SRM SUS - confirmations process

Hello,
I have 2 questions, hoping you can provide help:
Question 1 - when supplier confirms the purchase order in SUS, is it possible for the supplier to go back into the purchase order and re-confirm order for different delivery dates or quantities (e.g. put back into "in process"). Currently the supplier is only able to do the ASN as the next step
Question 2 - is it possible for the supplier todo confirmations for schedule agreement releases, e.g. like we do for purchase orders? Currently supplier has "new" and "in process" status, and there is no collaboration on delivery dates and quantities back to the SAP R/3 system
We are using SRM v7 and SAP R/3 4.6c (and SAP PI)
Thanks

Hi Azam
It won't be possible for suppliers to change the PO response that they have entered initially.
Normally the PO response would go to SRM for approval by the buyer. If the buyer doesn't accept the POR they may send back and then the suppliers can enter a new one.
However if it is approved by buyer or Auto-approved( as in our case), suppliers won't be able to change that.
I imagine that it would be a complex development to change this behavior
Regards
Kedar

Similar Messages

Material PO confirmation at supplier side (SUS) not taking place in SRM SUS Extended classic scenario

We have configured extended classic scenario SRM with SUS, and all functions are working fine. However, at the time of PO confirmation of material item at the Supplier side (SUS), the material line item disappears when we click on the Create Confirmation button in SUS. The functionality is working fine for Service Items. The total value of PO is also displayed correctly in the Items overview section.
Please provide some help in solving this issue.

Hello,
This is the correct behaviour of SUS - confirmations can only be created for service items which in turn create service entry sheets (Trx: ML81N in ECC). And accepting the SES in ML81N will generate GR posting.
For material items, you have to create ASN which will in turn create inbound delivery in ECC which you can post and will generate goods movement documents.
So basically, for service items you create confirmation and for materials you create ASN.
Regards,
Prasanna

Confirmation process in SRM does not work whenever there is a discrepancy

Hello,
we are on SRM 5.0 version with classic scenario(follow on documents in backed system - ECC 5.0). to procure maintainence service user cretes a shopping cart by selecting describe requirements method and UOM at times in incorrectly asssigned as EA so upon shopping cart approval a follow on ducument (purchase requistion) is created in ECC as per config set up(in SRM). Buyer while coverting this purchase requisition to PO rectifies this erroe and chages the UOM of meausre to Hr and send a PO to vendor.
we are not bale to use confirmation feature in SRM to perform receipt of this service. is this how system works? any configration or a BADI needs to be usd to allow to perform confirmation in SRM even tough there is discrepancy in shopping cart UOM and Purcahse requsition UOM.
when thre is change in UOM in ECC that Purchase
*Confirmation process in SRM does not work whenever there is a discrepancy (i.e. different UM )between Shoping cart and Purchase Requisition related to that Shoping cart.*
we donot use serive option in SRM and donnot MM service module in ECC.
any help on this will be much appreciated.
Thanks,
sairam

The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
To Reset Firefox do the following:
#Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
#Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
#Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
#Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Please give me standard SRM SUS process Steps

SUS Gurus
I need Few clarifications about SRM SUS standard Cycle
we are using SRM 7.01 and Standalone scenario
1.Please give me standard SRM SUS process Steps
2.If the SUS supplier cannot meet all the terms specified in the original PO, Supplier changes them (items, quantities, delivery date, and so on),what is the next step for Purchaser?
3.If Purchaser approve the changed POR we r getting Change PO. But it is not triggering again for PO Response ?is it standard ?
4.If Purchaser reject the changed POR we r not getting Change PO.is it standard ?
5.what are possibilities for Change PO creation in SRM for SUS?
6.How can Vendor submit Response again and again till both parties agree on the terms of the PO?what changes does need from Purchaser/Vendor?
Regards,
Rama Krishna

Hi,
I hope this link helps:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50d08c99-f53f-2e10-c39f-b15e75329f03?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
Best Regards,
Otelo.

Service procurement from SRM-SUS

HI,
Pl guide me how to procure services from SRM-sus
Say supplier performs the services and confirmation in SRM-SUS so that SES will be created in R/3
and SES approval in R/3 and send back the SES no to SRM-sus.
pl share is thesre any documents regarding process flows etc
thanks
Rami

hi,
I Have created the service order with service activity in ECC6 and send the Idoc to SRM(version5)
in SRM i am not able to view the Serive Details. only item overview discription with 1 AU is displaying.
i want create ASN for actual service perofrmed by vendor.
EX PO item overview
item 10- painting at E Block 1 au value 1000
item details
activity no 100000000 - painting at E16.- 10 QTY- rs 100 and net value 1000
because i want to create ASN for 1 Qty,value Rs 100. how to get these details in portal?
system created inbound delivery after i have create the ASN in SRM . actually i want to create SES.
is there any confi required(process code etc).
help required
regds
Rami reddy

SRM - SUS no transaction committed

We are implementing ECC to SUS for Direct Materiall and SRM - SUS for indirect Material. ECC to SUS is working for all processes ( Vendor replication, PO, SAR, PO confirmation, ASN, Invoice).
SRM- SUS is not working. XML is send successfully from SRM to SUS but no transaction is committed. SRM and SUS are on same server but different Client.
Jigar

Hi Jigar
What is the status of XML messages in SRM. Are the messages processed in your SRM Client.
Which transaction is not committed?
Regards
Virender Singh

The Po Changed XML Message is in Error in SRM SUS

Dear Experts,
We are integrating ECC to SRM SUS system, and PO was successfully processed from PI and in SRM SUS we are getting below error.
<namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SE/Global">ExchangeFaultData</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage>
<SAP:Stack>Application has thrown an exception</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
And the message is in Inbound Q with status u201CXI Error Application Error .ABAP:Queue Stoppedu201D
Observed that messege was sucessfully processed from PI, and in error it is showing as XI Error.
Please help us to resolve the issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Soumya.

Hello,
What you can do is:
1.) Look for the name of the queue in SXI_MONITOR of SUS System
2.) Go to tcode SMQ2
3.) Input the name of your queue there
4.) Unlock your queue
Hope this helps,
Mark

Creating custom field in ASN screen of SRM SUS

Hi,
Our requirment is as follows
A custom defined field is to be created in the ASN screen under the Delivery Information block (under the field Bill of Ladding)
As in the normal scenario of ASN the shipment notification is sent to R/3 through XI. Now this new custom field is also to be sent to R/3 through XI in the normal way. This field carries a alphanumerical value
Could someone help us in this regard, how to create this new field in SRM and map it to XI
System Details:
SRM SERVER 5.5
SRM 5.0
XI 7.0
Regards,
Solai

Dear Solai
For addind new fields in SRM-SUS scenarios
First add an field in the inbound delivery in R3 tables
Second map the same in XI in the adapter engine in the mappping process
third add field at the table level in SRM also refer note 672960 where it is refering the INCL_EEW_* structures .
Secndly modify the template which is dispayed on the SUS portal .
Regards,
Nimish Sheth
do reward points for helpful answers.

Data Consistency when Copying/ Refreshing ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0 Systems

Hello,
We are planning a refresh / system copy of an ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0 system
The refreshes will be completed from backups taken of production systems refreshed onto the QA Landscape.
I have referenced the following SDN thread that provides some guidelines on how to refresh R/3 and SRM systems and maintain data consistency between the systems using BDLS and changing entries that correspond to backend RFC destinations:
[Is there a process/program to update tables/data after System Refresh?;
This thread is fairly old and relates to earlier versions of R/3 (4.7) and SRM (3.0). We have heard that at higher system versions there may be technical reasons why a refresh canu2019t be performed.
Does anyone have experience of completing successful refreshes of landscape that contain ECC and SRM systems at higher SAP versions (ideally ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0) Does anyone know whether it is technically possible?
Are there any additional steps that we need to be aware of at these higher SAP versions in completing the copy to ensure that the data remains consistent between ECC and SRM?
Thanks
Frances

I have seen this somewhere in the forum: See if this helps you
BDLS: Convertion of logical system (SRM).
Check entry in table TWPURLSVR.
Check RFC connections (R/3 and SRM)
SPRO, check or set the following points:
Set up Distribution Model and distribute it
Define backend system
Define backend sytem per product category
Setting for vendor synchronization
Numbe ranges
Define object in backend sytem
Define external services (catalogs)
Check WF customizing: SWU3, settings for tasks
SICF: maintain the service BBPSTART, SAPCONNECT
SE38:
Run SIAC_PUBLISH_ALL_INTERNAL
Run BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL
Update vendor BBPUPDVD
Check Middleware if used.
Run BBP_GET_EXRATE.
Schedule jobs (bbp_get_status2, clean_reqreq_up)
Convert attributes with RHOM_ATTRIBUTE_REPLACE

SRM-SUS - Extended Classic - Purchase Order Response

Hi folks,
We are using SRM-SUS in an Extended Classic scenario in SRM 5.0. When the Vendor creates a Purchase Order Response (POR) we want the Requisitioner of the Shopping Cart (not the Purchaser from the Purchase Order) to process the POR in EBP.
We will add the transaction Process Purchase Reponse to the Requisitioner role. We want to ensure that the Requisitioner can only see PORs related to Purchase Orders created from the Requisitioner's individual Shopping Carts.
Has anybody any suggestions and/or see obstacles in our way?
Cheers,
Pat

Hi Pat,
This is certainly not standard. I see the following challenges:
a. From the system perspective, your Shoppers will need to be assigned to purchasing group(s) in Org Structure to see the related PORs. That's very unusual, and consequences can be unpredictable.
b. From the internal controls / business process / security perspective, you may be creating some SOD (segregation of duties) issues.
IMHO, your business requirement needs to be re-visited. My two cents...
Cheers,
Serguei

PI 7.0 with SRM-SUS

Hello:
We want to install SRM-SUS and integrate it with MM and with other SRM installation. As we know we need PI for the integration. We've PI 7.0. Do you know if we need to migrate to 7.1 or the standard interfases for SAP-SUS can use PI 7.0 ?
Thanks in advance.
Fernando.

Hello:
We want to install SRM 7.01, is this version compatible with PI 7.0?. We suppose it, but it's a very recent version and we want to confirm this point.
Thanks again.

SRM - SUS setup

Hello Experts,
I am in the process of setting up a SRM-SUS scenario. I have replicated both purchasing companies and vendors. I get successfull messages in interface monitoring tool SXMB_MONI, but my problem is that neither the company nor the vendor is anywhere to be found. I have looked in the org/vendor structures, table BUT000, transaction BP. They are nowhere.
Where can I expect to find them? Have you ever had this problem? Do you know of a solution?
Regards
Rene

Hi Rene,
You can also check whether the vendors are successfully replicated or failed for some reason from the backend system in SLG1 transaction code. if your replicating for the first time, then write this Object --> BBPGETVD, put the correct dates when you replicated and Execute.
Check the LOG, it will tell the exact reason why the Vendor replication failed.
If you get the log and not able to analyze, please send the screen shot, i will help to analyze.
Check for other relevant Objects for SUS and you may get the log for what your missing.
Thanks.
From RBEI,
Snehal

SRM -SUS

HI,
Iam working on SRM 5.0 and Bi 7.0,
We implemented SUS in SRM and Getting Po's from R/3 to SRMm, so the thing is we Dint implememt EBP in SRM.
Now i want to Implement the same in BI system, Sap has few dats ources given for SRM,But unable to load them to BI as because EBP is required and Without EBP the data sources defined By SAP are not Compatable to Just SUS scenario..
i just want to Know is there anyone who had implemented SRM-SUS(Only Sus without EBP as we did ) and BW.
Can anyone guide me are let me know how the configuration took place..
Appropriate solution will be heavily rewarded.
Bye,
JSK.

Hello,
SUS is an add on software component for SRM.
e.g. For SRM server 5.5 SUS 3.0 is installed.
When SUS is required you need XI to be also installed.
Because for EBP , SUS becomes external system and you need to send messages in XML format only which is job of XI.
SUS is basically meant for external business partners i.e.suppliers
with SUS in picture ,the same can be used for supplier users creation , PO/SA confirmation, sending ASN shipping notification, Send invoices.
So basically used for supplier collabration.
I will send you some matl on yr ID.
BR
Dinesh
<b>Reward if helps</b>

SRM-SUS Scenerio Replicating company code and suppliers to SUS via XI

We have configured SRM-SUS scenario. We have SRM and SUS on the same system but different clients. We have configured extended classic scenario. We are on SRM 2007 with SP5
Issue:
When I execute transaction BBP_SP_COMP_INI I get no errors. I check SXMB_MONI in my SUS client and it has processed correctly. However it does not update table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP. I check SLG1 in SRM and SUS and get messages that data replicated.
When I execute transaction BBP_SP_SUPP_INI to move the SRM suppliers to SUS I check SXMB_MONI and everything processed correctly. However, when I check table VENMAP there are no entries.
I then create a PO and send to SUS. I get the following error:
Error in an XI interface: No partner found for partner number VNDR_ACCT_ Program: SAPLBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPING; Include: LBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPINGF11; Line: 436
When we debug the proxy it is trying to validate our SRM company code (VNDR_ACCT) in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP which is empty.
It appears that SUS is not allowing the creation of external partners. Does SRM to SUS transfers utilize the BP number range table which distinguishes external and internal BPs which is used when replicating suppliers between ECC and SRM.
Has anyone ever encountered this issue before?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Joe

Hello Nikhil:
I think my issue is that the XI proxys' are not being updated in SUS. It appears to me that it is similar to when you are executing BBPGETVD between ECC and SUS (MM-SUS) and the BP number range in SUS is not set to accept external BPs.
So, When I execute BBP_SP_SUPP_INI and send SRM suppliers to SUS how does it know the VG5XXXXXXX. When I replicate BBPGETVD I tell the VG5XXXXXXXX. I did configure the "Managing Business Partners" SUS configuration but we are not using supplier registration so I do not have URL for UM or Notification. I did update the "Central Vendor Group" , "Default Purchase Org", and "Currency". Does XI use this setting to know where to assign the vendors or is there another piece of configuration I missed?
What I did to create the entry in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP is I executed transaction BBP_SUS_BP_ADM and entered in the "Company Code" field the BP from my SRM system assigned to my ECC backend company code . In the log sys field I entered the log sys of my SRM cleint. I then completed the other required fields. In the end it created the following entry:
101 4CF3AE33A6036B71E10000000AF8EF08 ERACLNT100 0001 0000000018
Client 100 is SRM and 101 is SUS.
I am able to configure SUS for MM_SUS and replicate suppliers and company code from ECC to SUS. However, this does not use XI. For thois reason I think my issue is a missing piece of config to tell XI where to create external business partners?
When I check the payload of my SRM PO it does not show the company code but uses BP 18 which is the SRM BP for my backend company code. When I check BBP_PD for this PO in SRM it has my company code as "BE CO_ CODE"
Do you have any more suggestions?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Joe

EDI Standard used in SRM-SUS for Purchaser - Vendor Document Exchange?

Hi Forum,
For exchange of electronic documents like ASN, PO, PO Response, Confirmations etc. between buyer and seller, which EDI standard is used in SRM-SUS?
Say there are two different vendors one from North America using ANSI X 12 as EDI Standard and other from Europe using EDIFACT, how is the document exchange handled for these two different seller / edi standard in same SUS system?
Thanks,
Anubhav

Hi,
I am not sure what standard SAP uses, but it is not really relevant. At least not for the SUS scenarios. The IDOCs from ECC will be sent to the PI system which will convert them to XML format and send it to the SUS system. Since both PI and ECC system are from SAP, they will speak the same EDI standard for sure.
For SUS we have two scenarios, SRM-SUS and MM-SUS. In SRM-SUS the PO is created in an SRM system locally and sent to SUS. All communication will take place between these two system via XML messages on both sides (of course a PI system is mandatory in this case as well).
In the MM-SUS scenario the PO will be created in ECC and transferred to SUS. Depending on ECC release there are two different possibilities for this, either the ECC system sends EDI IDOCs or it sends XML messages directly. IDOCs will be mapped to XML by PI in all cases, as the SUS system will always receive and send XML messages only.
regards
Zoltan

SRM SUS - confirmations process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for