SRM SUS CLIENT
Hi,
What are the pros and cons of having SRM-SUS insatlled in one box to those installed in differnt box.What is the criteria for deciding wether to go for one box or seperate box installation.
In my previous project the only reason we went for 2 Box was security concern is there any technical reason for 2 box
have seen the OSS note 573383 which gives some idea about pros and cons of installing SRM-SUS in one client in one BOX only.
Regards
Hi,
the client is the main difference. Several boxes are mainly a matter of money in terms of Hardware as well Maintenance. I am not sure it that would also count as two different implementations and therefore more license costs. Implementation means to set up basically two SRM systems, where one becomes a SRM Baby and the other the SUS Baby. A bit more effort.
For the pro side the same like for the clients count. SUS can be maintained separately as well security does not get a headache cause external users can be hold more easily in front of the firewall.
These are my two cents.
Cheers,
Claudia
Similar Messages
-
PO replication from SRM to SRM -SUS
Hello Guys
How to replicate a PO from SRM to SRM SUS Client in case of PO created in SRM SUS scenario.
Any configuration and back ground job needs to be scheduled. Also for the corresponding documents from SRM to SUS and Vice versa.
Second, why middle ware PI is used for replication of vendors from SRM to SRM SUS as they both deploy on same system with different client.
Please reply guys
Thanks.
Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:53 AM
Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:53 AM
Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:57 AMHi Santosh,
As you are using extended classic scenario for transferring PO from SRM EBP to SRM SUS.
You can schedule a report RSPPFPROCESS for every minute with following varient
Application - BBP_PD
Action Profile - BBP_PD_PO
Action Defination - STANDARD_PO
Promotion Status - (0) Not Processed
and also select Processing withhout dialog checkbox.
Regards,
Pawan Keshwani -
Dear Experts,
Need your help.
We are planning to implement MM SUS on SRM one client.
I have some questions/ doubts before starting the implementation could you please help me to answer them
Do we need PI to have a connection between SRM and MM
because its SRM one client SRM is add-on to ECC I mean on the same server?
b. Do we need to have separate client to implement SUS and
SRM as we generally do in case of separate SRM system ?
Thanks & Regards
Ankit JainHi Ankit,
a, If you are going to use MM-SUS scenario, then XI is a must. Because you will need XI for message exchange for Supplier Self registration,PO Response, ASN, GR , Invoice creation
b, Yes, it is recommeded to implent SUS in a separate client than SRM.
Regards,
Ivy -
SRM "one-client" installation on ECC 6.0 EhP: Own client needed for SRM?
Hello experts,
i've a question concerning the SRM "one-client" installation on ECC 6.0 EhP4 as Add-On.
Is it possible to use SRM and ERP funtionality in a single client e.g. 001?
Or do we have to use different clients on the system like for SUS?
I haven't found any information regarding this topic in SAP ressources. I'm currently using CG "SAP SRM on One Client in
SAP ERP" Release date 2008 (found on marketplace/srm-inst --> srm7.0); SRM - Technical Basis Configuration (BuildingBlock S00/S03). I'm facing problems while going through the following customizing steps:
Assign logical System to Client [both logicall systems are on the same client (001)] ==> error while trying to reference the second logical sys. because client (001) cannot be used again (own presumption: error message differs)
I've seen that some of you have successfully installed and customized this szenario. If someone could provide me any helpful information or guideline how to proceed in general... would be great...
Best regards,
PATRICKThanks for your reply. I've checked the offline documentation because i've no access to solman.
There is a document which describes the steps for configuring one-client customizing on marketplace.
Link: [SAP SRM 7.0: SAP SRM on One Client with SAP ERP|https://websmp203.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001201562009E]
The problem is that its impossible to cofigure the system like it's described in the document.
Let me explain why...
SRM Addon is installed and customizing is done in client 001 (same client as erp)
overview about defined logical systems:
-ONECLNTERP (for ERP is defined)
-ONECLNTEBP (for SRM is defined)
When I try to assign the logical system to client 001 it works for the first entry
for the second log. system it shows up an error message.
-->I assume because client 001 has been already assigned. I cant use client 001 again.
But One-Client szenario schould be possible in a single client or is SAPs One-Client more like One-System with differnet clients for SRM and ERP on the same machine?
Because of the above mentioned problem I assume that it's impossible to run ERP and SRM in the same Client number.
Am I right? Do I have to use two Clients on One System for proper Customizing?
Or if it's possible to use a single client on one machine for both ERP and SRM how is it possible to assign two log. systems to one client number?
I'm totally confused. Any help would be appreciated - any tips/hints/experiences from someone who has customized One-Client?
BR, Patrick -
SRM-SUS Scenerio Replicating company code and suppliers to SUS via XI
We have configured SRM-SUS scenario. We have SRM and SUS on the same system but different clients. We have configured extended classic scenario. We are on SRM 2007 with SP5
Issue:
When I execute transaction BBP_SP_COMP_INI I get no errors. I check SXMB_MONI in my SUS client and it has processed correctly. However it does not update table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP. I check SLG1 in SRM and SUS and get messages that data replicated.
When I execute transaction BBP_SP_SUPP_INI to move the SRM suppliers to SUS I check SXMB_MONI and everything processed correctly. However, when I check table VENMAP there are no entries.
I then create a PO and send to SUS. I get the following error:
Error in an XI interface: No partner found for partner number VNDR_ACCT_ Program: SAPLBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPING; Include: LBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPINGF11; Line: 436
When we debug the proxy it is trying to validate our SRM company code (VNDR_ACCT) in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP which is empty.
It appears that SUS is not allowing the creation of external partners. Does SRM to SUS transfers utilize the BP number range table which distinguishes external and internal BPs which is used when replicating suppliers between ECC and SRM.
Has anyone ever encountered this issue before?
Please advise.
Thanks.
JoeHello Nikhil:
I think my issue is that the XI proxys' are not being updated in SUS. It appears to me that it is similar to when you are executing BBPGETVD between ECC and SUS (MM-SUS) and the BP number range in SUS is not set to accept external BPs.
So, When I execute BBP_SP_SUPP_INI and send SRM suppliers to SUS how does it know the VG5XXXXXXX. When I replicate BBPGETVD I tell the VG5XXXXXXXX. I did configure the "Managing Business Partners" SUS configuration but we are not using supplier registration so I do not have URL for UM or Notification. I did update the "Central Vendor Group" , "Default Purchase Org", and "Currency". Does XI use this setting to know where to assign the vendors or is there another piece of configuration I missed?
What I did to create the entry in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP is I executed transaction BBP_SUS_BP_ADM and entered in the "Company Code" field the BP from my SRM system assigned to my ECC backend company code . In the log sys field I entered the log sys of my SRM cleint. I then completed the other required fields. In the end it created the following entry:
101 4CF3AE33A6036B71E10000000AF8EF08 ERACLNT100 0001 0000000018
Client 100 is SRM and 101 is SUS.
I am able to configure SUS for MM_SUS and replicate suppliers and company code from ECC to SUS. However, this does not use XI. For thois reason I think my issue is a missing piece of config to tell XI where to create external business partners?
When I check the payload of my SRM PO it does not show the company code but uses BP 18 which is the SRM BP for my backend company code. When I check BBP_PD for this PO in SRM it has my company code as "BE CO_ CODE"
Do you have any more suggestions?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Joe -
SRM SUS using PI in Extended Classic Scenario
Hi SRM Gurus,
We are in SRM 5.0 ,extended classic scenrio and plan to implement SUS for PO create/Change,PO response and
ASN.We plan to use PI for this integration and as per Note 573383 our IT team plans to use two different client
(one for EBP) and other for SUS.Does anyone have a config guide for this scenario??
In this scenario what all configuration are to be done on SRM(EBP) side??Do I need to configure PO/PO response and ASN number ranges for SUS?
Do I need to create a new vendor org structure in SUS client so that I can replicate SRM/EBP vendor to SUS??
What all settings are to be done on PI side.
Any help/documentation in this direction would be appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Priyafew answers to your questions
1) what is the release of SRM you want to work with?
2) services in SUS is not available as standard , and will be provided by SAP as consulting up on request.
3) for hardware requirements , please refer to the master guide for the srm release you will be working on -->
and also you can refer to the software component matrix in master guide --> to see if any component is mandatory..
4) XI and MDM as far as i know is mandatory for SRM 6.0 and above , But in SRM 5.0 , XI is compulsory.
5) so xi is mandatory in anyway in SUS as different systems are involved and therefore is required for routing the documents correctly.
6) time for installation again depends on your supplier base , and your level of expertise.
7) it is not always recommended to compare between two different systems , R/3 and SUS are different and so functionality will not be the same
8) but as far as i know R/3 is stronger functioanlly.. -
SRM - SUS no transaction committed
We are implementing ECC to SUS for Direct Materiall and SRM - SUS for indirect Material. ECC to SUS is working for all processes ( Vendor replication, PO, SAR, PO confirmation, ASN, Invoice).
SRM- SUS is not working. XML is send successfully from SRM to SUS but no transaction is committed. SRM and SUS are on same server but different Client.
JigarHi Jigar
What is the status of XML messages in SRM. Are the messages processed in your SRM Client.
Which transaction is not committed?
Regards
Virender Singh -
Hi All,
My client requirement is Payment of IT service charges to IT Vendor.Right Now it is Manual (Posting directly to GL account).
We want to integrate this process i SAP-MM and SRM-SUS. I heared about Time sheet process from SRM.
can anybody give the process flow for Time sheet application process through SRM-SUS.
regds
Ramireddypost this query to SRM forum
yogesh -
Does SRM SUS support contract negotiation from supplier point of view?
Dear experts,
could you please share your view on whether SRM sus support contract handling? can a supplier monitor contract fulfillment or potential expiry of a contract from SRM SUS side? can supplier take part in contract re negotiation from SUS side?
As far as I know, SRM 7.01 supports scheduling agreement release in SRM SUS.
Your thoughts will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
RanjanDear Sam,
Thanks for the reply. Then, can we enable our suppliers to monitor contract from Supplier Portal in the SRM server itself like the way Suppliers can participate in the bidding in the SRM server? Any thoughts or input will be highly appreciated as my client wants to enable suppliers to monitor expiry of the contracts from their side.
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan -
Integration Builder Configuration. SRM/EBP ---- XI ------ SRM/SUS
Hi Masters of SRM.
could you please show how make the configuration in XI into Builder configurations
the scenario is SRM/ebp -
> XI -
> SRM/SUS
any guide because I have the guide for the ERP----> XI -
>SUS. but does not my requirement.
the both systems are in same box but different client.
thanks for yours atentionsThanks: Nichil.
I follow your instructions., when I make simulation in Generation Log. show all lights in yellow color for example:
Receiver Determination(s):
| SRD_009 | PurchaseOrderRequest_Out | * | *
Analysis
Required sender communication component: | SRD_009 A receiver determination was found for the connection All receivers are contained in the receiver determination found
Results
The reused receiver determination is already assigned to the configuration scenario
Notes
Check the conditions for all receivers of the receiver determination. The default result value for the generated condition is: TRUE
I am message for test and I can see the message into PI the estatus is Recorded and flag is color Green.
but no show an error or problems only stay in Recorded Status , othe observation into the SXMB_MONI the fiel Receiver component and Receiver Interface are empty,
what you suggets ?
best regards. -
Could not able to see POs in URL (SRM-SUS-MM) Scenario
Hi All,
We have created a PO in MM(R/3) and was transferred to SUS through XI.
We could able to see the PO in TCode BBP_PD in SRM-SUS. But for some reason we are not able to see the PO from the URL.
We have Purchaser (SRM_ADMIN) and Vendor (ARAMI-02) assigned the roles SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER and SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR respectively.
My Org Structure is as follows:
We have an Organization defined as company. Function CCode deifined.
We have an POrg defined as POrg Function POrg Defined.
We have an Pgrp defined as PGrp Function PGrg Defined.
We have defined vendor Org. haven't assigned anything in function tab.
But defined some attributes needed for Vend Org.
The PO is coming into transaction BBP_PD(SRM SUS) through XI from MM R/3 but is not available in URL either for Purchaser or for Vendor.
Please tell me what needs to be done to resolve the above issue.
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Ravi..Hi
<b>Yes sure.. Ask BASIS Team to help out and add the required role / profile to the required User, who is unable to see the POs.</b>
<u>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes as well -></u>
<b>Note 852516 Buyer administrator is not able to view supplier documents</b>
Note 854910 Buyer administrator is able to change status for invoices
Note 818385 Purchaser Admin has wrong authority to change invoices
Note 1024327 Short dump when trying to open a vendor message
Note 1032800 Error opening a vendor message in SUS
Note 1029356 Error opening a vendor message in EBP&SUS in one client
Note 884905 No SUS alerts displayed in BP SuCo 2.0
Note 743084 Missing status 'rejected' for Order in Menu
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul -
SRM-SUS for Service Entry Sheets - Classic Scenario
Hi SRM Gurus,
Our client wants to use SRM-SUS for the Service Entry Sheets (to being with and then later expand more in other SRM areas). The lead system will be R/3 system.
We will be going with ECC 6.0 and SRM 5.0.
Service Order will be created in R/3 and replicated into SRM (SAP have said this is new functionality in SRM 2007 and SAP will provide us with this functionality in SRM 5.0 as well)
SAP are also recommending using MDM for hosting the catalogs for service entry sheets to enable vendors to selete their items during the confirmation / filling the service entry sheets. - they say this is mandatory
SAP are also asking for XI for the data to be transferred from R/3 to SRM (and may be vice versa) - they say this is mandatory.
Few questions:
1) What kind of hardware size are we talking about to have SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal (PI)
2) Are MDM and XI mandatory as said by SAP and if yes, in what scenarios. What is they way around
3) How good is the functionality provided by SRM-SUS for Services? Is it as good as in R/3 (or even better)? We will be having complex Services in our scnearios.
4) What can be a typical time to install SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal in the Dev environment to get moving onto the project?
An early response shall be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Rahulfew answers to your questions
1) what is the release of SRM you want to work with?
2) services in SUS is not available as standard , and will be provided by SAP as consulting up on request.
3) for hardware requirements , please refer to the master guide for the srm release you will be working on -->
and also you can refer to the software component matrix in master guide --> to see if any component is mandatory..
4) XI and MDM as far as i know is mandatory for SRM 6.0 and above , But in SRM 5.0 , XI is compulsory.
5) so xi is mandatory in anyway in SUS as different systems are involved and therefore is required for routing the documents correctly.
6) time for installation again depends on your supplier base , and your level of expertise.
7) it is not always recommended to compare between two different systems , R/3 and SUS are different and so functionality will not be the same
8) but as far as i know R/3 is stronger functioanlly.. -
How can I enable GR to ouline agreement in SRM-SUS
Is it possible to post GR or multiple GR's to an outliine agreement in SRM5.5 server with SUS installed in DMZ and seperate XI box instance
Hi
<u>Refer to few links, which will help.</u>
<b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/1f/fba93e08503614e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/39/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
<u>Related Notes - Other related OSS notes</u>
Note 961363 SUS-MM order change scenario
887348 SRMSUS: FAQ for error analysis and logging OSS tickets
868192 Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
995388 MM-SUS: sending texts from SUS (ORDRSP) to R/3-MM
761150 MM-SUS: sending texts from SUS (ORDRSP) to R/3-MM
1015172 SRM 4.0 SP-Stack 03/2007 (SAPKIBKS11): Release Information
762984 SRM40-SUS: Implementation of customer enhancement fields
913711 ERP 2005 SP Stack 3 (02/2006) Release and Information Note
990172 1:n scenario EBP-SUS and MM-SUS in same SUS client
806022 Follow-on document control for SUS-MM scenario in SRM 4.0
904555 SRM 3.0 SP 10 (Stack 01/2006): Release and Information Note
759978 SRM3.0 SP07: Release and information note
Regards
- Atul -
Backup requirements for SRM/SUS
Hi Gurus,
is there any special reuirement for backing up the SRM and SUS system.
Regards!Normally when upgrade patches are applied to systems basis advise to backup the working clients
but have not heard about special back up for SRM-SUS.
BR
Dinesh -
Differences b/w ICH & SRM SUS
Hi SAP experts,
I would like to know the differences between SRM SUS & SCM ICH. Both are supplier collaboration systems bundled in two different solutions.
To my knowledge the only difference is, the inventory levels are seen in case of SCM ICH , but whereas in SRM SUS its not possible.
Experts please throw some light on this.
Thanking you in anticipation.
VasudevanHi
<u><b>Please go through this -></b></u>
<b>SAP Inventory Collaboration Hub (ICH)</b>
<u>
ICH is the supplier collaboration element covering tigher collaboration processes,
like forecasting, kanban, order management; it supports the production process,
but for e.g. does not cover invoicing. it is different than SUS, which focus
on small suppliers without any systems inhouse and only offers order managmt.
It depends on the environment, if you need SUS or / and ICH.
In longterm the SUS functionalities are planned to be integrated into ICH forming
a new product called Supply Network Collaboration offering all collaborative
processes.</u> - ICH is part of the SCM Suite as well found under Collaboratio Suite
- Installed on a separate Box; from SCM perspective it also makes sense to
separate APO and ICH; nevertheless SCM is a one client environment, like BW
- Documents are available via SCM and Solution Manager; search in the
Marketplace
Please find some info "ICH" in the SAP Service Marketplace. ICH is Inventory Collaboration Hub, Supplier Managed Inventory.
<b>http://service.sap.com</b>
<u><b>SRM SUS</b></u>
<u>SRM SUS can and should be used for Indirect material procurement. mySAP SRM provides a fantastic solution for transferring Purchase Orders from EBP to SUS for indirect materials and service items.
If you wish to integrate MM-SUS (which is primarily intended for direct materials) then you will have to use Classic Scenario. But then you will lose all Sourcing functionality in SRM.
ICH/SNC is intended for direct materials only. It does not support free text items or items bought for cost centers.
The ICH Purchase Order process is also intended for small suppliers - this is not a difference between ICH and SUS.
But ICH is only intended for purchase orders with a material.
Therefore the scenario is a deciding factor.
For indirect materials you are probably doing some purchase orders without materials, and these purchase orders can not be handled within ICH.
If you have only purchase orders with material items ICH can definitely be considered - and it is the tool for the future. A drawback of ICH is the master data complexity and this should be considered/evaluated before choosing ICH.</u>
<u>Go throrugh these link as well -></u>
<b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_snc2007/index.htm</b>
Re: SRM 6.0: ECS and SUS
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/60/4d424089ff2571e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/c3/4cdd5f39ad40eba8d0b78d987f2f4e/frameset.htm
<b>OSS Note - 936946 - SAP ICH Implementation note</b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/18/93e3caf97b457ca2a5c5ad72f971ce/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/e4/f5d5682cdd4108a01d42f3149253b5/frameset.htm
Re: ICH or Supplier Self Service ??
<u>Hope this will help. Do let me know.</u>
Regards
- Atul
Maybe you are looking for
-
Pick Data From Serial/USB ports
How can I pick Data from Serial/USB ports Machines I want to put Results into Database from Haematology Machine
-
FM which does Palletization while creating TO
Hi, I am trying to create and split Transfer order based on Palletization data in Material master. Do you know any FM which does that? I am using L_TO_CREATE_TR to create TO but I did not find any field which considers Palletization. Thank you, Jagad
-
BW QA system pointing towards different R/3 QA
Hello all, We have a situation here where HR is doing their QA testing in one box (DRQ) and FI is going to do their QA testing in different box (DRX) and the time difference between their testing in not much infact they will do the testing in the sam
-
Target node/queue unavailable
Hi Friends, Just Now I have completed my 2 node 11.5.10.2 installation on Linux...... (a) Database node on one machine ( Purely Database) (b) Application Tier on one Machine ( Forms,web, admin and Concurrent Manager) I have completed installation suc
-
My iphone 4 was stolen yeterday in a cafe. I have its IMEI and serial no so what could i do to get back or track my Iphone????? can anyone help me please????????????????????????