Stop waiting for erase

Hi,
I lost my macbook air with sensitive information on it. I logged in into icloud and requested a deletion of the data, when the computer is online the next time. Now i got my macbook back () and it has not been online since.
I have a backup of my data (Timemachine), but is it possible to stop the deletion? Or can i backup my data, when i open it, when no wifi is accessible? Could apple help me with this? I am thinking of buying a support ticket.

Hi Wolfgang,
If you go to SXMB_MONI_BPE you can see various options to play around with work item and work flows.
if you want to change workflow state manually just execute Diagnosis Processes with Error option here you can edit work item and workflow states.
Cheers,
Jag

Similar Messages

  • Thanks for the reply to my question regarding sound in iMovie and sending me the online links.  however the online links are impossible to play as they upload too slowly with the result that the playing keeps stopping waiting for the content to catch up

    Thanks for your reply to my question regarding sound in iMovie.  However I cannot follow the links you sent as they upload too slowly and therefore the instructional movie keeps stopping waiting for the content toload.  Surely theremust be a solution for this??
    Thanks in advance
    lolly

    Please continue posting in your original thread.
    With the amount of traffic on these forums it is impossible to chase around finding this.

  • Stop waiting for event 'SEND_OK_TRANSPORT' of CL_SWF_XI_MESSAGE

    Hi,
    I designed a BPM with a sender requesting for a Transport Acknowledgement.
    But earlier I defined via IDX_NOALE, that no Ack. should be sent.
    My problem is now, that I have a lot of messages waiting for the event 'SEND_OK_TRANSPORT' of object type CL_SWF_XI_MESSAGE.
    How can I stop these workitems (>10000 workitems
    Is there a report to fix this problem?
    Thanks a lot
    Regards
    Wolfgang

    Hi Wolfgang,
    If you go to SXMB_MONI_BPE you can see various options to play around with work item and work flows.
    if you want to change workflow state manually just execute Diagnosis Processes with Error option here you can edit work item and workflow states.
    Cheers,
    Jag

  • Capture Process hangs and LOGMINER Stops - "wait for transaction" ???

    HI all
    Any ideas why the LOGMINRER would stop mining the logs at the capture site DB (just hangs 40 short of current archivelog)
    Capture Process is a status of Capturing Changes
    And the wait event on the Capture Process is "wait for transaction"
    How to diagnose whats wrong with Capture Process - been this way for 4 days !

    Hi
    Yes we have had to explicity register archivelogs also.
    Unfortunately this archivelog is registered -> so I am not sure. It apapers to have been as a result of a large DML transaction -> and I am not 100% sure the archivelog is posibly corrupt (however I doubt it as in 5 years as DBA I have not once hit a corruption - but always a first).
    Any thoughts on how to proceed ?

  • How do I get an actor to wait for its nested actors to stop running before stopping itself?

    I'm developing a series of projects that are based on the Actor Framework and my actor dependency hierarchy is starting to get some depth. One of the issues I'm facing now is making sure that each actor will only stop running (and signal this via a Last Ack to a higher-level actor or via a notification to non-AF code that launches it) once all of its nested actors have stopped running.
    For instance, say I have a type of actor that handles communication with a microcontroller over USB - a USB Controller Actor. I might want to have an application-specific actor that launches USB Controller Actor to issue commands to the microcontroller. When shutting down, I want this top-level actor to send a Stop Msg to USB Controller Actor and then wait to receive a Last Ack back before sending a notification within a provided notifier to the non-AF application code, which can then finish shutting down completely.
    I'm sure that having actors wait for all nested actors to shutdown before shutting down themselves is an extremely common requirement and I'm confident National Instruments have made it possible to handle that in a simple, elegant manner. I'm just struggling to figure out what that is.
    The approaches I've experimented with are:
    Creating a pseudo "Stop" message for an actor that won't actually stop it running straight away, but instruct it to stop all nested actors, wait for their Last Acks and then shut itself down by sending Stop Msg to itself. This isn't elegant because it means the client will be forced to fire off these pseudo stop messages instead of Stop Msg to certain actors.
    Instantiating an internally-used notifier and overriding Stop Core.vi and Handle Last Ack Core.vi. The idea is that within Stop Core.vi, I send Stop Msg to each of the nested actors and then make it wait indefinitely on the internal notifier. Within Handle Last Ack Core.vi, I make it send a notification using this notifier which allows Stop Core.vi to continue and perform deinitialisation for the top-level actor itself. Figures 1 & 2 below show this approach. I wasn't confident that this would work since it assumed that it was possible for Stop Core.vi to execute and then Handle Last Ack Core.vi to concurrently execute some time after. These assumptions didn't hold and it didn't work. It would have been messy even if it had.
    Overriding Stop Core.vi, making it send Stop Msg to each nested actor and then waiting for an arbitrarily long period of time (100ms, 200ms, etc.). What if a nested actor takes only 10ms to shut down? What if takes 400ms?
    The figures below show how I implemented the second approach. Ignore the broken object wires - they only appear that way in the snippets.
    Figure 1 - Stop Core.vi from the second approach
    Figure 2 - Handle Last Ack Core.vi from the second approach

    tst wrote:
    It wasn't that hard to find - https://decibel.ni.com/content/thread/27138?tstart=0
    But with dozens of posts, I have no intention of rereading it now.
    Also, when crossposting, it's considered polite to add a link, so that people can see if the other thread has relevant replies.
    Thanks. I've only read the first page for now but I find this interesting (I'm not sure how to format non-reply quotes, sorry):
     "AristosQueue wrote:
    CaseyLamers1 wrote:
    I think that this would be a nice addition. I think how a program stops is just as important as how it starts.
    I think everyone who has worked on AF design agrees with this. Indeed, managing "Stop" was *the* thing that lead to the creation of the Actor Framework in the first place. The other issues (deadlock/hang avoidance and resource management) were secondary to just trying to get a clean shutdown.
    CaseyLamers1 wrote:
    I find the current code a bit lacking.
    My concern would be that the mixing of a verified stop and a regular stop could create confusion and lead to people having trouble during editting and testing with the project ending up locked (due to VIs left running which did not shutting down).
    Your concern is to some degree why no verified Stop exists in the AF already. We looked at each actor as an independent entity, and left it open to the programmer to add an additional managment layer for those applications that needed it. But over time, I have seen that particular management layer come up more often, which is why I am exploring the option."
    So that gives one of the reasons why this hasn't already been implemented but also points out that it's something quite a lot of people want.
    > Also, when crossposting, it's considered polite to add a link, so that people can see if the other thread has relevant replies.
    Noted. Here's the discussion: https://decibel.ni.com/content/message/104983#104983
    Edit: since there doesn't seem to be any NI-provided way of doing this yet, I suppose I'll try rolling my own at some point. The ideas posted in the discussion you linked seem pretty useful.

  • Is there a way to stop the OS from switching to a newly opened app?  I would like to be able to continue what I'm doing while I wait for an app to launch and not get interrupted by a forced entry into the app.

    Is there a way to stop the OS from switching to a newly opened app?  I would like to be able to continue what I'm doing while I wait for an app to launch and not get interrupted by a forced entry into the app.
    As an example, I'm going to my email in safari, while I wait for it to load, I open an excel document, and the OS decides excel should be the front app, so I go back to safari so I can enter my login info, but halfway through my password the OS decides that excel is where I should finish typing my password.
    VERY ANNOYING.  Can I open apps in the background?

    Thank you everyone for the suggestions. J D, I'm not a terminal fan, but I'm sure it works.  I found a solution that I can use in the dock from another post. 
    Annoyed by Mac OS
    Works great and allows me to maximize those multitasking minutes.

  • What is this all about? "The "QuickTime Plug-in 7.6.6" plug-in is slowing down your Mac. You can wait for it to recover or stop it now."  I'm running Mavericks 6.8.

    I regularly get a prompt reading as follows: "The "QuickTime Plug-in 7.6.6" plug-in is slowing down your Mac. You can wait for it to recover or stop it now."  I've tried waiting, but nothing happens.  I "stop it now" and lose the page I'm reading.

    GJD
    You haven't provided quite enough info for anyone to be able to help. Please follow these tips:
    Quoted from Apple's "How to write a good question"
       To help other members answer your question, give as many details as you can.
    Include your product name and specs such as processor speed, memory, and storage capacity. Please do not include your Serial Number, IMEI, MEID, or other personal information.
    Provide the version numbers of your operating system and relevant applications, for example "iOS 6.0.3" or "iPhoto 9.1.2".
    Describe the problem, and include any details about what seems to cause it.
    List any troubleshooting steps you've already tried, or temporary fixes you've discovered.
    CCC

  • TS4124 I have songs posted in my iTunes as"waiting"  these have been waiting for 2 weeks.  how can i get them to stop "waiting"?

    I have itunes match which inported songs from my pc.  Most of the songs imported OK but many are "waiting"  I have turned off itunes match then back on but nothings seems to help them inport or stop "waiting"  what can I do?
    Also when I did the match some songs within an alblum are listed in bold black, others more grayed.  I can play the black songs but the grayed ones are inactive, any ideas for that?

    I had exactly the same problem. Check that the tracks still appear in your iTunes folder under Music (they should if you've re-downloaded them from the cloud). Next, look in your Movies folder and the songs might appear as individual folders. Delete those folders, empty your trash and then delete the tracks from the Movies tab in iTunes.
    Hope this helps.

  • HT201274 My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON

    My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON ?

    I'm having this EXACT same problem with my iPhone 4, and I have the same computer stats (I have a Samsung Series 7)

  • Can iTunes be set to stop at the end of a track and wait for a manual play.

    I am wanting to use itunes to play sound effects in a live drama but I need to have it stop at the end of each track and wait for a manual start. It needs to be done without deselecting and selecting tracks by myself and, importantly, others who may be confused by the computer.
    If iTunes can't do this is there any other app that can, I've been looking but failed to find any apart from DJ packages which are more complicated than I would like for others to use.
    Dave

    You want to have a bunch of tracks, play them in order, the first one plays then it stops and all you have to do is hit Play to continue to next track?
    This script will do it.
    Play the first track and iTunes will stop at the end and queue up the next song. Just press Play (or Spacebar) and it'll  play the second song and stop till the end of the playlist.
    No need to select any songs or do anything fancy.
    -> Stop Track!
    "This script applet runs in the background while an iTunes playlist is playing. Whenever the accompanying "STOP_TRACK_05sec.mp3" track is encountered, the script will stop iTunes and advance to the next track, which you can start manually."

  • When watching a rented movie, it just stops and we have to wait for it to reload

    When watching a rented movie, the movie pauses and we have to wait for it to reload.  is there anything that we can do to stop this?

    This is likely caused by your network.
    What is your connection speed? www.speedtest.net
    6mbps is required for the best experience on HD (you can change to SD in the settings)
    If on wifi try ethernet and www.istumbler.net to check interference
    Make sure you're using the ISPs DNS

  • My IPhone 5's Imessages just stopped working and I tried restarting and then turning them off and turning them on.  It now says "Waiting for activation" and has said this for 15 minutues.

    My IPhone 5's Imessages just stopped working and I tried restarting and then turning them off and turning them on.  It now says "Waiting for activation" and has said this for 15 minutues.

    At the time of this post, there seems to be a problem with iMessage and Facetime but only some users are affected.
    http://www.apple.com/support/systemstatus/

  • Stopping program without waiting for trigger

    Hi everybody
    I have a problem that I just can't get my head around. I have a program that I use to aquire data. The program goes through the motions of waiting for the trigger, aquiring the data on the appropriate channel, displaying it, and loops back to waiting for the trigger. The problem is That when I want to stop my program while it is waiting for a trigger I must wait for it to recieve a trigger before it will stop excution.
    Is there a way for my program to stop the trigger vi when I select to end the program?
    Thanks
    Beaton
    - there is always an easy way, but it is always the hardest to find

    Hi Beaton,
    you have to split the 'wait for trigger time' into shorter sub-steps.
    Let's say you wait 10sec for trigger signal. Make a loop instead waiting 1 second for 10 times! After each iteration you can check for: 'break the loop (end program)' or 'trigger received' or 'any other error occured'. This way you can stop your program very easily - you can also make your own error state saying 'Error number 123456: stopped by user'...
    Best regards,
    GerdW
    CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
    Kudos are welcome

  • My machine has gone dead slow. I have to wait for minutes to perform every single function. Like it stopped typing four times during this question.

    My machine has gone dead slow. I have to wait for minutes to perform every single function. Like it stopped typing four times during this question.

    If this started happening without your having made any changes and without a warning of low disk space, then it's likely that the boot drive, or some other hardware component, is failing. Back up all data immediately, then run the Apple Hardware Test or Apple Diagnostics.
    Even if the test is negative, you should make a "Genius" appointment at an Apple Store to have the machine tested more thoroughly.

  • When opening a webpage, my browser stops downloading its content while waiting for an eternity at certain items, how can I filter them?

    Because of the location where I live, most of google services are blocked on the internet. Yesterday I wanted to download a device driver from www.m-audio.com but the driver's page stopped loading. I noticed a message at the bottom left of the Firefox window saying "waiting for www.google.com" or something similar. Because of that wait, I could open the page only after 4 tries and waiting way too much time. Can I filter page contents from google so Firefox skips them?

    You can look at Adblock Plus.
    * Adblock Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/
    You need to subscribe to a Filter list (e.g. the EasyList).
    * http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions
    * http://adblockplus.org/en/getting_started

Maybe you are looking for

  • JDBC, Tomcat, J2EE server

    I would like to request help with JDBC, Tomcat and the J2EE server. I have figured out how to connect a servlet running in Tomcat 4.0 to a Filemaker database using Filemaker's JDBC drivers: Class.forName("com.fmi.jdbc.JdbcDriver"); fmpConnection = Dr

  • Not able to restrict user groups from accessing certain entities

    We have created user groups and are trying to give them restricted access to certain entities so that they can perform consolidations only for those entities. But even after creating Security Classes (and assigning them to the entities in the metadat

  • A dumb question

    Dear all, We have an OLTP mysql database which works fine and designed with scalability feature in mind. Now we want to narrow our solution to a complete BI. To do this, we need to equip our OLTP db with ROLAP concept (which I don't know much about i

  • Reader closes when I use a command

    I upgraded to 11 and could not open any files.  Then I removed that and tried installing 10.  Now I can open pdf's, but everytime I try to print or to open the preference command so I can check on protected mode, the software closes.  I am trying to

  • L455D-S5976 Reformat to 64 bit

    I recently bought a new Toshiba laptop, so I am reformatting my L455D to give to my moher in law. I upgraded the ram last year to the max 8 gig, but because I was running 32 bit, it could not use it all. I am using my sys recovery discs to do a full