STO deliveries

In a STO with delivery scenario, I have a problem.
VL10B for sales order should not consider stock in quality
VL10B for purchase order STO (UB) should take stock in quality.
So, for purchase orders, I defined a new checking rule "ZM" for the checking group ZB defined in the material master.
This checking rule considers stock in quality and was assigned to the configuration(spro>Po>STO> Assign delivery type and checking rule ZB> ZM.
Scenario
I have 0 unrestricted stock, 5 in quality.
I create a STO PO, confirmed 5 (because the checking rule is considering stock in quality) and CO09 represent the situation accordingly.
When I want to create the delivery for my PO STO using VL10B, I'm getting an error, "only 0 ea material is available" ...
Question, Is there another checking rule to configure at delivery creation? Is it considering only the default checking rule "B"?
Please help me...

Hi,
You can not issue a stock which is under a quality check in your company.Once a material is posted to Quality means what, you have to check it and make a decision over it saying that , this stock can be used -right?
Onece a decesion is made over it , either it has to post to unrestricted or retun based upon the quality or scrap etc.
Only unrestricted stock will be issued to such STO purposes and hence make a transfer post and deliver .
Regards,

Similar Messages

Reg:list of stock tranporting order(STO) deliveries whose GR is open

Hi All,
please respond ,
i search this question in forums,this question was repeated
but unanswerd, my requirement is.
get the list of deliveries for STO and whose GR is open
is there any standard bapi to get like this...
if there is no bapi for this let me know the table names to maintain GR status for deliveries, so that i will generate my own function module.
( please dont suggest me to use transaction VL06I and so,
i want bapi or table names)
Thank you
Sumalatha.

Hi lakshmi kumar thanks for u r reply,
but i didn't get you, please tell me the table names
for holding delivery orders and status for GR (for STO).
Thank you
Sumalatha.

Need to pull License type from GTS to R3 in case of STO documents

Hi Gurus,
Currently, In standard sales order process, we are using 2 functional modules in R3 to get the ECCN number and license type from GTS. This is required to populate on some billing output.
Functional modules used are:
/SAPSLL/***_DOCS_SD0C_FETCH_R3
/SAPSLL/***_DOCS_SD0C_GET_R3
Using above mentioned functional modules, we can only pull ECCN number and license type from GTS only if we pass sales document number to this FM and further system pulls ECCN and license type from GTS by referring the sales document number.
Issue:
We have a requirement is to pull the License type in case of STO documents also but STO documents/STO deliveries are not checked for GTS check, so we can not use above mentioned functional modules to pull the license type from GTS to R3 because STO/PO / deliveries do not exist in GTS.
I just have the material number with me and I need to pull the license type from GTS to R3.
Could anyone please advise the table name or any structure where i can pass the material number in GTS and can pull the license type to R3.
Your kind response would be appreciated.

Hi DG,
Thanks for your kind response. Regarding your second point, I am already pulling the ECCN number by using one customized functional module so I already have ECCN number with me. Could you please brief me how I can pull the License type linked to an ECCN number. What is the relationship table/ logic for pulling the license type by passing the ECCN number ??
Looking forward to your response.
Regards,
Anoop

Stock transport order deliveries

Hi,
The system seems to create duplicate deliveries when a job that run VL10i creates these deliveries.
Does anyone have any idea why the system is creating duplicates deliveries when running this batch job?
These are STO deliveries and they get created within seconds of each other.

Today I was reported by user, the similar situation happended!
I have one PO item, got two DN generated by same batch job, both have same qty.
I can tell, it is not a delivery split. Really two DN generated.
(To my feeling, Jürgen L. is trying to challenge the happening of this situation.)
I am still finding the reason, but I can tell, even every small indicator can affect SAP system behavior, but any indicator should make a duplicated DN generated.

Using V_V2 for STO

Hi all,
I have situation where I would like to use backorder processing for STO and confirm (or reconfirm) them on a regular basis. This is a pure MM situation and sales orders are not used. Also STO deliveries are not used in this scenario.
I have configured STO and assigned a checking rule (A) and E (delivery proposal) for ATP Adoption rule. I have a situation where there is more demand than supply and try to run V_V2 but it keeps saying that there are no entries in the backorder list. In V_V2 I select Process STO and in the sort order prioritise STO.
I also tried adding delivery type NL in the 'Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule' but yet no results.
Any ideas on what is wrong? Does backorder processing not work if there are no sales orders or deliveries?
Regards
Jayshree

Hello,
Precoditions for V_V2:
-Shipping data should be there
-V_V2 only takes the quantities on the plant level in considaration, the quantities just on the storage location level will not considered, because the design flaw is that picking the checking rule maintained in t161vn (storage location customization) and passing it on availability check routines is missing.
br, G

Deliveries which are pending (not picked yet) of PO

Dear All,
I have issued 10 outbound deliveries (STO) against a PO. Now, I want to know how many deliveries are still pending of this particular PO means deliveries which are not yet picked. Is any t.code is available. Please help me.
Sakhawat

Hi Sakhawat
To get the deliveries which are Not yet processed you please go to VL06O.
Ther you please specify the any Date ( Picking, Loading etc...as per ur requirement) and mention the delivery type NL becasue NL is the delivery type for STO deliveries then come to Status out Deliveries there you please specify the status as A:Not yet processed against Overall Picking Status if the material is relevant for Picking.
If it not relevant for picking the maintain the status against Total gds mvt stat. I hope you may get some information.
If you need against PO number let me see and come back to you...
Regards,
Durga Sana..

Enhance OVZ9 Screen with a new element

Dear Experts,
I know this has been discussed earlier and I had already searched through the forums to see an answer, but I could not find any and hence I am posting this here.
We have the following business requirement in the ECC ATP functionality.
1) We have different types of deliveries ( say QR delivery and normal delivery )
2) We do the ATP check during delivery creation and when we create the normal deliveries ( customer shipments ), we would like to exclude the already created QR deliveries from the ATP situation so that the customer shipments get the confirmation.
To achieve this, we would like to enhance the OVZ9 screen with a new element say "QR delivery" and we would like to keep it unchecked so that when a normal delivery gets created these QR delivery elements are unselected in the Scope of check and the confirmation is given to customer delivery ( normal delivery ).
Is this possible ? If yes - I would highly appreciate your guidance on this.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Babu Kilari
SCM APO Consultant

To be honest, I do not know why SAP uses these ATP_* views rather than the database table. I doubt it provides any significant value regarding performance. Then again, I am not a performance person so you would be checking with somebody who has performance knowledge.
we also intend to put this flag in the STO deliveries only for very few of them that undergo a specific process as per our business rules. So, the VBBE entries with this flag will be minimal
I know I said it earlier but I think it is worth re-iterating. The modification you are proposing is so big that you should check if it is really necessary, especially if you are talking about so few deliveries on the system. There could be a danger that you are under-estimating just how much the availability check (i.e. the code you are changing) is used throughout the system.
Another approach you could take is to use the EXIT_SAPLATPC_002 exit. This allows you to manipulate the ATP result. In here, you could just select the entries from VBBE that have the flag set (i.e. the flag that identifies them as STO deliveries). and then add this amount to the confirmed available quantity. So lets take this example:
Stock = 100
Issues = 100 [50 are sales order delivery, 50 are STO delivery].
Your scope of check includes deliveries. So at the moment, there is 0 available. You want that there is still 50 available. T_MDVEX-MNG02 will contain the confirmed available amount (so 0). You could implement a select on VBBE in your exit that searchs for deliveries belonging to STO (based on whatever flag you decide to use). Then your code will total the values of these requirements. In this example, there is just one requirement so total would be 50. Then add the total to T_MDVEX-MNG02. This means you have 50 available in the above example, and not 0.
So in summary, use the exit to:
- Select the STO deliveries from VBBE (using the modified select you were going to use in LATP2FV0)
- Total the quantities from the STO deliveries
- Add the total quantity to the confirmed available quantity (T_MDVEX-MNG02)
I think this approach is better as you can control in the exit when the STO deliveries are to be considered and you are not modifying code in include LATP2FV0 (I would be very wary of modifying that code). For example, you can put in conditions like "IF CHECKING RULE = "B" then do this", or "IF Transaction = then do this".

Adress field in PR,PO

Hi,
From where the adress field in delivery address screen of a purchase requisition and Purchase order gets updated?
even after I erased the contents it is again populating in ME22N.
Is this field will affect in creating outbound deliveries for Stock transport order.
Thanks

Soor,
Sounds to me like you have already experimented with this. Have you tried creating a delivery? What was the address?
I have never had a business reason to experiment in this area (I have never seen any problem with multiple delivery addresses in STO deliveries). However, I believe the address in the STO is determined, not copied. I further believe the address of the Delivery is copied from the STO, although I suppose it could be determined as well.
If you do the experiment, please publish your results.
Rgds,
DB49

IDOC Error V1 042 - Sales document X is currently being processed by user X

Hello Experts,
I am using the IS-Retail solution of SAP and I am facing a IDOC Error which keeps the IDOC in Status 51. I traced the Error Message and it was V1 042. I am using an Inbound IDOC 'SHP_OBDLV_CREATE_STO01' to create the STOs (Deliveries) using the POs and there is a locking issue of the PO giving error message 'Sales document XXX is currently being processed by user XXX'.
I have created a backgroung job using a program to post the STOs using IDOCs that picks up multiple files from Application Server and processes them one by one. Now when 2 or more files use the same PO then this error occus.
I added a couple of minutes of wait time between the file processing but that did not help.
Please let me know if you have faces same situation and what solution did you apply.
Regards,
PS

Hopefully you have fixed this by now, but for anyone else who might be looking at this problem. We had this problem and we had the 2 programs check to see if the other was already runing. If so the program would submit itself for a number of minutes, different for both programs, and then exit. We also, and just before this, checked to make sure that there were not 2 of the running programs running and if so to exit. This was necessary because re-scheduling could put a program in conflict with itself. I hope that this may help someone. We used the join V_OP and searched for the program name, not the job name.
Kevin

Actual GI Date not getting populated

Hi
My issue is that after the change in Fiscal Year, now in some of the STO Deliveries the Actual GI Date is not getting populated in Delivery Document, however the PGI is complete.
Any suggestion where should I look, and what may be reason / solution.
Regards
AA

AA,
What Lakshmipati has said is correct the Actual GI date does not get populated we enter it manually, only in the case if you are doing a delivery for 26th march then you can enter in Actual GI date field 26.03.2008. (at that point the Actual GI date will be empty, and you can enter the required date) This date is being taken by the material document which will be generated after performing PGI.
If you are raising the Order or STO today and you are pursuing with delivery today itself then the system willl take today's date.
Regards
Sathya

Stock transport PO process

Dear Gurus,
I have a very critical issue at my hand.I am breaking my head on this issue kindly help me in resloving this issue.
PO is raised for Qantity 5 by Reciving plant (A)
Stock is avilable in Supplying plant (B) 500 ( make to stock )
In MD04 requirement list it is showing as stock got allocated to PO(ConRel)
But from Plant B i am unable to created delivery using the VL10B or VL02N
I what so ever i tried i am unable to create Delivery
Please some body tell me what would be reason that i am unable to create delivery?
Thanks and Regards
Yoganand Pingili
SAP SD

Yoganand,
I will assume we are talking about a working system, and you are not debugging a new process that may not be fully operational yet.
To create a delivery, you have to fulfill all the selection criteria in VL10B. The most common problem is that the date of the PO is outside selection date range of VL10B. You can try extending the VL10B selection date range farther into the future.
The other criteria is that the system must first conduct an ATP against the requirement before it can create a delivery, the same as for SD requirements. If the ATP check fails, the delivery cannot be created. ATP availability check is defined in the Material Master, checking rule for STO deliveries are always 'B' or 'BE', same as for SD deliveries, Bear in mind that if the STO is 'account assigned' (this can happen if the material is defined in the destination plant as MTO), the requirement also may be account assigned, and will fail if only unrestricted stock is available.
Both of these types of problems can be seen if you review the log after the VL10B attempt.
You can simulate the ATP check in CO09.
In the error message you posted in your last post, this means you have failed the ATP check. So, although you say that there is adequate stock, the system says otherwise. You should probably review for competing requirements.
Rgds,
DB49

Using RF for daily plant to plant delivery route

Greetings All,
What is the best way to handle the following in IM and WM?
We have a stocking plant that supplies materials to our 30 other locations (all are defined as plants).
We have 6 trucks. Each truck drives the same route each day, and delivers material to 5 plants each.
Currently, material is moved between plants using STO's and paper outbound deliveries.
We would like to develop a RF process to track material from the from the shelf to the truck. Material moves as follows:
STO deliveries print for each plant.
Material is picked and moved to a staging area. There is one staging areas for each of our 30 plants.
Finally, all material for a truck route is moved from the staging area to the physical truck.
How can we do this with RF using as little customization as possible?
From I read and learn about WM, transfer orders for all plants would go into one large predefined staging area (9xx), with no way to verify or track down to the plant or route level.
How do we make sure that the material is correctly placed in each plant's corresponding staging area?
How do we insure that material is moved correctly from staging area to truck?
Thanks!

Any inputs from experts?
Thanks!

671 - movement type - Error update control

Hi,
I have created ew movement type Z71 with reference to 671 movement type for return sto delivery.
We have removed the movement type category 01 from Z71 mvt type, due to this we are not able to do the PGR for return sto deliveries.
While doing PRG system showing error: Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry Z71 X X _ L ).
We have removed that mot.type category for the purpose of updating the RG23D register in Depot, it has been suggested by SAP only. But i don't know the link b/w update control and movement type category.
Please let me know if these is any config for movement type control related.
Thanks&Regards
Lakshmikanth

Hi All,
This is a bug in SAP
SAP has replied with Pilot note. They have given one pilot note to us.
We are going to implimenting in J1IG program for updating the RG23D register with reference to negative post goods issue(material document which is having 671 movement type).
The Pilot note number is 1300928. You can find more details in this note.
We will get back tou you after testing this note.
Regards
Lakshmikanth

PIR IS NOT REDUCED

Hai Gurus,
1) I had created Requirement(PIR) for a fert material through SOP
2) MRP run is done .
3) planned and pur req.created
4) Material GI is done
5) Planned order is converted to process order and Goods issue done using MB1A
6) process order confirmation and goods receipt agianst process order is done.
7) Finished goods is delivered .
8) Finally order is settled.
My question is
A) After following the above all steps , in MDO4 the requirement created by SOP is not reduced from
the stock requirement list( MDO4) against the delivered qty , so once again the requirement is taken into consideration for MRP run, which should
not happen, i dont know where the settings to be done to correct this error.
waiting for the positive reply
Regards,
sekar chand

>
sekar chand wrote:
> Hai Mr proshob and Mario,
>
> Thanks for your valuable reply.
>
> The strategy which i was using is 40 , with 90 days forward and backward as consumption parameters
>
> And delivery is based on STO.
>
> can i change the strategy from 40 from 11, if so whether it will have any impact
>
> waiting for the positive reply.
>
> Regards
> sekar chand
Sekar,
In standard SAP you cannot consume PIR with STO Deliveries related PGI, so changing the requirment type from VSF to BSF or planning strategy from 40 to 11 would not help.
Please look at the option of using BADI- MD_PIR_FLEX_CONS and Method CHECK_PIR_CONS_REDUC to perform your required consumption.
Regards,
Prasobh

Change Pricing for purchase order

Hello All,
FOR STO deliveries, we want to aportionate freight charges in case of multiple POs. Our inbound idoc sends only one order and calls BAPI_PO_CHANGE.
we are trying to update Pricing condition of other related purchase orders belonging to same delivery in a user exit. User exit is SAPL2012. Is there any function module to update Pricing conditions for purchase orders?
BAPI_PO_CHANGE would not work here as this userexit is called in this BAPI.
Any suggestion?

Any suggestiions?

STO deliveries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for