Standard vendor evaluation t.code S_ALR_87012077

Hi,
In our system standard evaluation is all ready configured. When i am running program RFKKGRN it also updateing. But when i capmpared report from program S_ALR_87012078 with report S_ALR_87012077 i found that some vendors are not at all appearing in S_ALR_8012077. Also at gross level there is difference in amount.
What can be done so that those vendors to copied to vendor evaluaton sets?
Thanks

Hi,
in trcode    OBAO we have as Program for data retrieve  following program:
RFKRRSEL   Create Evaluations for Vendor Information System
Program which supplies the data for the evaluation
Program for data retrieval. Data are transferred to all evaluations of this evaluation view which are selected to be recreated in the next generation run.
Procedure
If you define an evaluation view, enter a program for data retrieval.
Dependencies
How much data the program retrieves is determined by the selection variant in the Data retrieval variant field.
check also the details below:
No evaluations exist. See long text.
Message no. FE529
Diagnosis
You want to display evaluations from the accounts payable information system. You can only do this if the evaluations were generated as a background job.
Procedure
To activate the standard configuration (in order to gain an instant overview of the functions available in the accounts receivable information system) you must carry out the following steps:
1. Copy standard settings
This function copies the standard configuration. If the log thus generated tells you that none of the configuration (or only a part of it) was copied, this merely means that this function has already been called up, for example from the Implementation Guide. This has no effect on the following steps.
Proceed
2. Define data volume
In this step you define the volume of data you want to evaluate. You branch to the configuration menu and maintain the report variant that has been defined for the evaluation view you selected.
Proceed
3. Select evaluation
You must now define which of the pre-configured evaluations you want to generate. This function takes you to the configuration menu, where you select the evaluation to be generated. The selection field for this is roughly in the middle of the line.
Proceed
4. Generate evaluation
This function generates a background job. The ABAP program you need to run is defaulted in the job definition screen and cannot be changed. The only entry you need to make is the standard variant 'SAP_VARI' in the 'Variant' field.
After the background job has run, you can display the evaluation.
Proceed
For more information, refer to the Implementation Guide and the online help on the 'Financial Information System'.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

    Dear Team,
    Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
    Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nireesh

    Hi,
    Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
    Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
    Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
    Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
    So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
    Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
    In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

  • Vendor Evaluation QM

    Hi!!
    I woul'd like to use SAP standard Vendor Evaluation, but I'm not understanding how the subcriteria 'GR Inspection', of criterion 'Quality' is evaluated...
    Could you help me about what SAP uses for evalueted this subcriteria?
    Thankyou!
    Regards,

    Hi
    Goods Receipt (GR)
    The goods receipt score is calculated from the quality score (QSc) for the inspection lots, according to the following formula:
    QSc = (S1 + S2) / (n1 + n2)
    S1 = Sum of quality scores for the inspection lots
    n1 = Number of inspection lots
    n2 = Number of deliveries for materials with a quality information record, for which no inspection lots exist.
    S2 = n2 * QScmax
    (Qmax-->mainaned at plnat level in SPRO)
    You can break down the GR score for the vendor according to the material and the inspection type.
    Now if You have given 100 as max 1 as min,then suppose there are 10 lots generated for vendor material combination in that purchase Org, Avg of all UD score will be considered as quality score.
    If UD not taken the it is considered as 100
    Please refer following links
    Quality score:
    Re: Quality Score in Vendor Rating
    Re: REGARDING VENDOR QUALITY RATING
    Quality Score Calculation?
    Regards

  • Standard report for Vendor Evaluation

    Hi everyone,
    Is there any standard reports (ALV) to display Vendor evaluation ranking list except ME65, ME6B, ME6H.
    any other Program names will also do...
    Thanks
    Sukriti...

    hi
    S_ALR_87012990 - Evaluation Comparison
    ME6H - Standard Analysis: Vendor Evaluation
    ME6E - Evaluation Records Without Weighting
    ME6C - Vendors Without Evaluation
    ME6B - Display Vendor Evaluation for Material
    ME65 - Evaluation Lists
    regards
    kunal

  • Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

    Hi Gurus
    I have a requirement wherein I  have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
    1. Productivity  with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
    2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
    3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
    The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and  25 respectively.
    Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
    I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
    An early reply will be very helpful to me.
    thanks and regards
    Ashok Kumar Pitla

    T147   - Control table for vendor evaluation
    T147A - Definition for main criteria
    T147B - Text for main criteria
    T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
    T147D - Text for sub-criteria
    T147E - Definition of weighting keys
    T147F - Description of weighting keys
    T147G - Main criteria
    T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
    T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
    T147J - Weighting keys
    T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
    T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
    T147M - Definition of scope of list
    T147N - Text for scope of list
    T147O - Scope of List
    T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
    T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

  • Vendor Evaluation Standardizing Delivery Date Variance

    Hi,
    We are determining what the settings should be for On-Time Delivery and Quantity Reliability under Vendor Evaluation.  I understand how the formual works when it determines the scores for these.  Can someone tell me from a business process perspective what Standardizing Delivery Date Variance relates to? 
    Ours has been set to 100 which is 100 days with the scores set as:
    Percentage
    Score
    0
    100
    10
    90
    20
    95
    100
    80
    200
    60
    300
    40.......
    When we pick 100 days, is that supposed to be an average of how many days late goods receipts are?  Or is there another way to look at it? 
    Thanks
    Beverly

    Have you really read the documentation and the F1 field help, or any of our blogs, documents and wikis here in SCN?
    The table that you presented above is far a way from reality. a percentage can go from blank  to 99.9  and your from -99.9 to blank
    this is to cover both situations early deliveries and late deliveries
    the Standard Delivery Date Variance means the it is the maximum number of days a vendor can be late or early to the wanted delivery date, if this value is reached, then he just missed the point in the sense of the word. he does not get any single point for his performance.
    You have to ask your business how much days variance they accept before they cancel the order, or at least looking for a new vendor with the next order.
    From our point of view everything beyond a week is not at all acceptable and results in a total miss
    and in this case you do not need many percentages either in a 5 working day week  each day corresponds to 20%

  • Configuration vendor evaluation

    Dear MM consultants
    I am facing problem in configuration of vendor evaluation.
    In Vendor evaluation
    1) define weighing key i.e-1- equal weighting, 2 - unequal weighting
    2)define criteria . here I created 1-price, 2-quality, 3- delivery, 4-service
    In criteria "price" I created subcriteria price level & the subcriteria no 1 & scoring method is 4.In criteria quality I created three subcriteria 1)GR INSPECTION
    2) COMplaint/rejection, 3)audit & the scoring method is 7,8,9. In delivery criteria the subcriteria is 1-on time delivery.& the scoring method is "B".& FOR SERVICE CRITERIA 1) SAFTY & SCORING METHOD i HAVE NOT selected because I have taken "no automatic determination".
    in pur organisation data for vendor evaluation when i click on subcriteria icon I put "1" in weighing field.when I click on weighting I entered weighting key 1& 2 for price, quality, delivery, service.& when i click in point score of automatic criteriaI I copied  from standard system which has been maintained in sap system.AFTER DOING ALL THE THINGS WHEN i USED t-CODE ME61 THE MESSAGE COMESweighting key for purchase organisation does not exist.PLEASE SOLVE MY PROBLEM TODAY EVENING.
    THANKING YOU
    CHITTARANJAN

    goto define pur org data for vendor evaluation and select oyur pur org and hit the weighting button at the left and maintin the weighting key for all your criteria here

  • SRM vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    Has anybody worked with the new SRM Vendor Evaluation - Analytics with Surveys?
    I am trying to use the standard surveys/questionnaires provided in SRM 5.0 - SRM_CONF1E, SRM_VL_E, SRM_INVE.
    Have activated the event: Confirmation with the following settings:
    Transaction type: Confirmation
    Vendor: *
    Purchasing organization: *
    Category ID: 
    Source system: 
    Product ID:  *
    Procedure : Always - When Saving
    Probability: 
    WebSurvey: SRM_CONF
    Questioannaire: SRM_CONF_1
    Now, when I do a confirmation from the Confirm Goods/Services Screen, I am still not getting the questionnaire. Are there any other configurations to be done?
    Any help will be highly appreciated/reward.
    Regards,
    Waheed

    Hi Waheed,
    do you get an error message?
    Depending on error, it could be the unicode setting of your system. The standard questionnaires work fine in NON-Unicode. In Unicode system, sometimes it is necessary to copy the standard questionnaire into an own survey.
    Also the XSLT code might be missing and need to be generated.
    Kind regards,
    Claudia

  • System setting for vendor evaluation incomplete

    HI....
    I want to caryout automatic vendor evaluation when i run t code ME63, its show an error system setting for purchase org incomplete where as i have maintained all the parameters from standarfd 0001, can anyone tell me how to carry out ven evaluation.
    Regards
    SARFRAZ

    Hi,
    Select SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Vendor Evaluation. Select following criteria -
    1) Define Weighing keys - Here define weighing keys in addition to 01- Equal Weighing & 02- Unequal Weighing (if required)
    2) Define Criteria - Here 5 standard criteria are maintained. Maintain additional criteria if required. Also maintain sub-criteria. Each main criteria contains some standard subcriteria. If required you may maintain additional subcriteria upto 20 per main criteria.
    3) Define Scope List - Here you may maintain how the evaluated vendors should be ranked.
    4) Define Purchase Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation - Here you may maintain main criteria & sub-criteria for your purchasing organisation. Also maintain score for equal & unequal weighing. Maintain point score for automatic  criteria for each percentage vainance
    Hope this fulfils your query
    Regards

  • Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

    Hello all,
    Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
    At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
    (ME61/ME62/ME63)
    Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Joy Ghosh

    The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
    But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
    There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
    You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

  • Question about key mapping for bank data in SP3 standard Vendor Repository

    Hello Colleagues:
    The situation is the following:
    1) MDM Standard vendor repository does not use Key Mapping for the qualified table data "Bank Details". This makes sense because normally you would pay a vendor in the same account and bank regardless of the company or R/3 system you are paying him from.
    2) However, here in my project customer don't have the same bank data for all of the 3 R/3 Systems. Furthermore, they would like to pay a vendor in a diferent bank and account number; depending on where the payment is generated (Company or R/3 system).
    Because of this, I though about creating a lookup table for the banks which would use key mapping. I did this and I had no trouble importing bank data in to it.
    Now I have this tables:
    1) Banks: Lookup Flat:
    Country and Bank Key as display fields.
    2) Bank Details: Qualified Flat:
    2.a) Field "Bank" as a non-qualifier display lookup field which points to a record on "Banks" table (Described in number 1).
    2.b) The rest of the fields (Account number, Account holder, Reference, etc.) as qualifier non-display fields.
    This aproach works well in data manager.
    However, when I try to import vendors from R/3, I'm not being able to map the bank details, not even with "compound field" functionality, because I cannot map the display fields in the "Banks" lookup table (Described in number 1); in the "Map Fields/Values" tab in the Destination fields pane, it won't show any fields from this table.
    Also, I'm not very sure if I will be able to syndicate this data back to the R/3 systems correctly, this is; replicate only the banks which exist on each R/3 client system.
    Any ideas on how to solve this problem? Please help.
    Best Regards,
    Jorge.

    ... Where
    did Terminal's default keystrokes (e.g., Esc,[5C for
    ctrl-right-arrow) come from? They just produce
    annoying beeps in bash. Are they standard sequences
    for some shell that I don't know about? I
    Somewhere deep in the bowels of computer history....for example
    http://vt100.net/docs/vt100-ug/table3-6.html
    http://www.termsys.demon.co.uk/vtansi.htm#cursor
    that is to say, these codes date back to early hardware terminals such as the VT100. I believe. And that is why Terminal is a member of a class of software called "terminal emulators".

  • Vendor evaluation report for a definite time period

    Hi Experts,
    Vendor Evaluation Summary Report required for the vendors for a definite time period. Output of the report should show the scores of vendors for criteria like Price, Delivery, Quality, Service and summation of all these scores.
    Please let me know if any standard report is available which can fulfill my requirement.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kishore.

    Hi,
    ME6H report is not fulfilling my requirement since i require the output format in the form like vendor, vendor name, plant, price, delivery, service, quality and the summation of scores given to these criterias.
    Thanks
    Kishore.

  • Vendor Evaluation in SAP

    Hi SAP Experts,
    We want to implement the vendor evaluation system for all material and service vendors in SAP. We have evaluated the standard functionality in SAP and most of the requirements are met if we use the standard system. But we are facing few major problems.
    Firstly it is regarding the evaluation level. The purchasing team wants to do the evaluation for each purchase order raised for the vendor. As per my understanding, we can do the vendor evaluation at the most at the purchasing info record level. This might not be sufficient for us.
    Secondly, we have a lot of cases of Service POs where we dont have info records since materials are not involved. I am not sure if the standard system would work in evaluating such cases at each PO level.
    Appreciate your comments and suggestions.
    Thanx & Regards,
    Sateesh

    Hi,
    Evaluating the vendor at PO level meaning we want to evaluate the performance of the vendor for each PO / Service PO. We want a provision to enter the ratings for each criterion for each PO. e.g. Quality of material for PO 45_01 and PO 45_02 would be evaluated seperately. Then we would like to consolidate the data at the vendor level.
    Hope this clarifies the doubt.
    Regards,
    Sateesh

  • Vendor evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE

    We require Vendor Evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE which has information about receipt(GRPO) perfomance against purchase order issued.  We require item code, item description, p.o.no., p.o.qty, delivery date, GRPO NO., GRPO Date, GRPO QTY, Delay no. of days. If there is any report in SAP please inform us. Otherwise any query we can make please inform us how to make query in SAP business one.

    Hi,
    The query from the thread is modified as below to include the customer/vendor name :
    SELECT T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode, SUM(T0.Quantity) 'PO Qty',SUM(T1.Quantity) 'GRPO Qty', SUM(T2.Quantity) 'Return Qty'
    FROM dbo.POR1 T0
    LEFT JOIN dbo.PDN1 T1
    ON T0.DocEntry = T1.BaseEntry AND T0.LineNum = T1.BaseLine
    LEFT JOIN dbo.RPD1 T2
    ON T1.DocEntry = T2.BaseEntry AND T1.LineNum = T2.BaseLine
    INNER JOIN dbo.OPDN T3
    ON T1.DocEntry = T3.docentry
    WHERE T0.ItemCode is not NULL AND T0.DocDate >= [%0] AND T0.DocDate <= [%1]
    GROUP BY T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode
    Check if this helps.
    Please make sure you have a look on the Query Generator and the related books on the SQL query writing before you start creating your own.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Vendor evaluation  URGENT

    While using the t- code ME61 for Vendor Evaluation I am getting an error that Purchasing organization data is incomplete Pls. Help me
    regards

    Hi
    Vendor evaluations done at Purchase organization level.You have to define the control parameters at Purchase organization level.
    Path for configuring the Vendor eveluation:
    <b>SPRO> MM> Purchasing --> Vendor eveluation --> Define Purchase organization data for Vendor eveluation.</b>
    Here you have to enter your purcvhase organization and define the control parameters like  Best score,Applicability period etc.
    If you want std configuration, please copy std Purchase org (1000) settings to your purchase organization by selecting copy as.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

Maybe you are looking for