StarOffice 8 U6 (Solaris 10 x86) problem upgrading to U7

hello all,
i have problem installing the new StarOffice 8 U7 patch (120186-11) on Solaris 10 x86 3/05. my current installation of StarOffice 8 is patched up to U6 (120186-10) and has the "ARCH patch to enable install of >= Update 6" patch 126411-01 installed.
the errors that i get from patchadd are:
Architecture for package SUNWstaroffice-core01 from directory SUNWstaroffice-core01.i in patch 120186-11 differs from the package installed on the system.
<snipped other output>
0 Patch 120186-11 is declared as incompatible by 122365-01, which has already been installed on the system.
any help will be appreciated.
greetings,
Stoyan

hello all,
finally found the solution for this problem. thanks to Willi Burmeister who posted a simiral question and a summary to the sunmanagers mailing list:
this was triggered by bug 6404527. It's a missing blank in the pkginfo file of nearly all
staroffice packages.
here is a quick workaround:
# cd /var/sadm/pkg
# grep -l ": R" */pkginfo | xargs perl -pi'.bak' -e 's/: R/: R/'i am happily running U9 now :P
cheers,
Stoyan

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 8 x86: Problems with VNC

    I have installed Solaris 8 x86 on my "slave PC" and now I want to access it remotely from my "master PC". The networking runs well so far. Ping, telnet, and internet access are all possible.
    Now I have installed the tightVNC 1.2.9 package on the Solaris 8 system. When I start the vncserver, the following error message appears:
    "Couldn't start Xvnc; trying default font path.
    Please set correct fontPath in the vncserver script."
    When I try to connect with the vncviewer from my master PC, the screen is started but remains all grey.
    In the vncserver script, the originally set fontPath did not work. I replaced it by some paths which are obviously recognized but with the same result.
    Any help is appreciated very much.
    Thank you in advance!
    Thomas

    I commented all the set fontPath commands in the vncserver script, and now it works properly as desired. Indeed, it seems like no adjustments for font paths are needed.
    The blocking point was, that in the script ~/.vnc/xstartup, the command line "startkde" has to be inserted instead of "kde" which is used in Linux systems for that case.
    Thank you!
    Thomas

  • Solaris 10(x86) u4 8/07 Upgrade Install trashes disk label

    In 4 attempts now to upgrade a working Solaris 10(x86) u2 6//06 system to Solaris 10 8/07 the upgrade fails. If the system reboots at the end of the upgrade, the system is stuck at the grub prompt. When options are set to NOT reboot at the end of the install, inspection of the system produces:
    - I/O errors with df command for /a and /a/var (see next point for why)
    - using format command to inspect partition table reveals that an "effectively empty" label with zero length slices for s0,s1,s3-s7 has been written to the disk effectively trashing the installation and the previously defined partition layout.
    This upgrade failure occurs if using a non-upgraded 6/06 install or a fully updated install. The 6/06 install is partitioned with partitions for /, swap, /var, and /export/home. The system I am trying to upgrade is a test system (laptop with 768MB) and is basically a fresh install of 6/06. I am trying to define and validate the procedure to upgrade a 6/06 system to 8/07.
    I have not explored using Live Upgrade yet as I suspect the same problem will occur to the target if the fault lies in the installer on the DVD.
    Has anyone experienced this issue and can anyone point me in the right direction to remedy this failure?

    In 4 attempts now to upgrade a working Solaris 10(x86) u2 6//06 system to Solaris 10 8/07 the upgrade fails. If the system reboots at the end of the upgrade, the system is stuck at the grub prompt. When options are set to NOT reboot at the end of the install, inspection of the system produces:
    - I/O errors with df command for /a and /a/var (see next point for why)
    - using format command to inspect partition table reveals that an "effectively empty" label with zero length slices for s0,s1,s3-s7 has been written to the disk effectively trashing the installation and the previously defined partition layout.
    This upgrade failure occurs if using a non-upgraded 6/06 install or a fully updated install. The 6/06 install is partitioned with partitions for /, swap, /var, and /export/home. The system I am trying to upgrade is a test system (laptop with 768MB) and is basically a fresh install of 6/06. I am trying to define and validate the procedure to upgrade a 6/06 system to 8/07.
    I have not explored using Live Upgrade yet as I suspect the same problem will occur to the target if the fault lies in the installer on the DVD.
    Has anyone experienced this issue and can anyone point me in the right direction to remedy this failure?

  • Fresh solaris 10 x86 install patch update problems 119060-17 ...

    Just yesterday, i installed a fresh Solaris 10 x86 onto some pc hardware. After getting solaris installed and issues with my network card, i downloaded and installed the free version of the update manager 1.0.x. Next, i proceeded to update all the general patches for the solaris 10 system. I started with the command 'pprosvc -i' from a terminal. It then proceeded to download and validate a bunch of patches successfully until it hit the following 3 patches:
    119060-17 ---- X11 6.6.2_x86: Xsun patch
    122213-10 ---- GNOME 2.6.0_x86: GNOME Desktop Patch
    122912-02 ---- SunOS 5.10_x86: Apache 1.3 Patch
    All 3 failed some kind of validation and then crashed the pprosvc program, at which point it exited with the following error:
    122912-02 cannot be validated
    119060-17 cannot be validated
    122912-02 cannot be validated
    Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digital signature(s).
    I also tried to use the GUI Update Manager to update, hoping the problem was isolated to pprosvc, but that problem was also in the GUI with a similar error message:
    Error occurred...The detailed error message is: Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digitial signature(s)
    Anyone know why Sun's update patch process is so troublesome?
    Getting Tired of Solaris Updates...
    I should mention that this is the free solaris 10 x86 install and i don't have a service contract with Sun. If this problem persists, i don't think i'll get one, as i see only further problems after buying one.
    tired and confused

    Hi,
    There is an issue with this that is currently being investigated. There is another thread that may shed some light on what is happening here;
    http://forum.sun.com/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=316
    Thread title is : Sun UC, Digitally Signed Patches Using New Verisign Certificates
    In the short-term please ensure that the patch mentioned in it is installed.
    To quote part of mentioned thread above:
    "Once the Sun Update Connection client software is upgraded with patch 121118-06 (SPARC) or 121119-06 (x86/x64) or later revisions normal behavior will resume. "
    If this fails to resolve your problem, would you be kind enough to post the output of the following command for analysis please;
    # showrev -p | egrep -e '121454|121119|120336|121082|121564|122232|119789'
    Sincerely,
    Moderator.
    Message was edited by:
    ForumModerator

  • Installation problem sun solaris 9 x86 on intel

    I am trying to install sun solaris 9 x86 intel platform edition on my home pc hp e-vectra, configuration is PIII 800 Mhz, 10 GB HDD, 128 MB Ram, 17" color monitor, but it giving me following error :-
    BooT Panic: trap type e, error 0 at 117499
    Cr0: 800000011, cr1: 4, cr3: 17e000
    Eax: 0, ebx: 7e2c, ecx: 0 edx: 16e350
    Es: fffffffe, edi: 17dfe0, ebp: 7e40, esp: 7e20
    Entering boot debugger:
    Please help me, how can I install sun solaris 9 x86 on my HP E-Vectra PC.
    Kalpesh Mehta

    I had similar problems several months ago. I suspect this happens when host pc does not have floppy drive(or bios somehow misreports it) as it was in my case. Solaris 8 seems to work fine in the same environment, so I keep using it for now. Possible workaround might be to use DCA from Solaris 8: Installation of Sol9 started just fine after I entered Sol8 DCA and asked it to boot from Sol9 CD.
    Hope this problem will be fixed in subsequent Sol9 releases.
    Victor

  • Several mysterious problems with Solaris 11 x86 install

    Hi folks,
    I've recently installed Solaris 11 x86 as a replacement for Solaris 9 SPARC on an Ultra 2 machine. I like the operating system, but I've promptly acquired some mysterious problems. The computer is a Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo E2500 with a Pentium 4 HT 3.06 GHz processor, 2 GB RAM, an 80 GB SATA disk and a 147 GB SCSI disk.
    I have had a few occasions on which the screen goes totally blank, the monitor claims that there is no signal, and I have to restart the machine. However, with the blank screen, the hard drive activity light is sometimes still flashing. This happens predictably when I try to log off (as opposed to shutting down) and when I use Totem media player and click on anything inside the Totem window. The motherboard has built-in graphics and brief specifications can be found here:
    http://uk.ts.fujitsu.com/rl/servicesupport/techsupport/professionalpc/ESPRIMO/Datasheets/ds_esprimo_edition_e2500.pdf
    Yesterday my PS/2 keyboard started causing the motherboard to beep crazily when I use it. It beeps rapidly 4 times, then prints the expected character. However, the problem doesn't occur at the initial log in screen. The mouse cursor has also gone beserk on one occasion, flying all over the screen (I had this problem with a previous PC, but a different OS, and thought it was a hardware fault, which I why I got this new computer). With the keyboard problem, the machine is basically unusable. However, it is configured as a dual boot machine, and the keyboard problem isn't present with Windows XP.
    There are also a few smaller, odd problems. Occasionally all the icons vanish from my Gnome desktop. The command prompt also mysteriously changed from $chris@pluto to $bash-4.1 just before the keyboard problem appeared, although that might have had something to do with me copying my home directory to a different disk and editing the /etc/auto_home file (moving the home directory worked fine). Also, unlike with Solaris 9 SPARC, I find that I have to have external SCSI devices switched on at boot time, should I want to use them later. That's a pain. With Solaris 9, I could run "boot -r" when I first attached the device, then switch on the SCSI devices and mount them whenever I wanted.
    After the useful advice I received here about "more" and "less", I thought I'd post these problems and see if anyone can help. I'd really appreciate some advice. Can anyone identify likely causes for these problems? Which problems can I expect to solve and which do I have to live with?
    Many thanks,
    Chris Tidy
    Edited by: Chris Tidy on 23-Mar-2012 03:36

    Hi folks,
    I've recently installed Solaris 11 x86 as a replacement for Solaris 9 SPARC on an Ultra 2 machine. I like the operating system, but I've promptly acquired some mysterious problems. The computer is a Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo E2500 with a Pentium 4 HT 3.06 GHz processor, 2 GB RAM, an 80 GB SATA disk and a 147 GB SCSI disk.
    I have had a few occasions on which the screen goes totally blank, the monitor claims that there is no signal, and I have to restart the machine. However, with the blank screen, the hard drive activity light is sometimes still flashing. This happens predictably when I try to log off (as opposed to shutting down) and when I use Totem media player and click on anything inside the Totem window. The motherboard has built-in graphics and brief specifications can be found here:
    http://uk.ts.fujitsu.com/rl/servicesupport/techsupport/professionalpc/ESPRIMO/Datasheets/ds_esprimo_edition_e2500.pdf
    Yesterday my PS/2 keyboard started causing the motherboard to beep crazily when I use it. It beeps rapidly 4 times, then prints the expected character. However, the problem doesn't occur at the initial log in screen. The mouse cursor has also gone beserk on one occasion, flying all over the screen (I had this problem with a previous PC, but a different OS, and thought it was a hardware fault, which I why I got this new computer). With the keyboard problem, the machine is basically unusable. However, it is configured as a dual boot machine, and the keyboard problem isn't present with Windows XP.
    There are also a few smaller, odd problems. Occasionally all the icons vanish from my Gnome desktop. The command prompt also mysteriously changed from $chris@pluto to $bash-4.1 just before the keyboard problem appeared, although that might have had something to do with me copying my home directory to a different disk and editing the /etc/auto_home file (moving the home directory worked fine). Also, unlike with Solaris 9 SPARC, I find that I have to have external SCSI devices switched on at boot time, should I want to use them later. That's a pain. With Solaris 9, I could run "boot -r" when I first attached the device, then switch on the SCSI devices and mount them whenever I wanted.
    After the useful advice I received here about "more" and "less", I thought I'd post these problems and see if anyone can help. I'd really appreciate some advice. Can anyone identify likely causes for these problems? Which problems can I expect to solve and which do I have to live with?
    Many thanks,
    Chris Tidy
    Edited by: Chris Tidy on 23-Mar-2012 03:36

  • "/network/physical:default" problem in Solaris 10 x86

    I have a problem with network interface on Solaris 10 x86 on HP Proliant ML 370 G4 server.
    The problem is that at the boot time it report some problem with network interface and writes "see svcs -x"
    # svcs -x
    svc:/network/physical:default (physical network interfaces)
    State: maintenance since Mon 21 Mar 2005 09:55:39
    Reason: Start method exited with $SMF_EXIT_ERR_CONFIG.
    See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-KS
    See: ifconfig(1M)
    See: /etc/svc/volatile/network-physical:default.log
    Impact: 5 dependent services are not running. (Use -v for list.)
    svc:/application/print/server:default (LP print server)
    State: disabled since Mon 21 Mar 2005 09:55:38
    Reason: Disabled by an administrator.
    See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-05
    See: lpsched(1M)
    Impact: 2 dependent services are not running. (Use -v for list.)
    svcs -v shows that /network/physical:default need maintance
    # ifconfig -a
    lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
         inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
    # svcs -xv /network/physical:default
    svc:/network/physical:default (physical network interfaces)
    State: maintenance since Mon 21 Mar 2005 09:55:39
    Reason: Start method exited with $SMF_EXIT_ERR_CONFIG.
    See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-KS
    See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 1M ifconfig
    See: /etc/svc/volatile/network-physical:default.log
    Impact: 5 dependent services are not running:
    svc:/milestone/network:default
    svc:/network/nfs/nlockmgr:default
    svc:/network/nfs/client:default
    svc:/network/nfs/status:default
    svc:/network/ssh:default
    # more /etc/svc/volatile/network-physical:default.log
    [ Mar 21 09:55:37 Enabled. ]
    [ Mar 21 09:55:38 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/net-physical") ]
    [ Mar 21 09:55:38 Timeout override by svc.startd.  Using infinite timeout ]
    ifconfig: plumb: eri0: No such file or directory
    moving addresses from failed IPv4 interfaces: eri0 (couldn't move, no alternative interface).
    [ Mar 21 09:55:39 Method "start" exited with status 96 ]
    I have not any eri device in /dev directory
    How can I add a network interface?

    Try elxl0 :-) This is: E L X L - zero :-) instead of: qfe0.
    PS The 0 can increase to 1,2,.. if you have more 3com cards in the system.

  • Solaris 8 x86 w/ Seagate 410800N Drive - Size Detection Problem

    I have a Dual PII-300Mhz computer w/ 786MB memory and a 4.5GB Wide Scsi (Seagate) and an 8.1GB Narrow Scsi (Seagate - 410800N) configuration.
    I have installed Solaris 8 x86 and applied the "recommended patches". The system is working great EXCEPT for when I attempt to format the ST410800N hard drive.
    The # of cylinders is suppose to be 4925, heads 27, sectors per track 133, etc...
    Solaris is detecting only ~467 cylinders and 26 heads. I've tried to change the "TYPE" to one that I created and it seems to work for a few menu selections, but then when I try to partition the drive, it shows only ~467-470 cylinders. It shows 9 slices and only allows me modify up to #7. The SCSI ID for the drive is 4, which I'm not sure if this is something that Solaris is reserving for a Tape drive. I can change it to 1 or 2.
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I am new to using Solaris, but I'm enjoying it alot. I just would like to get this drive partitioned so that I can move "home" and to install Oracle 8.x
    Thanks,
    George

    Thanks for all of the helpful responses. I figured out the problem.

  • Solars 10 x86 1/06 install problem - empty bootloader

    Hi,
    I'm trying to install 1/06 on a noname AMD X2, on a SATA disk. Had the previous version installed without problems, but 1/06 wouldn't show any options in GRUB. After booting from DVD, GRUB shows me the version number, no options to choose from, and the GRUB prompt. Tried on different machines the same on all.
    Any help would really be appreciated.
    cheers
    cray

    Looks like Solaris 10 x86 1/06 GA has got an issue with GRUB. I've downloaded Solaris Express (nv-b27a) CD-isos, now GRUB & the installation are working fine. Just wondering if I was the only one having this issue (as I've tested it on 3 different machines and on VPC it most likely wasn't a HW-issue).
    Cheers
    cray

  • Solaris 10 x86 64-bit wireless connection problem

    I installed Solaris 10 x86 32-bit on my laptop together with Fedora 10 (Linux) and Windows XP.
    When I boot up Fedora 10 and WinXP, these two OS are able to find the wireless driver automatically, but Solaris 10 failed.
    When I do prtconf -pv, I saw my wireless card is listed in the output.
    So I update the /boot/solaris/devicedb/master and /etc/driver_aliases with my wireless card id - pci168c,001a
    Then do sys-unconfig and reboot
    But after reboot, Solaris still only tries to configure the ethernet card (NIC) rather than checking out the wireless connection.
    I think this might be a design flaw for Solaris 10. If it runs on x86, most users would have wireless connection, not just land line connection.
    Does anyone here have a solution for this problem?
    Thanks a lot!

    I assume that when solaris 10 boots up, it only checks the land line NIC card, not the wireless card. If there is no lan connection, then so be it.
    Is that right?No! :-)
    nwam only supports one device but the device is selectable. physical should activate all devices regardless. So if your Wifi isn't working then I would use wificonfig to see what it can see. Check the man page for scan and showstatus options. Then you'll know what it's seeing.
    alan

  • Couldn't upgrade Solaris 10 x86 from Sun Fire x2200 to Dell Precision Wrkst

    Dear Solaris Experts,
    I need to clone a Solaris 10 x86 system using a ufsdump backup from the following source & target servers:
    Sun Fire x2200 M2 with Quad Core Processor
    # /usr/platform/`uname -i`/sbin/prtdiag
    System Configuration: Sun Microsystems Sun Fire X2200 M2 with Quad Core Processr
    BIOS Configuration: Sun Microsystems S39_3D12 10/06/2008
    # uname -a
    SunOS old 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc
    to
    Dell Precision WorkStation 390
    # /usr/platform/`uname -i`/sbin/prtdiag
    System Configuration: Dell Inc. Precision Workstation 390
    BIOS Configuration: Dell Inc. 2.3.0 05/01/2007
    # uname -a
    SunOS 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc
    Unfortunately, Solaris kept rebooting (failed to boot) from the restored primary disk (both / & /export/home) even though Grub menu appeared. As a result, I have embarked on the path of upgrading path using the same Solaris 10 Installation Disk (5/09) DVD but failed due to not able to mount / (c0t0d0s0), swap and /export/home (c0t0d0s7).
    The source Sun Fire x2200 had two mirrored disks but I am restoring the backups to a single harddisk. Any idea on what step has been missed or that it is not possible to go down this path altogether.
    I have tried a number of different reinstallations & restores but have not had much luck still.
    Many thanks,
    Jack

    I should have searched the forums first. This was the solution to my issue....
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10249826

  • Solaris 10 x86 ipfilter aggr problem

    Hi, all.
    I have Solaris 10 x86 machine
    Kernel Patch: 142910-17
    IP patch: 143593-05
    The problem shortly:
    I am using two network LACP interfaces
    aggr125030 contains e1000g1 interface
    aggr150031 contains e1000g2 interface
    Aggregation 31 was created by:
    dladm create-aggr -P L3 -l active -T short -d e1000g2 31
    and works fine.
    If I add policy based routing rule:
    pass out quick on aggr125030 to aggr150031:y.y.y.y proto tcp from x.x.x.x/32 to any port = 25 keep state
    traffic matches the rule (it is observed through ipfstat -inohv command) but the rule doesn't work.
    How did I decide? I have also ipnat rule
    map aggr150031 <skipped>
    so if PBR works, the ipnat rule is working too.
    If I remove the second aggregation interface aggr150031 and pass the physical interface explicitly, the rule works:
    pass out quick on aggr125030 to e1000g2:y.y.y.y proto tcp from x.x.x.x/32 to any port = 25 keep state
    as well as the ipnat's one.
    x.x.x.x is IP address of e1000g2 interface (or aggr150031)
    y.y.y.y is IP address of router for x.x.x.x IP address
    It seems that PBR for Ipfilter doesn't support aggregation interfaces for outbound.
    Also if you combine vlans 125 and 150 withing one LACP (aggr150031 is replaced by aggr150030 and one physical interface is used for both vlans trunking), the PBR rule doesn't work too.
    What shall I do?

    The problem was caused by the ipfilter behavior - ignorance of interface alias. My ipnat rule was:
    map aggr150031:1 ...
    I have changed into:
    map aggr150031 ...
    and the things began to work.
    Sorry for the noise.

  • Solaris 10 x86 intallation problems

    I have an athlon based machine which was happily running XP this morning. I had previously divided the disk to use a Linux distribution on one half and XP on the other. I wanst using the Linux bit much due to graphics driver problems so I decided to replace it with a Solaris 10.
    I duly went through the installation and was told that the solaris boot loader was incomaptible with the Linux one, grub I think, so I overwrote it and proceeded with the install. During the disk layout procedure I asked it to preserve my XP partition and use the rest for solaris. I had to shrink the solaris bit beyond teh full size by 100k or so and eventually it was happy, or so I thought.
    Solaris is now duly installed and runs fine. I just need to sort out a network card driver. However my problem is that the sun boot loader sees the old XP partition as an extended dos partition (partition 3) and wont boot from it....
    WHat have I done wrong?
    Please dont tell me my XP partition is lost! Is there some tool I can use to make it bootable again? I have seen the grub bits on the GNU site. Are these any use?
    All Help gratefully recieved.

    FYI: I tried yet another version of solaris as i found out that theres a bug in the 64-bit kernel on update 4 for alot of new processors. Solaris 10 x86 update 7 did the trick! :). Installed right away on a standard 'Solaris 10 (64 bit)' VM. I still find it strange that the most recent version of solaris 10 fails to even start the installation.

  • Gcc problems on Solaris 10 X86

    I'm using Solaris 10 x86 and gcc from /usr/sfw/bin and have come across a couple of problems:
    which gcc
    /usr/sfw/bin/gcc
    gcc -v
    Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
    Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure prefix=/usr/sfw with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas with-gnu-as with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld without-gnu-ld enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath)
    Problem 1
    cat ll.cc
    #include <signal.h>
    int CS;
    gcc -c ll.cc
    ll.cc:2: error: expected unqualified-id before numeric constant
    ll.cc:2: error: expected `,' or `;' before numeric constant
    CS is defined in the file /usr/include/sys/regset.h as:
    #define CS 15
    I've changed the code to use MYCS instead and this gets around the problem. Does anyone have a more elegant solution to the problem?
    Problem 2
    In a g++ compilation I have a file that includes cpp_type_traits.h.
    The compilation fails with:
    /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/../../../../include/c++/3.4.3/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:69: error: expected unqualified-id before "namespace"
    The relevant line in cpp_type_traits.h is:
    namespace __gnu_internal
    Knowing rather little about g++ I've been Googling for an hour but not found anyone else with the same problem.
    Many Thanks
    Andy

    I'm not fully sure what might cause your problems since I'm not a programmer myself. However, I do wonder if the gcc version located in /opt/sfw/bin may do you some good. When all other options fair I'd recommend getting the Studio 11 package and just use the cc compiler provided by Sun themselves. Its free anyway.

  • Java upgrade over solaris 10 x86 32 bit for weblogic installation

    Hi All I need to install weblogic over solaris 10 x86, for that i need following configuration :-
    JDK Sun Java 2 JDK 6.0 Update 05 with the Java HotSpot™ Client and Server
    VMs (32-bit) and all later service packs of 6.0
    How can i update this java over solris or is it actually required.Can someone please help??
    Sharad

    I have solaris 10 x86 32 bit installed over my system and i have got this weblogic installer :-
    Oracle WebLogic Server 11gR1 (10.3.4) Generic and Coherence V24338-01 1.1G
    Would it be gud. or i would need something else. Actually thing is I am having windows machines over which i have installed solaris 10 x86 running over VM ware, i also upgraded java to 7 update. Now would it go fine with the mentioned file or I am going wrong somewhere,
    Please suggest as i am running out of resources here.
    Thanks in advance.

Maybe you are looking for