Still no Vista 64 bit support?

I have been reading the forums with a rapidly sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach. After having a TX for only a year, I now have to find another product. I just bought a new puter, and it's running Vista 64 bit. I have had Palms for years, but since they seemingly have no plans to release the software for Vista 64 bit, even though pretty soon that's what everyone will have, my TX is useless to me. It seems that it's been more than a year since they said they were "working" on it, but I am thinking that was only the 32 bit version.
If you have read the forums, then you are also aware of the Bluetooth Solution which is available.
Because there really isn't anything more to add to the discussion (other than hoping maybe the new Palm OS under development will have 64 bit support), we'll close this thread.
Post relates to: Centro (AT&T)
Message Edited by smkranz on 08-19-2008 10:53 AM
smkranz
I am a volunteer, and not an HP employee.
Palm OS ∙ webOS ∙ Android

Similar Messages

Lack of true Ubuntu 64-bit support for Connect add-in

Dear Adobe,
This well-worn conversation seems to have been asked a few times before, and ignored a few times before, so you'll forgive me for re-opening it again.
I downloaded the 64-bit debian package of your Adobe Connect add-in yesterday from Adobe's website. Here it is sitting on my local disk:
$ ls ~/.shared/
total 540108
drwxrwxrwx 2 root     root          4096 2012-05-31 15:00 ./
drwxr-xr-x 5 root     root          4096 2012-04-23 22:24 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 root     root     540016672 2012-05-27 00:03 temp.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root     root       4026194 2012-05-30 22:51 ConnectAddin64.deb
I then installed the package. However, when I tried to join my meeting, before the "Connecting..." screen appears with the progress bar, a blank white page flashed very briefly saying "Adobe Connect add-in not installed". Unsurprisingly, I wasn't able to join my meeting, and your online diagnostics site also confirmed that the add-in wasn't installed in my browser (Firefox 11).
Then, reading other users' tales of woe, I located and analysed the installed binary, and this is what I saw:
$ readelf -h /usr/local/connectaddin
ELF Header:
Magic:   7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Class:                             ELF32
Data:                              2's complement, little endian
Version:                           1 (current)
OS/ABI:                            UNIX - System V
ABI Version:                       0
Type:                              EXEC (Executable file)
Machine:                           Intel 80386
Version:                           0x1
Entry point address:               0x8055810
Start of program headers:          52 (bytes into file)
Start of section headers:          7629080 (bytes into file)
Flags:                             0x0
Size of this header:               52 (bytes)
Size of program headers:           32 (bytes)
Number of program headers:         9
Size of section headers:           40 (bytes)
Number of section headers:         42
Section header string table index: 39
This is a 32-bit binary. There is absolutely no mistake about it. And even though it is a GTK binary, it fails to work on a 64-bit system with 32-bit dual support due to the fact it appears to have the search paths to its libraries hard-coded into it:
$ export GTK_PATH=/usr/lib32/gtk-2.0
$ ./connectaddin
(connectaddin:5416): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-ibus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
(connectaddin:5416): Gtk-WARNING **: Loading IM context type 'ibus' failed
You notice how GTK_PATH is ignored. The path in the above message is where the 32-bit binary would be sitting if I were on a 32-bit native system. However, as I'm on a 64-bit system, my 32-bit libraries are in:
$ ls /usr/lib32/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules
total 180
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2012-05-31 17:23 ./
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2012-05-31 17:38 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18740 2011-04-15 02:48 im-am-et.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5516 2011-04-15 02:48 im-cedilla.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7060 2011-04-15 02:48 im-cyrillic-translit.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17976 2011-03-04 13:49 im-ibus.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7484 2011-04-15 02:48 im-inuktitut.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6160 2011-04-15 02:48 im-ipa.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9620 2011-04-15 02:48 im-multipress.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9540 2011-04-15 02:48 im-thai.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18728 2011-04-15 02:48 im-ti-er.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18728 2011-04-15 02:48 im-ti-et.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7372 2011-04-15 02:48 im-viqr.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26284 2011-04-15 02:48 im-xim.so
Will somebody please let us users know when Adobe will be (or won't be, for that matter) actually providing a true 64-bit linux version of their Adobe Connect add-in, instead of packaging the 32-bit version of the add-in in an archive that says 64-bit?
Thanks in advance,

That is the last supported player for Linux using the NPAPI. Chrome's new API, PPAPI, is still going to be supported in Linux, Mac and PC OS's and will have the current version of Flash Player for all those OS's.
Here is Adobe's statement regarding Flash Player on Linux OS's.
Adobe wrote:
Linux:
Adobe has been working closely with Google to develop a single, modern API for hosting plug-ins within the browser. The PPAPI, code-named "Pepper", aims to provide a layer between the plug-in and browser that abstracts away differences between browser and operating system implementations. You can find more information on the Pepper API at http://code.google.com/p/ppapi/.
Because of this work, Adobe has been able to partner with Google in providing a "Pepper" implementation of Flash Player for all x86/64 platforms supported by the Google Chrome browser. Google will begin distributing this new Pepper-based Flash Player as part of Chrome on all platforms, including Linux, later this year.
For Flash Player releases after 11.2, the Flash Player browser plug-in for Linux will only be available via the "Pepper" API as part of the Google Chrome browser distribution and will no longer be available as a direct download from Adobe. Adobe will continue to provide security updates to non-Pepper distributions of Flash Player 11.2 on Linux for five years from its release.
Flash Player will continue to support browsers using non-"Pepper" plug-in APIs on platforms other than Linux.
Adobe will be providing a debug player implementation of the Flash Player browser plug-in on Linux, and will update this document once there are more details on how it will be distributed.
The full release can be seen here: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html

Vista 64 support for Gamers

Hi, When are we going to see Vista 64 support for gamers? Most gamers are now buying Vista 64 over 32 because of the fact that Vista uses up to .3gb memory at desktop and with modern games using up to 2Gb, only Vista 64 can meet the memory requirements (32 bit can't support 4Gb of installed memory, as it can't address it all. - Install 4Gb and you only get around 3gb reported). Yet I fail to see on these forums any mention of 64 bit support despite a huge take up. The Incrysis forums?have a poll of 24,000 users which shows that 4% intend to adopt DX0 and therefore Vista before Crysis comes out in Q3. Reading the forums, everyone is opting for 64. Same on story Toms Hardware, 64 far more popular as a switch than 32. As gamers are by far and large the biggest purchasers of cards such as the XFI, I'd have thought that 64 bit support would have been a priority. For whats its worth, the current drivers work fine on my 64 installation around the desktop, but presumably will suffer the same problems as everyone else with Movie and game sound decoding. Hence the request for support. (I'm currently waiting on Crysis / Quake Wars before gaming again).

every port will install native under vista x64. if displaylink isn't picked up then you can download the driver here.
(edit: typo)
Message Edited by erik on 09-12-2008 08:58 PM
ThinkStation C20
ThinkPad X1C · X220 · X60T · s30 · 600

CS5 and 64 bits support: what implications?

Hi folks,
I would like to ask the question like this: does the 64 bits support mean i will have to purchase 64 bits machines for my CS5 copy?
Thank you for your helps.

Yes, you will need to have a 64-bit operating system and a 64-bit processor.
For Mac OS, Leopard (10.5) and Snow Leopard (10.6) are already capable of running 64-bit applications, and any Macintosh sold in the last few years can run 64-bit software.
For Windows, you need 64-bit Windows 7 or 64-bit Windows Vista.
For system requirements, see this page:
http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/systemreqs/

10-bit Support from GeForce Card?

I've had Photoshop CC 2014 on my system for a while, and I was surprised to see an option for 30-bit color in the preferences. I have a GeForce GTX 970, and I thought 10-bit color was reserved for those with Quadro/FirePro cards. I'm on Windows 8.1 Pro with a 10-bit 2K BenQ CAD/CAM monitor connected with DP. With this option enabled, am I actually getting 10-bit color, or is it just ignoring that preference?
Thanks!
Mike

Don't pop the champagne right away. The pearly gate to 10-bit heaven is still not opening.
That checkbox just means Photoshop will deliver on its end, but the rest of the chain needs to be there as well. I can check that box too, but I know I don't have the video card for it although everything else is ready.
Quadro / FirePro still applies. There were rumors of the "high-end" Radeons getting 10-bit support, but that was based on a beta driver and never came to anything AFAIK.
Even when it all supposedly works, it's not all it's cranked up to be: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1295887 (from post 17 and down). With a good monitor/calibration system banding is a non-issue anyway.

HT6010 I have tried to update my iOS 7.3.0 and I keep getting a msg saying bit connected to the Internet and I am connected by WiFi plus my phone has Internet connected also, I have repeatedly clicked on retry, still get message bit connected to Internet

I have tried to update my iOS 7.3.0 and I keep getting a msg saying bit connected to the Internet and I am connected by WiFi plus my phone has Internet connected also, I have repeatedly clicked on retry, still get message bit connected to Internet

Try this support document http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3694 and look at this section.
Unable to contact the iOS software update server gs.apple.com
Error 1004, 1013, 1638, 3194: These errors may be the result of the connection to gs.apple.com being redirected or blocked. Follow these steps to resolve these errors:
Install the latest version of iTunes.
Check security software. Ensure that communication to gs.apple.com is allowed. Follow this article for assistance with security software. iTunes for Windows: Troubleshooting security software issues.
Check the hosts file. The restore will fail if there is an active entry to redirect gs.apple.com. Follow iTunes: Advanced iTunes Store troubleshooting to edit the hosts file or revert to a default hosts file. See section "Blocked by configuration: (Mac OS X/Windows) > Rebuild network information".
Try to restore from another known-good computer and network.
If the errors persist on another computer, the device may need service.

Standard version left behind on 64-bit support

How come 64-bit support is only available for the enterprise
version?
I shelled out a lot of money for various versions of Cold
Fusion standard but now I feel ripped off.
64-bit support has been slow to come on CF and is not even
available unless you're an enterprise customer.
What gives?

The following still run as 32-bit in the enterprise edition:
DataDirect Drivers, Verity Search functionality, and
ColdFusion .Net integration.
With that said they should have included the 32-bit version
of any 3rd-party driver where the cost is an issue, Adobe would
explained why and we would understand. Instead they chose a path
where they seem greedy.

What CC Applications are still only 32-bit?

Is there some way to determine whether a given Creative Cloud application is still only 32-bit? I mean other than creating a 64-bit package and looking to see if it installs to Program Files or Program Files (x86)? That's what I've been doing, but I've since discovered after re-packaging Photoshop and installing it on a test system, that it's now available as 64-bit application. Can I get notified of changes like this?

Hi jpt65,
Which desktop applications in Creative Cloud require 64-bit operating systems?
With the new CC apps, most of the pro video and audio applications now require 64-bit operating systems to run. These native 64-bit applications include Adobe Premiere® Pro CC, Adobe Audition® CC, After Effects® CC, Prelude® CC, and SpeedGrade® CC. Photoshop CC and Lightroom® also require 64-bit on Mac OS.
Why is Adobe switching some of its applications to a native 64-bit architecture?
By optimizing code for 64-bit operating systems, Adobe is able to deliver the performance gains that creative professionals require. Most of Adobe's pro video applications now require a 64-bit operating system, but the majority of video professionals have already transitioned to 64-bit capable systems, such as Mac OS X v10.7 (Lion) or v10.8 (Mountain Lion), or 64-bit versions of Microsoft® Windows® 7 or Windows 8. Because 64-bit operating systems offer superior performance, current and future releases of most of the Adobe professional video and audio applications will not support 32-bit operating systems.
Regards,
Romit Sinha

Mavericks 32-bit support files?

I got a little ambitious and removed all of the 32-bit support files using a handy utility called Monolingual.
Turns out I need them to run Adobe Illustrator 5.1 and InDesign 5.5. I'm hoping I can use Time Machine to retrive the files I deleted... where can I find them in the System folder?

First, delete "Monolingual" and never install anything like it again. Then see below.
If you don't already have a current backup, back up all data, then reinstall the OS.* You don't need to erase the startup volume, and you won't need the backup unless something goes wrong. If the system was upgraded from an older version of OS X, you may need the Apple ID and password you used.
There are ways to back up a computer that isn't fully functional. Ask if you need guidance.
If you installed the Java runtime distributed by Apple and still need it, you'll have to reinstall it. The same goes for Xcode.
*The linked support article refers to OS X 10.9 ("Mavericks"), but the procedure is the same for OS X 10.7 ("Lion") and later.

"Invalid Binary" error on app. Apple's reason is "Missing 64-bit support" due to changes from Feb 1st 2015

Hello
Can anyone help me with an "Invalid Binary" error on my app.
Apple's response is:
Dear developer,
We have discovered one or more issues with your recent submission for "DPS Notes". To process your submission, the following issues must be corrected:
Missing 64-bit support - Beginning on February 1, 2015 new iOS apps submitted to the App Store must include 64-bit support and be built with the iOS 8 SDK. Beginning June 1, 2015 app updates will also need to follow the same requirements. To enable 64-bit in your project, we recommend using the default Xcode build setting of “Standard architectures” to build a single binary with both 32-bit and 64-bit code.
Once these issues have been corrected, use Xcode or Application Loader to upload a new binary to iTunes Connect. Choose the new binary on the app’s Details page in My Apps on iTunes Connect, and click Submit for Review.
Regards,
The App Store team
Can someone from the Adobe DPS team let me know how I can recreate the .ipa file so that it will meet Apple's requirements.
They seem to have moved the goalposts since I created the original .ipa file in December. I thought I'd submitted it, just went back through iTunes Connect to check info as I hadn't heard anything from them, then hit this brick wall. Any help offered would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Rebecca

Hi
I've Updated App Builder, gone back to the DPS App Builder portal, regenerated new zip and ipa files and downloaded them.
I clicked the Application Loader 3.0 link, downloaded the latest Appication Version, clicked on the "Deliver your App" button, and submitted the newly built App that was built using 32.4.2 version. (All the app icons were listed as "stored on server" so I presume they are all ok). The .zip file appeared to 'deliver' to Apple successfully. I've tried to resubmit it but get ta "Redundant Binary Upload. There already exists a binary upload with build version..." error message, so presume the orginal binary upload was successful. I have no idea how I can get this app from the "prepare for submission", to "in review". The last time I thought I'd submitted this app I got as far as the "waiting for review" status, and no further.
At the moment I don't have a"+" button in the Build section - as mentioned on page 66 of Adobe's Step_by_step_guide_to_dps_se.pdf.
So I can't add the new .zip file to the iTunes Connect > My Apps portal in the Build section of the Versions tab.
I have put a support email into Apple, but don't expect a reply any day soon.
The problem with starting all the way back through the App wizard is that I really want to use all the same App Name, Bundle ID, and details etc.
Do you mean, going back to the Folio Producer Panel, and building a whole new App?
This process certainly isn't for the faint-hearted!
HELP!

Still no full retina support, even with the new CC Apps?

Hello over there!
I just bought the full CC abo, after trying PS and Indesign and becoming a fan of the new workflow, that is possible with the upcoming new CC Apps (Muse, Edge Tools...).
Now, after getting things right and downloading the needed Apps to my Macbook Pro (15" Retina) - I was very disappointed. The updated CC version of Dreamweaver and even some of the completely new Apps still have blurry text fields and buttons/layout graphics in it. Acrobat Pro XI is still a laggy, blurry fail on retina. The Mac OS Preview is sharp and scrolls a 600 pages PDF in seconds.
I mean... Srsly? This would be okay if the retina MBP came out last month. But it came last year. I'm really a big fan of the Adobe workflow and functionality, this is why I upgraded and decided to spend some hundreds of dollars for it ( and become friends with the new and scary rent model ). But the best program is a pain, when your eyes start being overly stressed after 20 minutes of work, especially when you're already looking at hundres of code lines (And I'm 21 years old, so I'm glad to still have those good working eyes..). I remember when I fell totally in love with Dreamweaver because it was able to handle the amount of information in a good stucturized and clearly visible way. But the only really sharp and "look like it fits all together"-Apps are PS, AI and ID as far as I tried for now.
Definitely affected are: DW, Muse, Edge Animate and Reflow (What? They are new!?)
So, thats my question: Are there any official statements that this will be fixed? Im confused because Adobe is just partying about the retina-compatibility updates last fall/winter in blogs and descriptions. The blurry App elements are not mentioned. I really want to know this, to be able to take back my contract and abo in time and get a refund. Would be sad, but the only option to me.
Thanks very much for reading and helping in advance. I really do not want to troll or sound agressive. The Adobe Suite is a very very big product and it does very good. But I'm simply disappointed about the handling of retina support, which is essential for users like me.
English is not my main language, I hope everything was clear.
Best regards,
D. Fuchs

Hi David,
thank you for your effort. If I remember correctly you said you’ll also hand through this issue/question to the tech guys. Does this mean I’ll get further information? Because this article you found is about 10 month old and I’d like to get this issue verified.
Furthermore, Acrobat (XI) is not even mentioned in that article and this is what brings the most problems.
I really don’t like to be a stressing customer, but I think a official answer to this issue is definitely possible und should be made.
I’ll attach a few hardcopy pictures of the issue. Don’t know if it helps, but it proofs.
Thanks again and best regards,
D. Fuchs
Am 25.06.2013 um 01:17 schrieb David__B <[email protected]>:
Re: Still no full retina support, even with the new CC Apps?
created by David__B in Adobe Creative Cloud - View the full discussion
Hi D.
I found this http://blogs.adobe.com/creativelayer/new-macbook-pro-retina-display-su pport/
I believe has been added to Photoshop, Illustrator and Lightroom so far. Hopefully it will be added to Dreamweaver soon too.
Kind regards,
-Dave
Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5445698#5445698
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5445698#5445698
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5445698#5445698. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in Adobe Creative Cloud by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go tohttp://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Sun Cluster 3.1 64 bit support for Solaris 10

Hi:
I have some questions when migrate SC 3.1 from solaris 9 to solaris 10.
1) Does Clutster 3.1 for solaris 10 support 64 bit?
I have develop own resource type which is compiled with 64 bit mode, while cluster admin program is 32 bit based. E.g. /usr/cluster/bin/scrgadm
Will that cause any problem? For instance: 32 bit lib and 64 bit lib have the same name libscha.so will be loaded by 32 bit scrgadm and 64 bit my own developped resource type program.
2) Can I download a Cluster 3.1 install-pkg for solaris 10, 64 bit supported., which means all admin files like scrgadm are 64 bit based.
Or only ONE Cluster 3.1 version for solaris 10 is deliveried by SUN?
Thanks in advance!
BRs
//rdctahu

Hi,
Comments on your 2 questions:
1) Yes. IIRC, SC31 for S10 actually supports ONLY 64 bit. To be clear, this means
Solaris has to be booted in 64 bit mode, but 32 bit applications would run just
fine.
As for your RT being 64 bit, and scrgadm being 32 bit, no problem.
2) See (1). You are good.
Go for it.
HTH,
-ashu

Windows 7, 64 bit support to Crystal Reports XI R2 SP5

Will the Windows 7, 64 bit support to Crystal Reports XI R2 SP5 be added?
Moving to CR 12 is the only solutions?
What are the options?
regards,
Srini

Hi Srini,
No, XI R2 is getting close to legacy mode so no new OS platforms will be added unless some large Partner requests it. Cr 12 is the only option, R2 will likely anyways. It wont be officially supported but it should work.
Thank you
Don

Why doesn't elements 12 have 64 bit support for PC users?

Why doesn't elements 12 have 64 bit support for PC users? Most PC's these days are shipped with far more than 2GB of RAM. This move seems very limiting to those with high demands for RAM. Image sizes are only getting larger meaning more RAM needed for adjustments and editing. I have been putting off buying elements 11 waiting to see if 12 had 64 bit support and I am very disappointed to find it doesn't. I can't see myself buying 12 unless a 64 bit for PC is launched soon.

Update? It's a major release, ain't it?
Mac got the 64-bit. Why? From Pete Green's announcement:
A handful of features from previous versions are not available in Photoshop Elements 12 due to new product support for 64-bit systems.
But, of course, Windows users have no such need...

When can we have Product Store ANE with 64 Bit Support

Hi,
We are using Product Store ANE from Gaming SDK 1.4 . With the medatory requirement of 64-bit support by Apple we are unable to submit our apps. Is it possible either to get the source code or a 64-bit ANE.
Thanks
Rahul

I created a hello-world application with only the productStore.ane and exported a release build, it failed again.
Then i unchecked the flag Hide-ANE-Library-Symbols and it was successful.
Successful package :
Unfortunately i cannot use this option in the main app as a bunch of other ANEs will start failing.
Taking a very wild guess as this option was added from AIR 3.4 the current one targeting 3.1 might have something to do with it.
Anton Azarov did you try with the Hide-ANE-Library-Symbols checked ?
Abhinav Dhandh can you check if you guys can reproduce this and help me out.
Thanks
Shantanu

Still no Vista 64 bit support?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for