SRM7.0 Application controlled workflow need Allow/Disallow to edit fields f

Dear All,
     We using SRM7.0 Application controlled workflow,Now we need Allow/Disallow to edit fields for approver,how to do it,About Process controlled workflow,we can according to the notes 1277921 do it,But Application controlled workflow,I didn't find any notes,Can you help it.

Hi,
  Here is the SAP help for your reference. Please let us know if you need more information..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/29/b092ecfcb24b14b7baa225ba13955b/frameset.htm
Saravanan

Similar Messages

  • Side Effects of switching from Application Controlled Workflow to Process

    We have switched our development environmnet from application controlled workflow to process controlled workflow.  We noticed that when we try to pull up old shopping carts that are awaiting approval we get dumps.
    Is this a known issue when converting from application controlled workflow to processing controlled workflow?
    Regards,
    -Paul

    Hi,
    What kind of dump did you get?
    My understanding is it should work if SC is created in SRM 7.0 with AC workflow.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Fundamental Process Controlled Workflow Questions

    I have the following basic questions when it comes to process controlled workflows:
    1. Everyone generalizes over this question, but what is the specific difference between 40007953 (SC approval 1) and 40007954 (SC approval 2). Under what circumstance would I choose one over the other?
    2. What are all the functions you are allowed to edit during approval, when you're in Approval completion? I know Inquire is one of the functions. It seems like you can't add/delete items.
    I'm aware of Note 1277921 - Allow/Disallow to edit fields for approver/reviewer

    Hi,
       If you are using the level type as "Approval with Completion" then you must be used '40007952'. if you are using only "Approval" then you must be used '40007953'.
       This is how system works when you choose "Approval with Completion" Approver can see edit button and also change the SC.. keep in mind WF will not restart when the approver change the SC in this process level.
       If you choose only "Approval" then you can't make the fields or events visible until you follow the instruction in the OSS notes..
    1277921 - Allow/Disallow to edit fields for approver/reviewer
    Saravanan

  • Process Controlled Workflows VS Applicaiton Enabled Workflows-What to chose

    G'Day All,
    We are upgrading from SRM5.0 to SRM7.0
    There are these bespoke shopping cart approval workflows developed previously. I have to do some sort of assessment to include
    1) Why would we go for PCWs instead of just migrating the old ones in SRM 7.0 as business is pretty happy with the functionality they have got and are not interested in revising the workflow processes. Answer :  Application enabled workflows are in maintainence mode so newer functionality would be delivered using PCWs.( is there any other justification ? )
    2) Would we be able to map the existing workflow process to PCWs, here i need some pointers. I understand the PCWs are based on BRF though i don't know much about BRF( updating myself ). The key question i have is, whatever is there in bespoke workflow templates would i be able to  replicate that using this i.e. a different technology. Since my exposure to either PCWs or BRF is not great so as a general rule i am asking, is it possible or are there any sort of technical limitations on what you can and what you can't do using PCWs which you could design using a normal workflow template?
    I am sure this would be a common analysis which many of you might have done or are doing if you are involved in an upgrade.
    An Interesting Fact : There is no documentation available on existing SRM 5.0 workflows as what differently they have done to standard. The only thing i know at this stage is they have a bespoke level 1 template which call different standard templates for n level approval process. The apporval process( agent determination ) is based purely on custom logic. I am not that worried about the agent determination as i know i could get that as rule evaluation in BRF. The crux for me is to understand how BRFcontrols or connects to workflow templates in this particular case and what permutation conbinations are possible.
    So, i want to have a discussion on this and if possible some insight on all this new PCWs.
    Hope to see some valuable comments.
    Regards
    Praveen

    Hi everyone:
    My question is the following.
    We will implement SRM 7.01 with Process Controlled Workflow.
    However in the manual is the following note:
    Note: Even if you decide to use Process-Controlled Workflow in general,
    there are a few workflows still on the old technology:
    WS10400022 . Contract Alert Workflow
    WS10000192 - Approval Workflow for Internal Users
    WS10000209 - Approval workflow for new bidder/supplier     
    WS10000093/WS10000100 -Procurement Card Approval
    Probably We will required some of this.
    My question is if we are planning to configure process and application the correct strategy will be:
    1.     Start the configuration with the application controlled workflow and then
    2.     Follow with the change of the configuration application to process controlled workflow
    3.     And configure the workflowu2019s in process.
    u2022     Is there any problem when if we change the check  application to process?  Are there any chance that we loss the configuration?
    u2022     Is there any problem in the functionality that both kinds of workflow (application-process) work at the same time?
    u2022     If is possible to make change or maintenance of the application workflow?
    Thanksu2019 a lot for all the help
    Best Regards

  • Dump on screen when configuring Process controlled workflow

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing 1 problem in SAP SRM 7 ehp1.  I am configuring Process controlled workflow. Previous workflow settings was Application controlled workflow as its been upgraded from SRM 5. If i run a RFX (BUS2200) cycle in application controlled workflow environment, it works flawlessly.
    But when i change my workflow framework to process controlled workflow for all Business Objects. I face a dump when I am creating an RFX. The dump on the portal is:
    http://dl3803.ltisap.com:8040/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm_oif
    DATREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
    No access possible via the 'NULL' data reference
    Method: PARTICIPATING_IN_ACTIVE_WF of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_DYN_MDA_WF_ADJ=CP
    Method: EDIT_DURING_WORKFLOW of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_DYN_MDA_WF_ADJ=CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONF_BO~GET_BO_HDR_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_CONF_PROV=CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONSUMER~GET_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_BO_RFQ====CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONSUMER~GET_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_BO_RFQ_ADVCP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONSUMER~GET_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_HANDLER===CP
    Method: UPDATE_ACTIONS of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_MAP_IDENT====CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_MAPPER~REFRESH of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_MAP_IDENT====CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_MAPPER~REFRESH of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_IDEN_MAP_RFQ=CP
    Method: OVERRIDE_LEAVE_INIT_SCREEN of program /SAPSRM/CL_FPM_OVRIDE_OIF=====CP
    & when i check in st22. I get the dump as:
    Category               ABAP Programming Error
    Runtime Errors         DATREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
    ABAP Program           /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_DYN_MDA_WF_ADJ=CP
    Application Component  SRM-EBP-PD
    Date and Time          17.12.2011 15:46:56
    and get dump at:
      1 method PARTICIPATING_IN_ACTIVE_WF.
      2   " this method returns ABAP_TRUE if the logon user has an active work item,
      3   " i.e. he participates in an active approval workflow process.
      4
      5   DATA lv_curr_workitem_id    TYPE /sapsrm/wf_workitem_id.
      6   DATA lr_process_info        TYPE ref to /SAPSRM/S_PDO_WF_PROCESS_INFO.
      7
      8   " the default:
      9   rv_participates_in_active_wf = abap_false.
    10
    11   " The scenario is not valid for application-controlled workflow:
    12   " Any agents who may edit the document (approver and requester)
    13   " enter "Edit" mode right-away. No special handling possible.
    14   lr_process_info = io_apf_md_context->get_process_info_ref( ).
    >>>   IF lr_process_info->wf_version NE /sapsrm/if_wf_process_c=>GC_APF_VERSION_0200.
    16     return.
    17   endif.
    18
    19   " check if a valid workitem exists
    20   lv_curr_workitem_id = io_apf_md_context->get_workitem_id( ).
    21   IF lv_curr_workitem_id IS INITIAL.
    22     RETURN.
    23   ENDIF.
    the only configuration I change in the system is I changed the workflow framework to process controlled workflow.
    Kindly help.
    Thanks
    Anand

    Hello Anand,
    As per standard SAP recommendations the application-controlled workflow framework is only intended to be used if you are upgrading from SAP SRM 5.0 or earlier and you need to continue using your existing work-flows.
    The default workflow framework setting is the process-controlled workflow from SRM 6.0 on-wards and the user will be provided a option to switch to the application-controlled workflow framework.  The option to switch to process-controlled workflows is available only after you have once switched to application-controlled work flows but there will be a big caution that " If you switch from the application-controlled workflow framework to the process-controlled workflow framework; once a process-controlled workflow has been run, it is not supported that you switch back to application-controlled work-flows".
    As per the details given i got a feel that we have tried executing the scenario by switching between application and process controlled workflow and hence the system have become inconsistent and its dumping.
    I suggest you to raise a OSS ticket to SAP to resolve the issue.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • Approval preview process controlled workflow

    Hi,
    We are using process controlled workflow (N step) for the shopping cart workflows.
    While sending the reminder mails to the approvers, we would like to include the approval preview in the email.
    In application controlled workflows we could use FM BBP_WFL_DIN_APPR_CONTAINER_GET to get the approval preview details.
    Is there a similar function module to pick the approvers/approval status/step name etc for the process controlled workflows so that we can simulate the approval preview?
    Thanks
    BR
    Swetha

    Use class /SAPSRM/CL_WF_APV_FACADE. This is used by standard SAP WF Analysis.
    Methods - RETRIEVE_PROCESS_HISTORY, GET_CURRENT_PROCESS_STATE, CREATE_PROCESS_FORECAST.
    To analyze more, check the program /SAPSRM/WF_CFG_ANALYSIS_002. Check lines 209...216 (These Lines pull Previous Approved Steps, Current Process Step & Gets the approval forecast). However the REJECTED Items (Accept Decision) work little different (which is not captured by this report).
    To Identify the current approval process awaiting decision by the requester of the cart, use method GET_CURRENT_PROCESS_STATE, return parameter structure /SAPSRM/S_WF_PROCESS-PROCESS_LEVEL_LIST-DECISIONSET_LIST-ITEM_STATUS_LIST gets you the current status of the item (ACCEPTED, REJECTED, OPEN, INQUIRED). If ITEM_STATUS_LIST-ITEM_STATUS EQ 'REJECTED', then the WF is waiting for acceptance/resubmission from the requester.
    To your specific need, pass DOCUMENT_GUID to the class /SAPSRM/CL_WF_APV_FACADE=>GET_CURRENT_PROCESS_STATE get the return parameter /SAPSRM/S_WF_PROCESS. It will give you PROCESS_LEVEL_LIST. Then loop through DECISIONSET_LIST. It contains Table Types of AGENTS_LIST, ITEM_STATUS_LIST, WORKITEM_LIST. At /SAPSRM/S_WF_PROCESS level, you can get all the details of the current process level details
    Thanks,
    SC

  • Complexity of using N-step BADI in SRM 7using Process controlled Workflow.

    Hi,
    Just as a big thought,
    I have a Shopping Cart requirement, Here i am asked to develop a Custom workflow for SRM 7.0.
    And the client is looking for us to use Process Control Workflows i.e(BRF integrated one).
    I need to understand the complexity of using a N-step BADI.
    How would be the complexity level if I use a N step BADI( ie Multiple approval levels on Line Item Based).
    Kindly tell me the complexity of Using it and if any one has come across some requirement like this, then explain me that how did you face the situation.
    Expecting an Earliest Response.
    Thanks,
    Shanky

    Hi,
      Is your project SRM 7.0 implementation project then you have to go for Process Controlled Workflow and if your project is upgrade then you can still go with Application Controlled Workflow but down line this has to switch to Process Controlled Workflow.
    Best Regards,
    Saravanan

  • Acceptance by Requestor - Process control workflow

    Hi All,
    I have followed the below thread and configured the "Acceptance by contact person" BRF for status REJECTED. Now when my shopping cart is rejected , i still see the  shopping cart as awaiting approval.This is sometihng strange as i expected soomething like "In Your Inbox".  In the approval preview i can see it is awaiting acceptance from me. however i am confused as there is no acceptance button in the detail of the SC.
    do i need to go to edit mode? if i go to edit mode the SC workflow will start from the beginning as it behaves similarly  when we modify shopping cart awaiting approval .however acceptance would have deleted the shopping cart  item that were rejected and  workflow would have continued from that step onward.
    please do let me know what i am experiencing is standard or thereis something wrong ??
    Re: Enable work item to Requester at process End Check box
    Cheers
    iftekhar Alam
    Edited by: Iftekhar Alam on Jul 5, 2010 1:51 PM
    Also i have noticed that for completion step the rejection of SC i do not get the edit option . its only availbale for the approval type rejection step.

    Hi Siobhan,
    I am delighted to get OSS Notes from you. I have got reply in sdn faster than the oss message i raised for the same
    However small calrification required.
    1430274 Incorrect status display in POWL for par...
    This note talks about application controlled workflow , we are using process controlled workflow. do you suggest implementing this??
    1412458    Status "In your inbox" (2)...
    i am going to implement this and test ,and would update after that.
    1399239 New button "Show my Tasks" for document in a...
    i am going to hold the implementation of this note , coz there is chance we might go for support pack upgrade and that would resolve and bring in additional functionaliy.
    Cheers
    Iftekhar Alam

  • Team SC functionality workswith Aplication Controlled workflow in SRM 7.0

    Hello All,
    We are now going to upgrade from SRM 5.0 to SRM 7.0. I saw from SAP help documentations says "Team purchasing is not available with the application-controlled workflow framework". Further I saw few of the SDN posting says it can work for application controlled workflow also. And I am also have a gut feel that it should work.
    Can you please confirm. and will appreciate for your quick response.
    Points will be rewared.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ram

    Hello Ramesh,
    I would believe what SAP is saying, they normally don't lie on SAP help or SRM210 ;-). I do know there is a note available that has downported the teampurchasing functionallity for SRM 5.0 system. I don't know whether that solution could be applied to SRM 7.0 systems aswell, thus enabling team purchasing functionallity for application controlled workflow in SRM 7.
    Note: 1152797 (it only applies to SRM_SERVER 5.5)
    Since SRM 7.0 is set-up with application controlled workflow as standard you could give it a try and see whether team purchasing functionality is available. One thing you do need to expect is that Team Purchasing related things wont be available in defining your application-controlled WF (this might give problems?). In addition you might want to give upgrade/migrating your SC BUS2121 workflow to process controlled workflow the highest WF-upgrade priority. SRM 7 has the ability to change AC/PC WF per Business Object (Note: You can not change back to AC once PC has been activated).
    Kind regards,
    Tim
    Edited by: T. Schuffelen on Apr 14, 2010 5:45 PM
    Edited by: T. Schuffelen on Apr 14, 2010 5:50 PM

  • Process controlled workflow - SC process schema evaluation

    Hi experts,
    at the moment I'm using the n-step item level approval in SRM 5.0.
    We are implementing SRM 7.0. With the new process controlled workflow I'm not sure how to
    implement the logic of our "old" system.
    Depending on category and item value the SC item has to be approved by 0 - 7 users.
    I've created an event which finds a Z-process schema via FM.
    In the FM I've tried to change the process schema (debugger) for one SC item.
    But the schema has been changed for all items.
    Is it possible to use different process schemas for items?
    When yes how can I set the schema e.g.
    item 10 schema1
    item 20 schema1
    item 30 schema2
    item 40 schema1
    Thanks in advance for your inputs!
    Regards
    Stefan

    Hi,
    Schema Evaluation is document header level.
    There are 2 ways for implementation.
    1. Schema Evaluation returns Schema name. For example, 1 step approval, ... 7 step approval
    2. 1 Fixed Schema and 7 level evaluations. 1 Schema has 7 approval steps and each evaluation returns true or false.
    You have to implement GET_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP method of Agent BADI to exclude/include items.
    BTW. If you set workflow framework as Application-Controlled Workflow, your old workflow logic works without any change.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • How to trigger standard task manually in Process controlled workflow?

    Hi All,
    I would like to trigger a task mannually in BRF, process controlled workflow. My requirement is to send an approval notification to the approvers at the current approval level, at any instance by the requestor of the shopping cart. In that case, will it be possible to trigger the standard task 40007953 (SRM Shopping Cart Approval (1)) with the workitem of Shopping cart under consideration?
    I have tried searching for the same in SDN and other forums but most of the information was regarding application controlled workflows. None of those function modules seems to be working in PCW.
    Any pointers on how to trigger a standard task (using FM or code) in BRF(process controlled workflow) environment is also highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    S.H@ri

    Hi,
    Use this FM [SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/bb9100f8-0c01-0010-ac8e-e017351f3fc1].
    Regards,
    Surjith

  • SRM Process Controlled Workflow - Re-start using FM BBP_PD_SC_UPDATE

    Hi All,
    We are upgrading from SRM4.0 to SRM7.0 SP07 in classic scenario. We switched to Process Controlled Workflow.
    We have a CUSTOM application where the requisition items are entered and a Shopping Cart is created in SRM through Function Module BBP_PD_SC_CREATE. When the Shopping Cart is created in SRM , the Process Controlled Worflow is triggered successfully.
    In the custom application , we allow users to do changes to the requisition that are awaiting approval.The changes are updated in SRM Shopping Cart through function module BBP_PD_SC_UPDATE. It is noticed that the workflow process levels are not re-started after the shopping cart is updated through FM BBP_PD_SC_UPDATE.
    However , the process levels are re-started when the change is directly done to the Shopping Cart in SRM POWL. We want the process levels to be re-started even when the changes are done through BBP_PD_SC_UPDATE. The users are used do changes to the requisition through the custom application. We also noticed that system does not go through BAdI /SAPSRM/BD_WF_PROCESS_RESTART when changes are done to the SC through BBP_PD_SC_UPDATE.
    Is there any way that we can trigger process level re-start when SC is changed through FM BBP_PD_SC_UPDATE
    Thanks
    Sukumar

    HI ,
           This is not the correct way of updating the SC. please check the below process...
           first you try to get the SC document in Edit mode and this can be done only SY-UNAME should requester of the SC or( user who are changing the SC should be in the Org structure ).  ( This point why i mentioned is you mentioned that your editing through custom application ). 
      note : use try and endtry and catch the exception when u get the SC document in Edit mode.
      DATA: lo_pdo_sc             TYPE REF TO /sapsrm/cl_pdo_bo_sc_adv.
          "Instance SC PDO Layer
          lo_pdo_sc ?= /sapsrm/cl_pdo_factory_sc_adv=>get_instance( iv_header_guid   = p_guid "ps_shopping_cart-guid
                                                                    iv_mode          = /sapsrm/if_pdo_constants_gen_c=>gc_mode_edit ).
       now you do what ever changes to the document. I mentioned points below.
            "Get Item Details
          lo_pdo_sc->/sapsrm/if_pdo_bo_sc~get_item_detail
    do changes to the items of the SC.
           "Update SC Items
          lo_pdo_sc->/sapsrm/if_pdo_bo_sc~update_items
           "Submit Update
          lo_pdo_sc->/sapsrm/if_pdo_base~submit_update
           "Save SC
          lo_pdo_sc->/sapsrm/if_pdo_base~save    
          or  order  the SC again.
          COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
    regards,
    Devi

  • SRM 7.0 Process Controlled Workflow-Level Type in Process level config

    Hello Experts,
    In SRM 7.0 for Process controlled workflow,for Level Type in Process Level configuration we have 3 different options
    1) Approval with Completion
    2) Approval
    3) Automatic(System User)
    Can you plz explain what is the difference between these 3 diffrent potion for Level Type in Process Level configuration.
    Your help will be highly appreciated,
    Thanks & Regards,
    RKS

    1. Approval with completion : This allows approvers to make any changes to document while approving. Generally you define this type for buyer in SC approval.
    2. Approval :  above minus change
    3. Automatic (system approval) : If no process level is determined, you need to set up a process level with automatic approval to approve the document by system.

  • Tips for procesess controlled workflow

    Hi everyone,
    We need your help. We are in SRM 7. We have to create a WF for SC. The approver of the item depend of the account assignment category (AAC). For example, we have a SC with 2 items. The first item has the AAC "Cost center" and the second has the AAC "Asset". In this case, the item 1 has to be approved by approver 1 and the item 2 has to be approved by approver 2.
    What do you recomend to do this?
    Thanks,
    Ivá

    Hi,
    Agent BADI is a solution.
    /SAPSRM/BD_WF_SC_RR_PGRP is the good exsample.
    Define Agents
    Use
    This Business Add-In (BAdI) is used in the SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SAP SRM) Workflow component (SRM_EBP_WFL).
    You can use this Business Add-In to assign SAP SRM purchasing documents (or separate parts of these documents) to agent groups for approval.
    1. Use method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP to assign the document items to a specific agent group. This assignment can be made by specifying the area of activity of that group. The area can be a technical key identifying the group itself or can also identify a master data range (for example, a cost centre range or an organizational branch) for which the agent group is responsible. When you return an initial item ID and specify a single area, you indicate that all document items should be assigned to a single agent group for approval.
    2. Use method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID to return all members of each individual agent group.
    3. Optional: Use the following methods in cases where you need an additional parameter for evaluating the assignment of the different agent groups:
    a) Use method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_RESP_RESOLVER_PARAMETER_F4 to provide an input help for your additional parameter.
    b) Use method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~CHECK_RESP_RESOLVER_PARAMETER to check the user's input for your additional parameter.
    4. Optional: Use method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVERGET_FALLBACK_AGENTS to specify the fallback agents that are used when method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVERGET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID does not return any results, that is, when the system cannot determine a responsible agent.
    Note:
    Fallback agents can approve or reject the items of a document or they can forward the work item to another processor.
    Requirements
    You have defined filter values in Customizing for SAP SRM under SRM Server ->  Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Business Workflow -> Process-Controlled Workflow -> Business Process Configuration -> Define Filter Values for BAdI 'Define Agents'.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • ZMM 2.5 Policy Suite, Application Control, Whitelisting

    Reference: Novell Documentation: ZENworks Mobile Management - Table of Contents
    The ZMM manuals are not quite clear what they mean by "Whitelisting" under the Policy Suite, Application Control sections. I'm assuming ZMM application "whitelisting" means that only listed apps can run or at least only listed apps can be installed and run. Is assumption correct? Has anyone done this successfully on Android devices with the ZMM agent an enrolled Touchdown? If so, could you provide details on how it was done? Ideally we'd like to take an inventory list of a working device set of applications, add them to the whitelist, and force the user to come to the administrator for new applications, regardless of their google play/alternative market access.
    Thoughts?
    Kevin

    Originally Posted by nop1983
    salisburyk wrote:
    >
    > Reference:
    > 'SureLock for Android | Kiosk Mode Lockdown for Tablets, Smartphones &
    > Rugged Devices' (SureLock for Android | Kiosk Mode Lockdown for Tablets, Smartphones & Rugged Devices)
    >
    > Bryce,
    >
    > Another very interesting product is SureLock for Android - we are
    > testing it to see how it compliments Novell ZMM...
    >
    > Kevin
    This looks like a Endpoint security product for Android, right?
    Niels
    Hi Niels,
    Did you happen see the link? No, the SureLock product allows Application Control/Application whitelisting right on the android device with full administrator control. We wrongly thought ZMM could whitelist Android apps (shame on us - we neglected to test that before we purchased. Lessons learned - give yourself time to test everything in your requirements list prior to purchase). Our initial testing of SureLock went very smoothly, it does not interfere with the ZMM agent or Touchdown. The users see only what you want them to see - apparently even without root access on the android device. We are now using it in conjunction with ZMM on our Mobile devices. There are others that offer similar functionality in conjunction with ZMM - take a look at Clutch Mobile App Protector Pro that is coming soon for iOS as well ( https://www.clutchmobile.com/products/appprotector ). We do not have iOS, so SureLock is fine for our needs in conjunction with ZMM...
    Kevin

Maybe you are looking for

  • 16 phones in 4.5 years!

    The following is my tale, based on email written to Verizon ahead of a small claims case I will soon be filing against Verizon, of how I came to be known as “14-phone guy”: In 4.5 years, Verizon has sent me 16 warranty replacement phones – this does

  • Trouble downloading itunes 11.1 or higher

    I am trying to update my iphone and my music on it. So when I plugged in my phone to my computer itunes came up and said "iphone" cannot be used because it requires itunes 11.1 or higher. ok so i went to the website and tried to download this version

  • Plese a have this message warning

    i have this message "A problem with the cooling system has been detected. Please turn off the computer immediately, and return it for service" my pc is a toshiba  satellite C660D - 1D3

  • Batch command help ?

    Hi Guys I have this batch file called via ant build script.The batch file has 10 different function .Now i have this requirement to break it into smaller parts. Example the functionality should now be broken into three parts 1)employee data processin

  • My MacBook Pro os 10.6.8 find command doesnt work

    My MacBook Pro os 10.6.8 find command doesnt work.  Someone mentioned indexing the hard drive but I dont know how.  Any help would be appreciated