STO Creation

During STO creation between plant ot plant,
after entering material i see following message..
Transfer price is not maintained for material : 279005134328
Please guide..i maintnd price in MM02-acounting view/costing..

Check Note 122008 - Activate transfer prices/mult.valuation approaches
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

  • STO creation against the Work Order

    How to specify the source plant or source storage location within PM Work Order for the components/materials.
    Currently on the components page of work order, we can specify the material and vendor. In our case the vendor is other storage location within same plant or diff. plant.
    How can we specify the source in components page so that PRs and reservations are created correctly.
    In details here is the problem-
    During work order (PM Order) creation user is specifying a non-stock material and issuing storage location "0002". The material will be issued by sto. loc. 0002.
    Storage location "0002" sources this material from other storage location "0001".
    So we want to generate a Purch Req. with item category "U", account assignment 'F" (with work order) and ability to specify the source plant-storage location.
    But the system is creating a normal expense PR with account assignment "F" to the work order. This PR is having grayed out item category so not able to convert into Stock Transport STR by specifying the source plant and storage location.

    Hi MM
    Have you solved your problem? What did you do to create the STR?
    Regards
    Eduardo Chagas

  • Instant STR TO STO creation during RBATP

    Hello Experts,
    I would like to get your opinion on how to instantly convert an STR (PreqRel) to STO in APO.
    Here is the scenario:
    Created an SO in with product P1 at its primary location L1
    I have a rule set up in APO wherein if L1 doesnt have stock go to L2 and transfer the stock via STR (this is what is happening right now)
    So in the Source location ie L1 in rrp3, there is a SO and Purchase requisition.
    In RRP3 view of L2 its STR.
    Here are my questions.
    I see that in RRP3 view of L1 the Purchase req is always PP firmed. Can we create an PR without this PP firm column checked?
    We are running deployment heuristics and then TLB (handled by other team), what does it mean for these systems when STR is PP firmed.
    Is there a possibility of creating an STO directly rather than STR. If yes then what is the config setting? I know that STR can be converted through RRP7 in apo. But I dont want the system to create STR at all.
    Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
    Regards

    Hi ,
    For creation of non PP-Firmed Orders you should check conversion routines in APO .
    PP-Firmed receipts means "system cannot change the receipt quantities, or delete the order, during planning with the production planning heuristics, even if the requirements quantity has changed. However, you can change the receipt quantity or delete the order manually".
    STR Step can not be eliminated . Its essential for planning phase to create STR which later should get converted to STO in execution phase .
    Hope this helps !!
    Regards,
    Love Singh

  • STO Creation Error

    Hello experts,
    I'm working on cross company STO process. I have setup the org structure P. Org., Slaes org, DC, Division, SIte-DC, Site store and customer for the store too (DC in Company code B and Store in Company code A). While creating STO getting error that customer ABC is not maintained for store XYZ but in fact it is maintained in the sales area of compnay code A and extended to sales area of company code B in which Distribution Center falls.
    Any idea what I'm missing? We can not assign the customer to site in IMG as it is not allowed in Retail system.
    Thanks for any help.
    Regards,
    KHAN

    Hi Khan
    In IS Retail Intercompany stock transfer
    u create site (store ) with t.code  WB01 e.g A001 is u r site (store ) u add the customer data while create site so in that case A001 will be customer
    now D.C. u can create the same t.code WB01 e.g. B001  and mention Customer and Vendor for that site 
    and extend the store A001 and respective distribution chain for another company code sales organization
    hope it will help
    i run this scenario recently
    need any help tell me
    regards

  • PO/STO Creation based on Stock Levels

    Dear all,
    We have the following scenario to be configured.
    1. When PO/STO being created, if stock is available in DC, STO should be created.
    2. If Stock in DC is zero, PO should be raised against a specific vendor
    How can this be achieved?
    Thanks,
    Satish

    Hi
    What is DC?
    If you use MRP type VB in material master MRP view and maintain reorder level as 100 EA, then whenever stock fall below 100 EA in that Plant a PR will be generated.
    If you have sourcelist and info record with fixed vendor then source assigned PR will be generated then that PR can be made as automatic PO in ME59.
    If you have scheduling agreement and sourcelist with MRP relevency indicator 2, then instead of PR, schedule line will be created during MRP run if the stock is below 100EA
    Hope it will solve your problem
    Regards
    Antony

  • Can anyone help with a method to ignore GR Processing Time during STO Creation?

    On my current client, we have a unique business scenario where we need to maintain GR processing time to reflect "incubation or hold" time for products after production. It is absolutely necessary that the products should not be available to ship to the customers until this "incubation or hold" time is elapsed and the products are inspected & ready for customer shipments. However, the products can be shipped to other DCs within the client's internal network while the products are under "incubation" as it can take place while the products are in-transit. Therefore, the products are available for shipping immediately after production within the client's internal network of DCs. This is why we need a mechanism to ignore the GR processing time while the products are shipped on STOs within the network. At the same time the GR processing time should be considered while the products are shipped against customer SOs outside the network.
    To explain the scenario a bit further, this is a simple scenario: Factory A --> DC1 --> DC2. Factory A produces products to be stored and DC1, which ships to its own customers as well as to DC2 to fulfil customer demand at DC2. "Incubation" time of products is performed in DC1. Therefore, Sales Orders at DC1 should not be able to ship until this "incubation" time has elapsed at DC1. This can be accomplished by maintaining GR processing time equal to "incubation or hold" time at DC1 and it works well for Sales Order and its Delivery ATP check. On the other hand, STOs from DC1 to DC2 can ship immediately after production while the product is still under "incubation" as the required hold time can elapse while the products are in-transit between DC1 and DC2. Therefore, STO & its Delivery ATP check should consider production from factory A to be immediately available after production. Note that the incoming production from factory A is represented by an STR between factory A and DC1. Per my research this functionality is not available in standard SAP as GR processing time is considered in ATP check for both SOs and STOs. However, if anyone knows of a way to separate out ATP check for SOs and STOs where SO considers GR processing time while STO does not then that would greatly help.
    Appreciate any suggestions or solutions.
    Regards,
    Jagjeet.

    Hello Jageet,
    Please refer this discussion,
    ATP check. Problem with GR processing time
    Best Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • STO creation with respect to SO

    Hi All,
    I have several SO's created thru which STO will be created.
    In which table ot tcode ,i can see for so many SO's, STO's need to be created?
    Please suggest.
    Regards

    HI venkateshwaran
            VA05    List of Sales Orders
            VA07    Compare Sales - Purchasing (Order)
            VA08    Compare Sales - Purchasing (Org.Dt.)
    tables
            VBAK               Header data
         VBAP               Item data
         VBPA               Partners in sales order
         VBKD               Sales district data
         VBEP               Data related to line items, delivery lines
    Regards,
    Krishna

  • STO Creation - Availability check

    When you create an STO & if there is not enough stock in supplying plant, you got a WARNING message saying something like u201C of Material XXXXXX, only 49 EA are available on desired dateu201D.  The STO is saved but the system put a date of 12/31/9999 into the COMMITTED DELIVERY DATE for that material/line item. Even when additional materials are available, since the COMMITTED DELIVERY DATE is 12/31/9999, SAP will not try to deliver them.  Now the business is asking to change this warning message to  error message (06 450 Message number). If I change this warning message to error message, I believe it will impact all other type of STO's, PO's & SO's also. We want this warning message to be changed to Error message only for a particular STO type. What are the options available to us.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Feb 2, 2012 8:33 AM

    You can control document type by putting some logic in some user exit.Suppose If PO first line item has no stock available and other line items confirmed in this case if you make it error that message then you can not save the STO?.For smooth flow STO keep the message to warning and tell the Business to follow the process.If Business really insisted to stop creating the PO if any line item is not confirmed then you can try for user exit.

  • STO Creation Supplying Vendor not determined

    Hi Friends,
    while I am creating STO system is showing following error....Enter Suppl. Vendor
    Message no. ME083
    Is any setting issue in  my DC?

    Hi,
    In STO Go On Header Data Partner Tab page and assign DC Vendor Number....

  • STO creation time warning!!!

    Of material A-661, only 0 PU are available on desired date
    Message no. 06450
    Diagnosis
    In the case of at least one of the items or schedule lines you entered, the requested quantity of material A-661 is not available on the specified date.
    Procedure
    Choose a later date or reduce the requested quantity (because only 0 PU is/are available on the desired date.)
    Note
    For an overview of the current situation, refer to the MRP stock/requirements list.
    Do you want to see the stock/requirement list?
    Perform function
    While creating the STO.. This warning iam Getting.....what is the reason...This material is doesnot have stock....
    So by testing purspose .. i have created one more material .. that is also does not have stock... so then while creating STO,, system will Not through me such warning
    iam not get such warning  for this material
    Can you tell me what to do?
    Regards
    sapman

    When is the availability check carried out?
    Answer:
    When adding an item or changing MRP-relevant data.
    On the scheduling screen only when exiting the screen. If the entire requested quantity is not available, the system issues message 06450 that can be defined as a warning message or an error message. As of Release 4.6C, the quantity is also specified here. For problems with the message, see Notes 455412 and 442218.
    The availability overview can be displayed manually from the stock transfer document via Environment -> Availability (see below).
    also check the oss note 498149

  • STO CREATION Facing This problem

    *Article not subj. to inventory mgmt. in site M001 (Pl. check your input)*

    Hi,
    Have you maintained Article for this particular site.
    Pl check whether the article is blocked for procurement/warehousei n MM41 in Basic data X-Site Status .
    Regards,
    S.V.ManiKumaar

  • Availablity check at storage location level in STO

    Hi,
      There is an unique requirement from my client with respect to the Availability check at storage location level in STO
    Process:
      Based  on the inputs from APO we are creating STR for moving the material from one plant to another plant. These STR’s will be converted into STO through ME59N batch job. During STO creation process system will do the availability check and only if stock is available in the issuing plant then only STO will be generated.
    During this availability check the stock will be considered at plant level and not at storage location level.
    Requirement/Scenario:
    Issuing plant contains two storage location ( location A & B).FG stock exists in both the locations.
    Our requirement is system should create separate line items in the STO based on the availability of the stock in the respective storage locations.
    Example
    Total required qty: 1000  of material X
    material X - Stock in Storage location A  : 600
    material X - Stock in Storage location B : 400
    Two separate line item needs to be created in the STO
    Sl no
    Material
    qty
    Issuing storage location
    1
    X
    600
    A
    2
    X
    400
    B
    Is there any function module available for doing Availability check at storage location level so that it can be called in ME59N with the enhancement.
    Please suggest how to achieve this. If any enhancements needs to be done we will do it.
    Thanks & regards,
    Prashanth

    Hi Nilesh,
    in SAP standard the system is always checking on plant level first and then on the storage location level, there is no possibility to change this behaviour.
    I'm also not sure if the process is correct, because if you have also requirements on plant level only then you would create negative ATP if you confirm on storage location level even though there is no ATP on plant level.
    I'm also not aware of a user-exit that would suite your requirement, additionally according to the IMG documentation the user-exits in the availability check area should only be carried out in agreement with SAP.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Excise Invoice Error in STO from Manufacturing to Manufacturing Plant

    Hi,
    This is a scenario of Intracompany (within a company) STO from one manufacturing to another manufacturing Plant. Steps involved are
    ME21N: STO Creation with doc type UB
    VL10B: Outbound Delivery
    VL02N: PGI (Mvt Type 641)
    VF01: Billing
    J1IIN: Excise Invoice
    MIGO: Goods Receipt in Receiving Plant
    The problem is while doing Goods Receipt (MIGO) wrf Outbound Delivery in Receiving Plant when we refer the Excise Invoice (created in J1IIN) we are getting an error message as u201CExcise Invoice 2000000033 31.05.2011 of Vendor 1300003 does not exist for Referenceu201D
    Customer and Vendor master for the plants as well as STO configuration seems to be complete but still we are getting this error message.
    Can anyone provide some idea how to resolve this?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi
    when we refer the Excise Invoice (created in J1IIN) we are getting an error message as u201CExcise Invoice 2000000033 31.05.2011 of Vendor 1300003 does not exist for Reference
    If I am not wrong in J1IIN ,you get two number ,one will be internal number try to capture with internal number
    Regards
    Kailas ugale

  • MRP issue for future delivery PO/STO date

    We have a sceanrio where the available material quantity in MRP list is considering future delivery date STO quantity.  The PO delivery date is 08.11.2008 and MRP run date is 07.11.2008.
    Step 1, material master details:
    Material = 16814, MRP Type = PD, Lot size = EX, Special Procurement = D0 (Stock Transfer), Consumption mode = 2 Backward\forward consumption, Fwd Consumption per = 0.
    Step 2, MRP list details , before PO creation:
    MRP list before having any purchase order = 191-
    i.e, Available qty on 07.11.2008 with a DepReq = 191-
    Step 3, Creating Purchase oder (In our case it is STO):
    We created one Stock Transport Order on 7th Nov 2008 giving Delivery date as 08 Nov 2008 which is in future. Our plant is receiving plant = y100.
    PO quantity = 2
    Step 4, Running MRP in MD02:
    Processing key       =   NETCH               Net Change in Total Horizon       
    Create purchase req.   = 1                   Purchase requisitions             
    Delivery schedules   =   3                   Schedule lines                    
    Create MRP list   =      1                   MRP list                          
    Planning mode     =      3                   Delete and recreate planning data                                                                   
    Scheduling         =     1                   Determination of Basic Dates for Pl
    Result = PR is getting created for Qty = 189, but our actual required  qty = 191 - meaning it is considering the future delivery date(8th Nov 2008) PO qty while creating PR and removing that qty while creating PR's on 7th Nov 2008.
    Here we are running the MRP on today (7th Nov 2008). STO delivery date is 8th Nov 2008
    Step 5, MRP List details, after STO creation:
    Now the PO is coming in MRP list and the available qty is 189-
    Earlier stock before purchase order is 191 - after creating purchase order (STO) for future delivery date available qty is coming as 189-
    DepReq is still 191- but the total available qty is changing to 189-
    We want PR to be created for DepReq of 191 and not 189.

    In step 2
    What is the stock?
    If it is PO then the qty cannot be in  minus 189
    step3
    Where are u running MRP? In receiving plant or sending plant and all the steps you are showing for which plant?
    It is confusing...
    What i can say is in general if it is MTS scenario, then system will always consideres stock + receipt - issues = 0 after running MRP.
    If it is MTO, then for each sales order/project segment stock + receipt - issues = 0...
    Hence apply your situation in the plant and see the data.

  • Valuation Type Check in STOs

    In STO creation in ME27 Transaction, the field Valuation Type is mandatory.In availability check, we could able to find the available stock at issuing plant at quantity level. But our requirement is how to find the issuing plant stock at each Valuation type level? Is there any setting in aAvailability Check? or any Standard System message available?
    Thanks & Regards.

    Hi...
    dear frnd the valuation type field is mandatory because the material for which you are creating a STO is split valuated, means in accounting view of the material you have maintained something in  the field "Valuation category".
    If this is the case, when  you received the goods in supplying plant you should have entered valuation type as your batch.
    And if the material is batch managed you have to check the valuation type for the batch in which the material stock exist.
    Batch can be displayed in T-Code - MSC3N (Tables -  MCHA and MCHB) Kindly check the data in both tables.
    Hpe this will solve the problem.
    Regards,
    Amit P hiran
    njoy SAP...
    njoy Lyf...

Maybe you are looking for

  • Integrate Crystal Reports to Business Objects

    We are trying to introduce Crystal Reports into our current BOE environment and are trying to keep the 'custom password synchronization code' authentication method we have in place for Business Objects with Crystal.  If at all possible.  We have a cu

  • Any one can help how to install sharepoin2013 in multi servers .any deployment guide please provide

    Any one can help how to install sharepoin2013 in multi servers .if you have any  guide please provide

  • FCP export makes a blank AC3

    Hi, I'm exporting a film to go to DVDSP. I'm doing what I've done for the past n years. In the sequence>export using compressor>my presets come up (90 minute high quality MPEG2 and Dolby AC3 2.0). The video goes out fine (the project closes in FCP wh

  • Budgeted units with 2 decimal places

    Is there any way to show budgeted unit up to 2 decimal places , normally when we assign values in decimal P6v7 automatically round off values.

  • Purhcase order item change user exit

    Hello all,         I want to change the field value of purchase order item. is there any exit for changing the field value. Regards Srinivas Moderator message: please do your own research before asking. Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Dec 21, 2010 3:54 PM