Ssl certificate-self-signed certificate

HI Experts,
In my company PCI audit is happening & they found below two issue. what necessarie changes should I done for this.

You can install use a certificate from an external certificate authority (CA) on your ASA (assuming that's where the problem is since you posted in firewall forum). It can be from either an internal CA your company runs or from a commercial CA.
This document is getting pretty old but the basic procedure remains valid.

Similar Messages

  • Two way ssl with self signed certificate?

    How can I use a self signed certificate with two-way SSL with weblogic 7sp4?
    Specfically, I don't want to use any CA authority.
    Is it possible to simply have the clients certificate in the servers truststore or not?
    I pull out the certificate via
    javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate
    but when I use a self signed certificate it's never there.
    If I instead use a certificate that was created with CertGen it works. But CertGen uses the GenCertCA to create the certificate chain.

    How can I use a self signed certificate with two-way SSL with weblogic 7sp4?
    Specfically, I don't want to use any CA authority.
    Is it possible to simply have the clients certificate in the servers truststore or not?
    I pull out the certificate via
    javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate
    but when I use a self signed certificate it's never there.
    If I instead use a certificate that was created with CertGen it works. But CertGen uses the GenCertCA to create the certificate chain.

  • How do I override self-signed certificate old ssl blocking.

    My hard drive failed and was replaced by my desktop support team. As a result, I had to re-install FireFox, my preferred browser to provide console connections to my production servers. These connections are old, firmware platforms that are not updatable behind multiple firewall layers. They use old versions of ssl and self signed certificates. Your new browser simply blocks access. Without the ability to override permanently this 'feature', I am unable to access the consoles of servers doing billions of dollars in business. I have a work-around in place with other browsers.

    So, you are saying that EVERY time I need to access this type of server on my own internal network that is not visible anywhere, I have to go thru this rigamarole of this add on thing, because YOU have decided I can no longer access my own servers in my own network? If there is no permanent fix, I will find another browser that will do the job, and this will be uninstalled across the enterprise, because it becomes very unusable in crisis situations and even during a normal workday, because of the unnecessarily complicated process that has to be done each time. Unbelievable gall. I am speechless. Sure glad I discovered it when it was not urgent. I am sure glad you all are smarter than I am. Sheesh.

  • How to successfully import ASA self-signed certificate?

    On ASA 9.1 i am trying to export an Identity certificate, self-signed certificate into p12 file so i can import it into laptop and used it for secure connection to ASA over ASDM. I can add certificate OK using ASDM, certificate show up OK in Certificate management/dentity certificate. Exported certificate into .p12 file with passphrase OK.
    In Win XP and Windows 7 every time i try to import certificate i got message that password is incorrect. Yes, i did type correct password.
    Even thru cli i got the same error when trying to import the file.
    ASA(config)# crypto ca export ASDM_TRUSTPOINT pkcs12 password
    Exported pkcs12 follows:
    -----BEGIN PKCS12-----
    MIIHPwIBAzCCBvkGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCBuoEggbmMIIG4jCCBt4GCSqGSIb3DQEH
    BqCCBs8wggbLAgEAMIIGxAYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBsGCiqGSIb3DQEMAQMwDQQItd0L
    7e5QezkgxXzmCJKpv3GqQV5/tfk66ySnBMCGrMzsQKBa32wzHYcSerSEePNXzudJ
    Frdyc3ETMXECvO83gujQZLyJ9DfPaDy4gZHwEs9fwGqpJel/NTwUo16dtzO2Vbko
    1kc8kd
    -----END PKCS12-----
    Any tips or tricks how to get this simple task completted? Is maybe file format not right?

    Hi
    Please show the error ASA is reporting during import.
    It's working correctly with 9.1(0)2, example:
    ASA9(config)# crypto ca trustpoint TP
    ASA9(config-ca-trustpoint)# enrollment self
    ASA9(config)# crypto ca enroll TP
    WARNING: Trustpoint TP has already enrolled and has
    a device cert issued to it.
    If you successfully re-enroll this trustpoint,
    the existing certificate will be replaced.
    Do you want to continue with re-enrollment? [yes/no]: yes
    % The fully-qualified domain name in the certificate will be: ASA9
    % Include the device serial number in the subject name? [yes/no]: yes
    Generate Self-Signed Certificate? [yes/no]: yes
    ASA9(config)#
    ASA9(config)# crypto ca export TP pkcs12 123456
    Exported pkcs12 follows:
    -----BEGIN PKCS12-----
    MIIGHwIBAzCCBdkGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCBcoEggXGMIIFwjCCBb4GCSqGSIb3DQEH
    BqCCBa8wggWrAgEAMIIFpAYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBsGCiqGSIb3DQEMAQMwDQQIp8j1
    +5Rh9TQCAQGAggV4DUlYOI+VlGxuCXiGnDTYx+cR5XjPca7KW7L50D5lLQQHLr+U
    fV+QVEaELnQ1MKsMm87zl9AuycuI9EeOJnPTF9Ddxy32ODzaZ4/3BaXnHl2ETyzM
    IohydDJCfscT0r2TPNlE8XSknDfftK+3g3Aa0Gi+Nsq1+NXxTdYcfdXpZHvD9tk0
    QZInQy1UG+NhCERyOe6SIbynuCBfksk9g+rRjeNW4bTNRDpCJ1DnrtpN6BCq8VGN
    QMQagUZ1ONNLaFtQegd17RxWzXUZiWQgqf0jUZnr/BJQI9bPrISkA+JnysNU3MvS
    WVKKfyGQcsYD4ExH+wi6xkohKi7hj80s9cFOyq+xpXjikZw9gKMcpoY2lLs4ivIl
    4x9bB3EQ3xYW5nxbORwDx5xEyYLMUNkVRvC14ts+RB2QcEAXwq2JaaNuO6aBvjhj
    8mpHjXR+wkxV8Mm+UYEed2f1SuzjtZ966OPYW0YkmXGTH+wt/rxbCROAqnmh6HGz
    pU4H5/yhHgBIJOd6vZaKf5XlnX17wSniM+JRw4FsArVpuNOZFeCkDsHHFP6TPYII
    h2aS2jBEH2KW0KuzEP0rHOJ8WVjZgVucSu0pb+vVGw3MzsBl14CnL5kZcPe+81wJ
    XnFibhkucyo9arO/kcc7OtMcAuoktGfBVb1jrX6Se/SY8GFrzYbikNuT4DI4/dw+
    OinRXOX7S/Bhaefx4JSFYoL/7agD7f+kwzv7qAEyIQtjxoGgYuqY2lZVsbZL05dJ
    0D3xDkSDOc9H/5M5nZqP/xwnqVMoREPvt/a+ZdGezfzApUYUH/VAU4NzST44QcvM
    mdeeizpj0VwA7WdZOrMaJll927NGb1RikmtE+6ITgdiksuJVOeNWcXuq00sDAxvZ
    fv7tOQxgWX0+LNKaFd1Ef7PF9KqsJLQnbC28GC9GBNExcc9Pm+Kqfq6qj7HEosHt
    kPSfLFs0kkQQzq+G4xH6pzKQkG7Yt3xjLblI9IdWsCvuHLl8fgN0LHpVXPi9iftW
    PqGG8f9dCymAqHKFEnZzOiCcNlKKG+ddAN7Qb4mGVBYsaeROvVWBL2aAzIDpL7Uv
    8rFHsJVKk/yCruuNSDjmbbaTlYxb2iglo2MkgGsCO5X7fOPTCO3C+UikFyOi6/7c
    fSyn+LE6Za76kdRn4V2FHGG767nBxFBR/bB+uzngR+w/GzIgHQahpJ2xJlKumS2M
    yiy3kGYDhIN+WV6Lz91YwZpSobk1qrcn/7fzl2FFaY6+3+AgAXiOeVL7DyPHqm3N
    gX1EGBzwqeN9h7BeaTJvebhrvtLDU97UnPeyyFZTiSQWZhhRjqsr5mI69NvDybkq
    Db1Rx/Awnqg72RtnwOPxGNlTlRMUK7PjQNW6Kc2F7iy0byyNab9BEO6DNIN8RtXS
    WyioVOdFrFXIYPYnuvoPp46remUaaI4B4428cS7YfWHP5pq0j0PUj0gZnJM7aM0c
    VTHkVp2eZVSBFd9/Tv1q7+2tM5PhRE8ZCKcIIqJq2UJm4+HcIXGCgpIlfW3jL4t7
    qmkfu0ClnHgmoSJBycPxTPaU38FQk2ZmYcnV2RAZxtwL51q5WhAvXi0amATF2h6h
    FtcAP+Iq4Xx8s+wkcaK4I/puK0+wmMyslESWhq3RfB73BKyT9/J4FONliyAQP+4M
    JKkvkMAPx7Do6fqItHhbRR4FxQXg+al21UTLZ9aaY7PGjuqMZ40JY175qPG7CJFn
    bEOfHQGZjLbmqJfJByG6U5mQBoLr4XzTYPrtvErV/TrTGPK4RVATXgnQ/re7TD/G
    p0klPQcDHBkbnAuMVt88Q4QlqZKAov8ofLZr8IvlKsfmPFTFpfqCQCIMa1uGo6P9
    v8zGHGyvZwsOXwB1vMKAfpINCR0wPTAhMAkGBSsOAwIaBQAEFJb8DGrkwS6ApBkL
    0TXZXRY3WGx3BBSBXw+QkTTFm7BL+FS1KoeOupwmowICBAA=
    -----END PKCS12-----
    ASA9(config)#
    ASA9(config)#
    ASA9(config)# no crypto ca trustpoint TP
    WARNING: Removing an enrolled trustpoint will destroy all
    certificates received from the related Certificate Authority.
    Are you sure you want to do this? [yes/no]: yes
    ASA9(config)# crypto key zeroize rsa
    WARNING: All RSA keys will be removed.
    WARNING: All device digital certificates issued using these keys will also be removed.
    Do you really want to remove these keys? [yes/no]: yes
    ASA9(config)# crypto ca trustpoint TP2
    ASA9(config)# crypto ca import TP2 pkcs12 123456
    Enter the base 64 encoded pkcs12.
    End with the word "quit" on a line by itself:
    MIIGHwIBAzCCBdkGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCBcoEggXGMIIFwjCCBb4GCSqGSIb3DQEH
    BqCCBa8wggWrAgEAMIIFpAYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBsGCiqGSIb3DQEMAQMwDQQIp8j1
    +5Rh9TQCAQGAggV4DUlYOI+VlGxuCXiGnDTYx+cR5XjPca7KW7L50D5lLQQHLr+U
    fV+QVEaELnQ1MKsMm87zl9AuycuI9EeOJnPTF9Ddxy32ODzaZ4/3BaXnHl2ETyzM
    IohydDJCfscT0r2TPNlE8XSknDfftK+3g3Aa0Gi+Nsq1+NXxTdYcfdXpZHvD9tk0
    QZInQy1UG+NhCERyOe6SIbynuCBfksk9g+rRjeNW4bTNRDpCJ1DnrtpN6BCq8VGN
    QMQagUZ1ONNLaFtQegd17RxWzXUZiWQgqf0jUZnr/BJQI9bPrISkA+JnysNU3MvS
    WVKKfyGQcsYD4ExH+wi6xkohKi7hj80s9cFOyq+xpXjikZw9gKMcpoY2lLs4ivIl
    4x9bB3EQ3xYW5nxbORwDx5xEyYLMUNkVRvC14ts+RB2QcEAXwq2JaaNuO6aBvjhj
    8mpHjXR+wkxV8Mm+UYEed2f1SuzjtZ966OPYW0YkmXGTH+wt/rxbCROAqnmh6HGz
    pU4H5/yhHgBIJOd6vZaKf5XlnX17wSniM+JRw4FsArVpuNOZFeCkDsHHFP6TPYII
    h2aS2jBEH2KW0KuzEP0rHOJ8WVjZgVucSu0pb+vVGw3MzsBl14CnL5kZcPe+81wJ
    XnFibhkucyo9arO/kcc7OtMcAuoktGfBVb1jrX6Se/SY8GFrzYbikNuT4DI4/dw+
    OinRXOX7S/Bhaefx4JSFYoL/7agD7f+kwzv7qAEyIQtjxoGgYuqY2lZVsbZL05dJ
    0D3xDkSDOc9H/5M5nZqP/xwnqVMoREPvt/a+ZdGezfzApUYUH/VAU4NzST44QcvM
    mdeeizpj0VwA7WdZOrMaJll927NGb1RikmtE+6ITgdiksuJVOeNWcXuq00sDAxvZ
    fv7tOQxgWX0+LNKaFd1Ef7PF9KqsJLQnbC28GC9GBNExcc9Pm+Kqfq6qj7HEosHt
    kPSfLFs0kkQQzq+G4xH6pzKQkG7Yt3xjLblI9IdWsCvuHLl8fgN0LHpVXPi9iftW
    PqGG8f9dCymAqHKFEnZzOiCcNlKKG+ddAN7Qb4mGVBYsaeROvVWBL2aAzIDpL7Uv
    8rFHsJVKk/yCruuNSDjmbbaTlYxb2iglo2MkgGsCO5X7fOPTCO3C+UikFyOi6/7c
    fSyn+LE6Za76kdRn4V2FHGG767nBxFBR/bB+uzngR+w/GzIgHQahpJ2xJlKumS2M
    yiy3kGYDhIN+WV6Lz91YwZpSobk1qrcn/7fzl2FFaY6+3+AgAXiOeVL7DyPHqm3N
    gX1EGBzwqeN9h7BeaTJvebhrvtLDU97UnPeyyFZTiSQWZhhRjqsr5mI69NvDybkq
    Db1Rx/Awnqg72RtnwOPxGNlTlRMUK7PjQNW6Kc2F7iy0byyNab9BEO6DNIN8RtXS
    WyioVOdFrFXIYPYnuvoPp46remUaaI4B4428cS7YfWHP5pq0j0PUj0gZnJM7aM0c
    VTHkVp2eZVSBFd9/Tv1q7+2tM5PhRE8ZCKcIIqJq2UJm4+HcIXGCgpIlfW3jL4t7
    qmkfu0ClnHgmoSJBycPxTPaU38FQk2ZmYcnV2RAZxtwL51q5WhAvXi0amATF2h6h
    FtcAP+Iq4Xx8s+wkcaK4I/puK0+wmMyslESWhq3RfB73BKyT9/J4FONliyAQP+4M
    JKkvkMAPx7Do6fqItHhbRR4FxQXg+al21UTLZ9aaY7PGjuqMZ40JY175qPG7CJFn
    bEOfHQGZjLbmqJfJByG6U5mQBoLr4XzTYPrtvErV/TrTGPK4RVATXgnQ/re7TD/G
    p0klPQcDHBkbnAuMVt88Q4QlqZKAov8ofLZr8IvlKsfmPFTFpfqCQCIMa1uGo6P9
    v8zGHGyvZwsOXwB1vMKAfpINCR0wPTAhMAkGBSsOAwIaBQAEFJb8DGrkwS6ApBkL
    0TXZXRY3WGx3BBSBXw+QkTTFm7BL+FS1KoeOupwmowICBAA=
    quit
    INFO: Import PKCS12 operation completed successfully
    ASA9(config)#
    ASA9(config)# sh crypto ca certificates
    Certificate
      Status: Available
      Certificate Serial Number: 6e85f150
      Certificate Usage: General Purpose
      Public Key Type: RSA (1024 bits)
      Signature Algorithm: SHA1 with RSA Encryption
      Issuer Name:
        hostname=ASA9+serialNumber=123456789AB
      Subject Name:
        hostname=ASA9+serialNumber=123456789AB
      Validity Date:
        start date: 15:52:01 UTC Jan 12 2013
        end   date: 15:52:01 UTC Jan 10 2023
      Associated Trustpoints: TP2
    You might want to enable debugs: "debug crypto ca 255".
    Be carefull when typing password - watch out for trailing space !
    Michal

  • SSL (Self Signed Certificate) in Business Connector

    After going through hundreds of messages, I am still not clear  about the steps involved in including SSL certificate with HTTP protocol.
    1. Instead of subscribing to Trusted Certificate Authority, can we ceate a Self Signed Certificate? If yes, how?
    2. Can anyone please explain the steps involved in including SSL certificate (configuring/importing the certificate)? We are successfully calling HTTP and sending the XML document to a HTTPS URL with authorized user name and password. I need to include SSL certificate to complete the requirement. I have looked at all the PDF documents that are available with BC installation and looked at many forums and still haven't found the answers.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Ramesh.
    When untrusted root certificates may be acceptable
    Some CAs may be trusted, but in only a very limited way. For example, a company with employees in diverse
    locations can make internal documents available to all its employees by setting up a Web site on an intranet that
    is only accessible from inside the corporate LAN (i.e. people on the Internet cannot see it). If there are
    documents on this site that should have limited access within the company (such as strategic plans or personnel
    documents), then these can be protected with SSL.
    Since both the servers as well as the browsers are on corporate-controlled equipment, it is well within the
    companyu2019s interests to act as its own CA. This means that the company can generate its own root certificate
    with which it can sign as many SSL certificates as required for the servers deployed in its intranet. Once this is
    done, this certificate should be installed into the certificate stores of all the browsers used in the company. Since
    the computers these browsers run on are controlled by the company, this is easy to do: the corporate IT
    department can have a policy that the companyu2019s root certificate is installed in the browseru2019s certificate store
    whenever a new computer is set up. This prevents security warnings from being displayed whenever an
    employee accesses an SSL-secured site on the company intranet.
    The advantage to the company is that it can deploy secured sites anywhere on its intranet without purchasing
    certificates from an external CA. Note that if the company also runs an e-commerce site, then it should purchase
    its SSL certificate from a trusted CA and not use an internal one for sites accessible to the public, who will not
    have the certificate installed by the corporate IT department, and thus would receive a security warning.
    In such an environment, an unscrupulous employee (most likely a member of the IT team) who has access to
    the private key could launch very successful MITM attacks against employees who visit SSL-protected ecommerce
    and e-banking sites at work. This will be discussed later in this document. However, the company
    can easily protect itself by warning employees not to visit such sites on company time or equipment, since they
    are not u201Cbusiness related activities.u201D
    Please see this doc related to trusted and untrusted certificate.
    http://www.sericontech.com/Downloads/Untrusted_Root_Certificates_Considered_Harmful.pdf

  • Why, when I successfully connect to Server 2012 Essentials R2 via Anywhere Access does the Remote Desktop Connection use the self signed certificate for RDP instead of the SSL certificate I installed when I set up access anywhere?

    Scenario:
    Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials
    I purchased an SSL Cert from GoDaddy and I managed (after some challenges) to set up Anywhere access to use that new SSL Cert. I to rebooted the server and I am able to login to Anywhere Access vis https (using the SSL certificate) from PC, Mac and iOS.
    So far so good.
    The problem I am having is that when I click to launch a remote desktop connection to the server RDP connection wants to use the self signed SSL certificate of the server rather than the SSL Certificate I installed into Anywhere Access. As a result, I get
    a security warning like this: "The identity of the remote computer cannot be verified. Do you want to connect anyway?"
    The name in the certificate appears as ACME-SERVER.ACMEDOMAIN.local  instead of the SSL Certificate I installed, which is
    remote.acmedomain.com
    If I lick to accept, RDP does work fine, it;s just using a self signed certificate. I want it to use the trusted certificate that I purchased and installed.
    My guess is that there must be an additional step to tell Anywhere Access that when it generates the RDP session that it should use the cert? OR, is this just how it works?

    Because....
    the server does not have a 'trusted' certificate assigned to it.
    Only the RDP Gateway has the trusted certificate for the external name.
    If you want to remove that error, you have to do one of the following:
    Make sure your domain uses a public top level domaim, and get a public trusted certificate for your server.
    So, something like,
    server.domain.publicdomain.com
    Or,
    Install that certificate on your remote computer so it is trusted.
    Robert Pearman SBS MVP
    itauthority.co.uk |
    Title(Required)
    Facebook |
    Twitter |
    Linked in |
    Google+

  • Safari 7 on OSX 10.9 not enjoying SSL self signed certificates

    Hello people from the web,
    I am experiencing a weird issue with self signed certificates. Since I upgraded to OSX 10.9 (Maverick) I am not able to connect to an HTTPS site protected by a self signed SSL certificate. The only remaining browser on my computer able to do the trick is Firefox (24). Chrome (30) and Safari (7) cannot.
    Have you experienced the same issue? Have you found a solution?
    On my quest for a solution I found this article:
    http://curl.haxx.se/mail/archive-2013-10/0036.html
    However it seems to me this is more the webkit common engine causing the issue. Is it possible that Webkit has become more picky with SSL Certificates? In which case how to generate a cutom one that would suit Safari 7 and Chrome 30+?
    Thank you for any help you could provide
    Oscar

    Safari - Unsupported third-party add-ons may cause Safari to unexpectedly quit or have performance issues
    Safari/other browsers – Website not loading
    Safari Problems

  • How to erase all self signed certificates and force Server to use Signed SSL

    I have been using a poorly managed combination of self-signed SSL certificates and a free one. I have purchased a good SSL from Digicert and am trying to configure the server to use it across the board. All of the services seem to be using it, but when I try to manage the server remotely, I seeing a self-signed certificate instead.
    I look under the system keychain in K-Access and there are several self signed certificates there (including the one that I am seeing when I try to remote manage).
    Can I replace those self-signed certs with the new one some how?

    Don't delete those.  However, you are on the right track.  Follow these steps to resolve.
    1:  Launch Keychain Access
    2:  Select the System Keychain
    3:  Find the com.apple.servermgrd IDENTITY PREFERENCE (looks like a contact card) and double click to open it
    4:  In the Preferred Certificate popup, change com.apple.servermgrd to your purchased certificate
    5:  Press Save Changes to save.
    6:  Reboot the server or kill the servermgrd process to restart the service.
    That should resolve your issue.
    R-
    Apple Consultants Network
    Apple Professional Services
    Author "Mavericks Server – Foundation Services" :: Exclusively available on the iBooks store

  • ACS 5.3 / Self Signed / Certificate base auth

    Hello,
    Our ACS (5.3) has self signed certificate, we have exported it and declared it in Certificate Authorities.
    We have exported it to have a Trusted Certificate for client machine.
    This certificat has been installed on a laptop.
    The wlc is successfully setup for eap (peap & eap-fast has been tested > ok)
    I have this error in the log:
    12514 EAP-TLS failed SSL/TLS handshake because of an unknown CA in  the client certificates chain
    I think the Access Policies (identity & authorization) are misconfigured:
    > I allowed Host Lookup, PAP/ASCII, MSCHAPV2, EAP-MD5, EAP-TLS, PEAP, EAP-FAST
    > Identity: System:EAPauthentication match EAP-TLS
    id Source: AD in which AD, Internal Users, Password based, certificate based CN Username are enabled
    > authorization: System:WasMachineAuthenticated=True
    Thanks for your help,
    regards,

    Hello,
    I found the answer here:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/1298039#1298039
    ACS self-signed certificate is not compatible with EAP-TLS
    Thanks,

  • How to replace an expiring self-signed certificate?

    Well, I've successfully (I THINK) replaced two of the three certificates that are expiring.
    First off - 90% of what's in the Security manual concerning certificates is useless to this issue. I don't want to know how the watch is made - I just want to tell time! In fact there is a GLARING typo on Page 167 of the Snow Leopard Server Security Configuration Manual showing a screenshot of the Certificate Assistant in Server Admin that is just plain wrong!
    It's clear there is no way to RENEW the certificate. You have to delete the old one and replace it with a new certificate.
    The issue I have is that with all the services using the certificate, I don't know what the impact to the end-users is going to be when I delete that expiring certificate.
    It appears that a certificate is created automatically when the OS is installed, although I installed the OS Server on a virtual machine and I didn't see where it got created, nor was I given any input during the creation (like extending the expiration date).
    I don't know whether those certificates are critical to the running of the OS or not, but I went through the process of creating a new certificate in Server Admin. I deleted the expiring certificate. Because the two servers on which the expiring certificate was deleted does not have any services running that require a certificate (such as SSL on my mail server), nothing bad seems to have happened or been impacted negatively.
    I did, however, name the new certificate the exact same thing as the old certificate and tried to make sure that the parameters of the new certificate were at least as extensive as the old certificate. You can look at the details of the old certficate to see what they were.
    Here's the "critical" area of the certificate that was "auto-created" on my virtual server. (It's the same as the one on my "real" server.
    http://screencast.com/t/zlVyR2Hsc
    Note the "Public Key Info" for "Key Usage": Encrypt, Verify, Derive. Note the "Key Usage" Extension is marked CRITICAL and it's usage is "Digital Signature, Data Encipherment, Key Cert Sign". Extended Key Usage is also critical and it's purpose is Server Authentication.
    Here's a screenshot of the default certificate that's created if you create a new self-signed certificate in Server Admin:
    http://screencast.com/t/54c2BUJuXO2
    Note the differences between the two certificates. It LOOKS to me like the second certificate would be more expansive than the default issued at OS Install? Although I don't really care about Apple iChat Encryption.
    Be aware that creating certificates starts to populate your server Keychain.
    http://screencast.com/t/JjLb4YkAM
    It appears that when you start to delete certificates, it leaves behind private keys.
    http://screencast.com/t/XD9zO3n16z
    If you delete these keys you get a message warning you about the end of the world if you delete private keys. I'm sorry if your world melts around you, but I'm going to delete them from my Keychain.
    OK, now I'm going to try to create a certificate that is similar to the one that is created at start-up.
    In Server Admin, highlight your server on the sidebar and click the "Certificates" tab in the icon bar.
    Click the "+" button under your existing certificate and select "Create a Certificate Identity". (This is how I created the default certificate we just got through looking at except I clicked through all the defaults.)
    Bypass "Introduction".
    In the "Create Your Certificate" window I set the "Name" as exactly the same as the name of the expiring certificate. I'm HOPING when I do this for my email server, I won't have to go into the services using the certificate and select the new one. On the other hand, naming it the same as the old one could screw things up - I guess I'll know when I do it later this week.
    The "Certificate Type" defaults to "SSL Server" and I think this is OK since that's what I'll be using this certificate for.
    You HAVE to check the "Let me override defaults" if you want to, for example, extend the expiry period. So that's what I want to do, so I checked it.
    In the next window you set the Serial Number and Validity Period. Don't try typing "9999" (for an infinite certificate) in the "Validity Period" field. Won't work - but you CAN type in 1826 (5 years) - that works - Go Figure!??? You can type in a bigger number than that but I thought 5 years was good for me.
    The next part (Key Usage Extension) is where it gets sticky. OF COURSE there is NO DOCUMENTATION on what these parameters mean of how to select what to choose.
    (OK here's what one of the "explanations" says: "Select this when the certificate's public key is used for encrypting a key for any purpose. Key encipherment is used for key transport and key wrapping (or key management), blah, blah, blah, blah, blah blah!") I'm sure that's a clear as day to you rocket scientists out there, but for idiot teachers like me - it's meaningless.
    Pant, pant...
    The next window asks for an email address and location information - this appears to be optional.
    Key Pair Information window is OK w/ 2048 bits and RSA Algorithm - that appears to be the same as the original certificate.
    Key Usage Extension window
    Here's where it gets interesting...
    I brought up the screenshot of the OS Install created certificate to guide me through these next couple of windows.
    Since the expiring cert had "Digital Signature, Data Encipherment, Key Cert Sign" I selected "Signature, Data Encipherment and Certificate Signing".
    Extended Key Usage Extension...
    Hoo Boy...Well, this is critical. But under "Capabilities" it lists ANY then more stuff. Wouldn't you THINK that "ANY" would include the other stuff? Apparently not..."Learn More"?
    Sorry, folks, I just HAVE to show you the help for this window...
    +*The Extended Key Usage Extension (EKU) is much like the Key Usage Extension (KUE), except that EKU values are defined in terms of "purpose" (for example, signing OCSP responses, identifying an SSL client, and so on.), and are easily extensible.  EKU is defined with object identifiers called OIDs.  If the EKU extension is omitted, all operations are potentially valid.*+
    KILL ME NOW!!!
    OK (holding my nose) here I go...Well, I need SSL Server Authentication (I THINK), I guess the other stuff that's checked is OK. So...click "Continue".
    Basic Constraints Extension...
    Well, there is no mention of that on the original certificate, so leave it unchecked.
    Subject Alternate Name Extension...
    Nothing about that in the original certificate, so I'm going to UNCHECK that box (is your world melting yet?)
    DONE!!!! Let's see what the heck we got!
    http://screencast.com/t/QgU86suCiQH
    Well, I don't know about you but that looks pretty close for Jazz?
    I got some extra crap in there but the stuff from the original cert is all there.
    Think we're OK??
    Out with the old certificate (delete).
    Oh oh - extra private key - but which is the extra one? Well, I guess I'll just keep it.
    http://screencast.com/t/bydMfhXcBFDH
    Oh yeah...one more thing in KeyChain Access...
    See the red "X" on the certificate? You can get rid of that by double clicking on the certificate and expanding the "Trust" link.
    http://screencast.com/t/GdZfxBkHrea
    Select "Always Trust".
    I don't know if that does anything other than get rid of the Red "X", but it looks nice. There seem to be plenty of certificates in the Keychain which aren't trusted so maybe it's unnecessary.
    I've done this on both my file server and my "test" server. So far...no problems. Thursday I'll go through this for my Mail server which uses SSL. I'm thinking I should keep the name the same and not replace the certificates in the iCal and Mail service which use it and see what happens. If worse comes to worse, I may need to recreate the certificate with a different name and select the new certificate in the two services that use it.
    Look...I don't know if this helps anyone, but at least I'm trying to figure this idiocy out. At least if I screw up you can see where it was and, hopefully, avoid it yourself.
    If you want to see my rant on Apple's worthless documentation, it's here.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2613095&tstart=0

    to add to countryschool and john orban's experiences:
    using the + Create a Certificate Identity button in Server Admin is the same thing as running KeyChain Access and selecting Certificate Assistant from the app menu, and choosing Create a Certificate. Note that you don't need to create a Certificate Authority first.
    in the second "extended key usage extension" dialog box, i UN-checked Any, PKINIT Server Authentication, and iChat Encryption. this produced the closest match to the server's default self-installed certificate.
    when updating trust settings in Keychain Access, the best match to the original cert are custom settings - set Always Trust for only SSL and X.509 Basic Policy.
    supposedly you can use Replace With Signed or Renewed certificate button from Server Admin and avoid needing to re-assign to services. however i was unable to get this to work because my new cert didn't match the private key of the old. for those interested in going further, i did figure out the following which might be helpful:
    you can't drag and drop a cert from Keychain Access or Cert Manager. you need the actual PEM file. supposedly you can hold down the option button while dragging, but this didn't work for me. however you can view the certificates directly in etc/certificates. but that folder is hidden by default. a useful shortcut is to use Finder / Go To Folder, and type in "/private/etc/certificates"
    now, on my system the modification date was the same for old and new certificates. why? because it seems to be set by when you last viewed them. so how do you know which is which? answer: compare file name to SHA1 Fingerprint at bottom of certificate details.
    after you delete the old certificate, it will disappear in Keychain Access from "System" keychains. however in "login" keychains the old one will still be there but the new one won't. it seems to make sense to delete the old one from here and add the new one. somebody tell me if this is a bad idea. the + button does not work easily for this, you need to drag and drop from the etc/certificates folder.
    lastly, the "common name" field is the server/host name the client will try to match to. you can use wildcard for this, e.g. *.example.com. if you need to, you can use the Subject Alternate Name to provide an alternative name to match to, in which case the common name field will be ignored, which is why by default the dNSName alternate field defaults to the common name. more info here: http://www.digicert.com/subject-alternative-name-compatibility.htm.
    maybe that's hopeful to somebody. but i stopped there since things seem to be working.
    last note, which you probably know already - if you don't want to bother installing the certificate in your client computers and phones, you can select Details when the first trust warning pops up and select Always Trust.
    now, we'll see how everything works once people start really using it...

  • ASA self-signed certificate for Anyconnect 3.1, which attributes?

    Hi everybody,
    I can't find the detailed information which attributes are exactly needed for the Anyconnect 3.1 client to correctly identify the VPN server -ASA 8.4(4)1
    I have added two servers in the client connection profile:
    IP address, primary protocol IPsec
    IP address/non-default port number, primary protocol SSL
    Connecting via IPsec only issues a warning about "untrusted source" (I didn't import the certificate as trusted, but that's not the issue)
    Connecting via SSL issues an additional warning "Certificate does not match the server name".
    The self-signed certificate (created with ASDM) includes the IP address as DN cn, additionally as alternate identity "IP address". I have exported the certificate and parsed it with openssl (after re-encoding to PKCS#12 DER) and apparently no attributes are included.
    I would like to give it a try with certtool and openssl to generate a self-signed certificate which is accepted by the Anconnect 3.1, where can I find a detailed description, which attributes are required for Anyconnect SSL sessions? I'm convinced the identity (DN cn) is OK.

    Shamelessly bumping this question,
    Anyone out there (maybe from Cisco) who can tell us, which atttributes are required on a self signed certificate?
    I keep getting "Certificate does not match the Server Name" for SSL-VPN, IPsec-VPN is fine for the same server.

  • Importing self-signed certificate

    Hi there!
    I have some problems in importing SSL certificates on my macbook.
    There are 2 certificates that needs to be imported: the root CA certificate, which is self-signed naturally and private user certificate, which is signed by above-mentioned CA.
    The first file in .crt format, which is consists of CA public key and sign. The second file in .p12 format, which is consists of encrypted public and private keys.
    The problem is:
    I can't import nor CA neither my personal certificate.
    The CA cert should be imported at "CA" tab in keychain, but the import button ("+") is inaccesible here:
    http://img.200133883.info/big//%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%8F%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D0%BB %D1%8E%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%B9-20120313-143521.png
    When I tried to double-click CA.crt I got the import error # -67762 which saying that attribute "key length" was invalid. The same thing with my personal certificate.
    Could somebody explain me, how should I import those two SSL certificated?

    I'm using self-signed certificate from SBS. Right now it's not the question, if something is misconfigured within my certificate (I'm aware of SBS certificate problems), the problem is that E90 WILL NOT recognize .cer or .der files as certificates.
    There must be someone, who can answer this really simple question, which certificate formates are supported on E90.
    You will find this type of question posted many times on different forums, with diiferent suggestion, but they simply don't work.
    Again my error is "file format not supported"

  • Lion server erased self signed certificate

    Help!!! I accidentally deleted the self signed certificate that had the right keys for my third party SSL.  Now I cannot replace the self signed certificate with the new SSL.  Now what????

    I will begin my answer by making an emphasis that the best way to protect your data in-transit is using a 2048 bit certificate signed by a trusted certificate authority (CA) instead of relying on the self-signed certificate created by SQL Server.
     Please remember that the self-signed certificate created by SQL Server usage for data in-transit protection was designed as a mitigation against passive traffic sniffers that could potentially obtain SQL Server credentials being transmitted
    in cleartext, but nothing more. Think of it as a mitigation against a casual adversary.
     The self-signed certificate usage was not intended to replace real data in-transit protection using a certificate signed by a trusted CA and encrypting the whole communication channel. Remember, if it is self-signed, it is trivial to spoof.
    After making this clarification, the self-signed certificate generated by SQL Server uses a 1024 bit key, but that size may be subject to change in future versions of the product. Once again, I would like to strongly discourage relying on the self-signed
    certificate created by SQL Server for data in transit transmission.
    BTW. Azure SQL Database uses a 2048 certificate issued by a valid certificate authority.
    I hope this information helps,
    -Raul Garcia
     SQL Server Security
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • RV120W- How to create new unique self-signed certificate?

    Hello,
    how to create new unique self-signed certificate on RV120W? I can create request for singning by external CA, but I cannot create new unique self-signed certificate itself. Any idea? Did I miss something? Many thanks!
    Abudef

    So basically RV120W does not support self-signed certificate? It only allows to generate private key and certificate signin request. There is no chance to replace default generic ssl/vpn certifice within router itself? Could you please give me an advice, how to sign that request by some "CA"? I mean no commercial CA, I need something free running under Windows os. Many thanks!

  • Use self signed certificate

    Hi,
    I have got a theoretical question: Is it right to use self-signed certificate in production environment?
    We don't want to use this cert. for authentication but for SSL decryption. Is this a good solution?
    Thanks!
    V.

    Hi Rick,
    May be I was not completely clear in my wordings :)
    VPN connection is not a mandate. The VPN connection already existed between our organization and the provider service (instead of going over the internet) and hence the security person in our organization was fine with us using self signed certificates.
    I gave you a scenario where the use of self signed certs was authorized. And also once more scenario where using self signed certs in test environments is not allowed.
    Two contrasting thoughts, so basically it is up to the perception of the security people to assess the risk and give a go ahead.
    Personally I feel that if the communication channel is secure between the systems (2 way ssl) then using self signed certs for message encryption might be fine.
    If the channel is not secured (may be even 1 way SSL), I would prefer using CA certified certs.
    Hope I make more sense now :)
    Thanks,
    Patrick

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creative Livecam Vista IM - software problem (WebCam Center)

    Hello, I've just had my camera installed with all the software included. There's one problem - every time I open the WebCam Center, the program tries to install something called "Photo Gallery". However, it's impossible to install that, because some

  • JDBC ojdbc6.jar problem with passing parameters for PreparedStatements.

    The JDBC Driver being used in ojdbc6.jar. I am using this driver because I of its compatibility with Java 6 which is on my machine The database I am connecting to is 10.2 (10g) Oracle database. The connection works fine its the parsing of the SQL que

  • Can't open Norton vault when clicked(shows as open)

    Running Firefox 33.1.1 and Windows 7. I had this problem previously in other versions of Firefox and changed to Chrome because nobody could come up with a fix. Would like to run Firefox again but it is irritating to always have to exit Firefox and re

  • Time machine restore.  Applications missing

    Upgraded my MacBook hard drive. Full restore from Time Machine. All OK with no error messages. But all Applications are missing. Dock aliases are all question marks.

  • Oracle 9i x Oracle 8i

    Can I use Oracle Streams to integrate Oracle Database 8.1.7 version with Oracle Database 9i version? I mean, is Oracle Streams a product found only in 9i release? The same question above I do for Oracle 9i AS Integration.... Can somebody help me?