Stock Transfer using movement type 309 of in-transit material

Hi Gurus,
We have a scenario where we want to post a 309 movement type on an intransit STO stock (sto is done from PWO, this is done to solve a SOX compliance problem). But it seems that this is not possible as the 309 can not be posted without a s. loc. Is there any alternative to this? Can a two step transfer using 313 and 315 do the trick? Please advise.
Thanks

In real life you cannot do anything to a material that is somewhere on the road, hence it is pretty limited what you can do in SAP.
What exactly do you want to do?

Similar Messages

  • Material to Material Transfer using Movement Type 309

    Hi,
    We have activated the material ledger.
    Issues:
    When we transfer material A to Material B using Movement Type 309 the price difference from Material A was not allocated to Material B after executing CKMLCP.
    But the another company who using the materail to material transfer, the price difference was allocated to receiving material.

    Hi,
    Please check SAP Note 167722 to able to do multi-level price determination for material transfer with using modification.
    best regards, Takashi

  • Transfer posting mov type 309

    Dear friends,
    Please help me in following scenario,
    In MIGO, I want to do transfer posting from one material to another .using mov. type 309.
    My problem is that, my destination material batch number is comming same as sender material batch number. I want system to automatically create new internal batch number for destination material.
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Amit Shirsath

    Dear Madam,
    I have done the same using MB11, but i am not able to do the same with MIGO, and my clients requirement is to do with MIGO only..
    Regards,
    Amit Shirsath

  • Restriction to use mov type 309

    Hi,
    I need to restrict  some of users not to use mov type 309 only, other mov type they need to use, in that case how to do ??
    I knew the object (object name -authorization object is M_MSEG_BWA)  pls tell me the steps?

    Dear Jayakumar,
    While creating the roles using T Code PFCG,after adding the T code MB1B under any role,ask your Basis consultant to look for
    this authorization object M_MSEG_BWA,and dont include the check box for 309 movement and include it for the other
    movement's like 311,312 etc.
    So whatever role that's allowing MB1B should be checked so that it 's not having the authorization for 309 movement.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Stock Transfer by movement type 301 referring STO

    Dear Experts,
    I am unable to generate a stock transfer referring an STO in MB1B or MIGO by movement type 301. I am successfully doing whenever I refer a Reservation. Please advice.
    Regards,,
    Subhro Chakravarty

    Hi,
    i have to ask you to read the SAP Documentation for 'Stock Transfer Using a Stock Transport Order'.
    It is explained there how to post a goods movement for STO.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/4d/2b90dc43ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    br, G

  • Sales Returns Stock posting using movement type 651

    Hi Experts,
    I want to upload the sales returns stock using movement type 651. Because, our existing company code 'xxxx' has been changed to 'zzzz' and all the stocks, balances and so on has been uploaded and carry forwarded to new company code 'zzzz'.
    Now, I stuck with the customer/sales returns stock. Also, I know that there is no accounting effects with the movement type 651 i.e., blocked stock stored in customer rejection storage location.
    I have tried lot but I didn't get the solution for the same.
    Kindly share some ideas to upload the sales returns stock.
    Anandkumar KS

    Dear Experts,
    First of all, sorry for late reply.
    I tried using the movement type 655, but i can't able to post the stock.
    Is there any other way to post the stock in customer rejection storage location with the movement type 655?
    Also, it should not create any Accounting Document while posting the stock.
    Please advice me in this issue.
    Anandkumar KS

  • Error Message when doing a Stock transffer using Mvt Type 309  using MIGO

    Hi Team,
    I am getting an error message M7-441 "Selection by multiple account assignment was not restricted", when doing a stock transfer.
    I am not able to understand the exact issue here, any help is appreciated.
    Regards
    Raj

    M7441 seems to be a new error message which came with EHP4
    I can only see that it is used in MB51 report (do you search for material documents in MIGO when you get this error?)
    according to the coding in my system this is just a warning message, not an error message, hence you could continue by cklicking the okay icon.

  • Quality data for stock uploading using movement type 561

    Hi,
    As system Go-Live business wants to have quality certificate for all FG from SAP. But part of data for quality certificate is of intermediate materials which is already conumed for production of FG so stock is zero for batch of consumed SFG. (ALL FG AND SFG IS BATCH MANAGED). We can upload FG part of quality data require for certificate as FG stock with batch number will be uploaded as initial stock upload with 561 goods movement. But how to manage SFG part of quality data, as stock for consumed batch of SFG will be zero and hence can not have inspection lot for SFG batch.
    Can anyone suggest how to upload quality data for material?
    Help to resolve this issue will be rewarded with points.
    Thanks and regards,
    Devang

    Hai PK,
    For Plant to plant stock transfer, follow the below steps,
    1) create STO in ME21N with Item category U
    2) create delivery document
    3) PGI
    4) create Excise Invoice
    5) create Billing document
    6) GR at receiving plant referring delivery doc. and perform Excise capture simultaneously or separately
    Hope it will helps you..
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kumar

  • Issue with posting change note processing using movement type 309

    while processing Posting change note using transaction LT05, i am getting error 'Available quantity is less than selected quantity'. we need the quantity in posting change note to be picked from same storage bin from where it has been picked during transfer posting using 309. currently, it is showing all storage bins in ascending order for selection while Posting change note posting.
    if we reqwhile mass porcessing of Posting change note using LSMW, it pickes the 1st storage bin. if 1st storage bin quantity is less than selected quantity of PCN then it is showing above error.

    Hi Vishal,
                      The materials are managed by batch? Please check the batches of the material in the different storage bins. SAP asign the storage bin taking into account the material batch number and the oldest quant.
    When the storage bin is not indicated, SAP looks at the batch number, and goes to the storage bin where this batch for the material is allocated. If SAP find more than one storage bin, SAP consumes from the batch that has the oldest quant.
    I really dont understand deeply your question.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Enzo

  • Material to Material transfer with movement type 321

    Dear Experts,
    Material to material transfer with movement type 309, the system create a price difference account if price control "S"
    but we transfer material to material with movement 321 (quality ), no price didderence account is generated, system showing different document
    Exp--- Material "A" with STD price 150
    Material "B" with STD price 100
    document is created
    Material A A/c. Credit 100
    Material B A/c. Dr. 150
    My question is, the price difference where is adjusting, is finance and costing books of account will effect.
    Kindly help to solve the issue
    Thanks & Regards,

    Dear Wasim,
    321 movement is to transfer the stock of a material lying in quality to unrestricted stock.
    It's not used for material to material transfer.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Change the behavior for movement type 309 - Account post PRD

    Dear friends ,
    We need to transfer material to material using movement type 309.
    These material are using price control "S".
    When we transfer from material A to material B the price difference stay stopped in the PRD account.
    We need to revaluate the material B automatically and not let the price difference stopped in the PRD... when we run the Material Costs..via Material ledger.
    Does anyone knows a way to change this behavior ?
    best regards,
    Alessandro

    Dear Revi thanks for your answer !
    One more thing...
    We cannot change the valuation from S to V in the material B.
    Regarding the PRD postings... when the Controlling team runs the Material Ledger the price for material B should be changed/updated automatically, Am I right ?
    And then the PRD account must be cleared...
    Or I continue to do the MR22 manuall...or better... create an Abap program to run automatically clearing the PRD posting agains't the material via MR22 to correct the cost of this material.
    thanks once more.
    Ale

  • Limiting users to select articles from movement type 309- SAP retail

    Hi experts,
    My client wants to restriction on limiting users selecting articles from movement type 309 in SAP retail. They need an option to predefine article list which can allows users to transfer articles using movement type 309. Is any standard way to accomplish this requirement or whether it s need ABAP development.
    Thank You & Best Regards
    Sameera

    this BAPI just creates movements, you access your Z-tables from the ABAP that calls this BAPI, isn't it?
    But in the exit EXIT_SAPMM07M_001  you can program to read the Z-tables and do the necessary steps to restrict the usage, hence you can use the standard transactions for the movements without needing an extra program that calls a BAPI.

  • Account determination for project stock delivery (for movement type 281Q)

    Hello
    We are trying to carry out delivery for project stock (CNS0) using  movement type 281Q.
    We notice that there is no account modifier availalbe for this scenario resulting in error during PGI. However, we can do PGI after changing the config of account determination without account modifier.
    Since working without an account modifier is not acceptable for various business reasons, we must have an account modifier defined. We are wondering why SAP has not provided a standard solution for dealing with project stock delivery.
    Can any one please suggest how to deal this situation.
    Thanks and warm regards,
    Jagadeeesh

    We have business requirement as stated below:
    We need to procure materials for specific Projects but also want to track the stock for the Project by value in the invnetory. In other words, the encumbrance of the procurement needs to take place against the Project but we want to be able to take it into inventory as a valuated stock and issue to the WBS whenever it is required.
    Is this possible?  What we know is that as soon as we give reference of the WBS for the Procurement, it gets expensed to the Project and we cannot value manage in inventory.
    The reason for this requirement is there is a long time between when the item is procured and when it is used for the project. Till such time we have to track the Project items in the inventory as any other stock but its still tagged for the project and encumbrance would need to have happened
    Any ideas on how to deal with this will be appreciated
    Thanks
    Noornie

  • Stock Transfer for Excisable Materials Using Movement Type 301

    Hi,
    We are having a Plant 1002 as excisable Materials.
    During GR we following the process like GR (Part -I), Capture Invoice, Post Invoice.
    Can we transfer the Material from Plant 1002 to other Plant, say 1001, using Movement Type 301?
    Or we need to follow some other router for Stock Transfer for the Excisable Materials?
    I was told by the ex-consultant that we would be using Mov Type 301 for all Stock Transfers, but I have a doubt, please guide.*
    Regards,

    Hi PK,
    Here in Brazil we work with excisable material and when we have to transfer it plant to plant, we have to use IVA that performs tax posts on accounting document. Also, we have to create Nota Fiscal (BrazillianLegal Document).
    I think you have to talk to your legal/accounting area in order to make sure which procedure you will have to use.
    If you need tax posting on accounting document, then you will not be able to use 301 movement type.
    We use MM/SD Plant to Plant transfer (movement type 861 / 862)
    Depending on your Legal/accounting area feed back, you could use this scenario or just MM plant to plant transfer (movement type 303/305).
    If they are ok with no tax postings on accounting document, then 301 movement type should be used.
    Try to make a test, show then how it works, then you could get ok from then
    I hope it helps you.
    Best Regards,
    Natan

  • Miss value FI Posting on Sales Order Transfer Posting movement Type 413 E

    Dear Expertise
                   I've a problem about sales order transfer posting. My both of Sales order (Source & Destination) are make to order and open with configurable material(KMAT). Both of sales order contain only one item on the same material no.
    Assume scenario material vastr
    Assume that material vastr is configurable material wait for sales order to fill characteristic and it was maintained standard price value = 1100
                    Sales order A  has plan cost  on material  VASTR  1000
                    Sales order B has plan cost material VASTR 980
    When we make a sales order transfer posting(Transfer from Sales Order A-> B) by transaction MIGO_TR by use movement type 413 E. It can post a transfer complete. But my problem is when I trace to FI-Document
                    It was post like this
                    Dr. Standard price                         1100
                    Cr. price for Sales order A(src.)  1000
                    Cr. Cost Variance                          +100
    I don't want it to offset with standarad price value. I want it to do like this
                    Dr. price for Sales order B(Des.)   980
                    Cr. price for Sales order A(src.)  1000
                    Dr. Cost Variance                           +20
    How can I configure it?   I trial to clear standard price by MR21, System can do it . But I don't want to clear it because it impact to other. I want to know. How can I configure system to take both of plan cost of sales order to offset each other please.
    Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:23 PM
    Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:42 PM
    Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:42 PM

    Hi,
    411- E- sales order to own stock
    412-E- Reversal of 411 E
    & 413-E-Sales order to sales order.
    Regards,
    Piyush

Maybe you are looking for

  • Couldn't open my Photoshop CC

    Hi guys, I have a major problem to open my Photoshop CC. Does anyone know how to solve this? After this screen, the photoshop cc just crash. I have tried to reinstall it already for few times too... Thanks!

  • Store sql script in database

    Hi all, pls is there any way to store a sql script in database and be able to run it from a report or a form. many thanks, hany

  • Related to dates

    Hi Experts, I want to ask a very basic question. If I need to add 90days to system date(sy-datum) or any particular date, Shall I need to convert the date to days or can I do it directly? It would be helpful if anybody can provide me examples of work

  • GRAPHIC CARDS AND 10.6.4 PROBLEMS - MAKES CS5 CRASHING!

    Photoshop CS5 has crashed on me several times today and *my screen becoming extremely distorted and flickering very fast, locking up the Mac and not responding at all*, leaving me to reboot. I tried PS CS5 in 32-Bit mode, and it is still crashing. +T

  • HT2311 Why can't I download the latest version of iTunes on my iMac?

    I tried downloading many times in different ways and even called support, the installation doesn't complete it just runs for hours and hours!! PLEASE HELP.