Still somewhat confused over Ram usage..

I've been looking through old posts and not finding an answer, but forgive me if I missed it somewhere.  I have a system that, when finished, will control multiple machines via webserver (Each machine has its own unique VI).  I know that 8.6.1 is limited to 4GB of Ram, but is that in total, or per VI instance?  I have a budget for buying computers, and I have to decide between one very powerful machine using intels new cpu and 16GB ram, or several cheaper boxes with PhenomX4's and 4GB ram.  One machine would stop a lot of headaches for me, but if there is some kind of hard 4GB limit maybe the other way will be more efficient.  Thanks for any help!

Do you have LabVIEW 64bit on 64bit Windows?
If your OS is 32 bit, the overall total is 2-3GB.
See also this link for details.
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Similar Messages

  • Still confused over fup changes to Total BB option...

    There still seems to be confusion over the planned changes for Total BB Option 1 customers.
    Although KerryG has informed us that the monthly allowance will remain at 10Gb and the charge for additional use will be changing to £5 per 5Gb, BT customer services seem to think the extra usage charge remains the same as it is now.
    Please see posts from KerryG and bobm here -
    http://community.bt.com/t5/BB-in-Home/WHERE-IS-OUR​-USAGE-MONITOR-BT/m-p/41085#M24680
    Does anyone have any further info please ?

    Hi Del
    I can confirm that the info I provided on the earlier thread was correct.  I am sorry if people have received other information when calling in.  I have fed this back to the relevant teams to make sure all advisors are aware of these recent changes. 
    To clarify, the position for BT Total Broadband Option 1 is:
    Usage allowance – will remain at 10GB
    Additional usage charges – they will be charged at 5GB for £5 (rather than 1GB for £1) as from November 1st 2010.
    As mentioned before, there are a couple of links that may be useful for those who think they may be likely to incur additional usage charges and wish to review which broadband option is best for them:
    Details of usage allowances for each option
    Details of options for upgrading your broadband package
    Thx
    Kerry
    Retired BTCare Community Manager - StephanieG and SeanD are your new Community Managers
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Firefox 4.0 RAM usage soars over time in Mac OSX 10.6.7 and is never freed

    Firefox 4.0 RAM usage typically averages between 400-750MB for light usage (1-2 windows, 1-3 tabs each). Memory usage skyrockets over time, and/or if I open more tabs or windows where I've seen it consume well over 1 GB of RAM of my total 4 GB. Firefox 4.0 never seems to free much of this RAM relative to what it's consuming either.
    The only plugins enabled are QuickTime, Flash and Java (and disabling any of these to use Firefox efficiently should not be required).
    The worst I've ever seen was it using 1.27 GB of RAM when all I had open was Facebook (1 window, 0 tabs). Something is not right with this browser...Shouldn't it free what it isn't using?

    Same here. I upgraded to FF5 yesterday morning and by this morning FF was using 1.26GB RAM and over 1GB Virtual Memory (less than 24 hours). I've had this problem ever since I started using FF with version 3...
    The only add-on I use is Firebug.

  • Runaway RAM Usage leading to Kernel Panic using FilmConvert Plugin (updated x3)

    Hello, filed a bug report on this but cuious if anyone sees it.
    Late 2012 27 iMac, top line i7 with 680MX, 32 GB RAM.
    Promise R6 TB RAID.
    Trying to render out a 15 min edit from Premiere that has each clip with 3 filters on it - MB Looks, MB Colorista, Filmconvert.
    Since 7.01, every time I render previews or encode out, RAM use skyrockets way past the 25GB I allocated. I get up to a 50GB swap file in fact before the computer just craps out and I can't finish my render. (Nothing past 15 min anyway, I can do under that length ok.) As of this moment PPro Headless in Activity Monior has allocated 40GB and climbing....
    Any ideas?  Kind of a major issue. Does not happen on CS6 with same filters and similar project.
    PS - The same issue is happening with the same project on my Macbook Pro 15" retina with 16GB of RAM. It's creating a huge swap file. On the iMac with Fusion drive I can't complete the render at all due to the system SSD filling up on the Fusion drive. It eventually crashes and reboots. I can complete the render on the laptop, but it ends up with a 50+ GB swap file.
    UPDATE 1:
    I had my suspicions a Plugin I am using, the excellent (but now unusable for over 10 min projects) plugin "FilmConvert" was causing the issue on all my Macs.
    To prove it's the plugin, I removed duplicated my main 15 min sequence, removed the FilmConvert plugin from all clips while keeping the two Magic Bullet effects on. So, all filters (MB Looks, MB Colorista II) BUT filmConvert.
    Result?
    RAM usage stays where it should be (at the limit set in Premiere Pro CC) and there is zero swap file usage. Same project, same filters, same everything except FilmConvert was removed on this duplicate timeline.
    As it stands, the plugin is unusable for longer projects.  I'm still curious if anyone else has seen this, or if Adobe has any input.
    UPDATE 2: I developed a workaround workflow and the vendor wrote back and thinks it's a bug in PPro CC, but will try to see if they can't code around it:
    "We have had one other very recent report of this type of behaviour, but when rendering through the CC version
    of Adobe Media Encoder or Premiere (but not After Effects). I believe the issue is with Media Encoder / Premiere,
    although it's probably preventable within our plugin. The problem I believe is that Premiere and Media Encoder
    create many instances of the plugin during a  render, one instance per frame, and it seems in CC those instances
    do not get cleaned up until after the render finishes.
    As each plugin instance is expecting to be called many times, to render multiple frames, it keeps a certain amount
    of memory allocated, in order to gain a speed advantage."
    I am using the render previews workflow to deal with it for now. I set my sequence to my master codec (in this case ProRes 422 HQ, with maximum quality checked). Then I preview chunks of the timeline setting in/out, render. Then I quit the program, which frees up the RAM and the need for the swap file, which starts reducing itself. Then I run PPro again, and preview another chunk, and repeat the process until done.
    To export final piece, I just export using previews matching the sequence (which is ProRes 422 HQ) and it is a straight copy at that point and quick. This is a useful workflow if you are making tons of minor edits for a client anyway, as it vastly speeds up re-renders of the final file.  No loss in quality as the previews are the same as my final encode would be anyway.
    Still, it would be nice if Adobe/FilmConvert or both could fix this bug so I can just queue up a whole sequence and walk away without chunking it up if I need to.
    Update 3: If only Adobe could move so fast. Rubber Monkey sent me a new version to test today, and it fixed the problem. Amazing customer service!! It has not been released yet but I suspect it will be at some point. Case closed.

    Glad I'm not the only one. My temporary solution was to download the kernel and wl package from December 2012 found http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/ and then mkpkg and install it. It'll work as an alternative for now, without messing up the primary kernel setup.

  • Is there any way to 'recover' RAM usage (other than restarting)?

    Hi everyone,
    I just upgraded my White Macbook 4,1 to 4GB of RAM and when I first boot the system, Activity Monitor shows that over 3GB is free.
    After several hours of usage (Mail, Safari 4 Beta, iTunes, iCal, iPhoto, Time Machine, Address Book, and yes...Activity Monitor!) it shows just over 2GB free.
    Now the part that puzzles me is that even after quitting all these applications, the RAM usage does recover somewhat, but never reaches it's original >3GB of availability.
    A reboot certainly does the job. But is there any other way that Leopard can recover this memory? Is this normal? If I simply leave the system idle for some time without any open applications will Leopard eventually reclaim the lost memory?
    Thanks!
    Message was edited by: Michael271

    There's no need for any "ram" recovery. It's all handled by the memory manager. You must be coming from the world of XP. See the following:
    About OS X Memory Management and Usage
    Reading system memory usage in Activity Monitor
    Memory Management in Mac OS X
    Performance Guidelines- Memory Management in Mac OS X
    A detailed look at memory usage in OS X
    Understanding top output in the Terminal
    The amount of available RAM for applications is the sum of Free RAM and Inactive RAM. This will change as applications are opened and closed or change from active to inactive status. The Swap figure represents an estimate of the total amount of swap space required for VM if used, but does not necessarily indicate the actual size of the existing swap file. If you are really in need of more RAM that would be indicated by how frequently the system uses VM. If you open the Terminal and run the top command at the prompt you will find information reported on Pageins () and Pageouts (). Pageouts () is the important figure. If the value in the parentheses is 0 (zero) then OS X is not making instantaneous use of VM which means you have adequate physical RAM for the system with the applications you have loaded. If the figure in parentheses is running positive and your hard drive is constantly being used (thrashing) then you need more physical RAM.

  • Lightroom LR4 - Silly RAM usage!!

    Lightroom LR4 - Silly RAM usage!!
    Edit Subject
    Lightroom LR4 - Silly RAM usage!!
    Hi there
    I'm stunned at the amount of RAM usage by LIghtroom. I have 6Gb of RAM using LR4 in 64 bit win7.
    This is what happened when I opened lightroom to edit a shoot of jpgs, all of which were only about 3mb each ( I wasn't even editing 30Mb RAW files from my DSLRs )
    [i]figures from task manager/performance pane[/i]:
    No Lightroom
    0.99 GB
    Launch Lightroom and cat
    1.53 GB
    select next pic
    2.00 Gb
    select next pic (no editing yet )
    2.20 GB
    after editing two pics
    3.13 GB
    editing the 2nd pic in Nik Software Silver Efex pro 2 ( edit copy with lightroom adjustments ) and returning to lightroom
    2.85 GB
    but ....
    Very soon, after only a few pics, the RAM usage is up to 5.5GB
    This seems very disproportionate. Why for example would simply selecting another 3mb jpg eat up another 200Mb of RAM? And why after only a bit of editing on this 3mb pic in the develop module eat up another 900Mb of RAM?
    The other highly annoying issue is that once Lightroom has decided to eat up nearly all my available RAM after editing only a few 3mb JPGs, things slow down rapidly. selecting another pic means everything locks up while their is vicious disk activity ( presumably swapping to swap file because Lightroom needs another 200Mb of ram for just one 3mb JPG )
    it's not much fun having to quit LR every few images just to 'reset' thje amount of RAM.

    OK, seem to be getting somewhere now
    As stated in the OP I work in 64 bit Win 7. I have a win 7 32 bitpartition on the same machine I use for various things and also for testing Lightroom updates without upsetting my main LR work partition.
    Earlier tonight I isntalled 4.1RC2 on my win 7 32 bit partition and ahve been working on a shoot. Interestingly the RAN usage seems much better managed. Instead of progressviely creeping up to a point of ARRGHHH!!!, with RC2 memory is released when switching images. Great news!!   Now bearing mind I still need to stest this in my 64 bit martition and I will isntall RC2 once confident it wont' fall right over, but positive os far.
    ALSO, which I've just started testing is the negative cache disablement as described by Adfoibe Employee  Julie Kmoch here
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lr4_0_reacts_extremely_slow
    who said:
    Here's an update on what changed in RC2 relative to Develop performance.
    For starters, in RC1 we experimented with turning off sharpening while sliders were moving. We got a fair amount of negative feedback on that, and have reverted that behavior. Instead, we moved more of the rendering to a background thread, which keeps the sliders moving smoothly. One caveat with the behavior in RC2 is that those background renders can pile up if you're moving fast. The final 4.1 release will do a better job of trimming these when possible.
    I worked with a number of you who volunteered to try an experiment a couple weeks ago that turned off something we call negative caching. The results were mixed; a couple people said it was a clear improvement, others didn't see a benefit. But I'll offer it here in case it helps others who find performance starts out reasonably then suddenly, consistently goes south until a restart.
    What the following will do is turn off a cache which saves some of your most recent work done in Develop such that if you revisit a recently touched image, it loads faster. However, if our calculations are off, this cache can sometimes get too big and cause ACR to use virtual memory instead of RAM.
    To try it:
    1. Create a text file called “config.lua” and put the following line in it: AgNegativeCache.enabled = false
    2. Launch Lightroom, go to the Preferences dialog, Presets tab, and hit “Show Lightroom Presets Folder”.
    3. Close the Preferences dialog, quit Lightroom.
    4. Drop the attached config.lua file into the Lightroom folder that was opened in step 2 (do not put it in one of the preset subfolders). So the path to the file will look like this:
    Mac: /Users/[yourname]/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Lightroom/config.lua
    Win:  C:\Users\[yourname]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Lightroom\config.lua
    You’ll know this switch to turn the cache off is working if you see the “Loading...” symbol even when you revisit the previously edited image in Develop. (When caching is on, you can often revisit a recently edited photo without the Loading warning showing.)
    I'll report back laters

  • OSX Lion ram usage

    Well, i've got my 13' Macbook Air today (4gb ram), and love it.
    The only thing that bothers me is the extremely high ram usage of Lion, when i turn the Macbook on it jumps to about 1.3gb ram usage which i find really much considering my PC running Windows 7 uses less.
    After some casual usage it even jumps up to about 2 gb ram usage.
    Is this normal? how are the other Air's with only 2gb of ram handling this? there can't be much left there, besides just running the operating system.
    i am new to Mac's so am i doing something wrong?

    Hi all,
    After last Lion update a i seem to encounter a very strange situation regarding ram usage.
    I have an early 13' mbp core i5 with 8gb of ram.
    After upgrading to lion 10.7.1 i have less than 500mb available after just a few hours since i turn it on.
    I must mention that the only running apps are: safari, mail, app store, ichat, ms excell and itunes.
    Upon quitting excell, itunes, appstore and restarting mail and safari i still only get 1,5gb of free ram.
    My suspicion is that there is another ram leak somewhere, or else i can't explain why my computer user 128mb of swap with 8gb of ram installed.

  • [T410i] RAM usage, hight temperature, battery

    Hi all, in this pc I've got two OSs. Ubuntu 12.04 and windows 7. With the fist I haven't got any problems, the RAM (3GB) usage is usually around 33%, but always under 50%. The temperatures are high, but it is quite normal, maybe the termal paste has low power to cold down them.
    The problems arrive with windows 7. I disabled a lot of startup application, but after the boot, RAM usage is already over 50%. With Avira-realtime, after 2 minutes the percentage was over 80%. I disabled it.
    Mozilla used a lot of memory too, now I'm just writing this post with chrome and nothing else, and the RAM usage is at 72%. 
    The CPU temperatures are always over 48°C (Here in Italy it is summer) but with ubuntu are less.
    These problems are increased with battery, It is impossible to use the pc. I did a scan with malwarebytes (in safe mode) and everything seemed ok. How can I solve at least the RAM problem in win 7?
    Regards

    peets wrote:If you have a lot of memory, why not make use of it? I'm assuming this is a home/desktop computer. It's nice to have features like  caching of web pages, music, etc. or fancy 3D effects, if it doesn't slow down your regular use. I use up lots of RAM to speed up my daily computer use.
    256 MB of ram. I too enjoy a featurefull desktop, but speed is equally imperative. e17 gives you something of both worlds.
    quick question. It seems the only thing I really need from my xorg.conf is the keyboard configuration as it figures out the rest pretty well without a configuration file. Could I delete everything else from xorg.conf and have it autoconfigure the rest?

  • Ever increaing RAM usage of flashPlayer not shown in memory profiler of FlashBuilder

    I have a flash application created with Flex in FlashBuilder which uses the Stage3D-API (Away3D-Library is used).
    In this flash application 3D-objects are created and added to scene and they are also removed/disposed again, and then they are created/added again.
    Performing these scene altering operations the RAM usage of the flashPlayer process (monitored in Windows7-Taskmanager) steadily increases by big amounts (lets say 20MB).
    On the other hand the Memory-profiler does not show any such increases at all. Regarding to memory profiler the application still uses bascially the same amount of memory (the line stays flat).
    There are some objects marked as loitering, but  they donet seem to build-up. And their total amount is (if at all) 0,3MB.
    After a while of 3d-scene altering operations (adding, removeing objects) the application/flash-player crashes, most possibly to not being able to allocate more RAM (Taskmanager shows RAM almost completely used up by flashPlayer-process). The application does not exit due to 3d-resource related limits like vertex-buffers, but here are now my questions:
    Questions:
    a) Are there areas of RAM-usages a (stage-3d) application uses up, which can not be profiled by FlashBuilder?
    For exmaple: Is it possible that some objects (maybe stage-3d related) that hold onto some areas of memory/RAM which do not show up in memory profiler?
    c) Is the versioning of used components (flashPlayer, FlashBuilder or used Flex-SDK) in an way relevant when memory profiling an application? It it possible that i dont properly see the used memory by my application because i might have old version of involved components?
    d) Do you have any other idea what might be the cause here for increased RAM-usage or why it does not show up in memory profiler? I mean at least i expected to see it in memory profiler.
    e) Generally i understand that the flashPlayer allocates RAM as it sees fit, and that its not the same amount of memory my application currently uses. But if my application seems not to use/demand any more memory (at least thats what the profiler tells me) i dont understand why flashPlayer allocates more and more memory - even to the point of crashing. Any ideas here?

    Long shot but...
    When I had an issue with Flash Builder 4.6 PC mobile in regards to the java heap problem I discovered myself that my project had content which apparently blew out the FB threshold. In particular my mp3 files (3 units) were of too much high quality (360 kbps), I had to scale down the files to 128 kbps. This is an extreme shame.
    I am currently running these threshold tests to see if my mp3s can be of better kbps. I did hack my CONFIG scripts in the sdk folders in the installation location but that did not solve my issue. LESSON LEARNED: FB apparently employs the web logic where reduced files equal better performance.

  • RAM usage by Adobe Flash Player spikes when playing online flash games with 3D graphics

    Hi. I have recently noticed a spike in RAM usage by my flash player plug-in whenever I play online flash games that use a 3D graphics engine (for example, Farmville 2 and Chefville by Zynga). Apart from the numerous times I receive an error message that the plug-in has failed, my RAM usage goes above 70% from the regular 40% with the plug-in consuming more than 1Gb. I have experienced the problem with the updated version of Adobe Flash Player on the newest releases of Firefox, Chrome and RockMelt. This spike in usage usually leads to a crash of my GPU (ATI Mobility Rabeon 4650 - 2Gb) My specs are as follows:
    OS - Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
    Processor - Core i5
    Speed - 2.27 GHz
    RAM - 4.00Gb (3.86 Gb usable)
    HDD - 500 Gb (465 Gb usable)
    I should also note that the required specifications for the latest version of Flash Player (11.7.700.202) requires processing speeds of 2.33Ghz. Could that be the issue? I am still to attempt downgrading of my Flash version to see if that could help reduce the RAM usage. Are there any other suggestions out there?

    Hmmm... Win 7 will run faster than Mavericks with 8Gb. Even my Vm of 7 runs faster once I get it past all the startup processes.
    It may or may not be a connectivity problen since Windows uses a different protocol, even though it's on the same hardware. Usually though, what affects OS X will affect BootCamp too.
    What browser?

  • RAM usage

    Hi everybody,
    first of all, regardless that problem isn´t solved yet, thanks very much to Todd for his very detailed problem descriptions. It´s very interesting to understand how AE is handling the memory, with this in mind, it´s way more better to search for the problem´s origin.
    After still getting this and other memory based errors, I downloaded FreeRAMBosster and checked the RAM usage during working on my project.
    After opening the project, there are 17 GB left of 24 GB. Prerendering 4 - 5 seconds causes the free RAM to go down to 8 MEGABYTE.
    The thing is, one, why is that, and two, why won´t I get more free RAM again even after purging everything possible? The system only releases RAM after I shut down AE.
    Currently I´m working on
    Mac Pro
    2 x 2,4 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    24 GB 1066 MHz DDR3
    After Effects 12.0.0.404
    AE got 21 GB RAM for use, other apps got 3 GB.
    Multiprocessing is OFF.
    Preview resolution is set down to every 16 px.
    Ok, I´ve got an Illustrator document with 40 layers in it which is the basis for the AE project. Maybe this causes the RAM to go down to the ground. But I do not understand why there is no RAM reset in any stage of currently working on a project. Because you won´t have fun during processing, and final rendering is absolutely impossible.
    Thanks for any further input on this.

    Hi Todd and everyone landed here because of the same issues,
    I just figured it out.
    Todd, I didn´t do the update because I wanted to test something first. The problem got something to do with the file link between After Effects and Illustrator. Or maybe it´s just really physically happening that the RAM was overflooded.
    My whole project was based on one single Illustrator document with mutliple layers (ca. 40). I just split it up now scene by scene (f. e. 4 scenes = 4 Illustrator documents with multiple layers within) and relinked the footage in AE to that new documents.
    That did the job!!! AE just got through it like a hot knife through butter.
    A side effect of that was that there were continiously 4 - 5 GB RAM free, so the rendering process was just flowing.
    What I´m still interested in Todd is if there is any RAM reset during working on a project at some stage. I´m finished rendering now and have 3 GB RAM left.

  • Gathering CPU/RAM usage?

    Hello everyone, I'm fairly new to Java but have a decent amount of C experience. I'm trying to build somewhat of a very low level monitoring tool in Java, but can't find out the simplest way to get current CPU/RAM usage. I've ran into many references to the Java Management Extensions (JMX), but can't find any basic documentation on any functions that might help me out.
    If anyone can point me in the right direction on how to gather the CPU/RAM usage I will be very grateful, thanks for your time.

    Theres no way to get this through the "MBeans"?
    Taken from this URL:
    http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/jconsole.html#OSResources
    "The JDK 5.0 extends the Operating System MBean to include certain OS resource information such as:
    * the process CPU time
    * the amount of total and free physical memory"
    Doesn't that mean theres some way to directly get (at least) the RAM usage without having to write platform specific JNI code? Or am I missing something?

  • How to reduce ram usage in firefox to bring its memory footprint as close to navigator's as possible .

    So yes , I still use navigator and for my awesome albeit not too powerful laptop , it is a godsend , never going beyond 200 MB on the ram usage . But the tinkerer in me wants to know if its possible to fiddle around in firefox and make it as light as navigator cuz lets face it , firefox may be good but 900MB ram usage is just too much .

    I am trying to close some unnecessary program
    To see more available memory, you need to get in the habit of QUIT-ing unnecessary Applications. If you simply close their windows, they stay active in the background, waiting to be re-activated.
    Mavericks and later use RAM Memory differently, and it is expected behavior to see all memory in use. Use the Activity Monitor > Memory display to check your memory pressure. Green is good.

  • [SOLVED] Arch64 high RAM usage...

    I recently installed Arch64 on my MacBook and everything works fine, however I noticed its using very much RAM in comparison to my 32 bit workstation system (which has 4GB, not all seen o/c in 32 bit, while my laptop has only 2GB). Right now, with only X, musca, firefox and 3 urxvt terms open its using about 25% of it. which comes down to about 500MB. I didn't mind that much until just now I've seen it going up to 64% after I've launched matlab and it remained at this number after I closed it. My system is still responsive and fast, but I'm afraid I'm running out of RAM quite fast this way...thus if this cannot be explained or fixed I'm forced to go back to Arch32.
    Is anybody else experiencing this ? I'm running kernel version 2.6.33.4-1 btw, and xorg 1.7.6-3.
    Last edited by geniuz (2010-05-18 21:32:40)

    Unused RAM is wasted RAM.
    And firefox is KNOWN to be a memory grubby hog.
    Let the kernel do it's job. Unless you are specifically having issues(100% ram usages and high swap usage) there is little to worry about.
    Also relating to Arch32 v Arch64.64 has a larger memory address(64 against 32) apps will use more RAM.
    free -m
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 2009 1588 420 0 67 601
    -/+ buffers/cache: 920 1088
    Last edited by jwwolf (2010-05-18 20:48:02)

  • Scratch disks and RAM usage

    i would like to understand the relationship between scratch disks and RAM usage in Photoshop.
    While i was working on a fairly big psb file (2gb), photoshop kept prompting that I was out of memory, but in fact the utilization was only 75% (i had 16gbs total, photoshop was only using 7gb, and i allowed PS to use up to 14gb in total). when it says out of memory, it was actually my scratch disk at fault ( i only set 1 scratch disk, which was my 120gb SSD running out of space).
    any idea how I can optimize PS to use up all my RAM first before even touching my scratch disk? (short of using a RAMdisk, please).
    thanks!

    I am curious about this also. I just reinstalled W-7--have 11 G of physical memory--a ton of hard drive empty space also, and I have been wondering why PS_CC is so slow--since basically I have only put my Security and Browser in addition to Adobe back on the Dell XPS computer..... At least now it does show the downloading percentage (like .psd file) , but that must be what is happening.  I do think that some of these "frozen" screens I have been experiencing, was because the program was using scratch disk, instead of the Ram... I came up from CS-5, and can't describe it in detail, but just realize how slow PS-CC is in most everything.  Going back and see if reallocating will help...

Maybe you are looking for