STMS Transport Route Administration - Import Targets not modifiable.

Hello. I'm trying to configure cCTS for use with CHARM. I have created my system clusters and defined a consolidation and delivery route for the clusters. Now when I double click on my clusters in edit mode and navigate to the Import Targets tab, I am not able to modify this tab. I have been following the cCTS for CHARM and QGM Configuration guide.

Thanks Jessica
I'm also working with OSS SAP Support now to try and resolve my issue.
In short I can some up the problem and testing completed so far.
To Start:
The Server group removed old QA server from our SAP Landscape, therefore STMS Transport Route required rebuilding.
Systems:
We have a very complex system setup with SAP R3, CRM and BW systems. Each system has it's own server (Dev = R3D, CRD & BWD, QA Testing is now = R3T, CRT & BWT, Production = R3P, CRP & BWP) The Original QA servers are now being removed (R3Q, CRQ & BWQ)
CRD is the Transport Domain Controller, with transport bins located on CRD for R3D & BWD, CRT for R3T & BWT and CRP for R3P & BWP. (Firewalls and Server locations are the root cause for the different Trans Directories)
Transport route:
Transport route for SAP R3 was: R3D -> R3Q -> R3T & R3P (in a delivery group). The new Transport Route needs to be R3D -> R3T -> R3P.
Main Problem now: With the Transport Route configured like R3D -> R3T -> R3P, any new transport requests created in R3D moves to the R3T Import Queue automatically when the transport is released. Once the transport is successfully imported into R3T, it should automatically be added to the R3P Import Queue, but does not.
Present work around: I've reconfigured the Transport route to R3D -> R3T & R3P. Any tranport request once released, is successfully added to both the R3T & R3P Import Queues.
I have checked all SAPService<sid> OS users and passwords, ensured that the TMSADM user was recreated and working on each of the systems, used telnet to log onto each of the servers from each of the other servers at the OS level (to ensure it's not a landscape firewall security issue), I've also checked all RFC connections in the same manner (to ensure each system can reach the others), recreated the route from R3T to R3P as both a Consolidation and a Delivery type of route,
I will post any resolution found later.
Thanks for the help anyway

Similar Messages

STMS TRANSPORT ROUTES VIEW

Hi,
Can somebody know how we can save transport routes view in stms to file (visio for exemple) ? thanks in advance.
Regards
Sidi

Hi,
I have access to sevral landscapes and same problem and regarding your propositions:
1/ System>List........>local file not available on yhis view
2/custo of local setting no results
3/print screen will not print all the view and even will no allow to modify the out put
For visio was juste example if i can have it on world also will solve the problem.
Regards
Sidi

STMS - Transport Routes - Multiple Clients and Systems

Hi Guys
We are setting up a ERP Landscape based in four systems
AED - Gold Development (Most Development starts from here)
AEC - Customer Development (101,102,103...)
AEQ - Customer QA (401,402,403,...)
AEP - QA Production (701,702,703,...)
Our main goal is to release transports from AED 100 to all clients in AEC (101,102,103...)
CTC was already set up to 1, and all system share a same Trans Dir
For this purpose I have created a transport Group /SOD_DEV/ and added AEC 101, 102 and new clients would be added
Only customizing request should be replicated on each client, and workbench only for one client.
Then, I need also all the transports from AEC go their respective client transport queue in AEQ and AEP
Example:
AEC 101 --> AEQ 401 --> AEP 701
AEC 102 --> AEQ 402 --> AEP 702
And in the future it should be able to expand to
AEC 103 --> AEQ 403 --> AEP 703 and go on.
My questions are:
Should I create a Transport Group for Customizing and Transport Layer for Workbench? O can I use a single Tranport Layer for both Workbench/Customizing?
How can i create a route from AEC so transports who got imported in 101 are automatically delivered to 401 and then 701?
Thanks
Martin

Hi Yuksel, thanks for your input.
We agree with a tranport Group between AED and AEC. Transport layer is ZAED.
All developments made in AED, are distributed to Transport Group /SOD/ to all AEC clients (100,101,102...)
Now comes the tricky part
for example, all requests that were imported in AEC 101 should be delivered to AEQ 401 and then delivered to AEP 701 only
That why I didn't put a transport group between AEC and AEQ, since it should be a dependency.
Any transport that was imported on AEC should follow their respective route
Workbench: AEC 100 --> AEQ 400 --> AEP 700 (Sytem-Wide Workbench requests)
Client 1: AEC 101 --> AEQ 401 --> AEP 701 (Client-Dependent Customizing)
Client 2 :AEC 102 --> AEQ 402 --> AEP 702 (Client-Dependent Customizing)
And it wiil follow with
Client 3 AEC 103 --> AEQ 403 --> AEP 703 (Client-Dependent Customizing)
It created these delivery routes; as example for Client1: AED101-AEQ401 and AEQ401-AEP701. Is that correct?
See attached the screenshot for better reference, you are welcome to further suggestions
Best
Martin

STMS-Transport Routes creattion

Hi Friends,
Please clarify my question regarding transport routes. We had total 4 systems in our landscpae like ECC-dev,Qas,Trn and PRD.
as usually the old transport connections are existed beteen "dev-qas" then "qas to trn" and "prd".Now we want to create new
transport route between dev to TRN directly due to new functional developement. I don't want to touch eixted connections
because these new transport route is temporary only. If I create this transport path between dev and trn, is there any impact to
existed connections? How can I create this path, Please advice on this .
Thanks.

Hi,
I don't think you can add same system twice in transport routes.
And if you want to change existing one, check below link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/b4a2a27acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Thanks
Sunny

Import steps not specific to Transport Request

Hi all,
I need to move 5 Released Transport Request as "Local Change Requests" to another SAP installation.
I followed two guides to do this:
SAP BASIS / ABAP - How to Export and Import an External Change Request - YouTube
How to copy Repository Objects between non-connected SAP systems - ABAP Development - SCN Wiki
However I have problems creating the Change Request that contains all my requests: if I generate it as Local Change Request it is not available on cofiles and data folders.
So I created a new Virtual System called M02 and I created a standard consolidation transport link between my original system M01 and the virtual system M02.
Then I created a new TRANSPORT OF COPIES Transport Request and I selected as target system M02. All objects are correctly added to the new request and the validation is correctly performed.
However when I release the request on the SOURCE server I get the following error:
M01#######            My Request Name
M01        System M01
             Checks at Operating System Level         05.03.2014 16:48:34    (0) Successfully Completed
             Pre-Export Methods                       05.03.2014 16:48:37    (0) Successfully Completed
             Export                                   05.03.2014 16:48:47    (0) Successfully Completed
      Import steps not specific to transport request
M02        Virtual System
             Selection for Import                     05.03.2014 16:48:47    (0) Successfully Completed
      Import steps not specific to transport request
"Import steps not specific to transport request" expanded as:
Feedback after export or import 05.03.2014 16:48:48    (0) Successfully Completed
I get this message even if I generate the new Change Request from a single Change Request (the first one that we released).
The cofiles and data files are correctly generated, however the IMPORT on the TARGET server returns an error (invalid data package)
My question is: is the "Import steps not specific to transport request" message correct, or should I modify something? Why am I getting this message?
Thank you

Hi Chinna,
Its a warning message you can ignore that... if you want to see what exactly the reason for warning in SE09 --> select the released request --> click the Transport Log Ikon --> select the warning message and click the spects Ikon --> go on expanding you can find the warnings of Objects in Yellow...
Hope this helps,
Sudhakar.

Is transport route necessary to make tp show up at STMS buffer?

Good morning:
We added a real extra system as this: dev->qa->prod->"extra system".
There is a delivery route (NOT transport route) between prod->"extra system".
However, the transport imported into prod
1) shows up in "extra system"'s buffer at OS level (i.e. using "tp showbuffer ...);
2) does NOT show up at STMS "extra system"'s buffer (i.e. NO show at GUI level).
Is a transport route absolutely necessary between "prod->extra system" in order to correct this?
Thanks!

Hi,
Ok, but regarding 1st point, do the system belong to the same transport group? If these share the same transport directory they should. You can check the transport group in STMS-> System Overview.
Also perform the following checks in STMS -> System Overview:
Select all the systems, then:
SAP system > Check > Perform the three checks there.
Do you see any error?
Br,
Javier

Transport Routes STMS

I have EHP4 running on two different machines on same network. Each one has different host name, SID and instance number. I am not able to join them and create transport routes. In STMS I am choosing u201CExternal Systemsu201D!!!. I am not sure what I am missing in parameters. Please Help.

Hi,
In your case you can't have this bu as for the information External system is combine if real and virtual system where you can save and distribute among other system, Virtual - consider a scenario (Implementation stage) where you have only 1 system physically available ex, DEV but in future you have to build up QAS, PRD and more so here you can add your virtual QAS, PRD, Domain links are used when you have multiple Domains available - Need expert advice on this as I have only theoretically aware of this
Regards,
Salim

BOM and Routing import is not populating data in base table.

BOM AND ROUTING INTERFACE Import Prog is not populating base table with interface data.Even the Interface table data is not processed.I am passing process flag as 1 and transaction_type as INSERT,still the ROUTING INTERFACE TABLES are not getting processed.
passing the below details.
INSERT INTO bom.bom_op_routings_interface
        (organization_code,          assembly_item_id,          completion_subinventory,         routing_sequence_id,          organization_id,
         routing_type,          common_routing_sequence_id,          last_update_date,          last_updated_by,          creation_date,
         created_by,         last_update_login,         alternate_routing_designator,          assembly_item_number,         process_flag,
         transaction_type) ;
INSERT INTO bom.bom_op_sequences_interface
        (operation_seq_num,         department_id,         department_code,         option_dependent_flag,         operation_lead_time_percent,
         implementation_date,         effectivity_date,         disable_date,         count_point_type,         backflush_flag,         minimum_transfer_quantity,
         operation_sequence_id,         routing_sequence_id,         organization_code,         assembly_item_number,         last_update_date,
         last_updated_by,         creation_date,         created_by,         include_in_rollup,         alternate_routing_designator,         process_flag,
         transaction_type);
INSERT INTO bom.bom_op_resources_interface
        (resource_seq_num,         resource_code,         resource_id,         basis_type,         usage_rate_or_amount,         usage_rate_or_amount_inverse,
         assigned_units,         schedule_flag,         resource_offset_percent,         activity,         standard_rate_flag,         autocharge_type,         organization_code,         assembly_item_number,
         operation_seq_num,         effectivity_date,         last_update_date,         last_updated_by,         creation_date,         created_by,         alternate_routing_designator,
         operation_sequence_id,         routing_sequence_id,         process_flag,         transaction_type);
Where am I making a mistake.
Thanks in Advance.
Sambit Pradhan

Hi,
Try following
step 1. Insert routing header (bom_op_routings_interface) : Run Interface
step 2. Insert routing lines (bom_op_sequences_interface) with correct reference to routing_sequence_id: Run Interface
step 3. Insert all resource lines (bom_op_resources_interface) with correct reference to operation_sequence_id, routing_sequence_id , Run Interface.
Thanks,
Hrishi

Report EM12C for targets not associated with (Administration) Group

Is there a report/view in EM12C for showing which targets are not associated with a Administration Group or a standard group?

For administration groups, check the Unassigned Targets report, accessible from the Associations tab.
For more details, look for the section "Identifying Targets Not Part of Any Administration Group" in the Administration Groups chapter of the EM 12c Administrator's Guide:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24628_01/doc.121/e24473/administration_group.htm#EMADM10011

Tp import flag not properly set in "STMS", tp-processe not ended

since last Stopping of our Q-System the display in of the import queue doesnt work fine. when we transport requests from the development-system to the q-system the truck-icon doesn't disappear. the processes in AIX are not finished, after time the "overview of the transport logs" shows that the import is done, but the truck doesn't disaappear
we tested the transport tool (RSTPTEST): o.k., in the TMS configuration we made the communication test: o.k.
sometime we can make the truck disappear, when we delete the .LOB in /usr/sap/trans/tmp but this doesn't work with all requests

Check the Import monitor and the tp system log. If the truck icon still shows is most likely because the Import is not fully finished, As I said check the import monitor and let us know what it says.
Regards
Juan

What's the difference between transport route and transport layer

what's the difference between transport route and transport layer,Can somebody give me some explaination? thks in advance!

Hi,
Transport Layer in ABAP Workbench
    The Change and Transport System supports the distribution of development
    work on large projects across multiple SAP Systems.
    The packages in each development system are grouped into one transport
    layer.
    The transport layer determines whether objects are assigned to a local
    or transportable change request.
Use
    Each of your SAP development systems is assigned a transport layer as
    its standard transport layer. If you use Extended Transport Control, you
    can assign different standard transport layers to certain clients.
    You can define at the most one consolidation target for each SAP System
and transport layer.
When you create a package, it is assigned the standard transport layer
of the SAP System.
If you want to assign a different transport layer to a package, you
require the administration authorization for the Change and Transport
System.
The objects in a package automatically have the transport attributes
defined for the corresponding transport layer.
o   If a consolidation route originating in their SAP System is defined,
     then the objects are assigned to a transportable request, and
     transported into the consolidation target when it is released.
o   If a consolidation route is not defined, the objects are assigned to
     a local request, and are not transported.
Customizing settings are not assigned to a package. They have the
transport attributes of the standard transport layer of the system or
client.
It is best to assign a package a standard transport layer for which a
consolidation route originating in the development system is defined.
To display and maintain the transport layers and routes, use the
Transport Management System (transaction STMS).
Only the system adminstrator can make changes.
Caution:
     The tables TSYST, DEVL, TWSYS, TASYS are no longer productive as of
     Release 4.0A and cannot be maintained.
Regards
Ben

ChaRM transport route, one development, 2 QA, 2 PRD system landscape

Hello,
We have a customer who has an ERP system with a transport route which is the following:
One single Development system which feeds, 2 QA systems and then 2 PRD systems.
We are to implement ChaRM and we want to customize the tickets so that every time you execute the import action of a transport request into QA (and later into PRD) both systems QA1 and QA2 are updated and later on with PR1 and PR2.
We would like to know how to support this scenario in Solution Manager using ChaRM. How do we set up the logical component at SAP, how we define the transport route and layers, and how we define the actions in the SDHF ticket.
I appreciate your help.
Regards
Esteban

Hello,
We set up a testing environment for change request management. In a solution manager we created five clients. One single development which feeds two quality systems, and final two production system. As it was said in the thread we used transport groups in the transport route. The development system feeds this transport group which feed to import queus in quality systems. We tested this transport route and transports worked well and arrives into both production 1 and production 2 systems.
Then created a logical component for that landscape, with five sytems. Then we created a maintenance project using that logical component. We created a maintenance cycle and then a task list was created which shows two delivery system, and the two productive systems. All the groups have the right actions.
However when we created a SDHF correction the system creates the task list only for 3 systems, not for the five of them.
we see that only action groups are created for development, quality 1, and production 1. No entries for quality 2 and production 2
We try to run the action which is in the general part of the task list to execute the import in multiple systems, it cames out with the correct selection of importing in quality 2 system because it is the transport group. However an error is raised saying that the actions for quality 2 are not there in the task list which is true. Finally, as short term solution, we were able to import into quality 2 and later on pr1 but done manually in the stms transactions which is not what we want to do.
Regards
Esteban Hartzstein
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:06 AM
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:07 AM

ChaRM: transport route migration

Hi!
we have a lot of different transport routes with different transport layer and would like to implement ChaRM.
We have a lot of different transport routes with different transport layer where we assign the developer classes/packages.
Now we would like use ChaRM.
As we know ChaRM uses standard transport layer and transport route.
Therefore we plan to consolidate all the developer classes/packages assigning to none-standard transport layer and route and migrate them to standard transport layer and transport route
Questions:
1) Can some one confirm whether or not ChaRM uses the standard transport layer with standard transport routes?
2) Or is it possible to create own transport layer u201CZCRMu201D, assign them all the development class/package relevant for ChaRM and leave the other none-transport layer unchanged?
3) Can one development class/package be assigned to several transport layers?
4) Has some one experience dealing with the approach of migration?
(tcode SE16 --> T_DEVC)
It will be great get some information regarding these questionsu2026
Thank you very much!

Hello,
We set up a testing environment for change request management. In a solution manager we created five clients. One single development which feeds two quality systems, and final two production system. As it was said in the thread we used transport groups in the transport route. The development system feeds this transport group which feed to import queus in quality systems. We tested this transport route and transports worked well and arrives into both production 1 and production 2 systems.
Then created a logical component for that landscape, with five sytems. Then we created a maintenance project using that logical component. We created a maintenance cycle and then a task list was created which shows two delivery system, and the two productive systems. All the groups have the right actions.
However when we created a SDHF correction the system creates the task list only for 3 systems, not for the five of them.
we see that only action groups are created for development, quality 1, and production 1. No entries for quality 2 and production 2
We try to run the action which is in the general part of the task list to execute the import in multiple systems, it cames out with the correct selection of importing in quality 2 system because it is the transport group. However an error is raised saying that the actions for quality 2 are not there in the task list which is true. Finally, as short term solution, we were able to import into quality 2 and later on pr1 but done manually in the stms transactions which is not what we want to do.
Regards
Esteban Hartzstein
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:06 AM
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:07 AM

ChaRM:cCTS Configuration Import Targets Issue.

Hi ChaRM Experts,
Did any one configured cCTS for ChaRM in Solution Manager SP10 ?.
I have configured cCTS in our solution manager and created clusters for DEV, QAS and PRD and assigned satellite systems then distributed plugins every thing is fine till here.
Then defined transport routes between the clusters => CDV (consolidation)-> CQS (Delivery)-> CPD.
Then i am trying to insert source client and target client for CQS in Import Targets Tab, Followed below steps.
1) Call transaction STMS and choose Overview -> Transport Routes from the menu
2) Switch to edit mode
3) Double click on a target cluster , e.g the quality CQS
4) In the dialog box, select tab Import Targets
5) Choose Insert Row -> Insert Row is invisible i am unable to specify source and targets clients
Could some one please help how to make visible Insert Row icon ?.
Regards
gsr

Hello,
I can see in your screenshot that no cluster is assigned to the system for which you are trying to assign the import target.
You should verify that the cluster is validated and then try again to assign the import target.
I managed to assign them in SP10 without problems.
Regards
Renato

Unable to add transport route in HANA Application Lifecycle Management (XS)

Hi There,
When we are using HANA LM to create transport routes then routes are created but straight away it comes with following error message:
Internal Error: Transport Route(s) could not be retrieved.
We have checked that required roles are assigned to user. Roles are
sap.hana.xs.lm.roles::ExecuteTransport
or
sap.hana.xs.lm.roles::Administrator
Same works in DEV and PROD environment. I ran debug in Chrome and found that it is throwing an error when trying to run following:
http://XXXX:portnumber/sap/hana/xs/lm/core/transport.xsjs?enrich=true&_=XXXXXXX
After looking in HANA studio I have found that transport.xsjs has got following function which will throw above error on exception:
function retrieveTransport(req, res) {
if(!utils.checkForPrivileges(res, [ "sap.hana.xs.lm::Display"])){
    return;
var item = utils.getItem(req.path);
var enrich = req.parameters.get("enrich");
var deleted = req.parameters.get("removed");
try {
    if (typeof item === 'undefined') {
      var transportRoutes = trans.readAllTransports(deleted);
      if (enrich) {
        enrichTransportRoutes(transportRoutes,deleted);
      utils.setNoCacheHeaders(res);
      res.contentType = 'application/json';
      res.setBody(JSON.stringify(transportRoutes));
      res.status = $.net.http.OK;
    } else {
      // retrieve transport path id
      var tpath = trans.readTransport(item);
      if (!tpath) {
        utils.reportError(res, null, utils.getText("TRANSPORT_ID_INVALID", item));
      } else {
        res.contentType = 'application/json';
        res.setBody(JSON.stringify(tpath));
        res.status = $.net.http.OK;
} catch (ex2) {
    utils.reportError(res, null, utils.getText("ROUTES_NOT_RETRIEVED"), ex2.toSource());
Please see attached chrome console log for more info:
I am able to retrieve information about this but I am not sure what is causing this. Your help will be really appreciated.
Regards
Angad

I've also tried the following wlst:
createJCRFileSystemConnection(server='SERVER-MS1', appName='application', name='Repository', path='/APP/ContentRepository/')
But then i'm getting:
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Could not find MBean operation "createConfig(java.lang.String)" for MBean registered under "oracle.adf.share.config:ApplicationName=application,name=ADFConfig,type=ADFConfig,Application=application" and implementd by "class oracle.adf.mbean.share.config.RuntimeMXBeanImpl"
Error in creating configuration with name "oracle.adf.mbean.share.config.runtime.webcenter.doclib.AdfDoclibConfig"
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Could not find MBean operation "refresh()" for MBean registered under "oracle.adf.share.config:ApplicationName=application,name=ADFConfig,type=ADFConfig,Application=application" and implementd by "class oracle.adf.mbean.share.config.RuntimeMXBeanImpl"
An error occurred while performing "setAttribute" on "PrimaryConnectionName"
javax.management.RuntimeMBeanException: These mbeans encountered exceptions and may not have been saved
Repository- JCR -- Could not do this operation, the backing store for this context is read only.Edited by: Harry van Oosten on May 10, 2010 10:33 PM

STMS Transport Route Administration - Import Targets not modifiable.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for