SRM Invoice posting issue

Hi Experts,
We are working on SRM 5.0 . Few days back new support pack 'SAPKIBKT14' was implemented.
After this we are trying to post the invoice based on PO in SRM. we entered the PO number and clicked on 'Insert',
then it should display the item details as well as 'Invoicing party' & 'Vendor' details. But here in my case
'Invoicing party' & 'Vendor' details are not displaying, only items details are displaying.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Chandu

Hi,
The invoice is created in SRM but it doesn't replicate, Have you checked the inbound IDOC in your backend (Tx we05)
In the status segment you should see the error.
I hope this help
Best regards

Similar Messages

  • Baseline date not getting populated from SRM invoices posted to ECC 6.0

    Hi,
    We are currently in ECC 6.0. The SRM system is in 4.0. We have this particular problem that the baseline date is not getting populated from the Invoices posted from the SRM. The baseline date is blank and the document is saved.
    Did anyone face the same problem??? Can you please refer SAP note 541934 and expand........
    Thanks
    Aravind
    Edited by: Aitipamula Aravind on Aug 10, 2009 5:13 AM

    Hello,
    Yes, you could check the attached note 541934 and regard the implementation of the field ZFBDT in the invoicing document.
    Note 541934 provides a solution how to achieve the MM-customizing for payment baseline dates getting effective for invoices with SRM-origin. This note needs to be applied at your ERP-MM-side in the former plug-in-layer. As described in the note, this is a modification. It's recommended to apply in non-productive system first.
    Hope the above infor.are helps for you!
    Best Regards,
    Gladys xing

  • SRM Invoice posting without PO reference - Contract Management

    Dear experts,
    We are on SRM 701 with ECC 6.0, in ECS.
    Our requirement is to allow invoice posting in SRM, without PO reference. The invoice will only refer to an existing SRM central contract.
    We did all the relevant customizing and we were able to:
    Replicate SRM central contract to ERP, through PI;
    Invoice creation in SRM and posting in the backend (FI), through IDOCs.
    As far as I understood in this scenario, the invoice posting is made only through FI (not using MIRO).
    My expectation was to have the contract number in some field at the invoice document level, in the FI.  However there is absolutely no reference to the contract in the invoice document. Does anyone know if this is a standard behavior and/or any idea of how to achieve my requirement to have the contract number in the invoice posting?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Andreia

    Hi guys,
    Any thoughts on this?
    Thanks!
    Andreia

  • SRM 7.0 Invoice posting issues, validation

    Hi  Experts ,
    We are configuring SRM7.0 with ECC6 ( Ehp4) having Classic Scenario .
    1. In Std SRM , we can post Invoice both ways
       With ref to PO
       W/o ref to PO.
    We don't want to post Invoice w/o refernce to PO. How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error).
    2. We had NOT actiacted "Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Account" in ECC Invoice Config. But in SRM, If we post any invoice w.r.t. PO and add some extra line item, than system do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000112 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its ststus shows "Waiting from preceeding document".
    How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error)?
    3. We are using GR based IV in PO.
    If for any PO , GR is not done
    User tried to post the invoice in SRM, system gives error message that "Precessing document  req for invoice is not availble", but if I POST it , system proceeds it with green color message "Invoice 80000000113 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "Waiting from preceeding document"
    If PO Qty = 100, GR= 20, IR =100 Qty
    System 1st give error Message
    Line 1 : Qty too high ( Tol  Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
    Line 1 : Value too high ( Tol  Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
    And after that if user POST it, then system just do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000057 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "To be Corrected Manually". How this can be stopped ?
    I believe , by using DOC check or ITEM Check BADi this can be done , Can anyone suggest there is another way ?
    Thanks
    NAP

    Thanks Ranjan,
    1. No there is no any Portal Link for Invoice w/o PO. In the Portal for SRM BP, same single link displays from which we can post both Invoice w.ref to PO and w/o PO.
    2. Since we do not want user to make mistake. System should stop him and do not allow if PO is not refered or IR Qty > GR Qty.
    Do anyone have any inputs.
    Thanks
    NAP

  • Invoice posting issue

    hi
    I have created one PO and two different (two times) GRN done for same po however at the time tof inoice posting (MIRO) with refeence to first  DC, system has display full qty of grn (sum of two different dc qty).
    can you help the same issue.
    reg
    mrs

    hI,
    You would have posted the grn for the PO with the GR Based invoicxe verification check in the PO.If the PO is checked with the box GR based invoice verification in the invoice tab, then system will show you the partial GRs happed with DC in the MIRO screen when referenced.
    Refgards,

  • Limit Order Shopping Cart Invoice posting issue

    Hello Experts,
    I am not able to post invoice for LIMIT ORDER SC(I am using Extended classic scenario); using MIRO when i enter PO no. in the specified field ; in the line item both the amount & quantity appears as zero. and it does not allow to change or edit. Ideally it should allow the posting of invoice but with block payment.
    The same thing i tried for "Describe requirement SC" and it allowed me for posting invoice even without GR/Confirmation.

    Hi,
    You can enter the Invoice, remove the GR/IR based invoice indicator from the invoice tab of the PO line item.
    thanks
    Padhi

  • SRM Invoice management: Triggering issue : exception u201C105: suspected duplic

    Dear all,
    We note that IDs fall exception 105 "suspected duplicates" when no other existing ID in the system admits the same characteristics as these.
    1/ T code: /N/OPT/VIM_1CX5
    2/ This group detects a duplicate if Ids were the same:
    -     Date
    -     Company
    -     Amount
    -     Vendor
    -     Invoice reference
    > we care to control that in the type of document posted on the ID, this exception (105 suspected duplicates) is provided
    3/ T code: /N/OPT/VIM_1CX1
    For example, if the type do document is u201C2 Invoices ordering goodsu201D, we note that this exception is well planned
    *so this bug is random.*
    Could you help us to solve it?
    regards,
    Julien

    Hi Julien,
    First of all you are in the wrong forum here. You are talking about SRM Invoice Management in your subject, but you are describing SAP Invoice Management (an add-on by Open Text).
    When the exception for suspected duplicate arisdes it triggers a workitem in someone's inbox. When opening the workitem it shows the invoices for which this could be a duplicate in a list at the bottom of the screen. This should give some insight.
    You describe exception 105 which is for PO related invoices, and normally in the check the PO number is also included but not according to the fields you mention.
    Furthermore your description is not clear at all. Why do you say the bug (up to now I don't see a bug in what you describe) is random?
    Regards,
    Martin

  • Invoice posting  is not triggering idoc message in EBP to FI backned ECC6

    Hi ,
    We are working on classic scenario with SRM 5 having EBP and SUS on separate clients on same srm system.
    Now we are extending standlone scenario for selected product categories .
    We have created product master ,product category & vendor master in SRM EBP client. Defined below settings
    1.Define Sourcing for Product Categories -local
    2.Define Objects in Backend System  -EBP of type Local
    3.Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignmet
    We are able to create Shpping cart ->purchase order( local)->confirm goods & invoice for local product
    With  central ccountant authorization employee user has created the invoice  and resulted status of invoice as
    "Currently Being Transferred" , expected   to post the invoice in ECC system but after invoice idoc is not getting generated in SRM in order to  transferred to backend  ?
    I have tried and in debug mode found that ,Logical System of Logistics Backend is wrongly
    attached to invoice ie instead of ECC logical system it is appearing SRM Local logical system . After changing the
    backend value  for invoice header -BE_LOG_SYSTEM from srm to ecc backend & executed
    FM-BBP_PROCDOC_TRANSFER  for particular invoice ,Idoc Basic type        BBPIV01 is generated and passed to ecc.
    But not able to identify why wrong "Logistic backend " is appeared in invoice. we have below attributes maintained in
    Employee
    Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     DSRCLNT254(SRM local)
    Company Code                                         BUK     100
    Cost Center                                                               CNT     430900
    System Alias                                                         SYS     LOGSYS250
    System Alias for Accounting Systems                   ACS     DSRCLNT254
    System Alias for Vendor                                      VENDOR_SYS     LOGSYS250
    Vendor
    Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     LOGSYS250(ECC)
    Company Code                           BUK                            100
    System Alias for Vendor                      VENDOR_SYS                            LOGSYS250(ECC)
    Kindly help me to post the invoice to ECC backend ,

    Thanks Sheetal,
    We have classic scenario in place so ECC system (LOGSYS250 ) is defined as backend system  of type- ERP_2.0   &
    FIvalid- realtime backend validation .
    We are using  ECC is the accounting system defined  in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
    Note: More to add that Invocie idoc generated after  backend logical system correction in invoice header data  of SRM ,
    it is posting invoice successfully in eCC backend .  So  data correction for logical system value is seems  some problem with standlone scenario configuration . 
    We have validating this scenario for selectd product categories as  with SRM 5 version in place,  customer is intrested to use Invoice management system ie.   invoice should be validated with exceptions  in SRM before posting to ECC.
    We have EBP & SUS in different client on SRM system ,so  in existing  classical scenario   invoices created in SUS  against ECC backned purchase orders is  not flowing to IMS in EBP . Can you help me to validate the scenario ?
    Regards,
    Santosh
    Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 2, 2009 1:51 PM
    Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 5, 2009 11:37 AM
    Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 9, 2009 7:38 AM.
    Issue is resolved  . It is the System Alias for Accounting Systems setting in organization  module .
    Now with completion of workflow  idoc message-BBPIV is generated in SRM and successfully posting in ECC.
    Thanks a lot for your inputs .

  • Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code

    Hi:
    We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     0
    Cess     0
    SECess     0
    Value+Excise     1000
    VAT 5%     50
    ValueExciseVAT     1050
    (Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     100
    Cess     2
    SECess     1
    Value+Excise     1103
    VAT 5%     55.15
    ValueExciseVAT     1158.15
    We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
    24340000     Paper Stock     BSX     1,000.00
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00-
    We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,050.00-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     50.00
    The Material was issued to Cost Centre
    Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
    To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
    24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     1.00
    24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     100.00
    24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     103.00-
    My Question:
    a. Is this the correct way?
    b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,158.15-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI1     100.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     VS9     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI6     1.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     55.15
    Please guide.
    Regards,

    Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
    Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
    The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
    We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
    Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.
    Regards,
    PK

  • Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,tax rate?

    Hi Experts
    tax rate (June)=22%
    tax rate (july)=24%
    issue is Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,so sytem taking tax rate =24% instead of 22%.Because outbound delivery is happened in June.
    Please let me know that,
    1)how system picking tax rate on base like billing date or service render date or ...?
    2)how to take tax rate (june)=22% in July posting.
    regards
    sachin

    Tax Rate is picked based on the pricing date.
    You need to check with your SD collegue to configure the pricing date to be equal to outbound delivery date to pick the outbound delivery date based tax rates.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • F-28 incoming Invoice Posting Discount Splitting

    Hi All,
    I am using BDC for F-28  T Code to post incoming Invoice posting
    but the issue is while posting the discount amount if i send 60 Rs through file it is splitting into 30 and 30
    Not exactly  50-50
    I am unable to get on what basis the amount is splitting.
    I hvae to asssign Cost and Profit Center to the Discount amount .
    But how many parts the Dicount amount is splitting is th issue.
    Pls Help Me.
    regards
    Venu Madhav

    pls. send u r code if possible..
    Thanks,
    Mahesh Kumar.

  • Service PO with Freight/ Insurance Condition- Invoice posting

    Hi,
    I'm using ECC6.0 version. I'm getting one problem in External Services Procurement.
    Issue is:
    1. Created a Service PO. Item Detail level, maintaines 1 text service with 10 Qty @ 50 INR.
    2. In PO item Conditions tab, maintained Insurance condition (which is created by copying Frt. Condition FRB1) with say Rs. 100/-. Actually this should be levied on the overall item level at item overview Qty (i.e. 1 AU).
    3. I made Service Entry, Acceptance.3.
    At the time of Invoice posting, when I choose Goods/Services+ Plannd Del. costs, system proposing 5,000 ( 10 qty x 100 inr), instead of showing 100 inr. i.e. system proposing sub item qty times insurance.
    Is there any setting to control this price?
    Regards,
    Kanth

    Hi Sujit,
    We can't maintain it as Header Condition because for service PO just like other POs, some times we may maintain more than 1 item which covers different Rates.
    Please check my scenario
    Has anybody got similar problem?

  • Problem with invoice posting

    Hi .. i,m facing an issue with intercompany Invoice posting .
    I'm having delivery note as a reference to that invoice but im getting error message that delivery note doesnot exist..
      i have entered correct delivery note..
      how this can b overcome?
      Thanks and regards..
          Manoj

    hi,
    for having del. note as ref in MIRO, first you must have entered the same del. note while making GR (MIGO), then only that is possible.
    Have you done that,
    other wise PO ref is the best & will work anyway
    Regards
    AK

  • Best practice for invoice posting inSRM

    Dear expert,
    what is the best practice for posting an invoice? Is it in SRM system or MM system? In SRM, the system allows one to use approval procedure for invoice posting; wheras in MM, one cannot use the apporval procedure to post an invoice. similar is the case, in SRM-SUS and MM-SUS scenario?
    I would appreciate if you can feedback on the industry practice.
    thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

    Ranjan,
    As a SAP customer we use invoice entry in ERP using MIRO and FB60 as these are the most efficient for our busines.
    1. Invoice entry using MIRO tcode is faster as it can be done with minimal use of the mouse.  Invoice entry is slower in SRM as browser response and interactions with the backed ERP system slows the systems reponse to the user input.  Repeated use of a mouse in the SRM browser is detrimental to fast input.
    2. Not all types of invoices can be handled in SRM e.g. Invoice without PO.
    3. We process approx 20,000 invoices per month with multiple input operators, SRM could not handle that sort of load.
    4. SRM is really a procurement application and although invoice entry is included it is probably more for users who wish to use SRM in a stand alone scenario.  We use extended classic so all our financial transactions take place in the ERP backend.
    Your choice also depends upon the number and quality of the invoices you plan to process, and the need for the operators to be trained on one or two systems.
    Hope these personal observations assist with your decision
    Regards
    Allen

  • Invoice posting - set document date as baseline date

    Hi Expert!
    I have issue regardig invoice posting.
    When invoice posting transactions are done, the baseline date in the transaction is changing due to unknown reasons. The baseline date should not change and should be the document date. This in turn is having effects on the culculation of the due date for the payment terms.
    In this case, i would like to make the document date as the default baseline date and remove the option of changing the baseline date. Please guide me on how to do it step by step.. Please also advise step by step how can i do that in transaction MIRO, FB60, FV60, FB65 and FV65..
    Thanks..

    prashant,
    let say i have 3 company codes but i want to set the document date as the default for baseline date only for 2 company codes, how? If i tick on document date in the path u've given, will it be affected to all of company codes?
    Where can i check for the payment terms against company code? Because payment terms in the path u've given seems like different than what is being using in the PO currently..
    In the path there are 0001, 0002 and 0003 but payment terms which are being using in the PO are K160, K162....
    Please advise..

Maybe you are looking for

  • Satellite M30-154 - no color on TV

    Connected a TV by s-video-to-scart-cable. Image is perfect but in B/W, no color. Tried to find any settings in the display drivers but until now nothing brought the color back in the image. (tv is fine) In the settings there is a possibility to choos

  • "Save for Web" exporting very slowly

    I appologize if this question has been answered somewhere already, I didn't find a solution for my problem, so here goes. When saving images for web, photoshop (or is it still considered image ready?) can take as long as 10-15 seconds per slice while

  • Drop column from compressed table

    NLSRTL 11.2.0.3.0 Production Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition 11.2.0.3.0 64bit Production PL/SQL 11.2.0.3.0 Production TNS for Linux: 11.2.0.3.0 Production Hello, I read about how to drop column from a compressed table - first set it unused and

  • Phone number links in iCal

    Hello all; In Mail, phone numbers turn into links which when tapped dial the call. In iCal, even if I put a phone number in the event name or notes and view it on the iPhone, it is not a link. So I transcribe it on paper (yuck!) then dial it manually

  • DataGrid Sort Clears HeaderRenderer Checkbox

    I have a datagrid that I defined a checkbox as the headerrenderer for one of the columns. It took me a while to track this down, but it seems like a re-sort on one of the columns (other than the checkbox headerrenderer column) clears the state of the