Now we need setup reuturn PO, use item return flag .if we create new output type for return po, How could we setup the ouptut condition? In current conditon, there is no return po flag field.
Where we could extend this field ? for such po item field, it could be added or not ?
Thanks
Alice

Hi
Thanks a lot for your help. if we craete new document type for return PO, It will be big works, we have po document type for each Region. one more docuemnt type will make more work and confuse for users .
Like Contract / cost assignment PO, it only give the po item flag.which use same output to print the PO?
Does sap have the same function?
Thanks
ALice

SRM 7 - How to make a custom field dynamically retrieved trigger a refresh?

Hi all,
we're working on a brand new installation of SRM 7.
For contracts and purchase order, we created an enhancement on the webdynpro that manages header document data; in such view, custom fields are obtained dynamically and populate a Transparent container; by code, some tray group visually all the custom fields related to a specific section.
Now, the task is quite general; some of these "dynamically retrieved" fields should refresh, when populated, the view.
That is to say, in our context, that some custom field should automatically trigger the WDDOMODIFYVIEW method (which has been extended via overriding with an enhancement) when a value is inserted.
This would be a simple task if the field is explictly visible in the layout screen, since I could easily associate an event to the field itself.
But, since these custom field are automatically extracted in the WDDOMODIFYVIEW method, we don't know how to manage these field's behavior, e.g. after an input value has been inserted.
Each dynamic custom field is a type ref to cl_wd_uielement; we wonder if we have a way to associate an event (e.g., onEnter) to such an element.
Thanks in advance for any suggestion or help you will give us
EDIT: I guess this could not be the best section for such a kind of question ... I'd gently ask moderators eventually to move the thread to the Webdynpro section, if necessary. Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Matteo Montalto on Oct 7, 2010 6:01 PM

Closed. I opened a thread on this topic in a more convenient section of SDN forums (Specifically, web dynpro abap). Thanks anyway:)

CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN not updating the item level field

Hi All,
My requirement is to update a field called "CSC Code" in line item of sales order. hence for this case i am using "CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN" inside the "ORDER_SAVE" BADI. I am passing the ref guid, ref type, object name ,Logical Key and field name in the CHANGING parametrs CT_INPUT_FIELDS. I am passing the internal table containing the ref guid,ref type, partner fct ,partnerno to the internal table IT_PARTNER.
The FM gets executed without any error and the internal table IT_PARTNER is filled with the new CSC code but on checking in the sales order after saving the field is blank.
I have tried using wait up to 2 seconds. Even then it didn't work.
Can some one help me?
Thanks.

Could you please let me know how was it fixed... I have a similar kind of requirement
Edited by: rakesh chaitanya makkapati on Apr 7, 2010 4:49 PM

Item-level Permissions availabe in list advance setting not working.

Hi,
Recently i had an requirement of maintaining item level permission. My requirement was that whenever an item is created in list, it should be created with uniqure permission. I know how to do it by writing
custom code, but i don't want to do it with any code as client doesn't need any dll etc. After explroring i found that there is an option available in List's advance setting. Following are the steps i followed:-
Go to List settting.
Go to Advance setting.
In advance setting we have "Item-level Permissions" as one of option. This option have two
sub options.
For Read Accesss
select "Read items that were created by the user"
For Create and Edit access select "Create items and edit items that were created by the user"
Save the above settings.
Below is the screen shot for above mentioned setting:
Expected behaviour from above setting are:
Users can create new items
User can view and edit items only those item that are created by them.
But i found there is not change in item level permission. All users can View and
Edit items created by other users. May i am
misunderstanding above setting or there is Bug in sharepoint. Please help me if any body have any idea about it.
Regards,
Deepak
Deepak Kejriwal

Make sure that users have "Contribute" permission to the list, if the users have more permission at site level, then the list permission will be overridden by site permission.
Refer the following article for more info.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-sharepoint-services-help/permission-levels-and-permissions-HA010100149.aspx
--Cheers

SRM catalog setting to make items level field vissible.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for