Stereo or Mono? Which? And why?

Once again I'm starting a new thread to explain some general audio principles that newbies have trouble with.
There's an issue here that's a bit difficult to explain--the difference between "stereo" and "mono".
You have two ears, so you hear "stereo". Your ears send a left signal and right signal to your brain. Your brain processes the difference between the two signals and gives you a sense of direction. You can figure out where the sound you are hearing is coming from.
Originally, recording technology only permitted mono recording. One microphone, and one speaker to play it back. When you listen to recordings made before about 1962, you are listening to a mono recording. If you have a modern stereo and you are playing back a recording from before 1962, you are getting signals out of your left and right speaker, but the signals are identical. You are just getting mono out of two speakers.
Originally "stereo" meant placing two microphones on something--one to represent what the left ear would hear, and one to represent what the right ear would hear.
However, when you take one microphone and plug it into a recording device, you can only record a mono track. Your recording device might permit you to record what you think is stereo, but in reality you are only recording two identical mono tracks.
A guitar also has a plug that comes out of it that sends a mono signal.
Nowadays we create fake stereo inside the recording device by means of what we call a digital reverb or digital delay. This device takes a mono input (such as from a single microphone or from a single guitar cord) and simulates the sound as if it were playing in a much larger room, with positional information included--placing something in a simulated position in the stereo field and creating a simulated left stereo channel and a simulated right stereo channel.
So if you record one input, and put no effects on it, you get mono. If you run it through a stereo reverb or a stereo delay, you get simulated stereo.
If you put an acoustic guitar in a large, reverberant room, and set up two microphones, one on the left side of the room and one on the right side of the room, and record the two mono mike signals to a stereo track on your digital recorder, then you get real live stereo.
When you play a software instrument in GarageBand, it records it as a stereo signal. What you are usually getting is in fact a monophonic sample that is processed through a stereo reverb, simulating stereo. In some cases, it may actually be a digitally sampled musical instrument that was sampled in stereo, with two microphones, like the example of the guitar in the reverberant room that I mentioned above. Software instruments of drum kits and acoustic pianos are examples of instruments that are usually sampled as real or artificial stereo to begin with.
Beginners think "stereo" is the right way to record, and "mono" is not. But this has nothing to do with the right way to record, and has nothing to do with wheter it's a high quality recording. If you are recording through only one microphone, or only one guitar cord, this is mono, and that's right.

Good points, Wheat. And when you record from several sources, and combine them and mix them, panning things to "set the stage" you get a stereo mix, of mono recordings. SI, the final result is stereo, not necessarily each individual piece of the recording. Of course, a drum kit can be recorded in stereo, as well as some keyboards that are actually stereo. But most things you hear on CDs are a compilation of mono tracks, panned to create the stereo image you hear.

Similar Messages

  • On RTS-CTS & DTR-DSR pairs, which and why?

    Hello All
    Is there somewhere in the Net a good article about when and why to use the flow control RTS-CTS and/or DTR-DSR.
    I am dealing with duplex communication between two devices via RS232 and I would like to know when and why to control those lines.
    I also found three types of Null-Modem cables and all it is connected with the control of those lines.
    Where I can read about it?
    Thanks in advance
    Pawel

    Most RS-232 communication is full duplex, meaning you can transmit and receive at the same time. RS-232 UARTs have separate transmit and receive machines and FIFOs. The processing speed and large available memory of today's electronics (PCs as well as other devices) drastically reduce the need for hardware handshaking. I've been writing RS-232 applications for almost 20 years. I haven't used hardware handshaking for over 15 years, and that application only required it because one piece of equipment was already 30 years old.
    Hardware handshaking adds complexity to the software as well as the hardware. If you're only going a short distance, off the shelf cables include all RS-232 lines. But for longer runs, it will be easier and cheaper to run 3 or 4 conductor cabl
    e without hardware handshaking.
    If you need handshaking, consider software handshaking if your devices support XON/XOFF handshaking.
    If you do a Google search for RS-232 handshaking, you'll find plenty of links. Some of these will give you an introduction.
    http://www.airborn.com.au/rs232.html
    http://www.bb-europe.com/tech_articles/faq_rs232_connections_work.asp
    http://www.qkon.com/uploads/27_Practical%20RS232%20Design%20Considerations.pdf

  • OT: 3D Apps on Mac - Which and Why?

    Hi All,
    I'm beginning to explore some 3D design and would appreciate your advice and insights. I am a graphic designer - traditionally working 2D print. However, my longer term goals are to get into product/industrial design (hand held size objects like perfume bottles, packaging, housewares and perhaps small furniture).
    As well, I currently work in an architecture firm where I am beginning to work on signage projects. My goal with working in 3D is to be able to:
    1. Draft the design in 2D and create usable spec drawings to be passed to a fabricator, and
    2. Create a 3D mock-up of the signage in a virtual environment to share the idea with the client.
    Unfortunately, at work I am on a PeeCee. I'm aware of Autodesk's 3Ds Max and VIZ, but do not want to purchase a PeeCee for these at home. We do have a few licenses for 3Ds and VIZ at work, but I'd much rather maintain my Mac-based home and freelance life for the long term, as one day I may move on to other opportunities and don't want to have switched to the PeeCee for what little 3D work I'll do at my current position. I'm confident that there are many successful Mac-based industrial designers out there and hope that one might chime in and share their experience here.
    What are the common 3D apps for today's Mac-based industrial designers?
    Here are a few I've briefly looked into:
    Autodesk: Maya
    Maxon: Cinema 4D
    Newtek: Lightwave
    Ashlar-Vellum: Graphite w/ Cobalt/Xenon
    Cheetah 3D
    Google: SketchUp (Pro)
    I have begun working with SketchUp (very minorly) and am starting some tutorials with Maya 8.5 PLE. I've also downloaded a trial version of Cheetah.
    My main question here is, which app(s) would you recommend to someone who is a beginner in 3D and is looking to work in product design in the future, yet be able to utilize 3D skills in architectural signage & graphics in generating competent spec sheets for fabrication and client 'wow-ing'?
    Thanks for reading my rather lengthy post and taking the time to respond - I truly appreciate it.
    Best,
    Michael
    P.S. - I am planning a significant machine upgrade in the near future to an 8-core system to start working more seriously with 3D.

    I've been doing 3D for about 9 years. Started with Strata Pro 3D have owned many others including Bryce, Carrara, Poser, RED, Lightwave. have tried about everything in one form or another. What I've learned is there are only 3 that really count for the regular guy. Lightwave, 3D max & Maya. I went with Lightwave. You get a full set of tools & the render engine beats everything else out of the box hands down! It is extremely stable. Still waiting for the Universal version which will be deal breaker if Newtek craps out on it, I don't think that will happen considering the number of posts I've seen reguarding the Universal beta version. All 3 programs take a considerable amount of dedication-you've just left the safe space of graphic design and entered the world of 3D. What I mean is 3D takes all your skills and puts them back at beginner level. If you don't have a real love for problem solving, computers & art you might as well not spend the money. It's the difference between buying a cello for your home or weekend orchestra concert and making a living playing a cello or piano, you get the point. Sorry, went off there. I like Lightwave for what I do, the price for all the features I get, stability, amount of free/pay available training, and it's a standard in the industry. Hope that helps.
    Sleeeper

  • I'm deaf in one ear and need a stereo-to-mono earbud so I can use my iPod and iPhone. It is not good being able to hear only one channel. Can Apple consider making such a thing for those of use who need such a thing?

    I'm deaf in one ear and need a stereo-to-mono earbud so I can use my iPod and iPhone. It is not good being able to hear only one channel. Can Apple consider making such a thing for those of use who need such a thing?

    bassvid wrote:
    Thanks...now I need to do something about the iPod.
    I'm not sure which version iPod you have, but I just checked my iPod nano (current generation) and it also has a Mono Audio setting in Settings>General>Accessibility.

  • Which Mac Pro? More cores=slower speeds? And most of us know the speed matters or FPU for music and I don't understand the faster is for the least amount of procs. And while I get the whole rendering thing and why it makes sense.

    Which Mac Pro? More cores=slower speeds? And most of us know the speed matters or FPU for music and I don't understand the faster is for the least amount of procs. And while I get the whole rendering thing and why it makes sense.
    The above is what the bar says. It's been a while and wondered, maybe Apple changed the format for forums. Then got this nice big blank canvas to air my concerns. Went to school for Computer Science, BSEE, even worked at Analog Devices in Newton Massachusetts, where they make something for apple. 
    The bottom line is fast CPU = more FPU = more headroom and still can't figure out why the more cores= the slower it gets unless it's to get us in to a 6 core then come out with faster cores down the road or a newer Mac that uses the GPU. Also. Few. I'm the guy who said a few years ago Mac has an FCP that looks like iMovie on Steroids. Having said that I called the campus one day to ask them something and while I used to work for Apple, I think she thought I still did as she asked me, "HOW ARE THE 32 CORES/1DYE COMING ALONG? Not wanting to embarrass her I said fine, fine and then hung up.  Makes the most sense as I never quite got the 2,6,12 cores when for years everything from memory to CPU's have been, in sets of 2 to the 2nd power.  2,4,8,16,32,64,120,256,512, 1024, 2048,4196,8192, 72,768.  Wow. W-O-W and will be using whatever I get with Apollo Quad. 
    Peace to all and hope someone can point us in THE RIGHT DIRECTION.  THANK YOU

    Thanks for your reply via email/msg. He wrote:
    If you are interested in the actual design data for the Xeon processor, go to the Intel site and the actual CPU part numbers are:
    Xeon 4 core - E5.1620v2
    Xeon 6 core - E5.1650v2
    Xeon 8 core - E5.1680v2
    Xeon 12 core - E5.2697v2
    I read that the CPU is easy to swap out but am sure something goes wrong at a certain point - even if solderedon they make material to absorb the solder, making your work area VERY clean.
    My Question now is this, get an 8 core, then replace with 2 3.7 QUAD CHIPS, what would happen?
    I also noticed that the 8 core Mac Pro is 3.0 when in fact they do have a 3.4 8 core chip, so 2 =16? Or if correct, wouldn't you be able to replace a QUAD CHIP WITH THAT?  I;M SURE THEY ARE UO TO SOMETHING AS 1) WE HAVE SEEN NO AUDIO FPU OR PERHAPS I SHOULD CHECK OUT PC MAKERS WINDOWS machines for Sisoft Sandra "B-E-N-C-H-M-A-R-K-S" -
    SOMETHINGS UP AND AM SURE WE'LL ALL BE PLEASED, AS the mac pro      was announced Last year, barely made the December mark, then pushed to January, then February and now April.
    Would rather wait and have it done correct than released to early only to have it benchmarked in audio and found to be slower in a few areas- - - the logical part of my brain is wondering what else I would have to swap out as I am sure it would run, and fine for a while, then, poof....
    PEACE===AM SURE APPLE WILL BLOW US AWAY - they have to figure out how to increase the power for 150 watts or make the GPU work which in regard to FPU, I thought was NVIDIA?

  • I am going to buy a macbook pro for grade 12, and I need to know wheather I should get a macbook pro or a macbook pro retina. If someone could tell me (in a very simple way) which one is,better for me and why, I would be ever so apprreciative.

    I am going to buy a macbook pro for grade 12, and I need to know wheather I should get a macbook pro or a macbook pro retina. If someone could tell me (in a very simple way) which one is,better for me and why, I would be ever so apprreciative.

    Why do you need a expensive MacBook Pro?
    Your attending high school and unless everyone else is rich also your likely going to be a target by the more poorer students for theft or damage to the machine.
    You could keep it home, but if you need it for class then your exposed again.
    Also at that age your not very careful yet, a MacBook Pro is a expensive and easily damaged machine.
    Unless your made of money and so are others at your school, I would recommned a low profile, just does the job cheap Windows PC.
    If it dies, gets lost, stolen or damaged because of your inexperince handling senstivie electronics then it's no big deal.
    You can buy a Mac later on when your sure you have a need for it, currently there isn't much advantage of owning a Mac compared to a PC, they do just about the same things now, one just looks prettier than the other.
    Since 95% of the world uses Windows PC's your going to have to install Windows on the Mac in order to keep your skills up there or be unemployed, so it's a extra headache and expense.
    good luck

  • Linux on Primary Or Logical? which is better?? and why?

    hello,
    what is the best way to install linux ( redhat,oracle enterprise ,etc)
    on primary partition or logical partition ? and why?
    i have 3 hd's ( hda,hdb,hdc) >> ( 40 GB,80GB,320GB) IDE
    why im asking this becoz i installed linux more than 3 times lately and i always ended up with GRUB errors and problems
    any idea plz shed some light on this
    need your experience regarding the optimal solution to install linux along with Windows OS
    thanks and regards,

    Hi,
    Q: what is the best way to install Linux ( redhat,oracle enterprise ,etc)
    A: Almost no difference between Redhat and Oracle Enterprise Linux. But Oracle has patched some additional patches for Oracle database based on Redhat released Enterprise Linux. If you would have subscribed Oracle Unbreakable Linux Network(ULN), which make it easier to update the system and deploy Oracle database. For more details refer to http://linux.oracle.com
    Q: On primary partition or logical partition ? and why?
    A: Your boot partition ought to be a primary partition, not a logical partition. So if you want to boot your operating system from the drive you are about to partition, it should be installed on primary partition. Otherwise, you can install it on logical partition.
    Q: why im asking this becoz i installed linux more than 3 times lately and i always ended up with GRUB errors and problems
    A: For this issue, what kind of GRUB error had you experienced? What the result after re-installing the grub?
    Happy new year!
    Terry

  • I cannot use a website I need to use, with Firefox 5.0. So, I need to uninstall and go back to 3.5 or 3.6. Please advise. Also, my control panel locks up since Windows Explorer has pbms. Which is why I am using Firefox instead. Thanks for any help!

    I cannot use a website I need to use, with Firefox 5.0. So, I need to uninstall and go back to 3.5 or 3.6. Please advise. Also, my control panel locks up since Windows Explorer has pbms. Which is why I am using Firefox instead. Thanks for any help!

    ''I figured it was going to be FAFSA causing your problem.''
    Install Portable Firefox 3.6.x to your hard drive for that one website. It won't affect your current Firefox installation at all. <br />
    http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable/localization#legacy36

  • Which is better and why: Safari or Firefox?

    Which is better and why: Safari or Firefox?

    Thx, I've been using FF on my MacBook, as I did with PowerMacs before that. I used to work in the industry and stay up on current trends; but, I'm just a regular user with a new MacAir now and hate to bother my SF/SJ peeps with trivial questions.
    As I start to load up the Air, I'm just a bit overwhelmed with the volume of bookmarks I've collected and organzied in FF on my MB.

  • DECODE OR CASE - Which is better and why

    Oracle version: 11.2
    Problem: We have a huge table with 10M records, which needs to be processed daily.
    While loading data in table we have to handle condition if flag is =1 then '111' else '000'
    To implement this which one is efficient solution? .. using CASE or DECODE and why?
    Example:
    SQL> select flag,case when flag='Y' then '111' else '000' end from (select 'Y' as flag from dual union all select 'N' from dual);
    F CAS
    Y 111
    N 000
    SQL> select flag,decode(flag,'Y','111','000') from (select 'Y' as flag from dual union all select 'N' from dual);
    F DEC
    Y 111
    N 000

    Hi,
    For this job, they're equally efficient.
    For any job, where DECODE doesn't require a lot more code than CASE, they will be equally efficient.
    I recommend (almost) always using CASE. It's easier to understand and debug, and, if written correctly, will never be slower than DECODE.
    The only situation where I use DECODE is for very simple tasks (like the one you posted) where this is used inside a very complicated expression, and the slightly less coding needed for DECODE makes the larger statement easier to read.

  • In BDC, I Have 10,000 Records Which Method do I Select? and Why?

    Hi all,
    In BDC , I Have 10,000 Records of Material Master Application. I have go through by Session Method or Call Transaction Method. Which Method do I Select? and Why?

    Hi..
    There you hav to go for sessions method....
    because...
    1. session methos has auto matic error handling option. so if there is any error in last but 100 th reocrd it will just threws that record and remaining part willl complete.
    2. And it was offline method.. means formatting of the data and assigning to Sap lay can be done in two steps... So you  10000 recors can update in expected time comaper with Calltransaction method...
    Get back to me if you are not satisfy with above reasons.
    Thanks,
    Naveen.I

  • MIDI CONTROLLERS WHICH ONE WOULD YOU CHOSE AND WHY?

    Between M-Audio 8v2 , M-Audio 02 , M-AUDIO 49E and M-Audio axiom 25. Which one of these would you choose and why?

    The Axiom 25.
    For the rotary encoders, pads and memory.
    I'd take this over the 49 because both of the keyboards will be pitiful and your better of getting a full size board with hammer action if its about the "piano" feel. These things are great to have at hand when fiddling with synths while setting up in logic.

  • Which is better and why a = new String("AA") or a = "AA"

    Hi,
    Which is better and why
    String a = new String("AA") or
    String a = "AA"
    Does invoking a construtor waste memory? Please explain in detail.
    Thanks in advance
    Deepak

    > So in case "AA" not there in string pool,
    That is not correct.
    does new creates "AA" on string pool as well as heap memory?Yes. The literal "AA" points to a pooled String object. The new operator creates a new String object with the same character sequence ("AA"). You can verify this with a little code...
    String s = new String("AA");
    assert s != "AA";
    assert s.equals("AA");
    assert s.intern() == "AA";~

  • In and EXISTS??which is better and why

    hi...
    Performance wise which is better IN or EXISTS and why..

    user8469486 wrote:
    hi...
    Performance wise which is better IN or EXISTS and why..DomBrooks pointed out that it may not matter due to query optimization rewrites.
    In theory it depends on circumstances.
    Correlated EXISTS subqueries tend to be efficient if the lookup is properly indexed. If the list of values is very small (especially if you only get one value) an IN subquery might be more efficient.

  • LSMW: Idoc or BAPI; which one is better and why ?

    Hi All,
    In LSMW, given the choices between Idoc and BAPI,which processing method is good and why?
    Please do reply asap. Its urgent.
    Best regards.
    Ram

    The preferece of Import Techniques are:
    1)Batch Input
    2)Direct Input
    3)BAPI's
    4)IDOCS's
    5)Recording
    6)Custom Program
    <b>
    Refer these Links:</b>
    Re: LSMW with Recording or LSMW with BAPI?????
    Regards,
    AS

  • Which i/o approach is better and why?

    can someone please explain which i/o approach is better for obtain the data from the InputStream and why? and consequences for reading streams that contain 2-byte characters?
    thank you.
    InputStream in = conn.openInputStream();
    approach 1
    byte[] byteData = new byte[(int)conn.getLength()];
    in.read(byteData);
    String rawdata = new String(byteData);
    approach 2
    ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
    byte[] buf = new byte[128];
    int t;
    while( (t=in.read(buf)) != -1) {
    baos.write(buf,0,t);
    String rawdata = new String(baos.toByteArray());

    First way will be best in terms of performance: you do all the reading procedure in one sentence, avoiding the chequing of the loop condition check and invoking less times the method read, and you too sabe the memory space required for the object baos you employ in the second approach.
    In performance terms I would say second option saves CPU and memory, so it's better.
    Abraham.

Maybe you are looking for