Sticky group for multiple serverfarms

For ACE, would the inclusion of more than one serverfarm on a sticky group create a conflict for the connections to servers?
On CSM, usig the same sticky group on two different vservers will create a conflict for corresponding serverfarms.
Is this an issue on ACE - should a separate sticky group created foe each ServerFarm?
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.0 address source Group1
timeout 60
replicate sticky
serverfarm SF1
serverfarm SF2
serverfarm SF3

Its same as CSM. You can have just one serverfarm per sticky group.
you should never use the same sticky group for different farms, otherwise that will break the VIP logic i.e. connections meant to serverfarm1 could end up being sent to serverfarm2.
Syed Iftekhar Ahmed

Similar Messages

E-mail group for multiple contacts

I want to creat an e-mail group for multiple contacts so I only need to select the group and then send an e-mail to all the contacts in that group. How do i creat a distribution group in icloud from my Outlook Address book?

Hi,
Yes, when logon to ePrint Center, at the top frame, left hand side, there is a place you can +Add Printer. Click to this and follow the instructions.
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

Tollerence group for multiple user

hii all
can any one tell me how shall i assign multiple tollerence group to multiple user? and also tell me, while creating tollerence group am i have to give the tollerence group with co code? or just only co code?? please solve
regards rajesh Kr Mahato

Hi,
'assign multiple tollerence group to multiple user'-it's not possible,in table V_T043 the key is USNAM
'while creating tollerence group am i have to give the tollerence group with co code? or just only co code??'-I don't understand. In table V_T043T you need to put CC and Tol.group

How to add a default user group for multiple document type's?

Hi,
I am trying to add same default user group for different document types when MA is created. Is there any way to setup using a single "Document Security Template"? Or I need to create different templates for different document types?
Please confirm.
Thanks,
Saloni

Hi Saloni,
Based on what your specific requirement, it might be easier to do it with scripting.
If you are doing it using Document Security Templates, you would have to create a Document Security Template for each of the 6 MA types and assign the default group. Create another one and leave the Document Type field blank, so it will apply to the other 4 MA types that don't have a default group.
Regards,
Vikram

Changing field staus group for multiple accounts

Hi,
Is it possible to change the FSG for multiple accounts at the same time, or does it have to be done one by one through FS00?
Thanks and Regards

Hi Sam,
Try this t-code :
OB_GLACC12
Hope it is useful.

Purchasing Groups for multiple Purchase Organizations

Dear all,
in SRM 5.0 we are using two different purchase organizations which are linked to backend purchase organizations in extended classeical szenario.
When I try to assign purchasing groups linked to backend purchasing groups to both both purchase organizations I get the following error message:
>> Purchasing group xxx in system xxx already assigned to unit xxx
>> Message no. BBP_ATTR030
>>
>> Diagnosis
>> You have attempted to enter the backend ID of a purchasing group or to change an existing one. >> >> However, this backend ID is already allocated to unit xxx (organizational unit xxx) in the organizational structure.
>>
>>
>> Procedure
>> Enter a different backend ID for the selected purchasing group.
Is there a way to assign purchasing groups to more than one purchase org?
Thanks and regards
AD

Hi,
See the solution in the foll thread:
Same Purchasing group assigment to multiple Purchasing Org
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers

CSM: Sticky groups limitation (1..255)

Hi,
The number off total different STICKY GROUPS is limited to 255
This limits directly the number off VSERVERS/SERVERFARMS.
In case I have different serverfarms (and each different vserver maps to only 1 different serverfarm)
AND I want them all to be sticky (for example based on source ip address), I will have to configure
a different sticky group for each serverfarm.
This limits the number off vservers/serverfarms also to the maximun number off sticky groups.
(which is limited to 255)
Correctly or can I bypass this issue?
Thank you, Wim

That's correct.
You can use different form of stickyness that do not require a sticky group, like 'predictor hash'.
Regards,
Gilles.

How do I update grouping or description for multiple items?

As the question implies, I would like to update information in the Grouping and Description fields for multiple items as a way to keep things organized. What I have discovered is that there are some quirks in the new Get Info window that were not in past implementations, which are completely inexplicable and nonsensical to me.
For instance, when you open the Get Info window for an item that has no information in, for instance, the Grouping field, you will not see a Grouping input field, as in this screenshot. The Grouping field should be where the bottom arrow is. Notice also that the Description field is available. I will get back to that in a minute.
If you manually double-click into the Grouping field on the main iTunes screen, you can enter the information there. Then, when you open the Get Info window, ta-dah! The field magically reappears, as in the screenshot below.
The trouble comes when you want to edit this field for multiple tracks. If you select multiple tracks, and they do not all have the Grouping field already populated, the field does not appear. What this means is that you are forced to manually enter the information for every track! This is completely unacceptable when you need to edit information for, as in my case, 122 tracks. The following image shows the Get Info window that appears after selecting two items, one with the Grouping field manually populated, and one with no info in the Grouping field.
Not only has the Grouping field disappeared, but the Description field, as well. Thanks, Apple, but I think I can decide for myself whether or not to populate these fields for multiple items. Let's get 'em back, huh?
SO… does anyone know of any valid method for accomplishing this task? Without manually entering the same information in hundreds of fields? This is the future; computers are supposed to do these monotonous tasks for us, aren't they?
Oh, please don't suggest Option-clicking to open the older, better, Get Info window, as Apple has decided that we should not have that option any longer. We apparently have to organize our music their way. Think different!

The Add Field button was in the editors of 12.0.1 (where the new-style editors had a very "half-finished" feel) - it is not there in 12.1. Apple have determined which metadata fields should be available for each kind of media, with no option for the user to modify this. In Apple's own words: "Get Info has been completely redesigned in iTunes 12 to focus your attention only on what’s necessary for the selected item."
The only options are:
temporarily change the media kind (Options tab) to one that includes the field you want to add values to, enter those values, and then change the media kind back again
make the relevant fields visible in an appropriate list view and edit values there - the big limitation being that you can only do this one item at a time
I can see - to a degree - why Apple may have made some limitations so that metadata elements are available based on their relevance to different media kinds. However, one of the issues mentioned above seems like a bug - if a single audiobook file can have a Description tab, I see no reason at all for that not to be available for multiple items of the same kind.
If not already done so, report these issues and dissatisfaction with the "new" metadata editors in 12.1 (and the absence of a "back door" for the old-style ones) using Apple's iTunes feedback page.

How to go for multiple business group

Dear All.
This is a very common and perhaps very old question now. But I just want to check what is the common process to go through to achieve multiple business groups. We are in oracle 12.1.XX and have single business group but now looking to implement more business group for other countries in same instance. I understand most of the objects would be same and they can be reused like DFF, Locations, Lookups, Value set etc but need to focus more on RICEW components. May I request you to please share your experience on this and let me what are the mandatory steps we need to follow, like running some seeded programs, restructuring other objects, creating seprate DFF, Valueset etc.
Thank you in advance (But that dosent mean I will not thank you later on )
Avinash

Hi Vignesh,
Thanks again for your quick response..
We are not migrating employee records.. we have one business group already and we want to create new business group for newly aquired company which is in other legislation. So just want to know what would be impact on existing BG and what are the objects we can reuse. For example we need to create New responsibilities, Menu, functions, job, position, person type etc.. Similarly we can use existing location, valuesets from existing BG in our new BG. Like this we want to create a list first so that we can plan our implimanation and come up with timeline..
I hope it is clear now.
Thanks,
Avinash

Need for multiple ASM disk groups on a SAN with RAID5??

Hello all,
I've successfully installed clusterware, and ASM on a 5 node system. I'm trying to use asmca (11Gr2 on RHEL5)....to configure the disk groups.
I have a SAN, which actually was previously used for a 10G ASM RAC setup...so, reusing the candidate volumes that ASM has found.
I had noticed on the previous incarnation....that several disk groups had been created, for example:
ASMCMD> ls
DATADG/
INDEXDG/
LOGDG1/
LOGDG2/
LOGDG3/
LOGDG4/
RECOVERYDG/
Now....this is all on a SAN....which basically has two pools of drives set up each in a RAID5 configuration. Pool 1 contains ASM volumes named ASM1 - ASM32. Each of these logical volumes is about 65 GB.
Pool #2...has ASM33 - ASM48 volumes....each of which is about 16GB in size.
I used ASM33 from pool#2...by itself to contain my cluster voting disk and OCR.
My question is....with this type setup...would doing so many disk groups as listed above really do any good for performance? I was thinking with all of this on a SAN, which logical volumes on top of a couple sets of RAID5 disks...the divisions on the disk group level with external redundancy would do anything?
I was thinking of starting with about half of the ASM1-ASM31 'disks'...to create one large DATADG disk group, which would house all of the database instances data, indexes....etc. I'd keep the remaining large candidate disks as needed for later growth.
I was going to start with the pool of the smaller disks (except the 1 already dedicated to cluster needs) to basically serve as a decently sized RECOVERYDG...to house logs, flashback area...etc. It appears this pool is separate from pool #1...so, possibly some speed benefits there.
But really...is there any need to separate the diskgroups, based on a SAN with two pools of RAID5 logical volumes?
If so, can someone give me some ideas why...links on this info...etc.
Thank you in advance,
cayenne

The best practice is to use 2 disk groups, one for data and the other for the flash/fast recovery area. There really is no need to have a disk group for each type of file, in fact the more disks in a disk group (to a point I've seen) the better for performance and space management. However, there are times when multiple disk groups are appropriate (not saying this is one of them only FYI), such as backup/recovery and life cycle management. Typically you will still get benefit from double stripping, i.e. having a SAN with RAID groups presenting multiple LUNs to ASM, and then having ASM use those LUNs in disk groups. I saw this in my own testing. Start off with a minimum of 4 LUNs per disk group, and add in pairs as this will provide optimal performance (at least it did in my testing). You should also have a set of standard LUN sizes to present to ASM so things are consistent across your enterprise, the sizing is typically done based on your database size. For example:
300GB LUN: database > 10TB
150GB LUN: database 1TB to 10 TB
50GB LUN: database < 1TB
As databases grow beyond the threshold the larger LUNs are swapped in and the previous ones are swapped out. With thin provisioning it is a little different since you only need to resize the ASM LUNs. I'd also recommend having at least 2 of each standard sized LUNs ready to go in case you need space in an emergency. Even with capacity management you never know when something just consumes space too quickly.
ASM is all about space savings, performance, and management :-).
Hope this helps.

How do I make groups for texting multiple people at a time and retain that group for future use?

How do I make goups, in Contacts, for texting multiple people at a time and retain that group for future use?

How do I make goups, in Contacts, for texting multiple people at a time and retain that group for future use?

ASDM multiple network objects vs group for rules

I was just curious if there are any performance benefits of using multiple network objects on multiple rules vs consolidating them into fewer rules by grouping them?
For example, I have about 10 lines of NAT exempt rules from the same source to multiple destinations. Is there anything to be gained if I consolidated those into a single rule using an object group for the multiple destinations aside from cleaning up the clutter in ASDM?
Thanks

Hello Tony,
Of course, it will be better because the processing that the ASA is going to use to determine witch rule to match would be decremented, also it would take less space on the configuration file (memory). those are some of the pros regarding creating groups for particular rules.
Sometimes a huge configuration file can increment the CPU usage,etc,etc. so it is better to keep it as small and organized as possible.
Please rate helpful posts.
Regards,
Julio

Purchasing group transacting for multiple purchasing organizations

Hi,
I have a requirement in which i have certain purchasers defined as purchasing groups in my organizational structure. However, these purchasing groups perform sourcing transactions (e.g., bid invitation, auction) for multiple purchasing organizations. In the organizational structure, these purchasing groups are created under an organizational unit that isn't defined as a purchasing organization. They appear "free-floating" since they are not assigned to a particular purchasing organization.
In sourcing transactions (e.g., bid invitation, auction), the list of purchasing groups from which I can choose from depends on the purchasing organization I select. Is there a way to include the "free floating" purchasing groups in the drop-down list?
Thanks and regards,
Joy

Hi Joy,
Its difficult to have a P.Grp with out a P.Org assignment.
My idea would be:
Assign this P.Grp to one of the P.Orgs (lets say POrg1). Add the entire root as the responsibility of this P.Grp.
When the Purchasers in this P.Grp create a Bid Invitation, the POrg1 will be defaulted always.
At the time of saving the Bid Invitation, use the "BBP_PGRP_ASSIGN_BADI" BADI to overwrite POrg1 value with any other POrg you desire.
You may test it out.
Cheers,
Akash

10g: unable to set default dashpoard (portalpath) for multiple groups

Hi All,
I am facing a problem while setting portal path for multiple groups.
I have two RPD groups and each group need to have it's own default dashboard as a lending page.
We are using RPD authentication and can't use database table to save portalpath for each user or group.
What have I tried so far is as follows:
We have two groups Group1 and Group2 which need to have default dashboard as *\shared\_portal\dashboard1* and *\shared\_portal\dashboard2* respectively.
Approach 1: Create a Session INIT block with the following query:
select case when 'Group1' = ':GROUP' then '\shared\_portal\dashboard1' else '\shared\_portal\dashboard2' end from dual
Result: Failed - As all the users are directed to '\shared\_portal\dashboard2'. Somehow *':Group'* isn't getting the GROUP assigned.
Even tried replacing ':GROUP' with 'VALUEOF(GROUP)' in SQL query, however it didn't help.
Any help with achieving the same functionality will be appreciated.
Regards,
Kansal

Kansal,
Here you go...make use of below example and change as per you need.
Create a SESSION - INIT BLOCK with this in query...Say PPIB
SELECT CASE WHEN 'VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.GROUP)' = 'DASH_usr' THEN '/shared/test' WHEN 'VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.GROUP)' = 'DASH_ctr' THEN '/shared/test1' END FROM DUAL
Assign a variable to it with name PORTALPATH and default to anything say '/abc/'
This will work for sure...You can test this in RPD as well.
Hope this helps

EWT calculation for multiple skill groups at Courtesy Callback

Hi All,
I have configured CVP courtesy callback. Call is coming to callback number and call connected with agent .
I have configured EWT for only one skill group. Now I need to calculate proper EWT for multiple skillgroups.
To calculate EWT for ACTV skill group I used the below formula.
ValidValue(((SkillGroup.ACTV.RouterCallsQNow+1)*(ValidValue(SkillGroup.ACTV.AvgHandledCallsT
imeTo5,20))/max( SkillGroup.ACTV.Ready, (SkillGroup.ACTV.TalkingIn +
SkillGroup.ACTV.TalkingOut + SkillGroup.ACTV.TalkingOther))),100)
Now I need to calculate EWT for multiple skillgroups.
Kindly guide me to configure EWT for multiple skillgroups.
Regards,
Fakhrul

Did you get this sorted out? Can you post an example. Thanks a bunch.

Sticky group for multiple serverfarms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for