SRM + CUA Active

Dear Gurus,
How can I maintain the su01 users in EBP when CUA is active,although gone through notes 402592 and 772347,still not clear on how to manage as system throwing error while using users_gen to assign user to EBP org structure.kindly advice.
Thanks and Regards,
Sathya kumar.

Hi
Which SRM and R/3 versions are you using ?
For RFC users in SRM server the RFC user should have SAP_ALL access and also the SAP_BBP_STAL_Administrator role.
We have used Solution Manager(SM) as CUA to generate the User-Ids so that there will be a central creation of users and which will follow to R/3 and SRM and all other systems through Solution managers.
If you are using CUA at your place also apply this notes :->
Note 402592 EBP with CUA config settings
Note 772347 BBPusermaint deactivated for CUA
Related links ->
Re: BBPMAININT and CUA
Re: SUS and Central User Admin
Re: Solution Manager for SRM
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Similar Messages

USERCLONE Idoc without CUA activated

Hello everybody,
I've been asked by the customer to answer to this question: can USERCLONE Idocs be generated on ABAP stack without activating CUA on such stack, or is it mandatory to have CUA up and running?
In any case, could you please point me to a documentation where it is stated?
Thank you very much in advance
Marco Baiocco

When you activate CUA, SAP creates distribution model, partner profiles, CUA activation indicators etc. When you do User management, SAP checks whether CUA is active then it will find out distribution model, partner profiles etc and create IDOCs. If you do all these then IDOCs will be generated automatically. Alternatively, you define your own model by defining partner profiles etc and then use User Management events (create, change etc) to generated IDOC with your own programs.
If you are not activating CUA then i guess second method will be preferable as you are not messing with SAP tables.
I dont have table names but if you check SU01 etc the you will find some FMs which checks for CUA.

Contact Person for Vendor in SRM/CUA

Hello SRM Expert,
We are using Central user administration (CUA and like other system SRM is connected to CUA. I am getting the error 'Central system not accessible' while creating the employee (manage business partner) for business partner (Vendor). When we remove CUA then the error disappear.
Could you please let us know would be our approach for creating employee for vendors (for bidding, auction etc..).
Steps for Reconstruction
1. Login to SRM
2. Click on Manage business partner (BBPMAININT)
3. Look for Employee for Business Partner 'Create' option and create a employee for one of the vendors.
4. You will get the message Central 'System not accessible' .
I know one approach where I can create a SU01 in advance from CUA and then in manage business partner use this user but this is very long approach looking at the number of vendors we have. Is there a simpler way ?
Thanks,

Pradeep
Sorry yes it is not specifically about external users. You should review the note again, particularly scenario 2.
Essentially the note explains that, in a CUA environment, to create a user for an external contact person you need to create the following entry in table "BBP_CUST":
Key = "EBP_CUA_SCENARIO"; Value = "ACTIVE".
If you do not want to user table maintenance you can create the entry via the following IMG menu path:
Supplier Relationship Management > SRM Server > Technical Basic Settings >
Deactivate User Access to Solution Manager.
(Ignore the transaction title this transaction is essenatially maintenance of table "BBP_CUST").
Then you must ensure that the user specified on the RFC Definition for the CUA client has authorisations to create users IN THE CUA CLIENT, (it already has authorisations to create in the SRM client). This lack of authorisation is probably the reason for your error message.
Mike

Transport of ECC/SRM datasources activation

Hello
I want to transport the activation of standard ECC or SRM datasources.
When I use the transportation icon (truck) in the RSA6 screen, the system indicates "action successfully completed" but it doesn't ask for a transport request.
How can I include these activations into a transport request?
thanks
Crystelle

Hey, when you are activating a data source, right then it will/should ask you for a transport request. If its not doing that, talk to your basis. If you want to move a datasource that is already transports, then you may have to change it/de-activate(delete) it and then activate it again. but its tricky job and you cannot do this safely on all datasources (especiall the ones that already has an existing delta queue).
Just in case, talk with a basis or Sr. Consultant about the complete requirement.
In summary, if you want to transport a new datasource, as soon as you activate it, you will get a transport request. If it didn't, Its important that you talk to basis. They have to change some parameters.
If you want to move already transported data source, tell us why? If you are making chages to it, it will then ask for a transport request.
Uday Chamarthy

HR Org Structure into an existing manaully created SRM Org structure

Hi,
SRM 5.0, Classic Scenario
1) SRM Org. structure exists and users are using it for Company Code A.
2) Now I have to replicate the HR data from R/3
3) Can I create a NEW root node and replicate the HR data from R/3 (including Company code A users.....this group of users will be using this NEW structure later) ?
Is it possible ?
-Regrads,
Pranav

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
Try these pointers ->
Re: Not able to generate user users_gen
OSS Note - 402592
Re: SRM + CUA Active
If you are using CUA at your place also apply this notes :->
Note 402592 EBP with CUA config settings
Note 772347 BBPusermaint deactivated for CUA
Related links ->
Re: BBPMAININT and CUA
Re: SUS and Central User Admin
Re: Solution Manager for SRM
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Recommended procedure for SOLMAN_SETUP when CUA is Active

We have upgraded to Ehp1/SP20 in Solution Manager. As recommended, we want to use the guided procedure SOLMAN_SETUP to automatically generate the roles and userids required in the managed systems. DEV/BWD/PID etc. We use CUA and it is active in the managed systems so the Userids, Roles, Profiles etc are not in the managed system nor are they in the CUA parent client.
What is the recommended approach/Best Practice to configure Solution Manager with CUA active?
TIA

HI,
Please refer to the RCA- User Administration Guide.
This is under https://service.sap.com/diagnostics.
The guide contains all the details, including the scenario for CUA, closely follow the guide and make sure everything is in place for authorizations.
Hope this helps.
Feel free to revert for any issues.
Thanks,
Jagan

CUA - Programs adding and deleting User Rolls

Good Day;
We are currently bring CUA up and using a sandbox as a test child system. Once fully deployed, we will have CUA controling all systems (Sandboxes, Dev, Quality), except production.
Issue - We currently have an application that allows for the adding or deleting of Rolls through the portal. When this was testing, the program failed.
We need to be able to test in both the development and quality systems.
Question. Is there a way (config maybe) that a program would be able to add and delete Rolls as well as have CUA active.
Regards

Don,
Thanks and I wish you luck on your adventure to CUA.
I think the documentation you will find will not cover CUA landscape design. It will only cover technical configuration.
I based my design on functionality and some common sense. I'll give you the reasonging for our design due to our project scenario.
Production:
We are using HR position base security and CUA. The master is the ECC 6.0 system. We have about 37,000 user IDs and IT 105s (HR info type for communition which is the user ID).
Do I really want to mix my live users with DEV or QA? The answer is NO.
Our production portal UME points to ECC 6.0 and the iViews will point to other system such as SRM or BI.
QA:
QA CUA will have the same configuration as Production. Why? When you run "Integration Testing" - PROD is similar to QA - there will be no surprises on your testing after you move it to production.
DEV:
This will also be the same setup was QA & PROD. DEV will have less users not 37,000 only a couple of hundred for test users and Project Team Members.
Something to think about. Lets say DEV, QA & PROD are in the same CUA and you have to run major service pack testing. This will impact CUA and users that you need to SCUG back after. Let's say the master CUA goes down, you will affect DEV, QA & PROD administration until that system goes up. Just very messy.
There are lot of ways to design CUA, choose one that will work for your current situation.
Good Luck!
Edited by: John Navarro on Feb 25, 2008 7:52 PM

SRM MDM Catalog - SRM OCI mapping relevant for Contract Catalogs

Hi,
According to the scenario we would like to implement, the contract items are distibuted to a catalog and later on they are recalled within other contracts. In this case to do OCI mapping in SRM (customizing activity?) is still relevant? Is this activity necessary for all catalogs internal or external?
Is this what is enabling to dispaly the catalog within SRM transaction like Process Contracts for all type of catalogs?
Thank you in advance,
Edited by: Gaia K. on Nov 18, 2008 6:16 PM

Hi,
Thanks for your input,
I did unmapping between OCI fields and MDM fields at OCI Mapping and but i have selected unmapped fields at all Views.
Now when i login and checked at my catalog side, i can able to see the data for that fields, which i have unmapped at OCI Mapping.
My question is :
1) Why this fields are getting values , when i Unmapped at OCI mapping Level?
2) If this fields are getting values at catalog irrespective of mapping/unmapping at OCI Mapping level, then what is the actual use of OCI mapping?
3) where exactly adding of Custom fields at OCI side is helpful?
Your solution will be rewarded in points
Thanks
Bharat

Integrate Document Builder to SRM (wihtout using PPS or XI)

Hi all,
I am using SRM 7.0 and I want to use the Document builder with SRM without activation the PPS (Procurement for Public Sector) business scenario and without XI.
I looked at some documentation at the service market place
https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000676863&
and also found the Wiki entry:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/DocBuilder/DocumentBuilder3ContentConfiguration+Guide
But the first seem to imply the use of PPS, and the second one describes the configuration of a stand-alone mode, which means that Document Builder is not integrated to another component.
Can anyone give me any advice on how to integrate the document builder into SRM without using PPS or XI?
Thanks very much.
Regards
Ulrike

Hi,
Thank you, Roman, for creating the helpful instructions on integrating Document Builder with HCM using Web Services (Cross-application synchronized integration - SAP Document Builder - SCN Wiki).
Document Builder can be integrated to any SAP application in a similar fashion to how Roman describes in his link; however, in the case of SRM with Procurement for Public Sector (PPS) there is out-of-the-box configurable integration available that shortcuts this process. Licensed PPS customers can access the PPS integration aide by activating the PPS switch.
Best regards,
Maxine

CUA: Model view not created automatically in Child System

Hi, I try to create a CUA with just a child system thru txn SCUA. The result of generation is good and all green. The part that is not right is I do not see the model view created in txn BD64 of child system, I can see it created in master system. Both RFC of master and child system are working fine. I do not see errors at WE20 & WE21 as well. Under this situation, I can see CUA active in master system but not child system. Hence, CUA is not working as it says in master system.
I have setup CUA couple of times before but this is the first time that I encounter such a weird situation. Does anyone has any clue where could have gone wrong?
Edited by: Annie Chan on Jul 25, 2008 5:23 PM

Hi Everyone,
It is indeed a RFC issue but it was a silly mistake with the incorrect hostname that I am suppose to connect to. Hence, the Distribution Model doesn't exist in the child system. Nervertheless, your advise does point to the right direction.
Thanks so much for your input. Points are granted as accordingly.
Regards,
Annie

GRC 10 + CUA + GRC 5.3 on one server?

Hi Experts,
currently we have a Netweaver system running GRC10 and we have also CUA activated.
We want to migrate one older GRC 5.3 system on the same server.
In the note 1590030 it is being said that as of SP04 you can theoretically have a GRC5.3 and a GRC10 running in parallel. But only on the backend systems side. What if you have GRC 5.3 and GRC10 running on the same server where CUA is configured ? Is this possible?
does anyone ever tried this?
thanks in advance
david

Hi Faisal
eventually we will migrate the GRC 5.3 to GRC10, but for the moment we need both systems to run in parallel on one server. In the moment they run on different servers.
Thanks,david

How to deactivation temporary CUA?

Hi,
   I need to deactivate CUA. How I can do it?
I think that across Stcode SCUA, in the Distrubition Model menu there is an option disabled 'Temporary Deactivation' and 'Reactivate CUA' to do it but how to enabled these options??
My issue is that I have to delete the master user in a child system and then, I distribute the users from CUA. Now, with CUA active i don't delete users locally.
Step by step in detail:
1. Has a system or refresh copy from system 1 to system 2.
2. Now the users in system 2 are wrong.
3. In CUA the users from system 2 are correct because I don't transfer the 'new users' from system 1.
4. I want to deactivate CUA for delete locally users i system2.
5. I want to distrubute from CUA the right users to system 2.
Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance, laia.

Hi Surendra,
    First of all, a lot of thanks for your quick answer.
In our Solution Manager, Cua central system, this transaction that you indicate me doesn't exist!!!
There are another way to run that same thing?
Info about my system:
SAP_BASIS     700     0016     SAPKB70016
SAP_ABA                     700                     0016     SAPKA70016
ST-PI                 2005_1_700     0006     SAPKITLQI6
PI_BASIS                 2006_1_700     0006     SAPKIPYM06
SAP_BW                     700     0018         SAPKW70018
SAP_AP                     700     0012     SAPKNA7012
BBPCRM                     500     0012     SAPKU50012
DMIS                 2006_1_700     0010     SAPK-61710INDMIS
ST                     400     0017     SAPKITL427
BI_CONT                     703     0008     SAPKIBIIP8
CPRXRPM                     400     0013     SAPK-40013INCPRXRPM
DMIS_CNT            2006_1_700     0010     SAPK-61710INDMISCNT
ST-A/PI                   01J_CRM500     0000          -
ST-ICO                 150_700     0014     SAPK-1507EINSTPL
ST-SER                700_2008_1     0002     SAPKITLOO2
Regards, Laia.

Settings for BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER

Hi!
I have created a couple of PR in R/3 but when using program BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER I get the message that no PRs are transferred. Have I missed a setting?
Sincerely
Anders Öhrling

Hi
Re: Contact Person for Vendor in SRM/CUA
in the above thread see MIke final words..
ie.
Essentially the note explains that, in a CUA environment, to create a user for an external contact person you need to create the following entry in table "BBP_CUST":
Key = "EBP_CUA_SCENARIO"; Value = "ACTIVE".
If you do not want to user table maintenance you can create the entry via the following IMG menu path:
Supplier Relationship Management > SRM Server > Technical Basic Settings >
Deactivate User Access to Solution Manager.
(Ignore the transaction title this transaction is essenatially maintenance of table "BBP_CUST").
Then you must ensure that the user specified on the RFC Definition for the CUA client has authorisations to create users IN THE CUA CLIENT, (it already has authorisations to create in the SRM client). This lack of authorisation is probably the reason for your error message.
Are you following this?
regards
Muthu

Problem with services hierarchy and purchase order

Hi I'm in Srm 7 EHP8(classic scenario) and i have a problem with services hierarchies:
I create a Purchase requisition in ECC with the next structure:
1.Hier
1.1 Serv1
1.2 Serv2
1.3 Serv3
Then I upload this PR to SRM(I activated the BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI to change to the Extended-classic scenario to upload correctly the hierarchy)
and in the SOCO I only choose the position 1.1 Serv1 and create a purchase order.
The problem is the purchase order created in ECC contain all the services of the purchase requisition, not only the service I choose(1.1 Serv1) to create the purchase order, in SRM the purchase order is correct with only one position(1.1 Serv1)
Any Idea?.
Thanks for the help.

Hi,
I have the same problem, any new about that?
Rgs,
Pedro

Product category mandatory in the shopping cart ?

Hi everybody,
We are studying shopping carts functionalities in SRM in activating ECS.
We are not using articles, but only product categories. We would like to know if the product category is necessary mandatory in the shopping cart? Indeed, if the shopping cart is related to a simple customer need, the information of the product category is not always known by the requester. He would fill only the description of the request.
Thank you for your help,
Vin

Vinna,
Product category (Material Grops) is mandatory for any shopping cart creation, However in SRM some of the basic configuration setting is based on product category only. Mainly the G/L account is mapped with product categories which is important for account validation in the shopping cart.
Kind Regards,
NMK

SRM + CUA Active

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for