Stock directly post to block instead of unrestricted while doing MIGO with out quality inspection

Dear Friends,
we are facing this problem from last one month on wards regarding we don't have inspection set for F-30 part number for these F-30 part numbers while we are doing MIGO 101 Movement type in MIGO Screen it is showing as unrestricted when i click on post button system automatically post the stock in to Block automatically in that MIGO Screen also it will automatically change from unrestricted to Block. why it is happens like this please guide me is there any configuration for this
Regards,
Venkat.

Interesting.. you now mention Quality certificate which you didn't earlier.
Do you have QM in procurement active?
If you specified a certificate type in the "QM in procurement" set up in the material master, then yes.. this can cause the material to go to blocked stock.
In config, for the certificate type, is a field called "Control without Certif." Depending on what you selected here, the material could be posted to blocked stock. You might have selected a value of A,B or E. (those are the keys for the field). Those three will post the material to blocked stock if no cert is received. You can change that setting W for warning.
Craig

Similar Messages

REG: while doing PGI with ref to OBD should pick stock from one location

Hi experts ,
I have a n issue while doing PGI with ref to OBD.
1.We are purchasing Raw material Aluminium circle 1000 nos from "X" vendor & keeping stock in Main stores i.e 0001 location plant-1.
2.From there we are issuing to production line i.e 0003 location(Plant 1)500 nos.
4.Remaining stock of 500 nos is in 0001 location in under some Batches.
5.Meanwhile we are suppose to transfer the aluminium circle to plant 2 .
6.For this we are raising STO for aluminium circles 600 nos to Plant 2.
7.With ref to STO we are raising OBD for Plant 2.
8.With ref to OBD While doing PGI it should picks the stock from 0001(Main Stores) location only.
9.But the STO qty is 600 nos ,availablity of stock in 0001 is 500 nos only .
10.While PGI it takes 500 nos from 0001 location & remaining 100 nos picking from Production line 0003.It should not pick from Production line 0003 location .
11.For this system should not allow to pick from 0003 location & also system should throw error message "Deficit of QTY in 0001 location"for 100 nos.
KIndly suggest me asap.
Thanks in advance
vichu
Edited by: viswanathan seenuvasan on Dec 10, 2009 7:01 AM

Hi,
As I understand the picking is done automatically in outbound delivery. Am I right?
a)
If picking is not done automatically but manually, why the user defines the production storage location in the OBD? In this case some training would be necessary....
b)
If it is done automatically: which settings are you using? Batch determination only?
1. In stock determination (SPRO > MM > IM > Stock determination > Define strategies for Stock Determination) you can define which storsage location should be used by system, and you can assign the stock determination rule to the applications (SPRO > MM > IM > Stock determination > Assign Stock determination Rule in the Applications)
(you also have to assign the stock determination group to the material master (MARC-EPRIO))
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/d8/2f3746996611d1b5480000e82de955/frameset.htm
2. You have to use batch determination
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/25/283aac4f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/frameset.htm
3. You have to use availability check in delivery not to ship out goods for which reservation already exists (if goods are in production storage location I assume you have a PrdOrd...)
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/93/744cd9546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
I haven't tries this but I assume it should work...
Please check SAP online help.
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 1, 2010 11:02 AM
Forget stock determination. Instead of it you should use picking location determination - suggested by Laksmipathi. It wokrks fine with batch determination.
SPRO > LE > Shipping > Picking > Determine Picking Location > Assign Picking Location
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 1, 2010 5:03 PM

How to block post price conditions in purchase order after doing MIGO

I need to block post price conditions in the purchase order, after doing MIGO.
The problem is that somtimes buyers people go to the purachse order with ME22N, even if MIGO has already been made for this purachse order. They change The amount of certain price conditions in some or all the posts of the purchase. when people of accounting receive the invoice, there are problems of price differences.
i need help to do it
Thank you in advance for your help

The system will not allow to change the price once goods receipt takes place on that particular order. It happens only when we reverse the reciepts and make the po open. In such case the persons can change with ME22N. Its simple that only authorised user to have this transaction code and other users should not have this transaction code authorization.

Connecting directly from ECC 6.0 to a 3rd party system with out XI ?

Hi Guys,
we have developed soap-soap scenarios in XI and we are sending the data from ECC 6.0 -> XI ->3rd party webbased system.
Due to some security reasons we are looking for options of doing the same with out XI ie directly from ECC 6.0 to 3rd party system.
can somebody explain or provide the links for doing the direct connection and also suggest the advantages and disadvantages of eliminating XI completly from the design
any hep would be really appreciated
Thanks,
Srini

HI,
Yes, using standard Enterprise services from SAP you can communicate with 3rd party systems also,
Even you can configure the HTTPS communication with R/3 to 3rd Party system. For this you need to install the client Certificates and have to use valid User ID and Passwords.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/3a/7cddde33ff05cae10000000a128c20/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/e8/1f1041a0f6f16fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Disadvantage of communication without XI
1. XI provides the re-usability concept. i.e. if you have just R/3 to 3rd party and tomorrow you may need to add another 3rd party or sap system to communicate, then you just re-use the existing scenario.
But in case of direct communication is leads to point-to-point connection.
2. R/3 can't directly support to the open Standards, either you have to use ABAP proxies or RFCs to convert it to XML format. But XI is an Centralized Integration Platform with Open Standard. In current world, Openness is important.
3. XI has the Ability to communicate with other messaging systems/products may be JMS or any other 3rd party systems also which has the limitations with direct communication
4. Complex processes for communication possible instead of only sending and receiving (business process management) (connect e.g. asynchronous and synchronous steps, define complex communication scenarios)
Mapping etc possible to accomplish in Java. Platform independent Java components.
5. XI has Java & .Net support. which is not possible with directly R/3
Thanks
Swarup

Getting serial number box while transfer post in MB1A but not while doing MIGO

Hi Team
I am getting serial number box while transfer post in MB1A.
But getting below error under serial number tab while doing GR through MIGO of outbound delivery.
Issuing plant and receiving plant, material, batch, qty are same in both cases.
How can I get serial number box when doing GR? Does any customizing changes needed?
Br, Kiran U

Movement type is different for those two screen shots, also you are saying you are using MB1A, but you are using 301 movement type. Generally 301 movement type is not allowed from MB1A t-code.
Please check these SAP notes if relevant for your case.
856548 - MIGO: you cannot enter serial numbers
856662 - T156Q: Missing entries

No posting rules exist for account key while doing purchae order.

Hi SAP Expert,
I have following problem while doing purchae order.
No posting rules exist for account key
Message no. FF714
Diagnosis
No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
Please give me reply.
Thanks in advance,
Yogesh.

check MM pricing procedure for any condition account key is assigned and for that account key, no GL is configured in OBYC, if it is related to tax condition type OB40.
regs,
ramesh b

How to post goods to unrestricted while doing usage decession in QA32

Hi Gurus,
FG1 - finished
SFG - Semi finished
RM1 - raw material
now i am doing inprocess inspection for SFG, I selected inspection lot in QA32 and clicked Results then i selected usage decession now i want to post this to unrestricted stock and then again i issued them for FG1.
now when i saw in MMBE of SFG, i got that quantity 10 is in Reservation.
please guide me how to post them to unrestricted stock
please respond immediatley
regards
venkat

Hi YM Reddy, Thanks for responding.
for SFG its ok, then what about FG1 i activated 04 inspection type for FG1 in QM View in Material Master of FG1.
i done converssion of Planned order to Prduction Order, then released and confirmed also.
But i had not done GR
I gone to inspection lot selection QA32 but i am not finding any lot of FG1 there.
please guide me what the mistake i am doing while posting GR.
Regards
Venkat

Blocking a particular vendor for doing Migo in his account

Dear Guru's
My question is that is it possible to block a vendor so that no transaction can be done in his vendor account number. For example in our senario duplicate vendor number has been created for a particular vendor number and now i want to block one account so as nobody can do MIGO,MIRO or any payment in his account is it possible. I have tried with XK05 total block but it is not working . Problem is that before blocking many PO of that vendor is standing and they are reciving the material from that Po and system is allowing it to do so.
Therefore i want to block the vendor so that no transaction can be done in his account. Kindly help me out

Hi.
I am Basically MM guy. To resolve this issue I would like to suggest a work around.
You can use the two payment terms.
1) One payment term in the company code (In vendor master record in the Payment transaction accounting). In this payment term you have set a payment block indicator
By doing this system will block all the invoices or Down payment which are posted in FI. Against this vendor. Hence system will not allow you to pay to this vendor against down payment.
2) Another payment terms in the purchasing view of the Vendor master. In this payment terms do not set any block.
When you post an invoice against a PO your accounting document will not be blocked.
Hence you can pay to a vendor with reference to PO invoice.
I am not sure. I hope it will work. If it helps award me.
Cheers
Umakanth

Blocking of Confirmed quantity while doing ATP

Hi,
While carrying out availability check in sales order( VA01) the quantifies are confirmed if availability check is set at schedule line and rest of the relevant setting of requirement planning.
The blocked quantities after carrying our availability check impacts good number of tables and field in SAP.
If the stock is blocked at the time of creation of order or at the time of saving the sales order, how tough or easy is to change the tables and program to calculates the material availability data in the system.
If you can specify the program and when it is determined,pls provide input.
regards

it will check Un-Restricted stock of MATNR+WERKS, so check MARC with these details.
That u have to DEBUG
Message was edited by:
Prabhu Peram

Why can version 3.16.6 have problems displaying more than nine posts in a forum thread when IE7 does so with ease?

In a forum that I have been using for the last several years, I posted a problem. When I tried to reply to post #9 in that thread, my post would not appear. I tried again and still my post did not appear.
I then opened IE7, navigated to that forum and thread. IE7 displayed all 13 posts.
I have no problems adding to long threads in other forums. If it helps you, I am including a link to the thread I'm having problems with.
http://www.bt3central.com/showthread.php?t=53395

The slowness may be caused by background processing after the library update. Are you shooting RAW?
Also, where is your iPhoto library stored? In your Pictures folder or on an external drive?
How much free storage do you have on your system drive
3. Finally when my old folders, books and contents of my old photo gallery appears in the left side of the application I have access to no photo and the program remains as it were unresponsive.
You may need to repair your iPhoto Library.
Run the iPhoto library first aid tools and use the options "Repair permissions" and "Repair database".
To launch the "First Aid Tools" hold down the options-command keys while double clicking your iPhoto Library.
Then select "Repair Database". Repeat with "Repair Permissions". If this does not help, back up your iPhoto Library and use the option "rebuild".

Problem while doing GR with Posting periods

I am New to SAP..
When I am doing GR the system is throughing an error as under:
"Posting only possible in periods 2007/03 and 2007/02 in company code XXXX"
When I am try to close the period by MMPV it is not allowing me to do the same. And it is showing as under:
"The company code XXXX can no longer be initialized"
I did the following
SPRO --> Logistics - General --> Material Master --> Basic Settings --> Maintain Company Codes for Materials Management
where in for my company code XXXX
Year is 2007
period is 3
when I try to change the period to 4 it is again showing the message as :
"The company code XXXX can no longer be initialized"
Wher can I initialize my company code?
Can any body help me in this regard..
Thanks in advance..
Vam C

Hi Biju
I used OB52 and created variance and assigned to company code...but..
My problem not solved...same error occuring..
Can you suggest some solution..?
Hi Dipak,
I tried MMPV also..
It is giving the following error:
Follow the instructions in Note 487381 before initialization..
Can you suggest some solution..?
Thanks in advance,
Vam C

Higher education cess not posted while doing migo

Hi,
When I do goods receipt(MIGO) higher education cess is not posted to financial accounting. I am using taxinn.
I face same problem when i do excise invoice capturing for billing document. Balance in transaction currency.
rang

HI,
There is no relation ship between your tax procedure (eg: TAXINN) and withholding tax confirguration. Please check the does the higher education cess is getting posted or not when you post FI invoice. If it's fine, it should post when you do MIRO.
Withholding tax will not be posted when you do MIGO, it will be posted when you do MIRO only.
Please use the same vendor for FI & MM invoices posting. If still there is any issue in higher education cess posting - please check withholding tax configuration.
Regards,
Kiran Yelamarthy

TS2755 is there a way to block texts from specific numbers to imessage with out turning imessage off?

is there any way to block text from specific numbers to imessage without turning imessage off?

Go to Settings > Messages > Send & Receive > You can be reached by iMessage at:
Select the right facing arrow in a blue circle next to the email address this girl is sending iMessage to and select Remove This Email.
If she has your cell phone number, she can switch to sending iMessage to that and there will be nothing you can do, but removing the email address will prevent you from receiving an iMessage addressed to that email address.

Quality inspection stock payment block

Hi All,
I want to block the payment for the materials which comes to quality inspection stock in MIGO as I have maintained in Material Master purchasing view post to quality inspection tick.
I want payment to the vendor only after the stock goes from quality to unrestricted use .Is there any way achieving it ?
Regards
Abhijit Das

Dear,
Please try this in transaction OQB1 and Change the QM control key used in the QM view for the material.
Or use SPRO > Quality Management > QM in Logistics > QM in procurement > Define Control key path.
In the details of the key, set the Invoice Block indicator as well as whether it should be a warning message or an error message.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Posting Block in Quality Inspection Material

I have one requirement in QM Module as my client wants to Block the payment for the Materials which are under Quality Inspection as there are several materials got paid without Quality Clearance.
I have changed Control key 0007 - Invoice Block, Message Code- Warning.
Can there be any setting which will throw the message that material is under Inspection.
Please advice on SOS basis.
Rgds,
Pradeep

Thanks for reply but my client wants to Block the payment for the Materials which are under Quality Inspection as there are several materials got paid without Quality Clearance.
I have changed Control key 0007 - Invoice Block, Message Code- Warning.
Can there be any setting which will throw the message that material is under Inspection.

Stock directly post to block instead of unrestricted while doing MIGO with out quality inspection

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for