Stock Issue/Receipt Values in 0IC_C03 not matchin with MC.9

Hi Experts,
We are facing a certain mismatch problem in our Inventory Cube
(0IC_C03) stock issue and receipt values. They are showing a huge
difference with the issue and receipt values in ECC Report MC.9.
Also please note that the Quantities in the cube are matching exactly
with MC.9 but not values.
On further search , we also noted that the Plant wise Values and
quantities in BW are exactly matching with certain infostructures
(S031, S033) but not with MC.9 in ECC Production.
Can anyone please let us know how can we check the plant wise
issue/Receipt values  ?
Also, We replicated the same senario in Quality system and did an
inventory
cube Reload . But it still showed the same discrepencies from MC.9 for the given material and period.
Regards

Dear AL,
There is not failed request and the cube, and the loading is correct.
Also we replicated the same on Quality, and did a complete Reload for the cube and it still gave the same difference.
Kindly let me know how can we check the issue and recept values from PSA of Revaluations Extractor??
Dear Shashank,
We are using standard logistics extractor 2LIS_03_UM for the cube.
Along with 2LIS_03_BX & 2LIS_03_BF.
Regards,
Edited by: BhaminiJ on Aug 3, 2011 1:33 PM

Similar Messages

  • I have a Blackberry 8330 and a MacBook. For some reason I started having connectivity issues. The handheld will not sync with the computer via pocketmac. I have uninstalled, etc 15 times. Please help

    I have a Blackberry 8330 and a MacBook. For some reason I started having connectivity issues. The handheld will not sync with the computer via pocketmac. I have uninstalled, etc 15 times. Please help

    Hi Peter!
    I'm sorry to read that you are having issues with your Sync account.
    Your best bet is to follow the steps described in this blogposts and open a bug:
    https://philikon.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/how-to-file-a-good-sync-bug/
    After that, if you don't want to user Sync in your computer, you can stop it with this simple steps:
    * At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Firefox button (Tools menu in Windows XP) and then click Options.
    * Once the options window opens, click on the Sync tab.
    * At the bottom of the Sync tab click on '''Deactivate this Device''' link

  • How do I change the background colour on notes. I need a darker background due to a visual issue. Apple has now discriminated those with visual issues.  I am so not happy with many of the new changes because of this.

    I am so not happy with the new changes especially when it come to the ability to change background colours, fonts and font sizes/ colours... Does Apple really think that their only audience is the young cool crowd or people who do not have a visual impairment.  Think before you make changes to your software and programs.  You WILL lose more people to androids if you continue this way.
    At least give users the ability to make apps like notes their owned by allowing them to pick the style, theme, background and colour, font size and colour. 
    A very ****** off Apple user who is now looking at Androids.

    Hi Tricia,
    I'm sorry but I don't see an ideal way to do this. Is it the yellow label text, e.g:  "New" against the white background which is causing the difficulty?
    The only way I've found of getting the colors to change in Notes is via Settings>General>Accessibility>Invert Colors but then it looks like something has barfed all over your screen.
    I'd be very, very surprised if Apple do not fix this, firstly because I believe "Accessibility" is a legal matter and secondly because they will not want to cause difficulty for their customers.  We have to remember that this is a major, major overhaul of iOS, it has essentially been taken back to the drawing board and done from scratch again, it may take a little time, but I'm sure they will fix these issues.
    Regards,
    Steve

  • Values in CK13N not matching with cost element report

    Dear SAP Experts, when I go to t code CK13N in the column (Itemization of column) I can see for the cost elemnt total values as 241023 with the Qty as 10000, but when I check in the material & the report FBL3N not sure from where its taking 241023. When I run the FBL3N report do I have enter any specific dates to match the entires.
    Thanks in adv for your reply

    Dear Sachin
    CK13N is dependent on your  costing lot size where as in FBL3N you see the actual expenses posted to GLs so there is no match. For example in ck13n for labour charges you may be having a value of Rs 100000/- for 10000 qty lot size where as actually Rs 80000/- or 120000/- are booked for labour charges. then you will see 100000/-in CK13N whereas in FBL3N you will see 80000/- or 120000/- as the case may be.
    Means One is actual booking and the other is estimated figure for a certain costing lot size.
    Hope this clears your doubt.
    Regards
    Rajneesh Saxena

  • IOS 5.1 Update Issue: Contacts exist, but do not appear with incoming call or text

    Alrighty; I just purchased the iPhone 4s and last night was prompted to upgrade to IOS 5.1.  After doing so, I noticed today any incoming calls from one of my contacts would not display the name (the number was displayed as if it was an unknown call).  However, text messages displayed contact information.  I was playing around with it and based on suggestions elsewhere I added a '1' before some numbers.  Upon doing this, an incoming call would display the name of the caller but incoming texts would not. A call to support directed me to call Verizon (my carrier) for 'some sort of three digit code' which would correct the issue; alas, Verizon had no clue.  I'm at a loss and any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

    Is this forum only for the US? Maybe I'm intruding here by posting this?
    Not only the Verizon version unfortunately. We have the same problem here in some parts of the Middle East. I have heard reports from Kuwait and Bahrain, and I'm located in Oman and the problem exists here as well. And no solution except downgrading the phone back to iOS 4.3.5.

  • Property Editor not registered with the PropertyEditorManager

    I´m trying to integrate a fully working jsf 1.1 application into JBoss 4.2.2 which uses jsf 1.2 which isn´t that compatible at all.
    I just have one implementation of the jsf-libs and not any in the application war.
    "ERROR [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[localhost].[samigo].[jsp]] Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
    org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to convert string "#{authorFrontDoorMessages.auth_front_door}" to class "javax.el.ValueExpression" for attribute "value": Property Editor not registered with the PropertyEditorManager".
    And yes, i have been searching a lot on google and read a lot of the article and forum threads but i haven´t been able to solve this.
    I have been struggling with this problem more than a week now, so please give me a tip on what the problem might be.
    Any idea?

    You shouldn't have any appserver specific libraries in WEB-INF/lib (covered by the webapp's default classpath). Further on the appserver/lib (covered by the appserver's default classpath) should only contain appserver specific libraries and at highest 3rd party libraries which are going to be shared among all webapps. Finally you should NOT have added or modified anything in the jdk/lib (covered by the runtime's default classpath).
    So in case of a default and unmodified environment everything should just work flawlessly. In your specific case it seems that you've unnecessarily added/copied appserver specific libraries in the WEB-INF/lib or that you have duplicated EL libraries from (another) appserver in the appserver/lib or maybe -more worse- in the jdk/lib.

  • HP G62 Will Not Boot With Power Cord Plugged In

    I have an HP G62 laptop that is about four years old. I've had a couple of problems with it before that were resolved relatively satisfactorily, however five or six months ago I started having a new issue. The laptop will not boot with the charging cord plugged in, whether there is a battery in it or not. Nor will it return from sleep mode (screen black, status light on the power button flashing) with the charging cord plugged in, whether there is a battery in it or not. It simply shuts down and I end up with an error screen the next time I boot up. I have tried other charging cords and it has been the same, however the cord will still charge the battery. This means I have to charge the battery, unplug the cord, boot up the computer. This annoyance is worsened by the fact that the battery  is old and unable to  hold charge for very long at all and I fear one day even the battery won't be enough to boot the computer.Can I fix the power cord issue? Should I buy a new battery? Or let my computer give up the ghost and scrounge for a new one? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    the charger input could possibly need replaced and/or the charger

  • Ultrabase (42X4963) not compatible with ultrabay slim (42T2545)

    Hi,
    I have an ultrabase 42X4963 that is meant to be used with my X200.
    From the MIGR-7029, clearly shows that 42T2545 is compatible with the ultrabase.
    Problem is that, the Ultrabay slim drive does not fit nicely into the ultrabay. Small portion of it is potruded out.
    Also it is not able to detect the ultrabay slim.
    Anyone face the same issue?

    no they are not compatible with each other. The ultrabase for the X200 is totally different to the one used in the X6x machines, the size are different too. The optical drive connector has changed from the PATA to SATA format. 
    Regards,
    Jin Li
    May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
    I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

  • Is the Nike  Running app not compatible with ios7?

    I downloaded the Nike+ Running app - but I can't get it to open?
    Anyone else having a similar issue?  Is the app not compatible with ios7?

    Go back to the itunes store and look at the user ratings/comments for that app.  If it's not compatible with IOS 7, there will be many postings from users that indicate that.

  • Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3

    Dear Friends,
    we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
    We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
    We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
    The sequence we followed as:
    IN R/3
    Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
    Stock intialization
    Material Movements
    Evaluations
    IN BW
    We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
    2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
    2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
    2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
    When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
    But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
    We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
    Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
    Please help us with your inputs.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Soujanya

    Hi Sudheer,
    No We haven't implemented this note.
    In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
    INSERT BEGIN
      loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
        if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
           DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
          delete DATA_PACKAGE.
        endif.
      endloop.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0.
    INSERT END
    We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
    ==========================================================
    Notes:
    However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
    1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
    2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
       1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
       2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
    3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
    4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
    -> material consumption value:
    IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100'   "Other Issues
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101'   "Returns / Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104'   "Material Transfer
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
                                                "Transfers
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
    ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000'   "Other Receipts
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001'   "Goods Receipt/Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004'   "Material Transfer/"Receipt
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
                                                "Transfer
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
      ELSE.
    if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
        RETURNCODE = 4.
      ENDIF.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0..
    -> material consumption quantity:
    The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    -> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
    5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
    =======================================================

  • Valuated stock value ( 0VALSTCKVAL ) - 0IC_C03

    Hi,
    The std  non cumulative keyfig valuated stock value ( 0VALSTCKVAL ) of Inventory cube 0IC_C03 has exception aggr. as 'LAST VALUE'  with ref char as 0calday.  Could somebody throw light on the calculation of this keyfig?  The query sometimes shows the value as the diff of Issue value & Receipt value but sometimes I'm not able to derive the value that comes up in the query..
    This is really urgent. All help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Ritu

    Hi Vijay & Jaspreet,
    Sorry for the delay in replying.. was stuck with something else. Thanks for your explanations. But still the keyfig 0VALSTCKVAL  is not consistent with the logic.  For some materials, it calculates correctly. But for some I'm not able to figure out the calculation based on the 0IC_C03 records ( based on Issueval & Receipt values).
    One e.g. is shown below:
    Plant  Material                        CalDay       Curr      <b>0ISSVS_VAL   </b> <b>0RECVS_VAL</b>
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/27/2006  USD        6.12       0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/26/2006  USD     1.02     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/25/2006  USD     88.40     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/22/2006  USD     0.34     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/21/2006  USD     1.19     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/20/2006  USD     0.85     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/17/2006  USD     1.53     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/16/2006  USD     2.55     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/15/2006  USD     2.04     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/14/2006  USD     12.24     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     03/13/2006  USD     9.35     0.00
    12T1  000000100000000016     02/24/2006  USD     0.00     331.67
                                                                      sum      125.63     331.67
    The Query shows the values as shown below :
    Value of Valuated Stock      Receipt Value, Valuated Stock    Issue Value, Valuated Stock
    $ 242.40                                   $ 331.67                                    $ 125.63
    I'm just wondering how the 242.40 came up...
    Your input will be highly appreciated..
    Thanks,
    Ritu

  • Problem in receipt stock & Issue stock

    Dear All,
    I have some problem in inventory cube 0IC_C03. when we execute query for total stock ,total Receipt stock &Total issue stock, we found that total stock is matching with MB5B but issue stock & receipt stock is not matching. Then I added material doc no. & movement type in cube 0IC_C03 and checked query material doc no. wise & movement type wise. I found that some material docs no are not coming in MB5B which are for stock transfer. & some movement type such as 310,202,602,552 (which are reverse of 309,201,601,551 Issue stock) is coming in BW for issue stock with negative values in Bex query.But in MB5B these movement types are coming in receipt stock.Therefore total receipt qty and issue qty is not matching with MB5B. Please suggest what restrictions i shuold make in BW so that my query will match with MB5B.
    Thanks in advance,
    regards,
    Yogesh

    Dear Guys,
                    Regards.Even we are stuck up with the same above issue for quite sometime..Would be great if someone could throw light on this...........if possible...
    Manythanks
    arun

  • GL account balance not matching with the total stock value

    Hi,
    The GL account balance is not matching with the total stock value in report RM07MBSTfor stock in transit, Can anyone please let me know, where should, I look into to verify the reason for difference.
    Quick response will be appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards

    I am able to solve this issue. My client has a customized report, which helped me to look into the details of stock in tranisit account. Stock in transit account actually include PPV and TPV alongwith standard cost.

  • GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

    Hi Experts,
    My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
    but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
    I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
    Original invoice document accounting entries:
    GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
    Vendor account: Credited
    during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
    Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
    Vendor account : Debited
    GR/IR Account : Credited
    Consumption Account : Credited
    Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
    these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
    but while cancelling the  GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
    Kindly help in this regards
    Regards
    Mohan

    Hi,
    Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
    I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
    I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
    Could you suggest on this issue.
    Thank you for your cooperation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Maybe you are looking for