SRM - SUS, EBP,CCM,2007 Delta

Hi Gururs,
Could you please let me know what is meant by
SUS, EBP, CCM and 2007 Delta - all these are related to SRM
As i'm new and learning SRM i'd like to know the basic idea of the above
Regards
Bala
+91 98861 23202

Hi,
All are related to SRM
1)SRM SUS :: I SUS-Supplier Self Service.: In this vendor are linked with SAP SRM server the data will be exchanged from  SAP SRM server to the vendor WEB based service and vice versa
Each vendor will be given a User ID & Password.
The vendor can logon to the webportal to access the data related to him like
1. Purchase order details.
2.Goods receipt details (or) Confirmation in SRM
3.Invoice details etc.
2) EBP : Enterprise buyer professional, before SAP introduced SRM the e procurement is used to be done in SAP EBP.Currently we are in SAP EBP 5.0 Version
3) SAP CCM :: Catalog Content Management. SAP CCM is to maintain catalogs.
Catalogue is a defined set of data will be published in the Itnernet (or) intranet.
If a shopping cart is to be raised you can take data from the catalogue.
in the catalog for each material , vendor ,price is there .
Once shopping cart is ordered and it is approved. in the BACKEND (SAP R/3) or  in SAP EBP
itself P.O is created  .It is a Big area
G.Ganesh Kumar

Similar Messages

  • SRM EBP & CCM

    ALL,
    We are trying to push contracts to CCM from SRM / EBP 5.5.  When we try to click the Distribute the contract to catalog we can not. Is this a SRM config item? Any help would be great!

    Hi,
    All are related to SRM
    1)SRM SUS :: I SUS-Supplier Self Service.: In this vendor are linked with SAP SRM server the data will be exchanged from  SAP SRM server to the vendor WEB based service and vice versa
    Each vendor will be given a User ID & Password.
    The vendor can logon to the webportal to access the data related to him like
    1. Purchase order details.
    2.Goods receipt details (or) Confirmation in SRM
    3.Invoice details etc.
    2) EBP : Enterprise buyer professional, before SAP introduced SRM the e procurement is used to be done in SAP EBP.Currently we are in SAP EBP 5.0 Version
    3) SAP CCM :: Catalog Content Management. SAP CCM is to maintain catalogs.
    Catalogue is a defined set of data will be published in the Itnernet (or) intranet.
    If a shopping cart is to be raised you can take data from the catalogue.
    in the catalog for each material , vendor ,price is there .
    Once shopping cart is ordered and it is approved. in the BACKEND (SAP R/3) or  in SAP EBP
    itself P.O is created  .It is a Big area
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Integration Builder Configuration. SRM/EBP ---- XI ------ SRM/SUS

    Hi Masters of SRM.
    could you please show how make the configuration in XI into Builder configurations
    the scenario is SRM/ebp -
    > XI -
    > SRM/SUS
    any guide because I have the guide for the ERP----> XI -
    >SUS. but does not my requirement.
    the both systems are in same box but different client.
    thanks for yours atentions

    Thanks: Nichil.
    I  follow  your instructions.,  when I make simulation in Generation Log. show all lights in yellow color for example:
    Receiver Determination(s):
      | SRD_009 | PurchaseOrderRequest_Out | * | *
    Analysis
    Required sender communication component: | SRD_009 A receiver determination was found for the connection All receivers are contained in the receiver determination found
    Results
    The reused receiver determination is already assigned to the configuration scenario
    Notes
    Check the conditions for all receivers of the receiver determination. The default result value for the generated condition is: TRUE
    I am  message for test and I can see the message into PI the estatus is Recorded and flag is color Green.
    but no show an error or problems only stay  in Recorded Status , othe observation into the SXMB_MONI  the fiel Receiver component and Receiver Interface are empty,  
    what you suggets ?
    best regards.

  • FORMS in SRM EBP & SRM SUS

    Hi ,
    Supplier want to print Invoice / PO from SUS or Buyer want to print PO from SRM -EBP itself...in this case ,can anyone confirm me, whether we need to "define and use"  separte Forms/ Scripts for Purchasing documents like PO, Invoice ..etc in SRM EBP & SRM SUS  , other than that we use in backend ECC system ?
    Thank you in advance...
    Regards
    NAP

    You must need to maintain a specific smart form for PO/Invoice Output in SRM.
    Smartform/Script defined in ECC cann't be used for output in SRM.
    Sandip

  • Sending RFQs from SRM EBP to SRM SUS

    Hi All,
    Am having scenario that i need to send RFQs from SRM EBP to SRM SUS.
    & SAP provided Standard Content & that was imported in to IR.
    In EBP I have Standard Interface for RFQ as RequestForQuotation_Create_Out in namespace http://sap.com/xi/EBP.
    In SUS am not having such type of standard interface as RequestForQuotation_Create_in.
    Can anybody please tell me which interface i can use or what terminology is using for RFQ in SUS.
    Best Regards
    siva

    Hi,
    Thanks for reply.
    We have done following
    1.Customer Settings - https://sandboxsrm5.bhelhyd.co.in:8400/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/bbp_bid_inv
    2. Maintain Systems for Synchronization of User Data -
    Function modules for Create, Change , Delete has been given with Activation & User procurement BP ID ticked.
    3. System parameter
    login/accept_sso2_ticket: 1
    login/create_sso2_ticket: 2
    4. STRUSTSSO2 - Can please elaboarte what exactly  we need to do?
    5. We have given Roles SAP_EC_BBP_BIDDER & SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER to vendor in SUS.
    We are not able see bids in Vendor login in SUS. but we are able to see PO's in same login.
    Regards,
    Shiva

  • RFQs From  SRM EBP to SRM SUS

    Hi All,
    Am having scenario that i need to send RFQs from SRM EBP to SRM SUS.
    & SAP provided Standard Content & that was imported in to IR.
    In EBP I have Standard Interface for RFQ as RequestForQuotation_Create_Out in namespace http://sap.com/xi/EBP.
    For SUS am not having such type of standard interface like RequestForQuotation_Create_in Standard content.
    Can anybody please tell me which interface i can use or what terminology is using for RFQ in SUS.
    Thanks in Advance
    Best Regards
    siva

    Hi,
    Any Thoughts?
    Best Regards,
    Siva

  • SRM-SUS - Extended Classic - Purchase Order Response

    Hi folks,
    We are using SRM-SUS in an Extended Classic scenario in SRM 5.0.  When the Vendor creates a Purchase Order Response (POR) we want the Requisitioner of the Shopping Cart (not the Purchaser from the Purchase Order) to process the POR in EBP. 
    We will add the transaction Process Purchase Reponse to the Requisitioner role.  We want to ensure that the Requisitioner can only see PORs related to Purchase Orders created from the Requisitioner's individual Shopping Carts.
    Has anybody any suggestions and/or see obstacles in our way?
    Cheers,
    Pat

    Hi Pat,
    This is certainly not standard. I see the following challenges:
    a. From the system perspective, your Shoppers will need to be assigned to purchasing group(s) in Org Structure to see the related PORs. That's very unusual, and consequences can be unpredictable.
    b. From the internal controls / business process / security perspective, you may be creating some SOD (segregation of duties) issues.
    IMHO, your business requirement needs to be re-visited. My two cents...
    Cheers,
    Serguei

  • SRM -SUS

    HI,
    Iam working on SRM 5.0 and Bi 7.0,
    We implemented SUS in SRM and Getting Po's from R/3 to SRMm, so the thing is we Dint implememt EBP in SRM.
    Now i want to Implement the same in BI system, Sap has few dats ources given for SRM,But unable to load them to BI as because EBP is required and Without EBP the data sources defined By SAP are not Compatable to Just SUS scenario..
    i just want to Know is there anyone who had implemented SRM-SUS(Only Sus without EBP as we did ) and BW.
    Can anyone guide me are let me know how the configuration took place..
    Appropriate solution will be heavily rewarded.
    Bye,
    JSK.

    Hello,
    SUS is an add on software component for SRM.
    e.g. For SRM server 5.5 SUS 3.0 is installed.
    When SUS is required you need XI to be also installed.
    Because for EBP , SUS becomes external system and you need to send messages in XML format only which is job of XI.
    SUS is basically meant for external business partners i.e.suppliers
    with SUS in picture ,the same can be used for supplier users creation , PO/SA confirmation, sending ASN shipping notification, Send invoices.
    So basically used for supplier collabration.
    I will send you some matl on yr ID.
    BR
    Dinesh
    <b>Reward if helps</b>

  • SRM-SUS Scenerio Replicating company code and suppliers to SUS via XI

    We have configured SRM-SUS scenario.  We have SRM and SUS on the same system but different clients.  We have configured extended classic scenario.  We are on SRM 2007 with SP5
    Issue:
    When I execute transaction BBP_SP_COMP_INI I get no errors.  I check SXMB_MONI in my SUS client and it has processed correctly.  However it does not update table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP.  I check SLG1 in SRM and SUS and get messages that data replicated.
    When I execute transaction BBP_SP_SUPP_INI to move the SRM suppliers to SUS I check SXMB_MONI and everything processed correctly.  However, when I check table VENMAP there are no entries.
    I then create a PO and send to SUS.  I get the following error:
    Error in an XI interface: No partner found for partner number VNDR_ACCT_ Program: SAPLBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPING; Include: LBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPINGF11; Line: 436
    When we debug the proxy it is trying to validate our SRM company code (VNDR_ACCT) in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP which is empty.
    It appears that SUS is not allowing the creation of external partners.  Does SRM to SUS transfers utilize the BP number range table which distinguishes external and internal BPs which is used when replicating suppliers between ECC and SRM.
    Has anyone ever encountered this issue before?
    Please advise.
    Thanks.
    Joe

    Hello Nikhil:
    I think my issue is that the XI proxys' are not being updated in SUS.  It appears to me that it is similar to when you are executing BBPGETVD between ECC and SUS (MM-SUS) and the BP number range in SUS is not set to accept external BPs.
    So, When I execute BBP_SP_SUPP_INI and send SRM suppliers to SUS how does it know the VG5XXXXXXX.  When I replicate BBPGETVD I tell the VG5XXXXXXXX.  I did configure the "Managing Business Partners" SUS configuration but we are not using supplier registration so I do not have URL for UM or Notification.  I did update the "Central Vendor Group" , "Default Purchase Org", and "Currency".  Does XI use this setting to know where to assign the vendors or is there another piece of configuration I missed?
    What I did to create the entry in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP is I executed transaction BBP_SUS_BP_ADM and entered in the "Company Code" field the BP from my SRM system assigned to my ECC backend company code .  In the log sys field I entered the log sys of my SRM cleint.  I then completed the other required fields.  In the end it created the following entry:
    101    4CF3AE33A6036B71E10000000AF8EF08 ERACLNT100 0001       0000000018
    Client 100 is SRM and 101 is SUS.
    I am able to configure SUS for MM_SUS and replicate suppliers and company code from ECC to SUS.  However, this does not use XI.  For thois reason I think my issue is a missing piece of config to tell XI where to create external business partners?
    When I check the payload of my SRM PO it does not show the company code but uses BP 18 which is the SRM BP for my backend company code.  When I check BBP_PD for this PO in SRM it has my company code as "BE CO_ CODE"
    Do you have any more suggestions?
    Please advise.
    Thanks.
    Joe

  • Send vendor to SUS (EBP-SUS)

    Hi expets
    I would like to have contact with someone that uses EBP-SUS and replicate vendor from EBP to SUS in a scenario two clients.
    My problem is when I try to replicate vendor to SUS the BP is not created in SUS.
    I would like to know if I need to use BBPGETVD in SUS client too and after go SRM browser in manage busness partner and flag prortal vendor to send it to SUS.
    Thanks in advance
    Nilson

    Hi,
    Please go through these links ->
    Mandatory to enter at least one bidder for Public Bid Invitation
    Control functions available in Manage Business Partner
    Re: Impossible to submit shopping cart : vendor number not found
    Some related SAP OSS Notes ->
    Note 918588 SRM-SUS: Item processing for not existing items
    Note 890260 Contact person not replicated from SUS to EBP
    Note 754356 SUS-XI: Current SUS message mapping
    Note 887348 SRMSUS: FAQ for error analysis and logging OSS tickets
    Note 847538 SUS2.0: 'Object requested is currently locked by user'
    Note 738780 XML PO inbound: Error in several limit items
    Note 537922 SRM 2.0 SUS 1.0: Applying SP02 to Supplier Self-Services
    Note 554927 SRM 2.0 SUS 1.0: Applying SP03 to Supplier Self-Services
    Note 641960 - New processing of terms of payment in EBP 3.5
    BR,
    Vijay Mittal.
    (Plz award points for help)

  • Is both MM-SUS & EBP-SUS possible at a time ?

    Hi Gurus,
    SUS will be one of the most requiered functionality for Client and all POs need to send to Suppliers via SUS.
    We are mainly going to use Classic Scenarion ,where MM-SUS  fits perfectly. But at the same time Direct Materails ( Manually or automatically thru PDP as ext Req) will trigger Extended Classic Scenarion, as per SAP standard setting , although we configured all prodcut cat for Classic.
    So how we can send these POs ( genreted through Ext Classsic) to Suppliers ? Can we set both  MM-SUS & EBP-SUS at atime for all suppliers ,so that all orders will go to supplieres or any workout/option availble so that I will use only MM-SUS ?
    Plz help me.
    Regards
    NAP

    really  i dont know why SAP did not do anything for direct material PO in ECC itself.
    since many issues and customers are not happy some customers wanted to haveall  their PO in only ECC box  though direct or indirect material.
    SAP has to do something on this direct material po in classic mode . i dont know what type of technical snag there are having to do the same.
    Narendra:- Do some custom enhancement to clear the account assignment in the BADI so your sc for direct material will be created in ECC only not in SRM ( clear account assignments) .
    customer expectations are PO in ECC only for all materials in classic scenario without doing any enhancement.
    not applicable for you /fyi
    Note 1293572 - Account assignment is cleared in case of direct material
    When a material in purchase order is ordered as direct material, then default account assignement is cleared even though the customizing for accounting is maintained for the direct material in case of government procurement.
    Muthu

  • PO replication from SRM to SRM -SUS

    Hello Guys
    How to replicate a PO from SRM to SRM SUS Client in case of PO created in SRM SUS scenario.
    Any configuration and back ground job needs to be scheduled. Also for the corresponding documents from SRM to SUS and Vice versa.
    Second, why middle ware PI is used for replication of vendors from SRM to SRM SUS as they both deploy on same system with different client.
    Please reply guys
    Thanks.
    Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:53 AM
    Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:53 AM
    Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:57 AM

    Hi Santosh,
    As you are using extended classic scenario for transferring PO from SRM EBP to SRM SUS.
    You can schedule a report RSPPFPROCESS for every minute with following varient
    Application - BBP_PD
    Action Profile - BBP_PD_PO
    Action Defination - STANDARD_PO
    Promotion Status - (0) Not Processed
    and also select Processing withhout dialog checkbox.
    Regards,
    Pawan Keshwani

  • Supplier Self Service (SRM-SUS)

    Hi All,
    does anyone have or no of a definite list of which SRM-SUS fucntionality is available in
    Extended Classic Scenario
    Classic Scenario
    Standalone
    What I'm trying to find out is which scenarios the following are available in:
    PO exchange from EBP to SUS
    Catalogue Content Management via SUS
    Supplier Goods Receipting via SUS
    Supplier Invoice Receupting via SUS
    Cheers
    Chris

    please refer to the follwoing
    ·        The classic scenario
    The shopping cart is created and approved in SAP Enterprise Buyer. The remainder of the procurement process takes place in the backend ERP system(s) and all other follow-on documents, such the purchase order, goods receipt/service entry sheet and invoice, are located there. With SAP Supplier Self-Services, you have partial supplier involvement for the operational procurement business scenarios when buying materials. There is no support for services.
    ·        The extended classic scenario
    The shopping cart is created in SAP Enterprise Buyer. The purchase order and follow-on documents are also created there and then replicated to the backend system. The purchase order in SAP Enterprise Buyer is the leading purchase order and cannot be changed in the backend system. Goods receipts and invoices can be pre-entered in SAP Enterprise Buyer or entered directly in the backend system. With SAP Supplier Self-Services, you have partial supplier involvement for all your operational procurement scenarios. In these scenarios, you have supplier involvement for the purchase order and the purchase order response.
    ·        The standalone scenario
    The shopping cart and purchase order are processed directly in SAP Enterprise Buyer. You have no materials management functions in your ERP system and, instead, use those in SAP Enterprise Buyer for all procurement processes. The final invoice is sent to a backend accounting system. With SAP Supplier Self-Services, you have complete supplier involvement for all your operational procurement scenarios

  • Could not able to see POs in URL (SRM-SUS-MM) Scenario

    Hi All,
    We have created a PO in MM(R/3) and was transferred to SUS through XI.
    We could able to see the PO in TCode BBP_PD in SRM-SUS. But for some reason we are not able to see the PO from the URL.
    We have Purchaser (SRM_ADMIN) and Vendor (ARAMI-02) assigned the roles SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER and SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR respectively.
    My Org Structure is as follows:
    We have an Organization defined as company. Function CCode deifined.
    We have an POrg defined as POrg Function POrg Defined.
    We have an Pgrp defined as PGrp  Function PGrg Defined.
    We have defined vendor Org. haven't assigned anything in function tab.
    But defined some attributes needed for Vend Org.
    The PO is coming into transaction BBP_PD(SRM SUS) through XI from MM R/3 but is not available in URL either for Purchaser or for Vendor.
    Please tell me what needs to be done to resolve the above issue.
    Thanks in advance...
    Regards,
    Ravi..

    Hi
    <b>Yes sure.. Ask BASIS Team to help out and add the required role / profile to the required User, who is unable to see the POs.</b>
    <u>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes as well -></u>
    <b>Note 852516 Buyer administrator is not able to view supplier documents</b>
    Note 854910 Buyer administrator is able to change status for invoices
    Note 818385 Purchaser Admin has wrong authority to change invoices
    Note 1024327 Short dump when trying to open a vendor message
    Note 1032800 Error opening a vendor message in SUS 
    Note 1029356 Error opening a vendor message in EBP&SUS in one client
    Note 884905 No SUS alerts displayed in BP SuCo 2.0
    Note 743084 Missing status 'rejected' for Order in Menu
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • SRM-SUS for Service Entry Sheets - Classic Scenario

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    Our client wants to use SRM-SUS for the Service Entry Sheets (to being with and then later expand more in other SRM areas). The lead system will be R/3 system.
    We will be going with ECC 6.0 and SRM 5.0.
    Service Order will be created in R/3 and replicated into SRM (SAP have said this is new functionality in SRM 2007 and SAP will provide us with this functionality in SRM 5.0 as well)
    SAP are also recommending using MDM for hosting the catalogs for service entry sheets to enable vendors to selete their items during the confirmation / filling the service entry sheets. - they say this is mandatory
    SAP are also asking for XI for the data to be transferred from R/3 to SRM (and may be vice versa) - they say this is mandatory.
    Few questions:
    1) What kind of hardware size are we talking about to have SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal (PI)
    2) Are MDM and XI mandatory as said by SAP and if yes, in what scenarios. What is they way around
    3) How good is the functionality provided by SRM-SUS for Services? Is it as good as in R/3 (or even better)? We will be having complex Services in our scnearios.
    4) What can be a typical time to install SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal in the Dev environment to get moving onto the project?
    An early response shall be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Rahul

    few answers to your questions
    1) what is the release of SRM  you want to work with?
    2) services in SUS is not available as standard , and will be provided by SAP as consulting up on request.
    3) for hardware requirements , please refer to the master guide for the srm release you will be working on -->
    and also you can refer to the software component matrix in master guide --> to see if any component is mandatory..
    4) XI and MDM as far as i know is mandatory for SRM 6.0 and above , But in SRM 5.0 , XI is compulsory.
    5) so xi is mandatory in anyway in SUS as different systems are involved and therefore is required for routing the documents correctly.
    6) time for installation again depends on your supplier base , and your level of expertise.
    7) it is not always recommended to compare between two different systems , R/3 and SUS are different and so functionality will not be the same
    8) but as far as i know R/3 is stronger functioanlly..

Maybe you are looking for