Statical Indicator in EKPO.........

I have a query,
When we delete any line item of a PO then in table EKPO in field statical a indicator will be set.
but In my po there are 3 line items and which are not deleted but statical indicator is showing set.
can anybody suggest that whats the reason.

Hi
If a purchase order item is deleted, the item is marked as 'statistical' (field EKPO-STAPO = X) and the change is reflected in the header conditions. However, if for the item the final invoice indicator (EKPO-EREKZ) or the inward delivery completed indicator (EKPO-ELIKZ) is set, the item is not marked as 'statistical' (EKPO-STAPO is not set) and thus the header conditions are not updated.
Note 358293 contains report zkstapo to correct ekpo-stapo where thefield is set but no deletion indicator is set. Please run the report first in test system for the relevant document.
Regards,
Mauro

Similar Messages

So many status/indicator in 2LIS_02_ITM

i am using 2LIS_02_ITM and found there are so many status/indicator fields. Wondering which one I should restrict in DTP
(in order to reconcile with standard report ME2n)
1) EKKO-MEMORY (PO incomplete)
2) EKPO-LOEKZ (Deletion indicator)
3) EKPO-BSAKZ (Control indicator) --> value such T, R ---> What is it for ??
4) EKPO-STATU (PO status)

Hello,
For a Simple way out
Ask Business or funcational guys
waiting for your feedback
Regards
Nitin Bhatia

Deletion indicator is missing in the infocube

Hi,
I have a value k for filed (LOEKZ )deletion indicator in EKPO table but it is not getting extracted into Infocube.
regards,
kranthi

Hi ,
I have checke all the codes in the routines.
i didnot found any restrictions , but i am not finding the deletion indicator in the BW side.
can it be possible now please help me.
regards,
kranthi

Logic to chekc whether a PO is complete or not

Hi Sir,
I have to check the status of a PO...whether its complete(Y) or not(NO) by reading respective EBELN and validate the PO is closed and all the LINE ITEMS in the PO is PAID.
Please help me in writing logic for this.
Thanks
Krishan

Hi Krishnan,
<li>check the field ELIKZ "Delivery Completed" Indicator in EKPO table, if ELIKZ field is space then P.O is open and not Billed.
Thanks
Venkat.O

Table used in Pending PO List

Hi,
Please tell me which table is used in pending po list ( report me2m, me2L, me2n etc), we have to make zreport using Pending PO and Pending PR.
Regards
GR

Hi,
In addition we could also look into EKET table which contains po schedule line wise qty & received qty. If we minus wemng from menge it gives the po open qty. Also we need check delivery completed indicator in EKPO Table.
regards,
JP

Filter up Open PO

Dear All,
I have to create a report to display the data of open po based on payment term, GR stage (delivery status), delivery date and po issuance date. Can anyone please guide me how should i filter out the blocked po, deleted po and only display out the open po?
Thanks alot!
Best Regards,
PC

Hi,
I had check with the MM user, they didn't use EKKO-FRGKE or table T16FB.
If they want to block PO they will tick the delivery completed indicator, for delete indicator is EKPO-LOEKZ.
So I wrote :
IF NOT EKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
IF NOT EKPO-ELIKZ = 'X'. :
proceed my specify function.
but it seems like not functioning. I still can get blocked and deleted po from my report.

Archiving PO older MM_EKKO (purchase order)

Hello,
I need archiving PO older (more than 10 years old), but this PO when execute preprocessing program RM06EV47 and most of them can not be marked for deletion, for many reasons. Eg. e06(115) "Quantity delivered differs from qty. invoiced (Function not possible)" and other messages
I already tested with
Program: RWPOB001 (Transaction WPO1)
BADI: ARC_MM_EKKO_CHECK
But I can not mark it for deletion (prerequisite for archivign PO).
Is there a standard way to close that inconistentes Purchase order ?
I want to avoid
UPDATE EKKO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
Thanks
Edited by: Cervantes Nicolas on Oct 4, 2010 5:58 PM

Cervantes Nicolas wrote:
I need archiving PO older (more than 10 years old), but this PO when execute preprocessing program RM06EV47 and most of them can not be marked for deletion, for many reasons. Eg. e06(115) "Quantity delivered differs from qty. invoiced (Function not possible)" and other messages
If your PO shows E06(115), use transaction MASS, BUS2012 to flag both: EKPO-ELIKZ ("Delivery Completed" Indicator) and EKPO-EREKZ (Final invoice indicator). This should let the PO pass - I was in the same situation and finally managed to get rid of 98% of inconsistent PO's.
In addition: search in OSS for notes on the subject, especially with keyword RM06EV47 - there are a couple of notes explaining what to do to pass the prepare-run.

Material Document - Purchase Order

Hi SAP Experts,
I would like to raise a question which is related to an aged open item in a Stock in Transit GL account. I'm a SAP end user.
We used a customize transaction code to clear the open items in the SIT GL accounts but not all items are being cleared since the programs based its clearing on the assignment used in the postings and it is required to used the "Billing document header" as a detail in the assignment field.
I have used the transaction code VL03N to view the document flow of the Billing document number.
It seems that the transaction was already completed but no accounting document number has been posted to consider the transaction as close and available to clear.
I hope that i have raised my question in the right forum and provided enough details.
Many Thanks,
Jimmy

Hello, for your information, if PO line items with GR-based-IV indicator ON (EKPO-WEBRE) the MSEG-LFBNR field will be updated with the GR document number.
For PO line items without the GR-based-IV indicator, the MSEG-LFBNR field will remain blank.
Thats the standard behavior!
Cheers!
Plauto

Return Purchase Order Type

Hi,
I'd like to create a new Return PO type, what I want to know is, which parameter is the main parameter to decide the order type is a Return one?
Please kindly advise.
Best Regards.

Hi,
We have assigned to the return PO order type a different field selection key then for normal PO's. This field selection key has the field 'Return item' mandatory under the GR/IR control group
( see define screen layout at Document level ).
So for our return PO's, all items need to have the return indicator set ( EKPO-RETPO ).
This triggers the return behaviour of the item,
Hope it helps
regards
Dirk

100% Deleted Purchase Orders appearing on ME28 release screen

Scenario 1 - No problems!!
>   I create a PO (ME21N) which appears on the release screen (ME28)
>   I select all line items, click the trash can & save (ME22N).
>>The PO no longer appears on the release screen
Scenario 2 - Problems....
>   I create a PO (ME21N) which appears on the release screen (ME28)
>   I flag the "Final Invoice" indicator (field EKPO-EREKZ), select all line items, click the trash can & save (ME22N).
>>The PO remains on the release screen.
Can anyone assist?
I have set breakpoints in executed exits...couldn't find any problems
*I have traced Scenario 1 & 2 via the runtime analyser, downloaded the results & compared in excel with a vlookup...No differences of interest found

hi Trafford,
This is a good finding. Infact the system behaves in this way that if the Final Invoice is ticked and if the PO item is deleted, it still appears in ME28.
I think this is standard functionality, that system expects an invoice when the final invoice is ticked so it is still active in ME28. But when you try to post invoice it will certainly not allow as the items will be deleted.
Iooks like its a bug in SAP and you may want to contact SAP for this.
Regards
Seema

Downpayment clearing not appearing at MIRO

Dear All,
After activating LOG_MMFI_P2P business function and doing advance payment through me2dp anf fpdp_create , downpayment clearing button is not apeearing at the time of MIRO.
Suggestion is helpfull.

Hi Rajendra,
Are you using a Service PO.
Downpayment functionality is not available for srevice PO.
Below is the technical reason behind it.
==================
First let us not fully compare the working of a material PO with a
service PO, and that too in this specific scenario where we have the
Srv. based IV indicator set(EKPO-LEBRE), as both of them accomplish
different business requirements and the MM-SRV design has been very
carefully integrated into the MM-PUR core, so that the usability of
procuring materials or services looks seamless.
Since we can only provide a PO reference while doing downpayments and
not service line level information like PACKNO and INTROW, the
downpayments are posted for the account assignment of the PO and not
with respect to each service line.
Seeing the design we confirmed that this new EhP4 functionality of
executing downpayment clearing from MIRO, is actually not available
for this scenario due to their technical limitations. During MIRO, the
design to read the PO data is based on each service line's information,
and since for a particular service line we wont be able to fetch the
downpayments done against it, we cannot pass on the data to MM Invoice
Verification, and only if they receive a downpayment value at their
side, they will be able to show the "Down payment clearing" button in
MIRO.
So could you please make use of transaction like FB05 and F-54 to clear
the downpayments.
==============
regards,
Lalita

PLANT NOT AVAILABLE DURING MIGO PURCHASE ORDER

Hello,
When selecting a PO during MIGO

Hello, for your information, if PO line items with GR-based-IV indicator ON (EKPO-WEBRE) the MSEG-LFBNR field will be updated with the GR document number.
For PO line items without the GR-based-IV indicator, the MSEG-LFBNR field will remain blank.
Thats the standard behavior!
Cheers!
Plauto

Status of particular WBS, whether complete or not with Dates?

Dear All,
Can any one tell me , how to know what is status of particular WBS with Dates , and T code for download Stagewise WBS with cost

Hi Krishnan,
<li>check the field ELIKZ "Delivery Completed" Indicator in EKPO table, if ELIKZ field is space then P.O is open and not Billed.
Thanks
Venkat.O

How to shorten cache job?

Hi,
I have a web report which takes 6 mins to run after dataload and I want to shorten it to 2 mins. I tried to use report agent's cache to improve the performance, but it takes over 1 hr to complete (the datalod is 3 times / day, so 1 hr cache job is too long). Can anybody help and tell me how to improve the performance for the web report - cache job can be reduced to less than 30mins.
Thanks, Jin Freda

Jin,
check the query / template you are using for the caching - maybe it can be filtered down ??
instead of using the cache - try precalculating the query and populating the templates as static HTML using the STATIC indicator for the template...
Arun
Hope it helps...

After I downloaded ios7 for my ipad2, the native weather app disappeared...

Anyone with any suggestions/ideas?

It's looks different . . . From Appleinsider:
One of the most significant aesthetic changes in iOS 7 is found in the iPhone's native Weather application, which has been redesigned with moving three-dimensional graphics that illustrate the current conditions.
Many will first notice that the Weather icon no longer has a static indicator of 73 degrees. That potentially confusing decision, which lasted for years on the iPhone home screen, has been removed, and the new icon simply shows a cartoonish sun partly covered by a cloud.
Upon opening the application, the changes are immediately apparent: The entire background is an animation mimicking the current weather conditions. On a mostly sunny day, clouds will slowly drift by, while thunderstorms will bring down strikes of lightning from the virtual sky.
The animations even reflect the current time, with darker nighttime animations and brighter conditions during the daylight as clouds float or snow falls.

Statical Indicator in EKPO.........

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for