SRST with T1 CAS MGCP Gateway

Hello - we are trying to configure SRST on our T1 CAS MGCP gateway. We have been informed by a Cisco engineer that we cannot use SRST on a T1 CAS MGCP gateway and that the gateway must first be reconfigured as an H.323 gateway in order to implement SRST. Router is version 12.2(15)T14 and CCM 4.1 Any comments would be truly appreciated...thank you.

SRST doesn't support MGCP but does support MGCP to H.323 failback. You can still configure your router/CCM with MGCP then use the fallback commands for MGCP.
Looking at the SRST 4.0 system guide, page 42, T1 CAS is supported. With your version of IOS you would be running SRST 2.1, this is also supported.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t15/srst21/srstv21.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/srst/srst40/srst40ad/s40sa.pdf
The ccm-manager fallback-mgcp command was added in IOS 12.2(11)T so it should be in your version. This is what you would need to do MGCP fallback to your H323 along with the call application alternate default.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123tcr/123tvr/vrht_c4.htm#wp1061367
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123tcr/123tvr/vrht_c1.htm#wp1670149
I would say it might be possible as I don't see anything saying no. Though remember MGCP fallback to H323 over SRST doesn't have call preservation.
Lastly here is a document on the SRST MGCP/H323 fallback.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_configuration_example09186a008012ecc6.shtml
Please rate any helpful posts
Thanks
Fred

Similar Messages

  • Remote C2901 MGCP gateway won't register with CUCM

    Hi, all,
    We have a central call manager, we are setting up a remote office with a C2901 voice gateway that has a T1 PRI, this gateway is being configured as a H.323 gateway, everything worked fine. Now I want to get SRST working such that when WAN goes down, employees can still make outbound calls and take inbound calls. I followed SRST documentations when configuring CUCM and C2901, I would say the documentations are clear and easy to follow -- only thing is there is no adequate explanation of why those commands need to be there and I can not get SRST to work.
    1), First, a basic concept question, why do we need to configure "ccm-manager fallback-mgcp"? or any MGCP related configuration on C2901? how does MGCP play the role in SRST? the router is configured as a simple voice gateway, when WAN is intact, we use H.323 protocol, when WAN goes down, we still don't need MGCP ...
    2), Assuming that we needed all those SRST related MGCP configuration, I would expect C2901 to register to call manager, but I could not get this device to register as a MGCP gateway, debug mgcp packets shows:
    *Sep  5 16:52:47.571: MGCP Packet sent to 10.128.181.5:2427--->
    RSIP 201356931 *@voicegw-remoteoffice.local.domain MGCP 0.1
    RM: restart
    <---
    *Sep  5 16:52:47.631: MGCP Packet received from 10.128.181.5:2427--->
    500 201356931
    <---
    I verified the domain name is exactly the same as the name configured on CUCM, I tried multiple time toggling ip domain name on C2901 also, somehow CUCM does not like RSIP message from C2901, I don't have knowledge to get debug information from CUCM side of why CUCM does not like the MGCP message sent by C2901
    3), When the communication is blocked from C2901 to central call manager (by using a simple ACL on C2901's default gateway device), I can still make the inbound call to an IP phone, which means, phones were correctly registered to C2901 when communication to call manager is broken, but I can not make outbound call, phones always get quick busy beeps, test call from C2901 itself (by using "csim start") is fine, which means dial-plan and ISDN/PRI is fine.
    I believe we are just doing very very basic configuration and this is a common scenario, what could I do wrong?

    You dont need the mgcp related commands if you are using H323. The commands that you need are:
    application
    global
    service alternate default
    call-manager-fallback (or) telephony-service and the relevant commands under it.
    Also make sure that SRST reference has been added to the DP and the phones reset after the change made. This is what tell the phone to register to the SRST gateway when the WAN is down. The IP specified in the SRST reference should match whats configured under call-manager-fallback.

  • Trouble adding second port BRI in a 2801 MGCP gateway

    my config is CCM 413 with a 2801 SRST including a VIC2-2BRI .
    I have configured the 2801 as MGCP gateway on the CCM, added the module VIC2-2BRI and configured the BRI 0/0/0 in this gateway.
    this BRI work properly with the PSTN . I can make successfull call inbound and outbound
    Now I want to add the second BRI (ie BRI 0/0/1 ) in the gateway for the same hunt group, the same PSTN provider.
    When I do that this BRI can't register and make different kind of problem on the existing well working BRI.
    for example I noticed that I can make inbound or outbound call with connected state but no voice in the two way.
    I noticed also that the first BRI become completely blocked after two call.
    I have verified the conf of the BRI 0/0/1 but i don't see any difference with the BRI 0/0/0 .
    the only way to get back good working of the BRI 0/0/0 is to remove BRI 0/0/1 from the gateway conf.

    Hello,
    That is a good news though. Can you please share to me the TAC case nr? So I can refer this to tAC. Because we have also opened a CASE for the same problem on the 3725 but not hear from TAC yet for the patch!
    I got another image ie. IPVOICE version 12.4.1.9 from a friend that has the patch for this problem on the 2801 but there is no SPSERVICES image yet.
    Now it looks that Cisco has a newer image.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards

  • CUCM 9 & AS5850, Using MGCP Gateways not found in "Gateway Type" list...

    I have an application where I need to control a large, AS5850 gateway using MGCP.  CUCM version is 9.1, soon to be 10.0.  The gateway is populated with CT3 cards.
    We have confirmed that the AS5850 does in fact support MGCP, however it is not listed as an option in the list of gateway product choices when adding a new gateway in CUCM.  So my first question:
    1) How do you add an MGCP gateway in CUCM when it is not listed in the "gateway type" drop-down list?  It seems there must be a way to do this.  Other well known gateways such as the AS5300, AS5400 etc.. are also notably absent from the list of gateway choices.  Perhaps there is a template that can be edited?
    If anyone has experience utilizing an AS5850 gateway with CUCM & MGCP, it would be very useful to see sample configuration programming from your gateway.
    Many thanks

    Hi,
    As per the datasheet, the Cisco AS5850 Universal Gateway supports H.323,  SIP, and MGCP call-control protocols with extensive SNMP management and  debugging capabilities. It works with the Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch,  the Cisco BTS 10200 Softswitch, and many partner softswitches as well.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iad/ps509/ps512/product_data_sheet09186a008007cc48.html
    It looks like that its not supported with CUCM.
    HTH
    Manish

  • Set B Channel ID information to Preferred in MGCP Gateway

    Hi All,
    We recently had some E1 PRI issues and our Service Provider has asked us to set B Channel ID information to Preferred.
    We are using a MGCP Gateway with CUCM 9.1.2
    When we enable ISDN debug we could see the Channel ID as Exclusive.
    Jul 25 13:02:07.566: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x0043
            Sending Complete
            Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
                    Standard = CCITT
                    Transfer Capability = Speech
                    Transfer Mode = Circuit
                    Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
            Channel ID i = 0xA98381
                    Exclusive, Channel 1
    I tried to change it to Preferred by configuring the command, "isdn negotiate-bchan"   under the serial interface but still debug shows it as Exclusive only.
    Let me know whether we can change the B Channel information either in CUCM or MGCP Gateway.

    Hi
    Can you try the below:-
    1- interface x/x/x:15
    isdn protocol-emulate network
     isdn bchan-number-order ascending
    then test again
    2-Go to CUCM - gateway and do the below
    CHANNEL IE TYPE " TIMESLOTS " 
    Thanks
    please rate all useful information

  • MGCP Gateways and Cisco Fax

    We are considering adding a fax solution to our IPT infrastructure using Cisco Fax (Captaris RightFax). Ideally we would like the same voice gateways to terminate the fax calls (internal voice calls use QSIG and external calls use Q.931). Can this be achieved with MGCP-controlled Voice gateways? Can T.38 fax be configured with an MGCP gateway. I have seen examples where H.323 dial-peers are required to talk SIP to the Fax Server.
    If not, is an alternative to use a back-to-back PRI connection between a voice gateway port and the Fax Server ISDN card, with appropriate route patterns in CallManager to route the fax calls to Fax Server, using Cisco Fax Relay?

    with cm 4.2.3 there is mgcp t.38 support implemented.
    see release notes cm 4.2.3
    http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/products/ps6729/c1178/ccmigration_09186a0080724724.pdf
    regards
    mehmet

  • Issue when Creating a Federation Trust with MFG (Microsoft Federation Gateway)

    I am trying to create a Federation Trust with MFG (Microsoft Federation Gateway).  However, I am running into a problem.  I see in the following that link (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607475(v=exchg.141).aspx)
    that I have to run this command:
    Set-ExchangeServer -Identity "MAIL01" -InternetWebProxy "<Webproxy URL>"
    Please note that I have the following in our Exchange 2010 SP3 environment:
    Two CAS/HT Servers (CAS Array between the two)
    Two mailbox servers (DAG between the two)
    One mailbox server (for stand-alone mailbox/archive databases)
    We use windows load balancing and the internal/external VIP name is "mail.domain.com"
    1. What do I put for the "Web Proxy URL"?
    2. Do I have to run the Set-ExchangeServer -Identity "MAIL01" -InternetWebProxy "<Webproxy URL>" command on every server?

    The link you posted is different than free-busy sharing through the Microsoft Federation Gateway.  All you need to establish Organization Relationships through the Microsoft Federation Gateway is properly published Autodiscover and Exchange Web Services. 
    You can use the Exchange Remote Connectivity Analyzer (http://exrca.com) to validate that.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • CUCM 9.1.1 - MGCP gateway won't register to my 2811

    Hello
    I am trying to add a MGCP gateway on a 2811.
    I have configured as per the book, but it is not registering,
    here is my Router config:
    2811 uptime is 2 hours, 4 minutes
    System returned to ROM by power-on
    System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-11.XJ4.bin"
    Cisco 2811 (revision 53.50) with 509952K/14336K bytes of memory.
    Processor board ID FHK1302F0YV
    3 FastEthernet interfaces
    24 Serial interfaces
    1 Channelized T1/PRI port
    1 Virtual Private Network (VPN) Module
    DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity enabled.
    239K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
    125440K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (Read/Write)
    Configuration register is 0x2102
    2811#sh run
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 7125 bytes
    version 12.4
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    no service password-encryption
    hostname 2811
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    card type t1 0 2
    enable secret 5 $1$ax07$1yOFpGS1rHGYm873l9n9q/
    no aaa new-model
    clock timezone PCLAIRE -5
    clock summer-time PCLAIRE recurring
    network-clock-participate wic 2
    network-clock-select 1 T1 0/2/0
    ip cef
    no ip dhcp use vrf connected
    ip domain name homelab.local
    multilink bundle-name authenticated
    isdn switch-type primary-ni
    voice-card 0
    dspfarm 
    dsp services dspfarm
    controller T1 0/2/0
    framing esf
    linecode b8zs
    pri-group timeslots 1-24
    description Home_PBX
    vlan internal allocation policy ascending
    interface FastEthernet0/0/0
    description To Home Network$ETH-LAN$
    ip address 192.168.15.50 255.255.255.0
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    interface Serial0/2/0:23
    description Home_PBX
    no ip address
    encapsulation ppp
    isdn switch-type primary-ni
    isdn incoming-voice voice
    control-plane
    voice-port 0/2/0:23
    description Home_PBX
    ccm-manager mgcp
    ccm-manager config server 192.168.15.11 - THIS IS THE SUBSCRIBER , SHOULD IT BE THE PUBLISHER ?
    ccm-manager config
    mgcp     
    gateway  
    timer receive-rtp 1200
    Here is what I get:
    2811(config)#do sh ccm-manager
    MGCP Domain Name: 2811.homelab.local
    Priority        Status                   Host
    ============================================================
    Primary         None                    
    First Backup    None                    
    Second Backup   None                    
    Current active Call Manager:    None
    Backhaul/Redundant link port:   2428
    Failover Interval:              30 seconds
    Keepalive Interval:             15 seconds
    Last keepalive sent:            09:55:04 PCLAIRE Jan 16 2014 (elapsed time: 02:00:24)
    Last MGCP traffic time:         11:34:19 PCLAIRE Jan 16 2014 (elapsed time: 00:21:08)
    Last failover time:             None
    Last switchback time:           None
    Switchback mode:                Graceful
    MGCP Fallback mode:             Not Selected
    Last MGCP Fallback start time:  None
    Last MGCP Fallback end time:    None
    MGCP Download Tones:            Disabled
    Backhaul/Redundant link is down
    Configuration Auto-Download Information
    =======================================
    No configurations downloaded
    Current state: Downloading XML file
    Configuration Download statistics:
            Download Attempted             : 1
              Download Successful          : 1
              Download Failed              : 0
            Configuration Attempted        : 0
              Configuration Successful     : 0
              Configuration Failed(Parsing): 0
              Configuration Failed(config) : 0
    Last config download command:
    FAX mode: cisco
    Configuration Error History:
    2811(config)#
    Any help greatly appreciated
    John Bachman

    Still same problem, I have erased all that related to mgcp on my router, to start from scratch
    2811(config)#controller T1 0/2/0
    2811(config-controller)#pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp
    Cannot overwrite no serv type with one. Unconfigure existing configuration and reconfigure
    2811(config-controller)#
    Where is this error coming from ??
    Here is what I want to try:
    192.168.15.10  - pub
    192.168.15.11 - sub
    controller T1 0/2/0
    pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp
    interface Serial0/0/0:23
    isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
    ccm-manager config server 192.168.15.10 192.168.15.11
    ccm-manager config
    ccm-manager redundant-host 192.168.15.11
    ccm-manager mgcp
    mgcp
    mgcp call-agent 192.168.15.10 service-type mgcp version 0.1

  • Cannot register MGCP gateway to CCM 4.1

    Hello,
       I am running an application which simulates a MGCP gateway vs. a real CCM 4.1. I am not able to register the endpoints as you can see from the snapshot attached. I guess the problems lies in the 200 response to the following AUEP:
    AUEP 89 AALN/S0/SU0/[email protected] MGCP 0.1
    F: X+SRTP/A
    200 89 OK
    X: 2
    L: p:20, a:PCMU, b:64, e:ON, s:ON
        I have also attached the trace file and CCM logs.
       I have 2 questions on this matter:
    what is the correct format of the 200 message which needs to be sent to AUEP with SRTP?
    how can I configure CCM not to sent this AUEP with SRTP(I have a similar one in my setup which is not sending this AUEP)?
    Thanks in advanced for you support,
    Ionut

    Restrictions for Cisco Multiservice IP-to-IP Gateway Configuration:
    Restrictions for SIP-to-SIP Call Signaling:
    Transcoding is not supported.
    SIP-to-H.323 Call-Signaling Features:
    Codec transcoding (G.711-G.729) - supported
    other:Transcoding is not supported on the Cisco 7200 and the Cisco 7301
    copied from:cisco Multiservice IP-to-IP Gateway
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5640/products_configuration_guide_book09186a0080409b6d.html
    I have not found a solution, but i'd be interested in what you find though.

  • FAX Detection Application for a MGCP Gateway

    Hi,
    I have an MGCP Gateway and a Right Fax Solution along with CUCM. Was wondering if FAX detection application can be configured for this setup or is FAX detection only for H323 gateways.
    Thanks
    Prakash

    It uses TCL script, so it is not available with MGCP.
    Chris

  • MGCP Gateway Help

    I have a site where they treat the employees, from a finance perspective, as 2 companies.  Because of this they was all their calls to go out different BRIs/PRIs so they can just charge each 'company' their share.  Last time I visited there I met with a reseller and one of their voice engineers said I could do this by creating 2 different MGCP gateways for the single router.  There may have been something I missed in translation (Japanese) but I cannot figure out how to make a second MGCP gateway for this router.
    Any ideas?

    Create different set of CSS, partitions, route patterns. Assign the new CSS to the other users with access to partitions that new duplicate route patterns are assigned to and point to the dedicated ports on the gateway.
    Chris
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • Mixing Ram with different CAS latencies in K7n2 Delta-L?

    I have been using 512mb Kingston Value Ram in my computer, pc3200, with CAS latency of 3.0.   I just purchased some Corsair value select 512mb ram pc3200 with CAS latency of 2.5.   I know you are not supposed to mix ram with different speeds (like 400 vs. 333) but does it matter if the CAS latencies are different?  
    I'm running an AMD XP 1800+, K7n2 delta-L, nforce2 motherboard from MSI.  Someone at a computer shop told me they tried mixing Kingston 3.0 CAS with Corsair 2.5 CAS, and said his computer wouldn't even post.  So I'm wondering if this is an isolated problem, or you will always run into this problem if you mix ram with different CAS latencies.
        If anyone has experience with this issue, please share with the board.  Thanks!
    Chris

    The age old question, will the components I bought be compatible ? There are those that have bought identical matching memory that didn't work. In my case, I had an ECS K7S5A that used PC2100 Crucial memory, the sticks neither matched (at one time they did, but one stick died and they sent me the closest thing they had.). Neither of these Crucial sticks was identified by a configurator as being compatible with the K7N2 Delta L that I decided to buy. In the end, not only did both sticks work, but I put them in as single channel mode (ram slots 1 & 2), but later changed the configuration to dual channel mode (ram slots 1 & 3, even 2 & 3). It worked flawlessly in all three configurations. Sorry for the long answer, but in essence, there are no guarantees and your worries will drive you crazy. When memory is mixed, you reduce the likelihood of compatibility, even when you go beyond the recommended products that were specifically identified.
    That guy at the computer shop, did he ever indicate or isolate the true reason why the memory wouldn't work ? Maybe, maybe not. I would think with a disparity in memory, the bios is the key to setting the settings for the worst stick of the bunch. Then again, the products you get might overclock to what the better sticks run at. My assumption is that mixed sticks, the bios retards settings to this in "auto" mode. When you force it manually, it may work or it may fail. One thing you oughta know, each and every stick has the manufacturers id encoded onto them at the very least, just like the firmware on other items indicates a manufacturer code and other data that allows these things to be compatible. So know you face that battle going in with any of them. If the bios programming doesn't allow it to work, from that perspective, there'll be problems.

  • HT1665 I have the iPhone 4S and would like to purchase docking device6. I have the Otter Box Camo case and would like to know which dock will work with the case ON. Thank you.

    I have the iPhone 4S and would like to purchase a docking device.  I have the Otter Box Camo case and would like to know which dock will work with the
    case ON.   Thank you.

    it might be better to contact otterbox to find out from them what they made it compatible with. 

  • Car charger doesn't fit with bumper case!!!!!!!!!

    Hi
    Just got my new bumper case on the free offer and it look great BUT my car charger doesn't fit with the case on ( I have tried 2 different types)
    The house charger fits fine.
    The car chargers were bought of the net, will I need one form the apple store to get it to work.
    Has anyone esle had this problem?
    This is my first I phone and its brilliant but this case fiasco is annoying!!!!
    Cheers Sandy

    Hi,
    This is an unfortunate fact. Some aftermarket products don't fit. I have an iTrip and I had to modify the plug to fit in. Simple with a dremel tool. File will work too. Cheaper than buying a new charger/FM transmitter.

  • IPhone 5s doesn't work with Mophie case on

    I bought Mophie last week at Verizon store. I am a caretaker and thought it would be great however I had to take Mophie off as when I have gone to recharge twice the screen zooms out of proportion AND worse phone will not work so off it came and phone is fine.  Phone is important and has to be dependable. I have 5s phone   With 5s case. Any suggestions as for now I am keeping case off

    Switch off zoom by double tapping with three fingers. Permanently disable it in Settings > General > Accessibility.

Maybe you are looking for