STO cond type P100 vs. P101

Hi All,
What's the difference between P100 and P101. While P100 has an Access Seq and Pricin Proc for Supplm Conditions, P101 does not.
P100 is Transfer price of supplying plant. Is this the price adopted ot the Billing Document in SD?
Currently we have P101 from Pricing Schema RM2000 for STO, but the PO price shows as Zero in the Output Message (but in P101 correctly shows the Material Val Price in Cond tab). Is this because we're Not using P100 (Transfer Price)?
Thanks in Advance

hi
for P100 condition type, condition category is basic price and acess sequence is assigned to it . so for system to pick price you have to maintain condition record using MEK1
but for P101 you have condition categoy as cost price
which it picks from material master.
Regards,
vijay

Similar Messages

Problem with STO cond.type FRB1

Hi Seniors,
For Stock Transport Order the system is not considering the Freight condition FRB1 filled in the Header of the Purchase order. As a result, the system is not calculating the GR/IR value and the related FICO posting waiting for the Invoice from the Vendor.
In the header there are 3 condition records for FRB1 for
10,07 EUR
1.840,00 USD
135,81 EUR
When posting the Goods issue , in the Accounting document we can't find any posting related condition FRB1 to Freight clearing and Freight finish goods (FR1 and FRE accounting procedures linked to condition type FRB1)"
Kindly help me
Regards,
Jana

Hi,
Accurals has been ticked in M/06. What is the use of that ? both header and item condition has been ticked in M/06. what shoudl i do???
regards,
janamm

STO condition type P101

Hi All,
How does STO condition type P101 picks up the supplying plan't material cost (from accounting view) into the STO conditions. There's no access seq for P101 and therefore no cond rec can be maintained...right?
I trying to understand how the material stand cost from material master it pulled into the STO condition type P101?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
In M/06, for condition type P101 (Valuation Price of Supplying Plant), check following;
Cond. class B Prices
Calculat.type C Quantity
Cond.category G Cost
Because of Condition Category "G", Condition Type "P101" picks the MAP or Standard Price of the Material from the Supplying Plant.

Pricing condition settings with list cond type

Hi all,
I have a very urgent problem in pricing settings. We are in CRM 4.0 sp6 scenario linked to an ECC 5.
In ECC 5 have been set some condition record that provide the field "list cond type" as blank. This are calculated in ECC but not in CRM that cannot read the blank as value.
Any ideas?
Very urgent.
Thank in advance.
Fabrizio

Hello Fabrizio,
Please refer 1010258 and see if this helps.
Please reward some points.
regards,
Muralidhar Prasad.C

Condition Type to add up prev cond types

hi All,
Sorry for my limited knowledge--I want to know if I've to create a new cond type and put in the Pricing Proc:
10     ZPR0     List Price
15     ABCD       jk;avvjnk;
20     ZABC     ABC Discount
25    GHIJ          aknvnan
30     ZXYZ      Temporary price reduction
40          Gross Net Price
50     ZSSS     SSS standard discount
60     ZSUM       Sum of ZPROZABCZXYZ
280     NETW     Value of Goods
290     ZGRV     Gross Value
how can I do the step 60, without using subtotals?
Regards,
Rags.

Dear Rags
Not sure, whether you can succeeed but make a try.
You have to insert three step numbers as follows:-
Step::CType::Description::::::::::From:::To:::BasTyp
55:::::::::::::::::subtotal1:::::::::::::::10::::::15:::::164
56:::::::::::::::::subtotal2:::::::::::::::20::::::25:::::164
57:::::::::::::::::subtotal3:::::::::::::::30:
60:::::ZSUM::::Sumtotal:::::::::::::::55::::::57
Last but not least, dont feel sorry as everybody is learning by trying to give solution as like your case.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

VPRS cond type is not appearing after creating a sales order

Dear Friends,
I have copied pricing procedure from Std pric procedure i.e from RVAA01.
In Material master in Accounting 1the following things are maintained,
Valuation Class--7920 ( Finished products)
VC Sales Order Stock--7920 ( Finished products)
Pricing Control-V ( Moving average Price/Periodic unit price)
Standard Price--- Blank
Price Unit--1
Total stock--100
In Pricing procedure VPrS cond type is included and settings are as follow,
Statistics---Relevant
Subtotal-- B ( carry over value to KOMP-WAVWR (cost))
Requirement--4
Item Catg is TAN and in Business data it is relevant for Determine Cost.
Activated cost determination for item categ TAN
But when I am creating sales order VPRS cond type is not appearing.
Analysis is saying
The requirement 004 is assigned to this condition in the pricing procedure. This requirement was not met and so the condition was excluded from further processing.
Can anybody tell me where I am going wrong?
Regards,
Shrikant

Hi Friends,
Thanks for your reply as per your instruction I have maintained cond type and also in Pric procedure I removed 4 from Requirement column.
Now I am getting following error,
Diagnosis
This condition has not been determined using condition records. The amount or value should be determined from another data source. For cost (condition category 'G') it is read using conditions from the material valuation segment, for a cash discount condition it is read using conditions from the terms of payment table.
In this transaction an error occurs - the material valuation segment or the terms of payment table could not be read or a currency translation has failed.
System Response
The condition has been provided with the deactivated indicator 'X'.
Procedure
Refer to the messages in the status line of the condition overview screen.
Regards,
Shrikant

MRP-Exclude STO document type from MRP Run

Hi,
I want to exclude STO document type from MRP run, so that STO Open qty will not be considered as open qty while doing MRP.
I have checked below settings but didn't worked.
1. In OMI8 - I have unchecked "Stock in Transfer"
2. SPRO->Materials Management->Consumption-based Planning->Planning->Define torage Location MRP per plant
     Here I have excluded ONE storage location from MRP and same storage location has been used in the STO.
Can anyone know how to resolve this ?
Regards,
Rakesh

Rakesh,
Yes, they will not be relevant for MRP. Neither will anything else in that storage location. However, the setting is not in configuration, but in the material master (MRP4 tab).
The configuration setting you mentioned has no impact on existing material masters, it is only used to determine the default settings for newly created storage location entries for a material/plant..
You can set a particular material/plant/stlocn to be irrelevant for MRP. This relevancy is irrespective of document type, it can be a STO, a purchase req, a sales order, a production order, or it could be stock (inventory) - all supply and demand in this material/plant/stlocn are excluded from MRP processing.
MRP relevancy of storage location is set at the material/plant/storage location level in the material master.
If you do not wish to exclude a storage location from MRP, then you will have to find another way to make your STOs Irrelevant for MRP. As I said earlier, STOs (like any other Purchase orders that are configured to process stock ), are generally considered to be relevant for MRP.
If you were a client, I would suggest that you rethink your business model that drives this requirement.
If the business model cannot be altered, and the storage location solution is unacceptable, then you will be stuck with a customized solution.
Best Regards,
DB49

Tax cond types are different in SD & FI

Dear All
One thing I am not able to understand..
Tax cond type which I define in FI, I am not able to see in SD. Here is the path in FI
SPRO-->FINANCIAL ACCOUITNG > FINANCIAL ACCOUTING GLOBAL SETTINGS->TAX ON SALES/PURCHASES>BASIC SETTINGS-> define cond type
Whereas I define cond type in SD, path is
SPRO --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Pricing --> Define cond type.
at both places cond type do not matches and this causes error in billing doc and accounting doc is not generated.
Can any body help.
Regards
Neeraj Jain

Hi SJ
First of all thanks for answering me.
When I try to release the invoice for Accounting, I get t he error message.
Tax code in procedure ZTAXIN is invalid
Message no. FICORE704
Diagnosis
The tax code entered is not defined in the country for this company code.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
1. Check whether the required tax determination procedure is assigned to the relevant country. the Procedure field is in the detail screen.
2. Create a new tax code if required.
The above one is error message.
Regards
Neeraj Jain

Error:No text defined for language ZF usage A appl V.cond type ZABC(T685T)

Hi Experts,
I have created a new condition type ZABC for discount correction and the pricing is working perfectly as required.
The issue is when I login using Chinese language ZF, then I get the below error in VA01-
No text is defined for language ZF usage A appl V.cond type ZABC(T685T).
I checked the table T685T, and condition type ZABC is not maintained for language ZF.
I tried maintaining the table but was unable to.
Can anyone of you please help me how to maintain these entries in table T685T.
I think this can be done through config route. Please help.
Thanks and regards,
Sheetal

Hi,
Goto the Transaction code SE16 and enter the table and click on CREATE and maintain the Langage and text for you condition type.
there is no direct maintenance view for this table.
regards,
santosh

Multiple STO document types conflict in ME59N

Folks,
I have the following scenario's:
1) PReq NB with item category U -> intercompany STO NB (depends on the supplying and receiving plant) document types gets determined correctly through STO document type customizing (T161W)
2) Preq NB with item category u -> intracompany STO UB, document types gets determined correctly through STO document type customizing (T161W)
3) exception flow where preq ZF gets created through a development. This is also inter- and intracompany traffic. In case it's intercompany it should get ZF1 and in case it's intracompany it should get ZF2.
I've set preq - PO linkage that ZF preq can be linked to ZF1 and ZF2. Now when running ME59N, it seems that system only takes settings of T161W into consideration and wants an NB document type and this is not allowed (preq - PO linkage table).
Any suggestions how to set up scenario 3?
MZ

Hi,
Please read OSS note 114213.
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=237357&highlight=&sid=a33e51e7989bd52296035460ee048409
Regards,
Csaba

Cond. types 0K05 and 0K04 have the same condition function in pric. proc.

Hello Friends,
I am getting the error in pricing procedure as follows:
Cond. types 0K05 and 0K04 have the same condition function in pric. proc. 0CRM01
Message no. CRM_LEASING_GEN203
Why this error is coming ? Could any one please help me with this.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
This errors seems to be very rare. I cam e accross one similar issue which has been saved by implementing note 1524217.
Can you please check if it matches with your release and if yes implement it.
Best regards
Christophe

The use of Cond type tab in Pricing procedure determination

Hi Guys,
In T-code:OVKK we are doing the pricing procedure determination. But ther is one tab called as :CType(Cond Type) there in that screen after our pricing procedure. Could you please some one tell me what is the use of this cond type and where it's reflecting in SAP.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi,
It is very useful to avoid Data entry work Pricing Conditiontype for example: PR00.
Ex: When your creating Sales order by using Item proposal there may be 100 item
if you maintain this in OVKK you no need enter the price for each item when ever your process sales order just creat condition record by using VK11 and condition type PR00.
Proposed condition type for fast entry
The condition type that the system automatically proposes in the double-line entry screen during sales order processing.
ProcedureEnter a condition type. If you leave the field blank, the system displays the active price condition during sales order processing.
ExceptionIf you change a condition manually, this will be displayed in the double-line entry screen.
Regards,
MH
Edited by: Mohammad Minahazoddin on Nov 22, 2010 9:54 AM

Vprs cost excluded+ Cond type JIND ineffective.

hi,
in my pricin procedure i have this error as VPRS cost being ineffective and hence not applied in my pricing.
can any one specify the details of VPRS cond type just to verify as to how its getting applicable.
also if for J1AU cond. type i have access sequence JIND.
plz elaborate on its specific details like cond. rec, calc.type,acc.key.

Hi Friends,
Thanks for your reply as per your instruction I have maintained cond type and also in Pric procedure I removed 4 from Requirement column.
Now I am getting following error,
Diagnosis
This condition has not been determined using condition records. The amount or value should be determined from another data source. For cost (condition category 'G') it is read using conditions from the material valuation segment, for a cash discount condition it is read using conditions from the terms of payment table.
In this transaction an error occurs - the material valuation segment or the terms of payment table could not be read or a currency translation has failed.
System Response
The condition has been provided with the deactivated indicator 'X'.
Procedure
Refer to the messages in the status line of the condition overview screen.
Regards,
Shrikant

Can a GL be assigned to Cond type RA01?

Hie.
Can condition type RA01 (Discount) be automatically tag to G/L accounts?.
My scenario - user wants to create sales order with RA01 in it. When saving the sales order with the net vale after less RA01, user expect to have an automate Sales Order or Billing to capture the discount RA01 into accounting document.
I could not find in customizing that we can assign G/L accounts to RA01, the same as we can assign it to material AAG.
I would appreciate any idea on how to capture the requirement as explained above.

Hi all,
TQ for yr responds. I have tried steps mentioned in above replies. However, in VKOA, i have to fill in these data:
Application        - V
Condition typ     - ???*
Chart of Acct     - 0001
Sales Org.        - ???**
Acct asgnmt g - ???***
Account key     - ERS
My queries:
In my Cond Type, there is only 2 data available i.e KOFI and KOFK. When i tried to insert RA01, system prompt me error message "entry C V RA01 does not exist in T685"
I've checked T685, and found the following:
Usage   Application    Cond Type
A              M               RA01
A              V               RA01
C              V               KOFI
C              V               KOFK
Usage A is Pricing and usage C is Account Determination. How can i insert RA01 as C when in the first place it is categorised as Pricing (A)?
Sales Org - if i have 50 sles org to maintain its GL for RA01, does this mean that i have to maintain the GL one by one per sales order here?
Acct Assgnmt Grp - i believe that AAG is extracted from Material Master Data. But RA01 is a Pricing COndition Type which carries no AAG. What should i put it here? How can i assign GL without AAG? (If i choose Table 5 - Acct Key instead Table 3- Material Grp/Acct Key, tehre is no AAG specified. Can i choose this?)
Would very much appreciate yr feedback on this matter.
TQVM!

VAT & CST Cond Types

D/ Friends,
I want 2 config a sample scenario. I've 4 plants situated in 4 different states:
Plant 1 in State 1
Plant 2 in State 2
Plant 3 in State 3
Plant 4 in State 4
Now, in the Calculation schema, I want to config 2 condition types, one for VAT & other for CST as follows:
If material is purchased for Plant 1 from State 1 VAT is applicable- VAT Cond. Typ
If material is purchased for Plant 1 from the State other than State 1 CST is applicable- CST Cond Typ
Similarly if mat is purchased for Plant 2 from State 2- VAT is applicable & from othe state- CST. Both the condition types are to be maintained in the calculation sshema & both the Cond. Types are to be maintained for all the Plants in the same way as above. Plz tell the complete config right from the conditon table to condition record. Assume that no excise is involved as the plants are just assembling units.
Thank you.

Hi,
Condition Type in TAX Procedure are plant indepenedent.
Make different Tax Code as per the requirement for
VAT - JVRN - VAT Non Deductable
JVRD - VAT Deductable
CST - JIPC
Go to FTXP create New Tax Code
After that Go FV12 to assigen % for the Condition for that particular Tax Code.
Hope Help U !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

STO cond type P100 vs. P101

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for