Standard Asset Report considering Down Payment Differently

Hi
I am executing a report S_ALR_87011964 it gives a out put including a asset which has been acquired in current month and for which 50% down payment has been paid. Another report based on FS10N for that asset executed output excludes that asset for which 50% down payment has been done. Why output of both the report is different and exactly to the amount of down payment I am confused with the logic of both report is it any other way to consider asset for which some down payment has been done.
Thanks

Hi,
The FI report FS10N only shows balances, no down payments.
However, the asset balance sheet report S_ALR_87011964 in asset accounting does show these type of payments on the asset. The logic of these reports are not the same and therefore should not be compared.
I hope this clarifies.
Kind regards,
Brigitte

Similar Messages

DOWN PAYMENT REQUEST - asset number on down payment request.

Concerning this request, you must know that we should use a 'dummy asset number' because down payments are not depreciable.
With this dummy asset number (which is not depreciable); we have to :
-validate the down payment request
- generate the automatic payment, with the right dummy asset number.
Right now, the program takes the down payment of the purchase order but not the dummy one.
Does someone have already handle with this case ? The difficulty is to manage with the automatic payment run. Is still existing a BTE ?

Hi,
Create an AUC asset master and try to post down payment to that asset.
Thanks,
Srinu

Standard Asset report - INVNR (Inventory field) requirred

Hi Guys
Is it possible to get inventory field (INVNR) in standard asset reports. I dont want to use dynamic selection in any standard report.
That means in a standard asset report i need one more column for inventory name for every assets
Warm Regards
Bala

Bala,
Yes, it is very much possible. Create a new sort version in OAVI and select the filed INVNR from the talbe ANLAV.Using this version while you execute the report and call in this field from the change layout.
Thanks
Jagdish

Standard Report for Down Payment Requests of Milestone Billing

Hi Experts,
Is there any Standard SAP Report for Downpayment Requests of Milestone Billing. Where I can view all the downpayment requests for the customers in Milestone Billing Scenario.
I have searched but I'm getting report for Vendors downpayment requests in transaction code FBL1N.
Kindly help to get me this report.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Avinash

Hello,
you can use transaction VF04 to get the list of the downpayment requests to be made, and VF05N for the list of downpayment requests already made (using the proper SD invoice document as selection criteria): this is from an SD point of view.
From an FI point of view transaction FBL5N could help you. Also F-29, as already mentioned, since it provides the list of downpayments to be cleared for a customer.
Best regards,
Andrea

Vendor ageing report for down payment bucketwise

Hi
I have paid many downpayment to various vendors. Now i want the ageing report for the same (i.e. bucket wise i.e. 0-30 days, 31-60 days and so on).
This i am getting for vendor invoices in TCode: S_ALR_87012085 (Vendor payment history with OI sorted list).
Please let me know if the bucketwise report is possible for the downpayment too.

Hi,
Vendor ageing for down payments as well as invoice i use to see from T.code FBL1N by creating layouts.
Choose Arreas after net due date from layout and for that column you can apply a rule that from 0 to Lessthan or equal to 30.
Like that you can create the layouts. In FBL1N you can give this layout (down) so information come in that format.
The one disadvantage is that you have to select manually the layouts and you can see only one ageing information at a time.
Regards,
Sankar

Asset PO with Down Payment Adjustment

While doing asset PO ie we have raised a PO then given advance using PO reference in F-48 for the asset, Later on we do the MIRO & F-54.
But when i go & view FBL1N it shows the Vendor Cr line item of MIRO document not cleared (Red Button ) and also the Vendor Debit Line item of F-54 document also not cleared. now i have to goto F-44 to clear it manually.
My doubt is why do i have to do this extra step in F-44, When i have already done F-54. Shud not it get cleared by itself.
Kindly guide me.....
Regards,
R.Ramakrishnaraj

Hi,
While doing F-54 you might not have selected properly, otherwise it will clear in this transaction itself.
Sarma BH

Down Payment Posting in Assets Under Construction

Hi
In case of AuC, when we post the down payment, the standard Accounting entry created is:
Vendor Advance A/c Dr
Asset Under Construction (Down Payment) Dr
     To Bank A/c
     To Asset Clearing A/c
When we Post the invoice , the A/c entry passed is
Asset under Construction A/c Dr
      To vendor A/c Cr
When we clear the down payment against the invoice
Vendor A/c Dr
Asset Clearing A/c Dr
     To Vendor Advance A/c
     To Asset under Construction (Down Payment)
My issue is:
1. Why the Asset account should be involved for making down payments? At the time of down payments, the accounting entry that should be passed by the system showuld be
Vendor A/c Dr
    To Bank A/c
2. What happens in the case of year end activities? Why does system create two entries for current assets?
regards
Sanil Bhandari

na

Down Payment for Assets Purchase Order and depreciation

I have created one purchase order for assets now when i am making down payment against purchase order it pick up asset and post down payment correctly without depreciation. But when i am clearing down payment against the vendor invoice it is reversing downpayment in asset explorer [AW01N] with Transaction Type 180 and calculating depreciation on reversal amount. I am using down payment spl G/l indicate "M" even i tried with "A".
Can anyone tell me why it is reversing depreciation on downpayment cleared against invoice when original down payment is not calculating depreciation.

Hi,
As per as my knowledge is concerned, you should treat the cost element as " Category 90 " , this is a balance sheet account.
Please check at your end.
Thanks
Dasa

Down payment request for asset-based Purchase order

Please Help!
I have a PO for an Asset for 10000$. down payment need to be paid for $5000.
I went to f-47 to create down payment request BASED ON PO and there is no field to put the PO number.
What am i missing? Is there config need to be done? or anyting on the PO need to be checked?

Hi
Look for 'Purch. Doc.' field. If not, check the field status in OBC4 and OB41
Thank You,

Asset Down Payment for AUC

Hi,
I am having a query in Asset Down Payment for AUC
I have configured for both Acquisition: down payments and Down-payments clearing account in 'AO90' in asset module.
But I am still not clear why Down-payments clearing account account needs to be configured.
The entry I am getting are
1. F-47 DP request - I enter the Asset number here. Noted item.
2. F-48 -DP- an entry is created as follows:
Vendor     Dr     1000
Bank     Cr     1000
Acquisition: down payments     Dr     1000
Down-payments clearing account     Cr     1000
3. Now the Down-payments clearing account shows a credit balance all the time.
How should this be rectified
rgds
Vidhya

Hi Vidya,
Option 1: When you follow based on your example, ie., asset debited during down payment entry, asset entry will be reversed when you adjust down payment against invoice.
Option 2: Down payment request and down payment made against AUC asset with reference to Purchase order:
With reference to PO: Please refer sap note number 310368 valuated goods receipt paragraph and they have clearly mentioned about making down payments against asset/AUC purchase order without getting debited to asset account.
You have to make F5 378 message number to be a warning message instead of error message and you have to suppress asset related settings in OB41 posting keys 29 and 39. Posting key 39 is useful when you have down payment request.
If you have done this, then it will show only warning message during down payment that "purchase order is related to asset" and it will not be debited to asset account. Also after following the above steps, it is not necessary for you to give Acquisition: down payments G/L and Down payment clearing G/L in AO90 transaction code.
Hope this helps. Assign points if useful.
Regards,
Dwarak.

Difference between standard SAP asset report and BW report

Hi
We are finding differences between the standard Asset report and the BW report which is extracted via standard SAP extractor. Could anyone guess what would be the reason for this?? I ran the report - AW01N
Please revert at once as this is very urgent.
Regards,
prasad

Hi Prasad,
A number of reasons could be responsible for this. Check the following:
1. If some posting were done in R/3 just before running your BW report, you may have to re-extract the data into BW as this would no longer be current. The thumb rule is to always allow at least 45 minutes to 1 hour between when the last transaction in R/3 was posted before re-extraction. This is to allow SAP Logical Unit of Work(LUW) to have been committed to the R/3 database.
2. There may have been some restrictions on the selection variables in the BW query. Check the Query Designer, just to be sure there are no restrictions.
I hope the above help.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob

Down payment for AUC error

hello Gurus.
we want to down payment against asset Purchase order using F-48.
during Simulate the Document we get the following error.
Account 26318501 is not a reconciliation account
Message no. AU138
Diagnosis
Processing terminated because account 26318501 (determined from account symbol KTANZA in chart of accounts YAIN) is not specified as a reconciliation account for assets.
Procedure
Define the account as a reconciliation account or assign a different account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
the account 26318501 is Reconciliation accounts. still system generate the error.
how I resolved this issue.
I am waiting your reply.
regards,
riten patel

Hello Atif Farooq .
I have get two error.
if I made changes to recon account type to Asset then
during Down payment using F-48, system gives me error during the entry that
"Account 26318501 is not a reconciliation account for account type K
Message no. F5017
Diagnosis
The account 26318501 is to be used as a reconciliation account for the desired special G/L transaction. However, the account was not defined as a reconciliation account for account type K in the company code-specific part of the master record.
Procedure
If the account number is correct, change the master record of the account. If the account number is incorrect, determine via Customizing which account is to be used. The specification is made in table T074."
and if I made changes to recon account type to vendor then ,
system gives me error during Simulation that
Account 26318501 is not a reconciliation account
Message no. AU138
Diagnosis
Processing terminated because account 26318501 (determined from account symbol KTANZA in chart of accounts YAIN) is not specified as a reconciliation account for assets.
Procedure
Define the account as a reconciliation account or assign a different account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
Please help me to solve this problem.
I am waiting your reply.
regards,
riten patel

Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments:CJ88

Hi Experts,
When I settle WBS Element cost to the Asset Under Construction using transaction CJ88, I receive following error.
AA571 Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
Please help.
Thank You.

Hi,
first please check if the message AA 571 is right:
- Please check table ANLC. If ANLC-KANZA + ANLC-ANSAZ < 0 AA 571
- Check asset values (AW01N, ANEP, ANLC) and find out where the negative down payments come from (tty 180, 181)
However, in some cases a negative down payment balance cannot be avoided (for example through translation differences in foreign currency areas). This is the problem of AA 571. Sometimes it is not justified. For this
cases we have the following note:
860038 Error AA571 not justified
Using SM30, for the T100S table, create an entry for the message
class AA, message number 571, allowed message type "AEW" and
standard message type "E". Select the entry as 'Switch off'.
If when you post to a fixed asset the down payments are negative, or
become negative through the posting, you continue to receive an error as
a default with these changes.
Recommended procedure:
o Change this message to a warning message for one or several
 special users. This user should then be used to post to any such
 fixed asset that has down payments that are already negative or
 become negative through posting.
o This should only be permitted in the cases where a negative down
 payment balance cannot be avoided due to foreign currency
 rounding.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Feb 11, 2011 9:27 AM

Down Payments & Delivery relevant invoice

Hi!
The problem is to create a down payment request to the customer through an SD order (this can be done with billing plan, item category TAO, condition type AZWR, invoice type FAZ) but we want to create the actual invoicing with a delivery relevant invoice and not an order relevant invoice.
I do not see how this is feasible, if it can be done!
Thanks in advance for you reply

I have now a better understanding of your solution.
But then the more "standard" solution of creating down payment through FI (F-37) is about the same, as it is using two different unrelated documents.
What I had in mind was:
1/ Create an order (with delivery block)
2/ Create a down payment request related to this order (VF01)
3/ Cash in the down payment and remove delivery block
4/ Deliver
5/ Create the delivery related invoice. (This invoice would of course then be able to remind customer that a down payment was done, down payment accounting clearing would be also done).
I know, I might be dreaming. But if I am not the only one

F-48 No suitable down payment request exist

Dear All,
I have prepared Down Payment Request document using Tcode -F-47 and generated Document No.
Now i POst Vendor down Payment (F-48) using Document which o have created by F-47 , when i press on Tab " Request", to select Document No. then It's giving error " No suitable down payment requests exist Message no. F5002"
What can be the problem pl suggest me.
Regards
Swati Shah

Hi
according to documentation in SAPNet:
Special G/L Indicators for Down Payments in the Standard System are
Code Down payment type
A General down payment (made or received)
M Down payment made on tangible fixed assets
I Down payment made on intangible fixed assets
V Down payment made on inventory stocks
This documentation is available on SAPNet at:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en
/01/a9c7d0455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
For an example of a docwn payment request posting see:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/
6e/12183e9f0411d189b80000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Please use the appropriate downpayment category, as per system design.
Thanks & Regards
Phaneendra

Standard Asset Report considering Down Payment Differently

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for