Startup command not picking correct pfile

Hi Guys,
I am facing a problem. Whenever I try to start oracle on my Linux machine I get the foillowing error:
ORA-01078: failure in processing system parameters
LRM-00109: could not open parameter file '/home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/dbs/initARIES.ora'
Actually the pfile mentioned is not the correct one. I do not know where it is taking the path from. I had to start using the following command:
startup pfile=/home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/aries/pfile/init.ora.110200612140
Please provide me some way that I need not to mention the full path of pfile everytime.
Thanks

You can also create the initARIES.ora file in the dbs directory (the database is searching there by default) and use the IFILE parameter to point to the file you actually want to use.
It seems the file you currently using is the one created during installation. Doesn't you have an SPFILE??? Using an SPFILE has some advantages (faster startup, change parameter using alter statement). You can create one via create SPFILE xxx from PFILE. If you place it in the dbs directory oracle should find it automatically. Again no need to pfile in the startup command.

Similar Messages

Profit center not picking correctly in PO from sales order

Hi Experts,
Profit center is not picking correctly.. in PO
In material master Profit center is configured as XXXX
We have raised a sales order for the same material with two line items (e.g) 1500 kgs & 1600 kgs and profit center has been changed in the sales order to YYYY
There is one purchase requistion for the same material with two line items
But we have raised two purchase order for each line item in which the same sales order is linked to these two purchase order.
In the first PO , for the first line item in sales order ie., 1500 kgs profit center is picked from the sales order ie, XXXX which is correct but in the second PO, for the second line item in sales order ie., 1600 kgs profit center is picking as YYYY ie which is configured in material master.
What could be reason ? Help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Narayanan

Hi Narayan
Check the Account assignment in the 2nd PO.. Does it have E as Acct Assgn Category?
It should have sales order as the account assignment... If yes, then it must pick up PC from the sales order...
Try to put a deletion flag to this PO and create a new one, if possible... You would come to know if some one has changed the PC
BR,Ajay M

Webi does not pick correct Data

Hi Guys,
I have a webi. The Universe for the Webi is based on Bex Query. I see correct Data in Bex Query but when I create a webi report it does not pick correct data.
I have checked following points already:-
1] No Resstriction at Query Level
2] No restriction at Universe Level
3] No Filters/ Restriction at Webi Level.
Can anyone suggest whats happening?
Regards

Hi Ray,
It happens sometimes that data gets aggregated over all the dimension objects present in the 'Available Objects' section in webi.
Try to pull only the characteristics present in the row section of the bex query say 'X' and measure in the column section of bex query say 'Y' into the results pane in the edit query window in webi.Then run the report and check.
This will give you the idea about aggregation.
Regards
Vineeta

Color picker does not pick correct colors

I have a Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 with pre-installed PS Touch. Has anyone else noticed how the color picker doesn't always pick correct colors? In my case, it picks a slightly darker color than the source color. I wanted to upgrade to version 1.3 to resolve this, but cannot find any upgrade option anywhere. Please help!

This screenshot is of a normal layer at opacity 100%. I first did a uniform color fill, then sampled the color. Every area of color, therefore, ought to be exactly the same, without any slight variation whatsoever.
The two brushstrokes to the left are done with the brush hardness set at 20%, with no pressure related controls, the left-most one set at 20%opacity, and the one to the right of it set to 100% opacity.
The two brushmarks in the middle are done with brush hardness set to 100%, again, no pressure related controls, the leftward one set at 20% opacity, the right at 100 %.
The two to the right are again done with 100% brush hardness, but this time, pressure related opacity control has been enabled. The left is at 20% opacity, the right at 100%.
As you can see, the center of each brushstroke seems to have thecorrect color. So I agree with georg_maximus. It appears that this issue is an opacity related one, rather than a color picker problem.

APP not picking correct numbers

Hi,
I assigned one number range (eg: 100 to 200) for two document types ZP and ZV.
While running the payment program the system is picking the numbers differently.
Eg:
when i run payment run on 01.04.2007 the system is picking number ranges 100,101,102,103,105,106,108 etc.
when i run payment run on 02.04.2007 the system is picking number ranges 104,107etc.
the numbers 104 and 107 is not picking in the first payment run. why it is happenning
this is the issue of client.
REQUIRE URGENT SOLUTION
Rgds
sunfico

Hi,
Have a talk with your basis consultant for buffering number range's. For FI it should be 1!!
Paul

F.05-Curr Translation - System not picking correct accounts from FBKP (KDF)

Hi FI Gurus,
We are having INR as Company Code Currency & USD as Group Currency.
We have given a diff set of accounts in FBKP-KDF for valuation and translation.
When we run F.05 for translation with Currency Type 30, the system is correctly converting all INR line items into USD but while posting the accounting document the valuation accounts are getting picked up instead of translation.
In debug, we found out that the system requires Clearing Document to go for Translation accounts & if it gets the clearing document in line item then it is picking up the correct accounts.
But then how the translation works for P&L accounts or balance accounts?
What is the exact functionality of Translation? How postings can be generated to correct accounts?
Regards
AK

Make the following entries in F.05 and execute.
General Selections:
1. Enter comany code
2.Valuation Key Date
3.Valuation Method
4. Valuation in Curr Type: 30
Under Posting:
1. If you are running it in a test mode, then do not check the boxes Bal. sheet preparation valuation and Create Postings.
2. Enter document date, posting date and period
3. Check the box: Reverse Postings
Under Open Items
1. Check Valuate G/L Account Open Items
2. Specify your G/L Account Numbers
3. Check the radio button: Valuate GR/IR
4. Check the box: Valuate Vendor Open items
5. Check the box: Valuate Customer Open Items
Under G/L Balances
1. Check the box: Valuate G/L Account Balances
2. Specify your G/L Account Numbers
Under Other
In our system, we created a variant and entered it in the blank field next to List Variant.
Under FASB 52
1. Exch. rate type for translation: Enter your exchange rate type here.
2. Check the box: Use for translation
3. Translation of currency type: 10
Execute your report.
Point of Note: None of this would work if you have not configured your foreign currency valuation properly. To get FCV working can be very frustrating and you would need to take your time. We have been working on ours for almost 7months now so patience and more research would help.

CBO not picking correct indexes or doing Full Scans

Database version - 10.2.0.4
OS : Solaris 5.8
Storage: SAN
Application : PeopleSoft Financials
DB size : 450 gb
DB server : 12 CPU ( 900 Mghz each ), 36 GB RAM
ASMM - sga_target_size = 5 gb
Locally managed tablespaces - MANUAL
- db_file_multiblock_read_count - not set explicitly in spfile ( implicitly defaulted to 128 )
- other optimizer related parameters are set to default
- system_statistics - CPUSPEEDNW=456.282722513089, IOSEEKTIM =10, IOTFRSPEED=4096
- dictionary object system stats were last gather in Nov 09
- stats on schema objs are gathered every night using custom script, but I have to say there are some histograms on some tables which were gathered by PS admins
begin
dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats(
ownname=> 'SCHEMANM' ,
cascade=> DBMS_STATS.AUTO_CASCADE,
estimate_percent=> DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE,
degree=> 10,
no_invalidate=> DBMS_STATS.AUTO_INVALIDATE,
granularity=> 'AUTO',
method_opt=> 'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE 1',
options=> 'GATHER STALE');
end;
Details :
We are experiencing erratic database performance. It was upgraded from 9i to 10g along with PS software upgrade. A job that runs on one day in 12 hrs(that is high in itself) would take more than 24 hrs another day.
We have Test and Staging envs on other servers which do not have performance issues of production magnitude. The test, staging dbs are clones of prod, created by ftp'ing files from one location to another, not sure if that makes any difference but just pointing out.
On Prod db some symptoms which baffle me are :
1) sql executing for over 40 minutes, check the plan and it is using an "incorrect" index, idx1. Hint sql with "correct" index, idx2, and it runs in few seconds. result set <400 rows. Cost with hint with idx2 is HIGHER. This scenario is still understandable as CBO is likely to pick a lower cost.
- But why is there so much discrepancy in cost and response time?
- what is influencing the CBO to pick an index which is obviously not the fastest response time?
2) sql plan shows FTS , execution time , runs forever . But a hint with index in this case shows the cost is LOWER and response time is in seconds, so why is CBO not even evaluating this index path? Because as I understand the CBO, it will always pick the lower cost plan.
What is influencing the CBO. Is it system stats? or any other database parameter? or the hardware ? the large SGA?? histogram ?? Stats gathering?? is there is any known issue with DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE and cardinaility?
Where should I put my focus?
What am I looking for ?
I do have Jonathan Lewis's Cost-Based Oracle Fundamentals which I have just started so perhaps I will be enlightened but while I read it, it would be of immense help to get some advice from forum gurus.
At this time I am not posting any exec plan or code, but I can do so if required.
Thanks,
JC

Picking up just a couple of points - the ones about: why can performance change so much from one day to the next, and how can the optimizer miss a plan which (when hinted) shows a lower cost.
NOTE: These are only suggestions that may allow you to look at critical code and recognise the pattern of behaviour
Performance change:
You are using "gather stale" which means tables won't get new statistics is the volume of change since the last collection is "small". But peoplesoft tables can be big, so some tables may need a lot of data to change (which might take several days or weeks) before they get new stats. The 10g optimizer is able to compare the high-values stored with the predicate values supplied in queries, and decide that since the predicate is higher than the known highest value, it should scale down its estimates of data returned. After a few days when the stats haven't changed, the optimizer suddenly gets to the point where the estimated data size is much too small and the plan changes to something that you can see is bad. The typical example here is a date column that increases with time, and a query on "recent data" - the optimizer basically says: "you want 9th Feb - the high value says 28th Jan, there's virtually no data". Keeping date and sequence-based high-values up to date is important. (See dbms_stats.set_column_stats).
Lower cost plans available:
Sometimes this is a bug. Sometimes it's an unlucky side effect. When a query has a large number of tables in a single query block, the optimizer can only examine a limited subset of the possible join orders (for example, a 10-table join has over 3million join orders, and the default limit is 2,000 checked). Because of this limit, Oracle starts working through a few joins orders in a methodical manner, then does a "big jump" to a different set of join orders where it checks a few more join orders, then does another "big jump". It may be that it never gets to your nice plan with the lower cost because it doesn't have time. However, by putting in the hint, you may make some of the orders the optimizer would have examined drop out of the "methodical list" - so it examines a few more in one sequence, or possibly "jumps" to a different sequence that it would not othewise have reached. (I wrote a related blog item some time ago that might make this clearer, even though it's not about exactly the same phenomenon: http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/table-order/ ).
Your recent comment about dynamic sampling is correct, by the way - by default (which for your version is is level 2 as a system parameter) it will only apply for tables which don't have any statistics. It's only for higher levels, or when explicitly hinted for tables, that it can apply to tables with existing statistics.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
"Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
Carl Sagan
To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.

Report not picking correct data

Is it possible for vendor aging report to dispaly for Particular Vendor the
amount ( bsik-dmbtr ) using Purchase organization field.
There are two Purchase Organizations C100 ( for CPU ) and D100 ( for Monitor ) in my case.
data is picked from bsik , lfm1 ,lfa1 tables.
Example : if D100 is for Monitor-screen and has amount 1000.
c100 is for CPU and has amount 2000.
In that case report with Vendor , comp code, Pur. Orga and period should disply
c100 amount 2000.
D100 amount 1000.
my report is showing that vendor is existing for C100 or D100.
but for vendor that exist in both C100 and D100. ( Say vendor number 200 )
the amount is coming for vendor number 200 in c100 and d100 equal to 1000.
but it should come c100 = 2000
and for d100 = 1000.

hi
I am not sure about this point in vendor aging report. i have added a pur Organization field in this report.
I am asking
If vendor no 123 is in D100 and C100 ( D100 and C100 are Pur Organizations )
Initially no transaction is there.
Suppose vendor no 123 created a Puchase Order of 500 /- using D100 Purchase Organization in duration 01.01.2008
to 01.01.2009
But vendor no 123 in Purchase Organization C100 has no transaction.
Then 123 with D100 is sould show 500/-
and 123 with C100 is 0 /-.
output of this report should show above results ?
If output is like this then how to rectify my report ?
Or it shoud show the result like this
Then 123 with D100 is sould show 500/-
and 123 with C100 is 500 /-
My output is showing like above same
Thanks

Delivery Output Not picking correct condiotion

Hi All,
As per my clients requirement I have created a new condition with Shipping Point/Sales Document Type/and Material for Delivery out put,the other two conditions being , Shipping Point/Sales DocumentType & Shipping Point/Delivery Type I placed the new condition in first place in access sequence followed by the remaining two, and created condition records for all the three with different printers for each of them.
Now when am creating delivery always the second condition i.e,Shipping Point/Sales DocumentType is getting picked ahead of the first one, it is happening that if am checking the item data in the delivery then it is automatically changing to the first condition type, please suggest how to make the system to read the first access.
P.S :Tried Requirements & not working
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Sekhar

Hi
I got IT
Regards
Sekhar

FM not picking correct entry

Hi experts,
Can anyone please explain what the below FM performs:
==================================
FUNCTION Z.
""Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(CHRT_ACCTS) TYPE /BI0/OICHRT_ACCTS
*"     REFERENCE(ACCOUNT) TYPE /BI0/OIACCOUNT
*"     REFERENCE(CO_AREA) TYPE /BI0/OICO_AREA
*"     REFERENCE(ZPC) TYPE /BIC/OIZPC
*"     REFERENCE(KEY_MUST_BE_FOUND) TYPE BOOLEAN DEFAULT 'X'
*"     REFERENCE(MSGTY) TYPE SYMSGTY DEFAULT 'I'
*"     REFERENCE(GET_FIRST_ENTRY) TYPE BOOLEAN DEFAULT 'X'
*"     REFERENCE(DATETO) TYPE RSDATETO
*"     REFERENCE(DATEFROM) TYPE RSDATEFROM OPTIONAL
*"     REFERENCE(RECNO) TYPE SYTABIX OPTIONAL
*" TABLES
*"      ZZ STRUCTURE /BIC/AZZ00
*"      MONITOR STRUCTURE RSMONITOR OPTIONAL
*"      MONITOR_RECNO STRUCTURE RSMONITORS OPTIONAL
CLEAR ZZ.
ZZ-chrt_accts   = chrt_accts.
ZZ-account      = account.
ZZ-co_area      = co_area.
ZZ-/bic/zpc = zpc.
ZZ-datefrom     = datefrom.
ZZ-dateto       = dateto.
REFRESH ZZ.
PERFORM z1000_read_ZZ TABLES ZZ
                             USING get_first_entry.
return values found in table or raise exception
IF ZZ[] IS INITIAL
AND key_must_be_found = 'X'.
    PERFORM z1000_set_return_message
                      TABLES monitor
                      USING msgty 'YFI_MIR' '013'
                      'ZZ'    chrt_accts
                        account co_area.
    PERFORM z9999_return_message_recno
                      TABLES monitor_recno
                      USING msgty 'YFI_MIR' '013'
                      'ZZ    chrt_accts
                        account co_area
                        recno.
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.
=========================================
In our case there are 2 records in the table ZZ, of which the FM should pick the latest record but it is picking the old record.
Can anyone please check where the error is and any correction I have to make inorder to rectify the error.
I suppose we need to change in the following line
PERFORM z1000_read_ZZ TABLES ZZ
                             USING get_first_entry.
Regards,
Bhadri M.

You can sort the ZZ table records based on your logic by which you want to have the latest record.

Dummy Profit Center not picking correctly in PO

Dear All,
PO was cretaed withAccount Assignment Y (Y-account assignment for Balance Sheet accounting) and without material.
But in the PO dummy profit center 999 is getting picked up .Ideally profit center RT3 should be picked.This gets updated in EKKN table.
please let me know your thoughts why the Dummy Profit Center is getting Picked up.
Many Thanks
Shyam

Hi,
Check in the Material Master in General Plant data/ stor 2 tab the dummy profit center is assigned or not
Best Regards,
Silky

F.07 does not pick correct customer balance

I have two customer accounts for which upon running the transaction F.07 ,in test mode , it is returning the cumulative balance from last year( the top line in FD10N) . But in our test system , it is giving the correct balance . Test system was refreshed before year-end.
Why is it not returning this year's balance in Production?
Thanks
Edited by: MN on Feb 7, 2010 8:33 PM

Hi,
check for any authorization issues.
Regards

With holding tax base amount not picked correctly.

HI
While calculating WHT we have 2 problems.
1) The wht base amount is updated 4 times in all tax type i.e Basic ,Surcharge, cess and se-cess. (upto Sep 09 postings)
Example My vendor inv for Rs.540279 i have to deduct 2.266% WHT
Display withholding tax information screen is updated with following setup
W/Type W/base     W/tax
1            552806      11056      Basic
2            552806        1106      Sc
3            552806          243      Cs
4            552806          122      SEcs
2) In vendor line item layout we include WHT/base amt- wht tax amt column. Some cases W/base & W/tax it is displayed. But in few cases it is not displayed. How to display this in all cases.
Please guid me how to change this display to show the correct W/base amount. What settings i need to maintain in Img.
With regards
RSS.

Hi...
Please Check the in vendor master records wether you have ticked the Liable check box or not for invoice at the same time you have to uncheck Liable for payment
Defore that you ahve to create
1. Define Min/Max Amounts for Withholding Tax Types for invoice
2. Define Min/Max Amounts for Withholding Tax Codes for invoice
after that you have to enter in the vendor master like
Enter Withholding Tax Types
Enter Withholding Tax code and Select liable for inovice
Enter Type of recipient
I hopw it will helps you
Regards
vamsi

BOM not picking correctly in Sales Order Costing

Hi,
During Sales Order costing of configurable material Say ABC is configurable material(finished material) and it has 4 components. I am using standard sales order costing variant as PPC4. During sales order costing from VA22(quotation) of the material ABC(finished material) system take its first two components during costing. Remaining two components system does not take. It shows correctly BOM usage as 2. But two components are missing during calculation.. What may be reaon or special configuration is required for sales order costing ?
Best Reagrds,
Samrat

Dear,
please check your condition type : Ek02
It is used for statistical posting. If you use this condition type, the result of unit costing is simply a statistical value which you can compare with the price. So, this can be can used instead of VPRS to calculate the profit margin for the assembly item.
Please note the following points:
1) The condition type must have condition category 'Q' (costing).
2) The condition type must agree with the condition type defined for unit costing in the pricing procedure.
So, EK01 & EK02 are the condition type that will display the results of the unit costing for certain type of sales document and can be used in Make To Order scenario.
Sales order cost estimate can be flow to COPA. Where you have to maintain setting in COPA in Define access to Standard cost estimate for costing key select sales order cost estimate.
For transfer SD to COPA you have to use Transaction KE4I here enter SD conditions with COPA Value fields.
So, whether EK01 or EK02, these will determine from Requirement class configuration. Requirement class in turn there is requirement type and requirement type is determined by item category and MRP type when you cost a sales order (valuated/non valuated sales order) at that time when save the cost estimate then the cost value automatically gets populated in your condition tab. Hence, if the item is not relevant to sales order costing then the cost comes from VPRS.
For more details please check below links
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/VPRS%2C+EK01%28ActualCost%29andEK02%28Calculated+Cost%29
Std Cost Calculation in Sales Order - EK02 and by T-Code CK11N
Thanks,
Ram

BO 4.0 CRJob server not picking correct numbr of CPU

Hello All,
I have installed BO 4.0 SP02 patch 11. I have seperated the CR Scheduling service as a seperate job server form AJS.
My CR jobs are running fine however, I have 8 CPU on that machine but in matrics page of Job server, it is showing
only 4 CPU. Why it is not showing all the 8 CPU?
does it mean that its limited to work for 4 CPU only.

Hello,
I have created CR Scheduling service as a seperate job server in BO 4.0 SP02 and the CPU count in metrics shows 8 CPU.
So for sure the number is not limited to 4.
Regards,
Sonia

Startup command not picking correct pfile

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for