SRM-SUS - Extended Classic - Purchase Order Response

Hi folks,
We are using SRM-SUS in an Extended Classic scenario in SRM 5.0.  When the Vendor creates a Purchase Order Response (POR) we want the Requisitioner of the Shopping Cart (not the Purchaser from the Purchase Order) to process the POR in EBP. 
We will add the transaction Process Purchase Reponse to the Requisitioner role.  We want to ensure that the Requisitioner can only see PORs related to Purchase Orders created from the Requisitioner's individual Shopping Carts.
Has anybody any suggestions and/or see obstacles in our way?
Cheers,
Pat

Hi Pat,
This is certainly not standard. I see the following challenges:
a. From the system perspective, your Shoppers will need to be assigned to purchasing group(s) in Org Structure to see the related PORs. That's very unusual, and consequences can be unpredictable.
b. From the internal controls / business process / security perspective, you may be creating some SOD (segregation of duties) issues.
IMHO, your business requirement needs to be re-visited. My two cents...
Cheers,
Serguei

Similar Messages

  • Extended Classic Purchase Order created from RFx Response having complex pricing conditions enabled

    Hello Colleagues,
    I am currently analysing the correct usage of the complex pricing conditions in the sourcing process and wanted to understand the usage of the complex pricing condtions ( 01CT , dis % , header disc% , location dependent conditions , etc. with or without scales , ) while creating a extended classic purchase order directly as follow on document from rfx response.
    How relevant is the price conditions 01CT. Consider a case if the price condition from rfx response to po is changed to price manual 01PB but the price is correctly copied when the po is initially created from rfx response.
    Is this is the correct system behaviour ?
    Kindly help to clarify the above points.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Rahul

    Hi
    <b> You can either of these BADIs to handlwe the scenario.</b>
    BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW Exit while creating a purchase order in the backend system
    BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK   OLD Exit while creating a PO in the backend system     
    BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI  ECS: PO Transfer to Logistics Backend                  
    BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI  Control Extended Classic Scenario  
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Extended classic purchase order tax calculation

    We are running extended classic on SRM 4.0.  We are connecting to our R/3 backend version 4.7.  The backend is utilizing Vertex for it's tax calculation.  We have confirgured SRM to use the backend for tax calculation. 
    We have a 5% state sales tax and a 1% local option sales tax at this location.  If we procure an item from a vendor residing in the same state then the local option sales tax applies (i.e. 6%).  If we procure an item from a vendor outside of the state then the local option tax does not apply (i.e. 5%).  I've tested this by creating PO's on the backend for both scenrios and the tax is calculated correctly.
    The issue we have is that the shopping cart is calculating the tax amount correctly, the replicated purchase order in R/3 also has the correct tax amount, however the purchase order residing in SRM does not have the correct amount, it is always calculating 6%, which is incorrect.
    My question is does anyone know the function module being called to calculate tax when the SRM PO is being created?  For the shopping cart I have verified that BBP_CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM46B is being used, is it not the same for the SRM PO?
    Best regards,
    Shawn O'Connor

    Hi Shawn,
    I do not know your SRM release... but did you already see OSS note 656398 and 888896 ?
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Yann

  • Material PO confirmation at supplier side (SUS) not taking place in SRM SUS Extended classic scenario

    We have configured extended classic scenario SRM with SUS, and all functions are working fine. However, at the time of PO confirmation of material item at the Supplier side (SUS), the material line item disappears when we click on the Create Confirmation button in SUS. The functionality is working fine for Service Items. The total value of PO is also displayed correctly in the Items overview section.
    Please provide some help in solving this issue.

    Hello,
    This is the correct behaviour of SUS - confirmations can only be created for service items which in turn create service entry sheets (Trx: ML81N in ECC).  And accepting the SES in ML81N will generate GR posting.
    For material items, you have to create ASN which will in turn create inbound delivery in ECC which you can post and will generate goods movement documents.
    So basically, for service items you create confirmation and for materials you create ASN.
    Regards,
    Prasanna

  • Extended Classic - Purchase Order Number Ranges

    We are using Extended Classic EBP. When a PO is created in SRM the PO replicated into R/3 does not have the same number.
    The backend PO document type is ECPO. We have assigned an internal and external number range to this document type.
    When an SRM PO is replicated to the backend, the backend PO number is taken from the internal number range for the document type. This internal number range does not include the number range of the SRM POs.
    We expect the SRM PO number to be pushed into R/3 and therefore the external number range of the R/3 document type should match the SRM PO number range.

    Hi
    No need to maintain the internal number range for the SRM PO document type ECPO in R3 (maintain the external number range code of SRM PO transaction type).
    As the PO is created in SRM, and the number range you maintained in SRM and R3 should be same, but in SRM it will be internal number range and in R3 it should be external number range. (number range code should be same in both the systems).
    Regards
    Reddy

  • SUS MM POR (Purchase Order Response) Workflow

    All,
    I am trying to configure MM-SUS(Plan Driven Procurement) scenario with SRM 5.5 and EEC 6.0. XI is set up. There is no SRM. It only ECC and SUS.
    Steps
    1-     PO is created in ECC, transmitted to SUS.
    2-     On SUS Supplier logs on and processes PO
    Problem-1: Supplier has to confirm twice before PO shows status Confirmed
    POR is transmitted on first attempt and PO acknowledgement is shown in po in ECC.
    Problem-2
    Where is the POR approval workflow,  purchaser needs to approve this POR, I am not able to find or trigger any workflow for this POR.
    Is this workflow in SUS or it is in ECC.
    I have looked at the starting conditions for BUS2232, no starting conditions.
    For BUS2209, there are starting conditions, is this the pertinent business object.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated and points will be awarded for relevant response.
    Hope to hear from you all using POR approval workflow in MM-SUS scenario.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello Kim
    Have you find the solution to this issue??
    I only need an approval step before transfer the POR to ECC
    Regards,
    Nacho

  • External number range for purchase order response?

    Hi all,
    is it possible to use an external number range when creating purchase order responses (BUS2209, PCO, POR) manually?
    If I transfer the POR from an external system like SUS via XML, can I use an external number range?
    I'm using SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) in standalone scenario with Business Connector 4.7 as XML interface.
    Any help is appreciated,
    Karsten

    Hi
    No need to maintian Internal number range.. Yes you need to use an external number range
    Only the PO, RQ & RS are sync and therefore must correspond with the R/3 number ranges.
    The rest, Shop Cart (SC), Local PO (EBP), Confirmation, Invoice, Bid Inv and Bid, aren't synced and can be assigned to any number range. (FYI- using ECS)
    Re: Extended Classic - Purchase Order Number Ranges
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/87/7cc73cee4fb55be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6d/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Re: Number range config
    Re: config for Number Ranges ? :-(
    Re: PO Creation with external PO number
    Purchase Order Response BUS2232
    PO number range Issue
    Re: Defining the number range
    Regards
    - Atul

  • SRM-SUS Purchase Order Response always "In Status"

    Hi Gurus,
    When a buyer confirms a PO response without any change, the system generates a new PO response with status "In process". And so, when the buyer views the new PO response, the "Confirm Response" and "Reject Response" buttons are still active and the buyer can still confirm the response. When the buyer confirms the new PO response, the system will again generate a new PO response with status "In process".
    We are on SRM 7.0 SP05. We did not activate the following workflows:
    WS14500001  Auto Transfer of PCO
    WS14500019 Transfer PCO Data to PO
    Would really appreciate any help.
    Regards,
    Kezia

    Hi
    XI Seems to be good as the XML message is getting processed in SRM and is creating a POR Document. Here are the steps for configuring POR:
    1. Define NUmber Ranges
    2. Activate Event Linkages and Start Conditions for WS14500001.(this is predelivered in standard system)
    3. Configurations for Tolerances for qty and date...
    Did you process the POR from PO?
    You need to go to Process Purchase Order Response , searched for PORs and then take action on the PORs in pending statuses.....
    POR functionality is pretty much straightforward feature which works smoothly.....If you are not able to sort it out using this forum, write detaisl to SAP, they can look into your system
    Regards
    Virender Singh

  • EBP-SUS - Purchase Order Response (POR) with attachments

    Hi,
       I am working on EBP-SUS scenario with EBP in Extended classic scenario.
       I have couple of questions regarding Purchase Order Response in SUS with attachments. I appreciate your response to these questions.
      1. From SUS, when the Supplier responds to a PO with attachment, does the attachment get copied over to SRM PO?
      2. If so, in case of extended classic scenario, does the attachment get sent to MM?
    Thanks,
    Surendra

    Khan,
      Thanks for your reply.
      So, in case of EBP-SUS scenario, if the supplier sends attachment, the attachment gets copied over to PO when the POResponse is copied over? I tried this scenario and the attachment is appearing on PO Response record. However, does not seem to get copied over to PO when the "Copy" button was pressed. Am I missing any configuration?
    Thanks,
    Surendra

  • Purchase Order Response in Classic Scenario

    Hi Experts,
    Implementation Scenario- CLASSIC
    SRM Server - 5.0
    Question-
    1) Within Classic Scenario, is it possible for to create Purchase Order Response in SRM for a PO which is already created in backend? This PO is generated by a shopping cart in SRM.
    Best Regards,
    Amit

    Hi Amit,
    You can create POR for a PO which is already created in backend, no matter if its created with reference to SC in SRM. This POR would be done by the supplier in SUS scenario.
    It possible in both, classic and ECS scenario's.
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • SRM 7.0 Purchase Order Response always in status "In process" after confirm

    Hello experts,
    this problem is similar to the thread [SRM-SUS Purchase Order Response always "In Status"; which has been not finally responded.
    My problem exists in an environment without SUS.
    When a buyer confirms a PO response (POR) without any change, the system generates a new PO response with status "In process".  This new POR has also to be confirmed or rejected but the system generates again a new PO response with status "In process".
    So we have a very nice loop for the purchaser without escape!
    We are on SRM 7.0 SP07. The other thread mentioned that SAP will create some OSS notes, but I found nothing about this problem.
    Any ideas?
    Regards
    Joe

    Hi Gurus.
    I want to share my experience with this case.
    We have the same scenario, Confirm PO, the result is PO confirmed, but we receive a response from ECC and this Confirmed PO changes its status to "In Process" / "En Tratamiento".
    The new relevant information is that we added 2 new fields to the item PO, these fields are filled ok and sent to ECC.
    In a first time these new fields were lost due to the response from ECC. To avoid this situation I implemented the BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI for BUS2230, and method BBP_SUSPO_CHANGE to copy from the BBP_PDISC (Object BUS2230) rows the values to the new rows in the same table BBP_PDISC (Object BUS2201).
    With this change the new documents are confirmed directly and not changed to "In Process"/ "En tratamiento".
    That was my experience, now I have a question...
    In the correct business process for SAP SRM SUS  when you confirm full a PO...
    * this will be blocked or no?
    * Can be modified the confirmed items?
    * This depends of customizing?

  • Process button in purchase order response SUS not present

    Hi all.
    We have SRM 7 and ECC 6.4. Scenario MM-SUS Purchase Order Response.
    We can transfer purchase orders from MM to SUS. Purchase Order SUS are generate correctly In SUS system.
    However. When a Vendor user enters in the SUS system  to create the POR, we can not create it  because the Process button is not present.
    The user was create by process of Creating Buyer Data (BBP_SUS_BP_ADM) and  rols SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER and SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR in trx SU01
    I appreciate a tip to solve this issue.
    Regards
    Raul.

    Hi,
    You can do what Sam has suggested in vendor master too so that everytime a PO for that vendor is issued, you do not have to manually maintain these settings in the PO.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • SRM Purchase Order Response in SRM 7.0

    In SRM 7.0 is there a transaction where a purchase order response to can be entered manually for purchase order or loaded from a spreadsheet?  Or does a purchase order response always require XI?
    Regards,
    -Paul Trauth

    Hi Paul,
    We have to use the SRM portal for all kind of purchase order processing like creation, updation etc,. Can you be more precise in your question, so then we can answer from our side.
    Thanks,
    Nastera

  • Purchase Order Response in SRM from R/3 through XI

    Hello friends,
    While sending Purchase Order Response from R/3 to SRm through XI Iam getting this error in SXMB_MONI of XI and also in SRM:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!-- Response
    -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
    <SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
    <SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code>
    <SAP:P1 />
    <SAP:P2 />
    <SAP:P3 />
    <SAP:P4 />
    <SAP:AdditionalText><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><nr1:StandardMessageFault xmlns:nr1="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global"><standard><faultText>An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_PD:069 -Product data could not be intepreted E:BS:013 -System status INCM is active (Purchase Order Response 1000000037) Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</faultText></standard></nr1:StandardMessageFault></SAP:AdditionalText>
    <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage>
    <SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception</SAP:Stack>
    <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
    </SAP:Error>
    can anyone please help me out in this...........
    Thanks in Advance...

    Dear Friends,
    I am SAP MM Certified Consultant & did my training for MM Module from Siemens ( Sapient College )& paid 2.5 lac for that and Since then I am working as a SAP MM consultant in an MNC since past 2 years, done 2 implementations  and had a functional experience of 4  years in purchasing .
    Had work for MNC’s only & having good expertise in Domain area .Total Experience 5 years out of that 2 years SAP MM experience .
    Dear all can you tell me what should i do so as to make a successful career in SRM.? How long should i stay in MM and what should I learn besides MM.I have already started working on SRM .
    I wish to do SRM training again from Siemens  but this point of time , I don’t have enough money to do SRM training from Siemens . Could anyone suggest , where I can learn SRM in Bangalore  & get trained in this New thing and do i need some programming knowledge in it.
    Could anybody send me some SRM documentation on my mail id [email protected]
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Savita Munshi

  • Purchase order response(POR) in SRM

    Hello SRM Experts,
    We would like to implement Purchase order response(POR) functionality of SRM 5.0. The client requirement is to set POR flag at PO item level, expect POR from the vendor and no GR/IV should be allowed either in SRM or ECC until POR is provided by the vendor.
    We have the following questions.
    1. If POR flag is set, does it stop GR/IV either in SRM or ECC?
    2. When POR is posted in SRM does POR flag is re-set in SRM?
    3. When POR is created in SRM, does it create any follow-on docs in ECC.
    Looking forward to hear from you all soon.
    Regards,
    Sasikala

    Hi Sasikala.
    Referring to your questions:
    PO Response is just an acknowledgement document by the vendor to state that he is in agreement with the conditions set in the Purchase Order.
    1) No GR/IV will not be stopped in SRM or ECC. If the client wants it that ways then I believe custom code needs to be written.
    2) No...reason being you can create as many PO Responses as want for a given PO...the latest will be active and all the responses created before that are obsolete.
    3) No follow on documents are created in ECC while creation of PO Response as after the PO Response changes are accepted in PO, only then the PO is replicated to ECC again with change version.
    Regards,
    Abhilash

Maybe you are looking for