SRM, MDM, ECC integration for central contract management.

Hi there,
I am questioned by a client with respect to the possibility of the following scenario -
1. There are several SAP back end systems in place.
2. SRM 7.0 will be implemented as single sourcing system.
3. The SAP back end systems carry different material master codes for the same material and this will remain the same and no cleaning effort to have a unique code across all systems is going to be done.
4. If we use MDM in the mix - will it be possible for the SRM system to act as a central contracting solution and create a central contract with the unique material code in MDM.
5. On distribution of this contract across to individual SAP back end system the back end should map the MDM code to correct material code in that respective system.
Any insights with respect to if this is possible with some enhancements or not at all possible will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Shantanu Joshi

Hello Shantanu Joshi
Your business scenario is standart MDM functionality
More about how it works you can read from:
MDM overview
and standart help links (see scenarios part):
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/43/D7AED5058201B4E10000000A11466F/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/43/D7AED5058201B4E10000000A11466F/frameset.htm
Regards
Kanstantsin

Similar Messages

  • SRM -- MDM -- ECC integration for central contract management for SRM 7.0

    Hi there,
    I am questioned by a client with respect to the possibility of the following scenario -
    1. There are several SAP back end systems in place.
    2. SRM 7.0 will be implemented as single sourcing system.
    3. The SAP back end systems carry different material master codes for the same material and this will remain the same and no cleaning effort to have a unique code across all systems is going to be done.
    4. If we use MDM in the mix - will it be possible for the SRM system to act as a central contracting solution and create a central contract with the unique material code in MDM.
    5. On distribution of this contract across to individual SAP back end system the back end should map the MDM code to correct material code in that respective system.
    Any insights with respect to if this is possible with some enhancements or not at all possible will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Shantanu Joshi

    Hello Shantanu Joshi
    Your business scenario is standart MDM functionality
    More about how it works you can read from:
    MDM overview
    and standart help links (see scenarios part):
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/43/D7AED5058201B4E10000000A11466F/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/43/D7AED5058201B4E10000000A11466F/frameset.htm
    Regards
    Kanstantsin

  • ERP release for Central Contract Management with SRM 7.0 EhP 1

    Hi all,
    i would like to have clarification with ERP and SRM release combinations regarding SRM 7.0 EhP1.
    Indeed, the "Software Component Matrix for SAP SRM 7.0 EHP1", for Operational Contract Management, tells 'EHP 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 required'.
    Moreover, in RKT dealing with SRM EhP1 delta overview, ERP 6.0 with EhP5 is mandatory for an upgrade to SRM7.01.
    Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation regarding this point.
    We do not want to use PI to execute the Enterprise Services for CCM. So, we intend to switch BF SRM_WSRM_1 on.
    But on the ERP side (EhP5), the only BF dealing with Contract Management is LOG_MM_P2PSE_2 which description is about Service Procurement (and more exactly for item hierarchies).
    Does it mean we can use SRM 7.01 with ERP 6.0 EhP4 and without PI but only if we do not use Central Contracts with service hierarchies ?
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

    Hi Laurent,
    Yes.
    When Central contract was designed in SRM 7.0 with ERP EhP4, it was designed with no service hierarchy. But in SRM 7.01 Central contral was enhanced to handle service hierarchy and it works with ERP EhP5. The problem is when we have SRM 7.01 and ERP EhP4. To handle this complication SRM 7.01 was designed to send flat service lines to EhP4 and lower release even though Central contract in SRM has service hierarchy. So while transfering to ERP EhP4 system in standard, all outlines are not consider for transfer and only service lines (Functional items) are transferred to ERP. To do so user needs to maintain the backend destination information of the connected backend system in table BBP_BACKEND_DEST via SM30 transaction with correct system type (for EhP4 system it will be ERP_4.0 and for EhP5 ERP_5.0). SAP Standard program checks this while XML generation for transfer and if system type is ERP_4.0 system it removes all outlines from temp table before generating the XML data. When it is done, ERP has only service lines in its XML and it does the manupulation to create the replication of central contract.
    Master Guide (Including Upgrade Information) - SAP SRM 7.01 states:
    "The use of SAP NetWeaver PI is optional but it is required for outbound XML-based messaging or for connecting non-SAP planning or execution systems."
    So service hierarchy is possible in SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 but only with PI. For other CCM functionalities, SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 without PI works fine.
    Best regards,
    Christian Zeuch

  • Badis for Central Contract Replication from SRM to ECC

    hi
    experts
    i am working on a scenario of replicating the central contract from SRM 0.7  to ECC via XI/PI
    let me know what are the Badis to be implemented in ECC for the Same
    looking forward for your  reply

    Hi,
    You do not need any Badi in ECC to distribute central contract to your backend system.
    if your ECC system is on ECC 6.0 enpk 4.0 or more,
    you can directly distribute your central contract from SRM to ECC system using standard ESOA services.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

  • SRM 7.0 / ERP 6.04: Config. of Central Contract Management

    Hello,
    I want to configure the newly introduced integrated Procure-to-Pay Scenario Central Contract Management.
    I found SAP Note number 1268821 where all tasks are described in order to implement the previous scenario.
    For correct implementation, business function "Purchasing - SAP SRM Integration" (LOG_MM_P2PSE_1) activation is required in the ERP Systems.
    When I run SFW5 t-code in order to activate the previous business function, SAP system gives an alert message.
    What are the consequences of this business function activation ??
    Thank you
    Michele

    Hi Michele,
    I don't think there will be any consequences, we had certain warning messages aswell when we activated the business functions in ECC 6. Reading the warning messages we could conclude it wasn't any serious problem.
    Details on functionalities included in a business function can be viewed here: [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04_sp/helpdata/en/42/fbded750e61febe10000000a422035/frameset.htm] -> Business Functions (SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0) -> Business Functions in SAP ERP -> Logistics -> Materials Management -> Procurement - SRM Integration
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • Setup Central Contract Management SRM 7.01 with differing release versions

    Hello experts,
    OSS note 1268821 explains how to configure the central contract management between a SRM 7.0 and  an ERP 6.04. So far so good, but how should it be handled if there are differing release versions such as ERP 6.04 and ERP 6.03? I guess that a technical split (xml services/ ALE distribution) is necessary?
    Assuming that there are some backends with differing release versions and in some cases with differing master data (not supported by central master data client) would you always go via PI? Independent of release version, technology and master data.
    Could you give some further detailed informations how to configure such a scenario? What has to be done to transfer existing contracts from an ERP 6.04 into SRM CM component (migration concept)?
    Thanks!!!
    KR Thorsten

    Hi Thorsten
    The minimal ECC version is 6.0 EHP4, Central Contracts require certain business functions in ECC to be activated and as these are included within ECC EHP4 you won't have these available in lower version. Therefore you won't be able to operate central contracts in such an ECC system.
    You would either have to go with patching these systems or go with GOA's for these systems.
    Operating central contracts via PI or SOA i believe provide almost similar functionality. SOA however requires an SRM EHP1 system and ECC EHP5 back-end to operate whilst central contracts configured via PI can be operated onwards from an SRM 7.0 and EHP4 system.
    I can't help you on your migration issue, maybe someone else can.
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • Central Contract Management

    Dear SAP Experts,
    I have a few questions regarding our implementation of SRM and ECC.
    FYI, we are planning to use SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.05 as backend.
    We’re planning to utilize Central Contract Management functionality in SRM, where we negotiate the price in SRM then we distribute the contract to ECC. In ECC we create PR, which have reference to this contract (contract number in SRM is different with ECC). So this PR will have assigned source of supply, is it possible for us then to create PO automatically from tcode ME59? The reason we ask this because we see in documentation that every PO in ECC created with reference to contact in SRM, ECC will need to check first the current price in the SRM contract, so we would like to confirm whether it is working if we use ME59 (we plan to use ME59 as background job and unfortunately we don’t have the testing system yet to verify this).
    We’re planning to have PR created in ECC. However we would like to utilize MDM catalog as well. Is it possible that during PR creation we can select items from the catalog?
    We’re planning to have implement SRM 7.01 in 2 waves. In first wave we will only use Self Service Procurement and Strategic Sourcing (using classic deployment where the leading PO is in ECC). However in the second wave, we’re planning to implement SUS (Supplier Collaboration). In SUS, we would like to activate the business function, so the vendor will response RFx and participate in auction from SUS itself. The question is…is it possible for us to have it planned like this? For example, in first wave, the RFx and auction will use SRM server itself, however in the second wave, we will switch it to SUS. Our concern is that the switch will happen to the productive server already. Is this okay?
    Thanks
    Varian

    Hi,
    When you distribute the central contract to ECC system, it creates a new contract in ECC system.
    When you create PR, you can assign this contract as source of supply.
    Then automatic PO creation if your settings for automatic PO is maintained.
    In ECC 6.04 also catalog integration is possible. So for your version 6.05 there is absolutely no problem. The same OCI interface parameters have to be maintained in MM system for catalog.
    Your two stage implementation is absolutely possible.
    With Regards,
    Malay

  • Central Contract Management in case of Classic Scenario

    Hi,
    At our current implementation, requirement is to implement both Service procurement(with hierarchy) and Central Conract Management. I was exploring the possibility of utilizing Central Contract Management with Classic scenario.
    Will the Central Contracts created in this fashion be available in Sourcing Cockpit for the buyer to select against Purchase Requisitions? Will the Central Contract be visible at all in SRM in this case ?
    Please respond only with reference to Classic scenario.
    Thanks,
    Abhilash

    Yes the Central Contract will be available in the Sourcing Cockpit, both local and classic scenario's. Yes the Central Contracts will be available for the creation of Purchase Requisitions in R/3 and to assign SOS in R/3.
    Do know that for SRM 7.0 PI is required for setting up Central Contracts. This is promised to change with the release of EHP1 for SRM (due june 2010).
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • WSRM setup for Central Contract

    Hi,
    We want to setup SRM 7 Ehp1 system without using PI. For this WSRM setup is required for exchange of documents between SRM and ECC. I am referring to the configuration guides in service market place and OSS note # 1043195. But there are couple of settings which are not clear. Has someone worked on this before and can guide me?
    Thanks,
    SKN
    Edited by: SKN on Jul 29, 2011 2:49 PM
    Is PI independent communication using WSRM available from ECC 6 Ehp5 onwards and not in ECC 6 Ehp4?

    Hi,
    You do not need any Badi in ECC to distribute central contract to your backend system.
    if your ECC system is on ECC 6.0 enpk 4.0 or more,
    you can directly distribute your central contract from SRM to ECC system using standard ESOA services.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

  • SRM Central Contract Management with Service Hierarchy

    Hello Gurus !
    Is it possible to use the export/import functionality (with the business function SRM_CONT_IMPR_2) for changing/adding the service hierarchies in SRM Central Contract?  I see the SAP note that the hierarchies are not supported for Purchase Order.
    Any idea?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi Raj,
    it's not supported for contracts either.
    Regards,
    Zsofi

  • SRM-PI-ECC Integration issue

    Hey All
    There is some issue coming in Central Contact management scenario.
    SRM 7.0
    ECC 6.0 EHP 4
    PI
    *below is the error details we get in SXMB_MONI of SRM Sytem*  <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Call Integration Server
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIProtocol</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="PARSER">ITEM_UNEXPECTED</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1><></SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2><Fault></SAP:P2>
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4>ST: ST_XMS_MSGHDR30_SOAP_FAULT</SAP:P4>
      <SAP:AdditionalText>System expected the element 'Fault'</SAP:AdditionalText>
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Unexpected XML element <>; <Fault> was expected System expected the element 'Fault'</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Thanks
    Narender
    Edited by: Prateek Raj Srivastava on Mar 5, 2011 4:49 PM

    Thanks Buddy.
    We have some progress. Now data passed from SRM to PI  and now stucked in ECC. The XML file in SXMB_MONI in ECC, shows the staus "Transfer to External Application" and in ECC SMQ2  Queue  XBQRCCR4400000066 stucked with status "STOP".
    While dubugging the relevant we are getting the error '"COMMNICUTION_FAILURE"
    And the Payload .xml file is as below :
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Call Inbound Proxy
      -->
    - <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
    - <SOAP:Header>
    - <SAP:Main xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsu="http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" versionMajor="003" versionMinor="000" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" wsu:Id="wsuid-main-92ABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7">
      <SAP:MessageClass>ApplicationMessage</SAP:MessageClass>
      <SAP:ProcessingMode>asynchronous</SAP:ProcessingMode>
      <SAP:MessageId>E04BAF35-8357-83F1-82AD-005056A12FA9</SAP:MessageId>
      <SAP:TimeSent>2011-03-11T07:14:32Z</SAP:TimeSent>
    - <SAP:Sender>
      <SAP:Service>SS1CLNT200</SAP:Service>
      <SAP:Interface namespace="" />
      </SAP:Sender>
    - <SAP:Receiver>
      <SAP:Party agency="" scheme="" />
      <SAP:Service>ES1CLNT200</SAP:Service>
      <SAP:Interface namespace="http://sap.com/xi/APPL/Global2">PurchasingContractSRMReplicationRequest_In</SAP:Interface>
      </SAP:Receiver>
      <SAP:Interface namespace="http://sap.com/xi/APPL/Global2">PurchasingContractSRMReplicationRequest_In</SAP:Interface>
      </SAP:Main>
    - <SAP:ReliableMessaging xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:QualityOfService>ExactlyOnceInOrder</SAP:QualityOfService>
      <SAP:QueueId>CCR4400000066</SAP:QueueId>
      </SAP:ReliableMessaging>
    - <SAP:HopList xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
    - <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2011-03-11T07:14:32Z" wasRead="false">
      <SAP:Engine type="BS">SS1CLNT200</SAP:Engine>
      <SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XI</SAP:Adapter>
      <SAP:MessageId>E04BAF35-8357-83F1-82AD-005056A12FA9</SAP:MessageId>
      <SAP:Info>3.0</SAP:Info>
      </SAP:Hop>
    - <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2011-03-11T07:14:32Z" wasRead="false">
      <SAP:Engine type="IS">is.01.auvimel00s971</SAP:Engine>
      <SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XI</SAP:Adapter>
      <SAP:MessageId>E04BAF35-8357-83F1-82AD-005056A12FA9</SAP:MessageId>
      <SAP:Info>3.0</SAP:Info>
      </SAP:Hop>
    - <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2011-03-11T07:14:33Z" wasRead="false">
      <SAP:Engine type="BS">ES1CLNT200</SAP:Engine>
      <SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XI</SAP:Adapter>
      <SAP:MessageId>E04BAF35-8357-83F1-82AD-005056A12FA9</SAP:MessageId>
      <SAP:Info>3.0</SAP:Info>
      </SAP:Hop>
      </SAP:HopList>
    - <SAP:RunTime xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
      <SAP:Date>20110311</SAP:Date>
      <SAP:Time>181433</SAP:Time>
      <SAP:Host>AUVIMEL00S962</SAP:Host>
      <SAP:SystemId>ES1</SAP:SystemId>
      <SAP:SystemNr>00</SAP:SystemNr>
      <SAP:OS>Windows NT</SAP:OS>
      <SAP:DB>MSSQL</SAP:DB>
      <SAP:Language />
      <SAP:ProcStatus>003</SAP:ProcStatus>
      <SAP:AdapterStatus>007</SAP:AdapterStatus>
      <SAP:User>RFCUSER</SAP:User>
      <SAP:TraceLevel>1</SAP:TraceLevel>
      <SAP:LogSeqNbr>001</SAP:LogSeqNbr>
      <SAP:RetryLogSeqNbr>000</SAP:RetryLogSeqNbr>
      <SAP:PipelineIdInternal>SAP_RECEIVER</SAP:PipelineIdInternal>
      <SAP:PipelineIdExternal>RECEIVER</SAP:PipelineIdExternal>
      <SAP:PipelineElementId>1DC6B93B44BBA66BE10000000A1148F5</SAP:PipelineElementId>
      <SAP:PipelineService>PLSRV_CALL_INBOUND_PROXY</SAP:PipelineService>
      <SAP:QIdInternal>XBQRCCR4400000066</SAP:QIdInternal>
      <SAP:CommitActor>X</SAP:CommitActor>
      <SAP:SplitNumber>0</SAP:SplitNumber>
      <SAP:NumberOfRetries>0</SAP:NumberOfRetries>
      <SAP:NumberOfManualRetries>0</SAP:NumberOfManualRetries>
      <SAP:TypeOfEngine client="200">SND_CENTR</SAP:TypeOfEngine>
      <SAP:PlsrvExceptionCode />
      <SAP:EOReferenceRuntime type="TID">AC1E020C11E44D79CBD9E0A7</SAP:EOReferenceRuntime>
      <SAP:EOReferenceInbound type="TID" />
      <SAP:EOReferenceOutbound type="MSGID">E04BAF35835783F182AD005056A12FA9</SAP:EOReferenceOutbound>
      <SAP:MessageSizePayload>2929</SAP:MessageSizePayload>
      <SAP:MessageSizeTotal>11916</SAP:MessageSizeTotal>
      <SAP:PayloadSizeRequest>2929</SAP:PayloadSizeRequest>
      <SAP:PayloadSizeRequestMap>0</SAP:PayloadSizeRequestMap>
      <SAP:PayloadSizeResponse>258</SAP:PayloadSizeResponse>
      <SAP:PayloadSizeResponseMap>0</SAP:PayloadSizeResponseMap>
      <SAP:Reorganization>INI</SAP:Reorganization>
      <SAP:AdapterInbound>IENGINE</SAP:AdapterInbound>
      <SAP:AdapterOutbound>PROXY</SAP:AdapterOutbound>
      <SAP:InterfaceAction>DEL</SAP:InterfaceAction>
      <SAP:RandomNumber>57</SAP:RandomNumber>
      <SAP:AckStatus>000</SAP:AckStatus>
      <SAP:SkipReceiverDetermination />
      </SAP:RunTime>
    - <SAP:PerformanceHeader xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
    - <SAP:RunTimeItem>
      <SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="AUVIMEL00S962">20110311071433.211</SAP:Timestamp>
      </SAP:RunTimeItem>
    - <SAP:RunTimeItem>
      <SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="AUVIMEL00S962">20110311071433.256</SAP:Timestamp>
      </SAP:RunTimeItem>
    - <SAP:RunTimeItem>
      <SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="AUVIMEL00S962">20110311071433.257</SAP:Timestamp>
      </SAP:RunTimeItem>
    - <SAP:RunTimeItem>
      <SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="AUVIMEL00S962">20110311071433.274</SAP:Timestamp>
      </SAP:RunTimeItem>
    - <SAP:RunTimeItem>
      <SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="AUVIMEL00S962">20110311071433.274</SAP:Timestamp>
      </SAP:RunTimeItem>
    - <SAP:RunTimeItem>
      <SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="AUVIMEL00S962">20110311071433.387</SAP:Timestamp>
      </SAP:RunTimeItem>
    - <SAP:RunTimeItem>
      <SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_CALL_INBOUND_PROXY</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="AUVIMEL00S962">20110311071433.39</SAP:Timestamp>
      </SAP:RunTimeItem>
      </SAP:PerformanceHeader>
    - <SAP:Diagnostic xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:TraceLevel>Information</SAP:TraceLevel>
      <SAP:Logging>Off</SAP:Logging>
      </SAP:Diagnostic>
    - <SAP:System xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:Record namespace="http://www.sap.com/webas/712/soap/features/runtime/metering/" name="CallingType">SA</SAP:Record>
      </SAP:System>
    - <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/XI/engine/?type=entry</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Work Process ID: 4580</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = ES1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 200</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = RFCUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2011-03-11T07:14:33Z AUSVIC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = E04BAF35835783F182AD005056A12FA9</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = RECEIVER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EOIO</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queue-Id = CCR4400000066</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = RECEIVER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_RECEIVER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBQRCCR4400000066</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBQRCCR4400000066</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">--start determination of sender interface action</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">select interface</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">--start determination of receiver interface action</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">select interface PurchasingContractSRMReplicationRequest_In</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://sap.com/xi/APPL/Global2</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">--no interface action for sender or receiver found</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Work Process ID: 2348</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline RECEIVER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = ES1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 200</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = RFCUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2011-03-11T07:14:33Z AUSVIC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline RECEIVER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_RECEIVER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_CALL_INBOUND_PROXY" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="Inbound Framework" />
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Application-Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">ROLLBACK WORK requested by application</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async processing completed OK.</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = ES1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 200</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = RFCUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2011-03-11T07:14:33Z AUSVIC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      </SAP:Trace>
      </SOAP:Header>
    - <SOAP:Body>
    - <SAP:Manifest xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:wsu="http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" wsu:Id="wsuid-manifest-5CABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7">
    - <SAP:Payload xlink:href="cid:payload-E04BAF31EF9CE7F189DE005056A10467sap.com">
      <SAP:Name>MainDocument</SAP:Name>
      <SAP:Description />
      <SAP:Type>Application</SAP:Type>
      </SAP:Payload>
      </SAP:Manifest>
      </SOAP:Body>
      </SOAP:Envelope>
    Can anyone suggest what can be issue ?
    Thanks
    NAP

  • MDM-ECC Integration

    Hi,
    I need a step by step guide displaying MDM-ECC Integartion.
    One way is to use MATMAS IDOC which XI turns into XML and MDM Import Server
    inbound port picks up and send to MDM. Similarly the Syndication Server responds.
    Now, I need to know whether any alternative approach.
    MDM ABAP API is to access MDM through Object Oriented ABAP.
    Regards
    Kaushik Banerjee

    Hi Kaushik,
    Integration between MDM and ECC system can happen in one of the two ways :
    - File Adapter mechanism
    - ABAP Api mechansim
    In the file adpater way as you already are aware of  we use XI in the landscape for exchanging data between ECC and MDM in the form of Idocs and XML as the MDM systema dn R/3 system cannot talk to each other directly.
    One is an ABAP based system and one is a C++ designed windows based system.So we use PI/XI for master data transfer and monitoring.
    To know more on this method kindly refer the below link:
    /people/balas.gorla/blog/2006/09/27/mdm-xi-r3-integration
    /people/balas.gorla/blog/2006/09/27/mdm-xi-r3-integration
    The second method is that of using the ABAP Api.using this method the ABAP system can directly connect to the MDM system using the API's and perform the data management activities from within ECC system.
    To know more on this method kindly refer the below link:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/601ddb01-e5c8-2910-d981-b190b51fca44
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3478
    The methods of integartion used so far with MDM and ECC are the two mentioned above.
    but using them you can build many scenrios like:
    - Extract all data from ECC and cleanse it in MDM
    - Create all master data centrally in MDM and syndicate to R/3
    - Create only Global data in MDM and send the data to R/3 to extent to local data and obtain the entire master record then in MDM.
    Hope It Helped
    Thanks & Regards
    Simona Pinto
    Besides these scenario you can also integrate MDM with ABAP using the front end system like EP wherein you access the ABAP transcation using the transactional Iviews. etc.

  • SRM 7.0 EhP 1 central contracts with service lines

    Hi,
    I have a question concerning the use of SRM 7.0 EhP1 central contracts with service line items. I know that for SRM EhP 1 you would require EhP 5 in ECC. However, since my organisation just went to EhP 4 last weekend I am wondering if there's any option to use services in central contracts without going to EhP 5 in ECC.
    Kind regards,
    Bastiaan

    Hi Laurent,
    Yes.
    When Central contract was designed in SRM 7.0 with ERP EhP4, it was designed with no service hierarchy. But in SRM 7.01 Central contral was enhanced to handle service hierarchy and it works with ERP EhP5. The problem is when we have SRM 7.01 and ERP EhP4. To handle this complication SRM 7.01 was designed to send flat service lines to EhP4 and lower release even though Central contract in SRM has service hierarchy. So while transfering to ERP EhP4 system in standard, all outlines are not consider for transfer and only service lines (Functional items) are transferred to ERP. To do so user needs to maintain the backend destination information of the connected backend system in table BBP_BACKEND_DEST via SM30 transaction with correct system type (for EhP4 system it will be ERP_4.0 and for EhP5 ERP_5.0). SAP Standard program checks this while XML generation for transfer and if system type is ERP_4.0 system it removes all outlines from temp table before generating the XML data. When it is done, ERP has only service lines in its XML and it does the manupulation to create the replication of central contract.
    Master Guide (Including Upgrade Information) - SAP SRM 7.01 states:
    "The use of SAP NetWeaver PI is optional but it is required for outbound XML-based messaging or for connecting non-SAP planning or execution systems."
    So service hierarchy is possible in SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 but only with PI. For other CCM functionalities, SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 without PI works fine.
    Best regards,
    Christian Zeuch

  • SRM-MDM - loading hyperlink field in import manager

    Hi forum members,
    I am having trouble loading the hyperlinks in for SRM-MDM in import manager.
    What fields / values do I need to map to load this please?
    I have mapped the hyperlink source field to the hyperlink destination field, but get an error during import executing saying there is an creating lookup table entry.
    Is anyone able to provide step-by-step details of which mappings are needed?
    Thanks very much,
    Nick

    Hi Nicholas,
    the non-qualifier for the hyperlinks table is the type. Therefore you need to also map this field. Please check note 1077701 (under 11.) on how to use the types.
    Let us know whether that helped.
    Best regards
    Christian

  • SRM Invoice posting without PO reference - Contract Management

    Dear experts,
    We are on SRM 701 with ECC 6.0, in ECS.
    Our requirement is to allow invoice posting in SRM, without PO reference. The invoice will only refer to an existing SRM central contract.
    We did all the relevant customizing and we were able to:
    Replicate SRM central contract to ERP, through PI;
    Invoice creation in SRM and posting in the backend (FI), through IDOCs.
    As far as I understood in this scenario, the invoice posting is made only through FI (not using MIRO).
    My expectation was to have the contract number in some field at the invoice document level, in the FI.  However there is absolutely no reference to the contract in the invoice document. Does anyone know if this is a standard behavior and/or any idea of how to achieve my requirement to have the contract number in the invoice posting?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Andreia

    Hi guys,
    Any thoughts on this?
    Thanks!
    Andreia

Maybe you are looking for

  • A Colour Management tutorial from an amateur

    Archiving at the end of a long project I came across a document I assembled at the start when I wanted to teach myself about colour management. I spent several weeks reading, experimenting and putting together these notes, but it all came to nought.

  • How to avoid the annoying little window that opens when I go to close a file?

    When I put my cursor near the x of a file tab to close a file, a little window opens over the x and I have to wait for it to dissappear before I can click on the x to close the file. The window that opens has the exact same text as the folder tab and

  • Audio from Final Cut Pro very very low

    Hi guys I have not have a problem for awhile. A friend of mine recently move from DPS Velocity system to Final Cut Pro Studio 2 using a Intel Pro 3.2GHZ with all the bell and whistle, so I am giving him some training and tutorial. They have some foot

  • F.27  ACCOUNT STATEMENT NOT PICKING OPEN ITEMS

    When I run F.27, and fillin all required fields, and click execute but get a message that no data exists. THough there are balances for this particular customer but in F.27, it is not picking up that customer. What am I missing. I have chosen the cor

  • How to retrieve Host Name from reports?

    Hi. I've a report with excel template with links inside (XDO_LINK_?...)... How can I create a link with a dynamic host name? Like http://<hostname>/xmlpserver/..... Thank you R.