Static Conference ID

Is there any way we can setup to assign Static Conference code for Live Meeting 2007 users in LYNC pool?
"AssignedConferenceTypeByDefault" and "EnableAssignedConferenceType" 
settings applied to LYNC clients, but not Live Meeting 2007 clients. Still Live Meeting Clients are getting dynamic conference ID numbers.
Thanks in advance
Tek-Nerd

Hi,
As far as I know, the two policies you said above only apply to Lync Server 2010 and Lync Server 2013. So it may not valid for Live Meeting 2007 client, and I can't find the way to change the habit so far.
As the user is in the Lync pool, if possible, the user can use Lync client instead of Live Meeting 2007 client.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • HI I have an Iphone 3GS and the microphone jack works when I play music but not when making phone calls.   please help as I use it for conference calls

    Hi   I use my phone for conference calls and use the microphone jack to connect to speakers.      It doesnt work when making phone calls but when i play music on the phone the jack works with the external speaker.   

    Happy to have been of help. Hope all goes smoothly.
    BTW, for the sake of others who may help you here, it's usually most polite if you mark the post that answered your question as being the one that "solves" it, not your own post. That's how people get points here, if a questioner marks their post as either "helpful" or "solving". It's not an issue for me, but for those just starting out in the forums it may be important to them. See:
    https://discussions.apple.com/static/apple/tutorial/mark.html
    and
    https://discussions.apple.com/static/apple/tutorial/reputation.html
    Regards.

  • How To Select One Video Feed During A Conference

    I have a need to conference with three people and show them a single video presentation. I only need to hear their audio feeds, I do not need to see their video, and they do not need to see each other.
    I thought it was possible in iChat to select which of the two conference windows would be full screen. But I don't seem to be able to find a way to do this.
    To be clear –
    I have a video which is essentially my video feed.
    I need to have two different people in two different locations see it at the same time
    I need to be able to hear their comments.
    I don not need to see them, and they do not need to see each other.
    When the screen is split into two windows at an angle, the quality of the video I am sending degrades and the the forced presentation perspective makes the picture even harder to see. Also, there is no reason to tie up the bandwidth with video feeds from my collegues. The ONLY need to see the video, not each other. We all only need to hear each other (my audio is run throug a mixer so I can send video audio as well as my voice).
    I thought about trying a video/audio conference, but can't figure out how to invite them to a video chat if they are both audio only. I did mangae to get one of them online as audio only, but it still created the same presentation screen only with a static placeholder where the video would normally be for one of them.
    Is there any way to do what I want, i.e. share a single video source with multiple people in full screen, and enable two way audio with all parties at the same time?

    Hi,
    I thought about trying a video/audio conference, but can't figure out how to invite them to a video chat if they are both audio only. ...
    This can be done if the Buddy goes to the Video menu and Disables the Camera (or Video chat if Lion).
    However you are right in that iChat presumes there will be video and still places the place holder for that "Video"
    I must admit to not having tried this with two Audio Only Buddies whilst sending Video myself.
    Logic says it should be possible.
    iChat does base the video quality on what it can manage.
    This is based on your upload speed and that (download) of the Buddies.
    (one Buddy can slow thing up to an extent that in 3 and 4 way chats the Video will drop off - normally the last person added)
    If you can get One Way Video with two Audio Only Buddies the Bandwidth issue should not raise it's head.
    However things to try:-
    In iChat Menu > Preferences > Video section set the Bandwidth Drop down to 1Mbps  (Also try it at 500kbps)
    The 500kbps is high enough for 3 and 4 way full on Video chats  but you may have issues if the Streamed Video is more detailed than the 640 X 480 pixels for ichat Best rate in iChat 5  (720 X 480 in iChat 6). AT this point you lose out to iChat trying to process the Video.
    Strangely the Yahoo App for Mac does exactly what you want. (At least in one to one chats)
    It deals with Video as a Stream that others can then look at whilst Audio is more like ichat in that it is Buddy to Buddy.
    I don't have enough Buddies in Yahoo (And using the Yahoo App to test this further.
    9:28 PM      Thursday; February 9, 2012
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
      iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Lion 10.7.3)
     G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
     MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
     Mac OS X (10.6.8),
    "Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

  • Bizarre WiFi Connectivity Issue; Self-Assigned IPs, Static IP Doesn't work

    The short and sweet of the problem: Macs/Apple Devices are pulling self-assigned IP addresses when connecting to a Linksys EA6900/AC1900 router.
    Here’s the detail: I am working at an office with 1 Airport Extreme and 1 Linksys EA6900/AC1900, both are configured for Bridge Mode and both use WPA. DHCP is being handled by a Watchguard XTM5 series firewall.
    When Macs (and often iPhones) connect to the Linksys (on 2.4 or 5Ghz) they get a self-assigned IP address. If you enter a manual address you still do not have any connectivity. However, if you connect to the Extreme you will instantly get an IP address, and if you switch to the Linksys your DHCP address will carry over and you will retain connectivity. This problem does not happen to the Windows machines in the office- they all connect to all base stations without any issue. Total users on the network range from 5 to 20 WiFi users at any given time plus and AppleTV (also affected).
    More info: When there are between 5-10 people in the conference room for a morning meeting the Macs will all revert to self-assigned addresses (even if they were working before). The workaround has been to connect to the Extreme, but there are occasions when this occurs that the Extreme will also not seem to pass the DHCP addresses from the firewall; addresses become self-assigned and you lose all internet. To make matters more odd, this behavior seems to really only affect the network during business hours; after hours the Linksys works pretty much normally and any device can connect without issue.
    Things I’ve done: Run Wireshark and located a number of rogue devices that were handing out overlapping DHCP addresses. Identified machines that were ARP storming and removed them. Expanded the DHCP pool so that we aren’t running out of addresses and confirmed that we had enough by checking the logs.
    More things I’ve done: Used Netspot to check signal strength and channel overlap and isolation. I have mapped the signal strength by location and we have strong signals to the various locations (the Linksys AP is 7 feet from the conference room). I have checked that the firmware is the most recent version.
    I can’t find any logical reason for the Macs (and pretty much only the Macs/Apple devices) to not be picking up DHCP info through the bridge mode devices. I would tell them to get another Extreme but they are going to be deploying a Cisco Meraki system soon and I suspect that this problem will persist since the Linksys was put in place because the last AP displayed the same behavior with the Macs picking up self-assigned IPs. Affected Macs range from 2010 era MBP and Air to 2013 MBP and Air and they are running OSX 10.8 through 10.10.
    As for the history of this network, I just walked into this company and know very little about how well it worked before, but apparently it has always been flaky according to the staff.

    I agree that something isn't right; I am going to cut over DHCP services from the Watchguard to the newly deployed OS X Server tonight and see  if that changes anything.
    On the other hand, faulty DHCP server/client settings doesn't explain why applying a static IP still leaves you with no connectivity. I think that clue is also fairly important but I can't figure out what would be blocking connectivity on a static IP setup.

  • IChat video conference question?

    I have a couple of and maybe some dumb questions.
    I manage a small office with 3 Dell desktop windows XP Pro computers and 2 Macs (1-iMac 1000GHz & 1-Powerbook G4 1000GHz, both 10.4.8) and one Savin Office scanner/copy machine. The one Windows XP computer works as the server for the Savin copier. All are assigned static IP addresses. I'm presently running a Linksys wireless router WRT54G. We have several other seperate locations associated with the business where we would like to be able to video conference with iChat.
    I use to be able to iChat (video & audio) with the office computers for about a year and a half from my office but after changing the Linksys router from an older non-wireless version to the newer wireless version WRT-54G vers. 5, I can no longer Video or Audio iChat with the office on either of the 2 Macs listed above (text chating is no problem). The 2 office computers can no longer Video or Audio iChat with any other locations any where (but they can within the office, machine to machine). After exhaustive research, I'm convinced it is the Router.
    I was thinking of getting the new Airport Extreme base station with N, that Apple is now advertising, to see if this works. My first question is, will it work with the Savin Office copier/scanner like the Linksys does? Is it any different in setting up than say the Linksys?
    Is this more of a HOME piece of equipment or can I really use it in an office setting that is truely cross platform. (all computers file share with each other, particularly with the one XP machine that is the server for the Savin scanner.)
    Will I have any problems at all with iChat.
    I know there are a lot of questions but I really don't want to spend the money and disrupt the office if there is any anticipation of problems.
    The business is a Day Care Center with 9 locations so the Video & Audio chat is important to the kids and the office personnel.
    If this will work flawlessly, I would go ahead and replace the 10 routers for the 10 different centers we have, so everyone can Video & Audio iChat.
    Thanks for your help.
    Jim

    I use to be able to iChat (video & audio) with the office computers for about a year and a half from my office but after changing the Linksys router from an older non-wireless version to the newer wireless version WRT-54G vers. 5, I can no longer Video or Audio iChat with the office on either of the 2 Macs listed above (text chating is no problem). The 2 office computers can no longer Video or Audio iChat with any other locations any where (but they can within the office, machine to machine). After exhaustive research, I'm convinced it is the Router.
    Might it be that you just don't have the proper ports opened on the Linksys router to allow for both the audio & video portions of iChat? The following site is a great tool in setting up ports for specific routers, including your Linksys: http://portforward.com/default.htm
    I was thinking of getting the new Airport Extreme base station with N, that Apple is now advertising, to see if this works. My first question is, will it work with the Savin Office copier/scanner like the Linksys does? Is it any different in setting up than say the Linksys?
    I am assuming that your Savin copier is Ethernet-enabled. Since the new AirPort Extreme Base Station (AEBS) provides three Ethernet LAN ports, it should function similiarly to the Linksys to provide network access to the Savin. Since it a different device, there will be differences on setup. For example, the previous AirPort base station relied on the AirPort utilities for setup...and not a web-based one like the Linksys do. This is expected to be the same for the new model.
    Is this more of a HOME piece of equipment or can I really use it in an office setting that is truely cross platform. (all computers file share with each other, particularly with the one XP machine that is the server for the Savin scanner.)
    I would treat the AEBS no different than your current Linksys. Would you consider the Linksys a "HOME" piece of equipment? The AEBS should fit in quite well in a business environment as it does in a home one.
    Will I have any problems at all with iChat.
    As long as you have the proper ports opened on BOTH your hardware AND software firewalls, should shoudn't have any problems with iChat.

  • Mini + DVI splitter = colored static (argh)

    What I want to do is mirror one of the video outputs of my Mini (one LCD on my desk, one on the conference table). I am already using both video outputs of the Mini (mini DVI and mini DP) to drive dual monitors (extended desktop mode) on my desk, so I have no spare video outputs.
    Previously, I was using a DVI splitter (takes one DVI in, sends two identical DVI signals out), but with the new mini I get one good DVI signal and one that's all colored static/snow. I have checked the functionality of the powered DVI splitter using an old Macbook, so that is working fine (can mirror to two displays). So the culprit is the new Mini.
    I suspect that the problem is the new HDCP encryption used in the Mini's video output. It would stand to reason that the Mini can only exchange encryption keys with one of the displays, so the other one will not be able to decrypt the video stream and thus display garbage (colored static/snow). This is annoying since this setup worked previously before Apple started using HDCP.
    Any ideas?
    I have yet to take this to the Genius Bar ...
    Message was edited by: kenmai

    Matt,
    It's been quite a while since I had this problem, so I was looking for my notes on fixing it. No luck there.
    The bottom line is that the "native" refresh rate on your KVM is far enough out of specs for your monitor that it's affecting the display. When you plug directly into the mini, the display automatically senses the correct refresh rate and looks fine.
    It's a hack, but here's what I did (after giving up on manually modifying the settings in Terminal and failing miserably):
    1. Plugged the display directly into the mini and created a "calibrated" color profile for it in both user and admin accounts.
    2. Connected the KVM and booted in safe mode, selected the "calibrated" color profile with appropriate resolution in all profiles.
    2b. Made sure I unchecked the +Show profiles for this display only+ box in the Display > Colors tab for all users.
    3. Plugged in the KVM and restarted in safe mode, doing 1 & 2 above.
    4. Restarted and manually set the color profile and resolution.
    It can take a few tries to get the settings to "stick."
    -Wayne

  • H323 static Nat doesn't work fine on 3900 series router with IOS 15.2(3) T

    Hi,
    I have a problem with static nat setting on my 3925 router with IOS15.2(3). The scenario is like this:
    I set a static nat between 172.16.1.2 and x.x.x.x(public IP address) using following command:
    ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.2 x.x.x.x
    The intranet IP address is set on a video conference system from Huawei, after setting all these things, ping works fine to this public IP address, but video conference cannot be built. I tried same setting using another 2811 router with IOS12.4 and it worked fine. Which means the problem should be isolated to this 3925 router. Full config is also attached, sorry that I elimated the public IP address and use other characters instead.
    Additionally, I debugged ip natting and I see following information when making video calls:
    router#debug ip nat h323
    IP NAT H323 debugging is on
    router#                
    *Jul 10 09:11:07.343: NAT[0]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
    *Jul 10 09:11:07.343: [NAT[0]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
    *Jul 10 09:16:15.731: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
    *Jul 10 09:16:15.731: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
    *Jul 10 09:16:57.215: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
    *Jul 10 09:16:57.215: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
    *Jul 10 09:17:02.731: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
    *Jul 10 09:17:02.731: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
    *Jul 10 09:17:14.731: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
    *Jul 10 09:17:14.731: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
    This problem has been bothering me for weeks. Hope that someone could help me out. Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Angran

    Hi,
    i have the same requirement for a customer, not for video but for audio calls, i have a remote office with h.323 phones and they need to get registered to a gk in central office to send and recieve voice calls, did you make it work? can you share the config please?

  • IChat video conference corporate firewall help please!

    Hi Folks,
    I'm trying to get an iChat video conference going, and I keep getting the pesky Error -8 problem. Here's the info i have:
    - My computer is an intel iMac. The other computer is an intel MacBook Pro, both have all software updates installed and built-in iSight cameras.
    - I am behind a corporate firewall. The other computer is not, but is on a very speedy internet connection.
    - Both mac firewalls are completely off.
    - I had corporate IT disable the firewall on the IP address of this computer (not even just the proper ports, but entirely disable it), and it's still giving me connection errors.
    Anybody got any idea what the heck I can do to get these computers to play nice?
    Thanks!
      Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    Hi loudguitars,
    Welcome to the Apple Discussions
    I apologise for any delay in getting to you.
    iChat requires that ports are open in a modem or any interveening router. This is in addition to any Firewall the device may have.
    These same ports need opening in any router or modem.
    In addition to this the System Preferences > Quicktime > Streaming tab speed setting neds to match your download speed or a max of 1.5Mb/T1/Intranet/LAN if you are faster.
    This will sometimes return error 8 although error 22 is more likely.
    Error 8 effectively tells you that the connection can not be made because the ports are not open.
    This in itself can be because of NAT problems.
    IF you have a Router and a separate moem that both use NAT (Port Forwarding, Port Triggering or DMZ) in combo at your end or yor Buddy does there will be problems. The Log tells you little as to which problem it actually is.
    If your ISP offers a VoIP service it may block port 5060 until you pay for their service. (Many ISPs believe only Internet phone services use this protocol).
    In further addition if you and your Buddy have not Used NAT more than once at your respective ens it can be that if you are both still using a method that involves NAT that the two devices still don't "Play Nicely" due to the fact there are about 6 different ways of doing NAT and you may have two device that just don't get on.
    If you have UPnP then use that.
    Note: If the ISP NATs the service to you (normally with NON static, DHCP issued IP addresses) then this will count as One NAT at your end.
    Apple did change iChat to version 3.1.5 with the 10.4.7 update. It was supposed to help in this area but I would say they moved in the wrong direction.
    If you have a modem that has QUality of Service (QoS) or Denial of Service Attack protection and the settings for this are something you can alter then consider increasing that size of the amount of data that can get through as this can impinge of iChat due to the amount of data in a Video conference.
    12:28 PM Wednesday; August 2, 2006

  • APEX 3.1 - Cache of Workspace Images or Static Files

    Hi,
    I attended the ODTUG Conference and they mentioned that in 3.1 Images and Static files (uploaded as shared components) are now cached. Where in the documentation does it state this? Can you configure the cache settings?
    Thank you,
    Martin

    Hi Joel,
    >> See....if you came to one of these conferences like OOW or ODTUG, I could …
    Yeah, rubbed it in, why don’t you :)
    >> It has nothing to do with the upload procedure …
    That was my mistake. I meant the downloading/delivery procedure.
    >> I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "free files"
    By “free” files, I meant data files that were uploaded to the database, like scanned documents etc., and not the classic static files like JavaScript, CSS, or the firm logo image.
    Now, with 3.1 native support of BLOB, and the rumors that your team is working on a revised version of the document library package, things might be simpler for issues like (simple) content management.
    >> Please let me know if this does not make sense.
    Tyler post came right on time, to fulfill your pseudocode explanation. After reading Tyler post, I better understand what you meant, and how I can achieve it. At first, I thought that all the HTTP header stuff id done for you, by some built-in or Oracle supplied package, but now I understand it’s the developer responsibly.
    One more thing about Tyler post, which was published prior to version 3.1. He mentioned the need to add some specific entries to the DAD, in order to utilize this technique:
    “If you’re using Oracle HTTP Server (Apache + mod_plsql), add the following lines to your Database Access Descriptor (DAD), then bounce OHS to apply your changes:
    PlsqlCGIEnvironmentList HTTP_IF_NONE_MATCH
    PlsqlCGIEnvironmentList IF_MODIFIED_SINCE “
    Is this still the case with 3.1? I don’t remember reading about these specific entries in the installation documentation. My current DAD don’t includes these entries, and still it seems like the caching of static files is working (I tested against apex.oracle.com).
    Thanks and regards,
    Arie.

  • What are the "Conference Calls" when you reach level 4?

    What are the "Conference Calls" once you reach level 4 on the Apple Support Communities? You can find the "Conference Calls" perk here:
    https://discussions.apple.com/static/apple/tutorial/reputation.html
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi Austin,
    https://discussions.apple.com/static/apple/tutorial/reputation.html
    Level 1  0-149
    Level 2  150-499         Report Post
    Level 3  500-999         Custom Avatar
    Level 4  1,000-3,999     Conference Calls
    Level 5  4,000-7,999     User Tips
    Level 6  8,000-19,999    Lounge Access, MVP Meetups
    Level 7  20,000-34,999
    Level 8  35,000-49,999
    Level 9  50,000-79,999
    Level 10 80,000+
    Level 1: nothing.
    Level 2: ability to report posts for non-compliance with the Terms of Use (or perhaps someone showing personal details).
    Level 3: custom avatar
    Level 4: Conference calls. I am not holding my breath. I have not been invited yet.
    And if a conference call means a phone call, Australia is +10 hours UTC (as in 10 hours ahead of Greenwich Mean Time, London, UK). I don't expect to be invited.
    If you enjoy reading questions and answers in these forums, keep doing it. As you read and learn, you will find: "Hey, I can answer that!" and the reward comes from the thanks, not the points.
    Regards,
    Ian

  • Conference Room Acoustics

    I have been given a task to reduce external noise as well as cure the echo problem in our conference rooms. I know zero about this so it's hard to get started. I did buy some soundproofing in one to see if it made a difference, it it did....slightly. Paid $200 for it, so it looks like it may be an expensive endeavor. The ceilings are pretty high, the furniture isn't anything that would absorb sound. The floor is hardwood, and the windows face the heart of Boston traffic. I'm looking for idea, but inexpensive ideas.
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    Hi,
    You are correct, the room acoustics are not ideal as per the following
    http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCud78163
    Enhance echo cancellation capabilities on 7937
    Symptom:
    Enhancement Request to improve the echo cancellation behavior on 7937 when installed at conference rooms with high acoustics.
    Conditions:
    Conference rooms with large glass walls would cause high acoustics.
    Workaround:
    Covering the glass walls with blinds and usage of dampeners would reduce the acoustics
    You can try the workaround above by placing dampeners on the glass walls and also by placing some static objects like flower pots, white boards, etc in the room.
    Regarding the g722 codec, if the region setting is g711 and both the endpoints involved in the call are g722 capable then g722 is chosen by default. The only consideration here is that for a conference call the software conference bridge will only support g711 codec. As you mentioned that lan calls are negotiating g722, it will be by the above logic, whereas for external calls the codecs defined on dial-peers and region settings with gateway / trunk will determine which codec is negotiated.
    HTH
    Manish

  • Sony's E3 press conference- mobile gaming IPhone/IPad?

    I just watched Sony's E3 press conference and they announced something called Playstation Suite/ Playstation Mobile that is coming to mobile devices. Which allows Playstation games to be played on any mobile device which I'd love on my IPhone and my new IPad.  They mentioned being on " The other mobile company phones" , but I didn't see any mention of Apple devices. Does this mean we won't have access to this HUGE list of games? Has Apple not agreed to be part of this? Or did they just forget to mention support for Apple devices? I always enjoyed Playstation games but I don't want to buy their portable device. And I don't want to jump to the other phone company ( they suck). Is there any way we can get Playstation mobile ? Hopefully Apple is currently in negotiations , if not , maybe we should ALL ask for it.

    https://discussions.apple.com/static/apple/tutorial/tou.html
    2. Submissions
    1. Stay on topic. Apple Support Communities is here to help people use Apple products and technologies more   
            effectively. Unless otherwise noted, do not add Submissions about nontechnical topics, including: 
    Speculations or rumors about unannounced products.
    Discussions of Apple policies or procedures or speculation on Apple decisions.
    3. Post constructive comments and questions. Unless otherwise noted, your Submission should either be a   
        technical support question or a technical support answer. Constructive feedback about product features is  
        welcome as well. If your Submission contains the phrase "I'm sorry for the rant, but…" you are likely in violation
        of this policy.

  • Lync 2010 Mediation Server Static Route

    Has anyone used this method for allowing NON enterprise voice users the ability to utilize the conference call back feature?
    http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/lync-dial-in-conferencing-static-route-configuration/
    If so, can you answer these questions?  We have deployed this successfully but with a few hiccups.
    When a non enterprise voice user uses the conference call back feature, the lync dial plans are ignored but the number is sent with a +1 in front of it.  Is there a way for the CUCM to strip off that +1 and add a 9 to it?  Whats the best way to accomplish this?
    When the conference does call them back, the caller ID displays their Lync number.  We would rather it display a different number.  Is this possible?  How could we accomplish this on the CUCM?
    Thanks!

    You can modify the trunk configuration using Lync Server 2013 Control Panel which were created using Lync Server 2010 Control Panel.
    You can set different Pool Trunks, defining the different features for each trunk.
    Lisa Zheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Jetpack 5510L needed for Polycom video conference - is this possible - has progress been made?

    We've has a successful connection when a static IP was available and we can at least connect to a bridge and see the template and the image of our own classroom in the top right corner, but we can not see or hear the far end and the far end cannot see or hear us.
    How should we approach this when the bridge is our only IP option to connect to?  What is required to make this connection complete on both ends?

    I would actually contact PolyCom since they are the video conference vendor that own the software you are attempting to use.  PolyCom most likely has experience dealing with VZW network connections and should be able to help you identify why their application is not working. 
    If you truly have a static and public IP address assigned to your Jetpack then the port forwarding options will be available to you.  You may have to customize the ports to get all of the video conferencing communication lines opened.
    If you can find a specific limitation from PolyCom then come back to us and let us know what it is.  We may be able to provide you with steps or suggestions on how to customize your Jetpack to work around them.  For now, the problem could be anything so VZW and the community really cant help you.

  • Live video conference over internet

    hi frndz,
    i have done a video conference application which works fine in LAN.
    i have a static IP server to host the video conference application.
    my problem is that i was not able to recieve the video transmitted from the server. in vise-versa if i send it from client which is in different network, i am able to recieve it frm the server using the public IP of my ISP,
    can any one help me how to transmit in rtp:// from server and how to recieve it in the client side
    i have checked this transimission and receiving by JMF studio and my code
    rgds
    -venkat

    hi,
    first get clear idea on JMF archietecture and wot it does,
    Start with creating a player,
    learn about processors, DataSource, realizing a player, media types supported by JMF and RTP protocol,
    by learning above things u ll be clear about how to start ur video conference app,
    for further clarification revert me back
    rgds
    -Venkat

Maybe you are looking for