STO process gone bad

Dear Gurus,
Greetings.
We have configured the STO process between Plant 4000 to Plant 4400 and everything was working good. The end user wanted a little more facility, so we went for one step procedure.
SPRO - Materials Management - Purchasing - Purchase Order - Set up Stock Transport Order - Assign Document Type, One-Step Procedure, Underdelivery Tolerance -
Sup PlantRec PlantDoc TypOne StepTolerance
4000---4400UBx--
Well it did not work (of course because of our non configuration and for lack of time), so we wanted to go back to 2 step procedure, we have deleted the above line.
Now the problem we are having is that the previously working 2 step procedure is not working.
STO is getting created with 'Shipping' tab in ME21N and when we do VL10B, system is showing the STO.
When we highlight it and click on Back ground, we are getting the message:
*_See log for information about creating deliveries
Message no. VR547_*
Now when we again highlight the STO line and click on 'Log for Delivery Creation' button, system is giving this error message:
GROUP-NO OF ERRORS-SH POINT---MAX TIME
87340000.00
When i click this line and click on 'Notes' button, system is showing the following messages:
4500000539 000010 Sales area 18 00 is not defined
4500000539 000010 Shipping for sales org. dist. chan. from plant 4000 is not possible
4500000539 000010 Delivery from plant 4000 for material 9 is not possible
Regarding line 1: Sales Area 40001800 is defined and it worked before and is still available in Ent Struc - Assignment - S&D - Set up Sales Areas.
Regarding line 2: Sales Org 4000, Distribution Channel 18 are assigned to Plant 4000 in Ent Struc - Assignment - S&D -
Assign Sales Org - Dist Channel - Plant.
We have maintained the Plant data for both the Plants as follows:
4ooo - No Customer number - Sales Area 4000-18-00
4400 - Customer Number 4400 - Sales Area 4000-18-00.
So why am I getting this fault and what do i do to rectify this situation. Gurus please help as we need to complete this in 2 days time.
Thanks for your support in advance.
With best regards
Venkat - Hyd

Hi Venkat,
you have deleted the entry (SPL PLNT TYPE ....) or you only removed the flag in ONE STEP indicator?
i believe the entry shoul be there but only this indiactor needs to be deflagged.
Regards,
Anubhab

Similar Messages

Freight capitalization for STO process using shipment cost document

Dear MM experts
I have been testing and trying to charge freight to material using transportation module. I know how to do it in simple STO process without SCD (shipment cost document) but I am not able to do it with SCD.
I have searched and tried every link I found on SCN. Unfortunately there are many open threads and non of them is answered or giving complete solution. For example I have tried this link where Ajit Kumar has explained the scenario in detail I am but unable to achieve my result. I have also tried other links and SAP note 427944 as well.
Now what thing confusing me is accounting entries and documents/steps where these accounting entries will be posted.
My current process is like this in plant to plant transfer under same company code
STO > OBD > Shipment Document > PGI > Accouting Entry with 641 movement type. Material account debit and same account credit. > Shipment Cost document > GR with 101 without any accounting entry > Transfer freight cost to FI using Freight Service PO determination > Accounting Entry Freight Outward Expense Debit and Freight Clearing Account Credit > MIRO > Accounting Entry Freight Clearing Debit and Vendor Credit
As you can see we are booking freight as an expense and not charging to material. Now what I want is that freight should be charged to material. If I am sending material from plant P000 to plant P201 under same comapny code then freight charges should be added in material cost in plant P201.
I have done FRB1 condition type with accrual and copy shipment cost tick mark and other stuff suggested in all those threads but it is not working.
My requirement is to understand the points where and what accounting entries will be created as per my new scenario which is same as old one except one difference which is to charge freight to material instead of booking expense in freight service PO.
Lets take an example that material cost price is 100 and freight charges is 50. Now as per old threads at the time of GR against OBD system will create accounting document with 150 debiting the stock in plant P201. What about credit? If we have added freight here then what about 2nd accounting entry in my first scenario in which freight expense is debited and clearing account is credited? Could anyone please explain accounting entries and points where these entries will be posted?
Another thing is that is it only possible with moving average price to charge freight to material or can we do this with standard price as well using some standard or customized solution?
Detailed and easy to understand answer will be highly appreciated.
Thank$

Hi Moazzam ;
Firstly, you can benefit Badi/s in package VTRA which is given belowed.
Secondly , i think that shipping method --> create sto with delivery --> create shipment document and shipment cost document (problem is starting so system will be create PO and service entry sheet automatically , can you try shipment document is non-related with cost document.
Thirdly , you can post invoices charge to material with miro , if you success to direct freight costs to stock account (BSX).
Also , you can benefit doc. sap behaviours for Std price/ Map --> Planned & unplanned delivery costs in mm
I hope , you can manage your process ; for me standart way is the best.
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal

Not able to cancel the Excise invoice for STO process

Hi All,
In STO process, we need to cancel the excise invoice due to some business requirement. When we tried to do the same in J1IH, it is not allowing us to do the same with the error "No item information transferred into Accounting". Tried the same through J1IS with the internal Doc No. Here the error is document is complete.
Please guide how to cancel the same.

Hi,
STO has been created either through MM route or through SD-MM route.
In MM route, the process is as below,
You create PO, followed by MB1B (Transfer posting) , then followed by J1IS (Excise Invoice).
In SD-MM route the process is as below,
You create PO, followed by VL10B , then VF01, then followed by J1IIN (Excise Invoice from Factory).
Normally, when you create Excise Invoice through J1IIN, it is automatically released to Accounting.
In your case, I feel it has not yet been released to accounting and I hope, Excise Invoice has been created through J1IS.
In MM route, you need to release the Excise doc to Accounting.
In that case, you need to go for J1IV and release the same to accounting.
Find out the Internal document number from the Excise Invoice and with the reference of this Internal document number release it to Accounting through t.code J1IV.
Now, once it is released to accounting, you should be able to cancel it through J1IH or J1IS.
Please let me know if any further problem you are facing.
Regards
Pradyumna

In STO process , PGI to be made mandatory

I wish to make PGI mandatory for STO process..Steps are as follows:
-Create PO.-.ME23n
-Create Replenishment Delvery -VL10B
-Do PGI -.VL02n>PGI
-Create Proforma Invoice-VF01
-Create Excise -J1iin
In order to achieve that , in VTFL copy control for NL to F8 , I changed Copying Req ( at header) to 003 from 009.
But somehow I am not able to create proforma invoice VF01 ...even after doing PGI.
Message is that there is no delivery related items.

Hi Ramesh
In copy control VTFL for NL->F8, I made the copying requirement at header as '003' ( replacing 009 as was the original).
-Also,as per earlier suggestion, I changed the Copying requirement at Item level ..i.e for NLN to 034 ( replacing 010 as was original).
Next I ran the cycle
a) Created a PO. ..ME21n
b) Created replenishment delivery .VL10B
c)Picked the Delivery Quantity ..VL02n
d) Tried ..Generating Proforma invoice .of .type F8 .in VF01 . It didn't allow.
This was fine and satisfy my requirement of not being allowed to do invoicing before PGI.
Next ....
e) Did PGI for that delivery.
f) Tried to generate proforma invoice ..type F8 . But the system is not allowing me to do so.
Processing status-Incorrect.
Error log..The document is not relevant for invoicing.
What is the way out?
(As a fyi..without the changes I did in copy control, I was able to generate Proforma invoice after PGI.earlier)

Restricting for creating the Billing Document without PGI in STO Process

We want to restrict creating the Billing Document without PGI in STO Process
Delivery Type:NL
Item cataogory:NLN
Billing Type: JEX Profroma Invoice
I have check in VTFL
At Header Level, Routine - 003. for normal sales process LF-F2
At Item Level , Routine - 004
in VTFL-- NL-JEX
At Header Level, Routine - 009.
At Item Level , Routine - 010. here when i changed to 003 and 004 for NL and JEX
i am getting error after PGI when i am doing vf01 error is coming " document is not relevant for Billing"

Hi
Kindly do the belwo
1. goto the t code VOV7 item category determination and select the item category and put the billing relevance as "A"
2. once the step 1 is completed then it will show the billing relevant status AS "A"in the delivery documnt at the item level
The above configuration will be applicable in the new documents only
Regards
Damu

Maintain vendor for excise invoice -STO process??

Hi,
Still facing problem in Same issue so...
I am doing Stock transfer from plant to plant in same company code.
i have maintain all the information in the Excise TAB of migo but still face the following errors.
Error is "Maintain Vendor for the excise invoice. (Message No 4F185) ...????"
In STO process, vendor it won't come in the picture ??Becas , once we create purchase order with UB document type , it 'll ask for only supplying plant not for vendor .
So what might be the problem and how to locate it , trouble shoot the same .???
Thanks in advance
SAP-MM

hi
check following
goto Xk02
give ur vendor ( plant assigned to)
then goto PURCHASING TAB
here in menu EXTRAS>ADD URCHASING DATA
here u can find field for plant
just check and revert back
regards
kunal

Has my M1424WR router "gone bad"? - and its replacement "bad" out of the box?

I've had Verizon FiOS service for about 3 years now, and have had very few problems with it. A few times I lost internet or TV during storms when lines came down somewhere, but that's about it.
The FiOS installer gave me an Actiontec M1424WR router and access port, with a coax connection to the outside box. I have a multi-room DVR setup (2 DVRs that can "see" each other, and a third read-only STB), so as I understand it I have to use the Actiontec (good bye to my old Linksys router used with my high speed cable service).
I have 4 computers attached directly to the router and up to 8-10 wireless devices (cell phones, tablets, wireless printer, gaming devices, streaming media players, etc.) on my home network. As such, I reset the router's SSID to the same one I had before, with 128-bit WEP security (a 16 char hex key). I also am "advanced" enough to know how to go through the advanced settings and start the DHCP address allocation to start at 192.168.1.100 to allow several of my devices (network storage drive, wireless printer, gaming systems, etc.) to maintain locally static IP addresses like 192.168.1.3 through 192.168.1.9 that reconnect when the router is reset or rebooted.
All this worked beautifully for about 3 years, until last week. The wireless network started dropping out - not just external internet access, but seeing other hosts in the home network - requiring a router reset to come back (or just a disable/re-enable of wireless service via the router settings at http://192.168.1.1). However, the "Wireless" light on the router remains green.
Even the wired internet connection (the computer hooked up with an Ethernet cable, right next to the router) would lose its internet connection for 5-10 seconds at a time before resuming. The multi-room DVR functionality would get spotty, too - until a reset, boxes couldn't see each other, playing back data from another box would be very slow or not come up at all.
After 4 goes of it with Verizon support via chat and phone (the experience of which I won't go into), which included a remote reset of my external access box by Verizon, I concluded that the router must have gone bad.
Last night, I went in person to a Verizon service station near me to swap the router, got back what they said was a "brand new" M1424WR, and installed it... To get the same problem, actually worse. The wireless drops out in about 5 minutes, the light is still green but no wireless hosts can ping each other or anything on the wider internet (like using Speedtest). I can use my wired internet fine (no hiccups there, yet) but my multi-room DVR is not 100%, two boxes can see the other two but one of the DVRs can only see itself.
It seems unlikely but I have to believe this is still a problem with the router box itself, and I just got yet another flaky one back, right? Nothing in my home network has changed (no new devices, services added, firmware updates, etc.) from last Tuesday when it was fine.
Any other ideas for me to try?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Well, I traced it to a "radio problem" with a client device. It was a "Belkin F5D7330 802.11g Wireless Ethernet/Gaming Adapter" I was using to connect a network printer that has only an ethernet port to my wireless network (so I wouldn't have to run CAT5 cable to where the printer is situated).
To do this I had to remove/disable ALL my wireless devices and computers, then add them back in one by one... It was frustrating because I'd forgotten that printer was actually connected wirelessly, I was used to thinking of it as connected via an ethernet cable since I "knew" that's what the printer supported. I even unplugged my 2.4 GHz wireless phone base, which I actually believed to be the culprit. I only remembered the printer's wireless adapter after everything else was removed.
But once I unplugged the Belkin's power, boom, my wireless network was back to normal! And plugging it back in caused the problem again. So it's bye-bye Belkin.

STO Process Scenario

Hi Guru's,
It is a STO process, I have 2 plantS MKTO and MPTO, MKTO acts as a Warehouse and MPTO acts as manufacturing plant, Materials in MKTO are Re-order point planning, when ever stock is below re-order point and when we run MD02, it creates a Pur.Req in MKTO and a planned order in MPTO.
where can i find the relation between Pur.Req and Planned order, please guide me.
I can find relationship in MD09 but it showing as structure, can you please guide me where it will store.
Thanks
Satya

Hi
You cannot find the planned order and purchase requisition link in table level also.
once the planned order is converted to purchase requisition you cannot view the planned order in MD13.
the only thing u can check is whether the Pur req is created by MRP/Converted from Plnd order,etc using creation indicator in contact person tab of purchase requisition.
Regards
S.Senthil

CIN: Return STO process

Hi All,
I have the scenario regarding to Return STO process.
Step1: Creating the return STO process.
Step2: Negative goods receipt through MIGO. The movement type is 161.
Step3: Creating delivery through VL10B. When iam doing the Post goods receipt (Negative post goods issue) through VL02N iam getting below error.
Error: Purchase Order XXXX does not contain items for a stock transfer
CIN related issue: How to handle the CIN ACTIVITIES. What transactions we have to use for updating or adjusting the Cenvat accounts. And what documents we have to use as references.
Please help me to solve these issues.
Thank you
Regards
Lakshmikanth

Hi All,
Any ideas please?
Regards
Lakshmikanth

In STO process, am getting error in GR"Maintain vendor for Excise invoice "

Hello
In STO process(MM route) I have prepared excise invoice by J1IS. While preparation of J1IS i have enterd customer(recieving plant as customer).I have also mainatin the the supplying plant as vendor in J1ID. But when i am trying to capture the excise invoice at recieving plant during GR am getting error "Maintain vendor for Excise invoice "
Kindly suggest
Regards
Manish

dear sir
please check in customer master record , in control Data tab, vendor master assigned .
if not assigned the vendor master in customer master.
regards
jrp

Error in Return STO Process(Plant to Plant within company code)

Hi All,
I am doing the return STO Process(Plant to Plant within same company code) .
Scenario:
STO from Plant 1300 to 1400
STO Process: ME21N->VL10B->PGI-> VF01(Proforma)->MIGO
Return STO from Plant 1400 to 1300
STO Return Process: ME21N(item with return indicator)->MB01(MT 101 w.r.t Return STO PO)->VL10B->PGR(Error)
It is giving me the following error.
Deficit of PU GR quantity 5 KG : 20027183 1330 2000 16
Message no. M7021
Kindly help me
with regards
Azeez.Mohd

Dear,
   Please go through this link,
    [Deficit of PL Stock in transfer 10 EA : 100100051 IBM2;
    [Accept material in MIRO without any limitation?;
    [migo-return delivery-credit memo;
Regards,
Sandip

VPRS cost during STO process

Dear All,
In STO process, the pricing procedure is having the condition type VPRS. My doubt is whether the VPRS will pick-up the Moving Average price or Std.Price? Because the Material Master is having both the price.
How to instruct the system to pick-up the price, which we want to capture? For example if we want the system to pick-up only the Std.Price for particular material and Moving Avg.Price for some other material.
Thank you
Regards
Manivannan R

HI Mani,
Futher to lakshmana, i want to add, the system will pick up the price which have given in the peice control. say if you give std price it will pick up that std.price or if u give MAP it will pick the MAP, but in M.master only for standard price the system will maintain Moving averege price also.
hope this will clear ur doubt
Reward if usefull.
Nagarajan

One Step STO process

Hello All,
I wanted to know the logic regarding one step STO process.
while doing Post goods Issue :
1) system posts the 645 mvt type (which is maintained in schedule line category NC)
But i am unable to understand how system is triggering the 101 mvt type?
Please Suggest on this...... is it a SAP standard code which is calling the 101 mvt type or any settings in SPRO ?
regards,
sujit

Hi
its sap standard
645 Goods issue for a cross-company stock transport order in one step (Shipping)
a goods receipt line is generated automatically for 101
You post the stock withdrawal in the issuing plant and the receipt into stock at the receiving plant simultaneously. One material document is created
Regards
kailas Ugale

My 13" early 2011 macbook pro is having trouble connecting back to internet after going to sleep. before updating to EFI 2.7 it was perfect now after updating its gone bad

My 13" early 2011 macbook pro is having trouble connecting back to internet after going to sleep. before updating to EFI 2.7 it was perfect now after updating its gone bad.

Same issue here too. I will try reinstalling the firmware update. This has happend to me twice. The only way to correct the issue was to reboot.
Thanks!

Can Apple replace my macbook pro (mid 2012) retina's battery if I think that the battery health has gone bad/in need of and renewal?

Can Apple replace my macbook pro (mid 2012) retina's battery if I think that the battery health has gone bad/in need of and renewal???
I've had my Macbook for about 11 months now and i use it every day; its gone though about 420 cycles of charging and using the power, and i noticed the battrey preformance has decreased (as expected). The problem isn't sevear yet but it would comfort me knowing that i could replace the battery in the near future
Please contact me or answer the question if you know anything about this!

Exitio\'s Apple wrote:
Can Apple replace my macbook pro (mid 2012) retina's battery if I think that the battery health has gone bad/in need of and renewal???
No only if they think under warranty/AppleCare, but your likely able to pay for a new battery if they have them, which they might not yet since it's such a new machine still.
BTW, I have a Early 2011 17" MBP, 27 months old, charges to 97% and has only 14 cycles.

STO process gone bad

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for