Standard Profile--

How dowe add the standard profile for example :S_A.ADMIN into a role ? Or do we Directly assign it ?

I dont have any desire to assign that !! but there is an agent that runs on the system whose documentation tells that the agent will not work else...
So the plan is I give them this profiel on the Sandbox...runt the trace and then develop the role

Similar Messages

  • Why does the Adobe Standard profile make a mess of old NEF files?

    Recently I've been reprocessing some old NEF files taken with the Nikon D50 camera years ago, and I was startled to find that the Adobe Standard camera profile does a bad job on them: the photos come out muddy-looking, really unacceptable, with too much yellow and magenta. I can fix the problem by choosing the Camera Standard profile, which gives acceptable results. However, I believe that Adobe Standard is generally recommended by Adobe, and I wonder what the problem is here. Does anyone know?
    I currently use a Nikon D7000, and Adobe Standard seems to work well enough with that camera.
    Later: After checking and comparing more carefully, I think that perhaps I prefer Camera Standard with the D7000 too. Adobe Standard is certainly acceptable with the D7000, but Camera Standard gives blue skies of clearer blue, and less exaggerated reds. So the best fix for me is probably to make Camera Standard my default for all cameras.
    Looking around the Web, I see various people complaining about too much magenta with Adobe Standard, although other people are happy with it.
    Message was edited by: Jonathan Palfrey

    Yammer P, thanks for the input.  I have been working with the DNG Profile Editor since the first version was available.  I also started using the Passport software when it was first available.  I first worked on a profile for the D200 and after many attempts I finally have one that works great.  The Camera profiles did not exist at that time and the D200 does not have Picture Control Profiles, I believe that was first available with the D300.  Adobe did generate Picture Control Profiles for the D200 and they are also available in Nikon Capture NX2. 
    I currently have a D700, and have spent a lot of time working on profiles for this camera.  I have used the DNG Profile Editor's Chart Tab to generate profiles for most of the Camera Profiles and Adobe Standard.  I find that Adobe Standard profile is brighter than the Camera profiles by about 0.25 stop.  After working on this for about 2 years I have decided to use the Camera Neutral with a modified tone curve and slight reduction in saturation as my starting point and no changes in hue.  I also generated a modified Picture Control profile for Neutral using the Nikon Picture Control software that has the same characteristics and loaded it into the camera.  I get good agreement between jpg's from the camera and the nef file that opens in ACR without adjustments.   The tone curve I used only has three points - the In/out values are 27/22, 127/127, 228/233 and saturation was set to -5. 
    I don't understand what Adobe changed when they genrated the Adobe Standard Profile instead of the ACR4.x versions, but I like the ACR4.x version better.  

  • Canon 5D Mark II Standard Profile - way off (reds)

    This could also be in the Lightroom forum, but here is probably the better place.
    I have always noticed that of all the cameras I ran through LR/ACR the Standard profile for the Canon 5D Mark II is way off in terms of reds. This mostly shows in shots that are underexposed and have tungsten light.
    Adobe's Neutral profile is way closer to Canon's Neutral Picture Style. Adobe's Standard profile can yield very unpleasing skin tones with a red-orange cast that's at its worst in the shadow zones.
    Here are some examples. ACR and DPP have Exposure set +1 and White Balance to "as shot".
    ACR is in its default settings (Blacks 5, Brightness +50, Contrast +25, Medium Contrast Tone Curve).
    DPP has the black point set to -4 to give a similar amount of shadow contrast.
    Please note that on a browser without color management this might not look right and you might need to download the images.
    ACR 6.1, Standard profile
    DPP 3.8.2 Standard Picture Style
    ACR Neutral profile
    DPP Neutral Picture Style
    Thomas

    Yes, and I know what WB is also.  And I know that different raw converters interpret the "as shot" wb exif data differently, and therefore there is no reasonable way to compare results without an explicit wb on a neutral object in the image within each raw converter.
    I believe that in order to do valid comparisons among the different raw converters one should prepare a test image including a known reference, preferably the color checker chart.  The raw image can then be run thru each converter with the first step being to wb on the second brightest neutral patch, and then (and IMO only then) one can do reasonable color assessments.
    Richard Southworth
    Added by edit - oops, I see Jeff jumped in, sorry to be redundant.

  • Canon 5D Mark III Standard Profile - why so different?

    Generally the camera specific profiles in Camera Raw and Lightroom do a pretty good job giving the manufacturer's original look. Especially those for Canon DSLRs are very close.
    With one exception: the Standard Profile for the Canon 5D Mark III sticks out. The LR profile is way more reddish that Canon's own Standard Picture Style.
    I wonder ... is there a certain reason for that?

    It could be a variance in your camera.  Go to the calibration section and adjust the colors and then save new camera defaults.

  • LookTable in Adobe Standard profiles - what is it meant to provide ?

    The Adobe Standard profiles always include a so-called LookTable
    (see dcpTool), and my question refers to the rationale behind this LookTable, and what it is meant to do / to provide (?).
    The question goes back to the procedure of creating custom profiles with the Chart Wizard of the DNG Profile Editor,
    where this LookTable gets automatically deleted while the hue/sat.-corrections are written into the HueSatDelta tables.
    What is gained or lost, or what is difference when this LookTable is removed ? What precisely are the ideas behind the color shifts as stored in the LookTable ?
    Appreciate your comments ans insights.
    Best regars, Peter

    Works,
    There should be no need to deactivate, but you may wish to do it the three step way:
    Uninstall, run the Cleaner Tool, and reinstall.
    http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/cscleanertool.html

  • Adobe Standard profile for 5D mark II includes tone curve?

    In ACR, I see a "Point" tone curve with the "Adobe Standard" profile on Canon 5d Mark II files.
    I've never seen a tone curve before on standard profiles for other cameras. I understand that tone curves are included in the camera standard, faithful, portrait and landscape profiles in attempt to match the in-camera jpegs. But I thought the Adobe Standard profiles were supposed to target only color (hue/sat) and leave tone up to the user.
    Can someone verify that your system includes a point tone curve on 5D2 raws. Maybe my config is messed up.

    Dear Eric,
    I have Photoshop/Bridge CS3 and Camera Raw Version 4.5.0.175 on Windows XP (SP2).
    To "see" tone curves I launch Bridge, navigate to a folder, double-click a raw or DNG file and get the ACR window.
    In the ACR window, I click on the "Camera Calibration" tab and navigate through the various Camera Profiles.
    For each profile, I click on the "Tone Curve" tab and view both the "Parametric" and "Point" curves.
    For canon 5D Mark II DNG files there is always a "Medium Contrast" Point Curve, under every camera profile. I do not have a Canon 1Ds Mark III, but I have downloaded a sample raw file and converted it to DNG. For this DNG I also see a Medium Contrast Point Curve under every profile.
    For my Canon 20D and Canon 1Ds raw or DNG files the Point and Parametric curves are flat under every camera profile.
    When I downloaded the latest DNG converter and DNG Profile Editor, I'm reasonably confident I also downloaded and installed the most current camera profiles.
    For Canon 5D2 files I see the following profiles: Adobe Standard, Camera Faithful, Camera Landscape, Camera Neutral, Camera Portrait, and Camera Standard, in that order.
    For the Canon 1DS Mark III image I see all those profiles, plus ACR 4.4 and ACR 4.3
    For Canon 20D files I see all those profiles, plus ACR 4.4 and ACR 2.4
    To make sure I'm not picking up any presets, I have invoked the pop-up menu in ACR and selected "Reset Camera Raw Defaults". Then, for each file viewed in ACR I checked the pop-up menu again to make sure "Camera Raw Defaults" was checked.
    And a reminder, all this was after I had created a number of custom profiles from Macbeth Color Checker images using the DNG Profile Editor. Those custom profiles created a problem with Bridge previews, so I removed all of them before viewing Point Curves as described above. Still hoping to get some feedback on the Bridge preview problem I described in this message:
    http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.3bb6a869.59b790c8

  • Adobe Standard Profile - YMMV

    I've mostly not used Adobe Standard profile due to a significant magenta bias on my D300, but lately I've been using it more and more (and liking it) - the magenta bias is sometimes easily corrected simply by adjusting the tint slider toward green. - still not perfect for all photos, but is just what the doctor ordered for some...

    Ther are following differences:
    - D700 profile has the same forward matrix for both tungsten and daylight. D800 profile has different matrices, which means it is true dual-illuminant
    - D700 profile has different lookup table which does some rendering (so actually this one is more similar to camera profiles), while lookup table in D800 has minimal impact to colors
    - D800 profile has additional HueSatVal lookup tables for both illuminants, helping to calibrate colors more preceisely. That's why the size difference
    However, Adobe didn't aim to get Nikon colors, they are calibrating their profiles to give similar output for various cameras.

  • Adobe Standard Profile for D800 vs D700

    Adobe Standard profile for the D800 appears to be a better color match to the Camera profiles for the D800 than Adobe Standard for the D700 color match to it's Camera profiles.  I notice that the D800 Adobe Standard Profile is a larger files (118KB) than the D700 Adobe Standard Profile (55KB), so it apparently uses an updated profile.  I have not used the  Adobe Standard profile for the D700 because it's colors appear to be wrong, but the D800 Adobe Standard profile does not appear to have this issue.
    Any comments?

    Ther are following differences:
    - D700 profile has the same forward matrix for both tungsten and daylight. D800 profile has different matrices, which means it is true dual-illuminant
    - D700 profile has different lookup table which does some rendering (so actually this one is more similar to camera profiles), while lookup table in D800 has minimal impact to colors
    - D800 profile has additional HueSatVal lookup tables for both illuminants, helping to calibrate colors more preceisely. That's why the size difference
    However, Adobe didn't aim to get Nikon colors, they are calibrating their profiles to give similar output for various cameras.

  • No Adobe Standard Profiles Found

    Discovered this on a file passed from Lightroom 4.3 to Photoshop CS6 (Up to Date)
    The file from Lightroom looks great and is using the Adobe Standard Profile. When passed to Photoshop, using the Edit in functionality, it is acquiring a yellow tint. Upon examination of the file by opening with ACR, it is having a custom 7D profile (created through the Profile Creator) applied on import instead of the Adobe Standard.
    When I attempt to open the file directly to PS CS6 and use ACR to apply the correct Camera Profile, only the 7D custom profile is available. Adobe Standard and all the Canon Shooting mode profiles are missing.
    Lightroom has all the profiles available-ACR does not.
    Macbook Retina (3 weeks old)  Mountain Lion 10.8.2 (Admin Account), LR 4.3, CS6, 13.1.2, ACR 7.3.0.1 (All products Creative Cloud)
    I (and Lightroom) can see the profiles in the Library>Application Support folder but ACR cannot.
    Anyone else see this-solution?
    Rikk

    Rikk Flohr wrote:
    Ultimately, as I understand ACR, everything was moved to the User-level last major version upgrade.
    I'm running ACR 7.3 on Mac 10.6.8 and in my Root level/Library/Application Support/Adobe there is a subfolder that is named CameraRaw and in that folder are two additional subfolders; CameraProfiles and LensProfiles. As far as I know, nothing about the location of Adobe supplied color and lens profiles has changed for many versions. The User level folder is designed to hold only user made color and lens profiles.
    I don't know why your profiles were relocated but it does seem that something is wrong, somewhere...the only differences between our system is the 10.6.8 vs 10.8.2. I checked on my laptop running 10.8.2 and the correct folders are correctly installed in the root level. The use level Library is actually hidden by default (which is really stupid of Apple) but I ran a Terminal command to make it visible. The only profiles in my user level Library are my custom profiles for color and lenses I've made.

  • Is it possible to copy the standard profile

    Hi,
    Its possible to copy the sap standard profile SAP_ALL, SAP_NEW and the need to edit that copied profile,
    Is its possible means kindly provide me the steps.
    [email protected]
    Thanks and regards,
    Kishoore

    Yes. There are several 3rd party applications available both free and paid. I personally use Senuti-has worked excellent.

  • Standard profile - working with 2 cameras

    A beginner question.
    I use the new, very good beta profiles in Camera raw 4.5. I have set one profile as standard for my eos 5d (Save New Camera Raw Defaults)
    But what`s now when I`m working with my eos 450d. Will ACR choose the new profiles for the 450d or use the "wrong" standard profile for eos 5D?

    > Will ACR choose the new profiles for the 450d ...
    It will choose the appropriate profile for the 450D. That is, anytime you reset a default, you should see a dialog that it being set for a specific camera, including serial#.

  • Terrible magenta "splotchiness" in Leica M9 files with Adobe Standard profile?

    Anyone seen issues with the Adobe Standard profile and bad magenta casts in shadows with the M9?  Here's a shot (low light) with the Adobe profile and with the "embedded" profile, you can see on the bridge of the nose and around the side of the nose it's pretty bad.  Is the Adobe Standard profile supposed to be usable in these situations?

    I have just found this post while in search of a solution for a similar problem. I have the M9 also. At the base 160 ISO I have the same effect visible in very specific mid-shadowed skin-toned areas on four frames in a row but cannot detect it at all in surrounding areas nor another 60 or so frames in same location and lighting. Previously I had only noted this rarely in a couple of shadowed areas and it appears to be limited to very specific planes in one area of the shots. I have eliminated the possibilities of evironmental reflection or actual discoluration of the subject (fingers). WB has been set from a Colorchecker and Whibal card in a frame at same time and location.
    May I please send an original DNG to you for comment?

  • Fs7 standard profile vs slog

    Hello all. I currently own an FS700. I'm upgrading to the FS7. I have looked into color grading with S-Log, etc and realized that I would be more comfortable with just using the standard setting on the camera.
    I'm curious on what the dynamic range would be and as far as color correcting lightly and not have a color grading if it's still worth doing?
    I would be shooting in UHD or 4K internal when it is released.
    For someone like myself who was never done color grading and is doing a feature-length documentary this summer am I really losing out on any benefits as far as the image? Again I'm talking from the standpoint of me not knowing what I would be doing and having to film starting June. I'm not so sure if using S-Log is viable for a run and gun style doc.
    Any help on this would be appreciated.

    Or maybe it does? Why are you so deadset on getting this camera? There are right and wrong reasons for every camera and application. If you aren't  willing to take the time to learn about a camera, because "you don't have time" How do you even know if this is the right camera for you? Shooting standard profile will give you more of a video look, shooting slog will give you a more film look, to put it very basically. If you think you are going to shoot a documentary and do very little color grading, more power to you, you can use the FS7 and get acceptable shots. But to get a richer looking documentary many people are using the slog. As previously mentioned you could burn the lut in, then do minimal work to it and have a nicer looking doc. There are 3 white balance presets, then you can adjust with minmal tweaking the other white balances. I beleive you can customize those buttons as well. Lots of options and lots of work and research to do. Have fun on the journey, it's part of the experience. I just purchased the camera in December and was able to learn the basics of LUT's with a lot of help from info on the board, lots of very talented people on here willing to share the knowledge.

  • Standard Profiles Infotype 1016

    Hi,
    I tried to assign a profile to a position (Object type S) via t-code PO13. Then i executed PFUD. However, the role was not transferred to the user id assigned to the position.
    but when i assigned the position to the role via PFCG and then executed PFUD, it worked fine. The role was transferred to the user id.
    Can someone tell me why it is not working the other way round. I would like to maintain all role assignments in the Organizational Management module.
    Thanks,
    Zubair Naseer
    SAP HCM Consultant

    Hi,
    B007 in relationships is what i was looking for. Created this relationship between position and role and now PFUD is updating the user's authorization. I guess 1016 which i was using previously is meant for structural authorization only.
    RHPROFL0 is also updating user's authorization based on B007 relationship but i think this is also meant for the structual authorizations so i'll put transaction PFUD on scheduler.
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards,
    Zubair Naseer

  • EDM non-standard Profile Interval requirement

    Dear all,
    We have a requirement wherein Profile values are required to be recorded in the following intervals:
    00:00
    04:00
    08:00
    12:00
    12:30
    16:00
    20:00
    i.e. Profile values to be recorded in 4 hour intervals, with an exception to record reading at 12:30 hours also.
    Is there a way to meet this requirement ?
    With thanks & regards,
    Vinodh

    Have never had this requirement before, but think it should be possible to define this.
    Go to SPRO -> SAP Utilities -> Tools -> System Modifications -> User-Defined Enhancements for Energy Data Management -> Interval Lengths -> Define Interval Lengths
    Define a new interval with the equal flag not on as this is not the case. Then you would have to define your own function modules for selection and updating.
    However in the documentation it says: 'Do not perform this activity without consulting SAP first. New interval length definitions impair system performance.'

Maybe you are looking for

  • Query to find all standard invoices applied against pre-payment invoices

    Dear All, Please help me with the query which would list all the standard invoices applied against pre-payment invoices. Additionally they query show display the pre-payment invoices which are not yet applied. Example : Rec # Pre-payment inv # Inv-am

  • HP Pavilion DV8el Entertainment recovery and partitioning drive C

    Someone must have done this before, but I just cannot find anything... I had to replace drive C for bad sectors, and now the Recovery Disks I had made three years ago crash with blue screen on partitioning the drive. Nothing can be installed via that

  • How to show different recorded audio channels in timeline

    I've recorded an interview with two microphones (one was really bad, so I only want to use the other recorded microphone). I imported the clip from the tape camera into FCP X. Now in FCP X on the timeline I only see one audio track when I seperate it

  • Widget "TimesSquare" (in Webcams category) issue

    That widget has been not working anymore since a couple of month. I've tried to trash the two appledashboard preferences, repaired permissions, but no changes occured. Is this a matter of Leopard Update not compatible with that very widget. I've been

  • Business process for power generation co's

    Hi all, Can any one mail me the busines scenarios that are involved in power generation co's and what r the customizations required for the same, where billing has to be done on the basis of meter reading at customers automatically.