Standard Workflow for Logistics invoice blocked for Quality

Hi friends
Edd here
I am wondering if there is a standard workflow for invoice verification if the invoice is blocked for QUALITY (not quantity)
i.e. if the Goods have been receipted Movement Type 103, to blocked stock, this should block the invoice.
Is there a standard workflow to pick up this event (RSEG-SPGRC ('Blocking Reason: Quality' = X)
Thanks and regards
Edd

There is no standard workflow for Quality, but you can create your custom wrokflow using similar logic what has been used for the Qty workflow.

Similar Messages

  • Invoice block for lower invoices prices

    In MIRO SAP blocks invoices for higher prices.
    As SAP standard Invoices are not automatically blocked for price and quantiy differences exceeding lower tolerence.
    Is it possible to do it for lower invoice prices.For lower price I want to make ZLSPR =R(Invoice Verification)

    Hi,
    I am not sure but I remember seeing the setting for lower limits on the same place where you set the higher limits.
    Please have a look into the t.code: OMR6, if you haven't. Here, maybe, you need to check the type of the tolerance key used for your requirment.
    Hope this helps,
    Sumant.

  • Regarding Tolerance Keys for Invoice Block For Payment in MIRO

    Hi all,
    In customizing, I have defined Tolerance Keys for Invoice Block for Payment. I have defined all tolerance keys for my company code ...... with Absolute as well as Percentage Limits. But whenever I am doing MIRO & testing for my Block Codes effectiveness, i am finding that everytime my Invoice gets Blocked by Tolerance Key PP(Price Variance) or by date......but not by any other like BD, BW, KW etc. Can anyone help me as how I should check for this. I even tried to study the documentation part available in customizing, but was unable to understand the term like Order Price Quantity units.......Can anyone help me in understanding this thing ........
    Regards.....

    Hi Ganesh,
    below is the user exit where you can check the tolarance and put the Block according to the your requirment.
    User Exit name - MM08R002 -User exit for tolerance checks
    in the above user exit you have to use  the below Function exit.
    1) EXIT_SAPLMRMC_001
    2) EXIT_SAPLMRMP_001
    we implemented the above user exit to put the payment block based on the checks.
    You can find the documentation of the above exit in the system.
    Thanks
    Naresh

  • Invoice blocked for payment without GRN(MRBR)

    Hi all,
    I need to have a report which should show the details of  invoices blocked for payment and which dont have any GRN means Invoice is generated without GRN and hasbeen blocked because of either of quantity or price difference.
    For the same I tried to use MRBR report but it is showing all the invoices blocked but what I need is invoice generated and blocked for payment without having a GRN as base document.

    Hi,
    You can use ME2L but in MRBR report better use filter and sort documents by blocking reason R1 (Missing GRN), this should solve your purpose.
    Hope this helps you. Any point?
    Regards
    Bharat

  • Invoice block for quality stock

    Hi
    How to block the material for invoice payment i(MIRO) which is laying as the quality stock after did the GR against the purchase order.
    for our case, while check the OQB1- the block not happen for the particular material
    but for other materils it working fine

    Hi
    i checked the condrol key . it have the tick mark in blocked invoice and released required.
    and more same thing is maintained in another material which is got the invoice block while do the miro.
    so it may not be related to material master, q-info record.
    so pls tell me anyother posibility which is particular to material and vendor basics .

  • Invoice block for Usage Decision in QM

    Hi All,
    My requirement is any Standard Configuration is there to block the invoice when the material is Waiting for Usage decision. We have a made a control key with invoice block and assigned in Material Master QM view, but the system is not blocking invoice, even the material is still in Quality inspection without any usage decision.
    regards
    Gibi Philip

    Hi ,
    Have you checked in MIR4/MRBR , Whether you are getting any indicator below the filed Quality.
    Also consider some of the help tips provided by SAP.
    "If you only want to pay invoices, when the quality management process  has accepted goods or waived a goods receipt inspection, you must ensure  that invoices are not entered before goods receipt. You do this by planning GR-based invoice verification for the relevant vendors."
    Regards
    K.M.Arun

  • GRN mismatch and invoice blocked for payment

    Hi Team,
    We have an issue with regards to Invoices not being allocated to the right GRN's.  This causes some invoices to be paid without approval, and other invoices that have been approved to be blocked for payment.
    According to standard SAP requires the total GRN quantity to match the total invoice quantity in order for the Invoices to be released for payment.  Unfortunately many get stuck in a payment cycle and invoices are not released for payment, for example;
    We have an  order of a quantity of 100
    We receive an invoice (qty 10)  this is posted
    We complete the GRN (qty 10)
    This should release for payment but unfortunately just prior to the bacs run and running MRBR to unblock any invoices we post another invoice for a qty of 10. 
    Now the total GRN and Inv values mismatch and no invoices will be paid.....
    The cycle goes on and on and more invoices are blocked for payment, even though some GRN's are completed.
    where the GRN value is lower (75) than what has been invoiced (78).  In order to rectify this I need to go into each individual invoice, check the delivery note number and match it off against the GRN.  When I find an invoice that doesn't match a GRN, in most cases these have taken an incorrect GRN and have been paid.  I have to chase for the GRN to be completed or for the invoice to be removed.  Once the totals match I then have to pray no more invoices are posted until the BACs run has gone!!
    Can we apply a fix to force those invoices that match a GRN be approved for payment even if the total's don't match (so the matches will occur line by line and not from the totals)?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You can acheive this by setting GR based IV indicator in PO. hence system won't allow to do invoice with out GR. system will ask quntity match between GR and IR. Ultimately no mismatches will occur. So do GR first and next IR by setting this indicator in PO.I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you.

  • Issue For Invoice Blocked For Payment

    Dear All,
    We received Stock Using MIGO and stock moves in Quality Check. After Invoice Posted using MIRO Invoice created and displayed messages as blocked for payment. Now While making payment for that particular Invoice, system is allowing me to post payment document for that invoice. Actually It should not be post until and unless I released that invoice from MRBR.
    Please Help me.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mahendra Gupta

    Hi Mahendra Gupta,
    I want to know some information about payment block.
    Where did you put it payment block option eiether creation of PO or vendor master data. Because we choose the payment block option creation of PO.
    Please clarify the above information
    Thanks,
    Best Regards,
    venkat

  • Invoice block for PO with down payment

    Hi All,
    My requirement is to block every invoice created for PO that has down payment.
    Is it can be done by standard SAP ?
    Thanks.

    Hi Srinvas,
    Yes, system will prompt me message. But if the user never clear the down payment with the invoice, when I do payment run, the invoice will be selected for payment again.
    This will cause me double payment. That's why I need the invoice of PO with down payment to be block.
    Is this possible by standard configuration ?

  • Same nr range in Logistics Invoice Verification for the MM and FI document

    I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI.  That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment.  In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned).  For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
    This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
    If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock).  The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs.  I now get the error  message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
    How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
    Regards
    Anna-Marie Robson

    I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI.  That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment.  In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned).  For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
    This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
    If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock).  The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs.  I now get the error  message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
    How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
    Regards
    Anna-Marie Robson

  • Invoice blocked for qty reason, but condition type deleted from the PO

    Hi Gurus,
    I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
    The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
    The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
    1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
    2. Invoice posted against the PO.
    3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
    4. Goods receipt posted
    5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
    Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
    Regards,
    Greg

    Gregory Mathews wrote:
    Hi Gurus,
    >
    > I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
    > The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
    >
    > The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
    >
    > 1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
    > 2. Invoice posted against the PO.
    > 3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
    > 4. Goods receipt posted
    > 5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
    >
    > Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Greg
    Hi Greg,
    Are there any a/c entries showing in GR a/c doc for this cond type? I think it could be a bug when you run the ASN Idoc. Try to un-check Delete indicator for FRB1 which would stop it getting deleted.
    Regards
    Shiva

  • Standard report to view materials blocked for MRP

    Hello,
    Is there a standard report by which it is possible to get a list of materials that are blocked for MRP? I.e. MM02 -> tab: MRP1 -> General Data -> Field: Plant-sp.matl status, Value: '03' - 'Blocked for MRP'? Help is appreciated.
    Regards,

    I think there is no report. Best way is to use table MARC. from SE16 or via a query.

  • Vendor Invoice Blocking for non payment

    Sir,
    Any body can help that how to Block the Invoices for ne particular Vendor so that the payment cannot made for that particular blocked invoices but we can make payment for the rest invoices.
    Please help me out in this regard its very urgent and is there ne report from which we can go through the blocked invoices list
    regards
    D. Barua
    FiCoreuser / Accounts Officer
    JMT Auto Ltd.

    Hi,
    go to FBL5n/FBL1n  enter the vendor no and execute,  then select that patcular invoice no. when ur making payment through APP it will not clear that paticular invoice.
    please assign points if its useful.
    regards,
    Gopi.

  • Downpayment - invoice blocked for FI

    Hello SD experts,
    I have a problem in downpayment process when the amount of customer's advance payment is bigger than amount on final invoice. For example: customer paid 25.000 in advance, I posted downpayment and then final invoice is issued only for 23.000. So, we can say we should return to customer 2.000.
    Here is how we enter documents in SAP:
    1. Sales order for downpayment request is created (with billing plan). We put one item (for example service) with price 25.000.
    2. Downpayment request (invoice) is created.
    3. We post downpayment to FI (25.000).
    4. We create final invoice
    On final invoice additional item is automatically added by SAP. Additional item is downpayment settlement. By default both items get same price (value), that is 25.000.
    As I said, I want to charge customer only 23.000. So, I change the amount for first item from 25.000 to 23.000. As soon as I do this and save the document, it becomes blocked and accounting document is not created.
    It can't be released to FI because I get notice about difference between values of two items on invoice.
    My question is: Do we have the process correctly set up ? Are we entering documents in the right way ?
    Another thing – if I look at the printout, I think is ok. I have a line that says that amount to be paid is -2.000 (cusotmer paid more).
    In other cases, if received advance is same or smaller then the final amount, there aren't any problems with blocked invoices.
    Thank you for help,
    RJ

    HI CB,
    While posting a invoice by MIRO, if you come across the following message as block for payment than it is because of Three way matching. You can see three way matching status in purchase order status tab in transaction code ME23N and in purchase order history in item detail.
    Generally invoice is blocked for payment because of two issues:-
    u2022 Price difference: - Price in invoice is higher than purchase order (above tolerance limit).
    u2022 Quantity difference: - Quantity in MIRO is higher than MIGO (or good receipt).
    Once invoice is blocked for payment you need to release it for payment via transaction code MRBR. For next time while posting an invoice through MIRO you should post invoice within tolerance limit.
    You can display and change tolerance limit for invoice verification in customizing with help of transaction code OMR6.
    Regards,
    Anand

  • 2LIS_06_INV Delta Procssing with invoices blocked for payment

    Hi all-
    I am using the 2LIS_06_INV data source to determine invoices that are blocked for payment.  The required fields I am reporting include SPGRM and SPGRP.
    2LIS_06_INV picks up these fields when first blocked with transaction MIRO (setting a qty or price block during posting).  However, updates to these fields using MRBR (releasing the qty or price block) are not captured in delta processing (as stated in OSS note 1494379).  If the 2LIS_06_INV data source specifically does not handle delta processing of MRBR updates, how does SAP handle the reporting of blocked invoices using this data source?
    Thanks!

    Perhaps a bit late, but interesting for future reference.  I had the same issue and logged this with OSS.  The response was that it was a design decision not to include MRBR, MRKO, MR11 and MR11_SHOW in the delta process for 2LIS_06_INV. 
    This means that you have 2 options :
    - Ask SAP to create this new functionality (check note 11)
    - Create a new datasource (based on the change management CDHDR and CDPOS table, I would suggest) to ensure the correct status is sent to BW (that is what we are planning to do).  This can then be extracted after the 2LIS_06_INV datasource.
    Regards,
    Freek

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to transfer data from one MBP to another on the same wireless network?

    Hello All, My wife & I both have MBP's & are connect to the internet wirelessly via a Comcast-supplied Arris modem & a Belken router I purchased. Please don't laugh too hard but when I share data with my wife I, first, transfer it onto a flash drvie,

  • Module to replace binay 0 (00 in hex) with space ?

    Hello everybody, I have a scenario JMS-MQS -> XI -> RFC In the sender, the message coming from MQS (plaintext) is transfrom to an XML message by the module     localejbs/AF_Modules/MessageTransformBean . There is no problem at this level but the foll

  • Printing A4 pge mac 10.6.2

    Since installing snow leopard on imac cannot print A4 page size properly. Everything is reduced to a small box in the centre. This applies to new documents and older ones that previously printed correctly. Have tried different set ups.

  • Why does this work?

    I've been practicing some IPSec VPN scenarios, starting with the typical site-to-site VPN: Router A crypto map mymap 10 ipsec-isakmp set peer 1.1.1.2 set transform-set myset match address 101 access-list 101 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.2.0 0.0.

  • To_date function usage in Oracle 11i

    Expecting the below output using the query: select sysdate, 'to_date('||''''|| sysdate ||''',''DD-MON-YYYY''),'   from dual;           08-OCT-2013     to_date('08-OCT-2013','DD-MON-YYYY'), But, getting the below output, please provide your inputs.