Statistical indicator in Pricing schema.

All,
Can anyone explain the relevance of 'statistical ' indicator in pricing schema in simple terms with some examples ?
regards

Hi Sandeep
Consider this:
PBXX 100.00
RB00Discount 5.00
If you have above in PO conditions, the price in item overview will be 95.00 (100-5.00) which is net price.
If RB00 above is statistical in pricing schema, then the net price would have been 100.00
It works similar way for surcharges also (surcharge increase netprice while discounts reduce it when compared to your basic price)
You can also use it in quotations to define dummy conditions for loading to calculate landing cost without really affecting the price given to vendor.
Best regards
Ramki

Similar Messages

Manual and Statistical Indicator in Pricing

Hi
What is the significance of Manual and Statistical Indicator in Pricing.
Regards

Hi,
Statistical key
This indicator causes a surchage or discount to be set in the document statistically (that is, without altering the value).
If you tick statistical key then that will not be consider while calculating net price.
For Eg: You have created one Purchase Order the PB00 gross price is 1000 and the discount is 50. Then this Discount part will not taken into FI account.
Regarding Manual
If a condiiton type is marked "Manual" in Pricing that will not get proposed automatically in PO condiitons, you have to manully select the condiiton from F4 help and maintain the value against it untill you maintain condiiton record for the same.
You can see in Pricing procedure there are two condition types PB00 (Autoamtic) & PBXX (Manual & doesnot contains any Access Sequence)
If you check the manual box against PBXX then you have to enter the condition manually in po. It will not populate auto.
Reg,
Ashok
Rewards welcome

Statistical Indicator check in MM pricing.

I have not put a statistical indicator in MM pricing still.The condition shows as statistical.Can you help me to find how this statistical indicator is autogenerated.

Remove the "Accruals" check box in the condition type configuration. If the condition type itself is flagged as "accrual" it will appear statistical.
Edited by: Matthew Hiram Rose on Dec 14, 2010 11:58 PM

About Account Key of MM Pricing Schema

Dear Experts,
I found that in MM pricing schema, there are column called Account Key. I try to specify 1 pre-defined account key (FRE) to my condition type in the schema. However, this account key does not work because the GL account in MIGO transaction is assigned by GL account i defined for movement type 101 (i did it by simulation tool in SAP SPRO). Please let me know the setting sothat this account key work.
By the way, I also have related question about this account key: I want to add 1 condition type in my pricing procedure, the value will be post during MIGO or MIRO, but its value will not affect to Goods amount (expected FI posting will be: Dr GL account, Cr Vendor account) . As I know, for freight or customs charge, the value will affect Goods amount.
Thanks in advance,

Hi
The account key you have mentioned or any account key which is pre_defiend or customised are generally used ot have accraul posting corresponding to a particular condition value. This accrual key is linked to a G/L account in the OBYC transaction and is different from the G/L account you have used.
101 acct, that is your Inventory account - BSX - is an Inventory or Stock account, while for the accrual keys you normally assign a clearing account. Have a word with your FI guy and re_assign the key with a different account.
Second case if your value is getting added In MIGO/MIRO than that is correct only, you can not stop it getting added for the conditon unless until you activate the Statistical indicator Indicator for the condition type in the calculation schema.
Regards

Pricing schema for purchase info records

hi guys!
does anyone knows either SAP standard got function to define pricing schema for PIR? if yes, can you please tell me how to set it up step by step?
Thanks a lot,
crystal.

Hi,
there is no separate pricing schema for reading info records.
When creating PO, the system first searches for a purchasing
info record with the combination of vendor/material at purchasing
organization/plant level. If there is no such info record, the system
then search at purchasing organization level. If there is no such
info record here either, you must enter it manually.
If the purchasing info record exist, then valid conditions have
priority during price determination. If an info record does not
contain any conditions or invalid conditions, the system read from
last purchasing document in the info record and then suggest the price
from here. The price determined in this way are default values that
can be changed by the buyer if necessary.
You can save useful quotation data for a material in purchasing
info record. The info record can be created automatically by
setting the info update indicator during quotation maintenance
in the item detail.
Please first check is there any valid info record exist for this
material/vendor. You can always create/change/view it manually
via Ta ME11/ME12/Me13.
Please read also the notes 392988, 456691.
Regards,
Edit

Pricing schema

Dear All,
In my import pricing procedure i have condition type PB00 & another condition type ZXYZ (this condition type is like PB00)...the need of this Z condition type is we need our CVD price to be calculated on the price user will enter against the Z condition type.
Now initially we were seeing that whenever we are using both the condition types then the Net column in the condition tab was populated by the price entered against the last condition type i.e. lets say we have entered 20 usd against PB00 & 10 usd against ZXYZ then the Net column was been populated by 10 usd & not 20 usd.
To solve this we kept subtotal D against PB00 & Calculation type 12 against ZXYZ (subtotal field has been kept blank)...this solved our issue but now what we are seeing that by doing this the CVD is getting calculated over PB00 & not over ZXYZ though the From & To against the CVD condition types has been kept over ZXYZ.
What needs to be done to achieve this?
Regards,
Indranil

Solved...just checked the statistical indicator only for ZXYZ & removed subtotal D against PB00 & removed alternate calculation type 12 against ZXYZ
Regards,
Indranil

Dealer pricing schema

Hi,
I have created the dealer pricing schema in that I have included ZADC condition by coping JADC condition and configured into the schema.
And accordingly I have created PO and I have entered the ZADC value manually but at the time of doing MIGO, ZADC value not fetching into ADC column in excise tab.
I have checked the tax code and tax procedure (TAXINJ) also in that I have putted the value as below
JM01 u2013 100%
JAO1 u2013 100 %
JEC1 u2013 2%
JA1S u2013 1%
Please suggest
Regards
Rahul

Hi,
Why separate calculation schema for dealer scenarios!
You can have one domestic calculation schema where net price will be calculated and tax details flow from tax procedure with the help of tax code in the Purchase Order.
For dealer scenarios, at the time of PO creation, user do not know the excise value and PO created with a value with VAT/CST .During Goods receipt, the excise value are entered manually after knowing /getting excise invoice details.
For example:
Basic Price of material: 100
Excise Amount passed by dealer
BED: 10
Ecess: 2.
SEcess: 1.
=113.00
CST 2%
=115.26
Create PO for Dealer Vendor with Base Price as 113./- by selecting tax code which is having CST as 2% (Total PO value will be 115.26)
& do MIGO, select MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab, Enter Assessable value 100/- as in Excise tab Item level and enter the all excise values BED(10), ECess(2) , SECess(1) manually, check all values & save the document.
And finally go for MIRO ,use proper tax code( tax code in PO & tax code in MIRO must be different and MIRO tax code represents 10%BED,2%Ecess, 1%SEcess and 2%CST)),selecting calculate tax check box, edit base value as 100/-enter the amount in header as proposed by the system (115.26), simulate & post the document.
Regards,
Biju K

Problem in pricing schema

hi all,
i am using a new pricing schema its a copy of RM00000, there i have added a condition type for deposit, but the amount the deposit is adding up in net value of pricicng procedure, but during invoice the deposit amount is not considered, only the product price in Pb00 is caluated.
plz help me with this....
Regards
SANA

Hi
check the condition type used for the deposit amount.
What is the Condition category used for the Condition type.
Which condition type did you use in Copying to Deposit.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Questions about CIN tax procedure choice and pricing schemas

Hi all,
I have to implement SAP on a Indian company and I'm verifying all particularity about this country (in particular tax procedures and the great number of differents tax conditions used).
I have two questions about tax procedures and pricing schemas. Every feedback about thse points will be appreciated.
a) To choose tax procedure TAXINN or TAXINJ which are the elements that I have to consider?
I have read lot of documentation about CIN implementation and Iu2019m oriented to choose TAXINN schema, but If possible I would to understand better which are on behalf of one choice or another.
b) To define pricing schemas for India, after check with local users and using examples of documents (in particular tax invoice) actually produced, I have understood that taxes have to be applied on amount defined starting from price list, minus discounts recognized to customer plus surcharges eventually to bill (packing, transport, etc.).
Itu2019s correct for any type of taxes that tax amount is calculated on u201Cnet valueu201D defined at item level or there are exceptions to this rule?
Thanks in advance
Gianpaolo

hi,
this is to inform you that,
a) About point 1 I know the difference between the 2 tax procedures (conditions or formulas). I also have read in others post in the FORUM that TAXINN is preferable. So I would to understand which are the advantages to choose instead TAXINJ. There are particular reasons or it'a only an alternative customizing setting?
a.a. for give for posting the link : plese give me the advantages of TAXINJ and TAXINN
CIN - TAXINN and TAXINJ
b) About point 2, to define which value has to be used as base amount to calculate taxes isn't a choice, but is defined depending by fiscal requirement of the country, in this case India fiscal requirement. I know that, as Lakshmipathi
write as answer on my question, exception could be, but it was important for me to understand if I have understood correctly the sequence of the pricing condition in the schema in "normal" situation.
b.b. you can create your own pricing procedure for this and go ahead.
hope this clears your issue.
balajia

Can we add new condition in old PO with new pricing schema

We have created new pricing schema for addition of new condition type at header level on
25/11/2010 in client server but the problem is for old purchase order client want new condition
on header condition tab.It is obvious that in old po on analysis tab it shows old pricing schema.
Is there any solution to get new condition in old Purchase order????
It means we can add new condition in old po???
Regards
Jyoti Thakur

Jyoti,
Let me know the basic Price Condition if its PB00 or PBXX.
Let me know how you have called the pricing schema. if you had attached it with document type and you have changed the document type, you will be required to create new PO with new doc type.
If you have taken Vendor Schema group as a criteria, then you will be required to end the validity of old pricing conditions in condition table and need to activate new conditions on this date.
Check for other basic keys like Purchasing Organization as well.
Let me know if you have any existing Source List or QA for the vendor too.
Thanks and Regards
Raghavan

Condition types substraction in pricing schema

How to substract two condition types to get another condition value.
ZD01 contion type value-200
ZD02 contion type value-500
ZD03 Condition type value= 500-200
How to map this in the pricing schema
Regards
Umapathy.M

Can you try making the 2nd condition as a discount condition and then create a subtotal from 1st to 2nd.
ZD01 contion type value-200
ZD02 contion type value-500 >> make this a discount (negative) Copy std condition R002 for absolute discount.
ZD03 Condition type value= 500-200 >> Subtotal 1 to 2 will give the results you want.

Different Pricing Schema in PO and PIR for same vendor and material

Dear Experts,
I am facing an issue related to MM.
I have a vendor and a material under a plant, purchase Org, purchase group.
When we are creating a Purchase Info Record (PIR), it is picking one pricing schema, while when creating PO for same vendor and material, it is picking another different pricing schema.
As per my knowledge, pricing schema in PO is picked as per pricing schema group of Vendor and I believe same applies for PIR as well. I have only one vendor pricing schema group.
Because of this issue, I have to manually key-in condition values in PO for all condition types even though I have maintained a purchase info record.
Please suggest, what can be reason.
Regards,
Praveen

Hi,
Thanks for clearing my doubts.
However, I stuck-up in another issue.
Problem is that condition type- PB00 is linked with almost all pricing schemas.
Hence, I can't change pricing procedure in condition type- PB00.
Also, I can't include all J* related condition types in RM0002 as well.
Hence, if PB00 remains as RM0002 and I maintain my pricing procedure- ZJIMPO to all J* condition types, still I am not able to create PIR for all J* conditions. Error "Condition type J1CV is not in procedure A M RM0002".
How to handle this issue? Please suggest.
Thanks
Praveen

Pricing schema / price detemination

Hi Folks,
Im having some issue understanding pricing in MM.
Pricing schema - Is it defined in info records under the tab "conditions" or is it defined in SPRO under " define calculation schema" ?
In "Define calculation scehma" under "control data" what do all those fields stand for ? I dont see any document online explaining the same.
When we create a standard PO which pricing procedure does the system pick up , the pricing schema for the condition record for Vendor/plant/material whihc we have entered or the one defined for standard PO "NB" ? if both combinations are entered then which one does the system give preference to?
where do we make the assignment between Document type and pricing schema?
Is the prcing in MM the same as in SD?
Can someone explain the flow step by step for MM once the org structure has been created , and now we need to have a pricing procedure for standard PO along with price determination for time dependant condition along with scales.
Thanks

Hi,
>>Pricing in MM and SD are two separate procedure with different functionalities (basically one is for procurement and other for selling)
>> Pricing in MM has to be defined in IMG>> Mat Mgt>> Purchasing>> Conditions>> Define Price determination process.. where you will find cust nodes.
>> Pricing procedure is determined on the basis of PO Doc type, Purch Org and Vendor schema group
>> In Controll data for a given pricing schema, what you find is the procedure how the final price of the item is calculated using Condition Types such as (PB00, PBXX, RA01, FRA1 so on) which you have to read and know how they help determine the price of the product in a document.
You can have lot of info available over various sap dedicated sites and SAP help as well..
Check the link below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee1fa755c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Hope it helps
Regards
Shiva

Pricing Schema for Project System

Dear Sappers,
I'm configuring Pricing Schema for Project System(PS) module.
The requirement is, the schema will be in such a way that it supports both excise, CST, VAT and service tax.
In PS module the user raises a Purchase Order having procurement of material as well as taking service from Vendor.For this in PO he will maintain both material as well as service.
I'm configuring the Pricing schema in MM - Purchasing - Condition.
My question is for materials procurement, everything is working fine.But for service respect to activity number I want to maintain service tax and other cess in condition record.
But to maintain service tax & other cess for activity number, I want the access sequence of sevice to be in Purchasing.I've taken the standard table for Plant, Vendor, Purchase Organinzation and activity number combination from External Service management and making a new access sequence in MM - Purchasing.All fields are coming but for Activity number, it not taking the document structure and showing error.
How to overcome this??
Any suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Warm Regards
PKB

Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for your suggestions.
As per you reply, the access sequence is already maintain in External Service Management.But I want to bring the same combination Plant, Vendor, Purchase Organizartion and Activity number that is Table 97 to MM - Purchasing - Conditions- Access Sequence.
I've tried to do it, but when I'm creating in MM - Purchasing, all document structure is copying except activity number.What I analyse the error is due to application area.Activity number is MS (External Service Management) area but i'm trying to do in M(Purchasing)
Even though when I enter manually MS for the access sequence system is not taking.
Suggest me.
Warm Regards
PKB
Edited by: Pranaya Barik on Dec 11, 2009 12:09 PM

Pricing schema for Quotation

Hi,
I have copied the standard pricing schema and done changes according to the business requirement. I have done all other required configurations. The new schema is effective for purchase order, but while maintaining quotation still the standard schema's conditions only appearing in quotation.
Please advice
Regards,
Sattuj

Hi,
Check your Gross price condition type in M/06- remove the pricing procedure in it and maintain your new pricing procedure in that field. Or you can define your new supplementary pricing procedure with required conditions and maintain in the base price condition. Then you can able to maintain your other conditions in Quotation or inforecord.
Umakanth R

Statistical indicator in Pricing schema.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for