SRM Outline PO line not unique with ECC PO line

Hi Experts,
We are using SRM 7.01 Extended Classic scenario. We have requirement in BI reporting for Shopping Cart and Purchase Order Overview Report.
There is 1 issue with Outline PO(PO created from external Requirement) in SRM. In SRM, it is created as Hierarchy line item(Parent- Child relationship).
For Ex. we have 1 PO with 2 lines in SRM as Outline PO with Hierarchy relationship means there are 2 lines as Outline and 2 lines as limit in SRM with line numbers as 1,2,3,5. When this PO is replicated in ECC, as only limit items gets replicated into ECC and not outline items but with numbering 1 and 3. Now my question here is why these line numbers are not at all matching in ECC. In SRM, it is 2 and 5 and In ECC, it is 1 and 3. This mismatch of line numbers is causing issue for report viewing to users as they verify same in SRM and ECC PO.
Is there any correction available or can be applied to have unique PO line numbers for Outline PO in SRM and ECC ?
I will be very thankful if prompt response is given here.
Thanking you..
Best Regards,
Kunal Sanghavi

hi
Check it out in material master, for the parrticular material inventory may be blocked either in basic data1 view or in purchasing view.. Check it out the x-plant block tab..
Reward if useful,
Yuvi.

Similar Messages

  • Error: crm production is not sync with ecc production

    Hi Middleware Experts,
    I am facing one issue, "CRM Production is not sync with ECC production". I have searched alot but couldn't find any relevant material. Please let me know the steps to rectify this error.
    Thanks,
    Vsh

    Hello,
    Sorry forget the last note I suggest you,
    Please check the following links might be helpful
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/28/370123814711d3ad6b0000e8a5bd28/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/46/57605601a208e7e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
    thanks
    Willie
    Edited by: Willie Musa on Jul 6, 2011 10:43 AM

  • Did SRM 4.0 can work together with ECC 6?

    Hi:
       We are in a process of upgrade, we are plannig to move from R3 4.7c to ECC 6, and also we have a SRM 4.0.
       Do you know if it is possible to SRM 4.0 to work with ECC 6?? We want to know if we can stay our current version of SRM, and just upgrade R3 to ECC.
       Does anyone have this scenario implemented in your business?
       I'll appreciate your answers.
       Best regards, Abraham
    Edited by: Abraham Delgado on Nov 24, 2009 10:37 PM

    HI Matthew wee are facing a similar situation with our sap landscape with upgrading an EEC5 to an ECC6 system, and we are also looking to upgrade SRM 4-7
    how successful were you with your project and what issues have you come across  ?
    any information would be greatly appreciated.
    Cheers
    James
    Edited by: James Ibbotson on Oct 13, 2010 3:21 PM

  • Work Clearance Management  (WCM) not available with ECC 6.0

    Hi All,
    Work Clearance Management (WCM) is a part of SAP Plant Maintenance (PM). It is a standard functionality. This is not available with our installed version of ECC 6.0 system.
    The navigation should be
    SAP Easy Access > Logistics > Plant Maintenance > Work Clearance Management.
    This is also not available on SPRO.
    But whenever we directly enter the T Code related to WCM, it allows me to go to that screen. But if we want to customize the WCM using the same method then the SAP standard configuration is missing.
    I need to get this functionality available on our system.
    Is it a part of SAP software component SAP_APPL ?
    But how do I get this ?
    Can anyone pls help me on this ?
    Thanks and warm regards
    Purnendu

    I think that WCM it's present as an extension set (i'm not quite sure if is EA-PLM or EA-SCM). When you configure it, the activities related in custominizg, will appear as well.
    Hope this help
    Ezequiel

  • Portal inbox not aligned with ECC inbox

    Dear experts,
    we are facing an issue between the portal inbox and ecc inbox.
    We run two processes through the same workflow and each process launchs a notification for the user.
    One of these notifications is shown on the portal inbox but the other one no. If we check the ECC inbox both notifications are displayed.
    Have you got any clue to investigate this strange case?
    a lot of thanks in advance
    best regards
    david

    dear Samuli,
    we tried to replicate the issue in our development environment and at the end the error with the sync was a authorisation issue. But, right now, we are facing another error (i will try to do the best to explain it)
    We have two users (userA and userB). The userA creates a new disposal list. The userB receives this notificatin on his inbox (in ECC and in Portal). The userB approves this disposal. The userA receive the approval notification and the modifies the equipment status from "Disposed" to another one to cancel the disposal (in my case i have selected "In Use"). In this moment the userB receives the cancelation notification on ECC but not in portal.
    Do you know what can be the problem? Do you have any clue?
    thanks a million Samuli
    best regards
    david

  • Hierarcy not transferred to ECC

    Hi Gurus,
    I created a shopping cart (multi-level outline service procurement sc) in EBP, but the problem is, the hierarchy/outline item was not transferred to ECC, the purchase order which generated in ECC don't have the hierarchy/outline item,  is there any customizing missing? Kindly please advise.
    Thanks and best regards
    Jack

    Hi Jack,
    We are facing the same issues.
    According to SAP no scenario is provided for service procurement using MM-SRV and SAP Supplier Self-Services (SUS) in the standard SRM system up to and including SRM 6.0.
    As of SRM7.0, but only in combination with ECC6.0 Enhancement Package 4, SAP has standardized the solution as far as possible.
    May be using ESOA we can configure the service procurement scenario.
    I would be glad if someone can shed more light on this.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • How is the integration with ECC in SRM 7.0??

    Hi,
    Working with SRM 5.0 or 5.5  the use of XI for integration with ECC is not mandatory because when we send any document from ECC to SRM like requisitions (to convert them in shopping cards) or when we send any document from SRM to ECC like shopping cards, PO´s, contracts,  we only use the RFC´s and the abap programs.
    Is the same behavior with SRM 7.0?????
    Could the integration from SRM 7 with ECC 6 work with RFC´S without XI or for this vertions is XI mandatory?????
    Thanks

    SRM70 is closely integrated with XI for transferring docs between ECC and SRM.  SAP introduces eSOA tech nology with SRM70 and hence all documents like PR from ECC to SRM, Central Contract from SRM to ECC, PO creation (Classic), etc uses this techn ology.
    Thanks,
    Jagadish

  • Central contract in SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0

    Hi
    We are using SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0
    When we create contract in SRM 7.0 & Trying to distribute to Backend as Contract, It is showing error in BBP_PD as below
    HEADER I1015 Awaiting Approval
    HEADER I1021 Created
    HEADER I1038 Complete
    HEADER I1141 Released
    HEADER I1180 Document Completed
    HEADER I1193 In Distribution
    HEADER I1195 Distribution Incorrect
    0000000001 I1143 Item is Active
    Badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSY is activated to define backend system
    No IDOC is also generated.
    No errors in MOnitor also
    Not sure what is message type needs to define & what else is needed
    Regards,
    NNK

    HI
    Need to do following
    1. Keep conidtion types in ECC & SRM same for contract.
    2. Also Add message types BLAORD & COND_A manually in ECC in WE20.
    Then only it works
    Regards,
    NNK

  • SRM 7.0 PO Condition are not copied in ECC po

    Hi Experts!!!
    i am facing the problem SRM 7.0 PO Condition are not copied in ECC po, Net price is Coming instead of Gross price. & is there any BADI why which i can Fecth the Condition Data From SRM Quotation to ECC.
    pls help me it is go-live critical.
    regards
    vikas

    Hi Masa,
    1. Do the texts need to be mapped in the  node that you hjave mentioned. Sould not the SRM texts be mapped to ECC textx by default . After all , it shoud be standard predelivered feature . I have not done any mapping but still the SRM supplier text in shopping cart line item , flows into ECC Material Text in ECC PO line item.
    i.e by default SRM supplier text in shopping cart line item = ECC Material Text in ECC PO line item.
    No other text from SRM SC or PO ir flowing into ECC PO
    Rgds
    Sumendra

  • Clariffications in MM SUS Scenario with ECC 6.0 backend and SRM 5.0

    Dear Team,
    We are implementing MM SUS Scenario with ECC 6.0 backend and SRM 5.0
    We need to following clarifications
    1 Once we create ASN in SUS, how to cancel the ASN. We are not able to see cancel button for ASNs
    2 When we create GRN in ECC against the inbound delivery and perform Return Delivery, this Return Delivery is getting updated in SUS. But the ASN status is not changing to canceled. We are not able to perform new ASN for this. Also invoice is being allowed for these ASNs. How to control the same.
    Request your inputs please
    Regards,
    Ravi

    HI can you tell me how you get it solve?
    thanks in advance.

  • SRM PO not created in ECC

    Hi All,
    We are facing a problem in SRM production system. The PO is created in SRM after approval completion. Now the PO is not creating in ECC prod system. We are getting the following error in SRM EBP.
    Comm. error checking account assignmt for purchase order 4100001309 in system HCPCLNT100     
    How does the PO replicate to ECC system?Is there any place to see where is the log?
    Please help as this is very high priority.
    Reg,
    Bis

    Hello Bis,
    Try to re-send PO to backend using application monitor in WEBGUI.
    If it does not solve your problem, create a new PO with same PO type and account assignment data, but directly in R/3 backend: you will get R/3 error. It should give you clues.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Problem with BP. Assignment: Business partner person to user not unique

    I have a problem with a user. They have no BP assigned in PPOSA_BBP. We have found a BP in transaction BP.
    When we try the BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE the message BBP_UM_UI048 appear" Assignment: Business partner person to user not unique" .
    Any idea about how solve this??
    Best regards
    Jorge

    Hi
    Which SAP version are you using ?
    The user needs to be attached to the Org Plan. (PPOMA_BBP)
    Have you maintained the Contact person for this USer in the Org Plan. (PPOMA_BBP) ?
    Please check the consitency of this BP as well.
    Have you read the documenattion of the Transaction -> BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE ?
    If no, here it is..
    Transaction -> BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE
    Short text
    Object Synchronization and Repair
    Purpose
    This report enables you to run a consistency check for the integration of HR Master Data and Business Partner data. If not all data exists for the business partner, you can first synchronize data. When synchronization is run for organizational units, the basic data (name, description) and the address data is included; when synchronization is run for central persons, bank information is included in addition to the basic data and address data.
    Prerequisites
    To be able to run this report, integration between Organizational Management and SAP Business Partner must be active.
    Features
    This section contains information about the functions you can use to select and output data.
    Selection
    The following options enable you to restrict the selection of objects:
    Central Person
    In addition to selecting central persons created during integration between HR Master Data and Business Partner data, you can also select central persons who have been created locally. However, central persons created locally are not checked for consistency.
    Employee (object type P)
    This selection option is only available in HR systems. The corresponding central person is displayed together with the person. Both objects are kept consistent in the Basic Data, Address, and Bank Data columns.
    Positions
    Business Partners (Employee role)
    Users
    Organizational Unit(s)
    You can specify specific organizational units for the selection.
    Business Partner (Organizational Unit role)
    Note:
    The selection objects Position, Business Partner (Employee role), User, and Business Partner (Organizational Unit role) are only available if an implementation of BAdI HRALX_HRALXSYNC_BADI exists.
    Branch as of Organizational Unit
    This option enables you to select all objects in the structure for one or more organizational units. You can also restrict selection according to one of the following object types:
    Central Persons Only
    Employees Only
    Positions Only
    Business Partners Only (Employee role)
    Users Only
    Organizational Units Only
    Business Partners Only (Organizational Unit role)
    Include All Object Types
    Changes Since
    All organizational units and central persons for which changes have been made since the last time all objects were synchronized are read. When all objects have been synchronized successfully, a new change date is set.
    Note:
    If a selection has been made but the relevant input field remains blank, all objects of a particular object type are read from the database. This condition can lead to a long runtime, therefore, SAP recommends you also enter a restriction.
    Output
    The organizational units and central persons that have been found are displayed in a list that includes status data.
    To facilitate navigation, a hierarchical tree structure is displayed on the left-hand side of the object list. The branches are sorted according to the type of action that is to be executed.
    If an implementation of BAdI HRALX_HRALXSYNC_BADI exists, checks from this BAdI are executed in the External Checks branch.
    If you double-click on the folder icon in the navigation tree, all objects are displayed in the list.
    Note:
    Meaning of status display for data in the Basic Data, Address, and Bank Data columns:
    Icon Message Text Meaning
    Green traffic light Business partner does not need to be synchronized with HR object data All business partner data is consistent with HR object data.
    Yellow traffic light Business partner does need to be synchronized with HR object data Business partner exists. The business partner data is not consistent with the HR object data.
    Red traffic light Object data is new and must first be created for the business partner The business partner does not yet exist or the the business partner data is incomplete.
    No traffic light Object type does not include this type of data Check type is not relevant for this object.
    Activities
    To integrate business partners or to repair selected objects, you must select the relevant lines in the object list and choose Execute. Any errors that occur are displayed after synchronization.
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Changes to Limit Orders in SRM do not replicate to ECC

    Hello Gurus,
    I am using SRM 7.02 Extended Classic with ECC 6.0.  We are having issues when making changes to a Limit Purchase Order.  Once the change is made and Ordered, the information does not update the ECC PO.
    An additional output must be generated to update the backend system.
    I have found some information on SRM 5 but not for 7.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Mary

    Hi,
    I thyink the replication to backend happens by RFC FM. what you can do is take the GUID of PO and run BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC FM. before doing this put a BP in FM B46B_DPO_TRANSFER at code where FM  BBP_PO_INBOUND is called. Here you will come to know what data exactly is getting passed to ECC.
    thanks,
    sankar.

  • SRM 7 ehp1 with ECC 6 ehp5?

    Gurus,
    Is it mandatory to use SRM 7 ehp1 with ECC 6 ehp5? Our client has ECC 6 ehp 4 and is now upgrading from SRM 4 to SRM 7 ehp1. Can you share some links where I can confirm if SRM 7 ehp1 with ECC 6 ehp5 is mandatory?
    Also pl let me know what is the difference between shopping cart creation in SRM 4.0 and SRM 7.0 ehp1. SAP says they have changed something and made it more user friendly. Is it different from normal SRM 7 (without the ehp component?)
    Regards,
    John

    Hi,
    There are 3 ways of sending PO from SRM to ECC
    1.Via - RFC ( by setting the system landscape to a lesser version ) it will not have any side effects just that it used RFC connections instead of ESOA
    2.Via PI - by setting  the landscape to the current version and configure the relevant XML services in the SOAMANGER
    3. via Non PI Web Services- by setting the landscape to current version . This time the webservices are configured in SRM system itself.
    I have configured transfer of Contracts from SRM 7.01 to ECC 6.5 EHP5 as Contract/ Scheduling Agreement to the backend with Non PI Web Services(via XML). This way we didnt have to install PI at the client place which saved them a lot.
    I have written a blog on how to transfer central contracts from srm to ecc using web services but without PI , please find the link below and hope it is helpful.
    http://scn.sap.com/community/pi-and-soa-middleware/blog/2012/06/13/transfer-of-central-contract-from-srm-to-ecc-using-web-services-without-pi
    Regards,
    Naveen

  • SRM Sync with ECC

    HI Everyone,
    We are using Classic Approach and the SRM is integrated with ECC. Now we have a problem after doing client copy. We have done client copy only for Quality from PRD in ECC and not for SRM PRD to quality. So there is no proper sync between the SRM Quality and ECC quality. Hence the integration is not proper and the documents are not generated in the ECC quality.
    Please guide me the procedure of how to sync the ECC with SRM qualtiy.
    Thanks.
    Siva

    When system is copied from other systems all Logical systems and RFCs will be pointing to the old system. You need to run T-code BDLS for changing the Logical systems to the current systems. Then delete all master data like Material groups, Materials master, Vendors and then re replicate. This should solve your issue.
    Thanks,
    Jagadish

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issue while using FM L_TO_CREATE_POSTING_CHANGE

    Hi All, We are facing an issue when creating a transfer order using the FM L_TO_CREATE_POSTING_CHANGE. We have developed a custom program to change the status (Zfield) of a specific SU in LQUA and update its stock category. The program creates the ma

  • My ipad wont open after update to 6.1.3 failed

    I updated my ipad mini (newly opened) to 6.1.3 from 6.1 last night, but when the download finished and the ipad rebooted to start the update, a prompt message pop out saying that update failed. Now I can't open my Ipad mini. Tried pressing the home b

  • Vendor Down Payment should not exceed Total PO Value

    Dear All, We want to restric the Vendor Down payment to total PO value and system must not allow to post the Down payment more that Total PO value. Eg. Material value - 1000 Tax                     100 Other charges    150 Total PO Value - 1250/- Now

  • Getting the context path in a jspx

    Greetings i have in a JSP this code <div id="footerpartners"><img src="<%=request.getContextPath()%>/images/aval.png" width="68" height="26" /><img src="<%=request.getContextPath()%>/images/ath.png" width="79" height="26" /><img src="<%=request.getCo

  • What is the best (easiest) way to create thumbnails?

    From (image) files selected via JFileChooser, what is the best way to create thumbnails so they can be immediately displayed?