SRP547W external ping

Am I missing something here. I have installed a couple of SRP547W's and can't ping the external side of the ADSL interface.
Is there an option to turn on "respond to ping" and also are you able to forward to a internal IP?

Hi Mark, yes, it is a very obscure and silly wording
It is on the firewall filter -> Filter anonymous internet requests
For port forwarding you need to go to
Network Setup > NAT > Port Forwarding
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts

Similar Messages

MacBook Air loses connection to internet but not LAN

Hi, I am using a MacBook Air 11" (mid-2012) running OS X Mavericks (10.9.3). I'm connecting to my home LAN via WiFi connection to a TP-Link 300M Wireless router that is setup as a switch (per instructions here http://www.tp-link.com/en/article/?faqid=417), which in turn is connected via wire (ethernet-over-power) to a Technicolor cable modem/router provided by my ISP (UPC in the Netherlands; I can look up the model number of the router if needed, but it's two floors down right now and doesn't strike me that this is the cause of the problem).
I have a problem that my MacBook Air intermittently loses connectivity to the internet for extended periods (minutes) even though (a) the MacBook Air maintains full connectivity to my LAN at the same time through WiFi and (b) other computers connected to the cable modem/router maintain their connection to the internet while my MacBook Air has lost its connection.
My test to see where the breakdown is occurring is to have four terminal windows up and running ping processes:
1) ping to 192.168.0.1 (my router) - this always stays live, with essentially no lost packets
2) ping to an external address (I'm using 74.125.136.94, a google.nl address) - this is my main test for access to the internet and where I see ping failures (I'm also testing with pings to other sites when the problem is occurring to ensure it's not something on the remote end).
3) ping to 192.168.0.13, which is a Synology NAS attached via ethernet cable to my main cable modem/router - this always stays live, with essentially no lost packets.
4) a login to the Synology NAS, where I am also running a continual ping to 74.125.136.94, and this external ping does NOT fail when the one from my MacBook Air does, it stays live with essentially no lost packets.
The problem will usually correct itself after 1-3 minutes (though the time is not consistent), and also gets corrected if I turn the MacBook Air's WiFi off and on again.
Any suggestions for what I can do to stop this problem?
Thanks
John

> 1. If the MBA is connected to the
> a. the Technicolor SSIDs, is the behavior the same (poziom-k testing shows that a second AP causes problems).
No. If connected to WiFI served by Technicolor, the problem does not occur (even if the other AP is connected to the network).
> b. can the Technicolor be replaced easily by an Airport Express/Extreme, to repeat this test?
Unfortunately, Technicolor in router mode is required by my ISP.
> 2. Instead of WiFi, if the MBA is cabled to the secondary AP, is the behavior the same?
Yes.
> 3. Has Wireless RF interference been ruled out for dropped connections?
Yes. A Windows machine and several iOS mobile devices work flawlesly for me.
> 4. If the MBA has a wired connection to the Technicolor, does the problem still exist?
No. The problem occurs only if connected through additional AP.
> 5. Have packets been captured at each interesting point in the topology to see where are packets drops occurring? netstat -s is probably worth looking at > such points. Wireshark (or similar tools) can help.
Not yet. I will not have a chance to do it for the next few days though :/

Cannot Remote Desktop!!

I did everything right. I have a DSL subscription with a static IP address assigned by my ISP. My ADSL modem is Linksys ADSL2MUE, and the router is WRT54GS v4 using PPoE. My 2 wirelessly connected PCs are using static IP addresses, and they are happily connected to the internet. The port forwarding (for port # 3389) is properly enabled through the Applications and Gaming section on the router's web-interface for only one of the PCs' IP addresses. I only use the native Windows XP firewall, and had excepted the RDP from the blocked programs/ports.
When I externally ping that ISP-assigned static IP address I continuously get timed out, and I could never get it to create an external peacefully Remote Desktop however, I managed to Remote Desktop internally, from one of the PCs to the other.
Please help figure out what I'm missing.
Thanks
Message Edited by Ehab on 03-04-200711:56 AM

open ports 65301, 22, 5631 and 5632
Love is just a word".... It has no emotions...only thoughts, imaginations.

Help! invoke dos command!!

i want to implement a notepad in java language, it can invoke a dos command(ping.exe) to some IP addresses stored in a text file, and store the ping results into a text file, how can i invoke a dos command and store the execute results into a text file???

If you want to execute an external ping command and collect the result, it can be done by using the Runtime class. Runtime's exec method returns a Process supplying you with an input stream containing the ping result. You must make sure to read the output on the go (to avoid blocking the entire process).
Here's an outline:
import java.io.*;
public class Ping {
    public static void main(String args[]) {
        try {
            String[] cmd = { "ping.exe", "time.nist.gov" }; // Command and argument
            Process process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmd); // Execute command
            // Read output - in separate thread
            streamReader sr = new streamReader( process.getInputStream() );
            sr.start();
            process.waitFor(); // Wait until process has terminated
        } catch (Exception e) {
            System.err.println(e);
class streamReader extends Thread { // Read input stream (new thread)
    InputStream is;
    streamReader(InputStream is) {
        this.is = is;
    public void run() {
        try {
            BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(is));
            String rline;
            while ( (rline = br.readLine()) != null)
                System.out.println(rline);
            } catch (IOException e) {
                System.err.println(e);

DynDNS with B.T homehub? Does it/can it work??

Hi, I have a security system at home that I wish to view over the net. I have B.T homehub 2.0 I cannot externally ping my ip address (dynamic ip), so therefore cannot view the cameras over the net. (cameras installed for the safety of my disabled fiance) B.T have told me I need a static ip address and so need to switch to BT business broadband and thus drop the BT vision as it doesnt work on the business server. Then they are talking about charging me over £200 as the termination fee of the vision service which I actually want!! My question is can I somehow use DynDNS with the dynamic ip address so I can view the security system? Ive looked at the DynDNS.com web site......'dynamic DNS hosting' but not sure this will work. We've tried the port forwarding with Dyndns but after tracing the ping it gets stopped at BT. My brother is an i.t specialist but is also baffled after trying this. Can anyone help?

I have HH 2 and have used DynDNS to view my Website so it does work. I have my website hosted and only use DynDNS to test. I run a local apache webserver in order to serve my website in this way. The only advantage of using DynDNS is that if your dynamic IP address changes (line disconnected or hub powered off) there is a setting in the hub which will update your new IP address to DynDNS.
You will also need to allow connections through firewalls. How does your camera system serve the images - does it have a separate IP address? The user manual for the system might give you clues to remote viewing.
Try switching all firewalls off and try your IP address.
Peter

BEFSR41 V3.0 - DHCP server periodically stops working; rest of functions ok

I have a BEFSR41 V3.0 latest firmware (1.0.5).
Sometimes the DHCP server will stop working. The rest of the functions are ok. I normally monitor the unit via PING and unfortunately, this won't alert me if the DHCP server stops working because the unit still responds to a ping.
Does anyone know of a fix?
The workaround is to power cycle the unit, but that needs me to be at the office and I'm not always here.

It is the DHCP server within the Linksys BEFSR41 that intermittently stops working. I do not have another DHCP server on the network.
I'm curious why changing the MTU would help. If you could explain, I'd certainly give that a try.
At the moment, the BEFSR41 serves as the DHCP server and firewall for our guest network. I keep an eye on it by enabling external ping response. However, I have found that the firewall part of the BEFSR41 will work and it will respond to a ping. But newly connected computers won't get an IP address lease. I power cycle the unit and its DHCP server will work again. The trouble is, because the unit responds to a ping, I won't know if the DHCP server is not working until someone reports it. And I'd like to be proactive about things.
Message Edited by boomer on 04-06-2009 05:17 PM

Unknown firewall log entries Home Hub 2

Hi,
could anyone explain what the following are on my event log please?.
FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 3): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 81.134.23.245 Dst ip: 81.154.36.164 Type: Destination Unreachable Code: Host Unreacheable - this appears quite a few times over the space of two hours this evening.
Also, :
UPnP action 'DeletePortMapping' from ip=192.16x.xx (No such entry in array)
19:56:22 26 Apr
UPnP action 'DeletePortMapping' from ip=192.16x.xx(No such entry in array)
The IP address in this one corresponds to a known/recognised device.
Very garetful if anyone can help explain what these mean. And,if they are anything to worry aboout.
Thanks.

camper wrote:
Hi,
could anyone explain what the following are on my event log please?.
The IP address in this one corresponds to a known/recognised device.
Very garetful if anyone can help explain what these mean. And,if they are anything to worry aboout.
Thanks.
FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 3): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 81.134.23.245 Dst ip: 81.154.36.164 Type: Destination Unreachable Code: Host Unreacheable - this appears quite a few times over the space of two hours this evening.
That is an external "ping" request from the Internet that has been blocked, Probably someone trying to find whether there is anything worth trying to hack into.
UPnP action 'DeletePortMapping' from ip=192.16x.xx (No such entry in array)
Thats an application on your device which is trying to open an incoming port, perhaps you have a game or IM program running?
If not, then disable uPnP on the home hub.
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

RG54G2 Wireless Router Internet Connection Problem

Hi,
(apologies for the long message - trying to cover all details - summary: wireless router often drops internet connection)
I recently bought an RG54G2 Wireless Router, a CB54G2 PCMCIA Wireless card and a D-Link GWL-630 PCMCIA Wireless card. In addition to two laptops connected to the wireless router WLAN, I have two PCs (one Win WP Pro SP 1 and one Win98SE) connected to the router via wired LAN. I also have a SurfBoard SB3100 Cable Modem connected to the WAN port (this connects to my ISP - Optusnet (Australia) via DHCP).
The problem I have is that the internet connection is disconnected many times a day (often every few minutes, sometimes an hour or so). I am able to reconnect by resetting the wireless router via the wireless router configuration page. When the internet is disconnected I am still able to access the computers on the LAN/WLAN (via Windows Explorer and Ping), I am also able to ping the router and the Cable Modem, but nothing outside of the cable modem.
Also, when the internet is disconnected the System Status page indicates that the router is still connected to the internet, and the Diagnostics page passes the Test Connection test, though no external pings work.
I did not have this problem when the cable modem was connected directly to the Win98SE PC (and other PCs via ICS).
I have disabled the WLAN and the problem still exists with only the wired LAN.
I have changed numerous settings in the wireless router config page with no success (eg disabling DHCP and setting each IP address, minimising LAN and WLAN speeds to 10 and 11MBps plus others).
I have upgraded the wireless router firmware to R1.0.6.0 (no change to the problem).
Searching on Google I have found several other cases of routers with unstable internet connections (none refering to the MSI routers), but none had solutions that helped my situation (most replies suggested updating the firmware).
Any suggestions of how to make the router internet connection stable?
Thanks,
Mike

maybe this is the FIX 4 wireles router internet connection problem
please let me know if any one fix the problem with this tips
thankz
M. B. Feb 6 2004, 8:20 am hide options
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows
From: "M. B." - Find messages by this author
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:20:48 GMT
Local: Fri, Feb 6 2004 8:20 am
Subject: SOLUTION to my router loosing connection to Windows XP
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
I am happy to report that after 8 days of constant battles, reboots, phone
calls, cable pulling, router changing, it seems that I finally have found a
combination that has had me using Verizon DSL account for over 12 hours so
far without any kind of interruptions.
Since so many of you tried giving me comments and suggestions, I felt that
it is necessary for me to post this here so that the next person will not
(hopefully) need to go through this hell as I did!
My original problem was that when after I purchased a D-Link Wireless Router
DI-624, I would get disconnected from Verizon DSL at least once every 2
hours or so. My internet access would "freeze" and then a little popup box
at the bottom right system tray would tell me that the "LAN cable has been
unplugged". After about a minute or so, my internet connection would be
back working This was NEVER happening during the 2+ years I was using my
Westell modem alone (running in router mode).
Please keep in mind: The problem I was having was not wireless related as
it was happening to the desktop computer to which the router/westell was
connected to!
During these last 8 days, I tried: one DI-624 wireless router, two Netgear
614v3 routers and two Linksys WRT54G v.2 routers. In addition, I received a
brand new Westell 2200 modem from Verizon. I also tried about four
different CAT-5 cables. Here is the final outcome:
I have the Linksys WRT54G (version 2) wireless router connected to the
Netgear Fast Ethernet FA310TX network card in Auto-Sense mode (using the
built-in XP drivers, as Netgear told me that there was never a newer
revision released). I have DISABLED the built-in 3Com Gigabit LOM (3C940)
network card (via the ASUS P4C800 Deluxe motherboard BIOS), DISABLED the
Zero Wireless Configuration service, and have put in the IP/Gateway/DNS
address numbers inside my Windows XP Network Connections | LAN setup. My
operating system is Windows XP Pro SP1 and the modem is a Westell 2200
configured as bridge only.
If my situation continues to be stable, I *might* try to go back to the 3Com
built-in card (disable any power management) and then re-enabling the Zero
Wireless Configuration services. But in reality, I am happy with the way
things are and have already spent enough time trying to get my router to
work with Verizon DSL without having it drop connections!
Now, the next step will be setting up the WIRELESS part of this. I don't
even yet have a laptop with me on the premises, but the 802.11g card that I
already have is the D-Link DWL-G650. I hope and assume that this will work
okay with the Linksys...
One thing I must say is that I never realized that how many problems other
users are having. I would have thought that since 802.11x has been around
in the mainstream by now 2+ years, that things would have been much more
"system friendlier". And again, my issues were not even WIRELESS related.
All 3 tech supports were not really helpful, as none of them realized that
the problem is somehow between the router and Windows XP (Ethernet card?)
loosing a connection, which of course results in Verizon DSL loosing the
connection also.
One other comment about the Netgear 614 v.3 router: A number of people have
responded to tell me that they have had this random "router resetting"
happen to them (where the routers behaves as if someone turned the power off
and then back on, and the lights flash) just as if you first turn it on). I
was lucky to witness it myself during one of the "disconnects" that I had.
This was actually the reason why I went back to try the Linksys one more
time. So, I would definitely recommend staying way from this 614 (version
3) model.
Once again - THANK YOU everyone!

RV120W ROUTER/FIREWALL "cannot display the webpage"

I have a small LAN utilizing a T1 line from One Communications. Static IP address.
30 workstations. Windows 2003 DHCP server.
Installed new RV-120W firewall router last week replacing an old Netgear unit.
Setup VPN tunnel on unit, have remote access in for about 10 users.
That part works good. A tad slow, but acceptable.
My Issue: internet connectivity on internal LAN is in and out. It is extrememly choppy.
Download and Upload speeds have been consistent (~2.5M/sec)
External Pings show very minimal loss if any.
Users have seem intermitant loss of web streams and corrupt downloads. 90% web activity is ok, but then we keep getting "cannot display webpage error".
NSLOOKUP will show DNS, but occasssionally "TIMEOUT" occurs.
I had provider perform loop-back tests and replace WIC on CISCO T1 1841 Router, but I am still seeing the behavior.
In reading other forms, I am seeing this is a continuous issue with the RV routers.
My settings...
Static IP / DNS on Router.
MTU set back at 1500. I have adjusted it down incrementally to 1350.
Windows 2003 Server has RV120W address as router / gateway.
T1 to CISCO 1841 ROUTER... to CISCO RV120W...to LAN via (2) CISCO SLM248G Switches.
I did not setup any port forwards.
I am continuing Line tests on my end, but like I said this issue was not existent with Netgear unit.
Please advise with any setting changes / suggestions.

Hi Jason et al..
i believe the technician are now aware of a UDP issue on the Rv120W.
The internal discussions on the issue from R&D and development seems to be;
1.       By default on RV120W there is a UDP Flood attack check which limits 25 UDP Connections Per Client in one instance, i.e at a particular time instance a PC behind this router can establish only 25 UDP Transactions, if we exceed router drops UDP Packets.
2.       We have a script that sends dns lookup queries at a very high rate than the router clears the UDP entries, this way we build up the UDP entry table in the router(i.e 25 entries)
3.       Once 25 limit is reached we are unable to resolve further DNS queries, using the script or using the browser.
4.       In the real world scenarios there might be one PC behind the router and open a website where all the items on the webpage are linked to different website, if you open this kind of website it may have links to more that 25 different website and clog the routers UDP table for that particular PC and user might not be able to resolve further DNS queries and unable to browse any new websites. This unability to browse happens until the UDP entries on the router time outs and are cleared.
5.       This limit of 25 is because of the feature called Block UDP flood on the router which is enabled by default.
6.       Once we disable the block UDP Flood, router does not check for 25 UDP Connections limit and dns resolution is continuous without a break.
This is what a customers in the field might be seeing interruptions in DNS resolutions and website browse failed.
Some customers explicitly talked about DNS failures.
Jason I can see you have placed a service call, so hopefully CCORAL who posted on the 15 August should be helping you.
So Folks, If the Technician deem the problem not a hardware issue requiring RMA, the technician will escalate the call to our Level 2 folks in Irvine, probably CCORAL. You will get assistance to resolve this issue.
The Small Business Support center, should be aware of the problem. Please feel free to show them this posting, i am willing to chat with them to get the ball rolling.
So again, if you have not done so already, please contact the SBSC and place a service request and keep a copy of that number they give you as a reference (you may need it). My appologies for the inconvenience you have all had.
regards
Dave Hornstein
Small Business, Channel Systems Engineer
Cisco - Research Triangle Park. USA
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

ASA 5505: unable to ping external hosts

Hi,
I have a LAN behind ASA 5505, interface NAT/PAT is configured.
External interface is configured for PPPoE.
Everything works fine except I cannot ping from a LAN PC external hosts. I can however ping external hosts from ASA itself. ICMP is allowed:
icmp permit any inside
icmp permit any outside
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any
Protocol inspections and fixups are default.
When I ping an external host 61.95.50.185 from the LAN host 10.2.32.68 I am getting the following in the log:
302020 61.95.50.185 10.2.32.68 Built ICMP connection for faddr 61.95.50.185/0 gaddr 202.xx.yy.zz/1 laddr 10.2.32.68/512
302020 61.95.50.185 202.xx.yy.zz Built ICMP connection for faddr 61.95.50.185/0 gaddr 202.xx.yy.zz/1 laddr 202.xx.yy.zz/1
313004 Denied ICMP type=0, from laddr 61.95.50.185 on interface outside to 202.xx.yy.zz: no matching session
313001 61.95.50.185 Denied ICMP type=0, code=0 from 61.95.50.185 on interface outside
302021 61.95.50.185 202.xx.yy.zz Teardown ICMP connection for faddr 61.95.50.185/0 gaddr 202.xx.yy.zz/1 laddr 202.xx.yy.zz/1
302021 61.95.50.185 10.2.32.68 Teardown ICMP connection for faddr 61.95.50.185/0 gaddr 202.xx.yy.zz/1 laddr 10.2.32.68/512
Where 202.xx.yy.zz is IP of external interface of ASA.
This is a very simple setup that runs on a number of othe PIXes/ASAs and pings to external IP normally work just fine. I can't understand why ping replies are getting dropped on the interface?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thank you.
Alex

Alex / Kerry, you have couple of options for handling icmp outbound, either acl or icmp inspection :
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any echo-reply
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any source-quench
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any unreachable
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any time-exceeded
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
or icmp inspection instead of acl.
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect icmp
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094e8a.shtml
HTH
Jorge

Can PING/ASDM/SSH to External IP but not to Internal IP on PIX itself

We have two networks HQ and Site1 and for some reason we can’t ping the inside IP for Site1 PIX device. We have site-site-VPN set up between the two and everything works fine except we can’t ping the Site1 PIX from internal IP. However, I can ASDM/SSH in from HQ to the external IP of the Site1 PIX.
HQ is using an ASA 5550 (172.1.0.1)
PC from HQ (172.1.64.x)
Site1 is using a PIX-515E (172.2.0.1)
PC from Site1 (172.2.64.x)
Ping from HQ PC to Site1 PC (172.1.64.x to 172.2.64.x) works fine
Ping from Site1 PC to HQ PC (172.2.64.x to 172.1.64.x) works fine
Ping from HQ PC to Site1 PIX internal IP (172.1.64.x to 172.2.0.1) doesn’t work
Ping from HQ PC to Site1 PIX external IP (172.1.64.x to Site1 external IP) works fine
ASDM/SSH from any HQ PC to Site1 PIX internal IP (172.1.64.x to 172.2.0.1) doesn’t work
ASDM/SSH from any HQ PC to Site1 PIX external IP (172.1.64.x to Site1 external IP) works fine
Everything was working fine until we recently changed the outside IP address for Site1 because we switch to a different ISP. Nothing changed on the HQ ASA or Site1 PIX other than the outside IP address on Site1 PIX. I did rebuild the site-to-site VPN tunnel between Site1 and HQ.
Thanks first in advance for any ideas/suggestions.

Thanks Julio for your reply. We are currently running PIX Version 8.0 (3) and yes we do have management-access inside configured.
Cisco PIX Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(3)
Device Manager Version 6.0(3)
Hardware: PIX-515E, 128 MB RAM, CPU Pentium II 433 MHz
console timeout 0
management-access inside
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list

ITunes + Ping extremely slow with Library on external HD

Hi,
My Library is on an external HD connected to an Airport Extreme base station. My MacBook is connected wired to Airport, so there are no possible wifi connection issues.
iTunes is extremely slow since version 10. If I select a song and want to select another one, I've got a spinning beach ball for at least 20s. Change a rating: 20s delay. Every move I make: at least 20s delay...
My guess: every time I select a song, iTunes connects to Ping to fill up the dropdown menu next to the song title. Disabling Ping doesn't help. I tried in Terminal "defaults write com.apple.iTunes hide-ping-dropdown -bool TRUE", but this merely hides the dropdown menu, it doesn't stop the functionality.
iTunes is basically not usable anymore.
Any suggestions?

talie wrote:
I am running iTunes 11 with the media files stored on an external hard-drive. This setup works great except for one thing:
If I am currently downloading something from the iTunes Store and I quit iTunes
Don't quit iTunes.
How can I make iTunes see the interrupted download and not have to restart the download from the beginning?
You cannot.

DNS resolving to external IP when ping.

Hi expert folks...have a question....when pinging to some of the client with in the LAN it resolve to external public IP instead of private IP ...i had checked and confirmed the client that that clients configured to DNS server IP with in the LAN.No external
DNS been configured...this doesn't not occur all the time with all clients...its happened some time with some clients...after few minutes when we re-ping or after refresh it is back to normal private IP.....Could please advice what could be the possibility
of this..?

Hi...Thanks for your guidance ...I had verified the configuration you mentioned on your post... DNS search suffix order was fine so i haven't made any changes on that ...also TTL time remains as default...i found that some clients have external
DNS on their DNS configuration list ...I had removed those........still i wonder even if external DNS configured it should be only in action ,when primary and secondary internal DNS cannot resolve .Also another interesting this i noticed ,when the address
resolved to external DNS the TTL is 65 and when it resolve to internally TTL 128 for all clients.I guess it jumping to external DNS bypassing internal DNS servers.So far i haven't experience same issue again that's why I cannot provide the outcome of
nslookup...appreciate your help and guidance.
The root cause was the external DNS servers on your clients. The DNS client side resolver service algorithm, looks at the first entry, and ONLY if it does not answer, which results in a NULL or NACK response, will it go to the second entry. If it does answer,
even if the answer is an "I don't know," the client will take that as an answer and look no further. This algorithm, in case you're wondering, which many do, is not just the way Microsoft operating systems work. It's based on the IETF RFC industry standards
that all manufacturers must adhere to.
The proper way to configure all machines, especially in an AD environment, is to only use your internal DNS servers on every machine, nothing else, including the router as a DNS address (you would be surprised how many do use that because the ISP told them
it's ok), and in your DNS server properties, you can optionally configure a forwarder to your ISPs. That's the only place any external DNS servers can exist internally, in a Forwarder or Stub.
More on the resolver service:
This blog discusses:
WINS NetBIOS, Browser Service, Disabling NetBIOS, & Direct Hosted SMB (DirectSMB). Troubleshooting the browser service.
Client side resolution process chart.
The DNS Client Side Resolver algorithm.
If one DC or DNS goes down, does a client logon to another DC or use the other DNS server in the NIC?
DNS Forwarders Algorithm and multiple DNS addresses (if you've configured more than one forwarders or more than one IP in the NIC's DNS list)
Client side resolution process chart
Published by Ace Fekay, MCT, MVP DS on Nov 29, 2009 at 10:28 PM 1764 1
http://msmvps.com/blogs/acefekay/archive/2009/11/29/dns-wins-netbios-amp-the-client-side-resolver-browser-service-disabling-netbios-direct-hosted-smb-directsmb-if-one-dc-is-down-does-a-client-logon-to-another-dc-and-dns-forwarders-algorithm.aspx
DNS Clients and Timeouts (Part 1 & Part 2), karammasri [MSFT] Dec 2011 6:18 AM
http://blogs.technet.com/b/stdqry/archive/2011/12/02/dns-clients-and-timeouts-part-1.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/stdqry/archive/2011/12/15/dns-clients-and-timeouts-part-2.aspx
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCSE 2012, MCITP EA & MCTS Windows 2008/R2, Exchange 2013, 2010 EA & 2007, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

I'm having problems loading web pages on a vmware workstation 6.05 guest OS using Firefox 3.5.9. I can ping external websites fine from the guest. No proxy. Any ideas?

I'm having problems loading web pages on a vmware workstation 6.05 guest OS using Firefox 3.5.9. Also tried the latest 3.6 version. I can ping external websites fine from the guest. No proxy. Any ideas?
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== I installed a guest OS

I'm using the same swear words as you. There are several threads about this problem - no answers.
I have a LaserJet 8100N and 8150DN, get the 79.01FE error on the 8150 from print outs from Safari, Firefox, and Preview, for only some sites/documents. CNN.com has become my test site, seems I can crash the printer 90% of the time with their home page at any given time in the day.
A summary of what I have tried:
- Upgraded the firmware to the latest for both the JetDirect card and the printer.
- Swapped the JetDirect cards between the 8100 and 8150.
- Swapped ram on the 8150 board.
- Disconnected external trays, bins, and removed extra RAM and hard drives from the 8150.
- Tried setting the JetDirect link and matching switch port link to 100FD, 10HD, 10FD, 100HD, as suggested by a poster.
- Tried having client's print to the printer through a XServer Print Server.
- Can consistently create the error from multiple systems running 10.3.9, 10.4.5, and 10.4.6 (didn't have an install base of 10.4 before 10.4.5).
Someone in the 'know' (which means they're likely not), said 10.4.7 will likely fix this. Being Apple has not even addressed that the problem exists (that I could find), I doubt the magic fix is a release away.
Apple's software is triggering something that Windows systems appears not to be, so one could say it's an Apple problem; but ulimately it's HP's software/hardware that is at fault in that it is allowing their system to crash from input alone.
G4/G5 XServes

SRP 527W - ping external WAN port

Hi,
As a raw test it is handy for us to ping externally tne WAN port of the SRP 527W, gives us a quick idea of whether it is responding.
Can someone advise how we configure the SRP 527W to allow this? FYI we have the inbulit SRP firewall enabled.
Cheers,
Dale.

Tom,
That did the trick - I looked at that setting however it seemed to sound a little wide ranging to just be "allow incoming ICMP requests"
Thank you for such a quick and correct response - solved!!
Cheers,
Dale.

SRP547W external ping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for