SSD based on ATP rule is not coming correctly

HI,
We have issue with one of the item for which Sheduled ship date based on ATP is going out of planning horizon, eventhough we have supplies available for it.
Issue in details:
1. We are creating manual IR and ISO for that item, by giving need by date say 3-Jan-15, but the ISO is having the SSD outside the planning horizon.
2. Checked for the available supply in ASCP planner workbench for the Org where ISO is getting booked and it is having enough supplies in the form of onhand, intransit shipments, planned orders. Checked for the onhand and it is pegged to Forecast demands and it is available to reserve and transact.
3. Checked for the item attribute for this part no, it has check ATP value as 'Material Only'
4. No ATP rule is defined in the item attribute for this item, also ATP component is having value as 'None'
5. Checked for the MRP item attributes and it is End assembly/soft pegging
6. Checked for the BOM and it has only single component in its BOM with the ATP flag unchecked for that component item in BOM and also at Org attribute level the ATP value is 'none' for component.
I am not able to figure out the reason why the SSD is going out of planning horizon eventhough there is enough supplies aviable in the ATP enabled ASCP plan.
Could you please help me for more checkpoints?
Thanks,
Avinash

HI Abhishek,
Thanks for the feedback, we have ATP results based on planning output. (Profile: INV:Capable to Promise=ATP/CTP Based on Planning output at site level)
We can see many exception messages generated for this item in ATP enabled ASCP plan:
1. Late supply pegged to Forecast
2. Orders with compression days
3. Past due Orders
4. Orders to be rescheduled in
5. Sourcing split percentage violated
Please check below screenshot for the same:
Also,
this plan has demand scheduled attached as Forecast sets
Thanks,
Avinash

Similar Messages

Substitution rule is not working correctly

Hi PS Gurus,
We have a problem in one of the newly created projects that the substitution rule is not working correctly; the data is not copied to the WBS element Cust. Enhancement tab.
Project 1 is working fine and the data is copied & Project 2 and Project 3 are not getting all the data copied to the WBS element,
In that project profile (substitution rule is given), substitution rule is also maintained
So please help why in one project substitution rule in working & other isnu2019t.
Many Thanks in Advance.
MM

Hello Menaka,
Select the WBS element in the project builder.
Cleck on Edit --> Validation Substitution --> Substitution
You will get the list of Substituitions, Double click on the required Substition rule.This action will generate a log, whether substitution has been succesfully caried out or with some error.
Kindly provide us that error log to guide you further.
Regards
Ravi

Rules are not working correctly in OCS 10.1.2

Hi,
A few days ago we have encountered a problem in which the BCC rules or any other rules are not processed out of the user's mailbox.
For example, a user goes to Oracle Mail (the web access, but not WAC), goes to Filters and creates a new rule for dealing with incoming mail (delivered or read, doesn't matter). The rule is processed ONLY if the the user asked to move/copy the mail to a subfolder IN HIS MAILBOX.
If the user asks to forward ("Send a blind copy to") the delivered mails to a different mailbox (e.g. in OCS or to externally to gmail), the mail is NOT processed by the filter.
Other than that mails are treated normally, incoming and outgoing. Manually forwarding to other OCS users also works, as well as forwarding to external mail systems such as gmail. Only the 'automatic' forward rule does not work.
We have checked that the rules/filters are created with " oesrl -p" - and they are created.
How can we troubleshoot this issue? Has anyone encountered it?
System details:
OCS 10.1.2
Platform: Red Hat AS 4
DB version: 10.1.0.4.2
Thanks,
-- Itay.

Update:
Problem resolved. restarted the SMTP-out service.

Output not coming correct

Hi,
I had developed this code and after all modifications and alterations in it ,i am pasting here bcoz it is still giving the problem that the values of ITAB does not contain the correct data as it keep on repeating the same value for the data in ITFINAL.
Plzz go through this code and help me out as i tried whole day and still it is not coming right.
My job is online bcoz if it start displaying correct data then i have to make addition in other code also. plzz helpme out as help will be definately rewarded.
here's the code:-
TABLES: BKPF,MKPF,BSIK.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITBKPF OCCURS 0,
      BUKRS LIKE BKPF-BUKRS,
      BELNR LIKE BKPF-BELNR,
      GJAHR LIKE BKPF-GJAHR,
      AWTYP LIKE BKPF-AWTYP,
      AWKEY LIKE BKPF-AWKEY,
      BUDAT LIKE BKPF-BUDAT,
      END OF ITBKPF.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITMKPF OCCURS 0,
      MBLNR LIKE MKPF-MBLNR,
      MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
      END OF ITMKPF.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB OCCURS 0,
      BELNR LIKE BSIK-BELNR,
      WRBTR LIKE BSIK-WRBTR,
      LIFNR LIKE BSIK-LIFNR,
      BUKRS LIKE BSIK-BUKRS,
      GJAHR LIKE BSIK-GJAHR,
      BUDAT LIKE BKPF-BUDAT,
      END OF ITAB.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITFINAL OCCURS 0,
      BUKRS LIKE BKPF-BUKRS,
      BELNR LIKE BKPF-BELNR,
      GJAHR LIKE BKPF-GJAHR,
      AWTYP LIKE BKPF-AWTYP,
      AWKEY LIKE BKPF-AWKEY,
      MBLNR LIKE MKPF-MBLNR,
      MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
      WRBTR LIKE BSIK-WRBTR,
      LIFNR LIKE BSIK-LIFNR,
      END OF ITFINAL.
*PARAMETERS: P_BUKRS LIKE BKPF-BUKRS,
           P_GJAHR LIKE BKPF-GJAHR,
           S_LIFNR LIKE BSIK-LIFNR.
SELECT-OPTIONS: P_BUKRS FOR BKPF-BUKRS,
                P_GJAHR FOR BKPF-GJAHR,
                S_LIFNR FOR BSIK-LIFNR.
      SELECT ABUKRS ABELNR AGJAHR AAWTYP AAWKEY ABUDAT INTO TABLE ITBKPF FROM BKPF AS A
      WHERE AAWTYP = 'MKPF' AND ABUKRS IN P_BUKRS AND A~GJAHR IN P_GJAHR.
      IF NOT ITBKPF[] IS INITIAL.
      SELECT AMBLNR AMJAHR INTO TABLE ITMKPF FROM MKPF AS A FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITBKPF WHERE A~MBLNR = ITBKPF-AWKEY(10).
      SELECT ABELNR AWRBTR ALIFNR ABUKRS AGJAHR BBUDAT FROM BSIK AS A
      INNER JOIN BKPF AS B ON BBELNR = ABELNR
      INTO TABLE ITAB
      WHERE
      A~LIFNR IN S_LIFNR.
      ENDIF.
SORT ITAB BY BELNR.
LOOP AT ITBKPF.
CLEAR ITMKPF.
READ TABLE ITMKPF
WITH KEY MBLNR = ITBKPF-AWKEY+(10)
          MJAHR = ITBKPF-AWKEY+10(4).
CHECK sy-subrc EQ 0.
ITFINAL-BELNR = ITBKPF-BELNR.
ITFINAL-GJAHR = ITBKPF-GJAHR.
ITFINAL-AWKEY = ITBKPF-AWKEY.
READ TABLE ITAB
WITH KEY BUKRS = ITBKPF-BUKRS.
CHECK sy-subrc EQ 0.
ITFINAL-WRBTR = ITAB-WRBTR.
ITFINAL-LIFNR = ITAB-LIFNR.
APPEND ITFINAL.
CLEAR ITFINAL.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT ITFINAL.
WRITE: / ITFINAL-BELNR , ITFINAL-GJAHR, ITFINAL-AWKEY+(10),ITFINAL-WRBTR ,ITFINAL-LIFNR .
ENDLOOP.

Hi,
I had checked the all Interenal Tables and each and every table is having the desiered data except ITFINAL.,it is storing the value of ITAB
i.e. displaying the same record for the data coming from the ITBKPF ,now my problelm is how to display the correct data from ITAB to the ITFINAL which is not able to store this coreect data,plzz help me out in solving this problem .
The code in am using right now is:-
TABLES: BKPF,MKPF,BSIK.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITBKPF OCCURS 0,
      BUKRS LIKE BKPF-BUKRS,
      BELNR LIKE BKPF-BELNR,
      GJAHR LIKE BKPF-GJAHR,
      AWTYP LIKE BKPF-AWTYP,
      AWKEY LIKE BKPF-AWKEY,
      BUDAT LIKE BKPF-BUDAT,
      END OF ITBKPF.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITMKPF OCCURS 0,
      MBLNR LIKE MKPF-MBLNR,
      MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
      END OF ITMKPF.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB OCCURS 0,
      BELNR LIKE BSIK-BELNR,
      WRBTR LIKE BSIK-WRBTR,
      LIFNR LIKE BSIK-LIFNR,
      BUKRS LIKE BSIK-BUKRS,
      GJAHR LIKE BSIK-GJAHR,
      BUDAT LIKE BKPF-BUDAT,
      END OF ITAB.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITFINAL OCCURS 0,
      BUKRS LIKE BKPF-BUKRS,
      BELNR LIKE BKPF-BELNR,
      GJAHR LIKE BKPF-GJAHR,
      AWTYP LIKE BKPF-AWTYP,
      AWKEY LIKE BKPF-AWKEY,
      MBLNR LIKE MKPF-MBLNR,
      MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
      WRBTR LIKE BSIK-WRBTR,
      LIFNR LIKE BSIK-LIFNR,
      END OF ITFINAL.
*PARAMETERS: P_BUKRS LIKE BKPF-BUKRS,
           P_GJAHR LIKE BKPF-GJAHR,
           S_LIFNR LIKE BSIK-LIFNR.
SELECT-OPTIONS: P_BUKRS FOR BKPF-BUKRS,
                P_GJAHR FOR BKPF-GJAHR,
                S_LIFNR FOR BSIK-LIFNR.
      SELECT ABUKRS ABELNR AGJAHR AAWTYP AAWKEY ABUDAT INTO TABLE ITBKPF FROM BKPF AS A
      WHERE AAWTYP = 'MKPF' AND ABUKRS IN P_BUKRS AND A~GJAHR IN P_GJAHR.
      IF NOT ITBKPF[] IS INITIAL.
      SELECT AMBLNR AMJAHR INTO TABLE ITMKPF FROM MKPF AS A FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITBKPF WHERE A~MBLNR = ITBKPF-AWKEY(10).
      SELECT ABELNR AWRBTR ALIFNR ABUKRS AGJAHR BBUDAT FROM BSIK AS A      "
      INNER JOIN BKPF AS B ON BBELNR = ABELNR
      INTO TABLE ITAB
      WHERE
      ALIFNR IN S_LIFNR.    "ABUKRS = B~BUKRS.
      ENDIF.
      SORT ITAB BY BELNR.
     SELECT ABELNR AWRBTR ALIFNR ABUKRS A~GJAHR FROM BSIK AS A INTO TABLE ITAB
     FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITBKPF
     WHERE
     ABUKRS = ITBKPF-BUKRS AND ALIFNR = S_LIFNR.
     ENDIF.
LOOP AT ITBKPF.
CLEAR ITMKPF.
READ TABLE ITMKPF
WITH KEY MBLNR = ITBKPF-AWKEY+(10)
          MJAHR = ITBKPF-AWKEY+10(4).
CHECK sy-subrc EQ 0.
ITFINAL-BELNR = ITBKPF-BELNR.
ITFINAL-GJAHR = ITBKPF-GJAHR.
ITFINAL-AWKEY = ITBKPF-AWKEY.
SORT ITAB[] BY BELNR GJAHR BUKRS.
READ TABLE ITAB
WITH KEY
BELNR = ITBKPF-BELNR
GJAHR = ITBKPF-GJAHR
BUKRS = ITBKPF-BUKRS
BINARY SEARCH.
CHECK sy-subrc EQ 0.
ITFINAL-WRBTR = ITAB-WRBTR.
ITFINAL-LIFNR = ITAB-LIFNR.
APPEND ITFINAL.
CLEAR ITFINAL.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT ITFINAL.
WRITE: / ITFINAL-BELNR , ITFINAL-GJAHR, ITFINAL-AWKEY+(10),ITFINAL-WRBTR ,ITFINAL-LIFNR .
ENDLOOP.
Edited by: abaper2008 on May 29, 2008 6:35 AM
Edited by: abaper2008 on May 29, 2008 9:21 AM

Wagetype calculation not coming correctly

Hi
Whenever we run a transfer action in between the payroll period wagetypes which we have maintained in 14 Infotype are not calculating correctly.
Ex: Performance pay wagetype is there Amt is Rs 1000 start date 01.04.2008 and end date 31.12.9999. If we run transfer action on 15.04.2008 at the end of the payroll period i.e., 30.04.2008 Payout in this particular wagetype should be 1000 but it is coming as Rs 500
What we have do suggest please
Thanks
Mahantesh

Hi
Amount whatever it is calculating is taking in to account the Loss of pay days is correct.
Problem is when we transfer the employee in between the payroll period while we getting the payout for the period for the earliest record
Ex Employee 1001 holding Postion X from 01.01.2008, on 15.04.2008 transfered to postion Y.
This employee is getting the payout from 15.04.2008 to 30.04.2008 for tht particular month.
Again in the next month from 01.05.2008 to 31.05.2008 he will get the correct payout
whenever we run action in between the payroll period this problem is coming
Thanks

Difference is not coming correct

Hi guys,
i have two measure a and b
i am doing total by at month level and also a have a calculated column c=a-b
but it is not giving correct result as
a b c
122 123 34 this is total by result.
it should give -1 for c.
so how can i resolve this problem.

Hi,
Create a dummy column [C](drag and drop any column and Rename it into CalumnC) in your report and edit the formula for your columnC
and the do your calculation like IfNull(Tablename.columnA,0) - IfNull(Tablename.ColumnB,0) and
set Aggregation Rule is Server Determined
Thanks,
Balaa...

File read write program output not coming correct

this code is compiling without issues but the output is not what i am expecting .. the contents of delta.txt are as follows
*4014254420*
*2897449776*
*4207405601*
and the output thats coming is
+4014254420+
+40142544204207405601+
+4207405601+
its not reading the 2nd line somehow
import java.awt.FlowLayout;
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
import java.awt.event.ActionListener;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.*;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import javax.swing.*;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class testloop
          static int i;
           static char c;
           static int j = 1;
                static String filename;
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException
try {
     FileReader fmi = new FileReader("delta.txt");
     FileWriter fmo = new FileWriter("Updated.txt");
     BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(fmi);
               String temp=null;
                    do{
                    temp = br.readLine();
                    if(temp.startsWith("*"))
                         String tempc = temp.substring(1);
                         System.out.print(tempc+"\n");
                        long tp = Long.valueOf(tempc);
                         System.out.print(tp);
               else
               fmo.write(temp);
                    }while((temp=br.readLine()) != null);
               fmi.close();
               fmo.close();
               }catch (FileNotFoundException e){ System.out.print("not found");     }
               catch (IOException e){System.out.print("io"+e);
               e.printStackTrace();
    also if i use the following delta.txt
**4014254420*
**2897449776*
**4207405601*
mmm+
i get the output as
+4014254420+
+40142544204207405601+
+4207405601Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException+
at testloop.main(testloop.java:33)*
its not writing the text to the file updated.txt
Edited by: adhiraj on Nov 27, 2007 6:58 AM

You are getting the next line twice.
do{
                    temp = br.readLine();
                    if(temp.startsWith("*"))
                         String tempc = temp.substring(1);
                         System.out.print(tempc+"\n");
                        long tp = Long.valueOf(tempc);
                         System.out.print(tp);
               else
               fmo.write(temp);
                    }while((temp=br.readLine()) != null);You need to change your code around so that you only call
temp=br.readLine();once per iteration of the loop.

Report output not coming correctly

Hi All,
my query is like
select 'gggohpoopiokoljmkjjg@@@@@' record from dual;
where record string's length is more than 2000 characters.
I am using oracle report for this purpose as i have some other validations associated with it.
i am printing the report output in a flat file.i want ALL THE OUTPUT SHOULD COME IN ONE LINE.
but this is not happenning so...for the string lengths more than 1000 it's coming in diff line.
How can i make sure that my output file WILL BE IN SINGLE LINE.
i tried in unix vi editor i can give 3000 charecters but it doesn't go to the second line.
any help on this issue will be helpful
thanks in advance

If there's no easy way to do it, you may use a "special character", like chr(xx), as your long line delimiter to chop a line into a couple of lines. Then you write a very simple C program to post-process the report output file to remove these "special character".
If all characters are possible in your report file, you may use a string as the delimiter.

Uploaded Bootstrap based site onto BC and not working correctly using IE8

Having a problem with a Bootstrap based site that I've uploaded to a BC test site. Seems OK when viewed by everything except IE8. I have all the usual IE8 workarounds in and these work correctly on my usual external server and local host but not on BC test site . Will this resolve itself when the site goes live ?

Version 2 is fine to work with, it's a well designed structure. Version 3 uses some new CSS (some style name changes and new styles replacing others). The IE8 issue could be related to a new base styles. Before you do anything check/compare the paths or the CSS and JS between versions.
Maybe test Bootstrap 3 without any javascript, and just a very basic layout of a header, a few columns and a footer. If the IE8 issue persists, try removing CSS style tags until it breaks or resolves. Of course it may break first, so create a custom CSS file and copy the styles you want to test into that, then you can look at editing the custom copy until it resolves or breaks (don't edit the original Bootstrap CSS file as you custom CSS can override it providing you place it in the page header after the main CSS). There's a good chance you'll find the problem.
Also see:
http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/#migration
Message was edited by: Simon Darby

Data is not coming correctly through delta from DSO to Cube

HI All,
When there is change in Org. Unit, Job or any characteristic of employee then the the delta of data source picks that change records.
I have used DSO before Cube. Now in DSO active table have one record against the Employee and same Schedule hours as ECC have.
But while loading to the cube, this data of schedule hours will get added to existing schedule hours of Cube , which makes the schedule hours double for that Employee. For exmaple.
DSO Data.
Emp NO.     Date Org. Unit     Sch. Hrs
1                    ABC                              16
CUBE Data
Emp NO.     Org. Unit     Sch. Hrs
1                    ABC               16
Now Employee Org. Unit get changed to XYZ.
DSO Data.
Emp NO.     Org. Unit     Sch. Hrs
1                    XYZ               16
CUBE Data
Emp NO.     Org. Unit     Sch. Hrs
1                    ABC               16
1                    XYZ               16
I need data as it is in the DSO.
Please help, thanks in advance.
Arvind

Hi Arvind,
DSO and Infocube works different for char values......you can define Key Fields in DSO...
whereas in Infocube each Characteristic value work as Key Field.....that's the reason if there is any change in any characteristic value ...
DSO Active data will not change if Key field has not change..... the newly updated Data field value will be available in DSO Active Table.....whereas in Infocube... it will create a new entry......
In order to get the updated value each time you need to explore some other options .....like complete deletion of Info cube data and full load everyday.......
Other options depends on design and data volume and other parameters.
Hope this helps........
Regards
Mayank

When I use a "customized header" (user-defined field) in a message-filter rule, the rule does not apply correctly.

Hi, I want to distinguish two messages via message filters. One is a duplicate of the other and I want to delete it.
The filter is defined as follows:
- match all of the following
- To or Cc contains %[email protected]
- Return-Path doesn't contain [email protected]
- Perform these actions: Delete Message
I expect that only message 2 (cf. below) is deleted.
However, actually both messages are deleted.
I assume this is a bug with the "customized headers" (here: "Return-Path").
If instead I replace the third line of the filter by "Return-Path contains [email protected]", then both messages are not deleted.
I assume this is also a bug with the "customized headers".
Thanks for checking!
Frank
The following data is a bit scrambled (some chars deleted in each name), hence anonymized.
Message 1 looks like this (only headers shown):
From - Sun Sep 14 16:12:35 2014
X-Account-Key: account1
X-UIDL: 0LqBQa-1Xxp4o3tWC-00dm2v
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: [email protected]
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by mx-ha.gmx.net (mxgmx101) with
ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0LqBQa-1Xxp4o3tWC-00dm2v for <[email protected]>; Sun, 14
Sep 2014 14:39:59 +0200
Received: from d103a3.x-mailer.de ([212.162.15.62]) by mx-ha.gmx.net
(mxgmx011) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0LgMmy-1Y5YJr3foC-00ndfs; Sun, 14 Sep
2014 14:39:55 +0200
Received: from [84.171.158.48] (helo=deborahsvaio)
by d103.x-mailer.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1XT95v-00087S-B1; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:39:55 +0200
From: "Prof. Dr. kamper" <[email protected]>
To: "'Hambug, Frank'" <[email protected]>,
"'sdd MA-L, Aktive'" <aktive%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Schriftzug
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:40:12 +0200
Message-ID: <002e01cfd019$0761bf40$16253dc0$@de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac/Oy/dRV0TPlboMSoegvir2geHMYwBTDdNQ
Content-Language: de
X-Info: valid message
X-Info: original Date
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Envelope-To: <[email protected]>
X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=V3;
X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found)
Message 2 looks like this (only headers shown):
From - Sun Sep 14 16:12:34 2014
X-Account-Key: account1
X-UIDL: 0MKuBs-1XT95v3qgS-0003Ia
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: [email protected]
Received: from d103a3.x-mailer.de ([212.162.15.62]) by mx-ha.gmx.net
(mxgmx011) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0MKuBs-1XT95v3qgS-0003Ia for
<[email protected]>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:39:55 +0200
Received: from [84.171.158.48] (helo=deborahsvaio)
by d103.x-mailer.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1XT95v-00087S-B1; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:39:55 +0200
From: "Prof. Dr. kamper" <[email protected]>
To: "'Hambug, Frank'" <[email protected]>,
"'sdd MA-L, Aktive'" <aktive%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Schriftzug
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:40:12 +0200
Message-ID: <002e01cfd019$0761bf40$16253dc0$@de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac/Oy/dRV0TPlboMSoegvir2geHMYwBTDdNQ
Content-Language: de
X-Info: valid message
X-Info: original Date
Envelope-To: <[email protected]>
X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=V3;
X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found)

Please reffer to PHP section PHP

Customer prices are not coming correctly!!!

Hi Experts,
Question: "Changes made in customer prices in ECC, how it gets replicated to ECO ISA application?".
We have maintained customer specific condition records in ECC. Also, list prices have been maintained in product catalog.
WIth replication of product catalog to TREX, we can see latest list prices in webshop product catalog.
But changes done in customer specific pricing condition records are not appearing in web shop.
Now, If we restart VMC then we can see latest customer prices in web shop. But this is not solution as we cannot restart VMC on every change of customer pricing condition record.
Please explain process on how webshop access customer pricing condition records?
(We know that webshop gets prices with using pricing procedure determination using rfc call, then why it could not able to access correct condition record after change in condition record?).
Please help.
Thank you,
Dhanraj

Dear Friends,
                Thanks for your reply. In copy control from delievery to billing,settings are as follows,
         Pricing type:- G
         Coping requirement:-004
         Data VBRK/VBRP:-007
Users enter prices manually when they prepare sales order.Condition category is empty in condition type.
Looking forward for your reply.
Regard,s
Abhijeet

Witholding tax amount is not coming correct in FBL1N report.

The WHT amount in vendor line item report in column withholding tax is being displayed without a minus(-) sign indicating a debit amount, but this amount is in fact not a debit amount, when this column is sum up it gives incorrect total.
Regards
Abhisekh Mandal

Dear Abhisekh,
SAP note 363309 says,
"Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
from your display variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax' button."
(BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) field is not relavent for
Extended withholding tax and not suppose to use in report FBL1N.
It basically does not make any sense to use the withholding tax fields
of the document line items (BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) with the
activated extended withholding tax.
I'm sorry not to help You further.
Mauri

Pdf file is not coming correctly

Hi,
User came up with an issue as follows:
"PDF invoices in CS language are incorrectly generated, Czech characters are missing. "
Can any one suggest wht can be done.

check doc is converted to perticular language or not..if it is converted then then i think that pertiacular word is not able to convert to the language.
rewards if useful.....
regards
sachhi

Grand Total not coming correctly in Tabular report

Hi,
When I extract in Answers the following information:
Dimension 1
Dimension 2
Dimension 3
Metric 1 (sum)(sum i defined in RPD)
Metric 2 (count distinct)(count is defined in RPD)
When doing this, I get the right result for every value of the dimension, but the total of the summation metric is not correct in tabular report
Can someone help me, please?

Hi,
Try this........
Add this <ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> somewhere inside your <ServerInstance> and </ServerInstance>
on instance config and restart the presentation services.
Cheers,
Aravind

SSD based on ATP rule is not coming correctly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for