Stock Transport G/L Postings In Transit

We are using the stock transport orders to move product between plants within the same company code. When the GI is posted to the delivery document, offsetting G/L posting are created in the issuing and receiveing plants to the inventory account for FG inventory.
Our controlling group has asked if it is possible to post to an "In Transit" G/L account in the receiving plant when the 641 movment is processed. They would then like another G/L posting associated with the 101 movment to move the value from an In Transit account to the normal inventory G/L account. Is this possible?

As an example:
Current Logic
GI is posting movement 641.
   Credit to G/L account 350000 Invent-FG -$1000.00 (Sup. Plt.)
   Debit to G/L Account 350000 Invent-FG $1000.00 (Rec Plt.)
Recept of Stock Transport Order Mvt. 101
   No G/L posting
Requested Logic
GI is posting movement 641.
   Credit to G/L account 350000 Invent-FG -$1000.00 (Sup. Plt.)
   Debit to G/L acccout 359981 Gds In Transit $1000 (Recv Plt.)
Recept of Stock Transport Order Mvt. 101
   Credit to G/L account 359981 Gds in Transit -$1000 (Recv Plt.)
   Debit to G/L account 350000 Invent-FG $1000.00 (Recv. Plt.)
The business feels the standard "Current Logic" does not give them the necessary visibility of In-Transit inventory in the G/L
Regards,
Michael

Similar Messages

Stock Transport Scheduling Agreement - error message: 'Stock in transit...

Stock Transport Scheduling Agreement - error message: 'Stock in transit exceeded'
Hi, I do have a question about transport scheduling agreements.
I have created a stock transport scheduling agreement via ME37, doc. type LU for a stock material from issuing plant TT01 to receiving plant TH01. The material is maintained in both plants.
After that,I maintain the delivery schedule via ME38 for a quantity for today. The quantity is available at issuing plant TT01, checked via MMBE.
Then, I try to post the goods via MIGO. When I try to post the document, I get the following error message: "PL Stock in transit exceeded by 1,000 T% : 794 TH01 S1". Why do I get that? My target is to decreate the stock quantity in TT01 and to increase the stock quantity in TH01.
Thanks, Peter

Hi,
This happens when you are issuing more on the schudle qty, Check you have anything on the transit receive it the try agin to process the issue.
Hope it helps.
Suresh

Stock transport order /stock in transit

Hello
For a stock Transport order scenario { Recieving Plant , Delivering plant } , the documented procedure is:-
1) stock transport order>Goods issue by delivering plant--
>stock in transit(valuated) -- >Unrestricted/inquality/blocked/consumption
just sticking to the above method, how many Material documents & accounting documents would be generated ?
Thanks

Hi,
It depends on your setting, whether you go for 2-step Stock Transport or 1-step.
If It is 1-step then 1 material document and 1 accounting document.
This material document will be of movement type 647 and stock will not come in transit, stock will directly get moved from Supplying Plant to Receiving Plant.
And if it is 2-step then 2 material documents and 1 accounting document.
1 material document for GI from Supplying Plant to Stock in Transit (Movement Type - 641), and another from stock in transit to receiving plant (Movement Type - 101).
And it will update PO History in both the cases.
You can config. this in SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Setup Stock Transport order > Assign Document Type, One-Step Procedure, Underdelivery Tolerance > here activate "One-step" indicator if you want 1-step otherwise keep blank for 2-step.

How to implement issuing stock in-transit for stock transport orders

Hello,
We are using stock transport orders in SAP. At the moment the supplying plant does a post goods issue for the delivery, the stock in-transit is "owned" by the receiving plant. Our Finance department wants this to be changed in such a way that the stock will be owned by the issuing plant until it has been received by the reciving plant.
It seems there is a possibility to do that, but I can not figure out what exactly needs to be done. Can someone explain to me the steps that need to be taken to implement this?
Thanks,
Ed

Try MB5TD. Please also check OSS notes 1120843, 1268193, 925384.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 22, 2009 8:28 AM

Account Postings in case Subscontarcting and Stock Transport Order.

Hi All,
Please help in understanding what account keys(G/L Accounts ) will be hit in the follwoing scenerios:
1. Standard Subscontarcting Process during GR.
2. Stock Transport Order , Delivery Type NL
    Movement Type , 641 and 101.
3. Stock Transport Order , Delivery Type NLCC
    Movement Type , 643 and 101.

Hi
1. Standard Subscontarcting Process during GR:
For eg) You are giving Components A & B to the SC-Vendor....and Getting back the Finished Product "C" from the SC-Vendor....
Now during GR...If you have activated Price Diff. account for SC Materials for your Plant in OLMB -
> GR -
> Activate Price Diff. Acc. for SC Material for your Plant....then foll. posting lines will be created..
Stock Acc. of F/G Product "C".... ..      BSX          Debited
GR/IR Clearing Acc.              .......       WRX         Credited
SC-Vendor service Charges .........       FRL          Debited
Stock Acc.of Components A & B..........BSX          Credited
Change in Stock Acc. of Comp. A&B....GBB-VBO Debited(+)
Change in Stock acc.of F/G Product "C".....BSV    Credited(-)
Price Diff Acc......................................PRD   As per situation
2. Stock Transport Order , Delivery Type NL
Movement Type , 641 and 101:
At Supplying Plant( During movement type:641)
Stock Account of Supp.Plant.....BSX Credited
Stock Acc. ofb Rec. Plant ........BSX Debited
If you maintain Std. Price for the material at Receiving Plant and if there is any Price difference...then Price Diff.Acc. will be triggered....ie) AUM....
At receiving Plant( for M.type:101) there will not be any acc.documents gennerated...
3. Stock Transport Order , Delivery Type NLCC
Movement Type , 643 and 101.
At Supplying Plant(M.Type:643):
Stock Acc.......................................BSX Credited(-)
Cost of Goods Sold Acc...................VAX debited(+)
At Receiving plant( M.Type:101):
Stock Acc.......................................BSX Debited
GR/IR Clearing Acc..........................WRX Credited(-)
Reward if useful
Regards
S.Baskaran

Stock transport not creating entry in MARD

Hi,
I have created a stock transport order UB from one storage location to another within the same plant.
I created a delivery and posted the goods issue. It generated a material document with movement type 641.
The delivery is not yet received in the receiving storage location.
Now, the problem is that the quantity does not show as "stock in transfer" in the Plant stock view of the material master.
Also, the value for MARD-UMLME is zero, even though I have posted the GI for the delivery and not done any GR in the receiving storage location.
Does anyone know what is wrong?
Regards,
Ola

MARD-UMLME
Stock in transfer (from one storage location to another)
Quantity that has already been withdrawn from the issuing storage
location but has not yet arrived at the receiving storage location.
This stock in transfer contains the quantity being transferred as the
result of transfer postings in Inventory Management, but not the
quantity being transferred on the basis of stock transport orders.
See OSS note 25220:
When goods issue is posted for a cross-company purchase order (for a delivery with movement type 643), stock in transit is not updated in the receiving plant.
Cause and prerequisites
This procedure was chosen because usually the issuing and receiving companies have to be managed on different computers. In addition, goods receipt in the receiving plant can be posted before goods issue in the issuing plant with this kind of stock transfer, i.e., the corresponding stock in transit would temporarily be negative.
Solution
You can use the reporting function in Purchasing to display the stock quantities in transit.
Starting with release 3.0D, the stock found with cross-company orders in transit is displayed in the stock overview (transaction MMBE) as well as displayed dynamically determined in the plant availability (MB53).

Impact of different division on Stock Transport Order

We have a situation where we have one plant with one customer number, but we have 2 business areas of material going through it. Example: The material exists in divison 10 business area 15. The customer is configured to business area 15. No problem here. But we also have material in division 10 business area 13. The financial postings are correct, as the material comes out of 13 and goes into 13 on the receiving end, however on the stock transport order, it will show 10/15. What is the impact of this? Will it affect reports? Do we need a separate plant for 10/13? The configuration will not work with the business area blank.
Please advise. Thank you.

Hi
A product or service is always assigned to just one division. From the point of view of sales and distribution, the use of divisions lets you organize your sales structure around groups of similar products or product lines. This allows the people in a division who process orders and service customers to specialize within a manageable area of expertise.
The system uses divisions to determine the sales areas and the business areas for a material, product, or service.
So by changing division you are changing business area also. And you have cross and vertical reports business area wise and division wise. So standard report will not go wrong.
regards
Antony

Cannot Input Goods Receipt for a Stock Transport Order

Dear all,
I created a stock transport order from one plant to another. But in the following "MIGO" transaction, the system indicates "Document xxxxxxxxx does not contain any selectable items".
In the stock transport order, I simply input the supplying plant, material, the receiving plant for the material. The item category is "U" (Stock Transfer).
Anybody have any idea?
Thanks, Jerome

Hi
What is your process? is it via shipping or via only purchasing?
If it is ony via purchasing, have you moved stock from Supplying plant to stock in transit. Then you can make MIGO.
If it is via shipping, create delivery VL10B and PGI, Then do MIGO.
regards
Srinivas

Stock Transport Order u2013 Duplicate goods receipt quantity

We implemented the scenario: the stock transport order process with SD. To post the goods issue , we have created a new goods movement type (937) with reference to the movement type: 641, to differentiate these movements of other goods movements that are made in the company, because in this case, for issuing plant it is necessary to manually confirm these goods issues in WM (We need use storage bins in issuing plant). The outbound delivery, in issuing plant, is created through the transaction VL10B with reference to Stock transport Order, and goods issues is posted using transaction VL02N. In receiving plant, we use transaction MIGO to post goods receipt.
Then, when we post the goods receipt for one replenishment delivery in Transaction MIGO, the system issues error message: M7022 telling us: u201Cthat the stock in transit has been exceeded by XXXu201D. The difference between the stock in transit and the Quantity in Unit of Entry is exactly equal to the quantity that was reported in the goods issue in Issuing Plant (outbound delivery). That is, Quantity in Unit of Entry is duplicated with respect to outbound delivery quantity. But if the goods receipt is posted with reference to the stock transport order, the Quantity in Unit of Entry is calculated correctly and corresponds with the quantity of outbound delivery of the issuing plant. This does not happen when using the standard goods movement type 641. As mentioned above, we have configured Warehouse Management for issuing plant.
The only difference between the standard scenario and implemented one in the company is the goods movement type, which is a copy of movement type 641. So, my question is: Can not copy the goods Movement type 641 (Transfer to stock in transit)? Please, I appreciate your support to resolve this issues.
Best regards,

All goods movements are being posted in the same unit of measure (base unit of measure ), since the material has no alternative units of measure configured. And we think that has to do with the movement type, because when using the standard movement type (641), the whole process is flowing properly. However, when using the new movement type, the system behaves the way it was explained earlier.
Through various tests, we identified that the quantity is duplicated when the table T321 (Assignment MM Movement Type --> MM-WM Movement Type) and the IMG view V_156S_WM (Reference Movement Types for Warehouse Management) are set, since it also was created a new movement type for WM. For this reason we think that the problem lies in the configuration of the new movement type.
Anyway, thanks for your help.

Overdelivery in intra-company stock transport order

Hello,
I have the following scenario - I have two plants, 1000 and 2000, both under the same company code.
I transfer 450KG of material 123456 from plant 1000 using STO with SD (mvt. type 641), material is packed in HUs. In the receiving plant, the HUs are being place on a weight to check their actual weight. It;s possible for the actual weight be greater than the GI weight of 450KG (for example, due to weight scale accuracy issues) . When doing GR, I need to be able to receive quantity greater than the GI quantity. That is not allowed in stock transport order (per note 212387). For the same scenario with intercompany STO (GI mvt type 643) I'm able to post GR quantity which is greater than GI qty.
Any suggestion on how to solve this? Can I create a customer order type that is both intra-company and allows for overdelivery?
Thanks,
Yossi

a overdelivery does not make any sense in stock transfers, you would solve the problem of the stock accuracy in the receiving plant, but at the same time you create another problem with a negative stock in transit, that never gets cleared.
a STO having stock left in transit is never considered as closed. even intercompany stock transfers are not considered as closed, even you can receive more than issued.
Latest when archiving purchasing documents then you will see all your error in the process design, because only closed business cases can be archived.
in stock transfer business you always have to care about both sides, you cannot just care about the receiving plant and ignore the problems of the sending plant.

Excise Duty handling for Inter company Stock Transport Orders in SAP 4.6C

I want to handle Excise Duty handling for Inter company Stock Transport Orders in SAP 4.6C. I know that SAP has provided standard solutions in 4.7C by giving one standard table OIH09 which can be maintained through Customisation.
In 4.6C, even the Goods issue & Goods receipt button in item details of Stock Transport order is not available.
Is there any work around for the same.

In IS-OIL, cross company postings were stopped with Note # 623910 & would
require a core modification to achieve this functionality.

Stock Transport order with Freight Charges- Payable to an external vendor

Hello
we are implementing the stock transport order between two plants in SAP 4.7. The document type is UB and it has to be a two step process. We need to post the Freight Charges as well. The freight Provider is external vendor.
What is the best way of configuring this scenario for freight cost?
I did put the freight forearder vendor code on the conditiond tab detail of condition tyep FRA1 but can't do the invoice verification for the same.
Any tips are appreciated.

Hello,
This EhP4 feature addresses only the one step Stock Transport Order to subcontracting vendor for intra company.
Does anybody know how to do a two steps Stock Transport Order to subcontracting vendor for intra company?
By "two steps" I mean:
1- Goods Issue from supplying plant A to in-transit stock of the subcontracting vendor at receiving plant B.
2- Inbound Delivery Notification (IDN) at receiving plant B + Goods receipt against this IDN into the subcontracting stock at receiving plant B.
Thanks and regards,
Stéphane

Excise Pricing procedure for Stock Transport Order in MM with TAXINN

I am an SD guy running STO from manufacturing plant to sales depot
AND not able to create JEX proforma excise invoice from NL
to TEST my configuration, I created excise invoice in J1IS with respect to goods issue from NL from UB means configuration is ok
BUT base amount in J1IS is coming as zero because of missing excise conditions in MM STO pricing procedure
CAN anybody give me a sample EXCISE pricing procedure for STO
AND do i need to create records for the condition types in FV11 OR MEK1 please clarify
I know that calculation type 362 attached to BASB in TAXINN has something to do with this
I am able to see chapter ID in J1IS
And the relation between condition types in TAXINN and excise pricing procedure for STO
And I am able to create excise invoice in J1IG with zero excise values
I also maintained pricing procedure determination for JEX in OVKK that is document pricing procedure N pricing procedure JINSTOCK
I think my explanation is sufficient enough
please give A sample of TAXINN

Hi Yoga,
Here u not need to do VL10b.just follow this steps and try.
In PO,Document type is UB and Item Category is U.
After creating PO,In MB!B with reference that PO number and using movt type 541
then u can see that stock in Transit.Now u do GR with respect to PO number.
Thanks & Regards
Suresh.
> Hello MM Gurus,
>
> I am doing Stock transport order between 2 plants
> under same company code.
> I have maintained all the required settings.Following
> is the process flow.
>
> 1.Creation of Purchase order with document type
> UB.(ME21N)
> 2.Creation of outbound delivery with respect to
> Purchase order.(VL10B)
> 3.Post Goods Issue from the supplying plant. (VL02N)
> 4.Creation of Excise Invoice in supplying plant.
> (J1IS)
> 5.Goods receipt at the receiving plant.(MIGO)
>
> While I am doing Goods receipt in the receiving
> plant, system is giving an error
> message "Maintain Vendor for the Excise Invoice" -
> Message no. 4F185.
> Why this message is coming and how to resolve this?
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Yoga

Stock transport order issue

Hi
My bussiness process is i have created stock transport order purchase order in me21n t.code doc type UB,item category 'U'then i do mb11 t.code 351 movement type Transfer posting to stock in transit from unrestricted-use.then i do the goods receipt in migo t.code.
Now my system taking goods receipt with Zero quantity without 351 movement goods not happening,is there any configuration i miss,
Regards
Sam

Hi,
For the STO , with 351 movement type its issue goods receipt from issuing plant n the stock will b in transit( on a way), so goods receipt will not happen in receiving plant and stock value is zero. For goods receipt to happen please do GR wrt 101 movement type. Then stcok will b updated.
Hope this clears.
Smitha

Stock Transport Order-shipping point not determined

Hi MM Gurus,
We need to set up STO for transferring stock from plant 2000 to 1000. I have completed following setting.
IMG
Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization to company code
Both the sales orgnizations are in same company code. We have only one company code.
Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization - distribution channel - plant
The sales area 1000 is are assigned to both the plants 1000 & 2000 and sales area 2000 is also assigned to both the plants.
Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Logistics Execution-Assign shipping point to plant
Plant 1000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000. Plant 2000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000.
Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Define Shipping Data for Plants
For plant 1000 & 2000 cusomer master 56 & 57 respectively are maintained. The sales orginzation for these plants are 1000 & 2000 respectively.
Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule
Delivery type NL has been assigned to document type UB.
The details of customer master 56 & 57 are as below
Account Group - Sold To Party
Reconcilliation account -121000
Delivery plant 1000 & 2000 respectively
Please note - No vendor number is maintained in these cusomer masters.
Created these plants as vendors
Account group 0007(Plants) and assigned plant numbers in the additional data of purchasing.
Material 251 is created and maintained in both the sales orgnization.
Now when I am creating the STO for transferring goods from plant 2000 to 1000, I am getting error message.
"Not possible to determine shipping data for material 251"
Am I missing something? Some documentation say that I should create a receiving plant as customer in the sales area of supplying plant. If this is true, how to do it?
Also, what is the significance of return vendor (maintaining vendor master in the customer) in this case?
Your any clue will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Shekhar

Shekhar,
Customer must be maintained as a shipto as well.
In your STO config settings you don't need a customer assigned to the source plant, unless it will also be a destination plant (e.g. you also intend to execute STOs in the reverse direction, or from another plant).
While looking at your customer (shipto), you will also want to look at Route Determination for this customer. Typically, your route will be defined by customer zone (from cust master), shipping point zone (from shipping point definition configuration), and shipping conditions (customer master). Route will be used during delivery creation to schedule the delivery. Logically, the total duration between Material Availability date to Delivery date of the delivery (picking/packing/load/transit) should be something close to the planned delivery time in the Material Master, in order to maintain consistency throughout the entire planning and execution process.
Don't forget to maintain your STO Purchase req stuff IMG>MM>Purch>PurReq>Set up Stock Transport Requisition.
Rgds,
DB49

Stock Transport G/L Postings In Transit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for