SSPR - Unlock User - No policy grants the Requestor permission to complete all changes.

When trying to unlock a user in FIM Portal I get the below error with FIM Admin account.
Error processing your request: The operation was rejected because of access control policies.
Reason: The operation failed as a result of insufficient access rights.
Attributes: GateData
Correlation Id: eda9f21c-a777-4ef2-b12f-25e82aef7973
Request Id: 
Details: No policy grants the Requestor permission to complete all changes.
Any ideas?

You need to update the MPR for Administration: Administrators can read and update Users and under the Target Resources tab, add the Attribute GateData in the Attributes Box.
If you are doing this through the Sync Engine, also do the same in the MPR
Synchronization: Synchronization account controls users
it synchronizes
That should solve the problem.
You need to do this for all the attributes you get the error for. FIM does not give all the attributes that it fails with insufficient rights, it fails at the first attribute, so once you have solved this attribute there may be others generating the same
error. So watchout for that Attributes: GateData it may change, so any attribute that fails you need to follow the above streps.

Similar Messages

  • FIM R2 SP1 MPR changes giving me "No policy grants the Requestor permission to complete all changes" no matter what I do

    I am implementing FIM R2 SP1 on win 2012 servers and migrating FIM 2010 RTM configurations to the new environment.  Some of the custom Sets, MPRs etc did not import correctly into the new portal and when I try to manually add a set or
    alter an MPR I recieve the following error
    Error processing your request: The operation was rejected because of access control policies.
    Reason: The operation failed as a result of insufficient access rights.
    Attributes: ActionParameter,ActionType
    Correlation Id: 11a13390-6a1f-4776-a796-fd0f05101120
    Request Id:
    Details: No policy grants the Requestor permission to complete all changes.
    I have tried enabling "all attributes" in "Administration: Administrators control set resources" and "Administration: Administrators control management policy rule resources" and recieved the same errors.  I am logged in
    as the user who installed the portal and it is a member of the administartors set.
    What am I missing?  Any ideas welcome please.

    Hi Peter,
    I found the import had not completely imported the configuration while trying to import the configuration (as I said above) and while trying to troubleshoot this issue I discovered this error.
    I have tried importing the old database and this does not help.
    I should mention that the configuration is coming from the production environment into a stand-alone development environment for testing.
    I have, today, in an attempt to resolve this error, uninstalled the portal and service (which are installed on the same server) and reinstalled it creating a new database.  This is to attempt to resolve any "overwritten" default sets or MPRs
    as you have suggested.
    I thought I would try out the FIM 2010 R2 Service and Portal configuration Backup Tool described here
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134311(v=ws.10).aspx but note there is no instructions for their use in restoring the environment.  I assume you just copy the
    files to the appropriate place, run the reg keys and sql scripts that it creates and that does it all for you?  I was hoping that this might be a successful alternative to the old Import-FIMconfig way of doing things.

  • I am a PC user now adjusting to the iMac. How can I change the font setting so that every app is the same font...larger than what is currently showing?

    I am new to th imac, having used a PC all of my life. I would like to set the text size for all applications, is this possible?

    You can only do that globally by changing the screen resolution. In OS X it is on an application by application basis, if you can change it at all. For instance, for finder windows choose  View menu > Show view options. In Text Edit in Preferences > New Document. Mail > Format > Show Fonts but this is only for messages text.
    In short, Apple wants you to live with what you've got and dosen't make it easy to change any fonts except the ones you use to compose.

  • How long does the VI take to complete all tasks ?

    Hello,
    Just wondering if there is a way to find out how much time (in milliseconds or micro-seconds) does a VI take to complete the whole process (when there is no time-delay).
    Regards,
    Awais
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Awais,
    search the forum for "measure execution time" to find threads like this...
    Best regards,
    GerdW
    CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
    Kudos are welcome

  • Grant the Essbase application permission to user in Shared Services

    Hi,
    We got a problem in granting the Essbase permission to user using Shared Services. We are using Hyperion 9.3.1.
    (1) We created an Essbase application + database through Essbase Administration Console, say TBC.Sales.
    (2) Provision the Essbase "Server Access" + Essbase Application "Read" roles to a user.
    (3) In Essbase Admin Console, we "Refresh Security from Shared Services".
    However, the user still cannot see the Essbase Database in SmartView. Does anyone know how to fix the problem?

    The problem is fixed with Essbase 9.3.1.3.0.5.

  • OU Group Policy over-riding User Group Policy

    I'm using ZfD 4.01 ir7 and have a restrictive Group Policy applied at the
    OU level. I've created a less restrictive Group Policy and assigned it to
    a user within the above mentioned OU but the settings are not
    taking...the OU Group Policy is over-riding the user Group Policy. The
    appropriate rights have been assigned and this configuration is working
    for other users/OUs in the tree. I've run a dsrepair against this
    partition and no errors were reported.
    Any suggestions to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
    Ryan

    Paulr,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
    - Check all of the other support tools and options available at http://support.novell.com in both the "free product support" and "paid product support" drop down boxes.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://support.novell.com/forums/

  • The execute permission was denied

    Hi we are running ssis packages from Integration server, we got this error. Please review the error message and tell me how to troubleshoot this issue.
    Thanks
    DBA

    Hi DBA,
    Just as the error message said ”The EXECUTE permission was denied on the object ‘HyperonExtract_Current’, database ‘xxxx’, schema ‘hyp’.”, the current use does not have permission to execute on the object ‘HyperonExtract_Current’, database ‘xxxx’, schema
    ‘hyp’.
    To fix this issue, please grant the execute permission to the user with the query below:
    USE xxxx;
    GRANT EXEC ON hyp.HyperonExtract_Current TO user
    References:
    GRANT System Object Permissions (Transact-SQL)
    The EXECUTE permission was denied on the object ‘sp_start_job’, database ‘msdb’, schema ‘dbo’.
    Thanks,
    Katherine Xiong
    Katherine Xiong
    TechNet Community Support

  • Sales order as complete and change the delivery status.

    Hello All,
    We  produces an order but then the customer calls and does not want the material so we in turn will scrap the material against the production order using transaction MB1A mvmt type 951 E. 
    Since the material were scrapped and no material were shipped against the sales order, the sales order u201Coverall statusu201D remains open and the delivery status is u201Cnot deliveredu201D.
    To close the order  we u201CRejected line itemu201D and moved on.
    I would like to know if there is another way we can set the sales order as complete and change the delivery status. 
    Regards
    Amit

    Hello,
    you can use the status profile for the same. but a better way would still be to use the rejection reasons . the rejectionr reasons are very well integrated with the document flow as well as transfer of requreiemnts to Production
    so a best practise would be to use rejection reason
    hope this helps
    Thanks
    akasha

  • The user '*' preference item in the 'User - 6th Form Students Policy {E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}' Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070003 The system cannot find the path specified.' This error was suppres

    I am looking at an issue with users not getting specific group policies. 
    After searching a number of client computers I found that the following error
    The user '*' preference item in the 'User - 6th Form Students Policy {E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}' Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070003 The system cannot find the path specified.' This error was suppressed.
    I can find the folder in the Sysvol folder on all of the domain controllers. 
    The issue with end users seems to be that the proxy settings for internet explorer is not being applied. 
    Potential problems?
    one folder in sysvol entry is empty 
    \\<server>\SYSVOL\<domain.name>\Policies\{E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}\User\microsoft\IEAK\LOCK
    or is this our issue
    The old method of configuring proxy settings  to Internet Explorer 9 has changed?
    https://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2530309?wa=wsignin1.0 
    http://thommck.wordpress.com/2013/11/08/the-new-way-to-configure-internet-explorer-proxy-settings-with-group-policy/

    Hi all 
    In administering this policy I am a little confused. 
    We have a policy that distributes proxy settings in the internet explorer maintenance settings section - however when opening this policy up in GPO editor the internet explorer maintenance section is not present.
    I plan to apply the settings via User/preferences/control panel settings/ internet settings (or registry settings from article) however I am unable to edit the settings for internet explorer maintenance and these will persist. Ideas????

  • How to run the the impersonation permission grant command for multiple users

    I have run below command earlier to grant the impersonation for a user called user1
    get-mailbox -identity user1 | add-adpermission -user domainname\service application user -ExtendedRights ms-Exch-EPI-May-Impersonate
    Now I want to run this command for multiple users like user2, user3, user 4 together. How should I run the command.
    This is for Exchange Server 2007 SP2
    Abhijeet M. Mohite

    Hi Abhijeet
    get-mailbox -identity user1 | add-adpermission -user domainname\service application user -ExtendedRights ms-Exch-EPI-May-Impersonate
    I am little bit confused with this command so can you please help me what to right inplace of User1 and domainname\service application user
    Example: I wanted to give Impersonate rights to
    [email protected] then can you please complete command for me.      Thanks in advance.
    Warm Regards, Pramod Kumar Singh Manager-IT

  • I have a Win7Pro SP1 PC locked down with a Group Policy as it is a public facing PC. PDF fillable forms cannot be completed when logged on as the restricted user. The forms work as a normal user. What are the user requirements/permissions needed to fill f

    I have a Win7Pro SP1 PC locked down with a Group Policy as it is a public facing PC. PDF fillable forms cannot be completed when logged on as the restricted user. The forms work as a normal user. What are the user requirements/permissions needed to fill forms?

    Well, try this (I was able to fix my with these steps):
    Go Utilities > Disk Utility
    Select your Startup Disk, e.g. Macintosh HD
    Then, under the First Aid Tab, click Verify Disk Permissions.
    If there are errors, then click repair Disk Permissions.
    After it is done, restart the computer and see if your problem is resolved.
    I hope this help.
    Zeke
    www.ZekeYuen.com/blog/

  • The current user username has not been granted the ADVISOR privilege despite having it !

    Hi,
    I'm trying to follow ML note 2499931.1 'Using Dbms_Advisor.Tune_Mview To Optimize Materialized Views For Fast Refresh' and am receiving an error suggesting the user4 does Not have the Advisor privilege
    despite the fact that it does. What am I missing ?
    Every note I've found so far suggests granting the privilege is the fix.
    I have and continue to receive the error.
    Version 11.2.0.3 on Redhat 5
    select * from dba_sys_privs where grantee = 'SOAUSER';
    GRANTEE                        PRIVILEGE                                ADM
    SOAUSER                        CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW                 NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE VIEW                              NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM                    NO
    SOAUSER                        SELECT ANY DICTIONARY                    NO
    SOAUSER                        ON COMMIT REFRESH                        NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE ANY DIRECTORY                     NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE DATABASE LINK                     NO
    SOAUSER                        SELECT ANY TABLE                         NO
    SOAUSER                        ADVISOR                                  NO
    SOAUSER                        UNLIMITED TABLESPACE                     NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE SESSION                           NO
    Error at line 2
    ORA-13616: The current user SOAUSER has not been granted the ADVISOR privilege.
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.PRVT_ADVISOR", line 4869
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", line 1969
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.PRVT_TUNE_MVIEW", line 490
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.PRVT_TUNE_MVIEW", line 970
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", line 739
    ORA-06512: at line 3
    Thanks in Advance
    Ken

    Sorry, but the code I was receiving the error message for is essentially   the same as the example in the note. Assumed people would have access to the note.
    The statement is:
    variable foo varchar2(20);
    declare foo varchar2(20) := 'ken_foo';
    begin
    dbms_advisor.tune_mview(:foo,
    'create materialized view ken_foo
    as
    select 
    papf.rowid R_papf,
    paaf.rowid R_paaf,
    gcc.rowid R_gcc,
    papf.employee_number,
    gcc.segment4 cost_center
    from hr.per_all_people_f@atc_pp_to_ebs_atcllc papf,
         hr.per_all_assignments_f@atc_pp_to_ebs_atcllc paaf,
         gl.gl_code_combinations@atc_pp_to_ebs_atcllc gcc
    where papf.person_id = paaf.person_id
    --and trunc(sysdate) between papf.effective_start_date and papf.effective_end_date
    --and trunc(sysdate) between paaf.effective_start_date and paaf.effective_end_date
    and paaf.default_code_comb_id = gcc.code_combination_id');
    end;
    Per another forum the answer appears to be that sys didn’t have the advisor privilege.
    Granted advisor to sys and ran the statement again as soauser and no error.
    Thanks
    Ken

  • Group policy - restricted groups. How to specify a -local- user as member of the administrators group in group policy

    Hi
    With restricted groups I can specify the end user -domain- accounts that are members of the local administrators group on domain PCs. But - I need a particular LOCAL account on all the machines to keep its membership of the local administrators group for testing reasons. At the moment restricted groups is striping this local account of its admin access.
    Is it possible to specify a -local- computer account as admin on all the PCs via group policy or it can only be done with domain accounts?
    thanks

    You are asking for local accounts to be managed via "Restricted Groups".
    Yes, it is possible.
    Rajesh showed you one way with domain groups. In his version "Administrators" group will only contain those accounts
    that are specified in the GPO, no manually added accounts. This is not always desired.
    If you wish to have an account (group or user, local or domain) to be added to "Administrators" group while keeping all the other
    members, proceed like this:
    - create the local account on the client(s)
    - in the GPO select "Add Group" in "Restricted Groups".
    - type in the name of the local account, e.g. "TestID"
    - in the appearing dialogue choose "This group is a member of" => Add
    - type in "Administrators"
    Link the GPO and that's all.
    The original MS description for "Restricted Groups".is here:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/279301/en-us
    Another nice one here:
    http://www.frickelsoft.net/blog/?p=13
    Besides that, a great solution to manage local accouts is GP Preference Extension "Local Users and Groups".
    You can simply create a "Local Users and Groups" Item (computer or user based) and specify the needed options.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731972.aspx
    Of course you need some prerequisites (at least one Vista or Winows 2008 for management and the GPP CSE on each target machine).
    If you are new to GPP, these links will help you to get into it:
    http://www.microsoft.com/DOWNLOADS/details.aspx?familyid=42E30E3F-6F01-4610-9D6E-F6E0FB7A0790&displaylang=en
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943729/en-us
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732027.aspx
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731892(WS.10).aspx
    Patrick

  • After migrating a windows 7 machine using ADMT Group policy shows the the computer is from the new domain but user is from old domain

    We have migrated machines using ADMT tool but we have found some window 7 machines Group policy issues.  We see that the computer GP is getting from the new domain but the users profile still has the old domain GP information.  Any help on
    removing the old GP objects and forcing the new domain User policy would be great.  We have tried the basic troubleshooting gpupdate /force reboot etc.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Sorry for the delayed response.
    First, please verify whether these domain users you mentioned belong to old domain or new domain.
    If they belong to old domain the GP is right with no problem. If they belong to new, try following suggestions.
    Please test these steps in one of the problematic computer. If it worked, then go on for others.
    To avoid unexpected problems, please backup your register keys before following steps:
    Open regedit.exe, and delete following keys:
    HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft Key (looks like a folder).
    HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft Key.
    HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Group Policy Objects Key.
    HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies key
    Exit the registry and restart.
    Note: HKLM = HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE & HKCU = HKEY_CURRENT_USER
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here
    Keep post.
    Kate Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Logon failure; the user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer (IE App)

    Hello,
    Question of a newbie:
    In Windows Server 2012 I'm using IE10 to simulate numerous different users. But for some of these "fake" users I got the error:
    Logon failure; the user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer.
    So I opened PowerShell : GPEDIT.MSC
    Computer Configuration / Windows Settings / Security Settings / Local Policies / User Rights Assignment.
    In the detail zone : Double-Clic sur Allow log on locally.
    Dialog box : Allow log on locally properties
    But the Add User or Group
    button is grayed out!
    What can I do?
    Thanks for your help!

    Several months after...
    I found the solution : the user has to be member of the Server
    Operators in Active Directory. 
    That's all :)
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for