Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 005/2009

Dear friends,
User is getting this error, when they do the Settlement in KO88.
They are revoking some Process Order status from TECO to DLV after the settlement becasue of some adjustments are pending for that process orders.
I suggested that Reverse the settlement and do the necessary adjustments and rerun the settlement as per the business process.
But in this current period, they changed the Process order status from DLV to TECO. So that they are not getting above error.
Now they are asking why we need to reverse the settlement and do rerun the settlement.
So how to convince the user in this regards.
Please sugget me.
Raju

Hi Raju,
When in previous period user had done TECO and Settlement for a particular Process Order, system might have already posted the Variances on that Order in that Period.
Think of this situtaion...If the user did TECO by mistake for an Order which was in CNF stage during last period, system had posted variances during that period. Ideally, if there is no GR against that Process Order, the Cost loaded onto that Order till the last date of previous period should go to WIP of that Period. But, because, by mistake User did TECO and Settled, system had posted Variances.
Now, during the current period, if the User simply revers the TECO and posts some costs, does TECO again and Settle, system will not object but what about the "treatment of costs" system has done during last month...? Instead of treating the cost (at the time of Settlement during last month) as WIP and showing it in Balance Sheet as Current Asset (System calculates and posts WIP for Order with neither TECO nor DLV statuses), system had posted Variances to Price Difference Account (P&L Debit) as well as to COPA.
If you want to "reverse" the "effect that has taken place during the last month's Settlement", you must reverse the Settlement (of last month), TECO in the current month and post the costs to the Order.
Still, if there is no GR happened till the end of the current month, the Order will not be of status DLV/TECO. So, when User tries to Settle the Order in the current period, WIP will be posted by the system. If the User changes the status of the Order to TECO in the current month, obviously system will calculate Variances.
It's all at the discretion of the User whether to reverse the previous settlement. You need to explain the User clearly the "treatment of costs" done by the system during last month so that they can take wise decision...
Revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Similar Messages

Service entry Sheet was reversed after the invoice as posted and rebooked

Hi..
Service entry sheet was reversed after the invoice as posted and rebooked with final entry marked. The rebook transaction created a different $ amount than the original SES. The difference between the 2 amounts is causing a GRIR out of balance on the PO. MR11 does not indicate a GRIR out of balance.
why did SES rebook a different value?
How can we clean up the GRIR out of balance?
Please help...
Mercy

This is a standard SAP procedure.
SAP Note 440942 is helpful to sort this out.
Thanks,
Mercy

MTO; change system status of sales order lines after settlement to "Closed"

HI
Is there a program (or transactin), to do mass change of system status for MTO sales order lines to "Closed" ?
Thank you, Dejan

Try using transaction "MASS" and object type "BUS2032".
Shail

CO88:Error message KD 285-GR reversed 5 months after settlement

Hi Friends,
We have a production order on which GR is reversed after 5 months of final settlement was done. The order status is now changed from 'Closed' to 'Released'. The Order has now costs posted to it which should be posted as WIP as the goods receipt earlier done has been now reversed. The system does calculate WIP but at the time of settlement gives the error message KD 285-Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 003 2009. This error message recommends revesring the past settlement. When you try to reverse settlement, it is not possible due to error message CK122 (as the MM period for the past settlement is closed and this period is 5 months earlier than the current period.) Is there any way to be able to reverse settlement in the past periods (not immediately previous period)? If not, is there any workaround to fix this issue? If the status is set to TECO again, the system may post all costs posted to the order as variance instead of WIP so that does not seem to be solution. The GR is not going to be posted in current month again so for one month correct result, is there any way which can be used?
Thanks and regards,
Pinky

Hi Pinky,
I think You have done a simple mistake,
Before Reversing the Order, i think u did not revers Settlement...RIGHT...?
U should have reversed the settlement, and reversed GR...
Now the solution is, Post the Reversed GR again , first check in current period, IF not I think u have to change the period to 003,
Reverse the settlement in the last period 003, Again reverse The GR.
Now it will be ready for WIP calculation.
Check it in SANDBOX.
Correct me if i m Wrong..
Regards,
PAVANIDLUR,
SAP PP

Customizing for WIP calculation: maintain status DLV and TECO

Hi Team,
I m a getting the above error while doing the WIP Calaculation .
I am going to the transaction OKGC for maitaining the new valutions methods for controlling area there . system is not allowing to enter the new value.
Could you plaese help me out how to maitaint the new values in OKGC transaction.Let me know is there any prerequsite for mataintain new values.
Regards
sailendra
Edited by: sailendra mulagada on Jun 26, 2009 2:39 PM

Hi,
System will allow you enter the new WIP Valuation method in OKGC
First system will ask whether the WIP Valuation is based on Actual costs or Target cost.
Select as per your requirement default will be Actual costs , then enter the RA Key .
System will copy all the Status DLV, TECO, REL, PREL for that Controlling area & RA Key.
rgds
gsc

"Execute amount settlement up to and including settlement period 011 2009 "

Hi,
My user got error: " Execute amount settlement up to and including settlement period 011 2009 first" when try run settlement via CJ88.
It was noted user did not run the settlemt for the WBS since period 12 2007 but now wants to settle it period 12 2009.
User do not wish to run for all the past period, please advise a solution to settle the WBS.
Thank you.

Hi,
The user can't do that since all the past periods are closed.
Anything can be done to rectify the matter in current period.
Thank you.

Order status after settlement

hi friends,
What status does the system set for those orders for which the settlement is done.
I what to take a list of orders for which settlement is done for the month.
regards
csn.

Hello,
After Settlement System will not put the Status: NAKL ( Final Costing).
Because the production order can continue to be charged with costs even after order settlement, the status "Final costing" would merely indicate that the order has been settled at least once. The status cannot indicate that the order no longer has a BALANCE. Therefore, the system would have to reset the status again for every actual posting to the order. However, this procedure is not currently supported.
Hence after settlement there will not be any status specific to settlement.
Regards,
Siva

FTR_TRD 022 Error message when I try to settle SWAP transaction which was reversed previously

Hello Gurus!
I've got a problem with settlement of SWAP transaction.
The situation:
1) I created Cross-curr.interest Swap transaction. Product type is the copy of "62B Cross-curr.int.rate swap (CCS) SWAP"
2) Made 'Settle' for it.
3) Made 'Reverse' for it.
4) After that I try to re 'Settle' transaction. Error message appears for the flow 1125
Unable to determine the TRD business transaction for flow 1125 31.08.2014 + 35.000,00
Message no. FTR_TRD022
The same message error appears on 'Change' of this transaction.
I don't have such problems with other OTC transactions.
What should I do with it. I thought that it is SAP program error but I didn't find any suitable Notes.

Hello Jyoti,
thank you for reply!
I've got processing category for my transaction category = '00002 With Settlement'.
So then I reverse the transaction activity is changed from '2 Contract Settlement' to '1 Contract'
What do you mean 'setting for activity reverse to settle. Generally we define activty 10 to 20' ??
Where can I customize ??

Variance in Production Order after settlement

Hi All,
We have few production orders in whihc has been settled, but now after settlement also there is a balance left in those production order.
The Status of these production orders is DLV. I have reversed its previous settlement now again tried to settled the Order. Aftter settlement it is taking the entry for WIP account and it is not effecting our Prod Var account.
Please help how to settle the order and any clue why system is still showing the balance.
Thanks!!!
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava

Hi Vivek
I think you are in Prod Cost By Period scenario i.e. Settlement Type in your Settlement rule is PER and not FUL
In the case of Product Cost By Period - Variance calculation is not dependant on Order Status
Since you are saying you have DLV status and yet going to WIP - This means you are in PER scenario
Your order will show the balance till the time you settle for all the periods in which the values have been posted to the prod Order
Press (CTRLSHIFTF11) to see the values posted in each period.. I think values have been posted in the next periods also and you have not executed settlement for those periods
Br, Ajay M
Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Feb 27, 2011 2:01 PM

WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV

Dear experts,
Is there any way to change WIP calculation method for Prod.order status ?
In t-code OKGC:: By default system will set:
Order status      Status number         RA type
REL                          2                             WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
DLV                          3                            Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
PREL                  1                            WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
TECO                  4                            Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
I can not change any thing in t-code OKGC (gray after insert: CO, RA version, RA key).
As I understanding: Prod.order with status DLV will not be considered to calculate WIP.
But I want to calculate WIP for Prod.order with status DLV. Could you pls guide me how to configure the system?
Thank you!

Hi,
I suppose it is positive variance as the yield from the order is 10 pieces more than the planned quantity of 1000 and it is always a variance and no WIP involved in this case. It can be settled to FI/PCA and to CO-PA by variance categories (if you have configured accordingly)
Therefore the accounting entry would be:
1. Delivery to stock of 10 pieces:
FG Debit
Change in Stock Credit
2. Variances will post the difference:
Change in Stock Debit
Price Difference is Credit
Concerning the valuation method it needs to be tested before it can be implemented.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

Reversal of settlement from Asset to WBS

Hi Experts,
I have a question regarding reversal of settlement from AUC to asset.
I have so many line items on a WBS element, which i settled to AUC. I can see all the line items that are capitalized to AUC in CJIC screen, where i create settlement rules to settle to asset.
I have created one settlement rule for 4 line items and settled to an Asset 1. After that I have created another settlment rule for another 5 line items to settle to an asset 2 and run the settlement in CJ88 using partial capitalization, since I have some more lines left in the CJIC.
Now, when I am trying to reverse the settlement on WBS system is reversing whatever settled on asset 2 to back to AUC. I want to reverse the line items settled on Asset 1. Is it possible? If so, how can i do that? I can see all the settlements on the WBS in CJID. But, how can i reverse any settlement that is 3 to 4 months older. We are doing 4 to 5 settlements in a month
Thanks,
Satya

reversal transaction will reverse what was transacted
so you need to reverse for both asset 1 and 2 and then edefine the settlement as required after correction and then settle again

Actual costs after settlement

Logically should actual costs be displayed in cost reports after settlement?
In my case line item actuals shows the costs as zero as PRE settlement done to cost center. But in that case should the value be still displayed as actual costs.
In other systems here the value is still displayed though it is settled to an AuC or CTR. What could be the reason?

You may reverse the manual posting to asset (credit posting with Dr/Cr indicator of C) and then perform settlement via CJ88. I hope i was able to understand your query correctly and answer it appropriately.
Regards,
Syed Ammar Zaheer

System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear

Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
Is there another way of preventing the Goods Receipts to be reversed after invoices have been posted and cleared?
Thanks,

System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear
Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
I also checked the "GR based IV" in the PO item details, inoive tab and that is not checked.
Invoice have been posted and cleared and now the GRs are reversing them, how to prevent this from happening. Is there a config. solution???
Thanks,

Will Project Budget be available again after settlement to AUC/final asset?

I would like to know if my project budget will become available again once I settle costs to AUC and to Final asset (or settle directly to final asset w/o AUC).
Letu2019s say my original budget for WBS is 5000, cost was posted to the WBS u2013 4000, now I settle the 4000 cost to AUC (and eventually from AUC to final asset). Will this mean the entire 5000 will be available again since the cost has been settled from WBS to AUC (and eventually fixed asset)?
Thanks!
Vivian

If you have Budgeted WBS element and than after you does any cost postings against that WBS. you budget get consumed by that actual cost.
however, WBS element is capturing cost for the period of project duration that cost has to transfer to FI/ CO , finally so, at the period-end we does the settlement & transfer taht cost to cost center , PA , asset etc....
So, no point that after settlement your budget will be your initial budget.
Regards
Nitin

Reverse asset settlement

Hi Consultants
i am struggling asset settlement reversal. I have settled asset AUC to another AUC with different asset classes. Now i want to reverse asset settlement reversal. While I am going AB08 and when I select my transaction it leads to be AIST screen and after execution it leads to another window where all the transaction of assets are there except the one which I want to reverse also reversal documents are not generating. The document i want to reverse is with ATT 346.
Thanks in advance.

Hello Master,
First make sure T-code -AIST is active on your system and you have the authorization
Then also check this link
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3296011
Settle all cost of those WBS elements to one fix asset using CJIC.
Reverse all AUC postings, transfer all cost to single WBS using KB11N & then settle to one AUC.
Good luck
Sam

Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 005/2009

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for