Standard Cost Estimate for Subcontracting

Dear Sir / Madam,
We are in the process of migrating from our normal R/3 operations for Production Planning to Execution inclusive of Costing of materials by using iPPE functionality for repetitive scenario. We have our BOMs for painted body currently in R/3. The painted body falls under subcontracting scenario.
In this scenario the body in white produced from our bodyshop is sent out to the subcontractor along with certain paint items and is received as painted body and consumption of the body in white and the paint items sent needs to be shown during the goods receipt of painted body.
For this we have maintained the BOM for the painted body in iPPE. Also in the costing variant "ZD01" in order to arrive at Standard cost (CK11N) for the painted body we have maintained the following settings for Valuation variant for subcontracting :
Priority     Strategy Sequence     
1          Net Quotation Price
2          Effective Price from Purchase Order
While running CK11N for the material (painted body) we are receiving the following message
Message no. 28501 : Error in dependency processing: condition 0000062388 is empty
We wanted to verify whether the message raised is normal or would it have any adverse impact.
Your assistance would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Bhavika
Edited by: Bhavika Goyal on Feb 7, 2009 12:20 PM

Dear All,
Control Key is important for inhouse producrtion and Sub Contract.  Check it once and when ever u have given the Product (semi fisished) to Sub Contractor, along with Paint. 
Here one thing is important what is your process? how much portionis involced in Sub contracting.  why because
Paint issue to the sub con is captured by the way for migo or miro
Payment to sub contract is capture all the cost of the Sub Con., then is there any cost is missed for this process.  Let me know the remain things?
thanqu
raj

Similar Messages

  • Can we use two costing variants for standards cost estimate release.

    Hi,
    We have 2 plants (plant 5100 and plant 5200) under company code 5000.
    We have run standard cost estimate(CK11N) for material 98001000027 at plant 5100 using costing variant ZG01 and at plant 5200 using costing variant ZG02. First, we released  standard cost estimate (CK24) for this materia at plant 5100 and set (in marking allowance) costing variant ZG01 and costing version 01. Next time when we are trying to release the standard cost estimate for the same material for plant 5200, it is automatically picking ZG01 as costing variant in marking allowance and it is not allowing to change the costing variant to ZG02 saying Company code 5000: Release already carried out, cancellation not possible, Message no. CK797.
    Is it possible to use two different costing variants for release of standard cost estimate for a material at two different plants at the same company code? If so how?
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Bijay

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply again.
    What is the benefit of assigning "Single Valuation Variant same to different Plants" ? In costing variant also we can assign maximum only one valuation variant and this valuation variant will default for all the plants, and hence I dont think it is necessary to assign same valuation variant to different plants.
    My  issue is :
    Example: ( Standard Cost Estimate for material 98001000027)
    Plant - 1
    Material Cost                                             Rs.100
    Labour Cost                                               Rs.50
    Overheads (10% of Labour Cost)                  Rs.5
    (say ,through costing sheet - 1)
    Total Standard Cost Estimate                      Rs.155
    Plant - 2
    Material Cost                                             Rs.150
    Labour Cost                                               Rs.100
    Overheads (20% of Labour Cost)                  Rs.20
    (say, through costing sheet - 2)
    Total Standard Cost Estimate                      Rs.270
    Now, Please explain why we cannot have two Standard Cost Estimates for a material at two different plants? If it is possible to have two standard cost estimates for a material at two different plants, how to take care of  overheads (rate of which varies) at two different plants (plant - 1 > 10% and plant- 2>20%) as we can assign maximum one costing sheet to a valuation variant variant?
    How to map the system so as to meet the above requirement?
    Thanks,
    Bijay

  • No standard cost estimate found for the material

    Hi,
    When we are trying to generate the bill systems throws the error as "no statandard cost estimate found" whereas the material is a kmat material.
    Actually as per the requirement we should not Run standard cost estimate for any material,we will update the standard price in MR21
    What are the settings that i need to do  to avoid the above error message while doing billing?
    Following error msg is appearing:-
    No standard cost estimate could be found for material "300000"
    Message no. K/834
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis, an attempt was made while valuating with material costing to read for material "123456" a standard cost estimate released on posting date "02.10.2008".
    The system has discovered that there are no error-free standard cost estimates released in plant "BP01" on the specific date "02.10.2008" for material "123456".
    The material cost estimate is accessed according to the CO-PA Customizing settings for costing key "YG1" under Define Access to Material Costing.
    Display Cost Estimate for Material
    Display Material Cost Estimate without Quantity Structure
    System Response
    It is not possible to process the document further.
    Procedure
    Check your system settings.
    Thanks
    Kishore

    Remove the Costing keys assignment in the step "assign costing keys to any
    characteristics" in COPA Configuration settings.

  • Steps for running the Standard Cost Estimate

    I have a requirement.
    I have created cost sheet, cost component structure, costing variant etc. for running the standard cost estimate for the material. 
    I want a help document for knowing the PP side settings and list of order-wise transactions for calculating the standard cost of the material.
    Regards

    hi neeraj
    pls forward satndard cost estimte document fo my gmail id nsvshiva
    Regards
    shiva

  • Excise Duty - Standard Cost Estimate

    Hi Experts,
    We have defined Excise duty as one of the cost component in the cost component structure.  Can some one explain how this Excise duty is posted as planned values in the Standard Cost Estimate ( For material cost quantity from the BOM and price from Material Master is picked up according to the Valuation Variant - defined strategy - similarly for Excise Duty how the system captures the Value).
    Please Help - thanks in advance.

    Hi
    If your Plant is not in an Excise Free Zone - Then You should not add Excise Duty as a cost component because you will be getting credit for the same
    If your Plant is in an Excise Free Zone - Then your MAP/Planned Price etc must be inclusive of Excise duty.... This is handled by marking the excise condition as Non Deductible
    So, in short, there is no way to show it separate... For Case b, you can use CK74N to add Excise component as Additive cost
    br, Ajay M

  • No release of production order without standard cost estimate

    Hi All,
    I have an requirement, that is production order for a material should not be released or saved if standard cost estimate for that period is not released. Basically it should not allow to release or save the production for that material, is SCE is not run for that period. I tried various options, i also overheard its possible through user exit and many people have succeed in that.
    Has anybody overcome this problem, please do let me know. And which user exit??
    Thanks in advance
    With Best Regards
    GJ.

    Hi...
    I have faced the same problem in my previous project. What i have instructed to my client is to take control of Master data and put the status as "03" Blocked for movement till the statndard cost is released for this material.
    You can relase the status to "E2" in Cross Plant Status Field in Costing one view once the cost estimate is released for the material.
    I hope this works for you.
    Please let me know if you require any fruther information.
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Santosh
    Rewards points if helpful.

  • Issue with Standard Cost estimates / Material Ledger

    Background:
    We have been using SAP for the last 5 years with Material Ledger active. Due to a number of reasons, we have not revised its standard cost estimates from 2001 till now. This means that at month end, we do not mark and release prices as recommended, nor do we mark prices and use dynamic release.
    What Happened:
    A new material called PFSW3 was made. This is a FERT. Before production
    could start my team released the standard cost estimate for this material. Production was now able to proceed without problem. Then, when the time came to sell the material (VF02), SAP again raised the error 'cost estimate not found'. On checking the standard price in MM03, we discovered that the future cost estimate was missing. So we created and marked a new cost estimate in the middle of February 2007.
    Problem:
    When the first sale took place, SAP released the marked cost estimate and posted a Price Change document to adjust for the new standard cost. I understand this was due to dynamic release. Now, when month end came, the system settled all the production orders of material PFSW3 but did not do multi level costing on it.
    Internal Investigation:
    My team has determined that the material PFSW3 has price determination 2 set by mistake. All our other production materials (HALB and FERT) are
    set to price determination 3 in the material master (accounting view).
    Questions:
    To sum this situation up,
    we need to know why the material PFSW3 was not marked closed in its period status (CKM3) at the time of closing through CKMLCP?
    What are the implications of not closing this material in Feb 2007 (current period status is showing 'Quantities and values entered')?
    How can we close this material this month?
    The future cost estimate is again missing for PFSW3 in March 2007 and I
    fear we are going to face more problems as this material is sold to customers.
    Please respond this is an urgent issue.

    Dear Shumyl,
    Please, have a look at Note 645083 - Material period status set to "Closing Entry Completed" that might help to closing your material in previous period.
    Hope it will be useful.
    Regards,
    Flaviano.

  • Raw materials on MAP with split valuation used in standard cost estimate

    We have a few raw materials which are purchased from different vendors and of different brands. We have opened split valuations for these raw materials. These raw materials are later used in manufacture of different finished goods. We use MAP for raw materials and Std. for finished goods. What configuration and processing steps will be required to run standards cost estimate and what will be standard price for a finished good considering the following example:
    Material X is finished good
    Raw Material A with split valuation @ USD 5 (brand aplha)   &   USD  10 (brand beta)
    Raw Material B without split valuation @ USD 1
    It is expected that we used brand aplha 60% of the time and brand beta 40% of the time and production batch size is usually 100 Kg.
    Please reply
    Edited by: Chris SAP on Sep 29, 2011 7:56 AM

    hi chris
    Hope you have configured the material A for split valuation. while calculating standard cost estimate for the material C. through ck11n, the system will pick up the header price from material master.
    But here you are saying that you have chances of using the material A, 60% of brand alpha and 40% brand beta
    Instead of using split valuation use mixed costing concept. create the material A with separate Ids and create two boms one with alpha and the other with beta.
    create procurement alternative in CK91N and mixed ratio with Ck94 and release the mixed cost estimate
    please go through this thread also
    Re: Difference between Split Valuation and Mixed Costing
    Krishna

  • In running standard Cost Estimate, System is selecting wrong selection ID

    We have two Process in Production . one we use Process flow(PI), in other we use Production flow(PP).
    Now, while running standard cost estimate for Process industry(PI) as  it uses recipe instead of Routing...But system is searching/selecting for routing than recipe.
    Our issue is that when i run Cost run for Process orders , it should select Recipe not routing. And  when i do cost run for Production order...it should select Routing!!!
    Kindly help...
    Shivraja

    Verify the Routing determination sequence in costing varinat - Quantity Structure determination configuration.
    Change the Priority for the selection of task lists as below
    ID                  SP               Task           Plan Usage        Description  Status             Description of Status.
    01     1     R     1     Production     4     Released (general)
    01     2     R     1     Production     2     Released for order
    01     3     N     1     Production     4     Released (general)
    01     4     N     1     Production     2     Released for order
    01     5     2     1     Production     4     Released (general)
    01     6     2     1     Production     2     Released for order
    This should work as expected.

  • Standard cost estimate could not be found for the material

    Dear All,
    We have 4 manufacturing plants and 30 sale depots. We are maintaining price control (S) for FG and SFG in Manufacturing plants,price control (V) at depots for the same material code. we are getting an error message " standard cost estimate could not be found for the material" while doing billing at depot.
    Please give me suggestion.
    Your suggestion should be appreciate.
    Thanks in advance............
    AND
    My client want to see profitability at manufacturing plant level and need break up for the COGM. So how can i get the values of depot sales.
    please let me know how to do........

    Hai
    Price control should be S for Depot also. You need to run standard cost estimate in DEPOT after entering additive cost under CK74N for frieght, excise duty etc. To transfer the standard cost from the source plant you  need to make configuration  in OMD9 defining the receiver and sender combination so that system can pick up the cost from source plant. This special produrement type needs to be asigned in the material masters of DEPOT under MRP 2 view.
    Pushkala

  • Can we use two costing variant for standard cost estimate

    Hi,
    Can we use two costing variant for standard cost estimate of two different materials in the same period ? e.g. Costing variant Z001 for Material code 1000 and Costing Variant Z002 for Material code 2000.
    Here the system is not allowing to change the costing variant in Marking Allowance (t code CK24) for marking and release of Material cost 2000 if the standard cost for Material code 1000 is already marked and released.
    Thanks,
    Bijay

    For a material in a period only one price can be released. Though you cn have two separate costing variants and then calculate standard estimate with that. U can release based on one variant only for a month. Or use MR21 and update the price as per the other variant
    Thanks and Regards

  • Error when Create Cost Estimate for Material using CK11

    Dear Experts,
    I have a material ABCD which is FOC parts:-
    1) Procurement type: F
    2) Special procurement type: Z (at first, it was wrongly entered as B. I changed special procurement to Z & the message 'The procurement type of the special procurement type is E' displayed but I still can save & system allowed it).
    3) Standard price is 0.00 as this is FOC.
    Firstly, I run CK11 for material EFGH which is the parent of material ABCD.
    This time, the material ABCD has special procurement type B. I received error messages:
    1) No price could be determined for material ABCD in plant xyz,
    2) Cost component split costed with value of zero,
    3) Cost estimate for material ABCD in plant xyz is incorrect.
    Then, I changed special procurement type for material ABCD from B to Z and run CK11 again. Still the same error occurred.
    Could someone advise me how to run CK11 without errors.
    Thanks in advance!

    I don't know if B and Z are really the name of your special procurement keys or you are just using them as examples.  Either way, the special procurement key is critical for determining how your material is valued.  It is used for such things as stock transfer from other plant, subcontracting, and consignment processes.  Can you tell me how these special proccurement keys are set or what you want to use these keys for.  You can find the configuration for these key under menu path Controlling - Porduct cost controlling - Product cost planning - Material cost estimate with quantity structure - Settings for quantity structure control - Master data - Check special procurement types.
    thanks,

  • Error reading material cost estimate for sales order (KE292)

    Dear All,
    I have an issue with billing. we are posting july month transactions, the material cost is maintained through MR21. When releasing billing document for accounting we are getting error message like"Error reading the material cost estimate for sales order "11"
    Message no. KE292
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate item 000010 of sales order 11 by reading the corresponding product cost estimate.
    However, no product cost estimate could be found for this sales order item.
    The system accessed product costing for product AMLFP011011XX00P using costing key YB3 as defined in the
    CO-PA Customizing settings.
    System Response
    The system cannot process the document any further.
    Procedure
    Check your Customizing settings."
    We cross checked with other client as a current date and we ran cost estimate through CK40N with same material. and we posted entries. Here it is working fine. but in above process it is not working. Can you pls guide me where i missed.
    Regards,
    Nagaraju,

    Hi,
    When the Costing Key is assigned to the material types in the COPA customizing, then system expects Cost estimation when billing is released to Accounts.
    If you dont run cost estimation but update the material master through MR21, system will not accept as in the Costing key configuration you must have selected the Current Standard price field for the valuation.
    Hence, try to run cost estimation and then do releasing.
    Thanks & Regards
    Ravi Kumar

  • Recursive Loop Error while doing standard cost estimate

    SAP Gurus,
    We are trying to do standard cost estimate on a material and we are getting error because it is going in recursive loop even though we have used "recursive allowed" indicator for item components in the BOM. The error message numbers are CK 730 and CK 740. We are using 4.6c. I have tried the same scenario in ECC 6.0 and still I get the same problem.
    Below is my BOM structure:
    Material 10890345 (has low-level code 012)
            ---> 10867220 (has low-level code 013) and has recursive allowed indicator
    10867220
            ---> 10846733  (has low-level code 014) and has recursive allowed indicator
    10846733
            ---> 10890345 (has low-level code 012) and has recursive allowed indicator
    According to me, the BOM for material 10846733 is causing the problem.
    For some weird reason while doing the costing run for material 10890345, it s not stopping and going in a loop.10890345  and 10846733 should ideally have the same low-level code as they are recursive.
    Please help to provide some solutions at the earliest on how to avoid recursive loop during costing.
    Regards,
    Swapnil

    Dear,
    I have 2 things to shear with you.
    The method we followed to solve the iteration is as below
    1.Config change -
    Valuation variant in the costing variant, we changed the sequence as below
    material valuation
    4 planned price 1
    2 std price
    3 Mov ave price
    2. Material master change
    made all the semi finished goods and finished goods
    procurement type = E,
    costing with qty structure,
    Enter the planned price1
    By doing this what happens is
    when system first start the iteration, takes the planned price 1 and start iterating and next time in the second iteration it takes the calculated price from qty structure till it finds the difference between the value calculated is less than .001. Then it gives the result
    Why lot size is important is, in our case in some levels the usage is very less compared to the first material header qty and system used to stop in between  and not even reaching the last level as during the cycle it was reaching less .001 difference. may be in your case it may not be the case...just check
    Please come back after trying this. this was the only last option i had to solve the issue in my client.
    Another alternative is to have a different material for costing purpose to stop the iteration which i will not recommend as we need to do some calculation for each stage and input the cost of dummy material in each stage.
    My client is happy with the result as the difference between manual calculation and system calculation is less then .1%...this is because SAP will not consider the difference beyond .001, but in excel you get as many as decimals you want.

  • Blocking creation of production order if standard cost estimate is not done

    Hi PP gurus,
    Can anyone help me in blocking the creation of production order if the standard cost estimate is not done for the particular posting period.

    Hi,
    I do not think there exist a standart check. You can use exit EXIT_SAPLCOZF_003 to block creation of production order by sending error messages based on any condition.
    Regards.

Maybe you are looking for