Statistical GR ( MIGO)

Hi All,
In third party process we do Statistical GR (MIGO).I want to know that how we do that.Means what is the meaning of Statistical GR ( MIGO).
Regards
Prabudh

Thanks AKPT for reply
As advised , pleae find enclosed screens for OMS2, PO and FI entry. FI entry might be wrong as while posting MIGO ..I was getting error "WE etnry is missing in table YFTFI_SUBST236 and I maintained some dummy GL accounts.
Regards
Arvind

Similar Messages

How to creat commitment for PO PR but not creat statistical cost for GR

Hi,
Quantities and Values in Valuated Project Stock: Example - Material - SAP Library
Planning
Material FIN-M is assigned to network activity V10 and is managed in the project stock for WBS element P/4711.1.
The network type is flagged as appended and apportioned to the WBS.
Before the first MRP planning run or before the planned orders are converted into purchase requisitions or production orders, the following amounts appear in WBS element P/4711.1:
Planned costs of $500,00
Remaining order plan value of $300,00
The MRP controller begins by converting the planned orders. First, the planned order for the material RAW-M is converted into a purchase requisition and the planned order for the material SEMI-M is converted into production order A2.The order type is flagged as not appended and apportioned to the WBS.The remaining order plan value in the WBS element changes by the amount of the internal activities portion of production order A2 to $400,00 (300,00 + 100,00).After the purchase requisition is converted into a purchase order, a cost commitment of $50,00 also appears in WBS element P/4711.1.
External Procurement
Valuated goods are received for the purchase order, but the price is $10 different at $60. Assuming that material RAW-M is price-controlled, this gives rise to a debit posting of $60,00 in the stock account and credit posting of $60 in the GR/IR clearing account (Financial Accounting).If the inventory accounts was created as a cost element in CO, the following appear in WBS element P/4711.1:
Statistical actual costs of $60,00 in the stock cost element
A cost commitment of $0,00
If material RAW-M is price-controlled the standard price is $50,00, the postings in Financial Accounting are: $50,00 debit to a stock account $10,00 debit to a price difference $60,00 credit to the GR/IR clearing account
In this case, the only figure in the WBS element would be statistical actual costs of $50,00.
Above excerpt from SAP help, may I know how to do configuration to creat commitment for PO PR but not creat statistical cost for GR?
Thanks and regards,
Ray

Hello Jie,
if i right assuming your query then PR->PO= Commitment should be created.
but GRN by MIGO=Statistical cost should not create once MIGO if right then actual cost would be 0.
you can activate commitment by OKKP transaction.
And you want to cost should not be statistical after MIGO right?
here solution is cost never statistical type until account assignment object not statistical type this is my assumption.
if this is the issue then check G/L account from the PO. then check that G/L account, whether it is a B/S account or P&L account? I think you have wrongly assigned P&L account.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Stock is increased and FI entry is posted in statistical GR for third party

Hello
I was trying to activate the functionalty for statistical GR in third party but STUCK due to following issues. For enabling this functionaltity I have checked "Goods Reciept" and "GR Non-Valuated" check in "Delivery tab" of PO.
1. After creating Statistical GR through MIGO (101), stock has been posted in plant. I was expecting no movement in Stock .
2. I was hoping there should not be in FI posting but FI entry is posted through statistical GR .
We are using third party process from many years but without statistical GR. Requirement from client is to post statistical GR without FI entry and no stock should be updated. Please advise if anyone has idea on this.
FYI--We have item category TAS and schedule line category CS in customisation. Also advise if above two settings in PO are enought to turn ON the statistical GR functionality.
Thanks for your help.
Regards
Arvind

Thanks AKPT for reply
As advised , pleae find enclosed screens for OMS2, PO and FI entry. FI entry might be wrong as while posting MIGO ..I was getting error "WE etnry is missing in table YFTFI_SUBST236 and I maintained some dummy GL accounts.
Regards
Arvind

Cannot do MIGO in Third Party Sales Process with shipping notification

In the Third party sales process with Shipping notification,the item category for the material is TAS (Billing relevance=R),item category group is BANS.
Intially sales order is created,then using me21n with reference to purchase requisation purchase order is created,then in MIGO stage i used the PO No there but i get the message no item found in PO.
what adjustment have to be done in order to do MIGO

Refer following SDN thread, by that you will be able to get overview on best practices about Third Party Sales & necessary configuration you need to follow for statistical GR:
- Third party direct shipment (II)
Further maintain Billing Relevance for Item Category as G - Order-related billing of the delivery quantity.
Regards
JP

Import PO - MIGO accounting entries not coming as required .

Dear Team ,
During Import PO , i have completed MIRO for planned delivery costs .. i have then gone to complete MIGO
while doing this MIGO , i find that Material - Dr and GR/IR clearing - Cr which is correct
but the problem is the planned delivery costs for which i earlier created MIRO is also added into the material value and each of them has to get displayed separately at the time of MIGO ( as each is assigned to separate accounts ) ... but right now all these planned delivery costs are getting added to the material value and is shown as 1 figure in GR/IR clearing account .
what settings are to made so that the planned delivery costs included in the GR/IR clearing to be shown separately ?
example :
__existing :__
after MIGO ,
Material - 50000 ngn ( Dr)
GR/IR clearing - 50000 ngn ( Cr)
*expected :*
after MIGO ,
Material - 50000 ngn ( Dr )
GR/IR clearing - 40,000 ngn
GIT Duty - 5,000 ngn
GIT Insurance - 5,000 ngn
Please suggest ..
Thanks ,
Mike

HI
check following points for your condition in M/06
Condition class =A
Calculate. Type=A
Condition Category=B ( Delivery cost)
Accurals
and check in M/08
Statistical
Assign Accurals and account key
IN po check you are assigen vendor to that condition ,click on details of condition in po and assign vendor
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Migo and Delivery for Third Party Shipment

I have configured third party shipment with statistical goods receipt.
Due to government regulation (Mexico) we need to keep track on our inventory of this movement so I want to configure MIGO so the receipts are done with 101 E - Special Stock and after that a Delivery and Invoice
If I try to do this I get error MIGO057 - Movement Type 101 E is not planned, I have take a look into OMJJ
Should I change item line from TAS to TAB? And schedule line from CS to CB? Somebody has done this any tips?
Thanks in advance,
Carlos

Hi,
Please check in the PO, the account assignment category should be 1, i think it is E and hence creates the error
Please check the third party account assignment category and change the PO account assignment category and try to do MIGO
Please do that and revert if you need more details

Funds Mangement - Fund center derivation error at the time of PO/MIGO

Hello -
Generally ,If FM account assignements are available in purchase requisition , same should be carried to purchase order and to the good receipts. But I am getting an error at the time of PO or MIGO that " Fund center not derived'. Why this happening ? What can I do to avoid this problem. can I create a step in the derivation to keep the original FM assignments from the previous documents....is there something to do with field status??
Thanks in Advance
Chris

Hi
Please read carefully tye warehouse concept
Excample warehouse concept II
>At PR no FM update
>At PO no FM update
>AT GR no FM update
>AT consumption on Cost center, WBS or Internal order FM is updated and AVC is checked
Read the release note of ERP 6 or ERP5 the customising of Warehouse concept is well explained
In sumary:
Create a stock commitment item statistically
Create a warehouse funds center
Create a funds
Create a derivation rule for warehouse concept 2
Create a derivation rule where you have plant, valuation class and warehouse funds center
Cretae a derivation rule fund>warehouse funds center>stock commitment item
Go in customising integration to make field status for assignement FM account asignments
Select PO and PR and make optional the funds, funds cenbter, commitment item
And when you will create a PR or PO FM data will come automatically
ciao
Salvator
PSM-FM Consultant
BXL

VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO

Hi all,
We have to change de Automatic PO generated in Shipment costs for Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt.
We have applied de SAP Note 427944.
. M/06
Condition type: 'B' delivery costs (T685A-KNTYP field)
Accrual: 'X' (T685A-KRUEK field)
Copy shp.costs: 'X' (T685A-BNKTK field)
. Entries in the calculation schema: (IMG -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price- Determination Process -> Define Calculation Schema)
In the calculation schema, an
1. Account key (T683S-KVSL1 field)
2. Account key - accruals/provisions (Field T683S-KVSL2)
must be specified for the corresponding condition type (similar to the FRB1 condition type in schema RM0000). Note that this condition is always marked as 'statistical' in the condition screen of the purchase order regardless of the settings in the price schema because it is an accrual.
. Purchase order: The condition type should not be valuated in the purchase order item, that is, the condition value is 0.
. Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected
shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     C transferred
. In T_56 the
u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST is D Release shipment cost item
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status are only
Calculated      C Fully calculated     but in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them the status are
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     A Not transferred   and in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
The process is :
ME21N
VL31N
VT02N (automatically)
VI01 (no PO automatically as before)
MIGO material GR for the inbound delivery of VL31N AND accounting of the delivery costs. THE ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS is missing why??
Someone can help?
Cheers
marta

Hi,
Just to clarify my questions. In the note 427944 explain that
1 . Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
*It means that the 3 status must be : Calculated C Fully calculated + Assigned C Account assignment fully completed + Transferred C transferred ?*
Other thing:
2 *. In T_56 the u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST must be D Release shipment cost item?*
3. In T_56 If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status showed in VI01 are only Calculated C Fully calculated b
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them in VI01 the status are Calculated C Fully calculated /Assigned C Account assignment fully completed / Transferred A Not transferred. *Why I can not do the transfer?*
as is Transferred A Not transferred them in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS.
Could you help me with one of these three questions?
Thank you very much,
marta

MIGO IN THIRD PARTY

IN THIRD PARTY TRANSACTION CAN WE HAVE STASCTICAL MIGO FOR ANALYSIS PURPOSE?
IF YES PROVIDETHE STEPS FOR CONFIGURATION.

Hi,
in the third party scenario there is no physical goods movement.if u want to do statistical GR
then do this configuration.
goto material management-purchasing-account assignment-maintain account assignment categories
in this select ur account assignment category 1: goto details-select goods receipt check box.then save.then do the trasaction.
if it helps pls do the reward points
thsnks&rewards
veera.

Error while doing GR against SA using MIGO

Hi Experts,
I am trying to do GR against scheduling agreement but getting error message as "Document $scheduling agreement$ dose not contains any selectable items"
I checked in SA, schedule lines are already there & also the open quantity is there.
Any idea is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!!
Best Regards,
Sachin Patil

Check OSS notes - Note 886735 - MIGO: Unclear why GR is not possible for the purchase order.
From OSS notes..
Solution
The ZCHECKPO analysis report allows the user to enter a certain interval or an interval from purchase orders or scheduling agreements to be checked. In addition, you can also select a certain interval or an interval from purchase orders or scheduling agreements to be checked.
Carry out the following checks using the report:
1. Check the document category
Information: The document category 'F' is possible for purchase orders and the document category 'L' is possible for scheduling agreements.
2. Check that the purchase order/scheduling agreement is not deleted.
3. Check that the purchase order/scheduling agreement is not blocked.
4. Check whether the purchase order/scheduling agreement is released.
5. Check that the purchase order is not held.
6. Check whether the goods receipt is already posted.
7. Is there a purchase order for external service?
8. Is there a blanket purchase order?
9. Is there a text item?
10. Is there a statistical item?
11. Is the goods receipt indicator set in the purchase order/scheduling agreement?
12. Check whether the confirmation control is active and whether a confirmation is still not available.
13. Is there a valid scheduling agreement delivery schedule line?

Third Party - Statistical GR

Hi,
Is there any configurational settings needs to be done in processing a Statistical Gr for a Third Party Purchase Order.
I had done all of the settings in the SD module, created a Sales Order which in turn created a PR in background & Converted the PR to the PO with the account assignment category and item category as Third party.
But when i have tried to make a GR, the system throws a message stating that there is no items selectable in the PO but the PO is sill open.
Could any one help me in getting the configurational settings needs to be carried to process a Statistical GR for a Third Party Purchase Order.
Regards,
DilliB

hi,
Here is the explanation of confirmation control key.
Confirmation control key
Determines which confirmation categories are expected for a PO item (e.g. order acknowledgment, shipping notification).
Procedure
Enter the key containing the confirmation categories agreed with the vendor.
Dependencies
If you enter a key and select Acknowl. reqd, you can have messages issued to vendors urging them to submit overdue order acknowledgments (acknowledgment expediters). Other confirmation categories cannot be expedited in this way.
you need to create inbound delivery ie confirmation of goods have been delivered to customer place thru t code VL31N and then do MIGO after that.
If you are not following the process you deselect that confirmation control key and do MIGO.
Thanks
Suresh

Third Party STO - GI as statistical

Hi Guys,
I have a requirement where process is a third party process and i want the GI part as statistical . is there any configuration where i can maintain the GI as statistical . the below entities are involved
1. DC
2. Vendor
3. Store
1. Creating STO --> From the supply company to the Site
2. 3rd Party SO
3. PO (3rd party SO)
4. Goods Receipt(w.r.t PO)
5. LIV (wr.t PO)
6. Billing (w.r.t 3rd party SO)
7. Delivery ( w.r.t STO) - (I want this to be statistical)
Regards
Ashish Philip

hi,
Here is the explanation of confirmation control key.
Confirmation control key
Determines which confirmation categories are expected for a PO item (e.g. order acknowledgment, shipping notification).
Procedure
Enter the key containing the confirmation categories agreed with the vendor.
Dependencies
If you enter a key and select Acknowl. reqd, you can have messages issued to vendors urging them to submit overdue order acknowledgments (acknowledgment expediters). Other confirmation categories cannot be expedited in this way.
you need to create inbound delivery ie confirmation of goods have been delivered to customer place thru t code VL31N and then do MIGO after that.
If you are not following the process you deselect that confirmation control key and do MIGO.
Thanks
Suresh

Availability control on statistical WBS element

Hi everybody,
The issue deals with availability control on statistical WBS element.
Part 1 : I released 25000 as budget (CJ32) for a statistical WBS element.
Availability control is active for this WBS element.
We made a good receipt (MIGO) for 20000 on an AUC (asset under
construction) - so we get the value as statistical value on the WBS
element -, then invoice verification (MIRO) and finally the asset
transfer (ABUMN) from asset under construction to fixed asset.
On this statistical WBS element we get +20000 (MIRO) and -20000 (ABUMN).
The problem is that the amount that is used for the availability check
is 0, instead of 20000 as you can check !!!
We set a budget on the statistical WBS element in order to have the
availability check ... and this is not working as the system in the described case shows 25000 as available but for me we should have only 5000 (= 25000 - 20000).
Part 2 : This is working perfectly (I get the expected value for available) when we use a "real" WBS element, put an expense on it, then run the period end closing tranction CJ88 in order to transfer the cost on an AUC, and finally run CJ88 again in order to transfer from AUC to fixed asset.
Did anybody already encountered this problem with statistical WBS element ? How did you solve this (we would like to keep our statistical WBS element) ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Benjamin

Hi Benjamin,
Pl go through the link below :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/3e/a98337dd34ca76e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
I have not faced this but as far as I remeber for AUC Statistical assignments have some limitations.
Any specicfic reason for keeping the WBS Statistical? Are you able to see "0" zero on this WBS in CN41.
Regards,
Sudhanshu
PS: Assign points as a way to say thanks.
Cheers,
Sudhanshu

No costs visible statistical WBS element

Hi,
The followin steps are the setup:
- Project with a statistical WBS element and a network below
- Create a PO with Account category "Fixed Asset"
- Fill in a fixed asset, but also a (statistical) WBS element (put fields 'project' and 'network' optional in customizing)
- execute a MIGO to book costs
Now when I run the cost report for this project using transaction CJI3 then I do NOT get the costs visible on this statistical WBS element.
HOWEVER when I do the same steps, but instead of putting a statistical WBS element I put the network (next to the fixed asset) then I do get the costs visible.
Is this normal or do I have to change something in order to get the costs visible for my statistical WBS element?
kindest regards
bert

It is normal

No costs visible for statistical WBS element

Hi,
The followin steps are the setup:
- Project with a statistical WBS element and a network below
- Create a PO with Account category "Fixed Asset"
- Fill in a fixed asset, but also a (statistical) WBS element (put field 'project' optional in customizing)
- execute a MIGO to book costs
Now when I run the cost report for this project using transaction CJI3 then I do NOT get the costs visible on this statistical WBS element.
HOWEVER when I do the same steps, but instead of putting a statistical WBS element I put the network (next to the fixed asset) then I do get the costs visible.
Is this normal or do I have to change something in order to get the costs visible for my statistical WBS element?
kindest regards
bert

Is this necessary?
Because in the end I want to book these costs as actual costs on my fixed asset...

Statistical GR ( MIGO)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for