Still puzzled by RF pass through

T2100 box. The RF passthrough on/off setting does not seem to do anything. If the box is either on or in low eco standby the RF signal is passed through. If it is in high eco standby (or off) the signal is not passed through. Thisi regardless of the RF pass through setting.

That is how that box is speced to work .... it is as described in its user guide TV without Youview section on p29 of current guide.
The power consumptions and the low eco modes for the original and newer Youview boxes are different
Apparently LOW eco mode is achieved by switching off little more the the video output to the TV, unlike the HIGH mode which shuts down pretty much every function apart from those needed to complete planned recording - passthru is not needed for that so it is not enabled on that model in that mode,

Similar Messages

Pass Through Theme Still Not "Passing Through"

So I'm working on this project and it looks completely AWESOME on my computer with the "pass through" theme, but when I burn it to DVD I just get a blurry picture behind a "white" scrolling title. I know this has been addressed before and I've checked out all the "fixes" so far on this issue from past topics but I'm still pulling my hair out.
I've tried "deleting my preferences" and "repairing my permissions" but still end up with the same thing... a white scrolling text over a blurry picture. My Mac is only 2 months old!
Perhaps the solution is to just fly my family out to watch the dvd on my computer???
Help! Anyone? Bueller?

Nevermind!
I went back to an awesome answer by Rich839 who suggested the following:
+Sometimes permissions and preferences can get corrupted. Whenever iDVD starts acting funny, a common maintenance procedure is to do the following: Delete preferences by closing iDVD and trashing the file com.apple.iDVD.plist found in User (the House icon)/Library/Preferences. Then do a permissions repair using the Utilities/Disk Utility App on your Mac. Open the Disk Utilities window and select the Mac hard drive icon at the top of the side pane at the left. Then click on the Repair Permissions button. When you have repaired permissions and deleted preferences, restart your computer and launch iDVD. iDVD will replace the .plist file that you deleted. Be sure also that you have sufficient free disk space on your hard drive for iDVD to function correctly. 25GB often is recommended by users of this forum. After doing all of the above, relaunch iDVD and see whether you still have the problem.+
I failed to restart my computer after deleting and repairing, but after I did the above seemed to work! *crosses fingers* At least the "Pass Through" feature seems to be working in the little preview window while it's burning. Before, the scrolling text in the preview window was just white!
Hope this somehow helps others who've had the same issue!

HT201263 my iphone 4 has this same issue, did these steps but when it was doing the software update, half way through my phone still wouldn't move pass the apple logo. help!

my iphone 4 has this same issue, did these steps but when it was doing the software update, half way through my phone still wouldn't move pass the apple logo. help!

Please see the two articles below:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3694
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3125

Data has changed after passing through FIFO?

Dear experts,
I am currently working on a digital triangular shaping using the 7966R FPGA + 5734 AI. I am using LabView 2012 SP1.
Some days ago I have encountered a problem with my FIFOs that I have not been able to solve since. I'd be glad if somebody could point out a solution/ my error.
Short description:
I am writing U16 variables between ~32700-32800 to a U16 configured FIFO. The FIFO output does not coincide with the data I have been writing to the FIFO but is rather bit-shifted or something is added. This problem does not occure if I execute the VI on the dev. PC with simulated input.
What I have done so far:
I am reading all 4 channels of the 5734 inside a SCTL. The data is stored in 4 feedback nodes I am applying a triangular shaping to channel 0 and 1 by using 4 FIFOs that have been prefilled with a predefined number of zeros to serve as buffers. So it's something like (FB = Feedback node):
A I/O 1 --> FB --> FIFO 1 --> FB --> FIFO 2 --> FB --> Do something
A I/O 2 --> FB --> FIFO 3 --> FB --> FIFO 4 --> FB --> Do something
This code shows NO weird behaviour and works as expected.
The Problem:
To reduce the amount of FIFOs needed I then decided to interleave the data and to use only 2 FIFOs instead of 4. You can see the code in the attachment. As you can see I have not really changed anything to the code structure in general.
The input to the FIFO is a U16. All FIFOs are configured to store U16 data.
The data that I am writing to the FIFO can be seen in channel 0 of the output attachment.
The output after passing through the two FIFOs can be seen in channel 2 of the same picture.
The output after passing through the first FIFO (times 2) can be seen in channel 3 of the picture.
It looks like the output is bit-shifted and truncated as it enters Buffer 1. Yet the difference between the input and output is not exactly a factor of 2. I also considered the possibility that the FIFO adds both write operations (CH0 + CH1) but that also does not account for the value of the output.
The FIFOs are all operating normally, i.e. none throws a timeout. I also tried several different orders of reading/writing to the FIFOs and different ways of ensuring this order (i.e. case strucutres, flat and stacked sequence). The FIFOs are also large enough to store the amount of data buffered no matter if I write or read first.
Thank you very much,
Bjorn
Attachments:
FPGA-code.png ‏61 KB
FPGA-output.png ‏45 KB

During the last couple of days I tried the following:
1. Running the FPGA code on the development PC with simulated I/O. The behavior was normal, i.e. like I've intended the code to perform.
2. I tested the code on the development PC with the square and sine wave generation VI as 'simulated' I/O. The code performed normal.
3. I replaced the FIFOs with queues and ran my logic on the dev. PC. The logic performed totally normal.
4. Right now the code is compiling with constants as inputs like you suggested...
I am currently trying to get LabView 2013 on the development machine. It seems like my last real hope is that the issue is a bug in the XILINX 13.4 compiler tools and that the 14.4 tools will just make it disappear...
Nevertheless I am still open for suggestions. Some additional info about my FIFOs of concerne:
Buffer 1 and 2:
- Type: Target Scoped
- Elements Requested: 1023
- Implementation: Block Memory
- Control Logic: Target Optimal
- Data Type: U16
- Arbitrate for Read: Never Arbitrate
- No. Elements Per Read: 1
- Arbitrate for Write: Never Arbitrate
- No. Elements Per Write: 1
The inputs from the NI 5734 are U16 so I am wirering the right data type to the FIFOs. I also don't have any coercion dots within my FPGA VI. And so far it has only occured after the VI has been compiled onto the FPGA. Could some of the FIFOs/block memory be corrupted because we have written stuff onto the FPGA too often?

X240 - is there audio pass-through when using a miniDP to HDMI?

I have an X240, which I love, but now that I've cut my cable cord and am going with Netflix and other on-line streaming options, I'd like to be able to view my streaming programs on my TV. Can I use a cable or adapter to go from the miniDP (on the X240) to my HDMI (on my TV) and get audio as well as video? I understand my laptop needs to have an "audio pass-through" for that to work --- I don't know what it is, but I'd like to know if this one's got it. I bought the laptop online in Dec 2013, if that makes a difference.
(Yes, I could stream Netflix from a gadget like Chromecast, but that will only get me Netflix Canada, whereas using a VPN on my computer I can get Netflix from other countries too.)

refreshing this discussion! I've tried a mini DP to HDMI dongle with an HDMI-HDMI cable to the TV - and I get video but no audio. My computer recognizes the TV as present as as audio playback device, but no audio is transmitted through TV or computer. when it's plugged in. Of course I still get audio from the computer's speakers when it's not plugged in

Passing through XML in HTML forms without it being displayed in Web Browser

Dear all
I have some MapViewer XML stored in a variable, which I wish to pass through a HTML form. However whenever I insert the variable into the form and run the procedure, my web browser starts reading the actual XML and treating it as HTML, since it is only part of a complete XML script. Even if it was a complete XML script, it would still try and display it. Is there away of making sure the value is passed through without being read by the browser?
For example:
PROCEDURE DISPLAY
AS
var_xml VARCHAR2(32767) :='<theme name="theme_county"/>';
htp.print('<INPUT TYPE = "hidden"
                  NAME ="var_xml"
                  VALUE = "' || var_xml || '" />Then causes the output to the browser to become:
htp.print('<INPUT TYPE = "hidden"
                  NAME ="var_xml"
                  VALUE = "<theme name="theme_county"/>" />The browser is of course reading the XML as HTML.
Kind regards
Tim

Dear all
I have now resolved the problem by submitting values which can then be used to recreate the xml in another function, rather than actually submitting the xml itself through the forms. This makes more sense and avoids people having to see any of the xml.
Kind regards
Tim

Pass through scenario in SAP PI with no mapping for File to IDoc and Idoc to file scenarios

Hi Experts,
Can i have step by step process in SAP PI for pass through scenario with no mapping in case of file to Idoc and Idoc to file both cases please.
What objects i can skip.
My PI system is 7.3 dual stack.
I have seen below blogs, still its confusing to me.
When and how to create an scenario in SAP PI without mapping objects.
Pass Through Scenario with no Mapping in PI 7.1
Appreciate your help on this.
Regards,
Mohan.

Hi Mohan
In pass thru interface you don't need to create any ESR objects, only ID objects are required.
Just Create a Receiver Determination and Receiver Agreement for your scenario (no need for Interface Det. and Sender Agreement).
Specify the IDOC in the Sender Interface and namespace as urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
Or instead of creating objects manually, Run the wizard with Idoc name/namespace in sender/receiver interface
Regards
Osman

Pass through camera, looking to buy. Suggestions?

Hi,
I'm looking to streamline how I make videos. I've tried using iMovie with a Canon Vixia HF200. But couldn't get the video from the card. I maxed out my RAM to 8 GB, put in a 1TB drive and still didn't work. I did the trial of FCP and while that made importing video from the card, I'm not sold on the expense of that app just yet. (Editing in it was hard as I should have spent the $$ on a 7200 RPM drive instead of a 5400.)
The videos I'm trying to make are demos of my classical guitar performances for youtube, FB etc. The first one I did used the iSight camera with a decent mic: AKG 420. The Canon takes a nice picture but the hassle of using Handbrake and syncing audio from Garageband is just not my idea of how I can best accomplish the task for my needs. Further, the pass through allows me to have a video monitor when I'm setting the shots up by myself.
So, valued community, would you have any suggestions for a camera that might fit the

Hi,
I'm looking to streamline how I make videos. I've tried using iMovie with a Canon Vixia HF200. But couldn't get the video from the card. I maxed out my RAM to 8 GB, put in a 1TB drive and still didn't work. I did the trial of FCP and while that made importing video from the card, I'm not sold on the expense of that app just yet. (Editing in it was hard as I should have spent the $$ on a 7200 RPM drive instead of a 5400.)
The videos I'm trying to make are demos of my classical guitar performances for youtube, FB etc. The first one I did used the iSight camera with a decent mic: AKG 420. The Canon takes a nice picture but the hassle of using Handbrake and syncing audio from Garageband is just not my idea of how I can best accomplish the task for my needs. Further, the pass through allows me to have a video monitor when I'm setting the shots up by myself.
So, valued community, would you have any suggestions for a camera that might fit the

Pass Through Chapters Title

OK, I'm begging you. I searched for this problem and found it is something that others are having problems with. The answers were unintelligible.
I have a DVD menu with Pass Through. It says Greece 2007 as it scrolls.
The iMovie that I dragged is called that so that is probably how it got it's name.
On the menu there is Play Movie and Chapters.
When you click Chapters and go to that Pass Trough sub-menu it scrolls Pass Through.
I cannot get it to say anything else.
I have changed the name Chapters on the 1st menu. That didn't do it.
I have added a text box to the chapters sub-menu, still no luck.
Please let me know what I am doing wrong, I'm not an idiot but please try and be specific on your instructions.
Thanks in advance.

Michael,
I just used this theme. When you've imported your video into iDVD and chosen the Pass Through template for you DVD presentation, go to the menu bar at the top of your screen. Choose 'Advanced' and then 'Apply Theme to Project'. That should do it. You can do the same for the Chapters page.
Hope this helps
DPC

PSC 10 and Pass Through Services - Override the GO button

I have a couple of questions around the presentation of the service offer and the service form pages.
What I am trying to demonstrate for a prospective customer is a “pass-through” service where there is no order form but a link off the central PSC catalog to another website location. First off, if there is a correct way to do this please recommend it. This is what I think would be the way I would like to handle it:
     1.       Set the service to be non-orderable. This removes the “Order” and “Order on Behalf” buttons with a “Go” Button as shown here:
     2.       Next I would populate what was the HTML that describes the details of the service from the other website in the Overview from the service designer service presentation tab so that it displays in the Specification of the Offer page.
     3.       Next I would like the Go button to launch “pass-through” to the other web site. Currently it pulls up an empty form with the service description and a “Cancel” button. Is this possible?
     4.       Is there a way to control the layout of the content on the Offer Page and the Service Order Form pages? For instance, if I wanted to include the “More Details” from the service designer service presentation tab, would that be possible?

If you make the service non-orderable, but the user still has permission to see the service, he will see the service and the "Go" button. Clicking on the "Go" button is supposed to take you to the order form, which allows the end users to see the fields he/she needs to fill in, but does not have a "Submit" button.
I don't currently have a "Yes" answer for #3 and #4. There might be a way to do them. I'll look into it.

How to export PDF without recompressing all images (pass-through)

I have a simple two page document, each page has a background image linked to a perfectly sized jpg file from photoshop. Each jpg has been painstakingly optimized in photoshop. When I export to PDF, there is no passthrough option. I read in forums that setting compression to "maximum" will essentially pass-through as long as no downsampling is done. However, this is not the case.
Both jpegs are around 250KB, so I'm aiming for a pdf around 500-600KB. However, when I set "do not downsample" and compression to "none," I get an uncompressed file (70MB) essentially converting my jpegs to tiffs. When I set the compression to "maximum" I get a file that is 1.2MB. When I set the compression to "medium" I get a pdf file that is 400KB. So, this tells me the export is clearly recompressing the file no matter what setting I choose. How do I set it to not touch the images and pass-through the files? I want photoshop to do all the compression work, not indesign.
Is there anyway to achieve this?

You can see what happens if you compare an uncompressed PSD with an overly compressed jpeg placed in ID.
The two side by side in Photoshop where you can clearly see the artifacts in the jpeg:
Placed in ID the jpeg's overly compressed pixels are still visible—these are the pixels that get exported
If I export to PDF with minimum quality you can see the compression artifacts in the PSD and newly added artifacts in the jpeg:

Problem with "Pass Through Chapters" Theme

I was searching old post to get some help and this one help a little but there was still one problem unanswered. I have highlighted in red;
Nov 14, 2008 3:41 PM Re: Pass Through Theme problem
Re: Pass Through Theme problemin response to Glo H
My smaller text which appears in white says Scenes 1-6. The pass through text which is larger and has a different image in it says "Pass Through Chapters" and it rolls by while the smaller text stays put. I notice the image that shows through the pass through text is the same image I set on the main DVD screen. On that one my name of my disc roll past in giant see through letters. I like that but I just don't want that same effect on my chapters screens.
Can the image behind the rolling text be changed to the current window and not the main menu image?

Thanks for the tip and figured out to delete my "Scenes 1-6" that was automatically created when, in iMovie, I shared the movie to iDVD with chapters. The menu title text block doesn't like cut/paste and I had to retype the "Scenes 1-6" text for the motion/peek-through scrolling text to refresh.
Hmmm, but how tricky is that and where is it mentioned in the help/faq files etc?
cheers

"Returned mail: Message failed to pass through virus scanner"

We have a large number of this mail (see below) on our OCS1 cause by virus like MyDoom:
From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report;
     report-type=delivery-status; BOUNDARY="----ORCL_ES6_BOUNCE_1095724----"
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:52:32 +0200
Subject: Returned mail: Message failed to pass through virus scanner
------ORCL_ES6_BOUNCE_1095724----
Content-Type: text/plain
The original message was received at Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:51:21 +0200
from <[email protected]>
----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
<[email protected]> (unrecoverable error)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
Message failed to pass through virus scanner
------ORCL_ES6_BOUNCE_1095724----
content-type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; maildb.italtbs.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.7
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; Message failed to pass through virus scanner
------ORCL_ES6_BOUNCE_1095724----
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mailas.italtbs.com by maildb.italtbs.com
     with ESMTP id 10957241098431481; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:51:21 +0200
Received: from italtbs.com
     by mailas.italtbs.com with SMTP id i9M7pJJ06571
     for <[email protected]>; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:51:19 +0200
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Found
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:50:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
     boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_0000355F.0000439E"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
------ORCL_ES6_BOUNCE_1095724------
On MAILAS.italtbs.com are installed infrastructure, sendmail and Symantec Scan Engine.
On MAILDB.italtbs.com are installed storage database and midtier.
Can I stop this useless messagges?
Thanks and regard
Matteo

Are you still unable to send email? What client are you using? Do you see your job represented on ePrintCenter?
Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP

MIAW WindowType - preventing pass-through clicks, but non-modal?

Other than the 10 types listed in the Help files, does anyone
know about any
other window types? What I'm specifically looking for is like
a tool
palette - which floats over the stage, but if you click on
it, the clicks do
not pass through the MIAW to the stage below it. So far, the
only way I
know to do that is to make it a modal dialog box, which is
NOT what I want,
because I want to still be able to click on things on the
stage, just not if
they're directly behind the tool palette.
Alternatively, is there a way to make sure all mouse-clicks
within a MIAW do
NOT pass through to the stage behind it? I'm using type 4,
"Movable window
without size box or zoom box", which seems to be the closest
one to what I
want, but I need to stop those pass-through clicks from
messing up the
stage...

"Darrel Hoffman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The point of checking for MouseDown inside a MouseWithin
handler is
> that you can click and "paint" tiles over any number of
sprites,
> without having to release the mouse button and click
each sprite
> individually. If I put everything into MouseUp/MouseDown
handlers,
> then you'd have to click each sprite one by one in order
to change
> the tiles, which is incredibly tedious compared the
smooth
> click-and-drag method I'm using.
>
> As I've said, checking to see if the mouse is within the
rect of the
> MIAW *does* prevent clickthroughs. In other words, I do
have a
> working solution to my problem. I just still think it's
far more
> code than should be necessary to do what should by all
rights happen
> by default, especially since I have to incorporate this
same code
> into several different mouse events in a bunch of
different
> behaviors. (It will be even worse if I at some point
decide to have
> more than one tool palette MIAW up at the same time for
some reason,
> since I'd have to check for each of them, and then check
*within*
> each of them as well in case they overlap eachother...)
>
> We kind of got sidetracked with the whole idea of a
moving sprite
> underneath the MIAW to catch stray mouse events - a
technique which
> doesn't work 100% because moving the MIAW causes a stray
mouse-click
> when you release it.
>
> I just wish there were some default setting for MIAW's
which
> prevented clickthroughs automatically. It's pretty much
an
> aesthetic thing now, since I have a working solution,
but I don't
> like ugly code (even if nobody but me will ever see it),
and I wish
> there was a better way to do it. Just seems like it
should be the
> default behavior. Think of any other program you've
seen. Indeed,
> since we all know Director, think of that. Say you've
got the Score
> window and the Cast window and the Script window and
> who-knows-what-else all open at once, and they're all
overlapping on
> your screen. When you click on one, only the one on top
responds.
> This is what you expect when you click on something in
any program.
> You'd run into all kinds of problems if the ones
underneath also
> responded to your clicks (or any other mouse events for
that
> matter). This is basically the same thing I'm trying to
do with my
> little tool palette, but it seems you have to write a
whole bunch of
> scripts just to make that happen? That just doesn't seem
right to
> me.
>
> Anyhow, thanks for your suggestions everyone. And if
anyone knows a
> way to make MIAW's do this automatically, please let me
know.
Darrel,
out of all the possible ways to do what you want, you have
probably
picked the worse.
Now you run into trouble, of course.
First:
Read up on the way events are processed in Director, and
passed or not
passed from object to object.
Second:
Did you actually READ what I wrote? You just keep repeating
the same
things that dont make sense...
The mouseDown event is not the problem, the problem is that
you check
for a mouseDown STATE, not handle a mouseDown EVENT.
You can change your code easily to provide for this and have
the same
result.
Third:
When mouseClicks are somehow not intercepted in the MIAW,
then handle
them yourself in the MIAW.
I agree with Mike that it is your approach to the problem
that creates
this complexity.
If you stick to handling events in the way Director gives
them to you,
you will not have those strange things.
good luck,
Richad.

McAfee EEMAC Login pass through

Our Security team at my company wants to install McAfee's Endpoint Encryption on our Mac laptops. Our Macs are bound into AD and end users login with a user ID and password.
McAfee's Endpoint Encryption login modifies the boot process so that the user logs into McAfee first (AD user ID and password) and then gets to the Mac login screen. I'm wondering if anyone else has a similar configuration, but has developed a login hook to pass through the McAfee user authentication to the Mac's login so the end user only has to login one time.
Any advice is appreciated... thanks!

Two problems with trying that:
a) Not an available option If Iopen the control panel I see eight options: System & Security, Neytwork & Internet, Harware & Sound, Program, User Accounts and Family Safety, Appearance and Personalization, Clock, Language, and Region, and Ease of Access. No "Change Bionmetric Settings".
This Winodws 7 Pro 64 bit
b) I could have done more on introduction but didn't see the need. While these little computers aren't THAT familiar to me I am retired from decades in the cypher mines in the world of large mainframes. So Iknow SOMETHING about the problem. When Windows is booting up it will start a number of tasks (services) ending with the one that will prodiuce the log in screen. Or in this case, two such routines, one first dsplaying the fingerprint log in screen, then, after a few seconds, running another routine that brings up the normal password sign in screen. At least, that's what happens wen it doesn't "stall" .
I am asking if anybody can tell me how I turn off the first. It isn't clear that turing off the device that this first routine is trying to access wouldn't make things even worse (unclear that disabling thdevice would remove the routine from the liust of things Windows does when coming up -- perhaps the "stall" is even relted to it not getting a "ready" response form the fingerprint reader).
I am new to Windows7. If still under Windows XP I know there is something that I run that brings up the "things to do while starting up" where you can check or uncheck things (I'd have to find my notes to give more details) but I don't know what that would be under Windows 7 nor, if I got there, the name of the "fingerprint log in" routine to uncheck nor the name of the routine to check that devices without a fingerprint reader would use.
PROBLEM STILL OPEN

Still puzzled by RF pass through

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for