Status check on MIGO while doing GR from PO

Hi Team,
How to remove/ deactivate status check maintained on MIGO while doing GR from PO
Thanks

Not sure exactly what is causing it but I doubt that this is an SAP problem.
The error message you are getting has only the word TEST in it and the message number starts with a Z. SAP doesn't start their message numbers with Z. It is used for customer objects. This tells me that the message you are seeing is a custom one someone in your company has created and is causing to display. Chances are it is being used in a user exit as part of development. If this is in your production system, I would say you have a problem as a TEST message like that shouldn't show up. It should either be a real message with additional information or it should have been removed before moving to production.
I would have a developer run this in debug. Chances are you'll find a user exit in use that is causing this.
FF

Similar Messages

Delivery Qty for Material is less than P.O. while doing STO from Plant

Dear All,
Please help me in this issue.
While doing STO from one Plant to another Plant, The picked Delivery qty in VL10D is less than P.O. qty for one perticular
Material. What could be the issue and solution from it.
Regards
AJIT K SINGH
Edited by: AJIT K SINGH on Jun 8, 2010 2:01 PM
Edited by: AJIT K SINGH on Jun 8, 2010 2:03 PM

>
AJIT K SINGH wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please help me in this issue.
> While doing STO from one Plant to another Plant, The picked Delivery qty in VL10D is less than P.O. qty for one perticular
> Material. What could be the issue.
>
> Regards
> AJIT K SINGH
Seems like the stock is not available for the particular material, thats why it is picking up the less amount which is available in stock, or the ATP check has blocked the stock available, and you have certain pieces available currently for the said material.

Auto check number pick while doing the F110

HI All,
Mentioned error message shown while doing the F110.
Check number status at beginning of processing:
My object is to pick the cheque numbers automatically ,while making the payments through F110.
System is not consuming the numbers.
Rgds
Mani Kumar

4 Possibilities -
> Check if you have the RFFOUS_C program defined for the payment method in Country settings - FBZP.
> Check if your variant for RFFOUS_C has the right payment method for printing checks.
> Check if yo have any other proposal for same vendor already created but not finished the payment run for that. It might be due to duplication of entries.
> Check your check-lot. Hope its not exhausted.
Please search forums for more.
Regards,
Zubin

Check in migo while gr raw material should equal with the challan materials

hi friends,
while doing gr in migo there should be a check for the raw material's which we are giving should match with challan materials. Here challan no is entered at the excise invoice tab- subcontracting challan level.
points will be rewarded,
thanks in advance ,
prasad.

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

Error while doing settlement from WBS to P&L Account

Hello
I am trying to do a settlement from WBS to P&L Account(Expense account). In this case, "Dummy" Prof Ctr is getting derived from 0KE5 (we have maintained a dummy prof ctr). We have set the validations to disallow any postings/settlements to dummy prof ctr. Hence I am getting an error while doing settlement.
Now I am maintaning a Prof ctr in my WBS master data. I am unable to understand why system is deriving dummy prof ctr and not the one maintained on WBS master data. The settlements are working fine when I do them against Balance sheet accounts and proper prof ctr is getting derived, which is being maintained on WBS master data. I am getting trouble only while doing settlement to my P&lL i.e. expense accounts.
can anyone throw some light on this?
Thks
Sarang

Dear Sarang,
You have maintained profit center in WBS master which is not updated at the time settlement to FI that what makes you worried. If you are making FI posting and give WBS as an additional account assignment then Profit center in WBS master will be updated. Here in settlement WBS is sender not the receiver so that profit center will not be updated. In settlement receiver (any) is debited and sender (WBS) is credited so this credit entry will be updated in profit center.
To your second query that when you carry out settlement to balance sheet account right profit center is updated then please make sure, that balance sheet account is maintained in 3KEH with profit center or OKB9.
Your P&L account (expense) receives dummy profit center because it is not able to find cost center which can fetch profit center from the master. So, if you can afford, maintain that cost elements (expense account) with profit center in OKB9.
might help you..........................................................

After applying Hotfix 2910552,while doing Migration from Win XP to Win 8.1 got Error 800700C1

Hi,
I have two SCCM Lab. Both have same configuration and hotfix(2910552) installed.
I am doing hardlink migration from Windows XP to Windows 8.1.
In one of the lab migration from XP to win 8.1 have successfully implemented after applying the hotfix 2910552,and then after updating the Boot image. But i am getting issue while doing the same on my second lab. The error in log file is
Command line execution failed(0x800700C1)
Failed to install boot image,is not a valid win32 application
Failed to reboot the system(0x800700C1)
Thanks
Pallavi

Thank you for sharing the solution.
If your question was resolved/answered, you should mark the thread as "answered".
Then you should make e new thread/question for the new error you get. This will make it alot easier for other users, modetrators and Microsoft to help you. It will also make it much eaiser for othe people with the same issue to search the forums.
Thank you.
Ronni Pedersen | Microsoft MVP - ConfigMgr | Blogs:
www.ronnipedersen.com/ and www.SCUG.dk/ | Twitter
@ronnipedersen

System status LKD is active while doing ME21N

Hi,
While doing ME21N transaction system showing
"Error: System status LKD is active ( ORD 300303)"
Thanks and Regards
SK

Hi,
First of all ,please make sure if the status lkd is already exist for
the orders in koko4.If that's the case it is necessary to revoke the
status LKD on these orders e.g. with transaction KO02.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Ended with return code: === 8 === while doing transports from Dev to Test

Hi Experts,
We are doing transports from BD1 to BQ1 and getting this error message.
Could anyone please let me know why and what would be the solution for the following error message:
Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
Transport request   : BD1K900065
System              : BQ1
tp path             : tp
Version and release: 370.00.09 700
Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
End date and time : 20070803133308
Ended with return code: ===> 8 <===
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Chandu.

Raymonds,
There is huge list of errors coming up. Some of them are as below:
Navigation attribute 0SALESORG is missing in characteristic 0PLANT
Navigation attribute 0SALES_DIST is missing in characteristic 0PLANT
Characteristic 0RT_LOCATIO: Referenced characteristic 0PLANT not (actively) available
Attribute 0INT_CUST from characteristic 0SALESORG not (actively) available
Attribute 0CRM_MKTELM from characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Attribute 0CRM_MKTELM from characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Hierarchy characteristic 0BPARTNER of characteristic 0UCCONTRACT is not active
Characteristic 0UCOUTLCONT: Referenced characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Characteristic 0UCOUTLCONT: Referenced characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Chandu.

Error While doing PGI from VL02n

Hello all,
Iam doing PGI from VL02n transaction and getting the following error :
E M7 055
"G/L account 500001 does not exist in company code RB02."
Please explain why is it going after G/L account 500001.
Thanks & Regards,

Hi,
I think the cost centre has not been configured for the material.It is a functional issue so ask your functional consultant to configure it.
Thanks,
Sandeep.

Error while doing PGI from VL02n Transaction.

Hi..
I am doing PGI from VL02n transaction and getting the following error. "Plant conversion Failed".
Any idea what might be wrong.
Thanks and apprecite ur help.

PGI is the simplest BDC you can ever write. If you are getting this error, there must be something wrong with the data. Try doing the transaction call online in debug mode and see where the error comes from. You can then identify what needs to be done.

System status INCM is active while doing the confirmation from SRM

Hi,
User is getting the below error while trying to create confirmation in SRM for some of the PO's.
Partner XXX not found
System status INCM is active (Confirmation XXXX)
Partner not found XXX (Item 1)
The version is SRM 4.0 (Classic scenario). We have already checked the user profile and it is consistent in the system. The BP record for this user in table BUT000 is all fine. User is able to create the confirmation for other PO's. Also we have checked the G/L account for any posting period issue. Everything is fine. The error is coming while user is trying to do the confirmation for some of the PO's.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Warm regards,
Aswini

The error is coming while user is trying to do the confirmation for some of the PO's.
Check these POs to see if any of the partners are invalid. You could do this through "process purchase order" transaction. Sometimes this error occurs when one or several of the PO partners no longer exist, e.g. left the company, etc.

Error while doing commint from RFC Adapter

Hi,
We have a SOAP-PI-RFC synchronous scenario. Through this Soap request comes to PI and passed on to BAPI via RFC adapter. This BAPI saves the transaction & return the document number. We are using " PI PI parameter u201CCommit Handling for single BAPI' in RFC receiver Channel.
While this setup works for 1 posting, when we do the mass load ( Say 20 Documents) half of the documents are not able to Save. Although BAPI, returns the document number but on checking the document does not exists in SAP. To do further test, we created a program in ECC and try calling BAPI in loop and calling BAPI Commit.
This way program works fine and there is no error
So in nutshell, when we PI do the commit, half of the documents are not saving where as when the ABAP program commits no error. Is there any special way that PI calls this commit work.
PS: We created a wrapper BAPI which calls the orgirnal BAPI and Commit BAPI & called this from PI but still the same problem is coming.
Appreciate help on this.
Regards,
Harish

Are there any error messages in the RFC Reciever channel in Runtime Workbench?
RWB -> Component monitoing -> Adapter Engine -> Comm Channel -> filter for type RFC
Please try to give some more details on why the system says the messages are failing.

Return Delivery Error in MIGO while doing Movement type 122

Hi All,
I am doing MIGO Return Delivery to Vendor. I am getting the following Error. Pls help its urgent issue.
I have checked the stock level. The stock is sufficient for doing return delivery.
"Deficit of BA Unrestricted-use 1,575 MT : 20461615 2100 2131 MARCH2012"
Thanks IN Advance,
GANESH
Edited by: ganesh_pall on Sep 19, 2011 10:43 AM

HI,
Can you tell me the stocks are available in unrestricted use or any other use like blocked (or) quality inspection . check it once.
if the stocks are available in quality inspection first transfer the stock from quality inspection to unrestricted through t.code qa32
Then try to do the return to the vendor through migo
Edited by: A.Purihella on Sep 19, 2011 10:55 AM

Error in MIGO while doing Intracompnay plant to depot by STO

Dear gurus,
I am facing an error while posting MIGO during intra-company plant to plant STO.
Settings for STO:
SPRO >IMG > MM >Purchasing > Purchase Order>set up Stock Transport Order
Define Shipping Data
Define/assign Checking rule
Assign Delivery Type
Assign Doc type
I have maintained the following pre-requisite master data
1. Supplying/Receiving plants are created as customer/vendor master
2. Excise details (customer/Vendor/Plant) data are maintained in J1ID
3. Assessable value is entered in J1ID
Process flow:
1. ME21n - Create STO (PO type:UB)
2. VL10B - Create Outbound Delivery
3. VL02N - PGI
4. VF01 - Create Pro-forma Invoice (Stock Transfer Invoice)
5. J1IIN - Post Excise Invoice
at the receiving Plant
6. MIGO-Post Goods Receipt.
After entering the excise invoice and clicking on CHECK button in MIGO, the following errors are appearing
1. Excise Details are not maintained for Vendor .-Message no. 8I565
2. Maintain Vendor for the excise invoice -Message no. 4F185
3. Please check excise base for the item is zero ! -Message no. 4F121
Please reply your valuable suggestions.
Regards,
Anbu

Dear,
1. Excise Details are not maintained for Vendor .-Message no. 8I565
   Kindly maintain Excise Indicator for Vendor in TCODE-J1ID
2. Maintain Vendor for the excise invoice -Message no. 4F185
     Kindly maintain Excise Indicator for VENDOR in J1ID
3. Please check excise base for the item is zero ! -Message no. 4F121
     As excise in calculated on Base amount for Item so need to maintain Pricing for item then only it will be able to calculate
or if u dont want to item not to be relevent for pricing then make Excise condition type as manual an maintain it manually .
Regards
AJIT K SINGH
HAPPY TO HELP U

I am getting an error while doing Remove From Client action in inactive dc'

Hi,
I am getting an error while i am unlocking the DC from my system.
i selected option remove from client from context menu of DC in inactive dc's
then a popup came asking delete contents or donot delete contents.
i select donot delete contents.....
now i ts throwing an error ...as shown below
Some files have been edited/changed.
Look over your open activities.
com.sap.tc.devconf.SyncException: Cannot unsync component. There are files checked out.
     at com.sap.tc.devconf.impl.DCProxy.doUnsyncSources(DCProxy.java:4187)
     at com.sap.tc.devconf.impl.DCProxy.unsync(DCProxy.java:1322)
     at com.sap.tc.devconf.impl.DevelopmentConfiguration.unsync(DevelopmentConfiguration.java:4897)
     at com.sap.tc.devconf.impl.DevelopmentConfiguration.unsync(DevelopmentConfiguration.java:5045)
     at com.sap.ide.eclipse.component.provider.actions.dc.DCUnsyncAction$1.execute(DCUnsyncAction.java:127)
     at org.eclipse.ui.actions.WorkspaceModifyOperation$1.run(WorkspaceModifyOperation.java:71)
     at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1595)
     at org.eclipse.ui.actions.WorkspaceModifyOperation.run(WorkspaceModifyOperation.java:85)
     at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.runInCurrentThread(ModalContext.java:302)
     at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:252)
     at org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.ProgressMonitorDialog.run(ProgressMonitorDialog.java:357)
     at com.sap.ide.eclipse.component.provider.actions.dc.DCUnsyncAction.run(DCUnsyncAction.java:212)
     at com.tssap.selena.model.extension.action.SelenaActionCollector$GenericElementActionWrapper.run(SelenaActionCollector.java:229)
     at com.tssap.util.ui.menu.MenuFactory$MuSiAction.saveRunAction(MenuFactory.java:1425)
     at com.tssap.util.ui.menu.MenuFactory$MuSiAction.run(MenuFactory.java:1391)
     at com.tssap.util.ui.menu.MenuFactory$DelegateAction.processInternal(MenuFactory.java:616)
     at com.tssap.util.ui.menu.MenuFactory$DelegateAction.access$100(MenuFactory.java:586)
     at com.tssap.util.ui.menu.MenuFactory$DelegateAction$BusyProcessWorker.run(MenuFactory.java:716)
     at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:69)
     at com.tssap.util.ui.menu.MenuFactory$DelegateAction.process(MenuFactory.java:610)
     at com.tssap.util.ui.menu.internal.MenuListenerFactory$ProcessAdapter.widgetSelected(MenuListenerFactory.java:172)
     at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TypedListener.handleEvent(TypedListener.java:89)
     at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:81)
     at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:840)
     at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:2022)
     at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:1729)
     at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:1402)
     at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.run(Workbench.java:1385)
     at com.tssap.util.startup.WBLauncher.run(WBLauncher.java:79)
     at org.eclipse.core.internal.boot.InternalBootLoader.run(InternalBootLoader.java:858)
     at org.eclipse.core.boot.BootLoader.run(BootLoader.java:461)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
     at com.sap.ide.eclipse.startup.Main.basicRun(Main.java:291)
     at com.sap.ide.eclipse.startup.Main.run(Main.java:789)
     at com.sap.ide.eclipse.startup.Main.main(Main.java:607)
Regards,
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh,
er, what kind of answer do you expect here?
"Some files have been edited/changed.
Look over your open activities.
com.sap.tc.devconf.SyncException: Cannot unsync component. There are files checked out."
Do you have file checked out? If yes, you should probably check in your changes or revert them and remove the configuration afterwards.
If you don't have files checked out maybe there are some files that were made writable without DTRs knowledge.
Regards,
Marc

Status check on MIGO while doing GR from PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for